CARBONATE RESERVOIR ROCK PROPERTIES Fundamental Rock

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CARBONATE RESERVOIR ROCK PROPERTIES Fundamental Rock CARBONATE RESERVOIR ROCK PROPERTIES Fundamental rock properties include texture, composition, sedimentary structures, taxonomic diversity, and depositional morphology. The last two properties are not commonly listed as “fundamental rock properties”in most texts but they are important attributes of sedimentary deposits that must be included in thorough reservoir studies. Fundamental rock properties provide the basis for defining lithofacies, or lithogenetic units that make up depositional reservoirs. Diagenetic and fractured reservoirs are simply altered versions of the original depositional version. The most reliable method for identifying these fundamental properties in carbonates is direct observation of cores or cuttings. Cores provide enough sample volume to determine sedimentary textures, grain types, sedimentary structures, and biota. Cuttings usually provide enough volume to determine mineralogy, grain types, and estimates of texture. Logs are not very helpful in identifying fundamental rock properties in carbonates. Facies types can be identified in siliciclastic sandstones by using the shape of the gamma ray and resistivity or, with older logs, the SP – resistivity log traces. When the paired traces outline a bell, a funnel, or a cylinder, the corresponding sandstone facies are assumed to be channel - fill, deltaic, or reworked sheet sands, respectively. Other “typecurves” are assumed to be indicators of other of sand – shale depositional successions. The underlying assumption is that the gamma ray, SP, and resistivity logs are sensitive to vertical changes in grain size. In fact, that assumption is false. The logs are not sensitive to grain size. The gamma ray tool measures natural radioactivity that issues from the K, Th, and U found in clay minerals that are commonly incorporated in shales and mudrocks. The tool does not measure grain size. In fact, “ hot limes ” and “ hot dolomites ” are commonly found in carbonate reservoirs where particle size has nothing to do with the presence of natural radioactivity. The SP and resistivity tools likewise measure electrical properties of the rock – fluid system and shales tend to have less deflection from the log baseline than coarser grained sections that have bigger fluid - filled pores. Mineralogical composition is used to classify sandstones but not carbonates. Carbonate rock classification is based on grain type and depositional texture. Mineralogy may be strongly correlated with porosity in carbonates but it has much less influence on sandstone porosity. Sedimentary structures and biota can only be determined with complete certainty by observing borehole cores. Sedimentary structures provide clues to the hydrodynamics and directions of flow in ancient environments in both terrigenous sandstones and carbonates. In some cases, image logs and sensitive dip- meters can detect larger sedimentary structures such as large - scale cross-bedding in dunes. Fossil content is arguably more important for interpreting depositional environment in carbonates than in terrigenous sandstones probably because mostcarbonates form in marine environments where fossil assemblages can reveal subtle differences in depositional settings. Diverse assemblages of fossils indicate favorable environment for life. Low diversity indicates a stress environment such as a hyper - or hyposaline lagoon, low oxygen content, or some other limiting factor on life. Low diversity is rarely associated with grain - supported or reef rocks; therefore low diversitycan be a negative indicator for depositional porosity in reservoir rocks. The fundamental rock propertiesare used to classify both rocks and porosity, and how fundamental rock propertiesare related to reservoir properties. FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIESof CARBONATE RESERVOIR Fundamental properties of carbonate rocks include texture, fabric, grain type, mineralogicalcomposition, and sedimentary structures. Note that texture and fabric arenot interchangeable terms. Texture is defined as the size, shape, and arrangement ofthe grains in a sedimentary rock (Pettijohn, 1975). Among carbonate sedimentologists,texture is sometimes thought of in the context of depositional texture, whichforms the basis for several carbonate rock classification systems. Fabricrefers to thespatial arrangement and orientation of the grains in sedimentary rocks. It can alsorefer to the array geometry or mosaic pattern of crystals in crystalline carbonatesand the growth form (macroscale) and skeletal microstructure (microscale) of reeforganisms. Mineralogical compositionrefers to original mineralogy. Original mineralogicalcomposition has great significance in the study of carbonate diagenesis andit provides important clues about the chemical evolution of the earth. It is not,however, a reliable clue to the origin and distribution of reservoir flow units becausecarbonates in a wide variety of depositional settings may consist of calcite, aragonite,or dolomite, individually or in mixtures. It is more practical for the reservoir geoscientistto substitute constituent grain type, such as skeletal grains, peloids, clasts,or ooids, among others, for composition. Sedimentary structuresare preserved bedformscreated by fluid processes acting on the sediment interface, by desiccation,slope failure, thixotropy, compaction, fluid expulsion, and bioturbation by burrowing and boring organisms. 1. Texture There are many textural terms in the literature on sedimentary rocks, but mostgeologists today describe grain sizes according to the Wentworth (1922) scale inmillimeters, or in “ phi units, ” which are logarithmic transformations to the base 2of the size (in millimeters). It is rarely possible to disaggregate lithified limestonesinto component grains; consequently, direct size measurements by sieve, pipette, or hydrometer are limited to unconsolidated sediments. Estimates of grain size can bemade from thin sections of lithified carbonates, although the method requiresstatistical manipulation of grain size measurements to compensate for the factthat two - dimensional microscope measurements do not provide the true three - dimensional grain size. Tucker (1988) and Tucker and Wright (1990) discuss theproblem of determining grain sizes from thin section measurements in moredetail. The Wentworth scale (Figure ) classifies all grains with average diametersgreater than 2 mm as gravel , those with average diameters between 2 mmand 116 mm (62 μ m) as sand , and those finer than 62 μ m as mud . In this context, sanddenotes texture rather than composition. Other terms for gravel, sand, and mudinclude the Greek derivatives psephite, psammite, and pelite, but they are rarelyused in modern literature. The Latin terms rudite, arenite, and lutite appear in thecomprehensive but unwieldy sedimentary rock classification scheme of Grabau(1960). The terms appear in modern literature as calcirudite, calcarenite, and calcilutite, indicating carbonate gravel, sand, and mud, respectively. Embry and Klovan(1971) blended rudite with Dunham ’ s (1962) carbonate rock classification terminologyto create rudstone in their classification of reef carbonates. Lithified lime mudthat exhibits a mosaic of calcite crystals 1 – 4 μ m in diameter became known as micrite , a contraction of microcrystalline and calcite , coined by Folk (1959) . Someworkers now classify all carbonate mud, regardless of its size and mineralogicalcomposition, as micrite, even though that is inconsistent with the original definition. Much of this “micrite” is actually calcisiltite , or silt - sized (62 μ m to 3.90 μ m) sediment.Note that chalk is a special rock type that is not generally classified as micriteor mud. True chalk consists of cocolith skeletal fragments, usually in a grain -supported fabric. Coccolithophorids are flagellated yellow - green algae that produce a spheroidal mass of platelets that become disarticulated after death and rain downto the sea floor as disk - shaped particles 2 – 20 μ m in diameter (Milliman, 1 974). Electronmicrographs of chalk show grain - supported depositional textures without amatrix of aragonite or calcite crystals finer than the cocoliths; therefore chalk is notstrictly a mud or micrite in the sense of the detrital micrites described earlier. Of course, there are “gray” areas. Calcisiltites (lime muds) may contain some cocoliths,but they are not proper chalks. Grain size is not generally as useful for interpreting ancient hydrologic regimesin carbonate depositional environments as it neither is with terrigenous sandstones nor isgrain size consistently related to carbonate reservoir porosity or permeability. Carbonate grain size terminology Grains > 2mm ( > sand grade) CALCIRUDITES Grains 2 - 0.063mm (sand grade) CALCARENITES (Calcareous sandstones) Grains < 0.063mm (mud grade) CALCILUTITES (Calcareous mudstones or micrite) Carbonatesconsist mainly of biogenic particles that owe their size and shape to skeletalgrowth rather than to a history of mechanical transport, deposition, and arrangement. Most carbonate grains originate in the marine environment where waves andcurrents fragment, winnow, and sort sediment, primarily along strand plains andon slope changes (usually associated with bathymetric highs) that occur above 2. Fabric Depositional, diagenetic, or biogenic processes create carbonate rock fabrics. Tectonicprocesses such as fracturing and cataclasis are not part of the depositional andlithification processes but may impart a definite pattern and orientation to reservoirpermeability. Fractured reservoirs are
Recommended publications
  • User Guide: Soil Parent Material 1 Kilometre Dataset
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by NERC Open Research Archive User Guide: Soil Parent Material 1 kilometre dataset. Environmental Modelling Internal Report OR/14/025 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ENVIRONMENTAL Modelling INTERNAL REPORT OR/14/025 User Guide: Soil Parent Material 1 kilometre dataset. The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data © Crown Copyright and database rights 2012. Ordnance Survey Licence R. Lawley. No. 100021290. Keywords Contributor/editor Parent Material, Soil,UKSO. B. Rawlins. National Grid Reference SW corner 999999,999999 Centre point 999999,999999 NE corner 999999,999999 Map Sheet 999, 1:99 000 scale, Map name Front cover Soil Parent Material 1km dataset. Bibliographical reference LAWLEY., R. USER GUIDE: SOIL PARENT Material 1 Kilometre dataset. 2012. User Guide: Soil Parent Material 1km dataset.. British Geological Survey Internal Report, OR/14/025. 20pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, email [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2014. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2012 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Pan-European Geological Database for Shallow Geothermal Installations
    geosciences Article Generalized Pan-European Geological Database for Shallow Geothermal Installations Johannes Müller 1, Antonio Galgaro 2, Giorgia Dalla Santa 2, Matteo Cultrera 2, Constantine Karytsas 3, Dimitrios Mendrinos 3, Sebastian Pera 4, Rodolfo Perego 4, Nick O’Neill 5, Riccardo Pasquali 5, Jacques Vercruysse 6, Leonardo Rossi 7, Adriana Bernardi 8 and David Bertermann 1,* ID 1 GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schlossgarten 5, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; [email protected] 2 Department of Geosciences, Universita degli Studi di Padova, Via Gradenigo 635131 Padova, Italy; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (G.D.S.); [email protected] (M.C.) 3 Centre for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving, 19th km Marathonos Ave, 19009 Pikermi Attiki, Greece; [email protected] (C.K.); [email protected] (D.M.) 4 SUPSI, Stabile Le Gerre, Manno 6928, Switzerland; [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (R.P.) 5 SLR Environmental Consulting (Ireland) Limited (SLR), 7 Dundrum Business Park, Windy Arbour 14, D14 N2Y7 Dublin, Ireland; [email protected] (N.O.N.); [email protected] (R.P.) 6 GEO-GREEN sprl, Rue de Priesmont 63, 1495 Marbais, Belgium; [email protected] 7 Pietre Edil, Strada Slănic nr.2, 030242 Bucures, ti, Romania; [email protected] 8 CNR-ISAC, Corso Stati Uniti 435127 Padova, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-9131-85-25824 Received: 18 December 2017; Accepted: 17 January 2018; Published: 22 January 2018 Abstract: The relatively high installation costs for different types of shallow geothermal energy systems are obstacles that have lowered the impact of geothermal solutions in the renewable energy market.
    [Show full text]
  • NBN EN 12670 : Natural Stone
    ICS: 01.040.73; 01.040.91;; 73.020 91.100.15 Geregistreerde NBN EN 12670 Belgische norm 1e uitg., februari 2002 Normklasse : B 17 Natuursteen - Terminologie Pierre naturelle - Terminologie Natural stone - Terminology Toelating tot publicatie : 12 februari 2002 Deze Europese norm EN 12670 : 2001 heeft de status van een Belgische norm. Deze Europese norm bestaat in drie officiële versies (Duits, Engels, Frans). Belgisch instituut voor normalisatie (BIN) , vereniging zonder winstoogmerk Brabançonnelaan 29 - 1000 BRUSSEL - telefoon: 02 738 01 12 - fax: 02 733 42 64 e-mail: [email protected] - BIN Online: www.bin.be - prk. 000-0063310-66 © BIN 2002 Prijsgroep : 21 EUROPEAN STANDARD EN 12670 NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM December 2001 ICS 01.040.73; 01.040.91; 73.020; 91.100.15 English version Natural stone - Terminology Pierre naturelle - Terminologie Naturstein - Terminologie This European Standard was approved by CEN on 20 October 2001. CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the Management Centre or to any CEN member. This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the Management Centre has the same status as the official versions. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa Soil Profiles Database Version 1.1
    Africa Soil Profiles Database Version 1.1 A compilation of georeferenced and standardised legacy soil profile data for Sub-Saharan Africa (with dataset) ISRIC Report 2013/03 ISRIC – World Soil Information has a mandate to serve the international community as custodian of global soil information and to increase awareness and understanding of soils in major global issues. More information: www.isric.org J.G.B. Leenaars ISRIC – World soil Information has a strategic association with Wageningen UR (University & Research centre) Africa Soil Profiles Database Version 1.1 A compilation of georeferenced and standardised legacy soil profile data for Sub-Saharan Africa (with dataset) J.G.B. Leenaars ISRIC Report 2013/03 Wageningen, 2013 © 2013, ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen, Netherlands All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination for educational or non-commercial purposes are permitted without any prior written permission provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of materials for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from ISRIC. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Director, ISRIC – World Soil Information PO B0X 353 6700 AJ Wageningen The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] The designations employed and the presentation of materials do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of ISRIC concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Despite the fact that this publication is created with utmost care, the authors(s) and/or publisher(s) and/or ISRIC cannot be held liable for any damage caused by the use of this publication or any content therein in whatever form, whether or not caused by possible errors or faults nor for any consequences thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Nomenclature for Metamorphic Rocks
    A systematic nomenclature for metamorphic rocks: 1. HOW TO NAME A METAMORPHIC ROCK Recommendations by the IUGS Subcommission on the Systematics of Metamorphic Rocks: Web version 1/4/04. Rolf Schmid1, Douglas Fettes2, Ben Harte3, Eleutheria Davis4, Jacqueline Desmons5, Hans- Joachim Meyer-Marsilius† and Jaakko Siivola6 1 Institut für Mineralogie und Petrographie, ETH-Centre, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland, [email protected] 2 British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, [email protected] 3 Grant Institute of Geology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, [email protected] 4 Patission 339A, 11144 Athens, Greece 5 3, rue de Houdemont 54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France, [email protected] 6 Tasakalliontie 12c, 02760 Espoo, Finland ABSTRACT The usage of some common terms in metamorphic petrology has developed differently in different countries and a range of specialised rock names have been applied locally. The Subcommission on the Systematics of Metamorphic Rocks (SCMR) aims to provide systematic schemes for terminology and rock definitions that are widely acceptable and suitable for international use. This first paper explains the basic classification scheme for common metamorphic rocks proposed by the SCMR, and lays out the general principles which were used by the SCMR when defining terms for metamorphic rocks, their features, conditions of formation and processes. Subsequent papers discuss and present more detailed terminology for particular metamorphic rock groups and processes. The SCMR recognises the very wide usage of some rock names (for example, amphibolite, marble, hornfels) and the existence of many name sets related to specific types of metamorphism (for example, high P/T rocks, migmatites, impactites).
    [Show full text]
  • A Partial Glossary of Spanish Geological Terms Exclusive of Most Cognates
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A Partial Glossary of Spanish Geological Terms Exclusive of Most Cognates by Keith R. Long Open-File Report 91-0579 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 1991 Preface In recent years, almost all countries in Latin America have adopted democratic political systems and liberal economic policies. The resulting favorable investment climate has spurred a new wave of North American investment in Latin American mineral resources and has improved cooperation between geoscience organizations on both continents. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has responded to the new situation through cooperative mineral resource investigations with a number of countries in Latin America. These activities are now being coordinated by the USGS's Center for Inter-American Mineral Resource Investigations (CIMRI), recently established in Tucson, Arizona. In the course of CIMRI's work, we have found a need for a compilation of Spanish geological and mining terminology that goes beyond the few Spanish-English geological dictionaries available. Even geologists who are fluent in Spanish often encounter local terminology oijerga that is unfamiliar. These terms, which have grown out of five centuries of mining tradition in Latin America, and frequently draw on native languages, usually cannot be found in standard dictionaries. There are, of course, many geological terms which can be recognized even by geologists who speak little or no Spanish.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOSCIENCES LEXICON English, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish
    1 GEOschools GEOSCIENCES LEXICON English, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish Multilingual 2014 Geosciences Lexicon 2 “English, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish” University of Zaragoza Pedro Cebruna, 12 50009‐Zaragoza (SPAIN) GEOschools is a European Union project supported by the Lifelong Web: http://www.uz.es Learning Programme which brings together geoscientists from universities, museums, geoparks, teaching training institutions and educators which can best “translate” geosciences into language and learning opportunities Ediror: that can be understood by school students. Guillermo Meléndez Authors: GEOschools Guillermo Meléndez Coordinator: Georgia Fermeli National and Kapodistrian University of Athens-Greece: Fritz Steininger Michael Dermitzakis & Georgia Fermeli Anastasia Koutsouveli Carlos Neto de Carvalho Partners: Carolina D’Arpa Committee of Geosciences Didactics of the Geological Carolina Di Patti Society of Greece: Anastasia Koutsouveli Joana Rodrigues University of Zaragoza-Spain: Michael Dermitzakis Guillermo Meléndez Hevia Amelia Calonge University of Alcalá de Henares Madrid-Spain: Amelia Calonge García University of Palermo (G.G. Gemmellaro Geological Museum)-Italy: Carolina D’Arpa & Carolina Di Patti Naturtejo European & Global Geopark-Portugal: Carlos Neto de Carvalho & Joana Rodrigues Pictures: Krahuletz Museum-Austria: Fritz Steininger Guillermo Melendez Cover page & Book design: This document is part of the Project “GEOschools-Teaching Geosciences in Georgia Fermeli Secondary Schools”. EACEA-Lifelong Learning Programme: Comenius, ICT and Languages. Nr. 510508-2010-LLP-GR-COMENIUS-CMP. Publisher: University of Zaragoza This Project was granted with the support of the European Commission. Pedro Cebruna, 12 This publication expresses authors’ opinion and the Commission cannot be responsible for any use that may be given from the information provided. 50009‐Zaragoza (SPAIN) PRINTED IN SPAIN Copyright ©: 2014 by GEOschools 3 GEOsciences Lexicon Content 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DNRM Report Template Portrait
    This publication has been compiled by Spatial and Graphic Services, Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Tenure terminology ................................................................................................................................ 2 Geoscience terminology ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Data Model Geology
    b b b f ! b ! ! b < ! ! " ! ! ; !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "???? ??? ????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ???? ??? ????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?? !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! " !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ???? ??? ????? !! !!!!!!!!!!??? !!!!! ! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ???? ??? ????? !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ???? ????? ??????????? ????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" ; !!!! " ! ?????" ?????? ????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ????? ???????? ????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!; ????? ?????? ????? !!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ; ! ????? ???????? ????? !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! " ?????" ????????? ???? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; 2 !!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! " !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ????? ????????? ????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! 2 !!!!70 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ; ! ????? ????????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ; !!!! " ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! b ! 70 ! ????? ???????????? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!; !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!; !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!; ! ! ?????! ??????????? ! 40 !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!; ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! b !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ????? ???????????? !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! " ! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ??????????? !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? ; ! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! b !!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ???????????? ???? !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ?????????! ? !!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? b !!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ??? ???????????
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Minor-Element Content of Marine Black Shales and Related Sedimentary Rocks, 1930-65
    Selected Annotated Bibliography of Minor-Element Content of Marine Black Shales and Related Sedimentary Rocks, 1930-65 By ELIZABETH B. TOURTELOT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1293 Includes abstracts of about 375 selected articles published during 1 f) 30-65 pertaining to worldwide occurrences of black shale UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER ]. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 75-604512 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402- Price 60 cents CONTENTS Page Introduction ... v Analyses included . VIII Indexing ..... IX Acknowledgments. X Abbreviations of serials X Abstracts . Index ........ 95 Ill SELECTED ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MINOR-ELEMENT CONTENT OF MARINE BLACK SHALES AND RELATED SEDIMENTARY ROCKS, 1930-65 By ELIZABETH B. TOURTELOT INTRODUCTION This bibliography presents minor-element data from analyses of black shales and related organic-rich sedimentary rocks plus selected dis­ cussions on the source of the minor elements. Shales generally contain greater quantities of minor elements than do sandstones or limestones (Turekian and Wedepohl, 1961, table 2). However, many fine-grained sedimentary rocks and unconsolidated sediments that are rich in car­ bonaceous matter, such as black shales and euxinic muds of modern seas, contain unusually high concentrations of minor elements (Krauskopf, 1955). In the Mansfeld district of Germany, the Kupferschiefer, a bed of black shale about 1 meter thick, has been mined for copper for centuries. Locally, the same bed or its equivalent contains economic concentrations of lead, zinc, silver, and other metals. Copper is also produced from a black shale of Precambrian age in northern Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Dictionary of the Level II Aggregated Forest Soil Condition Database AFSCDB.LII.2.2
    Data dictionary of the Level II aggregated forest soil condition database AFSCDB.LII.2.2 based on Fleck, S., Cools, N., De Vos, B., Meesenburg, H., Fischer, R. (2016): The Level II aggregated forest soil condition database links soil physicochemical and hydraulic properties with long-term observations of forest condition in Europe 1 Data Dictionary for the Aggregated Forest Soil Condition Database of the Level II, Second Soil Survey (AFSCDB.LII.2.2) This data dictionary shall provide a direct link to the measurement methods applied for those of the 252 variables in the database that were defined by measurement protocols or code lists. The table below contains all variables in alphabetical order with reference to the database tables they are used in (. Direct links to the different sources of information are offered in its last column. The bibliographic information of the references is given below the table with corresponding numbers. In the case that different versions of a literature source are needed to exactly describe the methods, the number of the source is followed by a minor case letter (1a, 1b, etc.). Variable Name Description Unit Sources bdest Estimated bulk density of the kg m-3 4 (SOM) fine earth bdsample Mean dry soil bulk density of kg m-3 4 (SWR) fine earth of the samples (Cools and De Vos 2010) bs Base saturation of the horizon % 3 (PFH, SOM) [(exchangeable Ca+Mg+K+Na)/cation exchange capacity * 100] bulk_density Mean bulk density of fine kg m-3 4 (SOM, SWA) earth carbonates Carbonate content g kg-1 4 (SOM) cn C:N ratio:
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of CARBONATE RESERVOIRS the Identifi Cation, Description, and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in Carbonate Rocks
    GEOLOGY OF CARBONATE RESERVOIRS The Identifi cation, Description, and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in Carbonate Rocks WAYNE M. AHR Texas A&M University A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION GEOLOGY OF CARBONATE RESERVOIRS GEOLOGY OF CARBONATE RESERVOIRS The Identifi cation, Description, and Characterization of Hydrocarbon Reservoirs in Carbonate Rocks WAYNE M. AHR Texas A&M University A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION Copyright © 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, 201-748-6011, fax 201-748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permiossion. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifi cally disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fi tness for a particular purpose.
    [Show full text]