DOCSLIB.ORG

L-1 . Planting Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1/L-1 - SEE ENLARGEMENT THIS SHEET PLANTING PLAN 1" = 20'-0" (CHECK SCALE BAR FOR ACCURACY) 588 Gaultheria shallon 70% 84 Oemleria cerasiformis 10% 84 Ribes sanguineum 10% 84 Symphoricarpos albus 10% 3 Acer circinatum 8% 13 Gaultheria shallon 40% 381 Gaultheria shallon 70% 3 Oemleria cerasiformis 8% 28 Acer circinatum 8% 55 Oemleria cerasiformis 10% 140 Gaultheria shallon 40% 5 Pseudotsuga menziesii 13% 55 Ribes sanguineum 10% 3 Ribes sanguineum 8% 28 Oemleria cerasiformis 8% 55 Symphoricarpos albus 10% 3 Acer circinatum 8% 46 Pseudotsuga menziesii 13% 3 Symphoricarpos albus 8% 12 Gaultheria shallon 40% 88 Gaultheria shallon 70% 5 Thuja plicata 15% 28 Ribes sanguineum 8% 13 Oemleria cerasiformis 10% 3 Oemleria cerasiformis 8% 28 Symphoricarpos albus 8% 13 Ribes sanguineum 10% 4 Pseudotsuga menziesii 13% 53 Thuja plicata 15% 13 Symphoricarpos albus 10% 13 Acer circinatum 8% 3 Ribes sanguineum 8% 65 Gaultheria shallon 40% 3 Symphoricarpos albus 8% 13 Oemleria cerasiformis 8% 5 Thuja plicata 15% 21 Pseudotsuga menziesii 13% 13 Ribes sanguineum 8% 13 Symphoricarpos albus 8% 25 Thuja plicata 15% 56 Gaultheria shallon 70% 8 Oemleria cerasiformis 10% 8 Ribes sanguineum 10% 8 Symphoricarpos albus 10% 38 Acer circinatum 15% 38 Cornus stolonifera 15% 152 Gaultheria shallon 60% 5 Acer circinatum 8% 26 Ribes sanguineum 10% 13 Acer circinatum 8% 21 Gaultheria shallon 40% 65 Gaultheria shallon 40% 5 Oemleria cerasiformis 8% 13 Oemleria cerasiformis 8% 7 Pseudotsuga menziesii 13% 22 Pseudotsuga menziesii 13% 5 Ribes sanguineum 8% 13 Ribes sanguineum 8% 5 Symphoricarpos albus 8% 13 Symphoricarpos albus 8% 8 Thuja plicata 15% 25 Thuja plicata 15% 7 Acer circinatum 15% 7 Cornus stolonifera 15% 26 Gaultheria shallon 60% 5 Ribes sanguineum 10% 15 Acer circinatum 15% 15 Cornus stolonifera 15% 57 Gaultheria shallon 60% 10 Ribes sanguineum 10% 3 Acer circinatum 8% 8 Acer circinatum 15% 15 Gaultheria shallon 40% 8 Cornus stolonifera 15% 3 Oemleria cerasiformis 8% 32 Gaultheria shallon 60% 5 Pseudotsuga menziesii 13% 6 Ribes sanguineum 10% 3 Ribes sanguineum 8% 3 Symphoricarpos albus 8% 6 Thuja plicata 15% LARGE BOULDERS PLACED AS STONE 1/L-1; ENLARGEMENT PLANTING PLAN OUTCROPPING TO RETAIN GRADE GENERAL NOTES PLANTING LEGEND (overall site) 1. MINIMUM SIZE - 3 MAN (QUANTITY #1) Trees 2 MAN (QUANTITY #2) 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED BY PERSONS FAMILIAR WITH THIS KIND OF WORK AND UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A 1" = 10'-0" QUALIFIED FOREMAN. Num | Species Common Name Abbrev. | Planting Size 2. BOULDERS TO BE 1/3RD BURRIIED 136 Acer circinatum Vine Maple ACvm 2' TSUME 2. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SIZES AND QUALITY TO CONFORM TO AMERICAN ASSOC. OF NURSERYMEN, AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, MOST RECENT VERSION Conifer Num | Species Common Name Abbrev. | Planting Size ACvm 3. PLANT LOCATIONS ON THE PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO ADJUSTMENT IN THE FIELD BY THE 110 Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir PSEME 2' LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR and THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 127 Thuja plicata Giant arborvitae THPL 2' 4. DISTRIBUTION OF PLANTS OVER DISTURBED AREAS OF THE SITE IS TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE LIMITS OF WORK Shrubs SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE RECEIVE PLANTINGS. Num | Species Common Name Abbrev. | Container Size 5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE OF NURSERY STOCK AND SHALL BE OF THE TYPE, SIZE AND CONDITION SPECIFIED. THE 68 Cornus stolonifera Red-twig dogwood CORST #1 GSs PLANT MATERIAL SHALL EXHIBIT NORMAL HABITS OF GROWTH FOR THE SPECIES, SHALL HAVE BUDS INTACT AND SHALL 1711 Gaultheria shallon Salal GSs #1 BE FREE OF DISEASE, INSECTS, SCARS, BRUISES, BREAKS, SEED AND WEED ROOTS. 228 Oemleria cerasiformis Indian Plum OEMCE #1 275 Ribes sanguineum Wintercurrant RSw #1 6. SEE NOTES THIS SET FOR TOPSOIL DEPTH AND SPECIFICATION. 228 Symphoricarpos albus Common snowberry SYAL #1 PMsf 7. ARBORIST WOOD CHIPS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES. ** Landscape approval is conditioned upon CONTRACTOR MAY USE CHIPS GENERATED DURING THE CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE PARKING LOT AREA. SEE compliance with the attached landscape plan notes DETAIL FOR EXTENT OF MULCH FOR EACH PLANT. and details. Landscape inspection report required 8. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE PLANTING BACKFILL AMENDED WITH A WETTING AGENT (TERAWET OR EQUAL) before project is finaled CSkel APPLIED AT MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDED RATE. 9. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL SITE UTILITIES PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE IMPLEMENTATION. PLANT LOCATIONS MAY BE ADJUSTED TO AVOID CONFLICT. 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, PAVING, WALLS, AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO 1/L-1;Header ENLARGEMENT PLANTING LEGEND ADDITIONAL COST. Trees Symbol | Num | Species Common Name Abbrev. | Planting Size 11. PLANT COUNT IS FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE; IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 10 Acer circinatum Vine Maple ACvm 5' min ACTUAL PLANT QUANTITIES TO BE DETERMINED BY REQUIRED PLANT SPACING. Conifer 12. MANY AREAS TO BE PLANTED ARE INDICATED ON THE PLAN WITH A HATCH PATTERN. SEE PLANT LIST FOR PLANT TYPE Symbol | Num | Species Common Name Abbrev. | Planting Size AND SIZE 3 Tsuga mertensiana Mountain Hemlock TSUME 3' ht min. 13. SPACING OF ALL PLANTS IN HATCH AREA IS BETWEEN 36" AND 48". ALL QUANTITIES TO BE INSTALLED, FIELD FIT TO DETERMINE SPACING. Shrubs Symbol | Num | Species Common Name Abbrev. | Container Size 14. SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT VARIETIES DUE TO LACK OF AVAILABILITY SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS 15 Cornus stolonifera 'Kelseyi' Red Osier Dogwood 'Kelseyi' CSkel #2 REPRESENTATIVE. 61 Gaultheria shallon Salal GSs #2 15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ASSUMED TO BE PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Perennials Symbol | Num | Species Common Name Abbrev. | Container Size 16. ALL SOIL GRADES TO BE A MINIMUM SIX INCHES BELOW ADJACENT ELEVATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 91 Polystichum munitum Sword Fern PMsf #1 17. ALL GRADES, DIMENSIONS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO one inch Groundcover PLAN19-0014 Rebecca Lowell Symbol | Num | Species Common Name Abbrev. | Container Size CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ** see above 55 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi Kinnikinnick AUken #1 April 13, 2019 18. BASEMAP PROVIDED BY SEMRAU SURVEYORS AND ENGINEERS, MOUNT VERNON, WA 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' NORTH NO. DATE REVISION BY REV. prepared for: prepared by: STATE OF SCALES: ISSUE DATE: 4.5.19 WASHINGTON Landscape Architecture and Planning REGISTERED Parking Area at Little Mountain Park HORIZONTAL : 1" = 20' DRAWING: 1302LMPland Mount Vernon Parks and Recreation Mount Vernon, WA 98273 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLANTING PLAN p. 360.419.7400 VERTICAL : N/A JOB NO.: 1302 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 f. 800.508.2017 www.eccosdesign.com DESIGNED: PD . SHEET: contact: Bill King / James Weppler PATRIK DYLAN eccosDesign contact: Patrik Dylan DRAWN: PD L-1 LLC CERTIFICATE NO. 793 Mount Vernon, WA CHECKED: PD bid set OF 2 SECTION 329000 - LANDSCAPE PLANTING PART 1 - GENERAL 3.04 MULCH 1.01 SCOPE D. Plants are to be nursery grown unless otherwise specified herein. A. General: Apply mulch evenly to all shrub and plant beds to a depth of 6 inches and as indicated on drawings. A. General: Provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for completion of landscaping shown on drawings or specified herein, including but E. Container Stock: Provide container stock plants which have grown in container in which delivered for a minimum of 6 months, but not over 2 years. not limited to installation of topsoil, plant material, clean-up and maintenance through final acceptance. Do not handle container stock by tops, stems or trunks. Root-bound plants and containers with weeds are not acceptable. 3.05 CLEAN UP 1.02 RELATED WORK F. Balled and Burlapped Stock (B&B): Dug with firm, natural balls of soil around roots; ball diameter and depth sufficient to encompass fibrous and A. Remove from site all cans, surplus subsoil and debris resulting from planting and grading operations. Neatly dress and finish planted areas. feeding roots. Wrap with burlap and bind with twine, cord or wire mesh in accordance with ANSI Z60.1. Handle by ball only. Take care to protect A. NONE 3.06 PLANT ESTABLISHMENT AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE ball and plant. Cracked, broken loose or dry-to-the-center balls will not be acceptable. A. Preliminary Inspection and Acceptance: When the work specified herein has been completed, an inspection will be made within 7 days of the G.Bare Root Stock (BR): Remove earth without injury to fibrous root system. Protect from drying by covering with damp sawdust or burlap until 1.03 QUALITY CONTROL contractor's written request. The OWNER's Representative will generate a "punch list" of items that will require revisions or further work to comply planted. Dried or shriveled stock not acceptable. with the contract documents. Preliminary acceptance of the landscaping will be given when items on the punch list have been completed to the A. Materials: Furnish plant materials in accordance with Washington State Grading Code for No.1 Grade; well established and vigorous normal habit satisfaction of the OWNER's Representative. of growth, must be free from disease, approved for quality, size and variety upon delivery at site. Verify prior to bid date all sources of supply and H. Pruning: Do not prune before delivery. Trees with bark sunscalds, broken leaders, disfiguring knots or fresh cuts off limbs over 3/4 inch not completely callused will be rejected. insure availability of listed sizes, species, variety and quality. B. Establishment Period and Maintenance: The establishment period will commence on the date of Preliminary Acceptance, and will extend until Final Acceptance of the entire project. Maintenance during this period to include: B.
Recommended publications
  • Reduction of Diplycosia Indica (2009) to Gaultheria Akaensis (2006)

    Reduction of Diplycosia Indica (2009) to Gaultheria Akaensis (2006)

    Panda, S., J.L. Reveal, and M. Sanjappa. 2012. Reduction of Diplycosia indica (2009) to Gaultheria akaensis (2006). Phytoneuron 2012-35: 1–7. Published 23 April 2012. ISSN 2153 733X REDUCTION OF DIPLYCOSIA INDICA (2009) TO GAULTHERIA AKAENSIS (2006) (ERICACEAE) SUBHASIS PANDA Taxonomy & Biosystematics Laboratory, Post-Graduate Department of Botany Darjeeling Government College, Darjeeling-734101 INDIA [email protected] JAMES L. REVEAL L.H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant Biology Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-4301 USA [email protected] MUNIVENKATAPPA SANJAPPA Former Director, Botanical Survey of India Presently at Botanical Garden, University of Agricultural Sciences GKVK, Bengaluru-560064 INDIA ABSTRACT Diplycosia indica M.R. Debta & H.J. Chowdhery is reduced to synonymy under Gaultheria akaensis Panda & Sanjappa due to a misinterpretation of immature floral features of the type material used by Debta and Chowdhery to establish their new species. KEY WORDS : nomenclature, synonymy, India, Singalelah National Park Diplycosia indica was described by Debta and Chowdhery (2009) based on two specimens collected by M.R. Debta in the Singalelah National Park area of the Darjeeling Himalaya. During the course of recent field studies (mid-December 2011) at different locations in Singalelah National Park as part of post-revisionary work in Indian Ericaceae, specimens of a species of Gaultheria L. were collected near Megma, Megma-Tonglu road and in the Kainyakata-Kalapokhri area on rocky slopes near adjacent road sides. The Gaultheria was identified as G. akaensis Panda & Sanjappa (2006), a critically endangered species then known only from Aka Hill in the Arunachal Himalaya. This expression of G. akaensis from the Singalelah National Park then proved to be identical to the type of D.
  • Coptis Trifolia Conservation Assessment

    Coptis Trifolia Conservation Assessment

    CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT for Coptis trifolia (L.) Salisb. Originally issued as Management Recommendations December 1998 Marty Stein Reconfigured-January 2005 Tracy L. Fuentes USDA Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT FOR COPTIS TRIFOLIA Table of Contents Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 2 Summary........................................................................................................................................ 4 I. NATURAL HISTORY............................................................................................................. 6 A. Taxonomy and Nomenclature.......................................................................................... 6 B. Species Description ........................................................................................................... 6 1. Morphology ................................................................................................................... 6 2. Reproductive Biology.................................................................................................... 7 3. Ecological Roles ............................................................................................................. 7 C. Range and Sites
  • Salal Gaultheria Shallon

    Salal Gaultheria Shallon

    Mountain Loop Conservancy Fact Sheet: Salal Gaultheria shallon Range: Salal grows only in North America and ranges from southeastern Alaska south to central California and east through the western slopes of the coastal ranges and Cascade Mountains. Salal grows from sea level to an elevation of 2,500 feet (763 m). Identification: This shrub grows to a height of 1.3 to 10 feet (0.4 - 3 m). Its evergreen leaves are thick, leathery, and shiny. Leaves are a pointed egg shape and are 2 - 4 inches (5 – 10cm) long. The green leaves grow alternately off stems that are often reddish in color. The lantern- shaped flowers are white to pinkish in color and grow along the ends of stems in showy clusters of 5 -15. They bloom from May 15 – July 1. Salal has a “pseudo berry” that is actually fleshy flower sepals. The berries are 0.24 - 0.4 inch (6 - 10mm) in diameter and reddish-blue to dark purple in color. They are covered with tiny hairs. The fruit is edible and is ripe by August 15. The berries taste a little like huckleberries but they are sweeter and have a drier texture. Salal with berries. Photo by Angie Goodloe © Unique characteristics: This is one of the most common understory plant species in the Pacific Northwest. Salal varies widely in height depending on where they are growing. Their growth can be a low, scraggly form or a tall, almost impenetrable, thicket. Habitat: Salal grows in a wide variety of habitats from coastal dunes to montane forests. It can grow in dry to very wet sites and tolerates sun or shade.
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Dipsacales, with Special Reference to Sinadoxa and Tetradoxa (Adoxaceae)

    Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Dipsacales, with Special Reference to Sinadoxa and Tetradoxa (Adoxaceae)

    PHYLOGENY AND PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY OF DIPSACALES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SINADOXA AND TETRADOXA (ADOXACEAE) MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE,1 TORSTEN ERIKSSON,2 PATRICK A. REEVES,3 AND RICHARD G. OLMSTEAD 3 Abstract. To further clarify phylogenetic relationships within Dipsacales,we analyzed new and previously pub- lished rbcL sequences, alone and in combination with morphological data. We also examined relationships within Adoxaceae using rbcL and nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. We conclude from these analyses that Dipsacales comprise two major lineages:Adoxaceae and Caprifoliaceae (sensu Judd et al.,1994), which both contain elements of traditional Caprifoliaceae.Within Adoxaceae, the following relation- ships are strongly supported: (Viburnum (Sambucus (Sinadoxa (Tetradoxa, Adoxa)))). Combined analyses of C ap ri foliaceae yield the fo l l ow i n g : ( C ap ri folieae (Diervilleae (Linnaeeae (Morinaceae (Dipsacaceae (Triplostegia,Valerianaceae)))))). On the basis of these results we provide phylogenetic definitions for the names of several major clades. Within Adoxaceae, Adoxina refers to the clade including Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa, and Adoxa.This lineage is marked by herbaceous habit, reduction in the number of perianth parts,nectaries of mul- ticellular hairs on the perianth,and bifid stamens. The clade including Morinaceae,Valerianaceae, Triplostegia, and Dipsacaceae is here named Valerina. Probable synapomorphies include herbaceousness,presence of an epi- calyx (lost or modified in Valerianaceae), reduced endosperm,and distinctive chemistry, including production of monoterpenoids. The clade containing Valerina plus Linnaeeae we name Linnina. This lineage is distinguished by reduction to four (or fewer) stamens, by abortion of two of the three carpels,and possibly by supernumerary inflorescences bracts. Keywords: Adoxaceae, Caprifoliaceae, Dipsacales, ITS, morphological characters, phylogeny, phylogenetic taxonomy, phylogenetic nomenclature, rbcL, Sinadoxa, Tetradoxa.
  • Invasive Plants Why They Must Go

    Invasive Plants Why They Must Go

    Make informed choices at the nursery Instead of planting non-native rhododendrons, choose mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia). Each of Periwinkle Pachysandra many delightful varieties has evergreen foliage and INVASIVE flowers in June. Lowbush blueberry Wintergreen Get rid of those privet hedges. Consider planting inkberry holly (Ilex glabra). It is evergreen, grows Groundcovers: know your friends in sandy soil and takes pruning well. If you would WHY THEY MUST GO and foes like your plants to produce berries for birds, then PLANTS you will need to Periwinkle (Vinca minor) plant both Still found in nurseries, this groundcover remains a female and popular choice. Unfortunately, it is not as innocent male shrubs as it looks. The aggressive plant can easily escape (one male for from your yard to a nearby forest and quickly take five female). over the forest floor. Remove those invasive burning bushes! Instead use Pachysandra (Pachysandra terminalis) huckleberries (Gaylussacia baccata). This small or Another common groundcover—and another medium-sized native shrub produces stunning hazard to the natural world. Has been found autumn color. growing in a few reservations on its own. Even In addition, you though it is less aggressive in our climate than (and local periwinkle, this is still an alien plant that does not birds) will add, but only subtracts from the environment. munch on the Instead of these aliens, consider the berries. † Sheep’s-Bit ¢ following lovely native plants for your groundcover: Aka Jasione montana looks pretty! However, this Instead of barberries, try winterberry holly (Ilex alien annual is rapidly invading southeastern Lowbush blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium) verticillata).
  • Mistaken Identity? Invasive Plants and Their Native Look-Alikes: an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic

    Mistaken Identity? Invasive Plants and Their Native Look-Alikes: an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic

    Mistaken Identity ? Invasive Plants and their Native Look-alikes an Identification Guide for the Mid-Atlantic Matthew Sarver Amanda Treher Lenny Wilson Robert Naczi Faith B. Kuehn www.nrcs.usda.gov http://dda.delaware.gov www.dsu.edu www.dehort.org www.delawareinvasives.net Published by: Delaware Department Agriculture • November 2008 In collaboration with: Claude E. Phillips Herbarium at Delaware State University • Delaware Center for Horticulture Funded by: U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Cover Photos: Front: Aralia elata leaf (Inset, l-r: Aralia elata habit; Aralia spinosa infloresence, Aralia elata stem) Back: Aralia spinosa habit TABLE OF CONTENTS About this Guide ............................1 Introduction What Exactly is an Invasive Plant? ..................................................................................................................2 What Impacts do Invasives Have? ..................................................................................................................2 The Mid-Atlantic Invasive Flora......................................................................................................................3 Identification of Invasives ..............................................................................................................................4 You Can Make a Difference..............................................................................................................................5 Plant Profiles Trees Norway Maple vs. Sugar
  • Management Recommendations for Native Insect Pollinators in Texas

    Management Recommendations for Native Insect Pollinators in Texas

    Management Recommendations for Native Insect Pollinators in Texas Texas Parks and Wildlife Department • 4200 Smith School Road • Austin, Texas 78744 • (512) 389-4800 Management Recommendations for Native Insect Pollinators in Texas Developed by Michael Warriner and Ben Hutchins Nongame and Rare Species Program Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Acknowledgements Critical content review was provided by Mace Vaughn, Anne Stine, and Jennifer Hopwood, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation and Shalene Jha Ph.D., University of Texas at Austin. Texas Master Naturalists, Carol Clark and Jessica Womack, provided the early impetus for development of management protocols geared towards native pollinators. Cover photos: Left top to bottom: Ben Hutchins, Cullen Hanks, Eric Isley, Right: Eric Isley Design and layout by Elishea Smith © 2016 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department PWD BK W7000-1813 (04/16) In accordance with Texas State Depository Law, this publication is available at the Texas State Publications Clearinghouse and/or Texas Depository Libraries. TPWD receives federal assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and other federal agencies and is subject to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and state anti-discrimination laws which prohibit discrimination the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any TPWD program, activity or facility, or need more information, please contact Office of Diversity and Inclusive Workforce Management, U.S.
  • Alien Flora of Europe: Species Diversity, Temporal Trends, Geographical Patterns and Research Needs

    Alien Flora of Europe: Species Diversity, Temporal Trends, Geographical Patterns and Research Needs

    Preslia 80: 101–149, 2008 101 Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs Zavlečená flóra Evropy: druhová diverzita, časové trendy, zákonitosti geografického rozšíření a oblasti budoucího výzkumu Philip W. L a m b d o n1,2#, Petr P y š e k3,4*, Corina B a s n o u5, Martin H e j d a3,4, Margari- taArianoutsou6, Franz E s s l7, Vojtěch J a r o š í k4,3, Jan P e r g l3, Marten W i n t e r8, Paulina A n a s t a s i u9, Pavlos A n d r i opoulos6, Ioannis B a z o s6, Giuseppe Brundu10, Laura C e l e s t i - G r a p o w11, Philippe C h a s s o t12, Pinelopi D e l i p e t - rou13, Melanie J o s e f s s o n14, Salit K a r k15, Stefan K l o t z8, Yannis K o k k o r i s6, Ingolf K ü h n8, Hélia M a r c h a n t e16, Irena P e r g l o v á3, Joan P i n o5, Montserrat Vilà17, Andreas Z i k o s6, David R o y1 & Philip E. H u l m e18 1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Hill of Brathens, Banchory, Aberdeenshire AB31 4BW, Scotland, e-mail; [email protected], [email protected]; 2Kew Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, United Kingdom; 3Institute of Bot- any, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; 4Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 01 Praha 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected]; 5Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]; 6University of Athens, Faculty of Biology, Department of Ecology & Systematics, 15784 Athens, Greece, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]; 7Federal Environment Agency, Department of Nature Conservation, Spittelauer Lände 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria, e-mail: [email protected]; 8Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor-Lieser- Str.
  • Pseudotsuga Menziesii

    Pseudotsuga Menziesii

    PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII - ARBUTUS MENZIESII / Douglas-fir - Pacific madrone / salal GAULTHERIA SHALLON Douglas-fir - Pacific madrone / salal Abbreviated Name: PSME-ARME/GASH Vegetation Composition Table (selected species): Con = constancy, the percent of plots within which each species was found; Cov = cover, the mean crown cover of the species in plots where it was found; Sample size = 22 plots + = trace (< 0.5% cover). DISTRIBUTION: Occurs in the northern and central portions of the Puget Trough, including San Juan, Skagit, Island, King, Kitsap, Clallam, Whatcom, Jefferson, Pierce and Thurston Trees Kartesz 2005 Name Con Cov counties. May occur in Snohomish and Mason counties. Also Pacific madrone Arbutus menziesii 100 58 occurs in southwestern BC and reported to occur around the Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii 73 49 southern Willamette Valley of Oregon. Scouler’s willow Salix scouleriana 45 5 grand fir Abies grandis 18 4 GLOBAL/STATE STATUS: G3S2. There are probably less than lodgepole pine Pinus contorta var. contorta 18 4 western redcedar Thuja plicata 14 2 20 relatively good quality occurrences in Washington (11 are western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla 9 2 known). Most sites have been altered by past timber harvest or fragmentation. Development/conversion is a significant threat Shrubs and Dwarf-shrubs and fungal diseases are also a potential threat. salal Gaultheria shallon 100 62 baldhip rose Rosa gymnocarpa 91 3 ID TIPS: Dominated or co-dominated by Pacific madrone. oceanspray Holodiscus discolor 77 11 Western hemlock, western redcedar and grand fir absent or trailing blackberry Rubus ursinus var. macropetalus 68 3 present in small amounts (<10% cover). Understory dominated dwarf Oregongrape Mahonia nervosa 45 8 by salal.
  • New Combinations and New and Resurrected Names in Gaultheria (Ericaceae)

    New Combinations and New and Resurrected Names in Gaultheria (Ericaceae)

    Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 72(2): 299–317. 2020 299 doi: 10.26492/gbs72(2).2020-13 New combinations and new and resurrected names in Gaultheria (Ericaceae) K.A. Kron1, P.W. Fritsch2, L. Lu3 & W.S. Judd4 1Department of Biology, 226 Winston Hall, Box 7325 Reynolda Station, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27109, USA 2Botanical Research Institute of Texas, 1700 University Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA [email protected] 3School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Yunnan Key Laboratory of Pharmacology for Natural Products, Kunming Medical University, CN-650500 Kunming, Yunnan, China 4Department of Biology, University of Florida, 220 Bartram Hall, P.O. Box 118525, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA ABSTRACT. The Wintergreen Group clade of the tribe Gaultherieae (Ericaceae: subfam. Vaccinioideae) comprises the genera Diplycosia Blume, Gaultheria L., and Tepuia Camp. Phylogenetic analysis has demonstrated that Gaultheria is not monophyletic, with Diplycosia and Tepuia nested within it. On morphological grounds, the recognition of a single genus in the Wintergreen Group to establish monophyly as the basis for the classification is favoured over subdivision into smaller genera. Here, we make the taxonomic changes necessary for recognising Gaultheria as the sole genus constituting the Wintergreen Group. We make 126 new combinations, erect 17 new names, and resurrect four species names in Gaultheria for all species, varieties, and forms heretofore recognised in the literature under Diplycosia or Tepuia. Additionally we make two new combinations in Gaultheria at the sectional level to accommodate the species from Diplycosia and Tepuia, and provide lectotypes for Pernettyopsis King & Gamble and Gaultheria [unranked] Amphicalyx Endl. Keywords. Diplycosia, Gaultherieae, Tepuia, wintergreen Introduction The tribe Gaultherieae (Ericaceae: subfam.
  • Phylogenetics of the Caprifolieae and Lonicera (Dipsacales)

    Phylogenetics of the Caprifolieae and Lonicera (Dipsacales)

    Systematic Botany (2008), 33(4): pp. 776–783 © Copyright 2008 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogenetics of the Caprifolieae and Lonicera (Dipsacales) Based on Nuclear and Chloroplast DNA Sequences Nina Theis,1,3,4 Michael J. Donoghue,2 and Jianhua Li1,4 1Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, 22 Divinity Ave, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 U.S.A. 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Conneticut 06520-8106 U.S.A. 3Current Address: Plant Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003 U.S.A. 4Authors for correspondence ([email protected]; [email protected]) Communicating Editor: Lena Struwe Abstract—Recent phylogenetic analyses of the Dipsacales strongly support a Caprifolieae clade within Caprifoliaceae including Leycesteria, Triosteum, Symphoricarpos, and Lonicera. Relationships within Caprifolieae, however, remain quite uncertain, and the monophyly of Lonicera, the most species-rich of the traditional genera, and its subdivisions, need to be evaluated. In this study we used sequences of the ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA and five chloroplast non-coding regions (rpoB–trnC spacer, atpB–rbcL spacer, trnS–trnG spacer, petN–psbM spacer, and psbM–trnD spacer) to address these problems. Our results indicate that Heptacodium is sister to Caprifolieae, Triosteum is sister to the remaining genera within the tribe, and Leycesteria and Symphoricarpos form a clade that is sister to a monophyletic Lonicera. Within Lonicera, the major split is between subgenus Caprifolium and subgenus Lonicera. Within subgenus Lonicera, sections Coeloxylosteum, Isoxylosteum, and Nintooa are nested within the paraphyletic section Isika. Section Nintooa may also be non-monophyletic.
  • 31762100213881.Pdf

    31762100213881.Pdf

    Wildlife use of fire-disturbed areas in sagebrush steppe on the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory by William Edward Moritz A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Fish and Wildlife Management Montana State University © Copyright by William Edward Moritz (1988) Abstract: From June, 1984 through June, 1987, a study was conducted on the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) in southeast Idaho to collect data on sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus), pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) and small mammal use of nine burned areas (fire s cars) of various ages in sagebrush steppe- Information on plant community composition of burned areas and adjacent nonburned (control) areas was reported. Fire scars were characterized by an absence of sagebrush, although revegetation was not clearly directional or predictable. Two years of seasonal use by sage grouse and pronghorn of fire scars and control areas were determined. Sage grouse use of a newly burned area was significantly greater (p<0.05) than controls. Fire scars dominated by cheatgras s (Bromus textorurn) were used by sage grouse significantly less than controls. Incomplete burns created a mosiac pattern of vegetation which sage grouse used significantly more than adjacent controls. Significant trends in use by sage grouse of older burned areas, dominated by perennial grasses/rabbitbrush (Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus) were not detected. The lush growth of grasses and forbs following disturbance attracted pronghorn, as use of the fire scar was significantly higher than controls. Pronghorn use of cheatgrass-dominated fire scars was significantly greater than controls. Overall use of incompletely-burned areas was not significantly different than controls, although seasonal- differences existed.