DOCSLIB.ORG

NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY PICKERING LANDS Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY PICKERING LANDS Final Report NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY PICKERING LANDS Final Report SUBMITTED TO: TRANSPORT CANADA PREPARED BY: THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY MARCH 2010 Greater Toronto Airports Authority CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Study Background...................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Study Elements........................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Next Steps.................................................................................................................1-2 1.4 Airport Scope ...........................................................................................................1-3 1.5 Chapter Profile ........................................................................................................1-6 Chapter 2: Previous Work Related to the Need for an Airport in Pickering 2.1 Brief History of the Early Years of the Pickering Lands (1968–1988) .........2-2 2.2 Aviation in Southern Ontario—A Strategy for the Future (1989–1990) ......2-3 2.3 Pearson Airside Development Project Environmental Impact Statement (1991) .......................................................................................2-5 2.4 Interim Report of the Federal Environmental Assessment Panel (1992) ......................................................................................2-9 2.5 Pearson 1995 Master Plan ....................................................................................2-9 2.6 Southern Ontario Area Airports Study (1995).................................................2-10 2.6.1 Objectives ...............................................................................................2-11 2.6.2 Study Scope ...........................................................................................2-11 2.6.3 Airport Summaries ...............................................................................2-12 2.6.4 Lack of Adequate Runway Length in the Eastern GTA ..................2-18 2.6.5 Overall Demand/Capacity Conclusions ............................................2-19 2.6.6 Development of a Second Major Airport ..........................................2-19 2.7 Pearson 1999 Master Plan ..................................................................................2-24 2.8 Pickering Airport Draft Plan Report (2004).....................................................2-25 2.9 Pearson 2007 Master Plan ..................................................................................2-28 Needs Assessment Study—Pickering Lands Chapter 3: Regional Traffic Forecasts 3.1 Passengers...............................................................................................................3-2 3.1.1 Revenue Origin-Destination Passengers ...........................................3-2 3.1.2 Revenue Enplaned/Deplaned Passengers .........................................3-4 3.1.3 Total Enplaned/Deplaned Passengers ...............................................3-6 3.1.4 High Speed Rail .......................................................................................3-7 3.1.5 New Forecasts ........................................................................................3-8 3.2 Air Carrier Movements ........................................................................................3-11 3.2.1 New Forecasts ......................................................................................3-12 3.3 General Aviation Aircraft Movements ..............................................................3-14 3.3.1 General Aviation Itinerant Movements .............................................3-14 3.3.2 General Aviation Local Movements ...................................................3-14 3.3.3 New Forecasts ......................................................................................3-17 3.4 Expanded Airport System ...................................................................................3-18 3.4.1 General Aviation Itinerant Aircraft Movement Forecasts .............3-19 3.4.2 General Aviation Local Movement Forecasts ..................................3-20 Chapter 4: Pearson Capacity 4.1 Activity History.........................................................................................................4-2 4.2 Airside Capacity.......................................................................................................4-3 4.2.1 Capacity of the Existing Airside System .............................................4-3 4.2.2 Potential Airside Capacity .....................................................................4-7 4.2.3 Airside Passenger Capacity ................................................................4-10 4.3 Passenger Terminal Capacity ............................................................................4-11 4.4 Opportunities to Maximize Airside Capacity ...................................................4-14 4.4.1 Daily Traffic Peak Spreading ..............................................................4-14 4.4.2 Weekly/Seasonal Traffic Patterns .....................................................4-15 4.4.3 Increased Night Time Operations ......................................................4-15 4.4.4 Off-loading Business Aviation Traffic ...............................................4-16 4.4.5 Larger Aircraft ......................................................................................4-16 4.4.6 Air Navigation Services ........................................................................4-17 4.4.7 Conclusion .............................................................................................4-19 Contents, Page 2 of 8 Contents Chapter 5: Airport Capacities 5.1 John C. Munro Hamilton International Airport.................................................5-1 5.1.1 Runway Facilities ....................................................................................5-3 5.1.2 Activity History .........................................................................................5-4 5.1.3 Current Capacity .....................................................................................5-5 5.1.4 Planned Capacity ....................................................................................5-7 5.1.5 Potential Capacity ...................................................................................5-8 5.2 Region of Waterloo International Airport........................................................5-10 5.2.1 Runway Facilities ..................................................................................5-11 5.2.2 Activity History .......................................................................................5-12 5.2.3 Current Capacity ...................................................................................5-13 5.2.4 Planned Capacity ..................................................................................5-14 5.2.5 Potential Capacity .................................................................................5-14 5.3 Toronto City Centre Airport ................................................................................5-16 5.3.1 Runway Facilities ..................................................................................5-18 5.3.2 Activity History .......................................................................................5-18 5.3.3 Current Capacity ...................................................................................5-20 5.3.4 Planned Capacity ..................................................................................5-22 5.3.5 Potential Capacity .................................................................................5-22 5.4 Toronto Buttonville Municipal Airport..............................................................5-25 5.4.1 Runway Facilities ..................................................................................5-27 5.4.2 Activity History .......................................................................................5-27 5.4.3 Current Capacity ...................................................................................5-28 5.4.4 Planned Capacity ..................................................................................5-28 5.4.5 Potential Capacity .................................................................................5-29 5.5 Oshawa Municipal Airport ...................................................................................5-29 5.5.1 Runway Facilities ..................................................................................5-31 5.5.2 Activity History .......................................................................................5-31 5.5.3 Current Capacity ...................................................................................5-32 5.5.4 Planned Capacity ..................................................................................5-33 5.5.5 Potential Capacity .................................................................................5-33 5.6 Peterborough Municipal Airport........................................................................5-34 5.6.1 Runway Facilities ..................................................................................5-35 5.6.2 Activity History .......................................................................................5-36 5.6.3 Current Capacity ...................................................................................5-36 5.6.4 Planned Capacity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ontario Municipal Board Commission Des Affaires Municipales De L’Ontario
    Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l’Ontario ISSUE DATE: May 26, 2016 CASE NO(S).: PL140743 PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 17(36) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Appellant (jointly): Angus Glen Holdings Inc., Angus Glen North West Inc. & North Markham Landowners Group Appellant (jointly): Beechgrove Estates Inc., Minotar Holdings Inc., Cor- Lots Developments, Cherokee Holdings & Halvan 5.5 Investments Ltd. Appellant (jointly): Brentwood Estates Inc., Colebay Investments Inc., Highcove Investments Inc., Firewood Holdings Inc., Major McCowan Developments Ltd. & Summerlane Realty Corp. Appellant: And others (See Attachment 1) Subject: Proposed New Official Plan – Part 1 (December 2013) - for the City of Markham Municipality: City of Markham OMB Case No.: PL140743 OMB File No.: PL140743 OMB Case Name: Angus Glen Holdings Inc. v. Markham (City) Heard: April 29, 2016 in Markham, Ontario APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel City of Markham C. Barnett L. Bisset B. Ketcheson For others see Attachment 2 2 PL140743 MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY M. CARTER-WHITNEY ON APRIL 29, 2016 AND ORDER OF THE BOARD [1] This was the fourth prehearing conference (“PHC”) in relation to numerous appeals of the new Official Plan (“OP”) of the City of Markham (“City”). [2] Chris Barnett, counsel for the City, provided an update on the status of a number of matters in relation to these appeals. The City has been engaged in discussions with different groups of appellants, divided in relation to common thematic issues, in an attempt to narrow and resolve those issues. As a result, a number of issues have been resolved and some appeals have been resolved and withdrawn.
    [Show full text]
  • For Vfr Operations at Cykz
    Buttonville Flying Club 2833 16th Ave. Markham, ON L3R 0P8 Date: February 14, 2019 Subject: Mandatory Frequency Area at TORONTO Buttonville Municipal Airport (CYKZ) Procedures Executive Summary – FOR VFR OPERATIONS AT CYKZ With the control tower closure on January 3, 2019 and the change in the Buttonville control zone in 2018, changes to aircraft and pilot operating procedures have taken place. In an effort to ensure safety, in a complex environment, unique in Canada, the following document outlines the facts as expressed by Transport Canada and Nav Canada through a variety of sources. Some operating changes to be aware of for Buttonville are: 1. Mandatory Frequency Area with No Advisory service. 2. No ATIS anymore 3. No TAF anymore. 4. The METAR transitioned to an LWIS with no ceilings or visibility. 5. No Tower providing runway conditions anymore. 6. Control Zone ceiling at 2,000 feet, precluding overflight of field at circuit altitude plus 500 feet. 7. While flying VFR you must adhere to the figure below. 8. Mandatory Frequency is now 124.8. 9. For weather and other information London Radio at Buttonville is 123.15, Flight line 123.5 (Ground is no longer operative, ATIS has pre-recorded looping message) Separate procedures will be written for IFR Operations At an MF area without an advisory, such as Buttonville and Peterborough, VFR aircraft must* join as depicted below: Version 6.0 1 Background Aircraft converging at airports require proper procedures to mitigate conflicts. Resources used in this document are CARs 602.97 to 602.104, as well as AIM RAC 4.5.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Downsview Major Roads Environmental Study Report
    City of Toronto Downsview Major Roads Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Environmental Study Report Prepared by: AECOM 30 Leek Crescent, Floor 4 905 882 4401 tel Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4B 4N4 905 882 4399 fax www.aecom.com April, 2018 Project Number: 60306466 City of Toronto Downsview Area Major Roads Environmental Study Report Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name City of Toronto AECOM Canada Ltd. Rpt_2018-04-20_Damr_Final Esr_60306466 City of Toronto Downsview Area Major Roads Environmental Study Report Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“AECOM”) for the benefit of the Client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between AECOM and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”): . is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the “Limitations”); . represents AECOM’s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; . may be based on information provided to AECOM which has not been independently verified; . has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; . must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; . was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and . in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time.
    [Show full text]
  • August 15, 2005
    PH19.1.18 Project No. 18355 December 8, 2020 Planning and Housing Committee 100 Queen Street West Toronto, ON M5H 2N2 Attention: Nancy Martins Dear Members of the Planning and Housing Committee, Re: Item PH19.1 Keele Finch Plus Planning Study – Final Report Proposed Secondary Plan and Protected MTSAs 470 Sentinel Road and 1, 35, and 40 Fountainhead Road We are the planning consultants for Ranee Management, the owners of the above- noted lands, located at the northwest corner of Finch Avenue West and Sentinel Road within the Keele Finch Plus Study Area. Please see our detailed letter to Matt Armstrong attached (Attachment 1) regarding our comments on the proposed Secondary Plan and Protected MTSAs. We are also requesting that we be notified of any action by the Planning and Housing Committee or Council, including the notice of adoption of any Official Plan Amendment. If you have any questions or would like to discuss these matters further, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Daniel Rende of our office. Yours truly, Bousfields Inc. Peter F. Smith, MCIP, RPP Attachment 1: Letter to Matt Armstrong dated December 8, 2020 3 Church St., #200, Toronto, ON M5E 1M2 T 416 -947-9744 F 416 -947-0781 www.bousfields.ca Project No. 18355 December 8, 2020 Mr. Matt Armstrong Planner Community Planning, North York District North York Civic Centre 5100 Yonge Street North York, ON M2N 5V7 Dear Mr. Armstrong: Re: Keele Finch Plus Planning Study – Final Report Proposed Secondary Plan and Protected MTSAs 470 Sentinel Road and 1, 35, and 40 Fountainhead Road We are the planning consultants for Ranee Management, the owners of the above- noted lands, located at the northwest corner of Finch Avenue West and Sentinel Road within the Keele Finch Plus Study Area (the “subject lands”).
    [Show full text]
  • Keele Street Avenue Study
    KEELE STREET AVENUE STUDY (Sean_Marshall, 2008) by Daniel Hahn Bachelor of Arts, University of Toronto, 2014 A major research project presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfllment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Planning in Urban Development. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2019 © Daniel Hahn 2019 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A MRP I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this MRP. This is a true copy of the MRP, including any required final revisions. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this paper to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP may be made electronically available to the public. DEDICATION Supported by: my loving and supportive parents and siblings. To: Professor Keeble, a friend and mentor. For: myself. There are three things extremely hard: steel, a diamond, and to know one’s self. II INTRODUCTION/ABSTRACT From its humble origins as a rural country road to its present form as a suburban arterial, the Keele Street Corridor - stretching from Wilson Avenue to Grandravine Drive - has long served the transportation and day-to-day needs of North York and Toronto residents. The following study presents the corridor as it was, as it is, and as it could be. Through a series of recommendations, this report intends to offer a vision of the corridor as an urbanized, livable, and beautiful corridor in keeping with the Official Plan’s Avenues policies and based on the following principles: Locating new and denser housing types that encourage a mix of use, make efficient use of lands, frame the right-of-way, are appropriately massed and attractively designed.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Transportation
    Tuesday, September 10 & Wednesday, September 11 9:00 am – 12:00 pm WalkShops are fully included with registration, with no additional charges. Due to popular demand, we ask that attendees only sign-up for one cycling tour throughout the duration of the conference. Active Transportation Building Out a Downtown Bike Network Gain firsthand knowledge of Toronto's on-street cycling infrastructure while learning directly from people that helped implement it. Ride through downtown's unique neighborhoods with staff from the City's Cycling Infrastructure and Programs Unit as they lead a discussion of the challenges and opportunities the city faced when designing and building new biking infrastructure. The tour will take participants to multiple destinations downtown, including the Richmond and Adelaide Street cycle tracks, which have become the highest volume cycling facilities in Toronto since being originally installed as a pilot project in 2014. Lead: City of Toronto Transportation Services Mode: Cycling Accessibility: Moderate cycling, uneven surfaces This WalkShop is sponsored by WSP. If You Build (Parking) They Will Come: Bicycle Parking in Toronto Providing safe, accessible, and convenient bicycle parking is an essential part of any city's effort to support increased bicycle use. This tour will use Toronto's downtown core as a setting to explore best practices in bicycle parking design and management, while visiting several major destinations and cycling hotspots in the area. Starting at City Hall, we will visit secure indoor bicycle parking, on-street bike corrals, Union Station's off-street bike racks, the Bike Share Toronto system, and also provide a history of Toronto's iconic post and ring bike racks.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Downsview Growth Districts + Bombardier Lands
    5 Downsview Growth Districts + Former Bombardier Lands The Canada Lands Company and City of Toronto are The Keeley planning for 42 thousand new jobs and residents within these five new districts surrounding Downsview Park. On top of that is the redevelopment potential for the Downsview Airport seen here in Yellow (the former Bombardier Lands). The Future Of The Downsview Area The current approved plan has 42,000 new jobs and residents as part of the 5 new districts These will consist of mid-rise buildings, green and public space This is with the airport height restriction This is without the development of the Bombardier Lands Create T.O. is one of the main land owners. They’re part of the City of Toronto and their mandate is to get highest and best value out of land sales for the benefit of the City Canada Lands Company is a property manager, stewarding the development of the lands to fund the further development of the park Land sales proceeds go to the City of Toronto and to the further development of the park Downsview Lands Site Plan The Keeley The 9 Acre Pond – “The Lake” The Stanley Greene District The Keeley This is where Mattamy’s Condos, Apartments and TH Developments are The Keeley is uniquely located across “The Lake” and will forever have unobstructed views to the east over the park, and to the west over a large ravine system. TAS is also dedicating a park to the south of The Keeley. The north is a low- rise neighbourhood. The Keeley’s location has the benefit of having a minimum of 42,000 new jobs and residences within walking distance, which will put upward pressure on real estate values in the area, without being in the middle of a construction zone which will happen on the outer boundaries of the park.
    [Show full text]
  • Glastar Gary Wolf
    July - August 2007 Recreational Aircraft Association Canada www.raa.ca The Voice of Canadian Amateur Aircraft Builders $6.95 Jim Dadson's Glastar Gary Wolf RAA AGM and Chapter 85 FLY-IN because someone leaked confiden- no wiggle room here. Three Eastern and two BC RAA tial information to the press. RAA directors made their way to Chapter Canada lobbied for access to this Light Sport - Success 85’s fly-in, where the chapter hosted vital information, and asked that it A lot of Canadians came back the 2007 RAA AGM. The members be made available to all pilots. The from Oshkosh impressed with the were friendly, the events were well CADORS are once again available number and quality of Light Sport organized and well attended, and online, and this time even to the aircraft on offer. Cessna’s new we all enjoyed the weekend. The general public. Privately owned plane was released, and sold nearly business meeting took place in the aircraft have their idents removed 600 during the week. This number Chapter 85 clubhouse at Delta Air- from the reports, and there is a dis- is now 700 and climbing. The sales park, and the Western members claimer that all reports are prelimi- success will mean a revolution in had direct input into the operations nary and unconfirmed. You may flight training in the US. Further, of RAA Canada. We sent out a call choose the national report, or if you LAMA (Light Aircraft Manufac- for a webmaster, and it looks as if wish to collect stats, you may do a turers’ Association) is doing what someone from BC might be taking search using a keyword for various I have been requesting of our over this position.
    [Show full text]
  • 923466Magazine1final
    www.globalvillagefestival.ca Global Village Festival 2015 Publisher: Silk Road Publishing Founder: Steve Moghadam General Manager: Elly Achack Production Manager: Bahareh Nouri Team: Mike Mahmoudian, Sheri Chahidi, Parviz Achak, Eva Okati, Alexander Fairlie Jennifer Berry, Tony Berry Phone: 416-500-0007 Email: offi[email protected] Web: www.GlobalVillageFestival.ca Front Cover Photo Credit: © Kone | Dreamstime.com - Toronto Skyline At Night Photo Contents 08 Greater Toronto Area 49 Recreation in Toronto 78 Toronto sports 11 History of Toronto 51 Transportation in Toronto 88 List of sports teams in Toronto 16 Municipal government of Toronto 56 Public transportation in Toronto 90 List of museums in Toronto 19 Geography of Toronto 58 Economy of Toronto 92 Hotels in Toronto 22 History of neighbourhoods in Toronto 61 Toronto Purchase 94 List of neighbourhoods in Toronto 26 Demographics of Toronto 62 Public services in Toronto 97 List of Toronto parks 31 Architecture of Toronto 63 Lake Ontario 99 List of shopping malls in Toronto 36 Culture in Toronto 67 York, Upper Canada 42 Tourism in Toronto 71 Sister cities of Toronto 45 Education in Toronto 73 Annual events in Toronto 48 Health in Toronto 74 Media in Toronto 3 www.globalvillagefestival.ca The Hon. Yonah Martin SENATE SÉNAT L’hon Yonah Martin CANADA August 2015 The Senate of Canada Le Sénat du Canada Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A4 K1A 0A4 August 8, 2015 Greetings from the Honourable Yonah Martin Greetings from Senator Victor Oh On behalf of the Senate of Canada, sincere greetings to all of the organizers and participants of the I am pleased to extend my warmest greetings to everyone attending the 2015 North York 2015 North York Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Ontario's Airports
    Airport Management Council of Ontario FEBRUARY 2015 V o l u m e 4, I s s u e 1 The Airport Environment and You Representing Ontario’s Airports Cochrane - Wonderfully Unexpected Porter Sells Toronto Billy Bishop Island Airport Terminal to Investment Group Air Canada Expanding Global Reach Snowy Owl Epidemic Sweeps Across Ontario Meet the Board Members Safety Board Launches Investigation of Small Air Carriers Northern Disaster Response Exercise Register today at www.amco.on.ca Airport Management Council of Ontario FEBRUARY 2015 V o l u m e 4, I s s u e 1 The Airport Environment and You INSIDE Wiarton Airport Short on Support ....................................3 Porter Sells Toronto Billy Situated on the edge of the Northern Ontario Wilderness, the Town of Cochrane Bishop Island Airport Terminal has both the amenities of the 21st century life and yet when you step out, you can to Investment Group ....................4 leave all that behind and explore hundreds of kilometers of snowmobile trails, lakes and rugged wilderness just waiting to be enjoyed as part of a less frantic lifestyle. Canada: Air Canada Cochrane is one of the fastest growing municipalities in Northern Ontario. With Expanding Global Reach ..............5 projections of growth as high as 50% over the next five years, business opportunities are plentiful and Cochrane boasts of its fortune in having some very attractive assets Buttonville Airport to Continue not typical of rural Northern Ontario. Operations Into Late 2016 ...........5 Serving the residents of Cochrane and surrounding communities, the Cochrane Snowy Owl ‘Epidemic’ Sweeps Municipal Airport a vital hub linking passengers and freight to the James Bay Across Ontario ..............................6 Coastline.
    [Show full text]
  • Downsview to Host World-Class Film and Television Production Studio
    Downsview to Host World-Class Film and Television Production Studio PSP Investments signs MOU for a ground lease with Hackman Capital Partners Montreal, Canada | Los Angeles, California – June 30, 2021 – The Public Sector Pension Investment Board (“PSP Investments”), one of Canada’s largest pension investment managers, today announced that it has signed a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") with Hackman Capital Partners (“HCP”), a privately-held real estate investment, operating company and owner of The MBS Group, for a long-term ground lease at Downsview in northwest Toronto, Canada, where HCP (or an HCP joint venture) will build a leading film and television production studio facility. With surging demand for entertainment content and demonstrating its confidence in the industry as a source of growth and value, PSP Investments is committed to content creation and the film and television production sector. In 2019, it announced a joint venture (“JV”) with HCP, Square Mile Capital Management, USAA and Teacher Retirement System of Texas for an investment in Amazon Studios’ new HCP-developed campus in Culver City, California and The MBS Media Campus in Manhattan Beach, California. The JV also acquired a minority stake in Television City Studios in Los Angeles and invested in The MBS Group, the largest studio-based equipment and production vendor in North America and the United Kingdom that provides all the necessary studio resources and infrastructure for content production, including consultation services, studio design/development, training, tech incubation, management, and operational oversight. “PSP Investments is excited to enter into this partnership which reinforces our focus on content creation and opportunities that foster and drive innovation,” said Kristopher Wojtecki, Managing Director, Real Estate Investments, PSP Investments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soils of Brant County
    The Soils of Brant County Volume 1 Ministry of Agriculture ' Agriculture and Food Canada Research Direction Ontario Branch de la recherche THE SOILS OF BRANT COUNTY Volume 1 REPORT NO. 55 OF THE ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF PEDOLOGY by C.J. Acton Land Resource Research Centre Research Branch Agriculture Canada Guelph, Ontario 1989 Land Resource Research Centre Contribution No. 89-18 . TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 5 Heidelberg Soils (HIG) . 33 Kelvin Soils (KVN) . 33 INTRODUCTION . 6 Lincoln Soils (LIC) . 34 GENERALDESCRIPTION OFTHEAREA . 7 Maryhill Soils (MYL) . 34 Location and Extent . 7 Muriel Soils (MUI) . .34 Early History . 7 Oakland Soils (OKL) . .35 Present Agriculture . 7 Plainfield Soils (PFD) . .35 Geology and Physiography . 8 Scotland Soils (STD) . .35 Bedrock Geology . 8 Seneca Soils (SNA) . 36 Surficial Geology . 9 Smithville Soils (SHV) . 36 Physiography and Sediments and their Stayner Soils (STN) . 36 Relationship to Soils in the County . 12 Styx Soils (SYX) . 37 Relief and Drainage . 16 Teeswater Soils (TEW) . 37 Climate . .17 Toledo Soils (TLD) . 37 Tuscola Soils (TUC) . 38 HOW THE SOILS WEREMAPPED AND Vanessa Soils (VSS) . 38 CLASSIFIED . .19 Walsingham Soils (WAM) . 38 Soil Mapping . .19 Waterin Soils (WRN) . 38 Survey Intensity and Map Reliability . 19 Waterloo Soils (WTO) . 39 Soil Classification . 19 Wauseon Soils (WUS) . 39 Soil Orders . .20 Wilsonville Soils (WIL) . 39 Soil Great Groups and Subgroups . .22 Woolwich Soils (WOW) . .40 Soil Families . .22 Soil Series . .22 MISCELLANEOUS LAND UNITS . .40 Soil Phases . .23 Alluvium (ALU) . 40 Miscellaneous Land Units . .23 Escarpment (ESC) . .40 Soil MapUnits . .23 Marsh (MAR) . 40 Urban Land (ULD) . .40 GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS OF THESOILS .
    [Show full text]