Review of Police Pursuits Conducted by ACT Policing in the Australian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Police Pursuits Conducted by ACT Policing in the Australian Review of police pursuits conducted by ACT Policing Page 1 of 148 in the Australian Capital Territory CONTACT OFFICER FOR THIS REPORT Coordinator Ministerial, Policy & Performance ACT Policing GPO Box 401 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone: (02) 6264 9480 Email: [email protected] GENERAL CONTACT DETAILS Post Written requests for information can be sent to: Coordinator Ministerial, Policy & Performance ACT Policing GPO Box 401 Canberra ACT 2601 Telephone For general information about the AFP, telephone AFP National Headquarters on (02) 6131 3000. People who are hearing impaired can contact the AFP through telephone typewriter facility on (02) 6256 7700. For general enquiries regarding the content of this report please contact (02) 6264 9460. Internet Information about ACT Policing can be found at the ACT Policing website www.police.act.gov.au where an electronic version of this report can be found. For Freedom of Information requests contact (02) 6131 6131, [email protected] or go to afp.gov.au. © Commonwealth of Australia (Australian Federal Police) 2015 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from ACT Policing. Review of police pursuits conducted by ACT Policing Page 2 of 148 in the Australian Capital Territory CONTENTS TERMS OF REFERENCE .............................................................................................. 6 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................. 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 11 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................. 14 1. PREFACE ........................................................................................................... 21 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 27 2.1 PURPOSE .................................................................................................. 27 2.2 SCOPE ...................................................................................................... 27 2.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................. 28 2.4 CIRCULATION OF DRAFT .......................................................................... 28 3. CURRENT OPERATING CONTEXT ....................................................................... 29 3.1 PURSUITS & URGENT DUTY DRIVING ....................................................... 29 3.2 PROVISION OF ACT POLICING SERVICES TO THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY .............................................................................................. 30 3.3 ADEQUACY OF CURRENT OPERATIONAL PRACTICES ................................ 31 3.3.1 Review of Pursuits .............................................................................. 31 3.3.2 Review of compliance with the AFP Guideline ......................................... 35 3.3.3 Case Study Analysis ........................................................................... 45 3.3.4 Current AFP Governance Framework ..................................................... 52 3.3.5 ACT Policing - Police Pursuit Review Committee ..................................... 58 3.3.6 Workplace Health and Safety compliance .............................................. 61 3.4 ADEQUACY OF CURRENT LEGISLATION TO SANCTION OFFENDERS OR CHANGE BEHAVIOURS ........................................................................................... 61 3.4.1 ACT Policing prosecutions and court outcomes ........................................ 61 3.4.2 ACT Legislation pertaining to pursuits .................................................... 62 3.5 CURRENT AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGY .................................................. 65 3.5.1 Automated Vehicle Locator .................................................................. 65 3.5.2 Enterprise Mobility Solution project....................................................... 65 3.5.3 Emerging technologies ........................................................................ 66 4. JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW ................................................................................ 67 4.1 ANZPAA PURSUIT PRINCIPLES ................................................................ 67 4.2 JURISDICTIONAL COMPARISON............................................................... 67 4.2.1 Jurisdictional Review – New South Wales .............................................. 68 4.2.2. Jurisdictional Review - Queensland ....................................................... 70 4.2.3 Jurisdictional Review - Tasmania .......................................................... 71 4.2.4 Jurisdictional Review – Victoria ............................................................ 71 4.2.5 Other Jurisdictions .............................................................................. 72 5. RECENT CORONIAL INQUEST OUTCOMES .......................................................... 73 5.1 AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY .......................................................... 73 5.1.1 Benjamin Peter HAYES ........................................................................ 73 5.1.2 Clea Kathleen ROSE ............................................................................ 73 5.1.3 Heather Jean FREEMAN ....................................................................... 75 Review of police pursuits conducted by ACT Policing Page 3 of 148 in the Australian Capital Territory 5.1.4 Brody and Scott OPPELAAR, Samantha FORD & Justin WILLIAMS ............. 75 5.1.5 Linda COX ......................................................................................... 77 5.2 NEW SOUTH WALES ................................................................................. 78 5.2.1 Hamish RAJ ....................................................................................... 78 5.2.2 Syke SASSINE ................................................................................... 78 5.3 VICTORIA ................................................................................................. 80 5.3.1 Sarah Louise BOOTH ........................................................................... 80 5.4 CORONIAL OUTCOMES – LIMITED PURSUIT POLICY MODEL .................... 82 5.4.1 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 83 6. STAKEHOLDERS & INTEREST GROUPS .............................................................. 84 6.1 KEY GOVERNMENT STAKEHOLDERS .......................................................... 84 6.1.1 ACT Justice and Community Safety Directorate ...................................... 84 6.1.2 ACT Director of Public Prosecutions ....................................................... 84 6.1.3 ACT Policing Coroner’s Officer .............................................................. 84 6.2 COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................... 84 6.2.1 The Rose Family ................................................................................. 84 6.3 INTEREST GROUPS ................................................................................... 85 6.3.1 The Law Society of New South Wales .................................................... 85 6.3.2 Criminal Lawyers Association Northern Territory ..................................... 86 6.3.3 Alternative Law Journal ....................................................................... 86 6.3.4 John Cadogan .................................................................................... 86 7. LEGISLATIVE REFORM PROPOSAL ..................................................................... 88 7.1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 88 7.1.1 Background ........................................................................................ 88 7.1.2 Operational context ............................................................................ 88 7.1.3 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 89 7.2 PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE REFORMS .......................................................... 89 7.2.1 Context of reforms ............................................................................. 90 7.2.2 Progress of reforms ............................................................................ 91 7.3 PROPOSED PURSUIT LEGISLATION .......................................................... 91 7.4 OFFENCE - FAILING TO STOP ................................................................... 92 7.4.1 s.109 RT (Safety & Traffic Management) Regulation 2000 ....................... 93 7.4.2 New South Wales Legislation ............................................................... 94 7.4.3 Proposed amendment ......................................................................... 94 7.4.4 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 95 7.5 OFFENCES ARISING FROM PURSUITS ...................................................... 96 7.5.1 Dangerous Driving - Discussion ............................................................ 96 7.5.2 Furious, reckless and dangerous driving ................................................ 98 7.5.3
Recommended publications
  • ACT Policing Submission to the Inquiry Into Operational Response
    ACT Policing’s Submission to the Inquiry into the Operational Response to the January 2003 Bushfires May 2003 CONTENTS Preamble ...................................................................................................................3 The Role of Police Services in Emergencies ..........................................................5 Importance of preparation and training..................................................................7 ACT Policing responsibilities during the January ACT Bushfires .....................8 The January 2003 Bushfire emergency- a brief overview..................................10 ACT Policing’s Operational Response.................................................................23 Addressing the Terms of Reference .....................................................................26 1) the preparation, planning and response to the bushfires and of strategies for the evaluations and management of the bushfire threat and risk .........................26 2) ESB management structure, command and control arrangements, and public information strategy.............................................................................................29 3) the coordination and cooperative arrangements with other ACT and interstate, Commonwealth and non-government agencies, including utility providers, for managing such emergencies;.........................................................33 4) the adequacy of ESB equipment, communications’ systems, training and resources ..............................................................................................................33
    [Show full text]
  • AFP Platypus Annual 2019
    ANNUAL 2019 Contents Commissioner’s message The platypus has been adopted by the Australian 5 Federal Police as a symbol representing the diverse requirements placed on members in the execution of ANNUAL Keeping Australia Safe: Joint their duties. 2019 Counter Terrorism Team foil This unique and tenacious Australian animal is a Christmas plot 6 survivor against increasing pressure from today’s environment. It leaves no stone unturned in its daily pursuits and has equipped itself with a range of Keeping Australia Safe: Protecting features to adapt to changes over many years. children drives investigators 10 It is capable of passing unnoticed if required, yet it Cover images: Selected demonstrates an unfailing dedication to explore all photos from this edition. ACT Policing Snapshot 14 possibilities in an effort to maintain its special place in Australia’s environment. Busy 40th for AFP 16 Although generally a peaceful animal, the platypus is able to defend itself, if necessary, with a venomous The AFP 1979 - 2019 timeline 22 spur. This is done, at times, against larger and more powerful opponents—a quality admired and respected by members of the Australian Federal Police. Keeping Australia Safe: AFP tracks down financial fraudsters 26 Keeping Australia Safe: The largest meth seizure that almost never was 30 Surprise gift for the AFP’s 40th34 Edition 124 Editor: Dom Byrne Staying on track: AFP family Design: Metka Kosec AFP Media and Engagement honours Detective Sergeant Contributors: Alexia Boland, Gab Knowles, Mark Scott Dominic Lavers, Shelby Houghton & Joe 42 Marsden (AFP National Media). Terry Browne (AFP Museum). Emma Bailey (ACT Keeping Australia Safe: Policing) ISSN 1441-8061 Child protection team closes AFP Platypus Magazine is the journal of the Australian Federal Police.
    [Show full text]
  • AFP Annual Report 2019-20
    ANNUAL REPORT 2019–20 AFP Annual Report 2019–20 Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons Licence This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, which allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ The full licence terms are available from: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode The Commonwealth of Australia’s preference is that you attribute this publication (and any material sourced from it) using the following wording: Source: Licensed from the Commonwealth of Australia under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. ISSN 0728–4691 (print) ISSN 2202-7491 (online) © Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Federal Police, 2020 Aids to access Annual report contact officer Manager Audit, Statistics and Performance Contact phone number (02) 5126 0000 Contact email [email protected] Manager Audit, Statistics and Performance Contact address Australian Federal Police GPO Box 401, Canberra ACT 2601 Entity website (URL) www.afp.gov.au for all general information Freedom of information requests [email protected] Electronic versions of this and previous annual www.afp.gov.au/annualreport reports Details of accountable authority during the
    [Show full text]
  • Procedural Conflict and Conflict Resolution: a Cross-National Study of Police Officers from New Zealand and South Australia
    Procedural conflict and conflict resolution: a cross-national study of police officers from New Zealand and South Australia Ross Hendy Churchill College University of Cambridge This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2018 ii iii Declaration Tis dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the preface and specifed in the text. It is not the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or di- ploma or other qualifcation at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submit- ted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualifcation at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution. iv v Abstract Tis research takes a cross-national approach to explore how police officers attempt confict resolution in their day-to-day activities. Using comparisons of the behaviour of routinely armed officers from South Australia and routinely unarmed officers from New Zealand, this thesis chronicles a research journey which culminates with a new theoretical framework to explain police-citizen encounters. Te research took a grounded theory approach and employed a mixed methods design. Quantitative data revealed that officers from South Australia used verbal and physical control behaviours more frequently and for a higher proportion of time during encounters than dur- ing the encounters observed in New Zealand. Tere were no clear explanations for the differences, although there were variations in law and the profle of event-types between the research sites.
    [Show full text]
  • 100-Volunteer-Stories-Web-Version.Pdf
    100 Volunteer STORIES www.volunteeringact.org.au © Volunteering ACT Inc 2013. December 2013 Celebrating the contribution of Canberra’s Volunteers Proudly sponsored by Beyond Bank Australia FOREWORD BY MAUREEN CANE Chief Executive Officer of Volunteering ACT Australia’s capital has a proud record for volunteering since it was founded. Services to the swiftly growing population were often first provided by volunteers. Volunteering is now in Canberra’s DNA, with many of her citizens, young and old and from all walks of life, actively volunteering at any one time. This book tells some of their stories — of care for others, of courage, of generosity and of application of skills and expertise. The stories are a testimony to the excellent work of Canberra’s community-based organisations and to the selfless contribution of individuals towards the general good. One such story, of the generous application of expertise, is from Sarah Wilson, the volunteer who compiled this book for Volunteering ACT! All the stories are a fitting legacy for Canberra’s Centenary year and engender a sure and certain confidence that our Maureen Cane, Volunteering ACT CEO future is in good hands. AUSTRALIA’S CAPITAL has a proud record for volunteering since it was founded. Services to the swiftly growing population were often firstprovided by volunteers. FOREWORD BY MARY PORTER Member of the ACT Legislative Assembly and Founder of Volunteering ACT As we all know the ACT has one of the highest rates of volunteering in Australia. When I arrived in the ACT in 1977 I was introduced to the communities training program that was sponsored by the Mental Health arm of the, then, Health Commission and supported by ACTOSS & Lifeline ACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Arista a Report Concerning an Investigation Into the Queensland Police Service’S 50/50 Gender Equity Recruitment Strategy
    Investigation Arista A report concerning an investigation into the Queensland Police Service’s 50/50 gender equity recruitment strategy May 2021 February 2021 August 2020 ~ Crime and Corruption Commission ~ QUEENSLAND Investigation Arista A report concerning an investigation into the Queensland Police Service’s 50/50 gender equity recruitment strategy May 2021 ISBN: 978-1-876986-95-7 © The Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) 2021 Licence This publication is licensed by the Crime and Corruption Commission under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 International licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. 81· @ In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this publication, as long as you attribute the work to the Crime and Corruption Commission. For further information contact: [email protected] Attribution Content from this publication should be attributed as: The Crime and Corruption Commission - Investigation Arista: A report concerning an investigation into the Queensland Police Service’s 50/50 gender equity recruitment strategy. Disclaimer of Liability While every effort is made to ensure that accurate information is disseminated through this medium, the Crime and Corruption Commission makes no representation about the content and suitability of this information for any purpose. The information provided is only intended to increase awareness and provide general information on the topic. It does not constitute legal advice. The Crime and Corruption Commission does not accept responsibility for any actions undertaken based on the information contained herein. Crime and Corruption Commission GPO Box 3123, Brisbane, QLD, 4001 Phone: 07 3360 6060 Level 2, North Tower Green Square (toll-free outside Brisbane: 1800 061 611) 515 St Pauls Terrace Fax: 07 3360 6333 Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 Email: [email protected] Note: This publication is accessible through the CCC website <www.ccc.qld.gov.au>.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Australian Capital Territory Drug Diversion Programs.Pdf
    Evaluation of the Australian Capital Territory Drug Diversion Programs Caitlin Hughes1, Marian Shanahan1, Alison Ritter1, David McDonald2, and Florence Gray-Weale1 1 Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, The University of New South Wales 2 Social Research and Evaluation Pty Ltd Feb 2013 Acknowledgements A project of this nature required a considerable commitment from a large number of people, over a very small space of time. It would not have been possible without all of the ACT stakeholders who gave their time so generously. Particular thanks are due to the ACT Health Directorate for providing the opportunity to examine the ACT drug diversion system and all the roundtable participants: 24 different individuals across 3 roundtables in all (see Appendix A for details). The commitment to give so much time and to engage fully in the process was truly appreciated, and is a reflection of the commitment in the ACT towards improving responses to alcohol and drug-related offenders. Thanks also to all those who provided data and/or more detailed descriptions of processes, particularly: ACT Government Health Directorate, Alcohol and Other Drug Policy Unit ACT Government Health Directorate, Alcohol and Drug Services ACT Policing, Alcohol and Drug Diversion Coordinators ACT Policing, Performance, Evaluation and Review team Finally, we would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Carrie Fowlie, Executive Officer, Alcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Association ACT (ATODA), for advice and critical reflections throughout this project. It should be noted that all conclusions and recommendations are attributable to DPMP and Social Research and Evaluation, not to ATODA, and that any mistakes are those of the research team.
    [Show full text]
  • Agreement Between the ACT Minister for Police and Emergency Services
    Agreement between the ACT Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Australian Federal Police Commissioner, and the Chief Police Officer for the ACT for the provision of policing services to the Australian Capital Territory 2017-2021 The relationship between the AFP and the ACT Government for the provision of policing services to the ACT is long standing and contributes to Canberra being one of the safest places to live in Australia. The AFP, through ACT Policing, will provide a professional, innovative and effective policing service to the people of the ACT, contributing to a safe and just community for all. To achieve this vision, the ACT Government and ACT Policing are committed to: • Whole of government collaboration • Community engagement • Working in partnership • Transparency and information sharing • Innovation ACT Policing reflects the values of the AFP when delivering policing services to the ACT: • Integrity • Commitment • Excellence • Accountability • Fairness • Trust • Respect 1. Definitions 1.1 Unless stated otherwise, definitions in this Agreement are the same as in the Arrangement commenced in June 2017, between the Minister for Justice of the Commonwealth and the ACT Police Minister for the provision of policing services to the ACT. 2. Purpose and Objectives 2.1 In accordance with clause 2.1 of the Arrangement, this Agreement details the policing services to be purchased by the ACT Government from the AFP, including ACT Government Ministerial support, reporting, performance expectations and financial arrangements. 2.2 This Agreement will be read in conjunction with the Arrangement and Ministerial Directions issued under section 7 of the Arrangement. 2.3 The ACT Government and the AFP seek from this Agreement: appropriate policing levels and services for the ACT community; sustained high quality of service provision; and provision of stable and effective policing services for the ACT community as well as the building and retention of corporate knowledge within ACT Policing.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Lives Interupted by Covid—19
    Postal Address P.O. Box 546, Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 RETIRED POLICE ASSOCIATION OF TASMANIA i n c Newsleer Issue: April 2020 Email: [email protected] Patron: Sir Max Bingham QC, BCL, LLB, LL Secretary Kerrie Whitwam President David Plumpton Treasurer Steve Collidge OUR LIVES INTERUPTED BY COVID—19 Today we find ourselves in a world and in circumstances Recently, the RPAT circulated advice concerning the that none of us would have envisaged three months services it provides under normal circumstances to properly ago. Even with the hindsight of the last three months, it is recognise and respect the passing of a member. In some difficult to picture where we may be in a further three circumstances these usual services are not going to be able months. On a daily basis, we are receiving almost 12 hourly to be provided. information updates which identify the progress of the virus Subject to a request from the family, the RPAT provides an and the measures being taken by our Governments to opportunity for a former colleague, or close personal friend, address it. to read the ‘Ode to a Police Officer’ at any service. In the Most of us would never have imagined possible the remedial absence of such person nominating, a RPAT Executive strategies that are now in place concerning international member usually reads the Ode. Given the previously and inter-state travel and the requirements for social isolation. mentioned sanctions, this will not be possible in the The progress of these strategies has been followed by the foreseeable future and, as an alternative, the RPAT will RPAT Executive Committee, particularly given that the provide a copy of the Ode to the family to incorporate into the service as they would like.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report Change in perceptions, experiences and practices that support gender equality and cultural change in SAPOL March 2020 Independent Review into Sex Discrimination, Sexual Harassment and Predatory Behaviour in the South Australia Police Contents Message from the Commissioner for Equal Opportunity ............................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Supporting your Well-being .......................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 21 1.1 The 2016 EOC Independent Review ............................................................................................ 21 1.2 About the EOC Monitoring Project ................................................................................................ 23 1.3 Focus for Report 4 ........................................................................................................................ 25 1.4 Methodology and structure ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Law Enforcement
    Australian Law Enforcement In Australia, no one is above the law and all are subject to the law. This is called the rule of law. For the rule of law to be effective, it requires the law of the land to be known and followed by all citizens. An important component of maintaining Australia’s justice system is law enforcement, which ensures that everyone follows the law. Federal, state, and territory law enforcement services protect the community by preserving the peace, upholding the law, develop and run programs in crime prevention, aid in emergencies, and manage emergency incidents. Law enforcement agencies are subject and accountable to the law and have a responsibility to enforce legislation, which is passed through the different levels of governance in Australian society. Their origins began with the arrival of convicts on the First Fleet from England, back in 1788. And whilst the new settlement began as a penal colony, the evolution of the colony into a free society began developing as early as two weeks, when legal processes were put into effect to resolve any disputes and grievances that had arisen amongst the new inhabitants, including convicts. Australia's First Cops Were All Criminals Today, there are three main levels of law enforcement available in Australia which serves to protect citizens. They are: Federal State/Territory Local In addition to these levels, there are several other agencies that have powers to enforce Australian law in specific areas. Some examples include: o Australian Border Force - customs and immigration o Australian Defence Force – military police o Australian Securities and Intelligence Organisation – national security Each level has its own requirements and expectations, which all citizens in society are expected to know and follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Priorities
    Business and Executive Services DEPARTMENT OF POLICE, FIRE AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT BUSINESS PRIORITIES 2020 – 2021 Foreword Business and Executive Services (BES) is We have also resolved industrial issues, the corporate services arm of the improved Fire Boundary Mapping, Department of Police, Fire and Emergency implemented significant legislative change, Management and is responsible for the delivered Project Unify, and supported the provision of high quality and effective development of the Risk Management corporate, human resource and policy Framework across the Department, among services to the operational arms of the many other achievements. Department. As always, BES will continue to review, 2019-20 has presented challenges to all assess and adapt business processes for agencies within DPFEM, with the response continuous improvement. We will continue to to COVID-19 taking precedence over the embrace external scrutiny to learn and grow. delivery of business priorities in 2020. The professional development of our staff However, BES has managed to achieve the will always be a fundamental part of our delivery of several Business Priorities which continuous improvement journey. We have will significantly improve the services had a significant number of staff act in higher delivered by all agencies. One of these was roles and participate in projects. This the delivery of statewide video conferencing continues to build capability, which is an technology, which enhanced our ability to important part of maintaining a professional respond to COVID-19, and will improve our workforce. emergency service response into the future. The 2020-21 BES Business Priorities Other priorities delivered include the identifies key business priorities to support upgrade of police houses at Bicheno, Lady frontline operational services, and the Barron and Whitemark and the acquisition of commitments of the Tasmanian residences at Swansea and Smithton.
    [Show full text]