Jjmonl 1402.Pmd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jjmonl 1402.Pmd alactic Observer GJohn J. McCarthy Observatory Volume 7, No. 2 February 2014 Beneath the Clouds: An in-depth look at Jupiter's wacky weather machine. See inside, pages 6 and 20. The John J. McCarthy Observatory Galactic Observer New Milford High School Editorial Committee 388 Danbury Road Managing Editor New Milford, CT 06776 Bill Cloutier Phone/Voice: (860) 210-4117 Production & Design Phone/Fax: (860) 354-1595 www.mccarthyobservatory.org Allan Ostergren Website Development JJMO Staff Marc Polansky It is through their efforts that the McCarthy Observatory Technical Support has established itself as a significant educational and Bob Lambert recreational resource within the western Connecticut Dr. Parker Moreland community. Steve Barone Jim Johnstone Colin Campbell Carly KleinStern Dennis Cartolano Bob Lambert Mike Chiarella Roger Moore Route Jeff Chodak Parker Moreland, PhD Bill Cloutier Allan Ostergren Cecilia Dietrich Marc Polansky Dirk Feather Joe Privitera Randy Fender Monty Robson Randy Finden Don Ross John Gebauer Gene Schilling Elaine Green Katie Shusdock Tina Hartzell Jon Wallace Tom Heydenburg Paul Woodell Amy Ziffer In This Issue OUT THE WINDOW ON YOUR LEFT .................................... 4 JUPITER AND ITS MOONS ................................................ 20 SCHILLER TO HANSTEEN .................................................. 5 TRANSIT OF THE JUPITER'S RED SPOT .............................. 17 LRO IMAGES CHANG'E 3 LANDING SITE ........................... 6 SUNRISE AND SUNSET ..................................................... 17 JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF JUPITER ................................ 7 CHANGING SEASONS ON SATURN ....................................... 8 ASTRONOMICAL AND HISTORICAL EVENTS ........................ 17 PHOBOS REVISITED ......................................................... 8 REFERENCES ON DISTANCES ........................................... 20 PASSING OF A TELESCOPE-MAKING LEGEND ....................... 8 INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION/IRIDIUM SATELLITES ......... 20 JOHN GLENN AND THE FLIGHT OF FREEDOM 7 ................... 11 SOLAR ACTIVITY .......................................................... 20 OUT OF HIBERNATION .................................................... 11 COVER CREDITS ........................................................... 20 LUNAR MYSTERY SOLVED? ............................................. 12 SECOND SATURDAY STARS .............................................. 21 COSMIC WAKEUP CALL ................................................. 13 FEBRUARY GRAPHIC CALENDAR ..................................... 22 MARTIAN MYSTERY ....................................................... 14 FEBRUARY HISTORY ....................................................... 14 SUPERNOVAS ................................................................. 15 A STAR CLUSTER FOR TREKKIES ..................................... 15 SOVIET MOON PROGRAM ............................................... 16 FEBRUARY NIGHTS ........................................................ 16 2 • Feb 2014 http://www.mccarthyobservatory.org February Calendar and Space Exploration Almanac o d ( 1 w h v 3 t p i John L. Dobson 1915-2014 http://www.mccarthyobservatory.org Feb 2014 • 3 “Out the Window on Your Left” Located between the craters Hansteen and Billy, t’s been over 40 years since we left the last foot is a triangular-shaped outcrop: Mons Hansteen, a des- print on the dusty lunar surface. Sadly, as a ignated lunar Red Spot. Lunar Red Spots are dome- Ination founded on exploration and the conquest like features of possible volcanic origin. Unlike other of new frontiers, we appear to have lost our will to volcanic domes, Red Spots were formed by much lead as a space-faring nation. But, what if the aver- more viscous, non-mare (non-basaltic) lavas. It is age citizen had the means to visit our only natural surmised that volcanoes such as Mons Hansteen were satellite; what would they see out the window of active shortly after the Imbrium basin impact 3.9 bil- their spacecraft as they entered orbit around the lion years ago, but before mare lavas flooded the im- Moon? This column may provide some thoughts to pact basin 3.5 billion years ago. ponder when planning your visit (if only in your South of Mare Humorum is Lacus Excellentiae imagination). (“Lake of Excellence”). A relatively small and irregu- lar lunar mare, it is bounded by the rugged lunar high- lands, with few distinguishing features. However, the rim of one of the largest craters on the nearside (Schickard) is visible nearby. From edge to edge, Schickard’s rim extends approximately 134 miles (215 km). Spectral analysis of the region around Schickard and Schiller suggests the presence of ancient im- pact basins and mare lava underlying the overbur- den layer of highlands material and impact ejecta. The proposed source of the mare lava may be a previously unrecognized basin (Schickard-Mee basin) and cryptomare adjacent to the crater Schickard, as well as from the Schiller-Zucchius impact basin. Lunar seas or lakes are actually expansive low-lying plains formed by ancient lava flows The sun rises on the Moon’s southwestern limb in our photo this month. Our view extends from the elongated crater Schiller in the southern high- lands to the crater Hansteen north of Mare Humorum (“Sea of Moisture”). While only partially visible in the image, Mare Humorum is the site of an ancient impact basin, approximately 500 miles (825 km) across and filled with molten rock to a depth of almost 2 miles (3 km). The impact basin may also be older than origi- nally thought, based upon a recent analysis of laser altimeter data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Or- biter (LRO) used to reconstruct an impact event Gassendi was a possible destination for the sequence for the Moon’s basins. Apollo 17 mission, to sample rocks from the Breaching the basin’s northern wall is the large, crater's peak for evidence of ancient impacts. fractured floor crater, Gassendi. At 55 miles (90 km) The boulder at the top of this LROC image is in diameter, its bright central peaks rise more than about 25 meters wide (62 feet). Credit: NASA/ 4,000 feet (1,200 m) above the surrounding plain. GSFC/Arizona State University 4 • Feb 2014 http://www.mccarthyobservatory.org Mare Nectaris and Crater Fracastorius Schiller Crater and the Schiller-Zucchius Basin Mare Serenitatis SchillerOrion Rules the to Winter Sky HansteenMare Imbrium http://www.mccarthyobservatory.org Feb 2014 • 5 LRO Images Chang’e 3 Landing Site The Chinese soft-landed their Chang’e 3 spacecraft setting. In the image (below, left), the lander and (carrying a rover) on the Moon on December 14, 2013. rover are visible as bright pixels, casting long shad- It set down on the lava plains of Mare Imbrium (Sea ows. For confirmation, the components are not vis- of Rains), southeast of Sinus Iridum (Bay of Rain- ible in an image of the same area taken in June (be- bows) and just east of a 1,500 foot (450 m) diameter low, right), under similar lighting conditions. LRO impact crater. Images of the Chang’e 3 lander and rover images were provided by NASA/Goddard Space- were made available by the Chinese Academy of Sci- flight Center/Arizona State University. ences. The rover is only about 5 feet (1.5 m) across; In late December, the LRO passed over the land- however, its visibility is increased by its reflective ing site. At the time, the orbiter was approximately solar panels and the shadow cast under a low angle 90 miles (150 km) above the site and the Sun was Sun. Chang'e 3 Lander Credit: Beijing Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering 6 • Feb 2014 http://www.mccarthyobservatory.org Journey to the Center of Jupiter million miles, with a steady increase in radiation lev- els. Jupiter’s magnetic field has an intrinsic strength We are currently in the observing season of Jupi- 20,000 times greater than Earth’s and is saturated with ter. While the gas giant was closest to Earth in early a sea of charged particles. The Sun facing side of the January, it is now well placed in the early evening field is shaped and compressed by the solar wind, sky. The four Galilean moons are clearly visible as while the far side extends out past the orbit of Saturn. companion stars as they travel in synchronous orbits Inside the magnetosphere, our NTV encounters sev- around Jupiter. Prominent on the planet’s disk are al- eral small and irregular moons possible remnants from ternating bands of bright and dark clouds within the ancient collisions or captured debris left over from gaseous atmosphere. the solar system’s formation, before crossing the or- Cassini was the last spacecraft to visit Jupiter (13 bits of the four large, Galilean moons. Visible on the years ago on its way to Saturn), and it will be another Jupiter facing side of the outer moon Callisto are a two years before the Juno spacecraft arrives in July series of large concentric ridges surrounding Valhalla, 2016. While robotic spacecraft may one day explore an ancient impact basin. Ganymede is the next moon Jupiter’s moons, exploring the gas giant is more chal- encountered. Larger than the planet Mercury, its icy lenging (the Galileo atmospheric probe was destroyed surface is masked by large dark regions, impact cra- by Jupiter’s crushing atmospheric pressure less than ters and intersecting ridges and grooves. Closer to Ju- 100 miles below the cloud tops). piter is the enigmatic world, Europa. Its relatively But what if you could explore the depths of the gas smooth surface is crisscrossed with
Recommended publications
  • Alactic Observer Gjohn J
    alactic Observer GJohn J. McCarthy Observatory Volume 5, No. 2 February 2012 Belly of the Beast At the center of the Milky Way galaxy, a gas cloud is on a perilous journey into a supermassive black hole. As the cloud stretches and accelerates, it gives away the location of its silent predator. For more information , see page 9 inside, or go to http://www.nasa.gov/ centers/goddard/news/topstory/2008/ blackhole_slumber.html. Credit: NASA/CXC/MIT/Frederick K. Baganoff et al. The John J. McCarthy Observatory Galactic Observvvererer New Milford High School Editorial Committee 388 Danbury Road Managing Editor New Milford, CT 06776 Bill Cloutier Phone/Voice: (860) 210-4117 Production & Design Phone/Fax: (860) 354-1595 Allan Ostergren www.mccarthyobservatory.org Website Development John Gebauer JJMO Staff Marc Polansky It is through their efforts that the McCarthy Observatory has Josh Reynolds established itself as a significant educational and recreational Technical Support resource within the western Connecticut community. Bob Lambert Steve Barone Allan Ostergren Dr. Parker Moreland Colin Campbell Cecilia Page Dennis Cartolano Joe Privitera Mike Chiarella Bruno Ranchy Jeff Chodak Josh Reynolds Route Bill Cloutier Barbara Richards Charles Copple Monty Robson Randy Fender Don Ross John Gebauer Ned Sheehey Elaine Green Gene Schilling Tina Hartzell Diana Shervinskie Tom Heydenburg Katie Shusdock Phil Imbrogno Jon Wallace Bob Lambert Bob Willaum Dr. Parker Moreland Paul Woodell Amy Ziffer In This Issue THE YEAR OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM ................................ 4 SUNRISE AND SUNSET .................................................. 11 OUT THE WINDOW ON YOUR LEFT ............................... 5 ASTRONOMICAL AND HISTORICAL EVENTS ...................... 11 FRA MAURA ................................................................ 5 REFERENCES ON DISTANCES .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • February 2022
    FORECAST OF UPCOMING ANNIVERSARIES -- FEBRUARY 2022 116 Years Ago – 1902 February 4: Charles Lindbergh’s birthday. 90 Years Ago – 1932 February 19: Joseph Kerwin's birthday. 60 Years Ago – 1962 February 8: Tiros 4 launched by Thor Delta, 7:43 a.m., EST, Cape Canaveral, Fla. February 20: Mercury Atlas 6 (MA-6), Friendship 7 launched, with astronaut John H. Glenn, 9:47:39 a.m., first American to orbit the earth, Cape Canaveral, Fla. February 27: Discoverer 38 (Corona Mission 9030) launched by Thor, Vandenberg AFB. The last Discoverer named Corona mission. 55 Years Ago – 1967 February 4: Lunar Orbiter 3 launched by Atlas Agena, 8:17 p.m., EST, Cape Canaveral, Fla. February 8: Diademe 1 launched by Diamant A, Hammaguir, Algeria, French satellite. February 15: Diademe 2 launched by Diamant A, Hammaguir, Algeria, French satellite. 50 Years Ago – 1972 February 14: USSR launches Luna 20 (Lunik 20) at 03:27:59 UTC by Proton K from Baikonur which soft lands on the Moon four days later. A rotary-percussion drill retrieved samples from the surface which were returned to Earth by capsule on February 25. 45 Years Ago -1977 February 7: USSR launches Soyuz-24 from Baikonur. Cosmonauts: Viktor V.Gorbatko and Yuri N.Glazkov. Ferry flight to Salyut-5 space station. February 18: Enterprise, the first space shuttle orbiter, was flight tested at Dryden Flight Research Center. 40 Years Ago – 1982 February 25: Westar IV launched by Delta, 7:04 p.m., EST, Cape Canaveral, Fla. 35 Years Ago – 1987 February 5: Soyuz TM-2 launched from Baikonur, 2138 Moscow time, Yuri V.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo Over the Moon: a View from Orbit (Nasa Sp-362)
    chl APOLLO OVER THE MOON: A VIEW FROM ORBIT (NASA SP-362) Chapter 1 - Introduction Harold Masursky, Farouk El-Baz, Frederick J. Doyle, and Leon J. Kosofsky [For a high resolution picture- click here] Objectives [1] Photography of the lunar surface was considered an important goal of the Apollo program by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The important objectives of Apollo photography were (1) to gather data pertaining to the topography and specific landmarks along the approach paths to the early Apollo landing sites; (2) to obtain high-resolution photographs of the landing sites and surrounding areas to plan lunar surface exploration, and to provide a basis for extrapolating the concentrated observations at the landing sites to nearby areas; and (3) to obtain photographs suitable for regional studies of the lunar geologic environment and the processes that act upon it. Through study of the photographs and all other arrays of information gathered by the Apollo and earlier lunar programs, we may develop an understanding of the evolution of the lunar crust. In this introductory chapter we describe how the Apollo photographic systems were selected and used; how the photographic mission plans were formulated and conducted; how part of the great mass of data is being analyzed and published; and, finally, we describe some of the scientific results. Historically most lunar atlases have used photointerpretive techniques to discuss the possible origins of the Moon's crust and its surface features. The ideas presented in this volume also rely on photointerpretation. However, many ideas are substantiated or expanded by information obtained from the huge arrays of supporting data gathered by Earth-based and orbital sensors, from experiments deployed on the lunar surface, and from studies made of the returned samples.
    [Show full text]
  • A 70Th Degree Lunar Gravity Model &Lpar
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 102, NO. E7, PAGES 16,339-16,359, JULY 25, 1997 A 70th degree lunar gravity model (GLGM-2) from Clementine and other tracking data FrankG. R. Lemoine,David E. Smith,Maria T. Zuber,• Gregory A. Neumann,• and David D. Rowlands Laboratoryfor Terrestrial Physics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland Abstract. A spherical harmonic model of the lunar gravity field complete to degreeand order 70 has been developedfrom S band Doppler tracking data from the C]ementine mission,as well as historical tracking data from Lunar Orbiters 1-5 and the Apollo 15 and 16 subsate]lites. The mode] combines361,000 Doppler observationsfrom Clementine with 347,000 historical observations. The historical data consistof mostly 60-s Doppler with a noiseof 0.25 to severalmm/s. The C]ementine data consist of mostly 10-s Doppler data, with a data noise of 0.25 mm/s for the observationsfrom the Deep SpaceNetwork, and 2.5 mm/s for the data from a naval tracking station at Pomonkey,Maryland. Observationsprovided C]ementine, provide the strongest satellite constraint on the Moon's low-degree field. In contrast the historical data, collectedby spacecraftthat had lower periapsis altitudes, provide distributed regionsof high-resolutioncoverage within +29 ø of the nearsidelunar equator. To obtain the solution for a high-degreefield in the absenceof a uniform distribution of observations,we applied an a priori power law constraintof theform 15 x 10-5//2 whichhad the effectof limitingthe gravitational power and noiseat short wavelengths.Coefficients through degree and order 18 are not significantlyaffected by the constraint, and so the model permits geophysical analysis of effects of the major basins at degrees 10-12.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoot the Moon – 1967
    Video Transcript for Archival Research Catalog (ARC) Identifier 45011 Assignment: Shoot the Moon – 1967 Narrator: The assignment was specific: get photographs of the surface of the Moon that are good enough to determine whether or not it’s safe for a man to land there. But appearances can be deceiving, just as deceiving as trying to get a good picture of, well, a candy apple. Doesn’t seem to be too much of a problem, just set it up, light it, and snap the picture. Easy, quick, simple. But it can be tough. To begin with, the apple is some distance away, so you can’t get to it to just set it up, light it, and so on. To make things even more difficult, it isn’t even holding still; it’s moving around in circles. Now timing is important. You have to take your picture when the apple is nearest to you so you get the most detail and when the light that’s available is at the best angle for the photo. And even that’s not all. You are moving too, in circles. You’re both turning and circling about the apple. Now, about that assignment. As the technology of man in space was developing, it became more and more apparent that our knowledge of the Moon’s surface as a possible landing site was not sufficient. To land man safely on the Moon and get him safely off again, we had to know whether we could set up a precise enough trajectory to reach the Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • ILWS Report 137 Moon
    Returning to the Moon Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Dirk HR Spennemann Guy Murphy Returning to the Moon Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Dirk HR Spennemann Guy Murphy Albury February 2020 © 2011, revised 2020. All rights reserved by the authors. The contents of this publication are copyright in all countries subscribing to the Berne Convention. No parts of this report may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, in existence or to be invented, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the authors, except where permitted by law. Preferred citation of this Report Spennemann, Dirk HR & Murphy, Guy (2020). Returning to the Moon. Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize. Institute for Land, Water and Society Report nº 137. Albury, NSW: Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University. iv, 35 pp ISBN 978-1-86-467370-8 Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are solely the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of Charles Sturt University. Contact Associate Professor Dirk HR Spennemann, MA, PhD, MICOMOS, APF Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury NSW 2640, Australia. email: [email protected] Spennemann & Murphy (2020) Returning to the Moon: Heritage Issues Raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Page ii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. HUMAN ARTEFACTS ON THE MOON 3 What Have These Missions Left BehinD? 4 Impactor Missions 10 Lander Missions 11 Rover Missions 11 Sample Return Missions 11 Human Missions 11 The Lunar Environment & ImpLications for Artefact Preservation 13 Decay caused by ascent module 15 Decay by solar radiation 15 Human Interference 16 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moon As a Laboratory for Biological Contamination Research
    The Moon As a Laboratory for Biological Contamina8on Research Jason P. Dworkin1, Daniel P. Glavin1, Mark Lupisella1, David R. Williams1, Gerhard Kminek2, and John D. Rummel3 1NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 2European Space AgenCy, Noordwijk, The Netherlands 3SETI InsQtute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA Introduction Catalog of Lunar Artifacts Some Apollo Sites Spacecraft Landing Type Landing Date Latitude, Longitude Ref. The Moon provides a high fidelity test-bed to prepare for the Luna 2 Impact 14 September 1959 29.1 N, 0 E a Ranger 4 Impact 26 April 1962 15.5 S, 130.7 W b The microbial analysis of exploration of Mars, Europa, Enceladus, etc. Ranger 6 Impact 2 February 1964 9.39 N, 21.48 E c the Surveyor 3 camera Ranger 7 Impact 31 July 1964 10.63 S, 20.68 W c returned by Apollo 12 is Much of our knowledge of planetary protection and contamination Ranger 8 Impact 20 February 1965 2.64 N, 24.79 E c flawed. We can do better. Ranger 9 Impact 24 March 1965 12.83 S, 2.39 W c science are based on models, brief and small experiments, or Luna 5 Impact 12 May 1965 31 S, 8 W b measurements in low Earth orbit. Luna 7 Impact 7 October 1965 9 N, 49 W b Luna 8 Impact 6 December 1965 9.1 N, 63.3 W b Experiments on the Moon could be piggybacked on human Luna 9 Soft Landing 3 February 1966 7.13 N, 64.37 W b Surveyor 1 Soft Landing 2 June 1966 2.47 S, 43.34 W c exploration or use the debris from past missions to test and Luna 10 Impact Unknown (1966) Unknown d expand our current understanding to reduce the cost and/or risk Luna 11 Impact Unknown (1966) Unknown d Surveyor 2 Impact 23 September 1966 5.5 N, 12.0 W b of future missions to restricted destinations in the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2017 Winnicentrics the Newsletter of the Winnipeg Centre of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada
    Winnicentrics—the newsletter of the Winnipeg Centre of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada FebFebFeFebruary 2017 Winnicentrics The Newsletter of the Winnipeg Centre of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada Regular meetings of the Winnipeg Centre are held in the Robert B. Schultz lecture thea- tre in St. John’s College at the University of Manitoba. The theatre is on the lower (basement) floor of the College. Meetings are usually held on the second Friday of each month from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m. After the meetings, members who wish to do so usually retire for pizza and more conversation about astronomical subjects. The June meeting is not held at St. John’s College but is instead a barbeque at either a member’s house or at Upcoming Events Glenlea. Next meeting Meeting dates and meeting places may be adjusted during exam times and during February 10, 2017 Bomber home games or stadium events. Penumbral Lunar Eclipse at February Meeting Schedule Moonrise (full moon) February 10 7:00 pm: Beginner’s Session: “Tides in the Solar System” - Mick Rice Members’ Observing Night February 11 (weather permitting) 7:30 pm: Regular session Announcements - Jay Anderson Oak Hammock Marsh Astronomy What’s Up? - Bryan Stach Night What’s New? - Ian Cameron 8:30 pm: Break for coffee and refreshments February 16th, 7:00pm (donations gratefully accepted) Venus at Greatest Ilumination 9:00 pm: Guest Speaker, Jay Anderson: The Astronomy of Babylon (mag –4.8) Outline: February 17 The civilizations of Sumer, Babylon, and Assyria developed a rich astro- nomical culture that stretched for more than two millennia before being U of M Open House absorbed by the Persian Empire around 550 BC and the Greek Empire a century later.
    [Show full text]
  • The Surveyorprogram
    ..... _° o0ooooo _ https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19770025235 2018-04-11T18:05:23+00:00Z .4;" ' F 00000001-TSA03 ORIGINAL PAGE IS OF POOR QUALIo/,y I 1 i 4 , I i IIII '1 ', !, 00000001-TSA04 i._ ,) I l L 1 I t i I / WDC-A-R 77.02 .. National Space Science Dora Center/ World Om Center A For Rockets end Satellites Catalog of Lunar - Mission ;. Data ' ': TechnicalCoordinator - WINIFRED SAWTELL CAMERON Editors ELLEN J. MANTEL • ELIZABETH ,_, MILLER July 1977 i-- 00000001-TSA05 / PREFACE i, We acknowledge with thanks those persons, too numerous to name, of the National Space Science D_ta Center (NSSDC) who have contributed to the production of this Ca_log. Appreciation of the contributions of the experimenters is also hereby acknowledged. _,eir data submission and explanatory documentation form the base o£ this Catalog. _e NSSDC per- ... r sonnel activity included data and information handling, verification, ! data description, inventory, illustrations, and photography, as well as : document production, and involved both the acquisition scientists and ! the Data Center's onsite contractor, General Telephone and Electronics/ ' Information Systems, PMI Facilities Management Corporation personnel. _: The Data Center strives to serve the scientific community in a useful = L manner so that the scientific data deposited there can be disseminated _: for continued and further analysis. Scientists are invited to submit : comments or recommendations regarding the format of this Catalog, the .: data announced herein, and the services provided by NSSDC. Recipients ., are urged to inform other potential data users of its availability. _t i ._ IVinifredSawtell Cameron _i Elizabeth R.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Exploration of the Moon
    Scientific Exploration of the Moon DR FAROUK EL-BAZ Research Director, Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA The exploration of the Moon has involved a highly successful interdisciplinary approach to solving a number of scientific problems. It has required the interactions of astronomers to classify surface features; cartographers to map interesting areas; geologists to unravel the history of the lunar crust; geochemists to decipher its chemical makeup; geophysicists to establish its structure; physicists to study the environment; and mathematicians to work with engineers on optimizing the delivery to and from the Moon of exploration tools. Although, to date, the harvest of lunar science has not answered all the questions posed, it has already given us a much better understanding of the Moon and its history. Additionally, the lessons learned from this endeavor have been applied successfully to planetary missions. The scientific exploration of the Moon has not ended; it continues to this day and plans are being formulated for future lunar missions. The exploration of the Moon undoubtedly started Moon, and Luna 3 provided the first glimpse of the with the naked eye at the dawn of history,1 when lunar far side. After these significant steps, the mankind hunted in the wilderness and settled the American space program began its contribution to earliest farms. Our knowledge of the Moon took a lunar exploration with the Ranger hard landers' quantum jump when Galileo Galilei trained his from 1964 to 1965. These missions provided us with telescope toward it. Since then, generations of the first close-up views (nearly 0.3 m resolution) of researchers have followed suit utilizing successively the lunar surface by transmitting pictures until just more complex instruments." The most significant before crashing.6 The pictures confirmed that the quantum jump in the knowledge of our only natural lunar dark areas, the maria, were relatively flat and satellite came with the advent of the space age, topographically simple.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperation Or Competition?
    Exploring the Universe: Cooperation or Competition? European Forum Alpbach 2013 Shuang-Nan Zhang Director, Center for Particle Astrophysics Institute of High Energy Physics Chief Scientist, Space Science Division National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 Day 1 2 Ways of learning Write down one thing you think you are good at doing Write down how you learnt of doing this Choose and write down one of these answers: (1) From lecturing in classroom (2) By yourself: reading, asking, discussion, practicing (3) Other 3 Importance of asking and discussion The greatest scholar and teacher in Chinese history, Confucius (孔夫子), told us: “Among every three people, there must be someone who know more than me (三人一 行,必有我师)” The Nobel Laureate C.N. Yang (杨振宁) once said “Most of my knowledge comes from asking and discussing with my fellow students”. In Chinese, an intellectual is called “a person learning by asking (有学问的人)” 4 Nobel Laureate C.N. Yang (杨振宁) and me C.N. Yang is the “person learning by asking (有学问的人)” 5 Albert Einstein (爱因斯坦) and me I am the “person learning by asking (有学问的人)” 6 Traditional and interactive teaching Traditional teaching: one directional delivery of information from the teacher to students (notebooks) Role of teacher: information delivery Success measured by rate of information delivered Interactive teaching: asking + discussion Role of teacher: stimulate and moderate the process Success measured by rate of information received Just like communications: it only matters how much is received at the receiver’s end! Barriers must be removed for efficient communications. 7 Interruptions are invited during these seminars You are invited to interrupt me during at any time Asking questions, making points and comments, and even challenging me.
    [Show full text]