DOCSLIB.ORG

TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AGENDA Friday, January 17, 2003 Staff Contact: Kim Kawada (619) 595-5394 Or [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AGENDA Friday, January 17, 2003 Staff Contact: Kim Kawada (619) 595-5394 Or Kka@Sandag.Org Members Joe Kellejian, Chair Councilmember, Solana Beach (Representing North County Coastal) Dick Murphy, Vice Chair Mayor, City of San Diego Mickey Cafagna Mayor, Poway (Representing North County Inland) Art Madrid Mayor, La Mesa (Representing East County) TRANSPORTATION Ron Roberts Chair, Board of Supervisors COMMITTEE County of San Diego Vacant AGENDA (Representing South Bay) Leon Williams, Chair Metropolitan Transit Development Board Friday, January 17, 2003 Vacant North San Diego County 9:00 a.m. – 12 Noon Transit Development Board SANDAG Board Room Vacant 401 B Street, 7th Floor San Diego County Regional Airport Authority San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Alternates Ron Morrison (Representing South Bay) Councilmember, National City Ramona Finnila AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS (Representing North County Coastal) Councilmember, Carlsbad Hal Martin · HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE/MANAGED LANE (Representing North County Inland) Councilmember, San Marcos STRATEGY Jack Dale (Representing East County) · 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: Councilmember, Santee PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS Jim Madaffer Councilmember, City of San Diego Bill Horn · 2002 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Supervisor, County of San Diego Bob Emery Metropolitan Transit Development Board Vacant North San Diego County Transit Development Board Vacant San Diego County Regional Airport Authority PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING Advisory Members Pedro Orso-Delgado District Director, District 11 California Department of Transportation MISSION STATEMENT Tom Larwin, General Manager Metropolitan Transit The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making. Development Board SANDAG builds consensus, makes strategic plans, obtains and allocates resources, and provides Karen King, Executive Director information on a broad range of topics pertinent to the region’s quality of life. North San Diego County Transit Development Board San Diego Association of Governments l 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Gary L. Gallegos (619) 595-5300 l Fax (619) 595-5305 l www.sandag.org Executive Director, SANDAG Welcome to SANDAG! Members of the public may speak to the Transportation Committee on any item at the time the Committee is considering the item. Please complete a Speaker’s Slip which is located in the rear of the room and then present the slip to Committee staff. Also, members of the public are invited to address the Committee on any issue under the agenda item entitled Public Comments/Communications. Speakers are limited to three minutes. The Transportation Committee may take action on any item appearing on the agenda. This agenda and related staff reports can be accessed at www.sandag.org under meetings on SANDAG’s Web site. Public comments regarding the agenda can be forwarded to SANDAG via the e-mail comment form also available on the Web site. E-mail comments should be received no later than noon on the Tuesday preceding the Thursday Transportation Committee meeting. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 595-5300 in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 595-5300 or fax (619) 595-5305. SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 1-800-COMMUTE or see www.sdcommute.com for route information. 2 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE AGENDA Friday, January 17, 2003 Staff contact: Kim Kawada (619) 595-5394 or [email protected] ITEM # RECOMMENDATION CONSENT ITEMS (1 to 6) The Transportation Committee will take action on the consent agenda without further discussion and with one vote unless an item is pulled by a Committee member or by a member of the public for comment. + 1. APPOINTMENT OF TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP – APPOINT INTERSTATES 5/805 TRANSPORTATION STUDY (Elisa Arias) In December 2002, the Transportation Committee appointed a working group to provide input and assistance to SANDAG in the preparation of the I-5/I-805 South Bay Transportation Study. Upon further discussion with Caltrans, the study area has been expanded to include the entire Interstate 805 corridor. The Transportation Committee is asked to expand the Technical Working Group to include representation from the expanded study area. + 2. REGIONAL ARTERIAL SYSTEM (RAS) – FUND APPROVE REALLOCATIONS AND SCHEDULE EXTENSIONS (José Nuncio) For projects delayed by 12 months or greater, the RAS Use-It-or-Lose-It Policy requires the Cities/County Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) to make a mandatory recommendation to the Transportation Committee either to reallocate funds, determine certain projects ineligible to compete in the following funding cycle, or grant a schedule extension. CTAC has reviewed five delayed projects over the past quarter and recommends: (1) reallocating funds from the City of Poway’s Espola Road project ($290,000) and the City of Oceanside’s SR 78/Rancho del Oro Drive Interchange project ($1 million) to the SANDAG RAS Reserve; and (2) approving schedule extensions for the City of Chula Vista’s I-805/ Olympic Parkway Interchange, the City of Escondido’s Bear Valley Parkway/East Valley Parkway, and the City of Solana Beach’s -I5/ Lomas Santa Fe Drive Interchange projects. The Transportation Committee is asked to approve the recommended fund reallocations schedule extensions. + 3. FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES APPROVE (TEA) PROGRAM QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT (Sookyung Kim) This report summarizes the progress made on the TEA projects during the period October 1 to December 31, 2002. One TEA-funded project, the Coastal Rail Trail being developed by the Cities of Oceanside, Carlsbad, Encinitas, and Solana Beach, has been delayed. The project has already received the maximum schedule extension allowed by the TEA Use-It-or-Lose-It Policy approved by SANDAG, and the duration of additional project delays is uncertain. The Transportation Committee is asked to approve reallocating the unused TEA funding to portions of the Coastal Rail Trail project in the Cities of Oceanside and Solana Beach, with the remainder to the TEA Reserve. 3 ITEM # RECOMMENDATION + 4. WALKABLE COMMUNITIES REPRESENTATION FOR FUTURE APPROVE FUNDING AND FUNDING CRITERIA (Rob Rundle) The Walkable Communities Working Group has requested representation in discussions about the TransNet sales tax extension measure to ensure that pedestrian access issues are adequately considered in the measure. In addition, the Working Group requests participation in the development of the $25 million Smart Growth Pilot Program outlined in the Draft 2030 Regional Transportation Plan, MOBILITY 2030. The Transportation Committee is asked to approve these requests, subject to the concurrence of the SANDAG Board of Directors through approval of the Transportation Committee actions. + 5. TIME EXTENSION FOR STATE ROUTE 125 TOLL ROAD (Dean INFORMATION Hiatt) California Transportation Ventures (CTV) has requested from Caltrans an amendment to their Development Franchise Agreement. The request is to revise the December 31, 2002 stipulated date in Amendment V to the Agreement to issue an Unlimited Notice to Proceed to their contractor for the SR 125 Toll Road. This item reports on the status of CTV’s request. + 6. 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: SUMMARY OF INFORMATION PUBLIC COMMENTS (Kim Kawada) The public comment period for the Draft 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), MOBILITY 2030, and its Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) closed on December 30, 2002. This item summarizes the major comments received on the Draft RTP and EIR as well as preliminary responses to the comments. 7. PUBLIC COMMENTS/COMMUNICATIONS (Speakers limited to three minutes each.) REPORTS + 8. 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: HIGH OCCUPANCY INFORMATION VEHICLE/MANAGED LANE STRATEGY (Eric Pahlke) The 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), MOBILITY 2030, includes the development of an extensive system of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/Managed Lanes in the San Diego region. This systems development strategy is based upon the success of the I-15 FasTrak™ program, the experience of other major metropolitan areas, and an extensive technical analysis of transportation network alternatives. This strategy best addresses the seven goals in the 2030 RTP, including the top goal of Mobility. Staff will provide additional information about projected demand for and usage of the future system, including comparisons of average speeds, travel time savings, and average people moved in the HOV/Managed Lanes compared to general purpose lanes. 4 ITEM # RECOMMENDATION + 9. 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: PROPOSED RECOMMEND MODIFICATIONS (Richard Chavez/Linda Culp) The 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), MOBILITY 2030, includes three basic funding scenarios: (1) the $30 billion Revenue Constrained plan required by federal regulations; (2) the preferred $42 billion Reasonably Expected Revenue scenario, on which MOBILITY 2030 is based; and (3) a $66 billion Unconstrained Revenue scenario, which identifies the funding needed to fully implement all of the programs, projects, and services envisioned for 2030. Since the October 2002 release of the Draft 2030 RTP, extensive public comments have been received, and staff has worked with Caltrans, MTDB, and NCTD to refine the three scenarios. In response to comments, subsequent SANDAG Board and Transportation Committee direction, and updated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Park Mckinley West
    PARK MCKINLEY WEST www.PreSelling.com.ph FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY THE PHILIPPINES Strong Macroeconomic Fundamentals are vital to the investors and end-users www.PreSelling.com.ph FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY THE PHILIPPINES 2,186,091 105M 150.6 3.5 (in thousand 2,240 USD) (in thousands) Philippine Consumer Inflation Rate OFW OFW Workers Population Price Index as as of Oct. 2017 Remittances as of 2016 of Nov. 2017 As of Sept 2017 Top 5 Visitor COUNTRY NO. OF ARRIVALS Arrivals as of Korea 686,630 January to www.PreSelling.com.phUnited States 428,767 May 2017 China 388,896 Japan 255,819 Total: Australia 112,814 2,882,737 14.43% growth rate FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY THE PHILIPPINES Fitch Ratings for the Philippines BBB last December 10, 2017 (“stable” outlook) Updated Asian Development 6.8% Bank Growth Forecast (Fromwww.PreSelling.com.ph Asian Development Outlook 2017) FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY THE PHILIPPINES Comprehensive Tax Relaxation of foreign Amendments in Reform Package ownership restrictions existing laws in on retail and procurement and construction business www.PreSelling.com.ph Opportunities for Infrastructure projects development outside across the entire of Metro Manila country FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY THE PHILIPPINES Infrastructure led GDP to buoy the property sector The “Golden Age of Infrastructure” will support the decentralization project of the government. It would unlock land values outside of Metro Manila. The administration’s commitment to build crucial projects throughout the country would also be a big factor with regard to the strategies of real estate developers.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Manila Market Update Q4 2018
    RESEARCH METRO MANILA MARKET UPDATE Q4 2018 METRO MANILA REAL ESTATE SECTOR REVIEW FDI RISES AS NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES CONTINUE TO BET ON “ASIA’S RISING TIGER” COVER | The Philippines remains a popular investment destination for Asian investors FIGURE 1 Net Foreign Direct Investment Level By Country of Origin (in USD Mn) 905.65 SNAPSHOTS 900 750 2017 2018 Economic Indicators 600 450 384.25 263.97 300 189.33 183.51 64.4 150 13.25 8.56 6.1% 0 GDP SINGAPORE HONGKONG CHINA JAPAN Q4 2018 Source: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas The Philippines continues to attract Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) as formulates policies that will limit the economy carries on constraints in doing business in the experiencing growth of above 6% 6.1% country. On October 2018, the 11th Inflation Rate for the past 7 consecutive years. Regular Foreign Investment December 2018 The growth was mainly brought Negative List was amended to about by the increase in include five areas that will allow government spending from the 100% foreign investment present administration’s “Build, participation. The list includes Build, Build” infrastructure program. internet businesses (as excluded from mass media), teaching at 3.1% At the end of 2017, the Philippines higher education levels provided the OFW Remittances posted the highest rise in Foreign subject being taught is not a November 2018 Direct Investments (FDI) among professional subject (i.e., included in a government board or bar ASEAN countries. FDI remains examination), training centers that robust as investments increased by are engaged in short-term high- 42% in the first half of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Transport Planning and Implementation in Metropolitan Manila, 1879 to 2014
    Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.12, 2017 Railway Transport Planning and Implementation in Metropolitan Manila, 1879 to 2014 Jose Regin F. REGIDOR a, Dominic S. ALOC b a,b Institute of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, 1101, Philippines a E-mail: [email protected] b E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: This paper presents a history of rail-based transportation in Metropolitan Manila. This history focuses on urban transport including rail-based streetcars or trams that started operations in the 1880’s but were destroyed during the Second World War and never to be revived. Several plans are discussed. Among these plans are proposals for a monorail network, a heavy rail system, and the more current rail transit plans from recent studies like MMUTIS. An assessment of public transportation in Metro Manila is presented with emphasis on the counterfactual scenario of what could have been a very different metropolis if people could commute using an extensive rail transit system compared to what has been realized so far for the metropolis. Recommendations for the way forward for rail transportation in Metro Manila and further studies are stated in conclusion. Keywords: Transport Planning, Rail Transit, History 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Rail-based urban transport has had a relatively long history in Metro Manila despite what now seems to be a backlog of rail transportation in the capital city of the Philippines. In fact, the dominant mode of public transportation used to be rail-based with Manila and its adjoining areas served by a network of electric tranvias (i.e., streetcars) and heavy rail lines.
    [Show full text]
  • PNR North Commuter Railway Phase 1
    PNR North Commuter Railway Phase 1 Under Construction Connects Tutuban, Manila to Malolos, Bulacan Project type Commuter rail Length 38 km Cost PhP 105 billion Source of funds ODA-Japan Proponent Department of Transportation Start of Construction February 16, 2019 Status Active Target completion December 2021 Photo Source: JICA Developments Project Description: • May 2019: DOTr and DMCI-Taisei Corporation sign contract for Tutuban to Bocaue Phase 1 of the North line of the PNR North-South commuter railway • Feb 2019: Groundbreaking ceremony at Malolos system has 10 stations: (1) Tutuban, (2) Solis, (3) Caloocan, (4) • Jan 2019: DOTr awards Sumitomo-Mitsui Consortium contract for Malolos to Bocaue Valenzuela, (5) Meycauayan, (6) Marilao, (7) Bocaue, (8) Balagtas, • November 2018: GPH and GOJ sign exchange of notes • NEDA Board approved (9) Guiguinto, (10) Malolos. Shortens travel time from Tutuban, Manila • Jun 2017: reapproved by NEDA-ICC to Malolos, Bulacan to 35 minutes. Once operational, the system is • Feb 2015: reapproved by NEDA Board expected to serve 700,000 passengers per day. • Jun 2014: Dream Plan approved by NEDA Board • Mar 2014: Proposed in the Metro Manila Dream Plan Updated on May 23, 2019 PNR North Commuter Railway Phase 2 Under Development Connects Malolos, Bulacan to Clark Green City Project type Commuter rail Length 69 km Cost PhP 211 billion Source of funds ODA-Japan and ADB Proponent Department of Transportation Start of Construction TBA Status Active Target completion 2024 Photo Source: JICA Project Description: Developments Phase 2 of the North line of the PNR North-South commuter • May 2019: ADB approves US$ 2.75 billion support railway(NSCR) system will add 7 stations beyond the Malolos Station: • January 2019: Loan agreement signed with JICA • February 2018: Engineering works (1) Calumpit, Bulacan; and (2) Apalit, (3) San Fernando, (4) Angeles, • June 2017: NEDA Approval (5) Clark, (6) Clark International Airport, and (7) New Clark City in Pampanga.
    [Show full text]
  • The Project for Capacity Development on Transportation Planning and Database Management in the Republic of the Philippines
    Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) The Project for Capacity Development on Transportation Planning and Database Management in the Republic of the Philippines MMUTIS Update and Enhancement Project (MUCEP) Manual vol. 3 Urban Transportation Planning December 2015 ALMEC Corporation Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd PREFACE The acceleration of economic activities and population concentration in Metro Manila and other cities in the Philippines has caused severe social problems such as traffic congestion, traffic accidents, and deterioration of the living environment. The development of the public transportation network is crucial in tackling these problems. In addition, investment in infrastructure development is essential to realize a sustainable economic growth. Metro Manila, in particular, requires a transportation policy to facilitate a modal shift from private cars to public transportation by developing and integrating transportation networks and strengthening linkages between transportation modes. It is within this context that the Government of Japan has provided technical assistance to the Philippines’ Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) and other related agencies through the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) in conducting a capacity development project entitled “The Project for Capacity Development on Transportation Planning and Database Management in the Republic of the Philippines.” MUCEP, as the project is known (short for MMUTIS Update and Capacity Enhancement Project), has been carried out for more than four years, starting on 27 September 2011 and completing on 30 November 2015. The overall project goal of MUCEP is to enable the DOTC to prepare a public transportation plan for Metro Manila for strategic corridors by strengthening their capacity in transportation database management and public transportation network planning.
    [Show full text]
  • SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-C CURRENT REPORT UNDER SECTION 17 of the SECURITIES REGULATION CODE and SRC RULE 17.2 (C) THEREUNDER
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-C CURRENT REPORT UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE AND SRC RULE 17.2 (c) THEREUNDER 1. 28 May 2018 Date of Report 2. SEC Identification No: ASO93-7946 3. BIR Tax Identification No: 003-831-302-000 4. Alliance Global Group, Inc. Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter 5. Metro Manila Province, Country or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization 6. (SEC use only) Industry classification code 7. 7th Floor, 1880 Eastwood Avenue, Eastwood City CyberPark E. Rodriguez, Jr. Avenue, Bagumbayan Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines, 1110 Address of issuer’s principal office 8. (632) 709-2038 to 41 Issuer’s telephone number, including area code 9. Securities registered pursuant to Sections 8 and 12 of the SRC or Sections 4 and 8 of the RSA: Title of Class No. of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding Common 10,130,674,179 Treasury 139,153,800 10. Item 9 (b) Please see attached Press Release. S I G N A T U R E Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Regulation Code, the Issuer has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. ALLIANCE GLOBAL GROUP, INC. By: DINA INTING FVP for Finance and Corporate Information Officer AGI’S INFRACORP READY TO START SKYTRAIN PROJECT THIS YEAR Project expected to be completed in two years; to benefit up to 100,000 commuters daily MANILA, Philippines, May 28, 2018 – INFRACORP Development, Inc., the infrastructure company of tycoon Andrew Tan’s Alliance Global Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Policy Brief on Philippine Roads and Rail Infrastructure
    A Policy Brief on Philippine Roads and Rail Infrastructure AUTHOR JOHN D. FORBES is a private business consultant, author, and public speaker. He is Senior Adviser of the Arangkada Philippines Project at the American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines (AmCham) and chairman of its Legislative Committee. He is also a senior counselor for Vriens and Partners Pte. Ltd. of Singapore. John is the author of Arangkada Philippines 2010: A Business Perspective and two AmCham Roadmaps to More Foreign Investment in the Philippines. The American Enterprise Institute published his monograph Jamaica: Managing Political and Economic Change in a Third World Democracy. He received his education from Georgetown University, Princeton University, and Harvard University and served as an American diplomat for 25 years, beginning in Vietnam and the Philippines. John worked in the Bureau of East Asia and Pacific Affairs, the Bureau of Congressional Affairs, the Policy Planning Staff, the US Congress, and as a Special Assistant to the Undersecretary for Political Affairs. POLICY BRIEF EDITORIAL TEAM: Editor-in-Chief: John D. Forbes Managing Editor: Sarah Kathrina F. Gomez Economic Researcher: Charles John P. Marquez Research Assistant: Lia Angela H. Daus Cover: Christina Maria D. Tuguigui Layout: Mary Grace Dilag-Mojica LIST OF SPONSORS • American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines, Inc. • Australian-New Zealand Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines • Bankers Association of the Philippines • Canadian Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines • Confederation of Wearable Exporters of the Philippines • European Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines • Foundation for Economic Freedom • Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Philippines, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustaining Transit Investment in Asia's Cities
    JAKARTA Southeast-Asian-Transformation-Cover-Web.pdf 1 04/04/2019 8:41 AM JAKARTA Sustaining Transit Investment in Asia’s Cities A Beneficiary-FundingJAKARTA and Land Value Capture Perspective BANGKOKJAKARTA This report explains how proven methods of land value capture can help fund sustained urban transit investment in developing countries in Asia. It provides a primer on the importance of land value capture in urban planning and growth and identifies challenges to its use in Southeast Asian megacities like Bangkok, Jakarta, and Manila. The report combines technical analysis of land value increases arising from public mass transit investments with policy recommendations on the use of land value BANGKOKcapture mechanisms in a developing country context. JAKARTABANGKOK About the Asian Development Bank ADB is committed to achieving a prosperous, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable Asia and the Pacific, while sustaining its eorts to eradicate extreme poverty. Established in 1966, it is owned by 68 MANILAmembers—49 from the region. Its main instruments for helping its developing member countries are JAKARTA BANGKOK policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. MANILA SUSTAINING TRANSIT INVESTMENT IN ASIA’S CITIES A Beneficiary-Funding and Land Value Capture Perspective BANGKOKISBN 978-92-9261-572-7 ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City APRIL 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines 9 789292 615727 www.adb.org SUSTAINING TRANSIT INVESTMENT IN ASIA’S CITIES A Beneficiary-Funding and Land Value Capture Perspective Abdul Abiad, Kathleen Farrin, and Chris Hale Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) © 2019 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org Some rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Development & Sustainability
    Urban Development & Sustainability Comparing Metro Manila to Other Asian Cities by Sheen Sagalongos, June 2016 Urban Development & Sustainability | 2 Table of Contents Overview .................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Environmental Indicators ............................................................................................................ 4 Population Density.................................................................................................................. 4 Renewable Energy ................................................................................................................. 4 Energy Consumption .............................................................................................................. 6 Air Pollution ............................................................................................................................ 7 Waste ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Water.....................................................................................................................................10 Sanitation and Treatment ......................................................................................................11 Green Space .........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Investment Opportunities PHILIPPINES 2020 REPORT
    Green Infrastructure Investment Opportunities PHILIPPINES 2020 REPORT Supported by the ASEAN Catalytic Green Finance Facility, the Asian Development Bank and the Securities and Exchange Commission Philippines Philippines GIIO Report Climate Bonds Initiative 1 This report highlights green infrastructure investment Table of contents opportunities in the Philippines 3 SEC Foreword This report has been prepared to help tanks – in partnership with the Securities 4 ADB Foreword meet the growing demand for green and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the investment opportunities in the Philippines Philippines and the Asian Development 5 Green infrastructure: an and to support the country’s transition to a Bank (ADB). We would like to thank these opportunity for growth low carbon economy. partners along with the other organisations 6 • Snapshot: Macroeconomic outlook that contributed to the report: The Philippines It aims to facilitate greater engagement 7 • Snapshot: Infrastructure spending Department of Finance, the Public-Private on this topic between project owners and 9 • Snapshot: Climate policy Partnership Center of the Philippines; developers, and institutional investors. National Economic and Development 10 Green finance trends and Green infrastructure and corresponding Authority (NEDA), Development Bank of the opportunities green finance instruments are explored Philippines, BDO Unibank, Rizal Commercial in the report, with sector-by-sector 10 • Global demand for green is growing Banking Corporation (RCBC), Thomas Lloyd investment options
    [Show full text]
  • Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability Project March 2008
    Analysis from a Capacity Development Perspective Case Study Report on Capacity Development Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability Project Analysis from a Capacity Development Perspective Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability Project March 2008 IFIC/JICA March 2008 IIC Institute for International Cooperation JR Japan International Cooperation Agency 07-41 ISBN4-903645-76-2 Case study Report on Capacity Development Analysis from a Capacity Development Perspective Asia-Pacific Development Center on Disability Project March 2008 Institute for International Cooperation, Japan International Cooperation Agency The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views of JICA. The report is the fruit of a collaborative effort by the study group for the “CD analysis on the Asia-Pacific Development Center for Disability Project,” organized by JICA. The study reports of JICA are available in PDF format on the JICA’s website. URL: http://www.jica.go.jp/ The contents of this report may not be reprinted without permission from JICA. Published by: Research Group, Institute for International Cooperation (IFIC), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) 10-5 Ichigaya Honmura-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8433, Japan FAX: +81-3-3269-2054 E-mail: [email protected] Preface Although the term “capacity” used in “capacity development” originally refers to “ability,” the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) defines it as the ability of developing countries “to set and attain goals, and to identify
    [Show full text]
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
    ~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 . 110192018001894 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SECBuilding,EDSA,Greenhills,MandaluyongCity,MetroManila,Philippines Tel:(632) 726-0931 to 39 Fax:(632) 725-5293 Email: [email protected] Barcode Page The following document has been received: Receiving Officer/Encoder : Buen Jose Mose - COS Receiving Branch : SEC Head Office Receipt Date and Time : October 19, 2018 03:12:51 PM Received From Head Office Company Representative Doc Source I Company Information SEC Registration No. 0000167423 Company Name MEGAWORLD CORP. Industry Classification Company Type Stock Corporation Document Information Document ID 110192018001894 Document Type 17 -C (FORM 11-C:CURRENT DISCL/RPT) Document Code 17-C Period Covered October 15, 2018 No. of Days Late 0 Department CFD Remarks C06871-2018 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SEC FORM 17-C CURRENT REPORT UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE AND SRC RULE 17.2(c) THEREUNDER 1. Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) Oct 15, 2018 2. SEC Identification Number 167423 3. BIR Tax Identification No. 000-477-103 4. Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter MEGAWORLD CORPORATION 5. Province, country or other jurisdiction of incorporation Metro Manila 6. Industry Classification Code(SEC Use Only) 7. Address of principal office 30th Floor, Alliance Global Tower 36th Street cor. 11th Avenue Uptown Bonifacio, Taguig City Postal Code 1110 8. Issuer's telephone number, including area code (632) 894-6300/6400 9. Former name or former address, if changed since last report N/A 10. Securities registered pursuant to Sections 8 and 12 of the SRC or Sections 4 and 8 of the RSA Title of Each Class Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding and Amount of Debt Outstanding Common 32,239,445,872 Preferred 6,000,000,000 11.
    [Show full text]