DOCSLIB.ORG

Map 55 Thessalia-Boeotia Compiled by J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Map 55 Thessalia-Boeotia Compiled by J. Fossey and J. Morin, 1995 with the assistance of G. Reger (islands) Introduction Most of the mainland surface area represented on the map has been the subject of detailed topographic publications over the past forty years. The last fifteen years have been especially productive; in fact, only one part of Thessalia is not covered at all by recent investigation, the area of Achaea Phthiotis north of Mt. Othrys. Such copious publication has proved a challenge, insofar as no map at this scale could hope to reflect fully the entire settlement pattern revealed by the latest surveys and remain comprehensible. Nor could it show most of the fortifications which dot the landscape around every ancient Greek community, large or small. Filling in ‘empty’ areas (the mountainous hinterland of Aetolia and the Pindus range, for example) with modern toponyms has also been deliberately avoided in order to maintain the map’s consistency. What appears here, therefore, is limited chiefly to those sites mentioned in ancient sources, whose locations are known; to these have been added a limited number of sites to which only a modern name can be attached. The coastline shown corresponds for the most part to the modern one. Lack of information from specific studies makes it impossible to mark many acknowledged changes (at the mouth of the R. Peneios, for example). This caution does not apply, however, to the coastal area of Thermopylae now located far inland because of the massive accumulation of alluvium from the R. Spercheios; here the ancient coastline has been the subject of a recent, detailed investigation (Kase 1991). The mouth of the R. Euenos (in Aetolia) poses a particular problem. The coastline shown there is very hypothetical because no accurate information is available; the absence of sites in this delta is a reasonable reflection of the situation in antiquity, but no coastline can be drawn with any confidence. Since the end of the nineteenth century, central Greece has seen drainage operations on several bodies of water (the Copais, Xynias and Boibe lakes, as well as a few smaller ones) and areas subject to flooding, especially in Thessalia. In general, the shorelines shown are those of the lakes in the nineteenth century, except where recent data are available, as in the cases of Lake Copais (Knauss 1990) for example, and the plain of Thisbe (Knauss 1992). The eastern shoreline of Lake Copais can be determined with a fair degree of certainty because of the encircling hills; but the more level nature of the ground along its western side, combined with the considerable regular variation of the lake’s level (both seasonal and annual fluctuation), precludes such confidence there and calls for approximate linework only. In the case of the marshy plain of Thisbe, the map represents the situation as Pausanias (9.32.2) describes it, with one half of the surface area covered by water, the other half drained. There is some degree of uncertainty about the northern extremity of Lake Boibe, which was marshy in antiquity and no doubt also subject to wide-ranging variations. Mycenaean drainage works have been omitted throughout, since they lie outside the chronological limits of the map. Roads are omitted deliberately. Information on them is either too scrappy or too general in nature to warrant marking road courses. In fact “roads” in Greece were typically pathways following the lie of the land, not constructed features at all (except in those rare instances where they were, say, cut into a rock face). The paucity of remains makes marking them with any confidence virtually impossible. Islands The choice of sites marked is consciously limited to the more significant; in particular, some towers reported for certain islands are omitted. Those on Peparethus are included in view of the argument that they form a system for defensive or refuge purposes (Fredrich 1906). Clearly, further work on many islands (Euboea in particular) would improve our knowledge as well as reveal more sites; Bruneau’s (1987) survey is instructive in this regard. MAP 55 THESSALIA-BOEOTIA 819 Directory All place names are in Greece Abbreviations KvA E. Curtius, J.A. Kaupert and A. Milchhöfer, Karten von Attika, Text, I-IX, Berlin, 1881-1900 TIB Hellas J. Koder and F. Hild, Tabula Imperii Byzantini 1, Hellas und Thessalien, DenkWien 125, Vienna, 1976 Names Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference D3 Abai ACHR Palaiokhori Exarkhou Fossey 1986, 78-81; NPauly F3 Abantes A NPauly B4 Achaea See Map 58 C2 Achaea Phthiotis RE Phthia 2, col. 957 F4 Acharnai See Map 59 C3 Acheloos fl. Xerias Kase 1991, 79-80 A2 Achelous fl. See Map 54 H3 Achilleion Sinus Achili RE Skyros 2, col. 690 E1 Aegaeum Mare See Map 57 A3 Aetolia ACHR Aitolia Bommeljé 1987; NPauly Aitoloi, Aitolia E2 Ag. Athanasios C?H? on Skiathos Fredrich 1906, 104 C3 Ag. Demetrios CHRL Kase 1991, 49 F3 Ag. Ilias AC Psakhna Sackett 1966.30-31; Bakhuizen 1985, 134-35 F3 Ag. Paraskevi ACHR Sackett 1966.33; Bakhuizen 1985, 135 F3 Ag. Triada CHRL Kriezoti Sackett 1966, 66; Bakhuizen 1985, 134 B3 Ag. Vasileios C?H W Sidira Bommeljé 1987, 105 E3 Ag. Vasileios CH? Sackett 1966, 44-45 A3 Agrinion CHR Vrakhori PECS; Bommeljé 1987, 96; Lauffer 1989, 80-81; NPauly E2 Aianteion Pr. RE E3 Aidepsos AC Lipso Gregory 1979 E3 Aidepsos CHRL Loutra Aidepsou PECS; TIB Hellas 118; Gregory 1979; NPauly F3 Aigai ACHRL Politika Kafkala (contra Sackett 1966.26; Knoepfler 1997, 406 Bakhuizen 1985, (n. 11) 125-27, 134) E3 Aigai M. Mt. Kandili Bakhuizen 1985, 124-27 G4 Aigilia? Ins. C Styra, between Euboea RE 2; Hakkert, Lex. 3 Aigilia Euboeai 1 and Attika A1 Aiginion See Map 54 C4 Aigion See Map 58 C4 Aigition CH Strouza Bommeljé 1987, 75; NPauly F4 Aiglepheira CHR Ag. Nikolaos Knoepfler 1997, 366 E4 Aigosthena See Map 58 C3 Ainis ACHR Kase 1991, 82-83; NPauly Ainianes § Ainianes D4 Aiolidai? CH Bania Hakkert, Lex. 3 D2 Aison? CH Dimini NPauly 3 F4 Aithalidai/ See Map 59 Hybadai A3 Akrai? CH Lithovouni / Ano Botinou Bommeljé 1987, 93; SAGT 6, 134-35 Akropolis B3 Akrai? HL Akropolis / Pappadates SAGT 6, 135-36 E4 Akraiphiai ACHRL Karditsa TIB Hellas 182; Fossey 1988, 265-71; NPauly C3 Akyphas/ ACHRL Pyrgos Rousset 1989, 214-17, 219-20; NPauly Pindos 820 MAP 55 THESSALIA-BOEOTIA Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference E4 Alalkomenai CHR Solinarion Fossey 1988, 332-35; NPauly Alkyonis Sinus = (H)Alkyonis Sinus D3 Alope ACH Melidoni / Ag. Aikaterini RE 2; Fossey 1990, 91-93 C4 Alope? CHR Makrini / Kokovista RE 3; Kirsten 1958, 669 (no. 62); Bommeljé 1987, 94 §*Alpa? RE Suppl. 3 Alpenos D3 Alope? ACHRL Rakhes / Phourni RE 1; Philippson 1950, 205 D3 Alpenos ACHRL Kolonos SAGT 4, 159-62; NPauly §Alpenoi F4 Amarynthos See Map 59 D4 Ambrossos ACHRL Distomon Fossey 1986, 30-31 §Ambryssos D2 Amphanai? ACH Soros Lauffer 1989, 106-07; NPauly F4 Amphiareion CHRL? Mavrodilesi Fossey 1988, 36-37 D3 Amphikleia ACHRL Dadi / Nekrotapheio / Dasios 1992, 32-33 (no. 12); TIB Hellas § Amphikaia Paliopyrgos 122; Leekley 1980, 119; Lauffer 1989, 108-09; NPauly Amphikaia C3 Amphissa ACHRL Salona Lerat 1952, 174-80; Lauffer 1989, 110-111; NPauly D1 Amyros AC Palaiokastro / Gerakari Philippson 1950, 131; Gallis 1973, 329-32; B. Helly F4 Anakaia? See Map 59 E3 Anastasis ACHRL Kyparisi / Gardinitsa Fossey 1990, 62-65 D2 Anaurosfl. EIolkos RE1 E3 Anchoe CHRL Bazaraki Fossey 1990, 27-32 C2 Angeia CHR Loutropigi (Smokovo) Helly 1992, 64-75; NPauly C2 Ano Ktimeni CH Ano Dranista Helly 1992, 49-58 C3 Ano Phteri C?HR? Hellenika Béquignon 1937, 315; Philippson 1950, 244 E4 Anthedon ACHRL Loukisia Fossey 1988, 252-57; NPauly D3 Anthela CHR Anthili RE Suppl. 3 Anthele; PECS Thermopylai; Kase 1991, 105-06; Lauffer 1989, 119 C3 Antikyra? ACHR in Malis, W Ag. Theodori Béquignon 1937, 305-306; / Kostalexi Kase 1991, 77-78; NPauly 1 D4 Antikyra ACHRL Kastro tou Stenou in Fossey 1986, 23-24; NPauly 2 Phocis B4 Antirrhion Pr. Bommeljé 1987, 77 D3 Antron(es) A?CHR Glypha / Akhilleion NPauly E2 Aphetai? ACHR Platania / Kato Yeoryios Müller 1987, 305-08 B3 Aphrodite Phystiou, T. ACH Kyron-Neron / Ag. Triada Bommeljé 1987, 91; Antonetti 1990, 230-35 C2 Apidanos fl. Pharsalitis TIB Hellas 124; NPauly D1 Apollo, T. CHR Tempe, Ag. Paraskevi Helly 1973, 34 E2 Apollo, T. ACHR Korope PECS; Leekley 1980, 142 E4 Apollo, T. ACHRL? Perdikovrysi Fossey 1988, 271-73 F3 Apollo, T. CH Steni Leekley 1980, 71-72; Bakhuizen 1985, 129, 134 G3 Apollo, T. ACHRL Avlonari / Itea Sackett 1966.74; Knoepfler 1997, 359, 375-76 C4 Apollo Nasiotas, T. CH Apsiphia Is. Lerat 1952, 205 E3 Apollo Tegyraios, T. ACH Magoula Pyrgou Fossey 1988, 368-72 D4 Apollo Thourios, T. HR S Isoma Camp 1992, 453-54 A4 Arakynthos M. Zygos RE 1 D4 Archegetes, T. ACHR Kato Tseresi / Marmaria / Fossey 1986, 57-58; Dasios 1992, 57 Kastrouli (no. 59); McInerney 1997 B2 Argithea CHR Hellenika / Knisovo Hammond 1967, 252-53; ArchDelt 37 (1982) 231 C1 Argoura ACHR Gremnos Magoula Francke 1955; PECS Argura; § Argissa Leekley 1980, 139; Knoepfler 1983 F4 Argoura CHR Lefkandi? Bakhuizen 1985, 132-33; §Argyra Knoepfler 1997, 353 G4 Arkhampolis CHR Sackett 1966, 77, 109-10; SAGT 2, 22 D2 Armenion ACHRL Petra Helly 1995, 86; NPauly § Ormenion? MAP 55 THESSALIA-BOEOTIA 821 Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference D4 Arne HRL? Magoula Balomenou Fossey 1988, 382-83; NPauly 1 D4 Artemis Diktynnaia, T. CHR Stavrou Dasios 1992, 73 (no. 93) D3 Artemis Elaphebolia, T. ACHR Kalapodi / Ag. Apostoloi Felsch 1987 B3 Artemis Hegemone, T.
Recommended publications
  • HOMERIC-ILIAD.Pdf

    HOMERIC-ILIAD.Pdf

    Homeric Iliad Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power Contents Rhapsody 1 Rhapsody 2 Rhapsody 3 Rhapsody 4 Rhapsody 5 Rhapsody 6 Rhapsody 7 Rhapsody 8 Rhapsody 9 Rhapsody 10 Rhapsody 11 Rhapsody 12 Rhapsody 13 Rhapsody 14 Rhapsody 15 Rhapsody 16 Rhapsody 17 Rhapsody 18 Rhapsody 19 Rhapsody 20 Rhapsody 21 Rhapsody 22 Rhapsody 23 Rhapsody 24 Homeric Iliad Rhapsody 1 Translated by Samuel Butler Revised by Soo-Young Kim, Kelly McCray, Gregory Nagy, and Timothy Power [1] Anger [mēnis], goddess, sing it, of Achilles, son of Peleus— 2 disastrous [oulomenē] anger that made countless pains [algea] for the Achaeans, 3 and many steadfast lives [psūkhai] it drove down to Hādēs, 4 heroes’ lives, but their bodies it made prizes for dogs [5] and for all birds, and the Will of Zeus was reaching its fulfillment [telos]— 6 sing starting from the point where the two—I now see it—first had a falling out, engaging in strife [eris], 7 I mean, [Agamemnon] the son of Atreus, lord of men, and radiant Achilles. 8 So, which one of the gods was it who impelled the two to fight with each other in strife [eris]? 9 It was [Apollo] the son of Leto and of Zeus. For he [= Apollo], infuriated at the king [= Agamemnon], [10] caused an evil disease to arise throughout the mass of warriors, and the people were getting destroyed, because the son of Atreus had dishonored Khrysēs his priest. Now Khrysēs had come to the ships of the Achaeans to free his daughter, and had brought with him a great ransom [apoina]: moreover he bore in his hand the scepter of Apollo wreathed with a suppliant’s wreath [15] and he besought the Achaeans, but most of all the two sons of Atreus, who were their chiefs.
  • The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts

    The Nature of Hellenistic Domestic Sculpture in Its Cultural and Spatial Contexts

    THE NATURE OF HELLENISTIC DOMESTIC SCULPTURE IN ITS CULTURAL AND SPATIAL CONTEXTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Craig I. Hardiman, B.Comm., B.A., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Mark D. Fullerton, Advisor Dr. Timothy J. McNiven _______________________________ Advisor Dr. Stephen V. Tracy Graduate Program in the History of Art Copyright by Craig I. Hardiman 2005 ABSTRACT This dissertation marks the first synthetic and contextual analysis of domestic sculpture for the whole of the Hellenistic period (323 BCE – 31 BCE). Prior to this study, Hellenistic domestic sculpture had been examined from a broadly literary perspective or had been the focus of smaller regional or site-specific studies. Rather than taking any one approach, this dissertation examines both the literary testimonia and the material record in order to develop as full a picture as possible for the location, function and meaning(s) of these pieces. The study begins with a reconsideration of the literary evidence. The testimonia deal chiefly with the residences of the Hellenistic kings and their conspicuous displays of wealth in the most public rooms in the home, namely courtyards and dining rooms. Following this, the material evidence from the Greek mainland and Asia Minor is considered. The general evidence supports the literary testimonia’s location for these sculptures. In addition, several individual examples offer insights into the sophistication of domestic decorative programs among the Greeks, something usually associated with the Romans.
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration

    Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration

    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
  • Kynomartyrion)

    Kynomartyrion)

    DOG SACRIFICE IN ANCIENT AND MODERN GREECE: FROM THE SACRIFICE RITUAL TO DOG TORTURE (KYNOMARTYRION) Manolis G. Sergis Abstract: The article presents and discusses the custom of kynomartyrion (dog torture) which took place in the Greek lands until the 1980s. In many areas it stopped in the 1930s because of its cruelty. The author begins his discussion with the presentation of some elements that are related to the dog. More spe- cifically, the dog is an animal that entered the humanized environment long ago and belongs to the creatures whose nature is twofold because it is part of the human and the non-human worlds and it has been treated as twofold by at least the Indo-Europeans. It is also maintained that the liminal Hellenistic period was decisive for the formation of folk worship because of the religious syncre- tism and the invasion of demons that dominated in the Eastern Mediterranean. The author points out its remarkable similarities to ancient Greek and Roman (and Indo-European) fertile, cathartic and other sacrificial practices. Due to industrialization of agriculture and rationalization of the magical way of thought of the “traditional” peasant, performance of the custom was transformed into a folkloric, spectacular one with intensely violent and sadistic behaviour on the part of humans in the places where it still took place after 1960. The writer argues that violence was always an inherent characteristic of the custom. None- theless, the archaic, and later folk thinking ritualized the performance and attributed to it a different facet, devoid of any sacred elements, during the 20th century where its inherent violence was manifested in its raw essence.
  • Anacreontic Or Dionysian?

    Anacreontic Or Dionysian?

    ANACREONTIC OR DIONYSIAN?: ETHNIC AND GENDER AMBIGUITY ON THE ANACREONTIC VASES A Thesis submined to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of z o r t the requirements for 5 the Degree Master of Arts In Classics by Stephanie Danielle Polos San Francisco, California May 2019 Copyright by Stephanie Danielle Polos 2019 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read ANACREONTIC OR DIONYSIAN?: ETHNIC AND GENDER AMBIGUITY ON THE ANACREONTIC VASES by Stephanie Danielle Polos, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Classics at San Francisco State University. Associate Professor, Classics David Smith, Ph.D. Professor, Classics ANACREONTIC OR DIONYSIAN?: ETHNIC AND GENDER AMBIGUITY ON THE ANACREONTIC VASES Stephanie Danielle Polos San Francisco, California 2 0 1 9 This thesis is an investigation of the “Anacreontic” vases, produced in late-sixth and early-fifth century Athens, with a particular focus on their iconography, background, and whether the men depicted on them are dressing in Eastern or feminine costume. However, the themes of gender and ethnic ambiguity, which are the primary feature of the vases, extends more deeply. I look at the context of the vases particularly related contemporary iconography, aspects of the Greek symposium, and traditions surrounding Dionysus and his cult in order to trace a broader theme of “Anacreontism,” and I conclude that the debate of “Eastern” vs. “feminine” regarding the Anacreontic vases disregards a more complex background for these vases and their iconography.
  • Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology

    Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology

    The Ruins of Paradise: Studies in Early Mediterranean Poetics and Cosmology by Matthew M. Newman A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Richard Janko, Chair Professor Sara L. Ahbel-Rappe Professor Gary M. Beckman Associate Professor Benjamin W. Fortson Professor Ruth S. Scodel Bind us in time, O Seasons clear, and awe. O minstrel galleons of Carib fire, Bequeath us to no earthly shore until Is answered in the vortex of our grave The seal’s wide spindrift gaze toward paradise. (from Hart Crane’s Voyages, II) For Mom and Dad ii Acknowledgments I fear that what follows this preface will appear quite like one of the disorderly monsters it investigates. But should you find anything in this work compelling on account of its being lucid, know that I am not responsible. Not long ago, you see, I was brought up on charges of obscurantisme, although the only “terroristic” aspects of it were self- directed—“Vous avez mal compris; vous êtes idiot.”1 But I’ve been rehabilitated, or perhaps, like Aphrodite in Iliad 5 (if you buy my reading), habilitated for the first time, to the joys of clearer prose. My committee is responsible for this, especially my chair Richard Janko and he who first intervened, Benjamin Fortson. I thank them. If something in here should appear refined, again this is likely owing to the good taste of my committee. And if something should appear peculiarly sensitive, empathic even, then it was the humanity of my committee that enabled, or at least amplified, this, too.
  • The Military Policy of the Hellenistic Boiotian League

    The Military Policy of the Hellenistic Boiotian League

    The Military Policy of the Hellenistic Boiotian League Ruben Post Department of History and Classical Studies McGill University, Montreal December, 2012 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree Master of Arts ©Ruben Post, 2012. Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 3 Abrégé ............................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 7 Sources .........................................................................................................................11 Chapter One .....................................................................................................................16 Agriculture and Population in Late Classical and Hellenistic Boiotia .........................16 The Fortification Building Program of Epameinondas ................................................31 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................43 Chapter Two ....................................................................................................................48
  • Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 (EBGR 2009)

    Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 (EBGR 2009)

    Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 25 | 2012 Varia Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 (EBGR 2009) Angelos Chaniotis Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/2117 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.2117 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 26 October 2012 Number of pages: 185-232 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Angelos Chaniotis, « Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 », Kernos [Online], 25 | 2012, Online since 20 November 2014, connection on 15 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ kernos/2117 Kernos Kernos 25(2012),p.185-232. Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion 2009 (EBGR 2009) The 22nd issue of the Epigraphic Bulletin for Greek Religion presents a selection of the epigraphicpublicationsof2009andsomeadditionstoearlierissues.Followingthepractice ofthemostrecentissues,emphasiswasplacedonthepresentationofnew corporaand editions of new texts, rather than on summarizing books or articles that use epigraphic material.Duetodemandingresearchandadministrativeduties,thisyearIhavebeenunable tocompletethesurveyofjournalsontime.Inordertoavoiddelaysinthepublicationof Kernos , I could only present part of 2009’s publications. This issue contains several very interestingnewepigraphicfinds.Iwouldliketohighlightthenewfragmentsthathavebeen addedtothephilosophicalinscriptionofDiogenesofOinoanda( 65 ).Theymakepossible thereconstructionofalargepassage,inwhichtheEpicureanphilosopherrejectstheidea
  • Asset Technology Employment-Entrepreneurship

    Asset Technology Employment-Entrepreneurship

    A sset T echn o lo gy Em plo ym en t-E ntrepreneurship Projects ASSET TECHNOLOGY PROMOTION OF EMPLOYMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT OF THE SOCIAL ECONOMY SECTOR “Local Action Plan for the Integration of Vulnerable Groups - Disabled people, of the Municipalities of Ilion and Agii Anargiri-Kamatero” Development Partnership: ERGAXIA Area of Intervention: Municipalities of Ilion and Agii Anargiri - Kamatero Target Group: People with disabilities http://www.ergaxia.gr “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of the Municipality of Pylos-Nestor” Development Partnership: PALAIPYLOS Area of Intervention: Municipality of Pylos-Nestor Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.palaipylos.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of the Municipalities of Argithea, Mouzaki, Palamas, Sofades” Development Partnership: KIERION Area of Intervention: Municipalities of Argithea, Mouzaki, Palamas, Sofades / Karditsa Regional Unit Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.topeko-kierion.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Social Integration of Vulnerable Groups of Thesprotia” Development Partnership: THESPROTIAN SOCIAL COOPERATION Area of Intervention: Regional Unit of Thesprotia Target Group: Long term unemployed over the age of 45, unemployed living in poverty http://www.thekoisi.gr/ “Local Action Plan for Employment «HERMES»” Development Partnership: TOPSA HERMES Area of Intervention: Regional Unit of Thessaloniki Target Group: Unemployed women and young people, young scientists http://www.topsa-hermes.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Development of Employment in Amfiloxia” Development Partnership: D.P. Amfiloxia Area of Intervention: Municipality of Amfiloxia Target Group: Unemployed women and young people, young scientists and farmers http://www.topsa-amfiloxia.gr/ “Local Action Plan for the Development of Employment in Sikionion Municipality” Development Partnership: D.P.
  • A HISTORY of the PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW Peoples Of

    A HISTORY of the PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW Peoples Of

    A HISTORY OF THE PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW peoples of the ancient world have given rise to so much controversy as the Pelasgians; and of few, after some centuries of discussion, is so little clearly established. Like the Phoenicians, the Celts, and of recent years the Teutons, they have been a peg upon which to hang all sorts of speculation ; and whenever an inconvenient circumstance has deranged the symmetry of a theory, it has been safe to ' call it Pelasgian and pass on.' One main reason for this ill-repute, into which the Pelasgian name has fallen, has been the very uncritical fashion in which the ancient statements about the Pelasgians have commonly been mishandled. It has been the custom to treat passages from Homer, from Herodotus, from Ephorus, and from Pausanias, as if they were so many interchangeable bricks to build up the speculative edifice; as if it needed no proof that genealogies found sum- marized in Pausanias or Apollodorus ' were taken by them from poems of the same class with the Theogony, or from ancient treatises, or from prevalent opinions ;' as if, further, ' if we find them mentioning the Pelasgian nation, they do at all events belong to an age when that name and people had nothing of the mystery which they bore to the eyes of the later Greeks, for instance of Strabo;' and as though (in the same passage) a statement of Stephanus of Byzantium about Pelasgians in Italy ' were evidence to the same effect, perfectly unexceptionable and as strictly historical as the case will admit of 1 No one doubts, of course, either that popular tradition may transmit, or that late writers may transcribe, statements which come from very early, and even from contemporary sources.
  • Fhu2xellcj7lgbnexipovzl4g6a.Pdf

    Fhu2xellcj7lgbnexipovzl4g6a.Pdf

    Griechenland Attika...................................................................................................................................................4 Athen-Zentrum.....................................................................................................................................4 Athen-Nord...........................................................................................................................................5 Athen-Süd.............................................................................................................................................6 Athen-West...........................................................................................................................................7 Piräus....................................................................................................................................................8 Inseln....................................................................................................................................................9 Ostattika..............................................................................................................................................10 Westattika............................................................................................................................................11 Epirus.................................................................................................................................................12 Arta.....................................................................................................................................................12