Lesson Plans for Teaching English and American Studies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Historical” Nixon Tapes”, President Richard Nixon, Washington Post and the New York Times, and Dan Elsberg
Historical” Nixon Tapes”, President Richard Nixon, Washington Post and The New York Times, and Dan Elsberg NIXON TAPES: "Get the Son of a B*tch" Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) President Richard Nixon talks with his Attorney General John Mitchell about the leaked secret government documents about the Vietnam War, the Pentagon Papers. They first discuss the position of FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, who did not want to investigate the leaker, Daniel Ellsberg, because of his friendship with Ellsberg's father-in-law. Nixon descries some of the "softheads" in his administration who want him to go easy on Ellsberg. He notes that they need to "get the son of a b*tch" or else "wholesale thievery" would happen all over the government. The president feels that the P.R. might not be bad on their part, because people don't like thieves. (Photo: President Richard Nixon and his wife First Lady Pat Nixon walk with Gerald and Betty Ford to the helicopter Marine One on the day of Nixon's resignation from the presidency.) Uploaded on Aug 26, 2008 John Mitchell 006-021 June 29, 1971 White House Telephone NIXON TAPES: Angry at the New York Times (Haldeman) President Richard Nixon talks with his Chief of Staff H. R. (Bob) Haldeman about the press. In particular, he tells Haldeman about Henry Kissinger urging him to do an interview with New York Times reporter James (Scotty) Reston, Sr. Nixon, however, banned all interviews with the New York Times after the paper released the Pentagon Papers and ran an interview that Nixon disliked with Chinese leader Chou Enlai. -
How Courageous Followers Stand up to Destructive Leadership a Thesis
Breaking Toxic Triangles: How Courageous Followers stand up to Destructive Leadership A Thesis Presented to the Swinburne University of Technology in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of: DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2020 by Alain Marc Mario de Sales Principal Co-Ordinating Supervisor : Dr. Samir Shrivastava Associate Supervisor : Prof. Christopher Selvarajah Associate Supervisor : Prof. Timothy Moore Abstract Instances of Destructive Leadership abound. It is a growing phenomenon with very real consequences and yet it remains under-researched. The scant work that exists on Destructive Leadership tends to focus on leaders and generally discounts the role of followers. Responding to calls for models which recognise that outcomes are often co-created by leaders and followers, this study explores how followers stand up to leaders to mitigate destructive outcomes. This study anchors its arguments to the Toxic Triangle framework (Padilla 2013), which focuses on the confluence of Destructive Leaders, Susceptible Followers, and Conducive Environments. The insights from this study augment the Toxic Triangle by adding Courageous Followers to the framework. Using Power and Structuration theories as theoretical lenses, the study analyses the discursive actions undertaken by Courageous Followers to shift the power balance while attempting to collapse the Toxic Triangle. The study analyses twelve longitudinal episodes from three cases of Destructive Leadership that spanned decades. Given that the cases entailed shifts in power balance and the fact that discourse and power are said to be indistinguishable from each other and mutually constitute each other, the study adopted Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as a method. CDA explored the tension between agency and structure as the power balance shifted. -
Why Didn't Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NSU Works Nova Law Review Volume 18, Issue 3 1994 Article 7 Why Didn’t Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate Stephen E. Ambrose∗ ∗ Copyright c 1994 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Ambrose: Why Didn't Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Waterga Why Didn't Nixon Bum the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate Stephen E. Ambrose* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................... 1775 II. WHY DID THEY BREAK IN? ........... 1776 III. WHO WAS DEEP THROAT? .......... .. 1777 IV. WHY DIDN'T NIXON BURN THE TAPES? . 1778 V. VICE PRESIDENT FORD AND THE PARDON ........ 1780 I. INTRODUCTION For almost two years, from early 1973 to September, 1974, Watergate dominated the nation's consciousness. On a daily basis it was on the front pages-usually the headline; in the news magazines-usually the cover story; on the television news-usually the lead. Washington, D.C., a town that ordinarily is obsessed by the future and dominated by predictions about what the President and Congress will do next, was obsessed by the past and dominated by questions about what Richard Nixon had done and why he had done it. Small wonder: Watergate was the political story of the century. Since 1974, Watergate has been studied and commented on by reporters, television documentary makers, historians, and others. These commentators have had an unprecedented amount of material with which to work, starting with the tapes, the documentary record of the Nixon Administration, other material in the Nixon Presidential Materials Project, plus the transcripts of the various congressional hearings, the courtroom testimony of the principal actors, and the memoirs of the participants. -
ALL the PRESIDENT's MEN by William Goldman Based on The
ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN by William Goldman Based on the novel "All The President's Men" by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward Pre-rehearsal version March, 1975 Start with as few credits as possible. When they're over-- FADE IN ON: A TINY BLACK PIECE OF TAPE. We see it in the center of the large, dimly lit screen. As the tape is pressed around a door-- BEGIN THE BREAK-IN SEQUENCE. It's a major piece of action, running maybe five minutes and it's all as detailed and accurate as we can make it, with as many "if only's" included as possible. ("If only" the tape had been attached up and down instead of around the door, Wills wouldn't have spotted it and alerted the police; "if only" the first police car called had gone to investigate, Baldwin, watching from the Howard Johnson Motor Inn, would have seen their uniforms and radioed Hunt and Liddy in time for them to have gotten to the five burglars and then safely away.) The break-in ends when Leeper arrests the five men. He thought he only had one guy, so when ten hands were raised he was surprised. The hands are all encased in Playtex rubber surgical gloves. HOLD on the hands a moment; then-- GO TO: A DARK APARTMENT. The phone rings. WOODWARDfumbles for the receiver, turns on the bed light. He listens a moment. WOODWARD No, no trouble, Harry, be right down. (he hangs up) Son of a bitch. He lies back. The apartment is one room, a small terrace beyond. -
July 1-15, 1971
RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 7/15/1971 A Appendix “A” 2 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 7/3/1971 A Appendix “A” 3 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 7/5/1971 A Appendix “A” 4 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 7/6/1971 A Appendix “B” COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER WHCF: SMOF: Office of Presidential Papers and Archives RC-8 FOLDER TITLE President Richard Nixon’s Daily Diary July 1, 1971 – July 15, 1971 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual’s F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D-DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION *U.S. GPO; 1989-235-084/00024 NA 14021 (4-85) THE WHITE HOUSE TIME DAY WASHINGTON, D. C. - 8:35 a.m. THURSDAY PHONE TIME P=Placed R=Received ACTIVITY Out 1.0 to 8:35 The President had breakfast. 8:41 The President went to the Oval Office. 8:41 8:45 The President met with his Deputy Assistant, Alexander P. Butterfield•. 8:45 9:18 The President met with his Assistant, H. -
Montana Kaimin, March 4, 1975 Associated Students of the University of Montana
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Associated Students of the University of Montana Montana Kaimin, 1898-present (ASUM) 3-4-1975 Montana Kaimin, March 4, 1975 Associated Students of the University of Montana Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper Recommended Citation Associated Students of the University of Montana, "Montana Kaimin, March 4, 1975" (1975). Montana Kaimin, 1898-present. 6354. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper/6354 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (ASUM) at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Kaimin, 1898-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Concert attendants get new liquor check By Jeannie Young said, adding that policemen from the side or outside of the concerts, we concert, you should be able to drink. Kelly said she had attended five UM Montana Kaimin Reporter Missoula County Sheriff’s Office have to check it out. I don’t think they had any right to be concerts and had never been narcotics division were at the there." searched before. "We don’t keep a gigantic list of all For the first time, persons attending concert. University of Montana concerts were the people smoking marijuana. We searched at the Field House door Bogue said Program Council did not would get writer’s cramp." instead of the ticket gate. request that narcotics officers attend the concert. -
Hadley Roff Hadley Roff: a Life in Politics, Government and Public Service
Oral History Center University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Hadley Roff Hadley Roff: A Life in Politics, Government and Public Service Interviews conducted by Lisa Rubens in 2012 and 2013 Copyright © 2017 by The Regents of the University of California Oral History Center, The Bancroft Library, University of California Berkeley ii Since 1954 the Oral History Center of the Bancroft Library, formerly the Regional Oral History Office, has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Hadley Roff dated June 21, 2013. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. -
The Week That Changed the World Part I
Nixon Legacy Forum Transcript: The Week That Changed the World Part I October 13, 2010 University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA Panelists: Colonel Jack Brennan, Marine Corps Aide to the President Dwight Chapin, Deputy Special Assistant to the President and Acting Chief of Protocol during President Nixon's 1972 trip to China Larry Higby, Assistant Chief-of-Staff to the President Clayton Dube (Moderator), Associate Director of the USC U.S.-China Institute Clayton Dube: Hi. My name is Clayton Dube, and it's my privilege to be from on the USC U.S.-China Institute. And it's a big week here at USC. On Friday, we are going to be inaugurating C.L. “Max” Nikias as the 11th president of the university. While he was provost, Max Nikias established the USC U.S.-China Institute, expressly to focus on the U.S.-China relationship in all its dimensions, how it was changing, why it mattered, and to look at critical trends in contemporary China. This focus on China remains a strategic priority here at USC. Unfortunately, President Nikias has another commitment and can't be with us today, but he asked that I extend to you his warmest of welcomes. And it's of course my pleasure to do just that. Thank you all for coming to today's symposium. We're going to be looking back at what went into making “the week that changed the world,” that week in February 1972 when President Nixon traveled to China. We are extremely fortunate to have a distinguished panel to speak on that subject. -
Impeachment Inquiry: William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States Presentation on Behalf of the President
IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY: WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT DECEMBER 8 AND 9, 1998 Serial No. 68 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 52±320 WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 1 VerDate 21-DEC-98 10:55 Jan 12, 1999 Jkt 053320 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\RENEE\53320P2.000 53320p PsN: 53320p COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts BOB BARR, Georgia ROBERT WEXLER, Florida WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas THOMAS BARRETT, Wisconsin EDWARD A. PEASE, Indiana CHRISTOPHER B. CANNON, Utah JAMES E. ROGAN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina MARY BONO, California (II) VerDate 21-DEC-98 10:55 Jan 12, 1999 Jkt 053320 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\RENEE\53320P2.000 53320p PsN: 53320p MAJORITY STAFF THOMAS E. -
Washington Decoded
Washington Decoded 11 June 2014 Naftali Reconsidered By Max Holland Since late April, Reuters, the Orange County Register, The Nation, Los Angeles Times, and The New Yorker have published articles lamenting the lack of a director at the Richard M. Nixon Library (RMNL) in Yorba Linda, California.[1] All the articles (excepting Jeffrey Frank’s slightly more nuanced New Yorker piece) have the same narrative, almost as if they were part of an orchestrated campaign. The uncommon delay in finding a new permanent director (going on three years) is the fault of Nixon partisans, so the story goes, who are holding out for a congenial person to rehabilitate the only president to resign in disgrace. And the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is being stymied in its admirable effort to present Nixon in an objective, unvarnished light. As proof, the articles reprise the conventional, heroic narrative about the tenure of Tim Naftali, who headed the library from 2007 to 2011. Naftali “presided over the installation of a new, historically accurate Watergate exhibit,” The Nation article said, which Nixon loyalists “vehemently objected to,” according to Reuters. That left Naftali “fiercely at odds with the . [Nixon] family and close supporters of the 37th president,” the Orange County Register reported. The Register also quoted Naftali to level the allegation that Nixon loyalists are consciously stalling so they can allegedly “write the text” for a pending $15 million renovation of the museum, which is the public face of the library, since most visitors to Yorba Linda do not use the archives. The Los Angeles Times article dispensed with a reporter and made these points in an article written by Naftali himself. -
President Richard Nixon's Daily Diary, September 1-15, 1971
RICHARD NIXON PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY DOCUMENT WITHDRAWAL RECORD DOCUMENT DOCUMENT SUBJECT/TITLE OR CORRESPONDENTS DATE RESTRICTION NUMBER TYPE 1 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 9/3/1971 A Appendix “A” 2 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 9/4/1971 A Appendix “B” 3 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 9/6/1971 A Appendix “A” 4 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 9/11/1971 A Appendix “B” 5 Manifest Helicopter Passenger Manifest – 9/12/1971 A Appendix “A” COLLECTION TITLE BOX NUMBER WHCF: SMOF: Office of Presidential Papers and Archives RC-8 FOLDER TITLE President Richard Nixon’s Daily Diary September 1, 1971 – September 15, 1971 PRMPA RESTRICTION CODES: A. Release would violate a Federal statute or Agency Policy. E. Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential commercial or B. National security classified information. financial information. C. Pending or approved claim that release would violate an individual’s F. Release would disclose investigatory information compiled for law rights. enforcement purposes. D. Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy G. Withdrawn and return private and personal material. or a libel of a living person. H. Withdrawn and returned non-historical material. DEED OF GIFT RESTRICTION CODES: D-DOG Personal privacy under deed of gift -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION *U.S. GPO; 1989-235-084/00024 NA 14021 (4-85) THE WESTERN WHITE HOUSE ~AN rT r.AUFORNTA PHONE TIME P=Placcd R=Rcccived ACTIVITY - In Out Lo LD 8:44 R The President was telephoned long distance by his daughter, Tricia, in New York City. The call was not completed. 9:00 The President had breakfast. -
Greetings, Class of 2020! Wow, It's Hard to Believe That Next Year You
Greetings, Class of 2020! Wow, it’s hard to believe that next year you will be taking your first “real” AP English class! We applaud you for accepting the challenge of a more rigorous course. Next year will be like no other, not just because it’s your first official year of AP English, but because it is a year full of nonfiction and argumentation. For much of the year, you will see a focus on the author’s argument in fiction or even a departure from traditional fiction. The type of writing and thinking that we will challenge you to do is the type that will transcend any English class and better prepare you for college and beyond. Our goal is to make you analytical readers who scrutinize, probe, and question texts; more polished writers who articulate with insight and flare; and, most importantly, global citizens who can critically think in almost any situation. “Question everything. The truth is out there.” In order to be prepared for the year, we are asking you to do a few things over the summer and continue them throughout the year. First, read, read, read. Reading is a skill, and with any skill the only way to get better is to continually practice. Just like you practice an instrument or sport, we encourage you to “practice” reading and encourage you to read things that you enjoy. Typically speaking, good readers are good writers. Secondly, read editorial writing. As we will focus on argumentation, editorials are a good source to see argumentation strategies at work.