DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1 an Epigraphic Inventory of the Cults of Tetradic Thessaly

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 1 an Epigraphic Inventory of the Cults of Tetradic Thessaly APPENDIX 1 AN EPIGRAPHIC INVENTORY OF THE CULTS OF TETRADIC THESSALY This dissertation has attempted to illuminate what I have termed the regional stratum of Thessalian religion. As a point of contrast, it will be useful cast some light on the local and panhellenic strata of Thessalian religion. In the following pages, I offer a complete inventory of the cults of tetradic Thessaly, excepting the Imperial cult, as known from the region’s epigraphy. The inscriptions collected here belong to two basic types: 1) Dedications mentioning the name of a divinity; 2) Publication clauses in decrees. APHRODITE without epithet Atrax: SEG 47.678 = Rakatsanis and Tziaphalias 1997: 32 (IIa) Cierium: IG ix.2 271 (date?) Elateia: McD 662 = Giannopoulos 1933: 1, no. 2 (date?) Larisa: IG ix.2 571 (IIIa) Metropolis: IG ix.2 1231.25 (IIa) Phalara: IG ix.2 1359 (date?) Pherai: SEG 45.645 = Ed. pr. Miller 1974 (IVa) Aphrodite Pandemos Larisa: IG ix.2 572 (date?) Aphrodite Peitho Pharsalos: IG ix.2 236 = IThessEnip 67 (Va?) 278 279 APOLLO without epithet Atrax: SEG 35.504 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 200, no. 36 (IIa) Larisa: IG ix.2 569 (date?) SEG 29.535 = Gallis 1973-4: 582 (aet. Rom.) Ortha: SEG 42.529 = Intzesiloglou 1987 (300-250a) Apollo Agreus Atrax: SEG 35.491 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 197, no. 23 (200a) Mylae: IG ix.2 332 (IIIa) Apollo Aguiatas Pharsalos: IG ix.2 241 (date?) Apollo Aisonios Campus Dotius: IG ix.2 10981 (date?) Apollo Delphaios Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) Theotonium: IG ix.2 257 (Va) Apollo Etdomaios Atrax: SEG 35.492 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 197, no. 24 (IIa?) 1 Also attested at Gonnoi: SEG 35.570-1 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 208-9, nos. 70-1 (200-150a) 280 Apollo Gadenos (Tadenos?) Campus Dotius: IG ix.2 1076 (date?) Apollo Hekatombaios Metropolis: SEG 36.548 = Helly 1970a (IIIa) Apollo Kerdoios Larisa: IG ix.2 521 (init. IIIa) SEG 27.202 = Ed. pr. Gallis 1977 (220-210a) IG ix.2 517 (214a) McD 337 = Ed. pr. Béquignon 1935: 55-64 (IIa) SEG 35.594 = Ed. pr. Tziaphalias 1984b: 229-230, no. 121 (200-150a) IG ix.2 512 (171a?) SEG 35.665 B 36ff. = Ed. pr. Cabanes and Andréou 1985 (167-157/6a) IG ix.2 add. 205 I (145a) IG vii 4131 (post 146a) IG ix.2 637 (IIIa) Skotussa: SEG 43.311 = Ed. pr. Missailidou-Despotidou 1993 (197-185a) Apollo Leschaios Larisa: IG ix.2 1027 (450-425a) Apollo Leukatas Mopsion: IG ix.2 1059 (date?) 281 Apollo Lykeios Atrax: SEG 33.450 = Helly 1983b: 162 (IIa) Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) Apollo Mousagetes Larisa: SEG 47.746 = Rakatsanis and Tziaphalias 1997: 24 (IVa) Apollo Proernos Krannon: SEG 31.572 = Habicht 1981 (200a) Apollo Promantas Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) Apollo Pythios Larisa: IG ix.2 588 (date?) Helly 1970b (init. IIa) Apollo Tempeites Larisa: SEG 35.607 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 215-6, no. 94 (100a) ARTEMIS without epithet Atrax: SEG 34.480 = Tziaphalias 1984a: 195, no. 56 (IIIa) SEG 34.491 = Tziaphalias 1977 (300-250a) SEG 34.493 = Tziaphalias 1977 (200a) SEG 35.502 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 200, no. 34 (IIIa) 282 SEG 43.240 = Tziaphalias 1988: 277 (200-150a) SEG 49.602 = Tziaphalias 1996 (IIIa) Krannon: SEG 42.507 = Tziaphalias 1987 (100-50a) Trikke: IG ix.2 304 (date?) Mopsion: IG ix.2 1059 (date?) Pharsalos: IG ix.2 239 (date?) Pherai: SEG 34.572 = Kakavoyannis 1977 (300a) Artemis Akraia Trikke: IG ix.2 303 (date?) Artemis Chalkaeitis Larisa: SEG 29.536 = Gallis 1973-4: 581 (date?) Artemis Delphinia Gyrton: IG ix.2 1035 (date?) Artemis Eileithyia Larisa: SEG 45.616 = Tziaphalias 1989: 239 (IIIa) Artemis Ennodia Pherai: McD 232 = Béquignon 1937: 83, no. 27 (date?) Artemis Eukleia Pherai: IG ix.2 420 (date?) 283 Artemis Kerdoia Larisa: SEG 47.746 = Rakatsanis and Tziaphalias 1997: 28 (date?) Artemis Lochia Larisa: SEG 37.487 = Habicht 1987b: 314, no. 5 (IIIp) Artemis Ourania Mopseion: SEG 47.750 = Rakatsanis and Tziaphalias 1997: 28 (date?) Artemis (?) Phaesphoros, Phosphoros Mopsion: IG ix.2 1060 (II-Ia) IG ix.2 1061 (Ia) IG ix.2 1063 (I-IIp) Artemis in the Skia Pherai: IG ix.2 417 (date?) Artemis Soteira Atrax: SEG 47.675 = Tziaphalias 1993: 256, no. 38 (IIa) Artemis Stratia Atrax: SEG 45.555 = Rakatsanis and Tziaphalias 1997 (IIa) Artemis Throsia Atrax: SEG 35.500 = Ed. pr. Tziaphalias 1984b: 199, no. 32 (300-250a?) SEG 34.481 = Ed. pr. Tziaphalias 1984a: 481, no. 59 (ca. 150a) 284 Larisa: SEG 35.615 = Ed. pr. Tziaphalias 1984b: 206, no. 62 (date?) McD 360 = Ed. pr. Giannopoulos 1931: 178, no. 18 (med. IIa) ASKLEPIOS without epithet Atrax: SEG 47.672 = Rakatsanis and Tziaphalias 1997: 30-2 (date?) Gyrton: SEG 47.729 = Tziaphalias 1993: 258 (date?) Larisa: IG ix.2 570 (aet. Hell.) Mopseion: SEG 47.750 = Rakatsanis and Tziaphalias 1997: 30 (date?) Pharsalos: IG ix.2 240 (date?) Pherai: IG ix.2 416 (date?); McD 233 = Giannopoulos 1913: 218-9, no. C 2 (date?) Skotussa: IG ix.2 397 (date?) Asklepioi Crannon: SEG 43.280 = Tziaphalias 1988: 280-1 (IIIa) Hygeia Larisa: McD 409 = Giannopoulos 1933: 2, no. 5 (date?) ATARGATIS Parthenos Pherai: McD 237 = Béquignon 1937: 91, no. 64 (date?) Parthenos Bambukia Krannon: McD 316 = Ed. pr. Theocharis 1961-62: 179, no. 4 b (date?) 285 ATHENA without epithet Crannon: IG ix.2 460.7 (date?) Larisa: IG ix.2 517.45 (214a) Pherai: SEG 45.645 = Ed. pr. Miller 1974 (IVa) Athena Agoraia Atrax: SEG 27.184 = Gallis 1974: 277-81 (V-IVa) Athena Itonia Larisa: SEG 34.558 = Ed. pr. Gallis 1976: 176-8 (150-130a) Philia: SEG 25.653 18ff. = Habicht 1976b (179-165a) Athena Lageitarra Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) Athena Polias Argoura: McD 326 = Giannopoulos 1934-5 (VIa) Athena Patroia Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) Athena Thersys Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) 286 DEMETER without epithet Pherai: SEG 45.645 = Ed. pr. Miller 1974 (IVa) Demeter and Kore Atrax: SEG 35.506 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 201, no. 38 (200a) Demeter, Kore and Despote Larisa: McD 364 = Arvanitopoulos 1910: 377-8, no. 24 (aet. Rom.) Demeter and Monogone Trikke: IG ix.2 305 (aet. Hell.) Demeter Megalartos Pherai: IG ix.2 418 (date?) Demeter Phylaka and Dionysus Karpios Larisa: McD 346 = Ed. pr. Oikonomides and Koumanoudes 1956-7: 17-22, no. 1 (haud ante Ia) McD 361 = Ed. pr. Arvanitopoulos 1911: 123, no. 26 (Ia) IG ix.2 573 (aet. Imp.) Demeter Ploutea Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) 287 DIONYSUS without epithet Atrax: SEG 34.495 = Tziaphalias 1977 (150-100a) Larisa: IG ix.2 522 (fin. III-init. IIa) IG ix.2 574 (date?) SEG 26.677 = Giovannini 1976 (IIa) Pherai: SEG 39.507 = Intzesiloglou 1984 (IIIa) Dionysus and Nymphs Atrax: SEG 45.554 = Rakatsanis and Tziaphalias 1997: 69 (IIIa) Dionysus Karpios Gomphi: IG ix.2 287b (27-25a?) Larisa: SEG 35.590a = Kontogiannis 1985 (450-425a) Elateia (?): McD 653 = Ed. pr. Mastrokostas 1964: 318-9, n. 2 (Ia) Dionysus Karpios and Demeter Phylaka Larisa: McD 346 = Ed. pr. Oikonomides and Koumanoudes 1956-7: 17-22, no. 1 (haud ante Ia) McD 361 = Ed. pr. Arvanitopoulos 1911: 123, no. 26 (Ia) IG ix.2 573 (aet. Imp.) Macedonian Dionysus Larisa: SEG 27.206 = Gallis 1972 (aet. Aug.) 288 DIOSKOUROI Pherai: IG ix.2 419 (date?) SEG 34.563 (IIIa) = Ed. pr. Chrysostomou 1983: 97-8 (IIIa) McD 234 = Ed. pr. Giannopoulos 1930: 180, no. 3 (250a) McD 235 = Béquignon 1937: 91, no. 62 Larisa: SEG 35.605 = Ed. pr. Tziaphalias 1984b: 221, no. 100 (200a) EGYPTIAN GODS Harpocrates: Larisa: IG ix.2 588 (Ia) Isis and Sarapis: Atrax: SEG 29.503 = Gallis 1973-4: 583 (date?) Krannon: IG ix.2 465 (date?) Larisa: SEG 35.610 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 222, no. 102 (IIIa) Pherai: SEG 46.657 = Nikolaou 1991 (IIa) Isis, Serapis, Anubis: Pagasai: IG ix.2 360 (date?) Larisa: IG ix.2 590 (date?) Isis, Serapis, Anubis, Horos Larisa: IG ix.2 589 (IIa) Isis, Serapis, Anubis, Harpocrates Larisa: IG ix.2 pg. 122 C (date?) 289 ENNODIA without epithet Pherai: SEG 45.645 = Ed. pr. Miller 1974 (IVa) Chrysostomou 1998: 25, no. 1 (med. IIa) Chrysostomou 1998: 26-8, no. 1 (350-300a) Chrysostomou 1998: 28-33 (200-150a) Chrysostomou 1998: 33-4, no. 3 (150-100a) Béquignon 1937: 83, no. 27 (aet. Hell.) IG ix.2 421 (175-150a) Ennodia and Zeus Meilichios (?) Pherai: Chrysostomou 1998: 44 (IVa) Ennodia, Zeus Meilichios and Po[…] Larisa: IG ix.2 578 (ca. 145a) Ennodia Alexatis Larisa: IG ix.2 576 (300-250a) Ennodia Astika Larisa: IG ix.2 575 (450-425a) Ennodia Korilla Pherai: SEG 38.450 = Ed. pr. Intzesiloglou 1980: 272-3 (150-100a) 290 Ennodia Mykaika Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) Ennodia Patroa Pagasai: IG ix.2 358 (IV-IIa) Ennodia Stathmia Larisa: IG ix.2 577 (aet. Hell.) Ennodia Strogika Patroa Larisa: SEG 49.622 = Ed. pr. Tziaphalias 1996: 382, no. 1 (fin. Va-init. IIa) GE without epithet Larisa: SEG 29.533 = Gallis 1973-4: 582 (IVa) Ge Pantareta Phayttos: IG ix.2 491 (date?) HELIOS without epithet Pherai: McD 236 = Béquignon 1937: 89, no. 56 (date?) Helios Basileus and all the Theoi Patrooi and all the Theai Atrax: SEG 34.492 = Tziaphalias 1977 (100a) 291 HERA without epithet Larisa: Helly 1970b (init. IIa) Hera and Zeus Larisa: McD 365 = Giannopoulos 1931: 177, no. 13 (aet. Rom.?) HERAKLES Atrax: SEG 34.487 = Tziaphalias 1984a: 201, no. 69 (200a) SEG 35.498 = Tziaphalias 1984b: 199, no. 30 (200a) Cierium: IG ix.2 258.12 = IThessEnip 15 (168a) Larisa: IG ix.2 580 = Kontogiannis 1985: 116-21 (IVa) Pagasai: IG ix.2 359 (III-IIa) Pherai: SEG 34.564-5 = Kakavoyannis 1978 (200-150a) Skotussa: SEG 25.661 (500-450a) SEG 43.311 = Missailidou-Despotidou 1993 (197-185a) HERMES Hermes Bruchalios Pharsalos: IThessEnip 69 (med.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY
    ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY EDITED BY RICHARD J.A.TALBERT London and New York First published 1985 by Croom Helm Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 1985 Richard J.A.Talbert and contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Atlas of classical history. 1. History, Ancient—Maps I. Talbert, Richard J.A. 911.3 G3201.S2 ISBN 0-203-40535-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-71359-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-03463-9 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Also available CONTENTS Preface v Northern Greece, Macedonia and Thrace 32 Contributors vi The Eastern Aegean and the Asia Minor Equivalent Measurements vi Hinterland 33 Attica 34–5, 181 Maps: map and text page reference placed first, Classical Athens 35–6, 181 further reading reference second Roman Athens 35–6, 181 Halicarnassus 36, 181 The Mediterranean World: Physical 1 Miletus 37, 181 The Aegean in the Bronze Age 2–5, 179 Priene 37, 181 Troy 3, 179 Greek Sicily 38–9, 181 Knossos 3, 179 Syracuse 39, 181 Minoan Crete 4–5, 179 Akragas 40, 181 Mycenae 5, 179 Cyrene 40, 182 Mycenaean Greece 4–6, 179 Olympia 41, 182 Mainland Greece in the Homeric Poems 7–8, Greek Dialects c.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 1 of 2 by Karl Otfried Müller
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 1 of 2 by Karl Otfried Müller This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 1 of 2 Author: Karl Otfried Müller Release Date: September 17, 2010 [Ebook 33743] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIES OF THE DORIC RACE, VOL. 1 OF 2*** The History and Antiquities Of The Doric Race by Karl Otfried Müller Professor in the University of Göttingen Translated From the German by Henry Tufnell, Esq. And George Cornewall Lewis, Esq., A.M. Student of Christ Church. Second Edition, Revised. Vol. I London: John Murray, Albemarle Street. 1839. Contents Extract From The Translators' Preface To The First Edition.2 Advertisement To The Second Edition. .5 Introduction. .6 Book I. History Of The Doric Race, From The Earliest Times To The End Of The Peloponnesian War. 22 Chapter I. 22 Chapter II. 39 Chapter III. 50 Chapter IV. 70 Chapter V. 83 Chapter VI. 105 Chapter VII. 132 Chapter VIII. 163 Chapter IX. 181 Book II. Religion And Mythology Of The Dorians. 202 Chapter I. 202 Chapter II. 216 Chapter III. 244 Chapter IV. 261 Chapter V. 270 Chapter VI. 278 Chapter VII. 292 Chapter VIII. 302 Chapter IX.
    [Show full text]
  • HESIOD in OVID: the METAMORPHOSIS of the CATALOGUE of WOMEN a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Co
    HESIOD IN OVID: THE METAMORPHOSIS OF THE CATALOGUE OF WOMEN A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ioannis V. Ziogas February 2010 © 2010 Ioannis V. Ziogas HESIOD IN OVID: THE METAMORPHOSIS OF THE CATALOGUE OF WOMEN Ioannis V. Ziogas, Ph.D. Cornell University, 2010 The subject of my dissertation is Ovid's intertextual engagement with the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women (aka the Ehoiai). I examine the Hesiodic character of Ovid’s work, focusing mainly on the Metamorphoses and Heroides 16-17. The Metamorphoses begins with Chaos and moves on to the loves of the gods, reiterating the transition from the Theogony to the Catalogue. Divine passions for beautiful maidens constitute a recurring motif in the Metamorphoses, establishing the importance of the erotic element in Ovid’s hexameter poem and referring to the main topic of the Ehoiai (fr. 1.1-5 M-W). The first five books of Ovid’s epic follow the descendants of the river-god Inachus, beginning with Jupiter’s rape of Io and reaching forward to Perseus, and the stemma of the Inachids features prominently in the Hesiodic Catalogue (fr. 122-59 M-W). As a whole, the Metamorphoses delineates the genealogies of the major Greek tribes (Inachids, Thebans, Athenians), and includes the Trojans, the only non-Greek genealogies of the Catalogue, which were dealt with in the last part of Hesiod’s work. Ovid’s foray into the Hesiodic corpus gives us a new perspective to interpreting his aemulatio of Vergil.
    [Show full text]
  • Horse and Horsemen on Classical and Hellenistic Coins in Thessaly
    Horse and Horsemen on Classical and Hellenistic Coins in Thessaly Athanasios Papaioannou SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) in Classical Archaeology and Ancient History of Macedonia February 2019 Thessaloniki – Greece Student Name: Athanasios Papaioannou SID: 2204160011 Supervisor: Prof. Sophia Kremydi I hereby declare that the work submitted is mine and that where I have made use of another’s work, I have attributed the source(s) according to the Regulations set in the Student’s Handbook. February 2019 Thessaloniki - Greece 2 ABSTRACT This dissertation was written as part of the MA in Classical Archaeology and Ancient History of Macedonia at the International Hellenic University. The horse and horsemen are common and very popular depictions in all aspects of art either in Thessaly or Macedonia. In this way, the horse was a basic element in agricultural labor and an important means of transportation until the first decades of the 20th century. Furthermore, horses were used in warfare and played a crucial role in many battles in Antiquity. They were connected to several deities and to chthonic cults during the same period. Numismatics, on the other hand, is one of the most valuable tools of archaeologists and historians for carrying out the task of unraveling the past. Through the coin types we can trace the political messages which the issuing authorities wanted to diffuse to the local and foreign user of the currency as well as the cultural and sociopolitical background of their territory. The present paper deals with the horse types on the coinages of the Thessalian and Macedonian region.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Constellations Used for Navigation, VAMZ, 3.S., XXXIX 15–58 (2006) 15
    Color profile: Disabled Composite 150 lpi at 45 degrees T. BILI]: Northern constellations used for navigation, VAMZ, 3.s., XXXIX 15–58 (2006) 15 TOMISLAV BILI] Kosirnikova 83 Hr – 10000 Zagreb [email protected] SOME NORTHERN CONSTELLATIONS USED FOR NAVIGATION IN ANTIQUITY UDK 52 : 94(3) : 656 (37/38) Izvorni znanstveni rad The text analyses the myth of Arion the citharode and his miraculous deliverance. It is believed that the background of this myth is actually the use of stars from the constellation Delphinus in celestial navigation by ancient sea-farers on the maritime route from Magna Graecia to Greece. The author further analyses the myth of Apollo Delphinius, according to which the god assumed the shape of a dolphin and thus guided a Cretan ship to Delphi. Further he considers the use of stars from the constellation Corona Borealis in celestial navigation; in this context he shortly addresses Theseus’ voyage to Crete and interprets it as an expedition to the Otherworld. Next, the author tries to reconstruct the foundation-myth of Tarentum based on Classical sources, in the context of Arion’s dolphin-assisted voyage. Associated with this is the analysis of stories with the eponym-hero of the city, Taras, and Phalanthus the Spartan as the main protagonists. The article briefly mentions some other »dolphin-riders« from Anti- quity, namely Melicertes and Hermias. The final section discusses foundation-myths of Greek colonies in the Bay of Naples, again in the context of celestial navigation and open-sea voyages. THE MYTH OF ARION It is possibile that the famous myth of Arion the citharode is part of the tradition related to open-sea latitude sailing between Magna Graecia and the Peloponnese.
    [Show full text]
  • SNG-Copenhagen Volume 1 ITALY – SICILY | TABLE of CONTENTS Part 1: Italy 1: Etruria-Campania
    SNG-Copenhagen Volume 1 ITALY – SICILY | TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1: Italy 1: Etruria-Campania. 1942 Part 2: Italy 2: Apulia-Lucania (Metapontum). 1942. Part 3: Italy 3: Lucania (Poseidonia)-Bruttium. 1942. Part 4: Sicily 1: Abacaenum-Petra. 1942. Part 5: Sicily 2: Segesta-Sardinia. 1942. Mint City Plate # Coin # Mint City Plate # Coin # Mint City Plate # Coin # ITALY Apulia SICILY Etruria Arpi ............................. 15 ............ 600-613 Abacaenum ................. 1 ...................... 1-8 Populonia .................... 1 ...................... 1-7 Asculum ...................... 15 ............ 614-616 Acrae .......................... 1 ......................... 9 Populonia-Vetulonia-Camars? ................ 8 Azetum ....................... 15 ............ 617-621 Adranum ..................... 1 .................. 10-12 Vetulonia .................... 1 .................... 9-10 Barium ........................ 15 ............ 622-625 Aetna .......................... 1 .................. 13-19 Peithesa ....................... 1 .................. 11-16 Butuntum .................... 15 ............ 626-628 Agrigentum (Acragas) 1-3............. 20-125 Cosa (Volcentium) ...... 1 ....................... 17 Caelia .......................... 15 ............ 629-641 Agyrium ..................... 3 .............. 126-131 Canusium .................... 15 ............ 642-645 Volaterrae ................... 1 .................. 18-25 Alaesa ......................... 3 .............. 132-141 Hyrium ........................ 15 ...........
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-03-25 Thessaly Ancient Coins.Htm
    Guide to Ancient Greek Coins of Thessaly Central Greece List of the cities in Thessaly which issued coins in ancient times and a collection of coins from the area https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rjIAgU3coI The goal of this guide is to share the information about the types of ancient Greek coins that were struck by the Greek towns of the area in central Greece known as Thessaly. With the list you can see below, you can use to search my store by clicking on the term, or printed out as a check-list to help you put together a coin collection from the area. With the video and the list of coins along with pictures and descriptions of them, you too, can become an expert in these types of coins. Some of the cities just issued bronze coins, others issued gold silver and bronze types. The most comprehensive book on the subject is Handbook of Ancient Greek Coins Volume 4 by Oliver D. Hoover. The other book to get is the Volume I and Volume II of Ancient Greek Coins and Their Values by David R. Sear. You can also see pictures and descriptions of coins from Thessaly for research purposes at this research site, by scrolling to the section on Thessaly with much information about the coin types. The most prominent town of ancient Thessaly was Larissa, which minted some of the most prolific coin types of that area. Many of the city's coins featured a nymph and a horse. Many of the coins of ancient Thessaly featured horses.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Phantom Eleans' in Southern Epirus *
    doi: 10.2143/AWE.14.0.3108190 AWE 14 (2015) 111-143 ‘PHANTOM ELEANS’ IN SOUTHERN EPIRUS * ADOLFO J. DOMÍNGUEZ Abstract The existence of a series of Elean colonies in the region of Cassopaea, in southern Epirus, has been regularly accepted by scholars on the basis of a single piece of written evidence. Despite such limited information, a number of interpretations have been made in an attempt to date the foundation of these colonies, and even to describe their political and institutional development. In this article, I examine the available archaeological evidence for those sites usually identified with these alleged colonies in order to show that there is no proof of colonial occupation or of any urban entities before the middle of the 4th century. Likewise, I attempt to explain how the idea of Elean colonisation may have sprung up, and why only a single reference points to it. Elean Colonies in Southern Epirus? A Consideration of the Evidence It is a known fact that not all Greek territories were involved with equal intensity in the process we know today as ‘Greek colonisation’. Whereas some cities became famous for having founded tens of cities (for example, Miletus with over 90 colonies),1 other regions do not appear to have founded any at all. Aside from the recent debates on the question of ‘Greek colonisation’,2 here I would like to focus on a particularly singular case, for which there is practically only a single refer- ence, namely the colonisation by the Eleans, the inhabitants of Elis, in the north- western Peloponnese.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 the Thessalian Calendar
    CHAPTER 3 THE THESSALIAN CALENDAR This chapter assesses the contribution of the Thessalian calendar to an understanding of Thessalian religion.1 It is well recognized that ancient Greek month names were almost always based on the name of a festival that took place during that month. That there is a relationship between epichoric calendars and epichoric religious traditions is therefore clear: 2 It remains to assess the nature of this relationship. In section 1, I consider the Athenian calendar as a case study. Since knowledge of Attic cults and the Attic calendar far surpasses our knowledge of the cults and calendar of any other region in the ancient Greek world, we can examine how the two bodies of knowledge relate to one another. In so doing, it may be possible to glimpse the potential contributions of a study of epichoric calendars to the history of epichoric religion for, beyond Attica, it is more often than not the case that knowledge of a particular region’s calendar exceeds our knowledge of that region’s cults. In section 2, 1 Local calendars were an object of scholarly pursuit and implicated in broader inquiries concerning cult from a relatively early date. Philochorus (ca. 340-263/2a) wrote a Peri\ e(ortw=n, extremely fragmentary, in which he dated major Attic festivals by month and day (FGrHist 328 F 83-4). Callimachus wrote a Mhnw=n proshgori/ai kata\ e)/qnoj kai\ po/leij (p. 339 Pf.). Unfortunately nothing survives of this work. More important for our purposes is the work of Lysimachides (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Federal Sanctuaries
    CHAPTER 4 FEDERAL SANCTUARIES Introduction Every collective in Greek antiquity had a religious dimension. The identity of groups as diverse in size, function and orientation as the Delphian Labyads, Athenian Boule and the Delian League was expressed at some level through cult. Federal leagues were no different. In this chapter, I consider the two major federal sanctuaries of Thessaly, those of Athena Itonia at Philia and Zeus Eleutherios at Larissa, together with the cult conducted therein.1 I designate as federal sanctuaries those sanctuaries which received some form of symbolic or material investment by a koinon or related federal structure. The investment could take forms as diverse as the publication of league documents in a particular sanctuary or federal sponsorship of a religious festival. There is a temporal dimension to this investment, however: I am most concerned with those sanctuaries that show evidence of repeated investment through time. These sanctuaries need not be “capitols” in any modern sense,2 nor should they be freighted with the symbolism of the Archaic ethnos.3 They were, quite simply, cult places where federal identity was expressed.4 In theory, any sanctuary could become, i.e., could be constructed as, a federal sanctuary: In practice, very few did. 1 I also consider the substantial evidence that the sanctuary of Athena Itonia at Iton was federal. In Chapter 5, I will discuss the possibility that the sanctuary of Ennodia at Pherai was federal. 2 For a useful discussion of the problem of the federal capitol, cf. Mackil 2003: 134-8. 3 Cf. Morgan 2003: passim.
    [Show full text]
  • (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography. Barbarians in Strabo's
    Ghent University Faculty of Arts and Philosophy The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography. Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Isseans - Zygi). With a case-study: the Britons. Promotor: Paper submitted in partial Prof. M. Janse fulfilment of the requirements Co-promotors: for the degree of Prof. Brian D. Joseph (Ohio State University) “Master in de taal- en letterkunde: Dr. Christopher Brown (Ohio State University) Grieks- Latijn” by Anke De Naegel 2014-2015 2 Nederlandse samenvatting In deze thesis wordt eerst een inleiding gegeven die meer informatie geeft over het Herodotos project. Deze inleiding is samen geschreven met Julie Boeten. In deze inleiding komt naar voren wat dit project juist is en wat ons aandeel daarin was, dat is: we hebben alle volkeren die in Strabo’s Geografie voorkomen in tweeën gedeeld en alle informatie die Strabo over ons deel van deze volkeren schrijft verzameld. Deze informatie is terug te vinden achteraan deze thesis in de appendix. Het eerste deel van deze masterproef bestaat uit een casestudy. Op dezelfde manier waarop we de volkeren van Strabo behandeld hebben, bekeken we ons studieobject. Bij mij is het onderwerp van deze casestudy ‘the Britons’, dit zijn de oorspronkelijke inwoners van Groot-Brittannië. Aangezien het om een casestudy gaat hebben we alle teksten van de schrijvers uit de antieke oudheid bekeken waarin ons gekozen volk aan bod kwam. De nomenclatuur van het eiland en de bewoners wordt onderzocht. Blijkbaar was de naam van het eiland afgeleid van de naam van het volk. Men denkt dat beide namen afkomstig zijn uit de taal die de inwoners van Groot-Brittannië toen spraken, namelijk het Brittonic.
    [Show full text]