The Soils of Brant County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Soils of Brant County The Soils of Brant County Volume 1 Ministry of Agriculture ' Agriculture and Food Canada Research Direction Ontario Branch de la recherche THE SOILS OF BRANT COUNTY Volume 1 REPORT NO. 55 OF THE ONTARIO INSTITUTE OF PEDOLOGY by C.J. Acton Land Resource Research Centre Research Branch Agriculture Canada Guelph, Ontario 1989 Land Resource Research Centre Contribution No. 89-18 . TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 5 Heidelberg Soils (HIG) . 33 Kelvin Soils (KVN) . 33 INTRODUCTION . 6 Lincoln Soils (LIC) . 34 GENERALDESCRIPTION OFTHEAREA . 7 Maryhill Soils (MYL) . 34 Location and Extent . 7 Muriel Soils (MUI) . .34 Early History . 7 Oakland Soils (OKL) . .35 Present Agriculture . 7 Plainfield Soils (PFD) . .35 Geology and Physiography . 8 Scotland Soils (STD) . .35 Bedrock Geology . 8 Seneca Soils (SNA) . 36 Surficial Geology . 9 Smithville Soils (SHV) . 36 Physiography and Sediments and their Stayner Soils (STN) . 36 Relationship to Soils in the County . 12 Styx Soils (SYX) . 37 Relief and Drainage . 16 Teeswater Soils (TEW) . 37 Climate . .17 Toledo Soils (TLD) . 37 Tuscola Soils (TUC) . 38 HOW THE SOILS WEREMAPPED AND Vanessa Soils (VSS) . 38 CLASSIFIED . .19 Walsingham Soils (WAM) . 38 Soil Mapping . .19 Waterin Soils (WRN) . 38 Survey Intensity and Map Reliability . 19 Waterloo Soils (WTO) . 39 Soil Classification . 19 Wauseon Soils (WUS) . 39 Soil Orders . .20 Wilsonville Soils (WIL) . 39 Soil Great Groups and Subgroups . .22 Woolwich Soils (WOW) . .40 Soil Families . .22 Soil Series . .22 MISCELLANEOUS LAND UNITS . .40 Soil Phases . .23 Alluvium (ALU) . 40 Miscellaneous Land Units . .23 Escarpment (ESC) . .40 Soil MapUnits . .23 Marsh (MAR) . 40 Urban Land (ULD) . .40 GENERAL DESCRIPTIONS OF THESOILS . .24 Soil Key . .24 SOIL INTERPRETATIONS FOR AGRICULTURE . .44 Soil Descriptions . .26 A. Agricultural Capability Classification for Alluvial Soils (ALU) . .26 Common Field Crops . .44 Ayr Soils (AYR) . .26 Assumptions . .44 Berrien Soils (BRR) . .26 Capability Classification for Mineral Soils . .44 Beverly Soils (BVY) . .27 Soil Capability Classes . .44 Bookton Soils (BOO) . .27 Soil Capability Subclasses . .45 Brady Soils (BAY) . .27 Capability Classification for Organic Soils . .45 BrantSoils (BRT) . .28 Organic Soil Capability Classes . .45 Brantford Soils (BFO) . .28 Procedure for Using Tables for Soil Capability Burford Soils (BUF) . .29 Classes with Brant County Soil Maps . .47 Caledon Soils (CAD) . .29 B. Agricultural Suitability Ratings for Special Crops . .47 Camilla Soils (CML) . .29 Soil Suitability Classes . .47 Colwood Soils (CWO) . .30 Assumptions . .47 Conestogo Soils (CTG) . .30 How to Determine Special Crop Suitability Dumfries Soils (DUF) . .30 Ratings . .48 Fox Soils (FOX) . .31 C. Soil Erosion Interpretations . .53 Gilford Soils (GFD) . 31 Soil Interpretations for Water Erosion . 53 Gobles Soils (GOB) . 31 Rainfall Erosivity (R) . .53 Granby Soils (GNY) . .32 Soil Map Unit Erosion Potential . .54 Guelph Soils (GUP) . .32 Site-specific Assessment of Soil Erosion Haldimand Soils (HIM) . .32 Potential . .54 Harrisburg Soils (HBG) . .33 REFERENCES . .61 LIST OF TABLES 1. Farmland use in Brant County . 9 8. Agricultural capability classification for common field crops for soils of Brant County . .46 2. Area and value of main crops grown in Brant County . 9 9. Organization ofspecial crops into crop groups and 3. Pleistocene stratigraphy and associated soils of Brant crop subgroups for the Brant County region . .47 County . .11 10. Agricultural suitability ratings for special crops in 4. Properties ofprincipal tills occurring 'in BrantCounty . .48 BrantCounty . .13 11. K-values, erodibility classes and erosion potential for 5. Climatic data for Brantford and neighbouring Brant County soils . 55 locations . .18 12. Guidelines for establishing soil erodibility classes . 59 6. Soil families of Brant County . .21 13. Guidelines for assessing soil erosion potential classes . .59 7. Mean horizon values of Brant Countysoils . .41 14. LS-values for different combinations of slope length and slopegradient . .59 LIST OF FIGURES 1. General location of Brant and surrounding counties . 7 8. Schematic landscape cross-section showing soil parent materials associated with the Grand River 2. Urbancentres, roads and railway networks and and the Paris moraine near Paris . 15 townships in BrantCounty . 8 9. Schematic landscape cross-section showing the 3. Paleozoic geology of Brant County . 10 relationship of surficial sands to underlying deposits 4. Surficial geology of Brant County . 12 onthe sand plain near Cathcart . 15 5. Schematic landscape cross-section showing soil 10. Main streams and tributaries in Brant County . 16 parent materials associated with the Tillsonburg 11. Climatic regions in Brant County . 17 moraine near Harley . 13 12. Diagrammatic soil profile of a well-drained Brunisolic 6. Schematic landscape cross-section showing soil GrayBrown Luvisol . .20 parent materials associated with the Galt moraine near Scotland . .14 13. Diagrammatic soil profile of a poorly drained Orthic Humic Gleysol . .20 7. Schematic landscape cross-section between Paris and Ohsweken showing soil parent materials associated 14. Prediction ofcropland erosion potential and some with the Galt moraine and adjacent glaciofluvial control alternatives . 60 and glaciolacustrine sediments . 14 15. Index of soil maps for Brant County . 62 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The soil survey, data collection, analysis and preparation Valuable input was provided by S. Rowe and J. Bodner, ofthe soil maps and report for Brant County involved the con- Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food Horticultural Crop tributions of many individuals. Those making a major contri Specialists for Brant County in interpreting the soils for spe- bution to field mapping were S. Humphrey, D. Cressman, cialty cropuses. B. Maclean, W. Hodgins, B. Cameron, G. Roberts and S. Kendall aided by many other student assistants. Field sam- Colleagues atthe Agriculture Canada, Guelph Soil Survey pling and laboratory analyses were carried by R. Unit were very helpful in various aspects of the report prepara- out Viitala, tion. B. Hohner and C. Miller ofAgriculture Canada. Dr. O.L. White E.W. Presant assisted in a substantial way with the soil of the Ontario Geological Survey, Ontario Ministry of Natural interpretations section and in report editing. The section on Resources, assisted with soil sampling for engineering proper-.
Recommended publications
  • 2007 OMBI Public Report
    Musk of Toronto • Regi urham • 2007Regional Performa ce Benchmarking Municipality Report TABLE OF CONTENTS tawa • Regional Municipality of Peel • City of Windsor • RegionalLETTER FROM THE Municipality CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS of York AND CITY • MANAGERS County .. .......... of Brant 1 INTRODUCTION .. ............................................................. 3 City of London •THE District OMBI BENCHMARKING of Muskoka PROCESS............................................. • Regional Municipal 5 • City of Thunder2007 COMPARATIVE Bay RESULTS • City of Toronto • Regional Munici • Regional Municipality WHO DOES of WHAT?............................................. Durham • Regional Municipalit. 10 HOW TO READ THE GRAPHS .. ................................... 11 ality of Niagara • City1 Building of ServicesOttawa .. ............................................. • Regional Municipality. 12 o ality of Waterloo • 2City By-law ofEnforcement Windsor Services . .• . .Regional . .Municipality . 15 3 Child Care Services. 18 f Halton • City of Hamilton • City of London • District of M 4 Culture Services .. .............................................. 21 of Peel • City5 ofEmergency Greater Medical Services Sudbury . .• . .City . .of . .Thunder . 24 Bay • C 6 Fire Services .. ................................................. 28 cipality of York 7• CountyHostel Services .................................................of Brant • Regional Municipality. 32 8 Library Services .. .............................................. 35 t of Muskoka • Regional9
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton to Brantford Rail Trail
    Thanks to Our Donors Who Helped Build the Trails TheThe Hamilton-Brantford-CambridgeHamilton-Brantford-Cambridge LinkageLinkage ofof TrailsTrails The trails are provided free for public use, but the cost to acquire the land and build the four trails approached $1.5 million. The funds were provided P by generous donations from the following corporations, individuals and like-minded foundations. In 1993, the City of Brantford commenced its Gordon Glaves Memorial Pathway A major trail system now links the cities of Hamilton, Station Masters Honour Roll along the scenic Grand River. Brantford and Cambridge. These 80 kms of trail form a u SC Johnson and Son, Limited major component in the southern Ontario loop of the u Canadian General-Tower Trans Canada Trail System. u Trans Canada Trail Foundation When opened in 1994 by the Grand River Conservation Authority, u The Jean Rich Foundation the Cambridge to Paris Rail Trail was one of the first abandoned rail lines u Redland Quarries to be converted for recreational trail use in southern Ontario. u TCG Materials u Brant Waterways Foundation P u Province of Ontario In 1996, the Hamilton to Brantford Rail Trail was completed by the Hamilton P & Grand River Conservation Authorities and became Canada's first fully developed, Kilometer Club entirely off-road interurban trail. u Brantford Jaycees u CAA South Central Ontario ! u Canada Trust - Friends of the Environment Foundation In October of 1998 these three trails were joined by the SC Johnson Trail, u Ciba-Geigy through the generosity of SC Johnson and Son Limited of Brantford, to form a u Dofasco Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Court File No. CV-18-591908-00CL
    Court File No. CV-18-591908-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018 ER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE OR ARRANGEMENT OF DUNDEE OIL AND GAS LIMITED SURRENDERED LEASES ORDER TH IS MOTION, made by Dundee Oil and Gas Limited ("DOGL") on its behalf and as general partner on behalf of Dundee Energy Limited Partnership ("DELP") and together with DOGL, the "Debtors") for an order directing each applicable Land Registry Office and/or Land Titles Office to delete and discharge certain instruments from title to the applicable properties, as more particularly set out below, was heard this day at 361 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario. ON READING the seventh report (the "Seventh Report") of FTI Consulting Canada Inc., in its capacity as the Court-appointed monitor (the "Monitor") and on hearing the submissions of counsel for the Monitor and the Debtors, National Bank of Canada, Lagasco Inc. (the "Buyer"), Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, no one appearing for any other person on the service list, although properly served as appears from the affidavit of Rachel Bengino sworn on November 13, 2018, filed: -2 THIS COURT ORDERS that upon the registration in the Land Registry Office for the Land Titles Division of Norfolk (#37) of an Application to Amend Based on Court Order in the form prescribed by the Land Titles Act and/or the Land Registration Reform Act against title to the real property identified in Schedule "A" hereto, the Land Registrar is hereby directed to delete and discharge from title to the real property identified in Schedule "A" hereto all of the instruments registered in favour of the Debtors and/or National Bank of Canada listed in Schedule "A" hereto.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting What We Value
    Protecting What We Value Introduction and Context The County of Brant has initiated an update to its Official Plan. An Official Plan, is a document that outlines a municipality’s general land use planning policies in ways that plan for future growth. The process of preparing a new Official Plan requires a Municipal Comprehensive Review to ensure the Official Plan aligns with provincial land-use planning documents. The County of Brant Official Plan must follow the Growth Plan for the Greater Golder Horseshoe, 2019, reflect policy direction from the Provincial Policy Statement, 2020, and incorporate the County’s strategic initiatives, all to create an Official Plan that best suits the County of Brant. To plan for the future, the County will seek guidance from the Province of Ontario and input from the community and key stakeholders, to help create updated policy directions that will help guide our new Official Plan. One of the ways to begin discussions and receive valuable feedback is through the presentation of themed discussion papers. These papers are intended to provide background information on specific topics to help the discussion of important issues and objectives for growth management and land use. Community support is essential to creating and implementing an Official Plan that best reflects a community’s goals. Contents Water Resources Systems ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Natural Heritage Systems..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Grand River Source Protection Plan - Public Consultation Details March 25, 2015
    Grand River Source Protection Plan - Public Consultation Details March 25, 2015 Grand River SPP - Public Meeting Dates Grand River Source Protection Plan - March 16, 2015 to April 24, 2015 Meeting Date Location Water Systems Meeting Chair Venue Staff March 31, 2015 Amaranth Grey County, Dufferin County Wendy Wright Amaranth Recreation LER: Martin Keller, Ellen 7:00pm Cascaden Hall Fanning 374028 6th Line, Amaranth March 31, 2015 Fergus Wellington County Dale Murray Fergus SportsPlex LER: Dave Schultz, Kaitlyn 7:00pm Banquet Hall Smith 550 Belsyde Avenue E, Wellington: Kyle Davis Fergus April 8, 2015 Brantford City of Brantford, City of Craig Ashbaugh T.B. Costain LER: Dave Schultz, Ellen 7:00pm Hamilton Community Centre Fanning Community Room 2 Brantford: Patrick Halevy, 16 Morrell Street - Michael Mullen Brantford Hamilton: Andrea Bazzard April 9, 2015 Guelph City of Guelph, Wellington Wendy Wright Guelph City Hall LER: Martin Keller, Ellen 7:00pm County, Region of Halton Cascaden 1 Carden Street, Fanning Guelph Guelph: Peter Rider, Dave Rm 112 Belanger, April Nix Wellington: Kyle Davis April 9, 2015 Waterloo Region of Waterloo, Perth David Parker WRESTRC* LER: Dave Schultz, Hajnal 7:00pm County Classrooms 1 & 2 Kovacs 1001 Erb’s Road Waterloo: Eric Hodgins, Waterloo Amy Domaratzki, Colleen Brown, Eric Thuss (to be confirmed) April 15, 2015 Cambridge Region of Waterloo Bill Strauss GRCA Auditorium LER: Dave Schultz, Ellen 7:00pm 400 Clyde Road, Fanning Cambridge Waterloo: Eric Hodgins, Amy Domaratzki, Colleen Brown, Eric Thuss (to be
    [Show full text]
  • OMERS Employer Listing (As at December 31, 2020)
    OMERS Employer Listing (As at December 31, 2020) The information provided in this chart is based on data provided to the OMERS Administration Corporation and is current until December 31, 2020. There are 986 employers on this listing with a total of 288,703 active members (30,067 NRA 60 active members and 258,636 NRA 65 active members). Are you looking for a previous employer to determine your eligibility for membership in the OMERS Primary Pension Plan? If you think your previous employer was an OMERS employer but you don’t see it on this list, contact OMERS Client Services at 416-369-2444 or 1-800-387-0813. Your previous employer could be related to or amalgamated with another OMERS employer and not listed separately here. Number of Active Members Employer Name NRA 60 NRA 65 Total 1627596 ONTARIO INC. * * 519 CHURCH STREET COMMUNITY CENTRE 48 48 AJAX MUNICIPAL HOUSING CORPORATION * * AJAX PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD 42 42 ALECTRA ENERGY SERVICES * * ALECTRA ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. * * ALECTRA INC. * * ALECTRA POWER SERVICES INC. * * ALECTRA UTILITIES CORPORATION 1,283 1,283 ALGOMA DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 522 522 ALGOMA DISTRICT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION BOARD 120 120 ALGOMA HEALTH UNIT 178 178 ALGOMA MANOR NURSING HOME 69 69 ALGONQUIN AND LAKESHORE CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 558 558 ALMISE CO-OPERATIVE HOMES INC. * * ALSTOM TRANSPORT CANADA 45 45 APPLEGROVE COMMUNITY COMPLEX * * ART GALLERY OF BURLINGTON * * ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL MANAGERS, CLERKS AND TREASURERS OF * * ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES OF ONTARIO 42 42 ATIKOKAN HYDRO INC * * AU CHATEAU HOME FOR THE AGED 214 214 AVON MAITLAND DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 745 745 AYLMER POLICE SERVICES BOARD * * * BELLEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD 29 29 * at least one of NRA 60 or NRA 65 number of active members is less than 25 The information is used for pension administration purposes, and may not be appropriate for other purposes, and is current to December 31, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY PICKERING LANDS Final Report
    NEEDS ASSESSMENT STUDY PICKERING LANDS Final Report SUBMITTED TO: TRANSPORT CANADA PREPARED BY: THE GREATER TORONTO AIRPORTS AUTHORITY MARCH 2010 Greater Toronto Airports Authority CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 Study Background...................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Study Elements........................................................................................................1-2 1.3 Next Steps.................................................................................................................1-2 1.4 Airport Scope ...........................................................................................................1-3 1.5 Chapter Profile ........................................................................................................1-6 Chapter 2: Previous Work Related to the Need for an Airport in Pickering 2.1 Brief History of the Early Years of the Pickering Lands (1968–1988) .........2-2 2.2 Aviation in Southern Ontario—A Strategy for the Future (1989–1990) ......2-3 2.3 Pearson Airside Development Project Environmental Impact Statement (1991) .......................................................................................2-5 2.4 Interim Report of the Federal Environmental Assessment Panel (1992) ......................................................................................2-9 2.5 Pearson 1995 Master Plan ....................................................................................2-9 2.6 Southern Ontario
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transportation Safety Investigation Report A18O0153
    Air Transportation Safety Investigation Report A18O0153 COLLISION WITH TERRAIN Piper PA-28R-200, C-GDUM Brantford Airport, Ontario 13 November 2018 History of the flight At approximately 00271 on 13 November 2018, the privately owned Piper PA-28R-200 aircraft (registration C-GDUM, serial number 28R7535272) departed from Burlington Executive Airport (CZBA), Ontario, with 2 people on board. The intended destination could not be determined, because neither a flight plan nor an itinerary were filed for the flight. Several minutes2 before departure, a succession of 5 keyed microphone clicks were recorded on the aerodrome traffic frequency at CZBA. This sequence of clicks is used by pilots to turn on the ARCAL (aircraft radio control of aerodrome lighting), which includes runway lighting. Although these clicks were recorded, no verbal transmissions normally associated with departing or arriving aircraft traffic were recorded. Shortly after departure, at 0028, the aircraft began to be recorded on radar climbing west of CZBA toward the Brantford Airport (CYFD), Ontario, located 28 nautical miles (nm) to the southwest.3 At 0043, when the aircraft was approximately 4 nm east of CYFD at 1600 feet,4 a series of clicks was 1 All times are Eastern Standard Time (Coordinated Universal Time minus 5 hours). 2 The exact time of the microphone clicks is uncertain, because the audio recording was compressed. 3 CYFD has a UNICOM radio frequency with limited hours of operation. It was not staffed at the time of the occurrence. 4 In this report, all altitudes are above sea level, unless otherwise noted. 2 | TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD OF CANADA recorded on the CYFD aerodrome traffic frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA 3.1 January 10, 2019, Airport Committee
    A G E N D A Athabasca Airport Committee Athabasca County Thursday, January 10, 2019 - 9:30 a.m. FCSS Meeting Room Athabasca Airport Committee Athabasca County Thursday, January 10, 2019 - 9:30 a.m. Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. SELECTION OF A CHAIRPERSON 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3.1 January 10, 2019, Airport Committee 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4.1 October 4, 2018, Airport Minutes 3 - 5 5. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES 5.1 6. FINANCIALS 6.1 December 31, 2018 6 7. NEW BUSINESS 7.1 Alberta Airports Managers Association Seminar 7 7.2 Athabasca Airport Strategic Plan Update 8 - 10 7.3 2019 Lease Fees Review 11 7.4 2018 - 2021 Tourism and Economic Development Committee 12 - 31 Strategic Plan 7.5 Fuel Sales and Movement 32 - 33 7.6 7.7 8. INFORMATION 8.1 Manager's Report 34 8.2 October 31, 2018, AAMA Newsletter 35 - 42 8.3 November 30, 2018, AAMA Newsletter 43 - 50 8.4 December 31, 2018, AAMA Newsletter 51 - 58 8.5 9. IN CAMERA ITEMS 9.1 10. NEXT MEETING 10.1 April 4, 2019 11. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 58 AGENDA ITEM # 4.1 Athabasca Airport Committee Meeting Athabasca County October 04, 2018 - 9:30 AM County Office - Chambers PRESENT: Chair Brent Murray; Members Christi Bilsky, Dwayne Rawson, Travais Johnson, Derrick Woytovicz; Health Safety & Facilities Coordinator Norm De Wet; and Recording Secretary Iryna Kennedy. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Murray called the meeting to order at 9:36 a.m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: October 4, 2018, Airport Committee Resolution Moved by Member Johnson that the agenda be adopted as AP 18-30 presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hub of Ontario Trails
    Conestoga College (Pulled from below Doon) Cambridge has 3 trails Brantford has 2 Trails Homer Watson Blvd. Doon Three distinct trail destinations begin at Brant’s Crossing Kitchener/Waterloo 47.0 kms Hamilton, Kitchener/ Waterloo Port Dover completes the approximate and Port Dover regions are route on which General Isaac Brock travelled Blair Moyer’s Landing Blair Rd. Access Point Riverside Park now linked to Brantford by during the War of 1812. COUNTY OF OXFORD Speed River 10’ x 15” space To include: No matter your choice of direction, you’ll BRANT’S CROSSING WATERLOO COUNTY a major trail system. WATERLOO COUNTY City of Hamilton logo Together these 138.7 kms of enjoy days of exploration between these Dumfries COUNTY OF BRANT Riverblus Park Conservation Access Point G Area e the Trans Canada Trail provide a variety of three regions and all of the delightful o Tourism - web site or QR code r g e S WATERLOOWATERLOO COUNTYCOUNTY t . towns and hamlets along the way. 401 scenic experiences for outdoor enthusiasts. THETHE HUBHUB OFOF ONTARIOONTARIO TRAILSTRAILS N . Cambridge COUNTY OF WELLINGTON 6 Include how many km of internal trails The newest, southern link, Brantford to 39.8 kms N Any alternate routes Pinehurst Lake Glen Morris Rd. COUNTY OF OXFORD W i t Conservation COUNTY OF BRANT h P Concession St. h Area Cambridge Discover Kitchener / Waterloo Stayovers / accommodations i R Access Point e Churchill i Park Three exciting trail excursions begin in Brantford m v Whether you're biking, jogging or walking, of the city is the Walter Bean Grand River e r Myers Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Cemetery Tour Brochure
    i Q Q County of Brant HERITAGE CEMETERY Driving Tour Q Q i War of 1812 Veterans interred in County of Brant Cemeteries All Saints Cemetery Glen Morris Cemetery Mount Pleasant Thomas R. Cumming Thomas Atkinson Frederick Yeoward Holy Trinity Cemetery John R. Bradt Baptist Cemetery / William Brown St. Abner Cemetery Charles S. Perley Nathaniel Landon Jacob Smith Baptist Church Cemetery Johnson Cemetery John Fonger (Private Property) Benjamin File Brant Cemetery John W. Clark Lymburner Cemetery Henry A. Cornwell Robert Lymburner Malachi File William Lymburner John Oles Benjamin Strowbridge Mount Pleasant Cemetery Stephen Burtch Burford Congregational Joseph Chatterson Cemetery John Cook Thomas Fowler Allin Ellis Henry Lester Henery Ellis John Ward John Ellis Jacob Yeigh Robert P. McAlister Burford Pioneer Cemetery John W. McIntyre William D. Bowen Thomas Perrin Sr. Lewis Burwell Solomon Phelps Jonathan Stephens Daniel Secord Sr. John McKenzie Sturgis Clump Cemetery William Sturgis Ebenezer Willson William Thompson Morris Thomas Fairfield Plains United Cemetery John Clements Daniel A. Freeland i War of 1812 Grave Markers isitors may notice that in some of the cemeteries in the County Vof Brant, there are black granite markers mounted in white metal stands dotted throughout the cemetery. These markers were placed at the graves of veterans who fought in the War of 1812 between the United States, Great Britain and their Indigenous allies. The granite markers were supplied through a program called “The War of 1812 Graveside Project” to mark the 200th anniversary of the war. 86 veterans from the War of 1812 are interred in County of Brant cemeteries. They were recognized with a plaque, placed during a ceremony, in which their graves were blessed and reenactors fired muskets in a three volley salute.
    [Show full text]
  • Brant, Haldimand and Norfolk Counties September 2005
    Mapping Literacy in the Community Brant, Haldimand and Norfolk Counties September 2005 Mapping Literacy inLiteracy the Community Link South - CentralLiteracy Link South Central Acknowledgements The Mapping Literacy in the Community Team would like to acknowledge the literacy service providers and community organizations in Brant, Haldimand and Norfolk for all of their feedback during this project. Their input helped the team to ensure the accuracy of the data and assisted in the analysis aspects of this project. We are particularly thankful for the guidance and input that we received from the management and staff at Literacy Link South Central. Their input on a variety of topics helped to make this report a document that many people will find engaging and informative. The team recognizes and appreciates the significant contribution that Heather Cousins at Investing in Children, our project partner, made to this project. This project would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of Tracey Robins and Erin Alonzo and the Project Coordinator, Charlene Hofbauer. We are especially thankful for the funding support from the Government of Canada. It is our hope that this report will prove to be a useful tool for those who are planning and delivering literacy programs and for community organizations who are interested in the impact of literacy on their community. Permission to reprint this material, in whole or in part, must be obtained from Literacy Link South Central: Literacy Link South Central 213 Consortium Court London,
    [Show full text]