Vulnerability of Family Livestock Farming on the Livramento-Rivera Border of Brazil and Uruguay: Comparative Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Vulnerability of family livestock farming on the Livramento-Rivera border of Brazil and Uruguay: Comparative analysis Paulo D. Waquil1* Marcio Z. Neske1 Claudio M. Ribeiro2,3 Fabio E. Schlick2 Tanice Andreatta4 Cleiton Perleberg4 Marcos F.S. Borba5 Jose P. Trindade5 Rafael Carriquiry6,7 Italo Malaquin7 Alejandro Saravia7,8 Mario Gonzales9 Livio S.D. Claudino10 Keywords Summary Cattle, family farm, risk factor, Social, ecological, and economic sciences have all shown interest in studying ET FILIÈRES SYSTÈMES D’ÉLEVAGE Brazil, Uruguay the social group called family livestock farmers. The main characteristic of this ■ group, which is present in the Pampa biome in Southern Brazil and Uruguay, Accepted: 21 December 2014; Published: is beef cattle production based on family work on small lands, expressing an 25 March 2016 autonomous way of life which is, however, highly dependent on strong relations with the physical environment and marked by risk aversion. In this study we made a comparative analysis of vulnerability factors of family livestock farm- ing in Brazil and Uruguay. We also compared these social actors’ perceptions of risks, and the strategies built to mitigate threats. A survey was thus carried out and included 16 family livestock farmers’ interviews, eight in each country, near the cities of Santana do Livramento (Brazil) and Rivera (Uruguay). Although these cities are next to each other on each side of the border and thus present environmental similarities, we chose them because family farming was not sub- jected to the same political and economic conditions which might (or might not) have influenced farmers’ perceptions and reactions. Results showed that live- stock farmers were mainly affected by vulnerabilities arising from external ele- ments such as the climate (e.g. droughts or harsh winters), but also from internal elements (lack of land access and successors). From the family livestock farmers’ standpoint, the highest risks to their production systems and social system repro- duction were more related to climate than to price and market variations. ■ How to cite this article: Waquil P.D., Neske M.Z., Ribeiro C.M., Schlick F.E., Andreatta T., Perleberg C., Borba M.F.S., Trindade J.P., Carriquiry R., Malaquin I., Saravia A., Gonzales M., Claudino L.S.D., 2015. Vulnerability of family livestock farming on the Livramento-Rivera border of Brazil and Uruguay: Com- parative analysis. Rev. Elev. Med. Vet. Pays Trop., 68 (2-3): 55-59 ■ INTRODUCTION Social, ecological, and economic sciences have all shown interest in studying the social group called family livestock farmers. This 1. Graduate Program in Rural Development, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande group, which exists in significant numbers in the Pampa biome in do Sul, Av. João Pessoa, 31 Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil 90.040-000. Brazil and Uruguay, is characterized by the production of beef cat- 2. EMATER/RS, Bagé, Brazil. tle based predominantly on family work in small areas, expressing 3. URCAMP, Bagé, Brazil. an autonomous way of life marked by risk aversion and dependent 4. UNIPAMPA, Dom Pedrito, Brazil. on strong relations with the physical environment. This relation is 5. EMBRAPA, CPPSul, Bagé, Brazil. 6. UDELAR, Rivera, Uruguay. through the appropriation of nature, with typical elements of the 7. Instituto Plan Agropecuário, Taquarembó, Uruguay. agricultural premodernization period, using primarily energy from 8. AgroParisTech, Paris, France. nature, with a low degree of manipulation of environmental ele- 9. EMATER/RS, Santana do Livramento, Brazil. ments and changes in the landscape. 10. Universidade Federal do Pará, Brazil. In general, family livestock farming derives from the dispute for * Corresponding author Tel.: +55 (51) 33 08 31 09; Email: [email protected] agricultural space with activities that use industrial inputs, industrial models of production, processing and distribution, i.e. crop or live- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ stock production able to provide larger levels of intensification. As a tropicaux, 2015, 68 (2-3) : 55-59 des pays et de médecine vétérinaire Revue d’élevage 55 Family livestock farmers on the Brazil-Uruguay border result, historically family livestock farming occupied marginal areas international institutions. In this sense, social vulnerability takes that, besides having little interest for capitalism, required innovative into account the insecurity and exposure to risks and disruptions approaches, both technological and organizational, to fulfill its pro- caused by events or economic changes considering at the same ductive potential. This situation has been keeping this group with lit- time resource availability and strategies that the families adopt to tle relation to the agricultural modernization and access to markets, cope with the impacts that affect them (Alves et al., 2008). but has been providing an important degree of autonomy, responsi- In agreement with De Sherbinin et al. (2007), in social sciences ble for its own sociocultural and economic survival. vulnerability has been considered the result of three main factors: The strategies of social reproduction of family livestock farming the degree of risk exposure, the susceptibility to risk and the may be under threat from a number of factors including the contin- adaptive capacity (resilience) before risk materialization. In this ued lack of awareness of the institutions responsible for generating regard, the situation of higher vulnerability would occur for those appropriate innovations to this complex reality, coupled with cul- people or social groups that in the midst of a dangerous situation tural traits that hinder more advanced levels of social organization, have a lesser ability to recover (Moser, 1998). For Sen (2001) besides the lack of specific public policies for family livestock vulnerability combines a situation that involves the notion of farming, the rearrangements of agrarian capitalism – which redis- basic capabilities of individuals from exposure to a risk situation covers the potential of marginalized areas –, drift from the land since in these cases the individuals are worsening their well-being especially by young people and women, as well as phenomena like situation (deprivation of their freedom). Thus, the higher degree climate changes. of vulnerability (risk exposure) is proportional to the increase in poverty. The aim of this paper was to make a comparative evaluation on the aspects that cause vulnerability of family livestock farming in the According to Bole et al. [quoted by Mayorga and Mayorga (2011)] border region between Brazil and Uruguay, as well as these social the most vulnerable individuals, groups, classes and regions are SYSTÈMES D’ÉLEVAGE ET FILIÈRES SYSTÈMES D’ÉLEVAGE actors’ perceptions on the risks and strategies forged to mitigate those who find themselves with a considerable level of exposure ■ the threats. to disturbances and have limited mitigation ability, suffering more from the impacts of socioeconomic or environmental crises and, finally, with reduced ability to recover after a crisis. ■ BRIEF REVIEW ON VULNERABILITY Part of these findings about the predictability of the future in terms In the context of processes of socioeconomic and environmental of the past lies in the fact that some strategies adopted by individu- changes that have been perceived in contemporary societies, the als to overcome disturbances are derived from experiences lived in term vulnerability has emerged as an important heuristic tool for the past (Chambers, 2006). Knowing these strategies is a key step the analysis of events of different nature, intensity and conse- to make predictions about the possible reactions to be adopted by quences. In Latin America, a general analysis on the overview of individuals. Ribot (1995), in a study carried out in semiarid regions rurality shows that since the 1990s there has been an intensifica- in the tropics, notes that the identification of strategies adopted by tion of social inequalities, reflected in the increase of social exclu- inlanders to face drought supplies important elements to develop sion and rural poverty (Schejtmann and Berdegue, 2003), increase policies that will reduce vulnerability, as it is necessary to know the of tensions and conflicts in the countryside (Kay, 2007), and means of problem solving (adopted strategies) that the individuals expansion of environmental problems caused by rampant actions have, that is, it should focus primarily on how they perceive their toward the appropriation and use of natural resources for the ser- own vulnerability. vice of the capitalist economy (Leff, 2000). These are the most vis- Chambers (2006) points out that the vision focused on experts’ opin- ible consequences of a modern society that is in a state of crisis ion only may not reflect reality because the needs of the poorest has and increasingly ‘manufactures’ uncertainties (Giddens, 1991). been formulated in parts from models designed by the wealthier In this sense, the notion of uncertainty becomes a key element to dominant group. For this author it is necessary to know what they understand the new socio-spatial arrangements, and vulnerability (whether individuals or groups) perceive as vulnerability and capture constitutes a promising element to understand the present uncer- the symbolic factors involving needs and priorities. tainty under different spatial and temporal dynamics (Marandola Considering the nuances between the two – theoretical and onto- and Hogan, 2006). logical