Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 15, 28699–28747, 2015 www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/15/28699/2015/ doi:10.5194/acpd-15-28699-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in ACP if available. Interferences in photolytic NO2 measurements: explanation for an apparent missing oxidant? C. Reed1, M. J. Evans1,2, P. Di Carlo3,4, J. D. Lee1,2, and L. J. Carpenter1 1Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK 2NCAS, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK 3Centre of Excellence CEMTEPs, Universita’ degli studi di L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67010 Coppito, L’Aquila, Italy 4Dipartmento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Universita’ degli studi di L’Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67010 Coppito, L’Aquila, Italy Received: 6 October 2015 – Accepted: 7 October 2015 – Published: 23 October 2015 Correspondence to: J. D. Lee (
[email protected]) Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 28699 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract Measurement of NO2 at low concentrations is non-trivial. A variety of techniques exist, with the conversion of NO2 into NO followed by chemiluminescent detection of NO be- ing prevalent. Historically this conversion has used a catalytic approach (Molybdenum); 5 however this has been plagued with interferences. More recently, photolytic conversion based on UV-LED irradiation of a reaction cell has been used.