APPROVED PLANT LIST for JURISDICTIONAL PROJECTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CARLISLE CONSERVATION COMISSION - APPROVED PLANT LIST for JURISDICTIONAL PROJECTS UNDER FORESTED BANKS & WATER WETLAND DRIER WETLANDS WET, SUNNY WATER'S (>1' INDICATOR TYPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME UPLAND & SHADE MEADOWS EDGE DEEP) STATUS Deciduous Trees Acer rubrum Red Maple x x x x FAC Acer saccharinum Silver Maple x x x x FACW Benthamidia (Cornus) florida Flowering Dogwood x x x FACU Betula nigra River Birch x x x x FACW Betula papyrifera Paper Birch x FACU Hamamelis virginiana Witch-Hazel x x FAC- Nyssa sylvatica Sweet Gum x x x x FAC Quercus alba White Oak x x x FACU Quercus rubra Red Oak x x x FACU- Evergreen Trees Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar x x UPL Pinus strobus White Pine x x x FACU Tsuga canadensis Eastern Hemlock x x FACU Evergreen Shrubs Juniperus horizontalis Prostrate Juniper x x FACU Kalmia latifolia Mountain Laurel x x x FACU Shrubs Amelanchier canadensis ShadBush x x x FAC Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush x x x x x OBL Clethra alnifolia Sweet Pepper Bush x x x x x FAC+ Comptonia peregrina Sweet Fern x x UPL Corylus americana American Hazelnut x x x x FACU- Ilex verticillata Winterberry Holly x x x x FACW+ Lindera benzoin Spice Bush x x x FACW- Photinia (Aronia) arbutifolia Red Chokeberry x x FACW Photinia (Aronia) melanocarpa Black Chokeberry x x FAC Rhododendron viscosum Swamp Azalea x x x OBL Swida (Cornus) racemosa Grey Dogwood x x x x FAC Swida (Cornus) sericea Red Osier Dogwood x x x x FACW+ Vaccinium angustifolium Low Bush Blueberry x x x FACU- Vaccinium corymbosum High Bush Blueberry x x x x FACW Ferns Dennstaedtia punctilobula Hay Scented Fern x x x x UPL Matteuccia struthiopteris Ostrich Fern x x x FACW Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive Fern x x x FACW Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon Fern x x x FACW CARLISLE CONSERVATION COMISSION - APPROVED PLANT LIST for JURISDICTIONAL PROJECTS UNDER FORESTED BANKS & WATER WETLAND DRIER WETLANDS WET, SUNNY WATER'S (>1' INDICATOR TYPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME UPLAND & SHADE MEADOWS EDGE DEEP) STATUS Grasses & Sedges Carex appalachica Appalacian Sedge x x x UPL Carex pensylvanica Oak Sedge x x x UPL Carex stricta Tussock-sedge x x x x x OBL Panicum virgatum Switchgrass x x FAC Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem x x FACU- Groundcovers Gaultheria procumbens Wintergreen x x FACU Tiarella cordifolia Foam Flower x x FACU Perennials Aquilegia canadensis Wild Columbine x x x FACU Caltha palustris Marsh-marigold x x OBL Eurybia (Aster) divaricata White Wood Aster x x UPL Eutrochium (Eupatorium) maculatum Spotted Joe Pye Weed x x x x FACW Geranium maculatum Wild Geranium x x x FACU Lobelia cardinalis Cardinal Flower x x x x FACW+ **Plant Names in BOLD have been found in Carlisle during Wetland Delineation activities.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Blueberry Scorch Virus Identification
Blueberry Scorch Virus A BC Small-Scale Farmer’s IPM Guide- Guide series, March 2021 Blueberry scorch is an aphid-vectored virus that is spread through and between fields by winged aphids. Infected plants will generally become symptomatic the year after infection, and die within two to three years. Plants may appear healthy in the spring each year, but symptoms usually start to show during bloom. Different varieties manifest different symptoms, with Bluecrop having the least obvious symptoms. This manual contains integrated pest management (IPM) guidelines geared towards small-scale production, but they are applicable to any operation wanting to improve pest identification, monitoring and management. Identification Description of symptoms • Blossoms and leaves wilt and then turn brown/orange/black. • Stems around wilted areas initially remain green (contrary to bacterial stem blight), but some blueberry varieties will show dark stem blighting. • Some leaves will yellow around leaf margins. • Symptoms may only appear on one or two branches even though the whole bush is still infected with virus. • Some infected bushes may not show any of the wilting/blighting symptoms. They may only appear off- colour or have fewer flower clusters than neighbouring healthy bushes – this is more common in Bluecrop. Scorch vs shock virus • Visual scorch virus symptoms are almost identical to shock virus, which is vectored by pollen. A lab test is required to differentiate between these two viruses. • Scorch virus will eventually kill the plants, whereas plants will recover from shock virus. Blueberry Scorch Virus IPM Guide 1 The vector - aphids • Aphids can be many colours, including black, green, orange, and brown.
[Show full text]
Native Herbaceous Perennials and Ferns for Shade Gardens
Green Spring Gardens 4603 Green Spring Rd ● Alexandria ● VA 22312 Phone: 703-642-5173 ● TTY: 703-803-3354 www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/greenspring NATIVE HERBACEOUS PERENNIALS AND FERNS FOR � SHADE GARDENS IN THE WASHINGTON, D.C. AREA � Native plants are species that existed in Virginia before Jamestown, Virginia was founded in 1607. They are uniquely adapted to local conditions. Native plants provide food and shelter for a myriad of birds, butterflies, and other wildlife. Best of all, gardeners can feel the satisfaction of preserving a part of our natural heritage while enjoying the beauty of native plants in the garden. Hardy herbaceous perennials form little or no woody tissue and live for several years. Some of these plants are short-lived and may live only three years, such as wild columbine, while others can live for decades. They are a group of plants that gardeners are very passionate about because of their lovely foliage and flowers, as well as their wide variety of textures, forms, and heights. Most of these plants are deciduous and die back to the ground in the winter. Ferns, in contrast, have no flowers but grace our gardens with their beautiful foliage. Herbaceous perennials and ferns are a joy to garden with because they are easily moved to create new design combinations and provide an ever-changing scene in the garden. They are appropriate for a wide range of shade gardens, from more formal gardens to naturalistic woodland gardens. The following are useful definitions: Cultivar (cv.) – a cultivated variety designated by single quotes, such as ‘Autumn Bride’.
[Show full text]
Phytochemicals from the Roots of Northern Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium Corymbosum)
University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Open Access Master's Theses 2013 Phytochemicals from the Roots of Northern Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium Corymbosum) Amanda Cirello University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses Recommended Citation Cirello, Amanda, "Phytochemicals from the Roots of Northern Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium Corymbosum)" (2013). Open Access Master's Theses. Paper 716. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/theses/716 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYTOCHEMICALS FROM THE ROOTS OF NORTHERN HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY ( VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM ) BY AMANDA CIRELLO A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2013 MASTER OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES THESIS OF AMANDA CIRELLO APPROVED: Thesis Committee: Major Professor Navindra Seeram David Worthen Joanna Norris Clinton Chichester Nasser H. Zawia DEAN OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND 2013 ABSTRACT Growing evidence from many in vitro studies suggest that plants produce secondary metabolites which may have potential physiological properties. The northern highbush blueberry ( Vaccinium corymbosum L.) plant is commercially cultivated for its valuable dark-blue fruit, which has been extensively researched and has been shown to contain phenolic compounds recognized to have positive health benefits. Thus, an evaluation of other parts of the plant, that as of yet have not been investigated, could be worthwhile.
[Show full text]
Reduction of Diplycosia Indica (2009) to Gaultheria Akaensis (2006)
Panda, S., J.L. Reveal, and M. Sanjappa. 2012. Reduction of Diplycosia indica (2009) to Gaultheria akaensis (2006). Phytoneuron 2012-35: 1–7. Published 23 April 2012. ISSN 2153 733X REDUCTION OF DIPLYCOSIA INDICA (2009) TO GAULTHERIA AKAENSIS (2006) (ERICACEAE) SUBHASIS PANDA Taxonomy & Biosystematics Laboratory, Post-Graduate Department of Botany Darjeeling Government College, Darjeeling-734101 INDIA [email protected] JAMES L. REVEAL L.H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant Biology Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-4301 USA [email protected] MUNIVENKATAPPA SANJAPPA Former Director, Botanical Survey of India Presently at Botanical Garden, University of Agricultural Sciences GKVK, Bengaluru-560064 INDIA ABSTRACT Diplycosia indica M.R. Debta & H.J. Chowdhery is reduced to synonymy under Gaultheria akaensis Panda & Sanjappa due to a misinterpretation of immature floral features of the type material used by Debta and Chowdhery to establish their new species. KEY WORDS : nomenclature, synonymy, India, Singalelah National Park Diplycosia indica was described by Debta and Chowdhery (2009) based on two specimens collected by M.R. Debta in the Singalelah National Park area of the Darjeeling Himalaya. During the course of recent field studies (mid-December 2011) at different locations in Singalelah National Park as part of post-revisionary work in Indian Ericaceae, specimens of a species of Gaultheria L. were collected near Megma, Megma-Tonglu road and in the Kainyakata-Kalapokhri area on rocky slopes near adjacent road sides. The Gaultheria was identified as G. akaensis Panda & Sanjappa (2006), a critically endangered species then known only from Aka Hill in the Arunachal Himalaya. This expression of G. akaensis from the Singalelah National Park then proved to be identical to the type of D.
[Show full text]
Marilandica, Summer/Fall 2002
MARILANDICA Journal of the Maryland Native Plant Society Vol. 10, No. 2 Summer/Fall 2002 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Marilandica Journal of the Maryland Native Plant Society The Maryland Native Volume 10, Number 2 Summer/Fall 2002 Plant Society ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (MNPS) is a nonprofit organization that uses education, research, and Table of Contents community service to increase the awareness and appreciation of Native Woody Flora of Montgomery County native plants and their habitats, By John Mills Parrish leading to their conservation and Page 3 restoration. Membership is open to ~ all who are interested in Maryland’s MNPS Field Botany Updates native plants and their habitats, preserving Maryland’s natural By Rod Simmons, Cris Fleming, John Parrish, and Jake Hughes heritage, increasing their knowledge Page 8 of native plants, and helping to ~ further the Society’s mission. In Search of Another Orchid Species By Joseph F. Metzger, Jr. MNPS sponsors monthly meetings, Page 11 workshops, field trips, and an ~ annual fall conference. Just Boil the Seeds By James MacDonald Page 13 Maryland Native Plant Society ~ P.O. Box 4877 MNPS Contacts Silver Spring, MD 20914 www.mdflora.org Page 15 ~ Some Varieties of Andropogon virginicus and MNPS Executive Officers: Andropogon scoparius By M.L. Fernald, Rhodora, Vol. 37, 1935 Karyn Molines-President Page 16 Louis Aronica-Vice President Marc Imlay-Vice President Roderick Simmons-Vice President Jane Osburn-Secretary Jean Cantwell-Treasurer MNPS Board Of Directors: Carole Bergmann Blaine Eckberg Cris Fleming Jake Hughes Carol Jelich Dwight Johnson James MacDonald Joe Metzger, Jr. Lespedeza repens John Parrish Mary Pat Rowan Submissions for Marilandica are welcomed. Word documents are preferred but Louisa Thompson not necessary.
[Show full text]
Coptis Trifolia Conservation Assessment
CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT for Coptis trifolia (L.) Salisb. Originally issued as Management Recommendations December 1998 Marty Stein Reconfigured-January 2005 Tracy L. Fuentes USDA Forest Service Region 6 and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT FOR COPTIS TRIFOLIA Table of Contents Page List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 2 Summary........................................................................................................................................ 4 I. NATURAL HISTORY............................................................................................................. 6 A. Taxonomy and Nomenclature.......................................................................................... 6 B. Species Description ........................................................................................................... 6 1. Morphology ................................................................................................................... 6 2. Reproductive Biology.................................................................................................... 7 3. Ecological Roles ............................................................................................................. 7 C. Range and Sites
[Show full text]
Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List
Coastal Landscaping in Massachusetts Plant List This PDF document provides additional information to supplement the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) Coastal Landscaping website. The plants listed below are good choices for the rugged coastal conditions of Massachusetts. The Coastal Beach Plant List, Coastal Dune Plant List, and Coastal Bank Plant List give recommended species for each specified location (some species overlap because they thrive in various conditions). Photos and descriptions of selected species can be found on the following pages: • Grasses and Perennials • Shrubs and Groundcovers • Trees CZM recommends using native plants wherever possible. The vast majority of the plants listed below are native (which, for purposes of this fact sheet, means they occur naturally in eastern Massachusetts). Certain non-native species with specific coastal landscaping advantages that are not known to be invasive have also been listed. These plants are labeled “not native,” and their state or country of origin is provided. (See definitions for native plant species and non-native plant species at the end of this fact sheet.) Coastal Beach Plant List Plant List for Sheltered Intertidal Areas Sheltered intertidal areas (between the low-tide and high-tide line) of beach, marsh, and even rocky environments are home to particular plant species that can tolerate extreme fluctuations in water, salinity, and temperature. The following plants are appropriate for these conditions along the Massachusetts coast. Black Grass (Juncus gerardii) native Marsh Elder (Iva frutescens) native Saltmarsh Cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) native Saltmeadow Cordgrass (Spartina patens) native Sea Lavender (Limonium carolinianum or nashii) native Spike Grass (Distichlis spicata) native Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) native Plant List for a Dry Beach Dry beach areas are home to plants that can tolerate wind, wind-blown sand, salt spray, and regular interaction with waves and flood waters.
[Show full text]
Central Mixedgrass Prairie Ecological System (Central Shortgrass Prairie Ecoregion Version)
CENTRAL MIXEDGRASS PRAIRIE ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM (CENTRAL SHORTGRASS PRAIRIE ECOREGION VERSION) ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT Draft of June 29, 2007 Prepared by: Karin Decker Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 254 General Services Building Fort Collins, CO 80523 Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 A.1 Classification Summary ........................................................................................... 3 A.2 Ecological System Description ................................................................................ 5 A.2.1 Environment....................................................................................................... 5 A.2.2 Vegetation & Ecosystem.................................................................................... 6 A.2.3 Dynamics ........................................................................................................... 8 A.2.4 Landscape......................................................................................................... 10 A.2.5 Size................................................................................................................... 11 A.3 Ecological Integrity................................................................................................ 12 A.3.1 Threats.............................................................................................................. 12 A.3.2 Justification of Metrics....................................................................................
[Show full text]
State of New York City's Plants 2018
STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
[Show full text]
Salal Gaultheria Shallon
Mountain Loop Conservancy Fact Sheet: Salal Gaultheria shallon Range: Salal grows only in North America and ranges from southeastern Alaska south to central California and east through the western slopes of the coastal ranges and Cascade Mountains. Salal grows from sea level to an elevation of 2,500 feet (763 m). Identification: This shrub grows to a height of 1.3 to 10 feet (0.4 - 3 m). Its evergreen leaves are thick, leathery, and shiny. Leaves are a pointed egg shape and are 2 - 4 inches (5 – 10cm) long. The green leaves grow alternately off stems that are often reddish in color. The lantern- shaped flowers are white to pinkish in color and grow along the ends of stems in showy clusters of 5 -15. They bloom from May 15 – July 1. Salal has a “pseudo berry” that is actually fleshy flower sepals. The berries are 0.24 - 0.4 inch (6 - 10mm) in diameter and reddish-blue to dark purple in color. They are covered with tiny hairs. The fruit is edible and is ripe by August 15. The berries taste a little like huckleberries but they are sweeter and have a drier texture. Salal with berries. Photo by Angie Goodloe © Unique characteristics: This is one of the most common understory plant species in the Pacific Northwest. Salal varies widely in height depending on where they are growing. Their growth can be a low, scraggly form or a tall, almost impenetrable, thicket. Habitat: Salal grows in a wide variety of habitats from coastal dunes to montane forests. It can grow in dry to very wet sites and tolerates sun or shade.
[Show full text]
Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montana's Glaciated
Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains Final Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Prepared by: Stephen V. Cooper, Catherine Jean and Paul Hendricks December, 2001 Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains Final Report 2001 Montana Natural Heritage Program Montana State Library P.O. Box 201800 Helena, Montana 59620-1800 (406) 444-3009 BLM Agreement number 1422E930A960015 Task Order # 25 This document should be cited as: Cooper, S. V., C. Jean and P. Hendricks. 2001. Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains. Report to the Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Pro- gram, Helena. 24 pp. plus appendices. Executive Summary Throughout much of the Great Plains, grasslands limited number of Black-tailed Prairie Dog have been converted to agricultural production colonies that provide breeding sites for Burrow- and as a result, tall-grass prairie has been ing Owls. Swift Fox now reoccupies some reduced to mere fragments. While more intact, portions of the landscape following releases the loss of mid - and short- grass prairie has lead during the last decade in Canada. Great Plains to a significant reduction of prairie habitat Toad and Northern Leopard Frog, in decline important for grassland obligate species. During elsewhere, still occupy some wetlands and the last few decades, grassland nesting birds permanent streams. Additional surveys will have shown consistently steeper population likely reveal the presence of other vertebrate declines over a wider geographic area than any species, especially amphibians, reptiles, and other group of North American bird species small mammals, of conservation concern in (Knopf 1994), and this alarming trend has been Montana.
[Show full text]
Hydrastis Canadensis L.) in Pennsylvania: Explaining and Predicting Species Distribution in a Northern Edge of Range State
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/694802; this version posted July 8, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Title: Associated habitat and suitability modeling of goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis L.) in Pennsylvania: explaining and predicting species distribution in a northern edge of range state. *1Grady H. Zuiderveen, 1Xin Chen, 1,2Eric P. Burkhart, 1,3Douglas A. Miller 1Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 2Shavers Creek Environmental Center, 3400 Discovery Rd, Petersburg, PA 16669 3Department of Geography, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 *telephone: (616) 822-8685; email: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/694802; this version posted July 8, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Goldenseal (Hydrastis canadensis L.) is a well-known perennial herb indigenous to forested areas in eastern North America. Owing to conservation concerns including wild harvesting for medicinal markets, habitat loss and degradation, and an overall patchy and often inexplicable absence in many regions, there is a need to better understand habitat factors that help determine the presence and distribution of goldenseal populations. In this study, flora and edaphic factors associated with goldenseal populations throughout Pennsylvania—a state near the northern edge of its range—were documented and analyzed to identify habitat indicators and provide possible in situ stewardship and farming (especially forest-based farming) guidance.
[Show full text]