One of Us: the Story of a Massacre and Its Aftermath Free

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

One of Us: the Story of a Massacre and Its Aftermath Free FREE ONE OF US: THE STORY OF A MASSACRE AND ITS AFTERMATH PDF Asne Seierstad,Sarah Death | 544 pages | 03 May 2015 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9781844089208 | English | London, United Kingdom One of Us: The Story of Anders Breivik and the Massacre in Norway - Åsne Seierstad - Google книги It is a ghastly story of family dysfunction, professional and sexual failure, grotesque narcissism and the temptation of apocalyptic delusions. Breivik grew up in an expensive area in Oslo. But his home life must have been miserable from the start. His father, a diplomat, disappeared more or less completely from his life. And One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and its Aftermath mother was a depressive, self-destructive woman who thought of sending her boy and his sister to an orphanage. Attempts to join groups or make friends almost always ended in humiliation. He made up for his social failures by dreaming of personal grandeur. He did have one childhood friend, called Ahmed, the son of Pakistani immigrants. Norwegian kids laughed at these pretensions; Ahmed moved away. After finishing high school, Breivik tried various schemes to make One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and its Aftermath money, such as selling advertising space by telephone, and failed. He later succeeded for a while by peddling fake university diplomas on the internet, but this too ran into the sand when he was in danger of being exposed. At one point, joining the Freemasons seemed an attractive way to cut a figure in a secret society, but after being introduced to a lodge by a relative, Breivik got bored and never attended. His dreams of power became increasingly aggressive. He turned to guns, acquiring unusual expertise in weapons and military hardware. But Breivik was considered too weird even for the Progress party and he was never asked to run for office. His love life, too, failed to take off. But nothing came of this, either. Some who knew Breivik, who was always a fastidious dresser and liked to wear makeup, were convinced that he was secretly gay. He denied this fiercely and bragged that he was quite a brothel man. Now that power, money and glory, had eluded him in real life, Breivik found temporary solace in virtual reality. He called himself Andersnordic. Aroundhe decided to go it alone. From then on, he lived almost entirely in his imagination, but his fantasies were still linked to the real world of politics and ideology. Breivik became obsessed with the idea that the west was at war with Islam. To Breivik these were not just words: he had found a cause, a way to show his real power and get recognition at last from a cold and indifferent world. It was now time for some real action. He also managed to acquire an arsenal of lethal weapons. All this is described in chilling detail by Seierstad. Indeed, Breivik told his police interrogators that he was actually inspired by the One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and its Aftermath spirit of al-Qaida. What such killers crave more than anything else is maximum publicity, fame, attention. This is true if they are loners. And it is true when they act as the suicidal hitmen for revolutionary groups. Worldwide publicity transforms these misfits into heroic or villainous representatives of global religions, political ideologies and even entire civilisations. How far can we separate a Breivik from the ideas that inspired him? Muslims like to claim that jihadi terrorists have nothing to do with Islam. It is true that the Islamism promoted by Islamist revolutionaries is not what most Muslims believe in. But it is also true that elements of their faith are used to promote extreme violence. Islam cannot be blamed for this. But those who prod young people into committing murder by preaching hatred can be. If this is so, then what about the ideas that inspired Breivik? Breivik may or may not be a madman. The court psychiatrists in Oslo differed on this. In the end it was decided that he was not. But that ideas have consequences cannot be denied. This book throws a great deal of light on the life and times of a miserable killer. That he had a sick imagination is clear. More is to be said about the ideas that fed it. Facebook Twitter Pinterest. Topics Biography books. Reuse this content. Order by newest oldest recommendations. Show 25 25 50 All. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. Loading comments… Trouble loading? Most popular. One of Us: The Story of Anders Breivik and the Massacre in Norway by Åsne Seierstad A One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and its Aftermath and thorough account of the massacre that upended Norway, and the trial that helped put the country back together On July 22,Anders Behring Breivik detonated a bomb outside government buildings in central Oslo, killing eight people. What made Breivik, a gifted child from an affluent neighborhood in Oslo, become a terrorist? As in her bestseller The Bookseller of KabulSeierstad excels at the vivid portraiture of lives under stress. She delves deep into Breivik's troubled childhood, showing how a hip-hop and graffiti aficionado became a right-wing activist and Internet game addict, and then an entrepreneur, Freemason, and self-styled master warrior who sought to "save Norway" from the threat of Islam and multiculturalism. She writes with equal intimacy about Breivik's victims, tracing their political awakenings, aspirations to improve their country, and ill-fated journeys to the island. We have also gotten to know an entire country—famously peaceful and prosperous, and utterly incapable of protecting its youth. On July 22,Anders Breivik set off a bomb, outside of a government building, in Oslo killing eight people. A very difficult book to read, even harder to understand why Anders Breivik did what he did so violently yet so calmly. Asne Seierstad I think writes with some understanding and tries to get to the She lives in Oslo, Norway. One of Us (book) - Wikipedia Seierstad explains in the epilogue [1] : that Tina Brown commissioned her to get anything on "that man" for publication in Newsweek. Instead she wrote about the reaction in Norway [2] One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and its Aftermath left for Libya. When Breivik's trial was set to begin, Brown tried again. Seierstad returned to Norway and sat in the courtroom for all 10 weeks of the trial. In Seierstad's words [1] : she was "drip-fed the details of the planning and execution of the act of terrorism She read the police reports, the confidential psychiatric reports, the 22 July commission report, and Breivik's own writing. She interviewed families, friends, and politicians. In her author's note [1] : vii Seierstad reports that all facts told in the narrative come from these sources. One of Us is a book about belonging, a book about community There were no shortcuts. This is also a book about looking for a way to belong and not finding it. The perpetrator ultimately opted-out of the community and chose to strike at it in the most brutal of ways It is also a story about contemporary Norway. It is a story about us. One of Us was published in Norway in November by Kagge [1] : frontmatter pp. The English-language version of One of Us has been recognized by a number of institutions and publications. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Retrieved 22 January Angus Robertson. Fishpond Ltd. Retrieved 15 July The New York Times. Inga Bejer Engh Svein Holden. Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen Arne Lyng. Categories : Norway attacks non-fiction books Books adapted into films Norwegian books. Hidden categories: Articles needing additional references from July All articles One of Us: The Story of a Massacre and its Aftermath additional references Use dmy dates from October Articles containing Norwegian-language text. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Download as PDF Printable version. First edition Norwegian. Angel of Grozny: Inside Chechnya. Two Sisters Originally published in Norwegian by Kagge..
Recommended publications
  • Diploma Program__Zheng Zhou.Pdf (7.193Mb)
    OSLO STORIES Learning Centre of 22.July Author Zheng Zhou Supervisor Prof. Beate Marie Hølmebakk April 30, 2018 CONTENT I SYNOPSIS The Evolutionary Revelation I SYNOPSIS The development of a city is accompanied by many stories, and the stories which contain deeply painful II INTRODUCTION can catalyze the maturity and inspire the thinking. Such stories are often be treated as sensitive topics in III FIELD OF INTEREST the moment, and their revelation comes from the wakefulness brought on by pain. However, by time pro- gresses, the wound will eventually heal. So what kind of revelation should we leave behind for our future IV CONTEXT generations? And how should they think about it? There is no doubt that this story is an intangible result of V OUTLINE OF CATEGORY an disaster, but it’s positive value could be realized with architectural language. My project will be an ex- VI FOCUS AND METHOD perience-oriented learning center the Olso city, which based on the Norway terrorist attacks that occurred VII RELEVANT EXAMPLES on July 22, 2011. On the way of exploring, I would also like to discusses the transformation of public identity, VIII WORK FORMAT architectural potential, and common value in the process of urban evolution. IX WORK PLAN II INTRODUCTION Architecture is built. Entrance area with staffed reception (minimum 1 person) The verification of architectural quality comes through perception of built space. Office (minimum 2 people) Meeting room Student’s projects are rarely built, thus the quality of this work must be discussed on other terms than Small coffeeshop (bar + seating for minimum 20 people) those applied on work that is realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Woie, Martine Grasberg.Pdf (4.277Mb)
    Martine Grasberg Woie Martine Grasberg Woie Martine Grasberg Terroristens legitimeringer Fascisme og kontrajihadisme i Anders Behring Breiviks forestillingsverden Masteroppgave i historie - femårig lektorutdanning Masteroppgave Trondheim, november 2015 Terroristens legitimeringer; fascisme og kontrajihadisme i Anders Behring Breiviks forestillingsverden Behring Breiviks i Anders og kontrajihadisme fascisme legitimeringer; Terroristens NTNU Det humanistiske fakultet Det humanistiske Institutt for historiske studier historiske for Institutt Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet teknisk-naturvitenskapelige Norges Forord Masteroppgaven har vært en lang prosess. Ikke bare er den et resultat av det arbeidet som er lagt ned det siste året, men også gjennom alle mine studieår i Trondheim. I den sammenheng er det flere jeg vil takke. For det første går en takk til min veileder Ola Svein Stugu som hadde tro på mitt prosjekt, så et potensiale, og som ledet meg i riktig retning. For det andre må Marianne Christiansen takkes for grundig gjennomlesing og språkkorrigeringer. Takk til alle mine studievenner som har gjort både studier, og hverdagen til en stor glede. Takk til familie som har kommet med gode råd, kritiske spørsmål og omtanke. Sist, men ikke minst, går en stor takk til min bedre halvdel, som alltid stiller opp. Din støtte er uvurderlig. i ii Innholdsfortegnelse 1. Innledning ......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Problemstillinger
    [Show full text]
  • JUDGMENT Given 18 October 2019 by the Supreme Court Composed of Justice Magnus Matningsdal Justice Wilhelm Matheson Justice
    JUDGMENT given 18 October 2019 by the Supreme Court composed of Justice Magnus Matningsdal Justice Wilhelm Matheson Justice Ragnhild Noer Justice Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen Justice Kine Steinsvik HR-2019-1929-A (sak nr. 19-029021SIV-HRET) Appeal against Gulating Court of Appeal’s judgment 2 January 2019 Propiedades Rott SL (Counsel Leif Inge Håland) v. Trond Lie Nilsen (Counsel Finn Eide) (1) Justice Arntzen: The case concerns financial settlement after the cancellation of an agreement for purchase of a flat in Spain. (2) In the spring 2014, Trond Lie Nilsen entered into an agreement with Propiedades Rott SL (hereafter referred to as Propiedades) for purchase of a flat in a planned building project in Villajoyosa, Spain. Propiedades is a company registered in Spain engaging in property development directed to the Norwegian market, among others. Ninety percent of the shares in the company are owned by Valor AS, which in turn is owned by the Norwegian Terje Rott and his family who have residence in Norway. Nilsen is a Norwegian citizen with residence in Norway. He bought the flat for private use. (3) On 7 March 2014, the parties signed a “binding purchase confirmation”. The purchase confirmation was written in Norwegian and signed in Norway. The purchase price was EUR 660 000 with the addition of 10 percent Spanish VAT (IVA). Upon signing, Nilsen transferred a “deposit” of EUR 11 000 to the seller’s Spanish bank account. (4) The agreement was revised twice in 2015, latest by a “binding purchase agreement” signed 25 September 2015 in Spain. The seller’s deadline for having the flat ready for takeover was set to 1 June 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Awaiting Breivik's Verdict
    (Periodicals postage paid in Seattle, WA) TIME-DATED MATERIAL — DO NOT DELAY Taste of Norway Roots & Connections Sound Spirits Barneblad: Aquavit: Gode venner er engler som løfter Fun with balloons oss opp igjen når våre vinger har That’s the spirit! glemt hvordan det er å fly. for kids of all ages Read more on page 8 – Nils Bredesen Read more on page 10 Norwegian American Weekly Vol. 123 No. 26 June 29, 2012 Established May 17, 1889 • Formerly Western Viking and Nordisk Tidende $1.50 per copy Norway.com News Find more at www.norway.com Awaiting Breivik’s verdict News The recent Oil Fund move to July 22 trial ends buy property based from tax haven Luxembourg is under fire after 10 weeks from Norwegian-born French corruption hunter Eva Joly. “I of emotionally cannot understand how it’s pos- charged sible to set up a branch of the Oil Fund in a tax haven. It should testimonies be prohibited,” said a shocked Joly to Klassekampen. NOK STAFF COMPILATION 6.6 billion (almost USD 1.1 Norwegian American Weekly billion) was invested in compa- nies registered in tax havens the “The funeral gave me moti- Cayman Islands, Jersey, Guern- sey, and Luxembourg last year. vation. The multicultural Norway Answering Eva Joly’s censure, I’m so proud of. It showed that he Labor (Ap) Deputy Minister of failed. And we must be proud of it. Finance Hilde Singsaas stated Bano did not die in vain. She died there is nothing unusual about for the multicultural Norway.” establishing a property fund in Lara Rashid was one of the Luxembourg when investing in five witnesses to testify on the last more than one country.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Terror in Europe? the Bible in Anders Behring Breivik's Manifesto
    J Bible Recept 2017; 4(1): 147–169 Hannah Strømmen* Christian Terror in Europe? The Bible in Anders Behring Breivik’s Manifesto DOI 10.1515/jbr-2017-2006 Abstract: In the attempts to understand the ideology underpinning the terror attack in Norway 22nd July 2011, and the growth of far-right extremism in Europe more generally, Christianity and the uses of the Bible are a largely neglected feature. In this article, I examine the way in which the Bible is used in Anders Behring Breivik’s manifesto, arguing that this provides an important example of the role of Christianity in far-right discourse. I show that the Bible functions as a legitimating device, glossing violence as defense of a Christian Europe; as a motivational instrument, positing God as a fellow fighter; and, as an origin for Europe. The Bible is situated in a pre-modern state where its signifying powers are policed. At the same time, it is wrenched out of this solidified framework, cut up and pasted into the manifesto hypertext in order to serve as a contemporary ally to an anti-Muslim and anti-multicultural cause. Keywords: Terror; Bible; Christianity; far right; Breivik; Europe. 1 Introduction On 22nd July 2011, Anders Behring Breivik dressed in a fake police uniform, drove to the Government Headquarters (the government office buildings), in Oslo (Regjeringskvartalet) and planted a bomb, which detonated shortly thereafter. He then gained entry to the island of Utøya, where the Norwegian Labour party’s youth organization [Arbeidernes Ungdomsfylking (AUF)] held their annual political summer camp, and shot indiscriminately at the young people there.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in the United States and Norway
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations Sociology & Criminal Justice Summer 2016 What Can State Talk Tell Us About Punitiveness? A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in The United States and Norway Kimberlee G. Waggoner Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds Part of the Criminology Commons, Scandinavian Studies Commons, and the Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance Commons Recommended Citation Waggoner, Kimberlee G.. "What Can State Talk Tell Us About Punitiveness? A Comparison of Responses to Political Mass Shootings in The United States and Norway" (2016). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Sociology & Criminal Justice, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/6e42-3262 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_etds/10 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology & Criminal Justice at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHAT CAN STATE TALK TELL US ABOUT PUNITIVENESS? A COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO POLITICAL MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY by Kimberlee G. Waggoner B.S. May 2009, Northern Arizona University M.S. May 2011, Northern Arizona University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY CRIMINOLOGY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY August 2016 Approved by: Randolph Myers (Director) Mona J.E. Danner (Member) Tim Goddard (Member) ABSTRACT WHAT CAN STATE TALK TELL US ABOUT PUNITIVENESS? A COMPARISON OF RESPONSES TO POLITICAL MASS SHOOTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES AND NORWAY Kimberlee G.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Now (PDF)
    CONTENTS SPRING 2012 03 Editorial Erlend Osland Simensen 04 The Controversy on Anders Behring Breivik’s Mental Health Sissel Myklebust 08 Wine will Save the World Economy! Christian Guttormsen 10 Going Green - Why Sometimes, Beauty is Only Skin Deep Chris King 13 Networking - A Necessary Evil? - An InterESST Event Siren E. F. Hole 14 Academic Spring? The Elsevier Boycott Ruben Soler 16 The Nuclear Renaissance Anders Rindal 17 Cured and Disease Free? Katrina Davis 20 When to Stop Saving a Life? Anina Bjørnhaug 23 The Junk Food Generation Ane Hagtvedt 26 Five Blades to Rule them All? Andreas Dopplemayr 29 Confessions of a Lecturer Kristin Asdal 30 The New Munch Museum in Oslo - Lamda ‘screams’ back Jeta L. Andreassen 32 Travelogue: Maastricht Edith F. Akerø and Espen Karlsen 34 3 at TIK Marianne Austheim Teknovatøren is a semi-scientific magazine published by the master students at the Centre for Technol- ogy, Innovation and Culture, Uni- versity of Oslo. Teknovatøren seeks to illuminate issues on technologi- cal development, innovation and knowledge production. EDITORIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS The word controversy originates from the Latin word “controversia”, whereas “contra” can be trans- Chairman: Stefan Jøines lated as against, and “vertere” (or versus) to turn. Executive Editor: Consequently is the mythological meaning of con- Erlend Osland Simensen troversy “to turn against”. For those of us that are Head of Finance: Simen Enger interested in what happens when technology and Head of Marketing & Innovation: society meet, controversies often get significant Marianne Austheim attention. The thing about controversies is that they Art Director: Katrina Davis show clearly the dynamic interactions between dif- Webmaster: Andreas Doppelmayr ferent social groups.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Fakultet for Utdanningsvitenskap Og Humaniora MASTEROPPGAVE
    Fakultet for utdanningsvitenskap og humaniora MASTEROPPGAVE Studieprogram: Vårsemesteret, 2018 Lektorprogram i humanistiske fag Åpen Forfatter: Ingrid Forsell (signatur forfatter) Veileder: Alexandre Dessingué Tittel på masteroppgaven: Etableringen av 22. juli-senteret: En undersøkelse av diskursen i media Engelsk tittel: The Establishment of the 22 July Center: A Survey of the Discourse in Media Emneord: Antall ord : 28855 Minner Minnestudier Kollektive minner 22. juli-senteret Stavanger, 18.05.2018. 22. juli 2011 1 Forord Arbeidet med denne masteroppgaven har gjort at det siste året både har vært utfordrende og innholdsrikt. Det har vært svært spennende å fordype seg i et emne som er veldig aktuelt, samtidig som det sier noe om historie. Oppgaven hadde ikke vært mulig å gjennomføre uten det mangfoldige mediebildet, så en stor takk til de som bidrar til å skape denne diskursen. Oppgaven kunne heller aldri komt i stand uten råd og tips fra min veileder, så mange takk til Alexandre Dessingué. Jeg vil også si tusen hjertelig takk til alle mine nærmeste medstudenter for alle gangene vi har delt bord, råd, sorg, glede og mat. En ekstra takk til Stine Mærland for å gi meg praktisk informasjon og passe på at min distré hjerne har holdt seg på rett kjøl. 2 Innholdsfortegnelse 1. Introduksjon ......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Problemstilling .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oslo Tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-22 Instans Oslo Tingrett - Beslutning
    Utskrift fra Lovdata - 10.03.2015 10:44 Oslo tingrett - TOSLO-2011-188627-22 Instans Oslo tingrett - Beslutning. Dato 2012-06-08 Publisert TOSLO-2011-188627-22 Stikkord 22. juli-saken. Sammendrag Rettens beslutning om kringkasting av vitne. Domstolloven § 131a. Saksgang Oslo tingrett TOSLO-2011-188627-22 (11-188627MED- OTIR/05). Parter Den offentlige påtalemyndighet (statsadvokat Svein Holden, statsadvokat Inga Bejer Engh) mot A (advokat Geir Lippestad, advokat Vibeke Hein Bæra, advokat Tord Eskild Kvinge Jordet, advokatfullmektig Odd Ivar Aursnes Grøn). Forfatter Tingrettsdommer Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen, tingrettsdommer Arne Lyng. Meddommere: Ernst Henning Eielsen, Diana Patricia Fynbo, Anne Elisabeth Wisløff. 8. juni - Rettens beslutning om kringkasting av vitnet Malt: Retten legger til grunn at vitnets gjenstående forklaring vil omhandle alternative fortolkninger av de observasjoner de sakkyndige har redegjort for i sine rapporter. Dette kan kaste lys over om tiltalte var psykotisk 22. juli 2011, og den privatengasjerte sakkyndige kan forklare seg om dette selv om det samtidig innebærer vurdering av alternative diagnoser. De alternative diagnosene synes behandlet i de sakkyndiges rapporter, i hvert fall i rapporten fra Tørrissen og Aspaas. Retten har ikke fått overlevert det notatet vitnet benytter under sin forklaring, og som partene har fått tilsendt. Retten anser vitnet som en privatengasjert sakkyndig etter straffeprosessloven § 149. Og som privatengasjert sakkyndig har han fremlagt en kopi av foilene i sin powerpointpresentasjon, som er å anse som et hjelpedokument for retten som kan sammenlignes med en disposisjon. Etter rettens mening vil kringkasting ikke få uheldig virkning for behandling av saken og den vil heller ikke medføre en urimelig belastning for tiltalte.
    [Show full text]
  • Rettsprosessene
    Tematekst Rettsprosessene Hvordan har det norske rettsvesenet behandlet gjerningsmannen? Etter terrorangrepene 22. juli 2011 ble gjerningsmannen dømt som tilregnelig til 21 års forvaring med en minstetid på ti år. Fornærmede og etterlatte har fått voldsoffererstatning. Både straffesaken mot terroristen og erstatningssakene for å avgjøre voldsoffererstatning var utfordrende for det norske rettsvesenet, på grunn av omfanget av sakene og den voldsomme interessen fra offentligheten. Under de første avhørene av Breivik på Utøya etter pågripelsen ga han inntrykk av at det var sannsynlig med flere nært forestående angrep. I løpet av avhør på politihuset den 23. juli 2011 – etter at Geir Lippestad var oppnevnt til Breiviks forsvarer – ble det etter hvert klart at trusselen om nye angrep ikke var reell. Det var Breivik som ba om Lippestad som forsvarsadvokat. For å ivareta rettsstaten – som Breivik hadde angrepet – tok Lippestad oppdraget. Hvorvidt gjerningsmannen var psykotisk (ofte omtalt som «sinnssyk» eller «gal»), eller om han kunne dømmes som tilregnelig, var et stort og betent spørsmål helt fra arrestasjonen og frem til domfellelsen. Det kan også fortsatt ansees som betent. Det henger sammen med at så godt som alle de som er enige med Breivik når det gjelder skepsis til et flerkulturelt samfunn og innvandring, mente terroraksjonen var en gal og forkastelig måte å gi uttrykk for denne skepsisen på. Dersom Breivik var utilregnelig, kunne handlingene hans forklares som psykotiske og ikke som voldelige uttrykk for ideologiske standpunkt. Terrorhandlingenes brutalitet fikk imidlertid mange – uavhengig av ideologi – til å mene at Breivik måtte være «gal» - altså utilregnelig. Aktorene Inga Bejer Engh og Svein Holden la i tiltalen ned påstand om utilregnelighet, med støtte i den første rettspsykiatriske utredningen, men ikke i den andre.
    [Show full text]
  • Breivik's Sanity: Historical and Contemporary Right-Wing Political Violence in Norway Colin Jacobsen
    Florida State University Libraries Honors Theses The Division of Undergraduate Studies 2013 Breivik's Sanity: Historical and Contemporary Right-Wing Political Violence in Norway Colin Jacobsen Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE BREIVIK’S SANITY: HISTORICAL AND CONTEMPORARY RIGHT-WING POLITICAL VIOLENCE IN NORWAY By COLIN JACOBSEN A Thesis submitted to the College of Criminology and Criminal Justice in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring, 2013 The members of the Defense Committee approve the thesis of Colin Jacobsen defended on April 18, 2013. ______________________________ Daniel Maier-Katkin Thesis Director ______________________________ Sumner B. Twiss Outside Committee Member ______________________________ Terry Coonan Committee Member ______________________________ Nathan Stoltzfus Committee Member ii Acknowledgements I am sincerely grateful and humble for the help, insight, guidance and support I have been fortunate to receive through a challenging, memorable, and rewarding research journey, for without this I could not have established a final piece which has been greatly invigorated and transcended by the many I worked with. I wish to express my sincerest gratitude to my mentor and Thesis Director Professor Daniel Maier-Katkin, who has through exceptional guidance and pedagogy revealed to me new avenues of learning, fascinating advice on the life of the mind, and inspired me to aspire towards excellent writing and articulation; his expertise and guidance has undeniably steered me on to path of academic success that already carries an impact on to my future career prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • The 22 July Massacre in Norway Was Fake Part 5
    The 22 July Massacre in Norway was Fake part 5 1 What is history? The lie that everyone agrees on. —Voltaire by Aurora Alberios First published February 21, 2020 This is a follow-up paper to the series of papers that Miles wrote on the Norway massacre, which purpose is to provide a wider context for the 22nd of July events in 2011. In Norway, the Breivik massacre is simply known as 22/7 or 22nd of July. People will just give the date and everyone knows what you mean. Since we don’t have too many terrorist events in this country, 22/7 came as a shock to people and many used the word surreal to describe it. Such things happen in American cities or London or Paris and not here. Most people think of Norway as a quiet and peaceful corner of the world where nothing much happens and so 22/7 stood out as an oddity, something that didn’t fit in with the rest. We learned from Miles’ papers that this didn’t start in 2011 as we could follow the lines from several central figures of the event all the way back to WW2. In this essay, I will provide some extra background material that is less accessible. I won’t focus on just one event or person, rather I will try to weave a tapestry within which 22/7 will seem like less of an oddity. While most people who have looked at this event managed to spot the fake victims of the Oslo bombings, very few except for Miles, Cluesforum and some obscure blogs have suggested that the Island shootings were also faked.
    [Show full text]