DOCSLIB.ORG

Security Council Official Records

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Security Council Official Records UNITED NATIONS . SECURITY COUNCIL OFFICIAL RECORDS THIRTY-FIFTH YEAR 2222naMEETING: 20 MAY 1980 NEW YORK CONTENTS Page Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2222) . 1 Adoption of the agenda . ..*.............................. 1. The situation in the occupied Arab territories: Letter dated 16 May 1980 from the Permanent Representative of Jdrdan to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/13941) . 1 SlPV.2222 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters com- bined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. Documents of the Security Council (symbol S/ . .) are normally published in quarterly Supplements of the Oficial Records of the Security Council. The date of the document indicates the supplement in which it appears or in which infor- mation about it is given. The resolutions of the Security Council, numbered in accordance with a system adopted in 1964, are published in yearly volumes of Resolutions and Decisions of the Security Council. The new system, which has been applied retroactively to resolutions adopted before 1 January 1965, became fully operative. on that date. 2222nd MEETING Held in New York on Tuesday, 20 May 1980, at 12 noon. President: Mr. Id6 OUMAROU (Niger). “I have the honour to request that the Security Council extend an invitation to the Permanent Present: The representatives of the following States: Observer for the Palestine Liberation Organization Bangladesh, China, France, German Democratic to participate in the consideration of the item entitled Republic, Jamaica, Mexico, Niger, Norway, Philip- ‘The situation in the occupied Arab territories’, in pines, Portugal, Tunisia, Union of Soviet Socialist accordance with the Council’s usual practice.” Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Zambia. 3. The proposal by the representative of Tunisia is not made pirsuantto rule 37 or rule 39 of the pro- Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/2222) visional rules of procedure, but, if approved by the Council, the invitation to participate in the debate 1. Adoption of the agenda would confer on the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) the same rights of participation as those 2. The situation in the occupied Arab territories: enjoyed by a Member State when invited to participate Letter dated 16 May 1980 from the Permanent under rule 37. Representative of Jordan to the United Na- tions addressed to the President of the Secu- 4. Does any member of the Council wish to speak on rity Council (S/13941) this proposal? The meeting was called to order at 12.15 p.m. 5. Mr. vanden HEUVEL (United States of America): The United States delegation has repeatedly made Adoption of the agenda clear our view that it is inappropriate for the Council to invite the Palestine Liberation Organization to The agenda was adopted. participate in the debate on terms that some seek to interpret as conferring rights of participation as if it The situation in the occupied Arab territories: were a Member State. For this reason, we will vote Letter dated 16 May 1980 from the Permanent Repre- against the manner in which this invitation is phrased. sentative of Jordan to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/13941) 6. The PRESIDENT (interpretation from French): If no other member of the Council wishes to speak at 1. The PRESIDENT (interpretation from French): this stage, I shall take it that the Council is ready to I should like to inform the members of the Council vote on the proposal of Tunisia. that I have received letters from the representatives of Israel and Jordan, in which they request to be A vote was taken by show of hands. invited to participate in the discussion of the item on the agenda. In accordance with the usual practice, In favour: Bangladesh, China, German Democratic I propose, with the consent of the Council, to invite Republic, Jamaica, Mexico, Niger, Philippines, those representatives to participate in the discussion, Tunisia, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Zambia without the right to vote, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Charter and rule 37 of the Against: United States of America provisional rules of procedure. Abstaining: France, Norway, Portugal, United At the invitation of the President, Mr. Nuseibeh Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Jordan) took a place at the Council table; Mr. Blum The proposal was adopted by 10 votes to I, with (Israel) took the place reserved for him at the side of 4 abstentions. the Council chamber. At the invitation of the President, Mr. Terzi (Pal- 2. The PRESIDENT (interpretation from French): estine Liberation Organization) took a place at the I should like to inform the members of the Council Council table. that I have received a letter, dated 16 May, from the representative of Tunisia [S/13950], which reads as 7. The PRESIDENT (interpretation from French): follows: I should also like to inform members of the Council 1 that I have received a letter dated 16 May from the and deportation, in the bleak darkness of one hour representative of Tunisia [S/13942], which reads as after midnight, of the Mayor’ of Al-Khalil, Fahd follows: Qawasma, the Mayor of Halhoul, Mohamed Milhem, and Sheikh Rajab Bayyoud Attamimi, from their “I have the honour to request that the Security homes and homeland. Council invite Mr. Fahd Qawasma, Mayor of Al- Khalil, Mr. Mohamed Milhem, Mayor of Halhoul 14. The Council has been seized of a proliferation of and Mr. Rajab Attamimi, Sharia Judge of Al-Khalil, items which are neither disparate nor, indeed, all- to participate in the Council’s consideration of the embracing. They are symptomatic and an embodiment item entitled ‘The situation in the occupied Arab of a fiendish design being unravelled day in, day out, territories’, in accordance with rule 39 of the provi- to achieve the total national obliteration of the Arab sional rules of procedure.” people of Palestine and to supplant them by an alien Zionist presence. Unless I hear any objection, I shall take it that the Council agrees to this request. 15. The deportation of the three Palestinian per- sonages, in flagrant violation of all norms of interna- It was so decided. tional law and conventions, and in audacious defiance of a categorical Council decision adopted a mere 8. The PRESIDENT (interpretation from French): 12 days ago, has made it more imperative than ever The Security Council is meeting today in response before that the Council should take stock of the full to the letter dated 16 May from the representative of dimensions of a Zionist ideology and onslaught which Jordan addressed to the President of the Council, are unquestionably unique in the post-war world and which was circulated as document S/13941. unparalleled since the inception of the United Nations. 16. The question is not, the deportation of three 9. Members of the Council have before them docu- Palestinian Arab leaders in the occupied West Bank ment S/13938, which contains the text of the report and Gaza, grave as that is, for 1,600 other leaders by the Secretary-General under Council resolution 468 had already been deported, including the Mayor of (1980). Members also have before them document Arab Jerusalem, Mr. Rouhi Al-Khatib, as a prelude to S/13949, which contains the text of a draft resolution the annexation of the Holy City of Jerusalem. They that has been prepared in the course of consultations. were ail deported across uninhabited wastes at Wadi Araba in Jordan to face an encounter with death 10. The first speaker is the representative of Jordan, through thirst, hunger and exhaustion; or across the on whom I call. rugged mountains of our sister country Lebanon and, significantly, through the strip controlled by the 11. Mr. NUSEIBEH (Jordan): Mr. President, I wish renegade henchman and quisling of the Zionist entity, to take this occasion of speaking before the Council Haddad, in the earnest hope that some bullets or this month to express my sincere congratulations to mines could achieve the murder of the deportees. you, the Ambassador of the friendly country of the I was told yesterday that, in the operation rooms from Niger, on your assumption of the presidency of the which all the violence in southern Lebanon erupts, Council. Your wisdom, statesmanship and dedication Hebrew is the only language spoken, while that are widely acknowledged. renegade Saad Haddad claims that he is fighting for the integrity of Lebanon. The deportees were also 12. It is my privilege also to commend in the highest sent across the River Jordan, where their Jordanian terms Ambassador Muiioz Ledo of the friendly coun- brethren could and would only be expected to give try of Mexico for the exemplary manner in which he then the tender embrace befitting their nearest kin. had presided over the work of the Council during the month of April. 17. And, at the grass-roots level, almost 300,000 people from both the Gaza Strip and the West Bank 13. Over the past two months the Council has been are, as a result of intimidation, force and the use of seized of grave issues pertaining to the question of loudspeakers booming threats of genocide against Palestine and the inextricably related problems, anyone who remained home, at present displaced tragedies and aggressions arising therefrom: the persons in the East Bank awaiting the implementation relentless, massive and ongoing devouring of the of United Nations resolutions which since 1967 have remnants of the Palestinian people’s national and called for their return to their homes. ancestral homeland; the recurring aggressions simi- larly ongoing and destructive against the independent 18.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ur World Is Moving Much Faster Than It Did When My Mother Began Writing
    SINCE 1976 Shutterstock/ChameleonsEye JUNE 2021 | SIVAN-TAMUZ 5781 By Shani Sorko-Ram Ferguson ur world is moving much faster than longer-lasting issues and showcases what the it did when my mother began writing Maoz team is doing on the ground in Israel. the Maoz Israel Report some 45 years ago. Though the term “prayer letter” may bring OAt that time, news from Israel was virtually a certain image to mind, we get a lot of impossible to get, and so monthly updates comments on the uniqueness of our prayer were invaluable to our readers. Today the letter. Why do we cover the topics we cover? news changes not only daily but sometimes How do we come at things from such a hourly. More than once we’ve written about different angle? The simple answer is things a topic, only to have to edit it significantly look different when you’re an Israeli living just before it went to print because the reality in Israel. And while I don’t get to personally on the ground had changed. thank every person who gives and prays To resolve this, we have shifted breaking news for our work here, I can offer a gift in and prayer updates to weekly emails while the return–a window into our daily lives as monthly Maoz Israel Report—which goes out Israelis, as believers, as a family, as a ministry both in print and online—addresses deeper, team—as pioneers. By Mail: By Phone: By Email: Online: Follow: Maoz Ministries U.S. 214.677.0560 [email protected] www.maozisrael.org maozisrael1 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Experience in Lebanon, 1982-1985
    THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE IN LEBANON, 1982-1985 Major George C. Solley Marine Corps Command and Staff College Marine Corps Development and Education Command Quantico, Virginia 10 May 1987 ABSTRACT Author: Solley, George C., Major, USMC Title: Israel's Lebanon War, 1982-1985 Date: 16 February 1987 On 6 June 1982, the armed forces of Israel invaded Lebanon in a campaign which, although initially perceived as limited in purpose, scope, and duration, would become the longest and most controversial military action in Israel's history. Operation Peace for Galilee was launched to meet five national strategy goals: (1) eliminate the PLO threat to Israel's northern border; (2) destroy the PLO infrastructure in Lebanon; (3) remove Syrian military presence in the Bekaa Valley and reduce its influence in Lebanon; (4) create a stable Lebanese government; and (5) therefore strengthen Israel's position in the West Bank. This study examines Israel's experience in Lebanon from the growth of a significant PLO threat during the 1970's to the present, concentrating on the events from the initial Israeli invasion in June 1982 to the completion of the withdrawal in June 1985. In doing so, the study pays particular attention to three aspects of the war: military operations, strategic goals, and overall results. The examination of the Lebanon War lends itself to division into three parts. Part One recounts the background necessary for an understanding of the war's context -- the growth of PLO power in Lebanon, the internal power struggle in Lebanon during the long and continuing civil war, and Israeli involvement in Lebanon prior to 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Intensity Conflict in Southern Lebanon: Lessons and Dynamics of the Israeli-Shi'ite War* by W. Andrew Ter Rill
    Summer 1987 Low Intensity Conflict in Southern Lebanon: Lessons and Dynamics of the Israeli-Shi'ite War* by W. Andrew Ter rill INTRODUCTION The short but intense military history of the state of Israel has pro­ duced a vast amount of material to be studied when considering the pro­ blems of modern military conflict. This material has often been characterized by dramatic Israeli military victories which are followed by precise and effective policies of military occupation. A more recent chapter in Israel's military history is, however, substantially less im­ pressive. It involves Israel's struggle to control the 1983-85 Shi'ite Moslem insurgency of southern Lebanon. In this conflict the Israelis fac­ ed military and civil-military relations problems which ultimately proved unsolvable for them. The purpose of this article is to present an overview of the problems of the occupation of southern Lebanon as well as the Israeli response to these problems. In this way, many lessons of the conflict should become apparent. Throughout this analysis, special emphasis will be given to Israeli policies which may have inadvertently helped to alienate the Shi'ite population of southern Lebanon from the occupying forces. Since the Shi'ites were not openly antagonistic toward Israel at the beginning of the occupation, special problems associated with the management of the occupation assume a critical importance in discovering how the Shi'ite war became one of the most disastrous chapters in Israeli military history. It also serves as an example of how an occupying force can deceive itself on the psychology and potential motivations of a civilian population within their area of control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taif Accord and Lebanon's Struggle to Regain Its Sovereignty
    American University International Law Review Volume 6 | Issue 1 Article 3 1990 The aiT f Accord and Lebanon's Struggle to Regain its Sovereignty Sandra M. Saseen Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Saseen, Sandra M. "The aiT f Accord and Lebanon's Struggle to Regain its Sovereignty." American University International Law Review 6, no. 1 (1990): 57-75. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TAIF ACCORD AND LEBANON'S STRUGGLE TO REGAIN ITS SOVEREIGNTY Sandra M. Saseen* INTRODUCTION There are no hopeless situations; there are only men who have grown hopeless about them. Clare Boothe Luce Fifteen years of civil war and foreign military intervention in Leba- non has resulted in a terrible loss of human life, many casualties, and massive physical destruction.' Lebanon is a country occupied by two states, Syria2 and Israel,3 and victimized by two revolutions.' Israel and Syria are antagonists who limit the violence of their confrontation to Lebanon. Meanwhile, the Palestinian and Iranian revolutions have fo- * J.D. Candidate, 1990, Washington College of Law, The American University. The author wishes to express her gratitude to Professors Claudio M. Grossman and Nicholas N.
    [Show full text]
  • Spain, Lebanon and UNIFIL
    Spain, Lebanon and UNIFIL George Emile Irani 20/5/2008 WP 21/2008 Spain, Lebanon and UNIFIL George Emile Irani Summary This study provides a historical and political background to the situation in South Lebanon since 1967. It then assesses the causes and results of the war in the summer of 2006 and its implications for local, regional and global politics. It also focuses on Spain’s military involvement in Lebanon, especially on the relationship between the Spanish UNIFIL contingent and the local population in South Lebanon. This paper includes a set of recommendations related to the future of Spain’s involvement in peacekeeping efforts in South Lebanon. Introduction Spain’s involvement and interest in Lebanon are not new. Throughout the centuries Spain has been present in Lebanon with its educational, religious and economic interests. There is a small community of Spanish citizens living in Lebanon, mostly married to Lebanese citizens. There is also a community of Lebanese who live in Spain and some have acquired the country’s citizenship. Mention should also be made of the tragic death of the Spanish Ambassador Pedro Manuel de Arístegui during the civil war in Lebanon in 1989. Arístegui was the third foreign diplomat (the other two were the US Ambassador Francis Meloy Jr and the French Ambassador Louis Delamarre) to lose his life during the 15-year civil war in Lebanon.1 In this study I will provide a historical and political background to the situation in South Lebanon since 1967. The role of Hezbollah, its religious, military and political philosophy and strategy in Lebanon and in the region will also be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Locals Rule: Historical Lessons for Creating Local Defense Forces For
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. LOCALS RULE Historical Lessons for Creating Local Defense Forces for Afghanistan and Beyond Austin Long, Stephanie Pezard, Bryce Loidolt, Todd C.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon's Legacy of Political Violence
    LEBANON Lebanon’s Legacy of Political Violence A Mapping of Serious Violations of International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in Lebanon, 1975–2008 September 2013 International Center Lebanon’s Legacy of Political Violence for Transitional Justice Acknowledgments The Lebanon Mapping Team comprised Lynn Maalouf, senior researcher at the Memory Interdisciplinary Research Unit of the Center for the Study of the Modern Arab World (CEMAM); Luc Coté, expert on mapping projects and fact-finding commissions; Théo Boudruche, international human rights and humanitarian law consultant; and researchers Wajih Abi Azar, Hassan Abbas, Samar Abou Zeid, Nassib Khoury, Romy Nasr, and Tarek Zeineddine. The team would like to thank the committee members who reviewed the report on behalf of the university: Christophe Varin, CEMAM director, who led the process of setting up and coordinating the committee’s work; Annie Tabet, professor of sociology; Carla Eddé, head of the history and international relations department; Liliane Kfoury, head of UIR; and Marie-Claude Najm, professor of law and political science. The team extends its special thanks to Dima de Clerck, who generously shared the results of her fieldwork from her PhD thesis, “Mémoires en conflit dans le Liban d’après-guerre: le cas des druzes et des chrétiens du Sud du Mont-Liban.” The team further owes its warm gratitude to the ICTJ Beirut office team, particularly Carmen Abou Hassoun Jaoudé, Head of the Lebanon Program. ICTJ thanks the European Union for their support which made this project possible. International Center for Transitional Justice The International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) works to redress and prevent the most severe violations of human rights by confronting legacies of mass abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in Partial Fulfil
    THE DAHIYEH DOCTRINE: THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH STATES CAN ESTABLISH ASYMMETRIC DETERRENCE A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Rafael D. Frankel, M.S. Washington, DC July 3, 2013 Copyright 2013 by Rafael D. Frankel All Rights Reserved ii THE DAHIYEH DOCTRINE: THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH STATES CAN ESTABLISH ASYMMETRIC DETERRENCE Rafael D. Frankel, M.S. Thesis Advisor: Daniel L. Byman, Ph.D. ABSTRACT For the last decade, a growing body of research has sough to understand how classical deterrence methods could be adapted by states to establish asymmetric deterrence against non-state militant groups. Various strategies were suggested, but the research undertaken to date focused nearly exclusively on the actions of the defending state. This research project is the first formal effort to discover under what conditions deterrence against such groups can be established by focusing on important attributes of the non-state groups themselves. The result is the development of the Asymmetric Deterrence Matrix (ADM), which in eight temporally-bound case studies involving Hamas and Hezbollah successfully predicts the level of deterrence Israel should have been able to achieve against those groups at given periods of time. This research demonstrates that there are four main causal factors related to a non-state group’s characteristics that constrain and encourage the success of asymmetric deterrence strategies by states: elements of statehood (territorial control, political authority, and responsibility for a dependent population), organizational structure, ideology, and inter- factional rivalries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Question of the Military in Lebanon
    The Question Juan Rial of the Military in Lebanon Roman ruins in the city of Tyre in a state of abandonment. Lebanese Armed Forces checkpoint in the south of the country. Makeshift camp for Syrian refugees in the Marjayoun region. The Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) are at the center of the security situation in Lebanon today. The support of central countries through an International Conference for assistance programs, the donation of four billion dollars from Saudi Arabia for the purchase of military equip- ment, and the operations carried out in the face of the advances of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - ISIS - in the border zone with Syria, are some of the pieces that constitute the scene. SERIES PEACE& SECURITY Presented here is the vision of a Latin American analyst with experience in the processes of the reconfi guration of military forces following the dictatorships, and the change in the regional and international scene produced by the disappearance of the internal and external Soviet empire. SERIES PEACE& SECURITY About the author: Juan Rial is a political analyst and consultant to international organizations, such as the United Nations Development Program, the Inter-American Development Bank, International IDEA, and the Organization of American States. Rial is a founding member of RESDAL and a member of the Board of Directors. He was a professor of Political Science at UDELAR (Universidad de la Republica) and of ORT University, both in Montevideo. He is an author of a dozen books and over a hundred articles on themes related to democracy, institutions, security and defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebanon and Israel
    TOWARDS A CHRISTIAN UNDERSTANDING OF ISRAEL LEBANON AND ISRAEL BBC Media coverage of Israel’s occupation and now withdrawal from the South Lebanon Security Zone, and her replacement by triumphant Hizbollah fighters, while ‘happy villagers’ returned to their homes has generally portrayed Israel as an illegal occupying force. It was not explained why thousands of Lebanese have been fleeing into Israel before the advancing Hizbollah Lebanon’s tragic history since 1970, and more particularly since Israel’s entry into Lebanon during the Peace for Galilee operation in the Spring of 1982, has been grossly misrepresented by the western media. Sometimes this misrepresentation was because sympathetic journalists in Beirut were murdered by the PLO, sometimes because accurate reporting was not judged to be good copy by their western editors. 6 The level of deliberate distortion was almost unique. A typical example was recorded by one TV viewer who said: “On TV news I saw that Israel had almost completely destroyed Nabatiye. Then I went to Lebanon and saw Nabatiye. Yes, a few buildings were destroyed and weeds were growing inside. - these buildings had been destroyed during the past seven years by the civil war and the PLO (and not by Israel).” The International Red Cross initially claimed that 10,000 civilians had been killed or wounded in southern Lebanon following Israel’s action in June 1982. Lebanese Mayors and Government doctors gave a figure of around 460 dead and 1,100 wounded. 4 Countless other examples from the western media indicated a cynical disregard for reporting accuracy. Up to 1982 the PLO had been developing Lebanon as a base for international terrorism, with many training schools for terrorists from all over the world being located in refugee camps in S.Lebanon 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • They Called Them Terrorists During the South Lebanon Occupation
    THEY CALLED THEM TERRORISTS DURING THE SOUTH LEBANON OCCUPATION J O S É E L A M B E R T They Called Them Terrorists during the south lebanon occupation 1 Extrait de la publication THEY CALLED THEM TERRORISTS DURING THE SOUTH LEBANON OCCUPATION 2 Extrait de la publication THEY CALLED THEM TERRORISTS DURING THE SOUTH LEBANON OCCUPATION They Called Them Terrorists during the south lebanon ocupation 3 Extrait de la publication THEY CALLED THEM TERRORISTS DURING THE SOUTH LEBANON OCCUPATION Les Éditions Sémaphore 3962, Henri-Julien Avenue Montreal (Quebec) h2w 2k2 514 281-1594 [email protected] www.editionssemaphore.qc.ca isbn : 978-2-923107-01-2 (papier) trilingual publication isbn : 978-2-923107-88-2 (pdf)- english isbn : 978-2-923107-89-9 (epub)- english © Les Éditions Sémaphore and Josée Lambert, 2004 Legal Deposit: BAnQ and BAC, 2004 Diffusion Dimedia www.dimedia.com/ Distribution du Nouveau-Monde www.librairieduquebec.fr/ Electronic publishing: Jean Yves Collette, Anne-Marie Arel [email protected] 4 THEY CALLED THEM TERRORISTS DURING THE SOUTH LEBANON OCCUPATION J O S É E L A M B E R T They Called Them Terrorists during the south lebanon ocupation 5 Extrait de la publication THEY CALLED THEM TERRORISTS DURING THE SOUTH LEBANON OCCUPATION 6 Extrait de la publication ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. In 1995, I discovered South Lebanon: an isolated, relatively unknown area in the midst of complex regional tensions. I could never have grasped the situation and worked there without the help and hospitality of the following families: the Mansouris, the Cheikh Husseins and the Akhrass-Mourads in Montreal and Aitaroun, the Dahers in Brossard and Nabatiyeh and the Akhdar- Fahs in Montreal and Jibchit.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Zionism and U.S
    A CONGRUENCE OF INTERESTS: CHRISTIAN ZIONISM AND U.S. POLICY TOWARD ISRAEL, 1977-1998 Kyle M. Smith A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2006 Committee: Gary R. Hess, Advisor Judith Sealander ii Abstract Dr. Gary Hess, Advisor This thesis examines the phenomenon of political Christian Zionism and its influence on U.S. policy toward Israel from 1977 to 1998. While there is a vast literature on America Middle East policy and the relationship between the U.S. and Israel; relatively little attention has been given to the actions of Christian evangelicals on behalf of Israel. Motivated by an eschatological system called dispensationalism, these Christian Zionists supported Israel through a variety of activities, including direct lobbying at the congressional level. Forming alliances with the Jewish pro-Israel lobby and the Israeli Likud party, Christian Zionists were active in pressuring Congress to oppose arms sales to Arab countries and gaining recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. The rise to political prominence of the Christian Right during the 1980s and 1990s facilitated the growth and influence of Christian Zionist efforts, connecting dispensationalism to political power as never before. While scholars in the field of diplomatic history have noted the strategic and economic concerns that drove U.S. policy toward Israel, as well as the influence of the American Jewish community and its lobby, they have failed to adequately understand or integrate the profound political actions of Christian Zionists. By examining the role that Christian Zionism has had in the myriad of factors that have influenced U.S.
    [Show full text]