Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 4 Volume IV Number 3 Volume IV Book 3 Article 2 1994 Panel II: Cable Versus Broadcast TV: The “Must Carry” Provisions of the Cable Television Consumer and Competition Act of 1992 Marc Apfelbaum Time Warner Cable Gregory Buscarino National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Steven J. Hyman Rosensweig & Hyman Robert D. Joffe Cravath, Swaine & Moore Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Marc Apfelbaum, Gregory Buscarino, Steven J. Hyman, and Robert D. Joffe, Panel II: Cable Versus Broadcast TV: The “Must Carry” Provisions of the Cable Television Consumer and Competition Act of 1992, 4 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 701 (1994). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/iplj/vol4/iss3/2 This Transcript is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Panel II: Cable Versus Broadcast TV: The "Must Carry" Provisions of the Cable Television Consumer and Com- petition Act of 1992 Moderator: John R. Tyler, Esq.a Panelists: Marc Apfelbaum, Esq.b Gregory Buscarino, Esq.c Steven J. Hyman, Esq.d Robert D. Joffe, Esq.e MR. TYLER: Good morning. This is the second panel. We're discussing what are known as the "must carry" provisions that were passed by Congress in 1992, pursuant to the Cable Act of that year.' I'm the moderator of this panel.