CUMBRIA FIRE & RESCUE SERVICE

Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Related Documentation

Name of Document Version No. Author(s) Date CFRS Intervention SJ Healey Standards Review 1 30.04.2010 C MacGillivray 2010 CFRS Draft 2011-14 SJ Healey 1 30.03.2010 IRMP S Pender

Document History

Notes of Changes in Version No. Author(s) Date Updated Version

Control This document is controlled and as such uncontrolled modifications of content are prohibited, revision procedures should be followed at all times.

2 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Introduction

The purpose of this Strategic Risk Review is to provide up to date details on the risks faced within our communities. Fire and Rescue Service (CFRS) operates from four geographical localities, each having its own challenges and risk. An overview of each of these localities is taken and then built upon in a more detailed review of each individual fire station area.

The individual station risk profiles detail the current operational resources available on each fire station. Details are also be provided in relation to the actual availability of these resources over a recent twelve month period. The types and number of operational responses made by the fire crews on every Fire Station is assessed and an analysis of the casualties as a result of fire or road traffic collisions has been provided. Our prevention activity in terms of the number of Home Fire Safety Visits (HFSV) carried out within each Ward area is considered and all of this information will be looked at critically in order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our operational response.

The review builds upon the outcomes from the Intervention Standards Review (www.cumbriafire. gov.uk) and details the new Super Output (SOA) risk profile for each fire station. Attached as an appendix to the review is a retrospective analysis of how the risk in Cumbria has changed since our 2006 IRMP by categorising each SOA using five years of incident data on a ‘roll forward one year’ basis.

Our average response/attendance performance to dwelling fires within each of the SOAs is analysed using nine years of incident data. By doing so we will be in a clear position to determine whether our resources are correctly placed to respond to the level of risk identified.

The station profiles also consider the actual number of dwelling fires that have occurred in each SOA between 2004/5 and 2008/9 and detail our attendance performance over this five year period. This part of the analysis concentrates on whether we managed to achieve our target attendance times against the risk categories assigned to each ward as part of our 2006 IRMP Ward classifications.

As part of any review into risk across a county as large as Cumbria, it is vital to appreciate the geographical dispersion of our fire stations and hence the proximity of the next nearest available supporting fire engines; details are therefore provided for every station and an analysis of the next nearest three fire stations in terms of the road distance and average attendance time the supporting fire engines have taken when responding to dwelling fires over a five year period.

Finally, flood risk is considered and industrial, heritage and environmental risks are taken into consideration to provide the final station risk profiles. These reviews will enable CFRS to identify resource requirements and ensure that these resources are strategically positioned around Cumbria to suitably meet the demands for our services. Furthermore, the details will be used to help inform our future prevention and protection strategies and will assist in identifying some of the actions in our 2011-14 IRMP.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 3 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Workington Locality:

CFRS Locality is situated in the North West of Cumbria and covers both parts of Borough Council and Copeland Borough Council.

The current population of the Workington Locality is estimated to be 153,952. The minority ethnic group population of Cumbria was estimated in 2007 to be 3.3% overall and the figure for the Workington Locality is probably similar with Allerdale Borough Council having an estimated 2.8% and Copeland 2.7%.

The social and economic profile of the Workington Locality is one of contrasts. In Workington and the overall profile of the towns is quite poor, with some wards such as Mirehouse, Sandwith, Moss Bay, St Michaels and Moorclose experiencing significant deprivation on a national scale with very low levels of employment, income, poor health and a poor quality living environment. In contrast in some of the outlying rural areas of the Locality there is more affluence, reasonable income and high levels of employment. However these rural areas have their own challenges of access to services and issues that relate to the number of second home owners and commuters and affordable housing for local people.

The key challenges for this area are:

For Allerdale Borough Council, to provide affordable housing, to encourage regeneration, to reduce levels of deprivation, to improve skill levels and education, to reduce crime, anti-social behaviour, to improve local transport and levels of recycling.

For Copeland Borough Council, to create a sustainable and healthy local economy, to monitor the impact of the nuclear industry, and to tackle social exclusion and deprivation.

Risks:

The majority of the incidents attended by Fire & Rescue personnel in the locality are in the Workington and Whitehaven areas. Since 2004 the Locality has attended the following incidents:

4 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

WORKINGTON Call Year Incident Type 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 Dwelling Fire 152 138 131 147 110 Building Fire 54 67 72 61 50 Other Property Fire 46 45 53 51 33 Vehicle Fire 168 181 146 103 110 Chimney Dwelling 54 54 42 40 62 Chimney Non-Dwelling 2 1 2 2 3 FAA 441 380 466 437 480 FAGI 162 173 171 194 134 FAM 51 50 45 38 26 FDR3 727 724 748 668 440 OBAT SSC-Other 251 310 145 148 186 SSC-RTC 100 110 103 102 91 Grand Total 2208 2233 2124 1991 1725

Because the Locality is a place of contrasts, the social and economic profile of the Locality in general can hide significant localised areas of increased fire risk, deprivation, poor health and disability issues together with high numbers of people living with long term limiting illness and high numbers living in socially rented accommodation. Within these areas the provision of fire prevention services is a priority, as it is for other identified vulnerable groups such as single parents, migrant workers and gypsies and travellers.

In other parts of the locality, rurality and the associated issues of the lack of affordable houses, longer travelling distances and access to services present a challenge to the Fire & Rescue Service.

Regarding communication and transport; there are a number of major roads in the locality, including the A66 which runs east to west and the A595 running north to south. The west coast train line passes through the Locality following the coast from Barrow to and there are shipping ports at Workington, Whitehaven and . Smaller harbours and marina’s are located at and Harrington.

The Locality partly comprises the Western Lakes and natural risks include a significant water risk as a result of the numbers of lakes, tarns and rivers, as well as the Solway Coast. In particular river systems in the locality have presented a significant flooding problem over the years, culminating in a 1:1000 year event occurring in the , Workington and Keswick areas in November 2009.

This area also attracts significant numbers of tourists and Keswick in particular is a holiday hotspot, with the associated numbers of large hotels and many boarding houses presenting higher levels of sleeping risk in this part of the Locality.

Much of the Locality land mass inland is made up of mountains and moorland which, as well as adding to the sense of rural isolation for many communities, also provides a significant wild land

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 5 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

fire risk. There is also wild land fire risk on the Solway Coast, a natural habitat home to many endangered species of plant and wildlife.

With regards to industrial risk, the world renowned Sellafield nuclear reprocessing facility is located in the south of the Locality and is the area’s largest employer.

In addition, there is a variety of other large scale industrial companies with sites in the Locality. In particular chemical plants are located on the A596 between Workington and Maryport and packaging manufactures are located on sites between Workington and Maryport as well as at Whitehaven and . These include:

■■ Pentagon Chemicals ■■ Iggesund Paperboard ■■ Voridian / Indorama ■■ Alcan Packaging ■■ Evonik Goldschmidt

6 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Kendal Locality:

CFRS Locality is situated in South Cumbria and covers much of and a significant proportion of Council areas. It is predominantly rural and the outstanding natural landscape covers areas in both the Lake District and the Yorkshire Dales National Parks.

The current population of the Kendal Locality is estimated to be 84,966. The Minority Ethnic Group population of Kendal was estimated in 2007 to be 3.3% overall, and the figure for the Kendal Locality is probably slightly higher, with South Lakeland having an estimated 5.7%.

In general the social and economic profile of the Kendal Locality is positive, with most areas enjoying relative affluence, reasonable income and high levels of employment. However there are issues that relate to the number of second home owners and commuters and affordable housing for local people. In addition, there are issues of rural deprivation in terms of access to services, with wards in Eden being regarded as some of the most rurally deprived areas of . Analysis of the Kendal Locality at ward level will indicate that despite a positive general picture there are pockets of deprivation, especially in Kendal and some of the most rural outlying areas.

The key challenges for this area relate mainly to its rurality including the lack of affordable housing for local people, facilitating economic growth and establishing effective transport opportunities. For the large number of older people on fixed incomes in the locality, poverty is a growing problem. People are often rich in capital but cash poor and as the cost of living increases falling into poverty, with fuel poverty being a particular concern in the winter months.

Risks:

In terms of fire risk, most activity is centred around the Kendal area. Since 2004 the Locality has attended the following incidents:

KENDAL Call Year Incident Type 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 Dwelling Fire 56 57 57 64 61 Building Fire 53 40 36 35 38 Other Property Fire 28 25 23 26 22 Vehicle Fire 56 60 62 52 45 Chimney Dwelling 48 69 41 46 60 Chimney Non-Dwelling 4 6 5 1 5 FAA 408 415 377 351 338 FAGI 73 70 71 67 93 FAM 9 20 15 17 6 FDR3 111 119 121 112 101 OBAT 3 4 4 6 4 SSC-Other 160 82 105 93 125 SSC-RTC 93 96 104 82 79 Grand Total 1102 1063 1021 952 977

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 7 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

There are a number of major roads in the Locality, including the M6, A6, A66, A65, A685, A590, A591 and A595 which present concerns in terms of road safety. Some of these roads are heavily used by motor-cyclists which present additional risks. There is also the main west-coast train line with its significant passenger and goods risks, a recent example being the derailment in 2007. In addition to the main west coast line the Settle-Carlisle route also traverses through the Locality. CFRS has attended incidents on this line in the past and it includes viaducts and numerous tunnels as well as access problems presented by its remote rural location.

There are a number of other natural considerations, such as the Lakes, a number of rivers such as the Lune, Kent and Eden (where flooding and swift water rescues have caused significant issues) and the Irish Sea coastline in the area. Morecambe Bay presents its own unique risks in terms of quicksand rescues. Large parts of the Locality fall within National Parks and it includes countless Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Special Protected Areas making the rural landscape of national importance. During dry spells the threat of wild land fire presents significant risk to the landscape and rural economy.

There also exist a number of industrial sites within the Locality boundaries. These are generally located in the towns but can also be found in more rural isolated locations. Examples of industrial risks within the Locality are:

■■ Watchgate Water Treatment Works near Kendal. The site falls within the COMAH Regulations for major industrial risks due to the large quantity of Chlorine on site. ■■ In and around Kendal there are a number of small to medium sized factories and warehouses such as James Cropper Paper Mill, Heinz Foods, Billerrud paper mill and Lakeland Ltd all presenting differing industrial risks. ■■ There is a large National Grid electricity distribution site at Old Hutton. ■■ Numerous quarries are worked in the Locality and a large Gypsum mine at Kirkby Thore.

A number of large sized hotels also exist and operate within the Locality, predominantly in the Windermere and area. Tourist numbers substantially increase the population particularly during holiday periods. The Appleby Horse Fair significantly impacts on the risk in the Locality for two weeks of the year with the influx of large numbers of gypsies and travellers, who can be vulnerable to fire risk.

There are also numerous recognised historical and heritage sites situated within the Locality. These include Levens Hall, Sizergh Castle, Appleby Castle, Blackwell, Dove Cottage, Rydal Mount, Holehird, Townend and Kendal Museum.

8 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Carlisle Locality:

CFRS Carlisle Locality is situated in the North East of Cumbria and covers entirely Carlisle District Council plus areas of Eden District Council. The rural south-western areas of the Locality form part of the Lake District National Park and the eastern Alston area is part of the Pennine Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

The current population of the Carlisle Locality is estimated to be 134,000. The Minority Ethnic Group population of Cumbria was estimated in 2007 to be 3.3% overall and the figure for the Carlisle Locality is probably similar with Carlisle District Council having an estimated 3.2%.

The social and economic profile of the Carlisle Locality is one of contrasts. In Carlisle itself the overall profile of the town is quite poor, with some wards such as Botcherby and Upperby experiencing significant deprivation on a national scale with very low levels of employment, income, poor health and a poor quality living environment. In contrast in some of the outlying rural areas of the Locality there is more affluence, reasonable income and high levels of employment.

The key challenges for this area are: For Carlisle City Council area: To tackle deprivation and increase prosperity through strengthening the local economy, revitalisation of the city centre, to expand tourism offer and to establish Carlisle as a Learning City. For the outlying rural areas including parts of Eden District Council: To overcome issues of rurality including the lack of affordable housing for local people, facilitating economic growth and establishing effective transport opportunities. For a large number of older people on fixed incomes in the locality poverty is a growing problem. People are often rich in capital but cash poor and as the cost of living increases falling into poverty, with fuel poverty being a particular concern in the winter months.

Risks:

In terms of fire risk, most activity is centred around the Carlisle City area. Since 2004 the Locality has attended the following incidents:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 9 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

CARLISLE Call Year Incident Type 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 Dwelling Fire 171 177 170 145 131 Building Fire 73 75 88 71 41 Other Property Fire 51 66 47 43 27 Vehicle Fire 243 146 147 122 116 Chimney Dwelling 52 57 40 58 89 Chimney Non-Dwelling 1 5 3 3 3 FAA 727 698 676 662 617 FAGI 178 209 162 149 150 FAM 82 70 48 45 34 FDR3 581 758 613 584 446 OBAT 4 1 3 3 SSC-Other 293 258 168 154 133 SSC-RTC 122 138 101 98 77 Grand Total 2578 2658 2266 2134 1867

In terms of other risks the runs through the Locality and beyond the border with Scotland. The A66 trunk road also runs east to west through the County. Carlisle is a main railway junction for the West Coast main railway line, Carlisle to Newcastle and Carlisle to Barrow coastal line via Maryport and Whitehaven. It also has a railway marshalling yard at Kingmoor. In addition there are also a number of other busy roads with significant road safety issues; this is compounded more within the summer months when the number of tourists visiting the Locality in particular within the Eden Valley increases. In addition there are a number of other natural considerations, such as lakes and rivers in the area, some of which have a tidal impact. In recent years Carlisle has experienced very severe local flooding.

In terms of natural risks, the Locality is home to several locations recognised as Sites of Special Scientific Interest. These are mostly situated towards the west and southern regions of the Locality and include:

■■ River Eden and its tributaries ■■ Solway Firth ■■ Whinlatter forest ■■ Eden & Irthing Gorge ■■ Lazonby Fell ■■ Gelt Woods ■■ Kielder Forest

Within Carlisle Locality there are 28 risk sites identified as requiring Site Specific Operational Intelligence. These are generally located on the outskirts of Carlisle or in one of the two industrial estates located north and south of the city although smaller engineering/industrial premises can also be found in more rural locations.

10 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Carlisle station area is home to the following major industrial risks:

■■ Pirelli Tyres, a major employer within the city engaged in the manufacture of rubber vehicle tyres for the motor industry. ■■ Nestle UK, a large scale site responsible for the manufacture and distribution of milk based products. ■■ McVities, a large scale site manufacturing biscuits for worldwide distribution. ■■ BP Dalston, responsible for the petroleum storage and distribution within the North West of the country. ■■ Lappets weaving mill, a major manufacturer of cotton and linen garments.

In addition to the above industrial risks there are also a number of heritage risk sites including Carlisle Cathedral and Carlisle Castle which also houses the county archives.

Within other parts of Carlisle Locality there are also a number of other high risk sites and industrial risks;

■■ Ministry of Defence Longtown, large scale site for the holding and distribution of munitions to the armed forces. ■■ Carlisle United Football ground ■■ Carlisle Racecourse ■■ Alba Proteins Penrith, medium sized industrial plant engaged in the processing of animal based foods. ■■ Well Well Well Lazonby, medium sized industrial processing plant for the manufacture and distribution of bottled mineral water. ■■ Carlisle Airport. Normally only open during the day, exercises by armed forces can mean troop carrying aircraft utilising the facility around the clock. ■■ Infirmary housing up to 450 patients with radiological and biological hazards. ■■ RAF Spadeadam. Large electronic warfare shooting ranges for military aircraft. Site also incorporates Centrica gas pipeline and explosive testing facility.

A number of substantially sized hotels also exist and operate within the Eden area of the Locality in particular within the areas surrounding Lake Ullswater.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 11 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Barrow Locality:

CFRS Barrow Locality is situated in the South West of Cumbria and covers entirely Barrow Borough Council plus areas of Copeland and South Lakeland District Council.

The current population of the Barrow Locality is estimated to be 113,847. The Minority Ethnic Group population of Cumbria was estimated in 2007 to be 3.3% overall and the figure for the Barrow Locality is similar with Barrow Borough Council having 3.1%.

The social and economic profile of the Barrow Locality is one of contrasts. In Barrow itself the overall profile of the town is poor, with some wards such as Hindpool and Central experiencing significant deprivation on a national scale with very low levels of employment, income, poor health and a poor quality living environment. In contrast in some of the outlying rural areas of the Locality there is more affluence, reasonable income and high levels of employment.

The key challenges for this area are:

For Barrow Borough Council area: To increase prosperity through regeneration, increased enterprise and a broadening of the economic base and to reduce the number of benefit claimants in the Borough. To increase the “liveability” of the area through reducing anti-social behaviours, perceptions of crime and tackling issues such as dog fouling and littering.

For the outlying rural areas: To overcome issues of rurality including the lack of affordable housing for local people, facilitating economic growth and establishing effective transport opportunities.

Risks:

In terms of fire risk, most activity is centred around the BarrowTown area. Since 2004 the Locality has attended the following incidents:

12 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

BARROW Call Year Incident Type 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 Dwelling Fire 114 112 116 112 101 Building Fire 68 94 86 89 76 Other Property Fire 36 27 47 20 29 Vehicle Fire 59 72 52 34 56 Chimney Dwelling 42 54 33 62 53 Chimney Non- 6 5 6 6 5 Dwelling FAA 467 512 512 452 512 FAGI 98 115 118 140 112 FAM 29 45 25 19 21 FDR3 421 448 470 389 304 OBAT SSC-Other 318 140 207 183 148 SSC-RTC 45 50 53 57 51 Grand Total 1703 1674 1725 1563 1468

For the Locality, the social and economic profile of the area indicates significant areas of increased fire risk, deprivation, poor health and disability issues, high numbers of long term limiting illness and high numbers of people living in socially rented accommodation. In addition, the provision of Fire Prevention services to other vulnerable groups such as single parents, migrant workers, gypsy and travellers is important. For the rural areas, ensuring preventative Fire Services for those living in remote and isolated areas presents a challenge for the service.

There are a number of major roads in the Locality, including the A590, A591 and A595 which present concerns in terms of road safety. There is the west-coast train line that follows the Furness Coast. In addition, there are a number of other natural considerations, such as Lakes, a number of rivers (where flooding has caused significant issues) and the Irish Sea coastline in the area.

There also exist a number of large scale industrial sites within the Locality boundaries. These are generally located either within or adjacent to the urban centres of Barrow and although smaller engineering/industrial premises can also be found in more rural locations. Barrow station area is home to the following major industrial risks;

■■ BAE Marine Systems, a major employer within the town, building Nuclear Powered Submarines and land based armament capabilities for the MOD. ■■ Kimberley Clark, a large scale site responsible for the manufacture and distribution of tissue based products. ■■ Centrica Energy HRL a large scale operation situated on the outskirts of the town, comprising three on-shore terminals, responsible for the collection, refinement and distribution of Natural Gas that is piped ashore from Morecambe Bay. Linked with this operation are the Centrica Energy Power Station at Roosecote and the Gas Condensate Storage facility sited at Ramsden Dock. ■■ PNTL( Nuclear Fuel Transport) Berth situated at Ramsden Dock , where Nuclear Fuel is

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 13 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

loaded for transportation via rail to/from Sellafield. ■■ Robert McBride Group, a medium sized factory producing a variety of soap powder products. ■■ CCW Ltd, another medium sized factory mass producing wax candles.

Sited on the outskirts of Ulverston is the Glaxosmithkline factory where a range of pharmaceuticals are produced. This facility has seen some degree of downsizing in recent years. In addition a number of factories exist in the station area covering a variety of manufacturing processes including the production of subsea power/data connection systems used throughout the global oil and gas industry and high tech electronic equipment.

In the station area is sited HM Prison , able to accommodate over 600 male prisoners of class C category. In addition, sited near to Bootle is the MOD Eskmeals an ammunition testing facility occupying a large swathe of land adjacent to the Irish Sea coastline.

A number of substantially sized hotels also exist and operate within the Locality, predominantly in the Grange area.

In terms of natural risks, the Locality is home to several locations recognised as Sites of Special Scientific Interest. These are mostly situated on or near to the coastline at the Duddon Estuary, Sandscale Haws, Sea wood near Bardsea, Bigland Mosses, Cavendish Dock in Barrow and Morecambe Bay itself. A further two are sited inland at Yewbarrow woods and Subberthwaite. In addition, there are a upwards of a dozen sites that are recognised for their natural habitat and are overseen by Cumbria Wildlife Trust, the National Trust, RSPB or Natural Nature reserves.

There are a number of recognised Heritage sites situated within the Locality. These range from the historic ruins of Furness Abbey in Barrow, to the stately home and gardens at Holker Hall and the Priory at Cartmel. Additionally, there is the industrial heritage Bobbin Mill site at Stott Park on the western side of Lake Windermere, the recognised ‘birthplace’ of the Quaker movement at Swarthmoor Hall near Ulverston, and Brantwood house near Coniston, all of which attract visitors due to their historical values.

14 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Individual Station Risk Review / Profiles

The next section assesses the specific performance and risk within each of our existing Fire Station areas. It builds on the more defined risk profiling down to SOA level and provides information in relation to anticipated response performance to each of the SOAs.

The risk profiling process by its very nature provides evidence of the fire risk within each geographical SOA using detailed known risk and demographic information. The risk formula used to inform our new risk profile was devised following the Intervention Standards Review (www. cumbriafire.gov.uk). We have also carried out a Station by Station analysis to identify other significant risks in the area that need consideration so that our resources are appropriately allocated across the County.

Risks that have been analysed within each station area include:

Heritage Risk: We have analysed the Heritage Risks within each Station Area by cross mapping information provided from English Heritage, the National Trust, Cumbria’s Historic Environment Records Department and the Lake District National Park Historic Environment Record. For each station area we have listed all known World Heritage Sites, National Trust sites, Registered Parks and Gardens and Grade I and II* listed buildings. Grade I listings are reserved for buildings of international stature and, in all only 2.5% of buildings in the country are so designated. Those graded II* are defined as ‘outstanding’ and comprise 5.5% of present national listings and hence we should do all we can to improve our strategic planning and protection of these significant structures.

Environment Risk: We have assessed each Station area and listed all Special Areas of Conservation. We have also identified the number of Sites of Specific Scientific Interest (SSSI) in each area and listed Natural Nature Reserves. We will use the information to develop our prevention, protection and response strategies in order to reduce the likelihood and severity of incidents involving these precious environmental areas.

Site Specific Risks: Using our Operational Intelligence Register we have been able to identify all existing ‘Category 3’ risk sites in each Station Area. These risks include industrial buildings and other significant life risk premises.

Flooding Risks: We have liaised with the Environment Agency in order to identify those areas in Cumbria that are most at risk of flooding. We have also analysed historical incident data and by doing so are in a position to identify individual Station areas where we need to consider improved training and resource allocation to mitigate the impact of these adverse events.

Rurality: In Cumbria we are all too aware of the significant impact on communities in terms of service provision due to rurality and limited infrastructure supporting our most remote population areas. We have used the DEFRA urban/rural classifications in order to identify the level of rurality within each station boundary.

The Station risk profiles also provide an analysis of incident activity and review how effective our prevention strategies have been by identifying Fire and Road Traffic Collision related casualties by Ward Area.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 15 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Workington Resources

Workington Fire Station is situated on King Street on the west side of the town, approximately half a mile from the recently refurbished town centre which has seen a large increase in the number and size of retailers operating in the town. A new Fire Station will be built on Moorclose as part of a joint North West Fire and Rescue Authority Public Finance Initiative (PFI) project. The new site will provide better response to the increased risk areas of Moorclose and Moss Bay.

There are 26 whole time firefighters, including four crew managers, on a four-watch duty system who provide 24 hour cover based on the conventional 2-2-4 shift system. The station has additional cover provided by 15 retained firefighters.

The station houses two fire engines (1 regular crewed; 1 retained crewed) which are equipped with rescue equipment to provide a quick response to road traffic collisions (RTCs)and line rescue equipment to facilitate rescues from confined spaces. The third appliance is a Major Rescue Vehicle (MRV), which carries additional equipment to facilitate rescues involving large goods vehicles involved in RTCs. Also carried is a boat for water rescues with associated equipment and rescue equipment for the release of large animals.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Workington Retained Appliance had been off the run on 35 separate occasions for a combined total of 109 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Workington fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Types 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 8 11 5 7 8 39 FAA 135 110 101 97 115 558 FAGI 51 47 36 45 38 217 FAM 26 20 21 11 12 90 FDR3 360 319 265 232 168 1344 Dwelling Fire 66 72 62 73 46 319 Other Building Fire 29 27 31 28 30 145 Other Property Fire 19 18 21 12 15 85 Vehicle Fire 64 72 52 32 33 253 SSC Other 45 31 34 48 51 209 SSC RTC Related 24 31 29 27 42 153 Grand Total 827 758 657 612 558 3412

16 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by Ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First

Clifton MEDIUM 691 2 9 17 0 1 3 245 19 35.46 Harrington MEDIUM 1366 2 20 131 0 0 1 314 28 22.99 Moorclose HIGH 2254 0 4 28 1 2 4 920 64 40.82 Moss Bay HIGH 2346 0 8 93 2 3 19 1353 123 57.67 St John's MEDIUM 2600 0 18 127 0 1 1 536 57 20.62 St HIGH 2637 0 13 178 0 3 4 724 51 27.46 Michael's Seaton MEDIUM 2240 1 12 54 0 2 4 571 57 25.49 Stainburn LOW 726 0 8 19 0 2 0 142 6 19.56

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 17 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Response Standard (seconds) 1st Average response time to dwelling fires 2001-09 (seconds) Average

E01019089 16UBGS Clifton 50 M 600 454 M 8 3 5 E01019100 16UBHB Harrington 26 L 900 446 M 5 1 4 E01019101 16UBHB Harrington 22 L 900 413 M 3 3 E01019108 16UBHF Moorclose 48 M 600 257 H 13 2 11 E01019109 16UBHF Moorclose 56 M 600 268 H 14 4 10 E01019110 16UBHF Moorclose 60 M 600 217 H 15 2 2 11 E01019111 16UBHG Moss Bay 72 M 600 295 H 17 2 5 10 E01019112 16UBHG Moss Bay 86 H 300 354 H 18 1 15 2 E01019113 16UBHG Moss Bay 92 H 300 251 H 29 4 4 21 E01019116 16UBHJ St John's 48 M 600 152 M 9 1 8 E01019117 16UBHJ St John's 20 L 900 150 M 2 2 E01019118 16UBHJ St John's 30 L 900 201 M 5 5 E01019119 16UBHJ St John's 16 L 900 198 M 3 3 E01019120 16UBHK St Michael's 28 L 900 249 H 7 2 5 E01019121 16UBHK St Michael's 56 M 600 225 H 13 3 10 E01019122 16UBHK St Michael's 68 M 600 269 H 9 3 6 E01019123 16UBHL Seaton 40 M 600 384 M 9 9 E01019124 16UBHL Seaton 16 L 900 253 M 2 2 E01019125 16UBHL Seaton 28 L 900 384 M 4 4 E01019129 16UBHP Stainburn 28 L 900 202 L 1 1

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Workington Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Workington:

18 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Whitehaven 02P2 11 min 00s 7.79 Whitehaven 02P1 20 min 13s Maryport 08P1 8 min 39s 6.20 Maryport 08P2 7 min 10s Cockermouth 04P1 8.08 15 min 6s

Other contextual information

The coastal town of Workington is situated on the west coast of Cumbria and is largely an industrial town with a population of around 25,000. The main industries in the town include the production of carton board (Iggesund Paperboard), Chemical Plants (Voridian UK & Pentagon chemicals), and many other industrial factories and units.

Workington Risk in station area Grade I listed: Branthwaite Hall, Braithwaite Church of St Oswald, Dean Workington Hall, Workington Grade II* listed: Heritage Crakeplace Hall, Ullock Helena Thompson Museum and former stables Church of St John and adjoining parish room Church of St Michael St Michael's House Environment 1 Site of Specific Scientific Interest Pentagon Chemicals Specialties Ltd Voridian England Ltd Alcan Packaging Lawson Mardon Packaging Ltd Port Of Workington Camtex Fabrics Ltd New Balance Athletic Shoes (Uk) Ltd Site Specific Risks West Cumbria College Alco Waste Management Cumbria Waste Management Ltd Past Times/Stobarts/ Workington Community Hospital Derwent Park Borough Park Lostrigg Beck often causes flooding to communities in the Bridgefoot area Flooding: and Workington was affected by the severe flooding to the County in 2009. Of the 20 Super Output Areas that make up Workington 18 are designated Rurality “Urban” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 2 “Village and Hamlet”.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 19 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Activity by time of day

Emergency response activity at Workington Fire Station varies immensely depending on the time of day:

Workington Appliances - all incidents attended in 8 hour blocks 01.04.2004 - 31.03.2009 2500

2000

1500

1000 Number of Incidents 500

0 1-9pm 1-9am 2-10pm 3-11pm 2-10am 3-11am 5pm-1am 6pm-2am 7pm-3am 8pm-4am 9pm-5am 5am-1pm 6am-2pm 7am-3pm 8am-4pm 9am-5pm 4-Midnight 10pm-6am 11pm-7am 10am-6pm 11am-7pm 12noon-8pm 4am-12noon Midnight-8am

P1 Incidents in 8 hour period P2 Incidents in 8 hour period

Workington Appliances - all incidents attended in 12 hour blocks 01.04.2004 - 31.03.2009 3000

2500

2000

1500

1000 Number of Incidents

500

0 0-Noon 1am-1pm 2am-2pm 3am-3pm 4am-4pm 5am-5pm 6am-6pm 7am-7pm 8am-8pm 9am-9pm 1pm-1am 2pm-2am 3pm-3am 4pm-4am 5pm-5am 6pm-6am 7pm-7am 8pm-8am 9pm-9am 10am-10pm 11am-11pm 12am-12pm 10pm-10am 11pm-11am

P1 Incidents in 12 hour period P2 Incidents in 12 hour period

The total incidents attended by the station crews have significantly declined during the last five year period of analysis. Calls to anti social rubbish fires have shown a considerable drop (more than 50% reduction since 2004/5). Calls to Road Traffic Collisions (RTCs) have seen an increase in 2008/9 but dwelling fires are now at their lowest levels for many years.There are 2 Super Output Areas classified as ‘high’ risk (both in Moss Bay) in terms of likely fire related incidents and associated casualties, with the majority of Workington classed as ‘medium’ and ‘low’ risk. There are some heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary, as well as some significant industrial risks.

20 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Whitehaven Resources

The fire station, situated in Hensingham, is approximately 1.5 miles from the town centre.There are 24 regular firefighters, including four crew managers, working the conventional 2-2-4 (four watch) duty system and who provide 24 hour cover. The station has additional cover provided by 12 retained firefighters.

The station houses two fire engines (1 regular crewed; 1 retained crewed) which are additionally equipped with rescue equipment providing a quick response to road traffic collisions. The third appliance is a Multi Purpose Vehicle which has a variety of county wide operational functions including foam production, environmental protection and rural fire fighting and is crewed on demand only.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Whitehaven Retained Appliance had been off the run on 101 separate occasions for a combined total of 315 hours and 15 minutes.

Activity

Whitehaven fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas:

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 8 5 5 4 12 34 FAA 126 120 168 149 188 751 FAGI 60 46 74 63 41 284 FAM 22 18 16 9 3 68 FDR3 131 131 175 135 85 657 Dwelling Fire 89 54 58 62 50 313 Other Building Fire 27 25 21 19 10 102 Other Property Fire 11 8 10 14 7 50 Vehicle Fire 38 37 33 21 29 158 SSC Other 47 29 33 34 39 182 SSC RTC Related 35 25 20 29 18 127 Grand Total 594 498 613 539 482 2726

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 21 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

Ward Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire 2006/10 IRMP Risk 2006/10 IRMP Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First

Arlecdon LOW 702 1 11 66 0 0 0 83 4 11.82 Bransty MEDIUM 2103 1 10 65 0 0 0 428 30 20.35 Distington MEDIUM 1826 1 20 107 1 8 2 674 79 36.91 Harbour HIGH 2210 0 15 155 0 3 8 543 34 24.57 Hensingham MEDIUM 1936 0 8 136 0 1 1 575 43 29.70 Hillcrest LOW 1060 0 2 5 0 0 0 282 19 26.60 Kells MEDIUM 1149 0 5 33 0 2 0 342 17 29.77 Mirehouse HIGH 1904 0 5 49 0 2 5 891 76 46.80 Moresby LOW 531 0 7 29 0 0 1 105 8 19.77 St Bees LOW 794 1 2 35 0 2 0 220 7 27.71 Sandwith HIGH 1275 0 2 33 1 1 2 458 24 35.92

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

22 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA RISK CATEGORY 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard (seconds) Appliance 1st Average response time to dwelling fires 2001-09 Average

E01019256 16UEGD Arlecdon 24 L 900 382 L 1 1 E01019260 16UEGG Bransty 30 L 900 394 M 4 4 E01019261 16UEGG Bransty 16 L 900 335 M 2 2 E01019262 16UEGG Bransty 18 L 900 396 M 5 5 E01019268 16UEGK Distington 60 M 600 515 M 4 1 3 E01019269 16UEGK Distington 54 M 600 470 M 7 1 6 E01019270 16UEGK Distington 36 M 600 417 M 8 2 1 5 E01019280 16UEGR Harbour 92 H 300 357 H 28 1 24 3 E01019281 16UEGR Harbour 26 L 900 300 H 5 2 3 E01019282 16UEGR Harbour 58 M 600 447 H 7 2 5 16UEGT E01019284 38 M 600 217 M 11 2 9 Hensingham 16UEGT E01019285 42 M 600 253 M 9 9 Hensingham 16UEGT E01019286 28 L 900 179 M 3 3 Hensingham E01019287 16UEGU Hillcrest 16 L 900 321 L 2 2 E01019288 16UEGU Hillcrest 16 L 900 209 L 2 2 E01019291 16UEGX Kells 36 M 600 426 M 9 1 1 7 E01019292 16UEGX Kells 24 L 900 426 M 1 1 E01019294 16UEGZ Mirehouse 42 M 600 361 H 9 1 5 3 E01019295 16UEGZ Mirehouse 66 M 600 351 H 11 5 6 E01019296 16UEGZ Mirehouse 44 M 600 256 H 9 1 1 7 E01019297 16UEHA Moresby 24 L 900 360 L 3 3 E01019300 16UEHC St Bees 26 L 900 631 L 7 2 5 E01019301 16UEHD Sandwith 68 M 600 452 H 21 21 E01019302 16UEHD Sandwith 42 M 600 437 H 1 1

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 23 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Whitehaven Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Whitehaven:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Frizington 06P1 3.86 9min 43s Egremont 05P1 4.77 12min 29s Workington 01P2 7.79 11min 53s

Other contextual information

The historic Georgian town of Whitehaven is situated on the west coast of Cumbria and centres on a newly refurbished marina, which continues to develop. Whitehaven has a population of 26,000 people with the main local employer being the British Nuclear Group at Sellafield.

24 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Whitehaven: Risk in station area Grade I listed: Moresby Hall, Moresby Cross in churchyard to north of Priory Church nave, St Bees , Music room in former chancel to Priory Church of St Mary, St Bees Church of St Mary & St Bega, St Bees Wall, to west of Priory Church nave, incorporating medieval cross & lintel, St Bees Church of St James, Whitehaven Heritage Grade II* listed: Rosehill, house & adjoining wall, Moresby Pow Bridge over Pow Beck, St Bees Manor Stead & house adjoining to north, St Bees Nether End Farmhouse, Weddicar No 14 Scotch Street, Whitehaven No 52 (Somerset House) Duke Street, Whitehaven No 151, including area railings Queen Street, Whitehaven Nos 44 & 45 Roper Street, Whitehaven Barracks Mill, Catherine Street Whitehaven Special Area of Conservation: River Ehen (NY031144) Environment 2 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest West Cumberland Hospital Site Specific Risks Moorehouse Building & Civil Engineering Co Princes Royal Building W Lakes Moor Row Flood Risk: The town centre of Whitehaven is in a low lying valley, with a steep sided catchment containing numerous watercourses, most of which flow into the harbour via Pow Beck. Whitehaven suffered severe flooding on 5th November 1999, as the result of localised torrential rain. A total of 275 properties were flooded and 86 damaged as a result. During high tides, the Market Place has flooded frequently as water flowing into the harbour has backed up and surcharged road gullies Flooding in the area. Coach Road floods on a regular basis, due to capacity problems with sewers and Pow Beck. Mirehouse also experiences flooding from Pow Beck and localised drainage issues. In total there are approximately 1450 people in 606 properties at risk, along with key infrastructure such as Main Copeland Borough Council Offices at Catherine Street and Electricity Sub Stations at Strand Street, Recreation Ground, Newlands Avenue and Meadow Road. Of the 24 Super Output Areas that make up Whitehaven 19 are Rurality designated “Urban” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications, 1 “Town and Fringe” and 4 “Village and Hamlet”

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 25 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Activity by time of day

Activity on the station varies immensely depending on the time of day:

Whitehaven Appliances - all incidents attended in 8 hour blocks 01.04.2004 - 31.03.2009 1600

1400

1200

1000

800

600 Number of Incidents 400

200

0 1-9pm 1-9am 2-10pm 3-11pm 2-10am 3-11am 5pm-1am 6pm-2am 7pm-3am 8pm-4am 9pm-5am 5am-1pm 6am-2pm 7am-3pm 8am-4pm 9am-5pm 4-Midnight 10pm-6am 11pm-7am 10am-6pm 11am-7pm 12noon-8pm 4am-12noon Midnight-8am

P2 Incidents in 8 hour period P1 Incidents in 8 hour period

Whitehaven Appliances - all incidents attended in 12 hour blocks 01.04.2004 - 31.03.2009 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800

Number of Incidents 600 400 200 0 0-Noon 1am-1pm 2am-2pm 3am-3pm 4am-4pm 5am-5pm 6am-6pm 7am-7pm 8am-8pm 9am-9pm 1pm-1am 2pm-2am 3pm-3am 4pm-4am 5pm-5am 6pm-6am 7pm-7am 8pm-8am 9pm-9am 10am-10pm 11am-11pm 12am-12pm 10pm-10am 11pm-11am

P2 Incidents in 12 hour period P1 Incidents in 12 hour period

Property fires are at their lowest levels for many years and calls to TCsR are also declining (both incident types have seen a reduction by some 50% since 2004/5). There are a number of heritage and environmental risks covered by the station and parts of the Town are susceptible to flooding. In terms of fire risk, there is one small pocket that is classed as ‘high’ risk (part of Harbour Ward), with the majority of the Town made up from ‘medium’ and ‘low’ risk SOAs.

26 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Aspatria Resources

The station is located in the town centre on the main road through the town and is staffed by 15 retained firefighters. The Station houses one fire engine, which is equipped with rescue equipment to provide a quick response to road traffic collisions.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Appliance had been off the run on 3 separate occasions for a combined total of 14 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Aspatria’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 6 8 4 4 8 30 FAA 24 17 20 26 19 106 FAGI 4 5 5 7 5 26 FAM 1 1 FDR3 11 3 14 2 5 35 Dwelling Fire 11 6 7 3 5 32 Other Building Fire 6 6 16 4 6 38 Other Property Fire 6 2 2 1 2 13 Vehicle Fire 4 3 5 3 3 18 SSC Other 11 8 3 5 9 36 SSC RTC Related 13 15 10 13 8 59 Grand Total 96 73 86 69 70 394

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 27 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Home Safety Visit Road Traffic Collisions Fires Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First

Aspatria MEDIUM 1545 1 6 40 0 1 1 205 15 13.27 Boltons LOW 871 3 15 90 0 0 3 44 5.05 Wharrels LOW 675 7 18 48 1 0 0 75 3 11.11

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New SOA Risk Average performance (2004/5 - 1st response 2008/9) Appliance SOA time to WARD Attendance NUMBER RISK 2010 dwelling fires Standard SCORE SOA Risk 2001-09 Total Total

(seconds) Failed Passed

(2005-10) Category (seconds) Excluded Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP 2006 IRMP

16UBGN E01019081 48 M 600 498 M 8 1 7 Aspatria 16UBGN E01019082 24 L 900 597 M 3 2 1 Aspatria 16UBGP E01019083 46 M 600 954 L 7 5 2 Boltons 16UBHT E01019133 22 L 900 705 L 3 3 Wharrels

28 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Aspatria Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Aspatria:

Distance by Road Station Name Average attendance time (MILES) Maryport 08P1 19 min 06s 7.86 Maryport 08P2 23min 18s Wigton 11P1 8.44 15min 05s Cockermouth 04P1 8.81 14min 01s

Other contextual information

Aspatria is a small town in West Cumbria situated approximately half way between the west coast and , with a population of approximately 3,500 people. The main employer in the town is the Sealy bed manufacturer and Dairy Crest producing dairy products. The main risk within the Station area are associated with the two busy trunk roads, the A596 which runs through the town, and the near by A595. These roads are busy with both commuter and transport traffic, along with slow moving agricultural traffic. This all equates to a high risk for road traffic collisions in the area. Other risks are associated with the large number of agricultural premises. Open farmland brings the danger of barn fires, heath and moor land fires, as well as livestock rescues.

Aspatria: Risk in station area: Grade I listed: Harby Brow Tower, adjoining farmhouse and barn, Allhallows Church of St Mungo, Bromfield Hayton Castle, Hayton Whitehall, Mealsgate Heritage Church of St Michael, Torpenhow Grade II* listed: Church of St Kentigern, Aspatria Church of St Mary, Gilcrux Weary Hall, Mealsgate Dovecote south of Church of St Cuthbert, Parsonby Environment 2 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks No significant Site Specific Risks identified within the Station area The Station has attended numerous rescues of persons from vehicles trapped in flood water on the roads in and around the Flooding Town (B5301, Arkleby, Plumbland). Flooding has also affected domestic properties in some of the smaller local villages (Arkleby, Measgate and Baggrow in recent years) Of the Super Output Areas 2 are designated “Town and Fringe” Rurality according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 2 are “Village Hamlets”

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 29 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 70 – 80 per annum, with no significant trends over recent years. The Station area is predominantly medium and low in terms of likely fire risk but it does have some heritage and environmental risks to consider.

30 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Cockermouth Resources

A new fire station was opened in 2002 and is situated adjacent to Cumbria Fire and Rescue Service Headquarters site on Station road, approximately a quarter of mile from the town centre. The station is staffed by 13 retained firefighters. The Station houses one fire engine, which is equipped with rescue equipment to provide a quick response to road traffic collisions. The station also houses the Service’s Mobile Control Unit which is mobilised to larger incidents where it can provide a control point for the management of the incident.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Cockermouth Appliance had been off the run on 62 separate occasions for a combined total of 166 hours.

Activity

Cockermouth fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended will have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 4 5 4 1 11 25 FAA 32 34 29 31 33 159 FAGI 7 13 6 13 5 44 FAM 2 2 4 FDR3 9 29 25 19 18 100 Dwelling Fire 5 9 8 11 5 38 Other Building Fire 7 8 5 9 2 31 Other Property Fire 3 3 3 1 10 Vehicle Fire 8 4 6 5 5 28 SSC Other 10 8 7 7 7 39 SSC RTC Related 18 15 14 8 6 61 Grand Total 103 130 107 107 92 539

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 31 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity 2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts in ward Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire % First visits Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC Fire Slight ll Saints LOW 2178 0 3 16 0 0 0 272 19 12.49 Broughton St LOW 1811 3 21 97 0 2 0 189 16 10.44 Bridget's Christchurch LOW 1801 0 1 33 0 0 1 272 17 15.10 Crummock LOW 769 2 12 122 1 1 0 69 4 8.97 Dalton LOW 822 2 20 68 0 1 0 81 7 9.85

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Average Dwelling Fire response Risk 1st response performance (2004/5 - 2008/9) Appliance time to WARD Attendance dwelling Standard fires Total Total Failed Passed SOA NUMBER SOA Category (seconds) 2001-09 Excluded (2005-10) Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE

2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA (seconds)

E01019078 16UBGM All Saints 16 L 900 386 L E01019079 16UBGM All Saints 20 L 900 445 L 4 4 E01019080 16UBGM All Saints 30 L 900 450 L 3 3 16UBGQ Broughton St 01019084 24 L 900 598 L 4 4 Bridget's 16UBGQ Broughton St E01019085 16 L 900 570 L 3 3 Bridget's 16UBGQ Broughton St E01019086 16 L 900 611 L 3 3 Bridget's E01019087 16UBGR Christchurch 16 L 900 455 L 5 1 4 E01019088 16UBGR Christchurch 44 M 600 386 L 8 8 E01019090 16UBGT Crummock 28 L 900 1259 L 4 1 3 E01019091 16UBGU Dalton 28 L 900 573 L 1 1

32 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Cockermouth Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Cockermouth:

Station Name Distance by Road (miles) Average attendance time Workington 01P2 8.08 12min 25s Workington 01P1 14min 29s Maryport 08P1 7.08 13min 07s Maryport 08P2 12min 04s Aspatria 03P1 8.81 21min 58s

Other contextual information

Cockermouth is a busy market town situated just outside the boundary of the Lake District National Park, between the western lakes and the industrial west coast. Cockermouth has a thriving tourist trade with its links to William Wordsworth, art galleries, working brewery and castle amongst many attractions and has an exclusive conservation area within the town and numerous listed buildings/ structures.

Cockermouth has a population of around 8,000 and the main local employment being Walkers, a gasket manufacture and the local livestock auction company Mitchell's. The infrastructure means hotels, residential homes, garages and shops make up the rest of the area except for the domestic housing stock, which covers the full range from brand new complexes, to farms, and churches that have been on site since the middle ages.

The busy A66 and A595 trunk roads which merge at Cockermouth, have a high risk of road traffic collisions with the potential for very serious incidents due to the number of chemical tankers that supply the west Cumbrian coast. Other risks in the area are associated with the large number of agricultural premises. Open farmland brings the danger of barn fires, heath and moor land fires, as well as livestock rescues.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 33 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Cockermouth: Risk in station area:

Grade I listed: Isel Hall, Isel Church of St Michael, Isel Church of St Bridget, Brigham Cockermouth Castle: uninhabited parts, residence of Lord Egremont, Outer Gatehouse (including Pump inside Outer Gatehouse), Eastern range of buildings (Lord Egremont's Estate Office and the office of the Westmorland Green Slate Company), Southern range of buildings, adjoining the Flag Tower (including garages, store rooms and Castle Cottage) Wordsworth House including - Garden and forecourt walling and gate piers, Heritagev Cockermouth Grade II* listed: Parsonage Farmhouse, Brigham Nos 45 & 47 Kirkgate (including cobbled forecourt), Cockermouth Nos 5,6,7 Castlegate, Cockermouth Castlegate House, Cockermouth Nos 38, 40 and 42, Market Place, Cockermouth No 71, Norham House, Main Street, Cockermouth Table Tomb (Church of St Michael), Isel Hewthwaite Hall, Setmurthy, Cockermouth Special Areas of Conservation: Clints Quarry, Moota (NY161357), Bassenthwaite Environment (NY 262207) Plus 5 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks No significant Site Specific Risks identified within the Station area Flood Risk: The Town is the localtion where two large rivers merge (The Cocker and The Derwent) and this has resulted in major flooding in the past, none more so than in 2009 when an unprecidented level of rainfall fell and led to a major emergency requiring the rescue of persons from hundreds of homes in and adjacent to the Town Centre. The Flood Risk Area covers an urban area of some 0.77 square kilometers with Flooding almost 600 properties at risk. The Town was subject to a 1 in 100 year flooding event in 2005, with the main source of flooding caused by the River Derwent overtopping its defences. However, this event was dramatically superseded in 2009 when a 1 in 1000 year flooding event, caused by the highest level of rainfall ever to fall in a 24 hour period since records began, devestated the Town as the Rivers Cocker and Derwent broke their Banks and placed the entire Town Centre under water. Of the 10 Super Output Areas in Cockermouth 7 are designated “Town and Fringe” Rurality according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 3 are “Village Hamlet”

Conclusion Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 100 per annum, with a reduction seen in property fires in recent years. The Station area is classed as predominantly ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have one small ‘medium’ risk SOA in Christchurch and also some significant heritage and environmental risks to consider. Flooding is also a serious consideration and in recent years this has resulted in some major rescue operations.

34 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Egremont Resources

The station has one fire engine and is situated on Chapel Street.There are currently 13 retained firefighters crewing the station.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Egremont Appliance had been off the run on 106 separate occasions for a combined total of 240 hours and 45 minutes.

Activity

Egremont’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 4 2 4 3 1 14 FAA 8 10 14 18 15 65 FAGI 8 15 7 8 7 45 FAM 1 1 3 1 2 8 FDR3 19 19 23 48 22 131 Dwelling Fire 7 6 8 10 12 43 Other Building Fire 3 5 1 4 13 Other Property Fire 2 1 1 1 3 8 Vehicle Fire 5 10 5 2 5 27 SSC Other 6 5 4 5 6 26 SSC RTC Related 5 5 7 6 4 27 Grand Total 68 79 77 106 77 407

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 35 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity 2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts in ward Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire % First visits Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC Fire Slight Beckermet LOW 1350 1 11 85 0 0 0 162 14 12.00 Egremont MEDIUM 1922 4 10 115 4 2 5 369 35 19.20 North Egremont LOW 1805 0 6 74 0 3 2 307 48 17.01 South New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

WARD (seconds) 10) Risk Total Total Failed Passed SOA NUMBER SOA Excluded Category Standard (seconds) 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA Average response time Average 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP to dwelling fires 2001-09 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st RISK SCORE (2005-

16UEGE E01019257 32 L 900 665 L 3 3 Beckermet 16UEGE E01019258 16 L 900 761 L 2 2 Beckermet 16UEGL Egremont E01019271 36 M 600 407 M 4 4 North 16UEGL Egremont E01019272 64 M 600 412 M 8 8 North 16UEGL Egremont E01019273 48 M 600 378 M 5 5 North 16UEGM E01019274 38 M 600 399 L 4 4 Egremont South 16UEGM E01019275 24 L 900 416 L 5 5 Egremont South

36 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Egremont Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Egremont:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Whitehaven 02P1 4.77 14min 18s Whitehaven 02P2 11min 05s Frizington 06P1 5.02 16min 31s Seascale 09P1 8.93 14min 05s Other contextual information

Egremont is situated in the Copeland District of Cumbria with a population of approximately 7,800 people. Within the station area is the main A595 trunk road, the BNG Sellafield nuclear plant, five junior schools and one secondary school. There are also two elderly person homes within the town itself.

Egremont: Risk in station area: Grade I listed: Egremont Castle Calder Abbey, (including ruins of the Monastic Church and east range; House, incorporating monastic ruins and courtyard buildings adjoining to the east), St Bridget Beckermet Grade II* listed: Heritage Gatehouse range to south of Haile Hall, Haile Gatehouse to Calder Abbey, St Bridget Beckermet The Monks’ Oven, Calder Abbey, St Bridget Beckermet Haile Hall, Haile Pelham House, Ponsonby Church of St Bridget, St Bridget Beckermet Environment 5 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks BNG Sellafield Nuclear Plant Flood Risk: Egremont is situated on the River Ehen, which rises in the Western Lake District above Ennerdale Water before flowing in a predominately westerly/south-westerly direction. The catchment exhibits a fast, flashy response to rainfall with the Flood Risk Area covering part of Egremont Flooding adjacent to the River Ehen between Briscoe Mill to the north and Ennerdale Mill to the south of the town. There are approximately 310 properties at risk. Low Mill is a small hamlet in the River Ehen downstream of Egremont and has a flood risk area placing approximately 10 properties at risk. Of the 7 Super Output Areas that make up Egremont 5 are designated “Town Rurality and Fringe” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 2 are “Village Hamlet”

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 37 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 70 – 80 per annum, with a gradual increase in reported dwelling fires over recent years. The Station area is classed as ‘low’ and ‘medium’ in terms of likely fire risk and it does have some heritage and environmental risks to consider. Flooding is also a problem to parts of the town and the main significant nuclear risk presented by BNG Sellafield Nuclear Plant.

38 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Frizington Resources

The station has one fire engine and is situated on Main Street. There are currently 13 retained firefighters crewing the station.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Frizington Appliance had been off the run on 31 separate occasions for a combined total of 64 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Frizington’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended will have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 3 4 2 1 2 12 FAA 8 4 5 7 2 26 FAGI 3 1 3 6 5 18 FAM 2 4 1 7 FDR3 15 25 13 22 5 80 Dwelling Fire 9 5 5 6 4 29 Other Building Fire 2 3 4 3 3 15 Other Property Fire 4 2 2 4 12 Vehicle Fire 2 5 4 2 4 17 SSC Other 2 4 4 2 4 16 SSC RTC Related 5 7 5 3 3 23 Grand Total 53 62 47 60 33 255

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 39 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Ward 2006/10 Road Traffic Fires Home Safety Visit IRMP Risk Collisions Prevention Activity Dwellings Fatal RTC Serious RTC Slight RTC Fatal Fire Serious Fire Slight Fire (PC Aid) & First Firsts Repeats % First visits in ward MEDIUM 1958 2 4 44 0 3 1 597 49 30.49 North Cleator Moor MEDIUM 1317 0 8 30 0 0 0 375 35 28.47 South Ennerdale LOW 498 1 3 29 0 1 1 55 4 11.04 Frizington MEDIUM 1183 0 8 27 0 2 4 328 33 27.73 New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER 10) (seconds) Total Failed Passed Category Excluded Standard (seconds) 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA Average response time Average to dwelling fires 2001-09 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st RISK SCORE (2005- 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP

16UEGH Cleator E01019263 60 M 600 377 M 12 1 11 Moor North 16UEGH Cleator E01019264 24 L 900 342 M Moor North 16UEGH Cleator E01019265 48 M 600 322 M 13 1 12 Moor North 16UEGJ Cleator E01019266 36 M 600 360 M 3 3 Moor South 16UEGJ Cleator E01019267 40 M 600 341 M 3 1 2 Moor South E01019276 16UEGN Ennerdale 42 M 600 704 L 5 1 4 E01019277 16UEGP Frizington 56 M 600 423 M 8 1 7 E01019278 16UEGP Frizington 46 M 600 386 M 4 1 3

40 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Frizington Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Frizington:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Whitehaven 02P1 20min 05s 3.86 Whitehaven 02P2 14min 58s Egremont 5.02 23min 54s Workington 01P2 14min 22s 9.53 Workington 01P1 17min 19s

Other contextual information

Frizington is situated in the Copeland District of Cumbria with a population of approximately 2,500 people.

Frizington Risk in station area: No significant Heritage Risk identified within the Heritage Station area Environment 7 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest No significant Site Specific Risks identified Site Specific Risks within the Station area No significant Flooding Risk identified within the Flooding Station area Of the 8 Super Output Areas that make up Frizington 7 are “Town and Fringe” according to Rurality DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 1 is a “Village and Hamlet”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew have almost halved over recent years, with a significant decrease in the number of anti social rubbish fires in 2008/9.The Station area is a mainly classed as ‘medium’ in terms of fire risk and it does have a number of environmental sites of specific scientific interest to consider.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 41 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Keswick Resources

The station was built in 1969 and incorporates a drill yard and tower, in addition to the two appliance bays. It is staffed by 18 firefighters employed on the retained duty system, who provide crewing for two fire engines. In addition there is a Land Rover appliance on the station.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Keswick Retained Appliances had been off the run of the following occasions:

Keswick 1 – 11 separate occasions for a combined total of 24 hours and 45 minutes

Keswick 2 – 214 separate occasions for a combined total of 704 hours and 45 minutes.

When Keswick 1 appliance was off the run so too was the Keswick 2 appliance and hence there would have been no fire cover provided during these times from Keswick Fire Station.

Activity

Keswick fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended will have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 5 4 3 1 8 21 FAA 51 33 55 39 29 207 FAGI 6 13 5 12 5 41 FAM 1 2 1 4 FDR3 15 8 16 17 15 71 Dwelling Fire 7 17 7 11 12 54 Other Building Fire 3 12 8 10 10 43 Other Property Fire 2 2 6 3 1 14 Vehicle Fire 5 3 9 5 3 25 SSC Other 13 9 8 4 6 40 SSC RTC Related 13 31 33 12 18 107 Grand Total 120 132 151 116 108 627

42 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Fatal RTC Serious RTC Slight RTC Fatal Fire Serious Fire Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First Firsts Repeats % First visits in ward Derwent LOW 841 1 11 70 0 1 0 328 33 27.73 Valley Keswick LOW 2792 5 18 102 0 0 4 70 2 8.32

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 43 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New SOA performance (2004/5 - Risk 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds)

Total Total Failed Passed Excluded CATEGORY fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2010 SOA RISK 2010 SOA 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP Average response time to dwelling Average RISK SCORE (2005-10) 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st

16UBGW E01019092 18 L 900 983 L 5 2 3 Derwent Valley 16UBHD E01019103 16 L 900 331 L 2 2 Keswick 16UBHD E01019104 30 L 900 384 L 9 1 8 Keswick 16UBHD E01019105 30 L 900 395 L 7 7 Keswick 16UBHD E01019106 54 M 600 531 L 6 1 5 Keswick

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Keswick Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Keswick:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Penrith 27P1 16.85 47min 45s Cockermouth 04P1 13.46 41min 32s Ambleside 60P1 15.65 35min 00s

The town of Keswick lies in the heart of the Lake District and is very popular with holiday makers and people coming for long weekends. The influx of tourists often increases the town's population threefold at the height of the season, filling many of the hotels and guest houses, significantly increasing the sleeping risk.

The main risks are associated with residential properties, hotels, guest houses and other types of holiday accommodation. However, other risks include large volumes of traffic on the predominantly 'B' type roads and the busy Penrith to Workington A66, which increases the potential for road traffic collisions. Open farmland brings the danger of barn and heath fires, in addition to other farm incidents, such as livestock rescues.

44 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

With three major lakes within the station area, the potential for water rescue incidents is high, as is the possibility of flooding which has resulted in some significant rescue operations in recent years.

Keswick Risk in station area: Heritage Castle Rigg Stone Castle Derwent Island House Mire House Force Crag Mine Threlkeld Settlement Grade I listed: Greta House (formerly Greta Hall), Keswick Grade II* listed: Church Of St Bega, Bassenthwaite Mirehouse, Bassenthwaite Orthwaite Hall and adjoining Barn The Moot Hall, Main Street, Keswick Church of St John, Keswick Church of St Kentigern, Church Lane, Gt Crosthwaite Millbeck Hall and adjoining Barn, Millbeck Environment Special Areas of Conservation: Borrowdale Woods (NY 235129),High Fells (NY 303318), River Derwent (NY262207), Tarn Moss (NY400274) Plus 32 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific No significant Site Specific Risks identified within the Station area Risks Flooding Flood Risk: The Town has been affected by some sever floods over recent years and this reamins one of the key considerations. Suitable training and equipment, in addition to close workings with the Environment Agency forms a key aspect of Keswick Station. Keswick is situated on the River Greta, immediately upstream of its confluence with the River Derwent. The Flood Warning area covers approximately 2.48 Km2 and includes low lying property, parkland and campsite between Low Briery on the River Gretna to where the River Derwent enters Derwentwater Lake. There are approximately 800 properties at risk with major flooding occuring in 1954, 1985, 2004, 2005 and 2009, and minor events every few years in between. Some key infrastructure is at risk of flooding such asThe Community Hospital, Waste Water Pumping Stations at St Kentigerns Close, Bridge Terrace and Elliott Park, as well as the local Police Station. Rurality In Keswick there are 5 Super Out Put Areas 3 can be described as “Town and Fringe” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 2 as “Village and Hamlet”.

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew have reduced over recent years, with a significant decrease in the number of False Alarms attended as a result of automatic fire alarm activations. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have one SOA classed as ‘medium’ risk and also a significant number of flood, heritage and environmental risks to consider. The nearest alternative fire station to Keswick is almost 15 miles away, with an average attendance time in excess of 30 minutes.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 45 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Maryport Resources

The fire station was purpose built in 1967 and houses two fire engines, with an adjoining drill yard and drill tower. Recently the station accommodation has been modified to provide a community room, which allows local groups to use the facilities. It is staffed by 20 firefighters employed on the retained duty system, who provide crewing for the two fire engines.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Maryport Retained Appliances had been off the run of the following occasions:

Maryport 1 – 3 separate occasions for a combined total of 2 hours and 45 minutes

Maryport 2 – 293 separate occasions for a combined total of 814 hours and 45 minutes.

When Maryport 1 appliance was off the run so too was the Maryport 2 appliance and hence there would have been no fire cover provided during these times from Maryport Fire Station.

Activity

Maryport fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 5 3 5 4 17 FAA 36 36 39 34 42 187 FAGI 15 14 17 21 9 76 FAM 6 4 3 7 8 28 FDR3 95 91 137 116 66 505 Dwelling Fire 30 29 27 28 30 144 Other Building Fire 22 14 14 11 5 66 Other Property Fire 4 9 5 16 2 36 Vehicle Fire 15 15 16 14 16 76 SSC Other 12 8 12 5 10 47 SSC RTC Related 19 9 14 13 10 65 Grand Total 259 232 284 270 202 1247

46 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First

Ellen LOW 1407 3 7 49 0 0 1 365 27 25.94 Ellenborough MEDIUM 1717 0 6 17 0 1 6 416 21 24.23 Ewanrigg MEDIUM 1505 2 3 32 0 3 1 550 29 36.54 Flimby MEDIUM 777 1 5 38 0 2 5 194 20 24.97 Netherhall MEDIUM 1536 0 10 107 0 5 0 332 49 21.61 Solway LOW 692 3 16 64 0 0 0 129 8 18.64

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 47 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA Average response time to dwelling Average 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st

E01019093 16UBGX Ellen 24 L 900 508 L 3 3 E01019094 16UBGX Ellen 26 L 900 498 L 3 1 2 16UBGY E01019095 70 M 600 383 M 24 1 23 Ellenborough 16UBGY E01019096 24 L 900 408 M 5 5 Ellenborough 16UBGZ E01019097 56 M 600 384 M 11 11 Ewanrigg 16UBGZ E01019098 42 M 600 409 M 9 1 8 Ewanrigg 16UBHA E01019099 68 M 600 460 M 9 2 7 Flimby 16UBHH E01019114 56 M 600 319 M 4 4 Netherhall 16UBHH E01019115 48 M 600 354 M 11 11 Netherhall 16UBHN E01019128 26 L 900 558 L 7 7 Solway

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Maryport Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Maryport:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Workington 01P2 6.20 11min 04s Cockermouth 04P1 7.08 12min 51s Aspatria 03P1 7.86 13min 47s

48 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Other contextual information

The town of Maryport is located on the west coast of Cumbria on the Solway Firth, just outside the Lake District National Park and has a population of approximately 11,500 people.

Although most of the original large factories have closed, these have been replaced by smaller factory units. The dock and harbour area has been revitalised over recent years, with the introduction of an aquarium, museum, yachting marina, fish handling plant and new residential properties, all of which bring their own inherent risks. Other risks associated with the area include those posed by residential properties, guest houses and hotels and the general increase in tourist activity. With large volumes of traffic on the predominantly 'B' type roads and the busy A596 trunk road running through the station area, results in significant numbers of serious road traffic collisions. There are six schools, as well as several residential homes for elderly people located within the town. Open farmland brings the danger of barn fires and other farm related incidents, such as livestock rescues.

Maryport Risk in station area: Grade I listed: Church of St John, Crosscannonby Church of St Mungo, Dearham Heritage Grade II* listed: Allanby House, Flimby Flimby Hall, Flimby Netherhall, Nether Hall Road, Maryport Environment 2 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks Degussa Goldschmidt Ltd Row Beck flows through Dearham and with many areas suffering from Flooding poor surface water drainage the risk of low level flooding is common in the Maryport area. Of the 10 Super Out Put Areas that make up Maryport 7 are designated Rurality “Town and Fringe” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 3 are “Village and Hamlet”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew have reduced in recent years to just over 200 in 2008/9. There has been a significant decrease in the number of anti social rubbish fires in 2008/9. The Station attends in the region of 30 dwelling fires per annum and the area is mainly classed as ‘medium’ and ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk. The station area does have some industrial, heritage and environmental risks within its boundary.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 49 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Seascale Resources

The Fire Station is located on Gosforth Road in the centre of Seascale village, staffed by 11 retained firefighters and has one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Seascale Retained Appliance had been off the run on 48 separate occasions for a combined total of 93 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Seascale’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney – Dwelling 2 4 4 2 12 FAA 4 1 4 9 2 20 FAGI 1 2 5 1 9 FAM 1 1 FDR3 6 10 4 6 9 35 Dwelling Fire 1 1 3 4 5 14 Other Building Fire 2 4 2 1 9 Other Property Fire 1 1 2 Vehicle Fire 1 2 2 2 3 10 SSC Other 6 5 1 2 2 16 SSC RTC Related 2 4 7 7 4 24 Grand Total 25 31 26 41 29 152

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

50 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Gosforth LOW 745 1 8 42 0 0 0 112 2 15.03 Seascale LOW 1385 0 11 46 0 1 0 179 31 12.92 New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st Average response time to Average 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA dwelling fires 2001-09 (seconds)

16UEGQ E01019279 18 L 900 670 L 3 3 Gosforth 16UEHE E01019303 20 L 900 312 L 6 6 Seascale 16UEHE E01019304 26 L 900 800 L 3 1 2 Seascale

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Seascale Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Seascale:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 51 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Egremont 05P1 8.93 18min 22s Whitehaven 02P1 13.36 37min 43s Bootle 41P1 13.14 22min 38s

Other contextual information

Seascale is a village on the West Cumbria coast with a population of approximately 2,800 people with a further 1,400 residing in the neighbouring village of Gosforth. The main employment in the area is the BNG site at Sellafield approximately two miles north of the village. The other main employment in the area is tourism with the Lake District National Park on the doorstep and the highest peaks in England, the Scafell range accessed through this area.

The A595 trunk road passes through the station area which can lead to problems with road traffic collisions and the station also deals with a significant number of supporting calls into the Sellafield site as back up to the works fire service.

Seascale Risk in station area: Hardnott Roman Fort Ravenglass Roman Bath House Burnmoor Stone Circles Grade I listed: Church of St Mary, Gosforth Castle Church of St Michael and All Angels, A595 Heritage Grade II* listed: Medieval Tower incorporated into Hall, Irton-with-Santon Eskdale Corn Mill, (Formerly Listed As Corn Mill) Gosforth Hall (Including Barn and Stables to the South and Gatepiers), Gosforth Church Of St Paul, Irton Medieval Tower Incorporated Into Irton Hall Church Of St Michael And All Angels, Neather Wasdale Special Area of Conservation: Wast Water (NY164062) Environment 10 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks British Nuclear Fuels Sellafield Of the 3 Super Out Put Areas that make up Seascale 1 is “Town and Fringe” Rurality according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 2 are “Village and Hamlet” Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 30 per annum with no significant trends over recent years. The Station area is classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have the significant nuclear risk from British Nuclear Fuels, Sellafield just 2 miles out of theTown. There are also a number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire station is almost 10 miles away with an average response time of around 20 minutes.

52 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Silloth Resources

The fire station was built in 1943 and to compliment the two appliance bays was altered in 1969 to incorporate a drill yard and tower. It is staffed by 12 firefighters employed on the retained duty system, who provide crewing for two fire applainces. One appliance is in the form of a speciallist Land Rover, which is used to gain access to various remote locations, where traditional built fire engines would be unable to travel.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Silloth Retained Fire Engine had been off the run on 123 separate occasions for a combined total of 439 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Silloth’s fire engine has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney – Dwelling 3 1 3 4 11 FAA 9 1 2 9 4 25 FAGI 6 6 2 8 4 26 FAM 5 1 1 1 8 FDR3 14 15 13 16 9 67 Dwelling Fire 8 5 7 3 4 27 Other Building Fire 3 2 7 1 13 Other Property Fire 1 6 2 3 12 Vehicle Fire 7 7 5 4 1 24 SSC Other 2 1 1 2 6 SSC RTC Related 4 5 3 5 1 18 Grand Total 61 45 49 53 29 237

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 53 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Home Safety Visit Road Traffic Collisions Fires Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Fatal Serious Dwellings ward RTC RTC Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Slight RTC Serious Fire % First visits in Slight Fire (PC & Holme MEDIUM 823 0 8 32 0 2 1 161 21 19.56 Silloth MEDIUM 1555 2 11 42 0 0 0 382 132 24.57

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Risk Total Failed Passed Category (2005-10) Excluded Standard (seconds) RISK SCORE 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA Average response time Average 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP to dwelling fires 2001-09 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st

16UBHC E01019102 40 M 600 740 M 9 1 8 Holme 16UBHM E01019126 38 M 600 400 M 15 2 13 Silloth 16UBHM E01019127 26 L 900 396 M 4 2 2 Silloth

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Silloth Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Silloth:

54 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Aspatria 03P1 9.07 22min 23s Wigton 11P1 10.76 19min 32s Maryport 08P1 21min 47s 12.93 Maryport 08P2 11min 43s

Other contextual information

In addition to residential risks, there are four elderly person’s homes, seven holiday camps, which during the summer months can considerably increase the population of the town. There is also a small, but busy dock, which apart from accepting small fishing vessels, also handles thousands of tonnes of imports and exports during the year, which brings its own inherent dangers.

Silloth Risk in station area: Holme Cultram Abbey Grade I listed: Church of St Mary, Abbeytown Heritage Church of St John the Baptist, Newton Arlosh Grade II* listed: Mill Grove, Abbeytown Environment Special Area of Conservation: Solway Firth (NY144648) Site Specific Risk Carrs Flour Mill, Silloth Silloth forms part of the Solway Firth and is prone to tidal Flooding flooding with a return period of approximately 1:200 years Of the 3 Super Out Put Areas that make up Silloth 1 is Rurality designated “Town and Fringe” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 2 are “Village and Hamlet”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew have reduced in recent years to just over 2 per month, on average. There has been a significant reduction in anti social rubbish fires. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘medium’ in terms of likely fire risk and it does have some heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 55 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Wigton Resources

The fire station was purpose built to cover the main risk in the area, that presented by Innovia (Formerly UCB Films). In addition to the two appliance bays, it also has an adjoining drill yard and drill tower. It is staffed by 14 firefighters employed on the retained duty system, who provide crewing for one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Wigton Retained Appliance had been off the run on 59 separate occasions for a combined total of 162 hours.

Activity

Wigton’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney – Dwelling 11 10 9 4 12 46 FAA 27 24 27 13 25 116 FAGI 12 4 8 7 2 33 FAM 1 2 1 1 5 FDR3 15 19 20 10 3 67 Dwelling Fire 13 7 7 9 5 41 Other Building Fire 6 6 12 3 6 33 Other Property Fire 5 4 3 4 3 19 Vehicle Fire 9 14 5 5 9 42 SSC Other 13 6 7 6 3 35 SSC RTC Related 14 12 14 13 14 67 Grand Total 126 108 112 75 83 504

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

56 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Aid) Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First

Marsh LOW 733 0 1 13 0 0 0 51 3 6.96 Wampool LOW 712 0 10 105 0 0 0 50 4 7.02 Warnell LOW 845 1 12 112 0 2 0 49 2 5.80 Waver LOW 759 4 11 67 0 0 0 57 2 7.51 Wigton LOW 2622 2 6 41 1 3 8 285 19 10.87 New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New performance (2004/5 - SOA Risk 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER RISK SCORE (2005-10) RISK 2010 SOA CATEGORY Attendance Appliance 1st Standard (seconds) response time to dwelling Average fires 2001-09 (seconds) Risk Ward 2006 IRMP Total Excluded Failed Passed E01019107 16UBHE Marsh 30 L 900 1316 L 5 5 16UBHQ E01019130 22 L 900 802 L 3 1 2 Wampool E01019131 16UBHR Warnell 20 L 900 1052 L 4 4 E01019132 16UBHS Waver 28 L 900 530 L 4 4 E01019134 16UBHU Wigton 24 L 900 486 L 4 4 E01019135 16UBHU Wigton 34 L 900 489 L 6 6 E01019136 16UBHU Wigton 60 M 600 418 L 4 4 E01019137 16UBHU Wigton 52 M 600 505 L 4 4

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 57 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Wigton Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Wigton:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Aspatria 03P1 8.44 17min 32s Carlisle 20P1 17min 34s 11.15 Carlisle 20P2 20min 45s Silloth 10P1 10.76 22min 19s

Other contextual information

The town of Wigton is located half way between the Lake District National Park and the upper Solway Firth coast to the northwest of the County and has a population of approximately 5,500. 2007 data indicated Wigton was the fastest growing town in Cumbria.

Apart from the main risk associated with Innovia, where they handle large quantities of solvents and corrosives in the manufacturing process. Other risks are associated with residential properties, large volumes of traffic on the predominantly ‘B’ type roads and the busy A595 and A596 trunk roads running through the station area, which results in significant numbers of serious road traffic collisions. Open farmland brings the danger of barn fires, heath and moor land fires, as well as livestock rescues.

58 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Wigton Risk in station area: Howk Bobbin Mill, Caldbeck Grade I listed: Church of St Andrew, Aikton Church of All Saints, Boltongate Drumburgh Castle, Drumburgh Ireby Old Church, Ireby Grade II* listed: Church of St Michael, Bowness Church of St Kentigern, Castle Sowerby Church of St Kentigern, Caldbeck Church of St Mary, Churchtown Heritage Sebergham Hall, Churchtown Fingland Farmhouse and adjoining barn, Fingland The Ashes, Highbridge Aisle columns west of Ireby Old Church, Ireby Church of St Bride, Kirkbride Warnell Hall (including Courtyard range and gatehouse with barn adjoining), Warnell Meadow Bank Farmhouse, West Curthwaite Fiddleback, West Woodside Islekirk Hall, Westward Church of St Mary, Wigton Hesket Hall Farmhouse, Hesket Newmarket Environment 7 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest The Fire Station flooded in 2005 and was very close to flooding again in Site Specific Risks 2008. Large scale flooding has affected some local businesses in recent years. Flooding There is no significant flooding risk in the station area Of the 8 Super Out Put Areas 3 are designated “Town and Fringe” Rurality according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 5 “Village and Hamlet”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew have reduced in recent years and now average around 80 per annum. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have some significant heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. Nearest supporting fire appliances are almost 20 minutes away at either Aspatria or Carlisle.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 59 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Carlisle Resources

Carlisle Fire Station is situated on Warwick Street in the centre of the city. The station houses two fire engines, an Aerial Ladder Platform (ALP) and a Major Rescue Vehicle (MRV). There are 57 regular (fulltime) firefighters, including eight crew managers, working on the conventional four-watch 2-2-4 duty system. In 2010/11 a North West Fire Authority Public Finance Initiative Project will see two new fire stations built in the City.

Activity

Carlisle fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended will have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney – Dwelling 12 17 14 21 25 89 FAA 585 538 523 519 477 2642 FAGI 129 164 130 116 98 637 FAM 74 67 46 47 36 270 FDR3 499 629 496 448 348 2420 Dwelling Fire 187 207 198 174 186 952 Other Building Fire 97 93 105 78 45 418 Other Property Fire 41 48 38 37 14 178 Vehicle Fire 191 106 122 87 87 593 SSC Other 132 100 128 97 97 554 SSC RTC Related 92 113 101 102 78 486 Grand Total 2039 2082 1901 1726 1491 9239

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

60 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC & % First visits in ward Belah MEDIUM 2622 0 11 70 0 1 5 660 22 25.17 Belle Vue MEDIUM 2461 0 1 45 0 2 0 638 30 25.92 Botcherby HIGH 2860 1 2 57 0 11 7 1152 96 40.28 Burgh LOW 868 0 4 30 0 0 0 82 4 9.45 Castle HIGH 2934 5 18 327 0 9 18 1050 53 35.79 Currock MEDIUM 2741 0 6 138 1 5 14 822 50 29.99 Dalston LOW 2641 19 46 278 5 4 4 300 16 11.36 Denton MEDIUM 3091 1 4 74 0 2 4 707 30 22.87 Holme Harraby HIGH 2887 0 6 103 1 4 8 838 44 29.03 Hayton LOW 897 3 5 35 0 0 0 109 5 12.15 Morton MEDIUM 3022 0 3 40 0 5 6 1408 44 46.59 St Aidans MEDIUM 2937 0 4 72 1 4 5 869 56 29.59 Stanwix MEDIUM 1861 4 12 143 2 9 1 234 8 12.57 Rural Stanwix MEDIUM 2666 1 7 100 0 1 2 724 30 27.16 Urban Upperby HIGH 2506 2 1 37 0 6 5 1057 49 42.18 LOW 2027 1 12 75 0 3 1 244 22 12.04 Yewdale MEDIUM 2625 1 5 28 0 3 3 656 18 24.99

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 61 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response performance Risk (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA NUMBER WARD (seconds) 10) Total Total Failed Passed Category Excluded Standard (seconds) 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA Average response time Average to dwelling fires 2001-09 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st RISK SCORE (2005- 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward IRMP 2006 E01019188 16UDGA Belah 30 L 900 352 M 9 1 8 E01019189 16UDGA Belah 44 M 600 378 M 10 1 9 E01019190 16UDGA Belah 42 M 600 378 M 7 7 E01019191 16UDGA Belah 16 L 900 293 M 4 1 3 16UDGB Belle E01019192 16 L 900 400 M 3 3 Vue 16UDGB Belle E01019193 78 H 300 300 M 17 2 15 Vue 16UDGB Belle E01019194 44 M 600 335 M 14 2 12 Vue 16UDGB Belle E01019195 18 L 900 273 M Vue 16UDGC E01019196 32 L 900 345 H 6 5 1 Botcherby 16UDGC E01019197 88 H 300 396 H 26 1 23 2 Botcherby 16UDGC E01019198 42 M 600 442 H 8 1 7 Botcherby 16UDGC E01019199 70 M 600 462 H 16 1 14 1 Botcherby E01019203 16UDGE Burgh 20 L 900 718 L 4 2 2 E01019204 16UDGF Castle 74 M 600 225 H 12 2 10 E01019205 16UDGF Castle 90 H 300 274 H 21 3 3 15 E01019206 16UDGF Castle 94 H 300 232 H 14 14 E01019207 16UDGF Castle 50 M 600 339 H 12 1 4 7 E01019208 16UDGG Currock 34 L 900 349 M 4 4 E01019209 16UDGG Currock 82 H 300 362 M 35 2 1 32 E01019210 16UDGG Currock 56 M 600 431 M 25 2 2 21 E01019211 16UDGG Currock 60 M 600 330 M 8 8 E01019212 16UDGH Dalston 22 L 900 817 L 2 2 E01019213 16UDGH Dalston 56 M 600 459 L 9 9 E01019214 16UDGH Dalston 22 L 900 446 L 5 5 16UDGJ Denton E01019215 40 M 600 339 M 8 1 7 Holme

62 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response performance Risk (2004/5 - 2008/9) SOA NUMBER WARD (seconds) Total Total 1st Appliance 1st Failed Passed (2005-10) Excluded 2010 SOA 2010 SOA Ward Risk Ward Average response Average 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP 2006 IRMP time to dwelling fires RISK SCORE Risk Category Attendance Standard

16UDGJ Denton 01019216 50 M 600 309 M 19 1 18 Holme 16UDGJ Denton E01019217 46 M 600 353 M 6 6 Holme 16UDGJ Denton E01019218 48 M 600 287 M 6 1 5 Holme E01019220 16UDGL Harraby 74 M 600 368 H 6 2 4 E01019221 16UDGL Harraby 48 M 600 402 H 8 8 E01019222 16UDGL Harraby 64 M 600 395 H 25 4 21 E01019223 16UDGL Harraby 20 L 900 352 H 4 4 E01019230 16UDGR Morton 60 M 600 364 M 19 1 18 E01019231 16UDGR Morton 86 H 300 375 M 30 1 29 E01019232 16UDGR Morton 28 L 900 295 M 5 5 E01019233 16UDGR Morton 32 L 900 345 M 6 1 5 16UDGS St 01019234 86 H 300 298 M 38 4 34 Aidans 16UDGS St E01019235 28 L 900 250 M 7 1 6 Aidans 16UDGS St E01019236 66 M 600 293 M 13 1 12 Aidans 16UDGS St E01019237 28 L 900 262 M 6 6 Aidans 16UDGT Stanwix E01019238 16 L 900 457 M 2 1 1 Rural 16UDGT Stanwix E01019239 28 L 900 794 M 2 2 Rural 16UDGT Stanwix E01019240 32 L 900 546 M 7 1 1 5 Rural 16UDGU Stanwix E01019241 16 L 900 249 M 3 3 Urban 16UDGU Stanwix E01019242 24 L 900 309 M 11 1 10 Urban 16UDGU Stanwix E01019243 16 L 900 296 M 3 1 2 Urban 16UDGU Stanwix E01019244 16 L 900 355 M 1 1 Urban E01019245 16UDGW Upperby 78 H 300 402 H 25 4 19 2 E01019246 16UDGW Upperby 44 M 600 452 H 11 1 10 E01019247 16UDGW Upperby 40 M 600 408 H 8 1 7 E01019248 16UDGW Upperby 68 M 600 378 H 12 1 11 E01019249 16UDGX Wetheral 34 L 900 519 L 6 6 E01019250 16UDGX Wetheral 20 L 900 683 L 3 3 E01019251 16UDGX Wetheral 16 L 900 610 L 3 1 2 E01019252 16UDGY Yewdale 32 L 900 401 M 3 1 2 E01019253 16UDGY Yewdale 26 L 900 341 M 11 11 E01019254 16UDGY Yewdale 24 L 900 382 M 3 3 E01019255 16UDGY Yewdale 24 L 900 526 M 2 2

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 63 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Carlisle Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Carlisle:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Longtown 25P1 8.49 13min 27s Brampton 23P1 9.84 16min 49s Wigton 11P1 11.15 17min 49s

Other contextual information

The city of Carlisle is situated in the north of the county near to the Scottish border. It is a city that is steeped in history and has many historical monuments including Carlisle Castle, the Cathedral and the Citadel which was built by Henry VIII. Although Carlisle is 2,000 years-old, it is a modern, thriving city offering shopping, entertainment, sports and sightseeing. It is the home of Carlisle United Football Club, an award winning museum and art gallery and the World Heritage site of Hadrian’s Wall.

It is an important junction point for some of the counties main transport routes such as the West Coast Rail Line, the M6 Motorway, the A69 and the A695 which join together the North East of England and West Cumbria with Scotland and the North West of England.

The City has a number of industrial estates, including Kingstown and Rosehill, both of which are home to many different commercial premises.

The Lanes Shopping Centre, in the heart of the city, has over 75 retailers under one roof. It is home to familiar high street names as well as a flagship Debenhams store.The victorian Market Hall, has independent specialist storeholders and a regular weekend farmer’s market.

Carlisle is split into 12 urban wards, has the largest population in the county nearing 102, 000 people, has eight secondary schools and a major hospital, an airport to the east of the city and the Sands Centre which is Cumbria’s premier live arts venue.

64 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Carlisle: Risk in station area: Heritage Carlisle Castle Wetheral Priory Carlisle Cathedral Dalston Road Cemetery Grade I listed: Church of St Michael Crown Court, adjoining offices and gate arch Nisi Prius Courthouse, associated offices and gate arch De Irebys Tower and outer bailey wall Eden Bridge Captains Tower and Inner Bailey Walls Market Cross Cathedral Church of the Holy and Undivided Trinity Nos 5 and 6 Green Market Nos 10-22 (Even) West Walls incorporating city walls Wall, gates and railings in front of Tullie House Bridge over outer Moat No 15, Tullie House and extensions Tithe Barn Old Town Hall West City Walls Nos 5, 5A and 5B The Abbey, The Deanery and Prior’s Tower Inner Bailey: Keep Abbey Gate and Gatehouse Inner Bailey: Palace Range including part of Queen Mary’s Tower Ruins of Dormitory of former Priory of St Mary Fratry of former Priory of St Mary West City Walls and Tile Tower adjoining at south-west Fragment of north City Walls adjoining south-east angle Outer Bailey: Half-Moon Battery, Flanking Wall and Bridge Dalton: Curtain Walls surrounding Rose Castle Gate with flanking lodge and tower, to north of Rose Castle Rose Castle : Kitchen garden walls to south-east of Corby Castle Gate Lodge to east of Corby Castle Wall and gate piers to East of Corby Castle Cascade to west of Corby Castle Dovecote to south- east of Corby Castle Salmon coops to South of Corby Castle Tempietto, Corby Castle Corby Castle Highbridge - Thistlewood Farmhouse Kirkbampton - Church of St Peter Rockcliffe - Churchyard Cross, south of Church of St Mary Wetherall Walls of east range of Wetheral Priory, east of Gatehouse Wetheral Priory Gatehouse Corby Bridge St Constantine’s Cells Plus over 50 Grade II* listed buildings

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 65 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Environment Special Protected Area: Rockcliffe Marsh (NY 087577) 9 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Central Plaza Hotel, Crown & Mitre Hotel, Stead Mcalpine, Cumberland Infirmary, Atlas Works, Risks Lappett Manufacturing Ltd, Carnaud Metalbox, Bevcan, Swallow Hilltop Hotel, Pirelli Ltd, Viaduct House, County Archives, Limehouse School, Carlisle United AFC, Cumbria Plating Services, Croftlands EPH, Barn Close, BSW Timber, BP Dalston, Nestles Flooding Flood Risk: There are several Flood Warning Areas within Carlisle Station’s catchment area. Warwick Bridge Flood risk area covers approximately 0.56 Km2 and consists of properties, roads and high quality agricultural land. There are in the region of 125 properties at risk of flooding. Low Crosby Flood risk area extends to approximately 4.309 Km2 and consists of approximately 130 properties. Significant parts of the City of Carlisle that lie within the flood plains of the Rivers Eden and Petteril are vulnerable to flooding. The Flood Warning area covers approximately 9.40 Km2 and vulnerable areas of the city consist of domestic, commercial and industrial properties. The majority of properties at risk are residential adjacent to the Warwick Road area but also include commercial and industrial properties in Willowholme, Caldewgate and Rickergate areas. In total there are over 2000 properties within the risk area and in January 2005 the City was subject to unprecedented flooding. The Harraby Green flood risk area covers 0.064 Km2 adjacent to the River Petteril and includes almost 50 commercial and residential properties. The natural floodplain of the River Caldew virtually disappears on entering the City of Carlisle and flows through the suburbs of Denton Hollme, Caldewgate and Willowholme joining the River Eden to the northwest of the city at the Sauceries. The Flood Warning Area covers less that a square kilometer but it is an intensively developed urban area comprising of mainly terraced residential housing, commercial and industrial properties, with almost 3000 properties at risk, including key vulnerable infrastructure such as an Electrical Sub Station, Waste Water Pumping Station, Transco and British Gas sites. Rurality Of the 58 Super Output Areas that constitute Carlisle the majority are designated “Urban” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications with 1 “Town and Fringe” and 7 “Village and Hamlet”

66 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Environment Special Protected Area: Rockcliffe Marsh (NY 087577) Activity by time of day 9 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Central Plaza Hotel, Crown & Mitre Hotel, Stead Mcalpine, Cumberland Infirmary, Atlas Works, Emergency response activity at Carlisle Fire Station varies immensely depending on the time of Risks Lappett Manufacturing Ltd, Carnaud Metalbox, Bevcan, Swallow Hilltop Hotel, Pirelli Ltd, Viaduct day: House, County Archives, Limehouse School, Carlisle United AFC, Cumbria Plating Services, Croftlands EPH, Barn Close, BSW Timber, BP Dalston, Nestles Carlisle Appliances - all incidents attended in 8 hour blocks Flooding Flood Risk: There are several Flood Warning Areas within Carlisle Station’s catchment area. 01.04.2004 - 31.03.2009 Warwick Bridge Flood risk area covers approximately 0.56 Km2 and consists of properties, roads and high quality agricultural land. There are in the region of 125 properties at risk of flooding. Low 3500 Crosby Flood risk area extends to approximately 4.309 Km2 and consists of approximately 130 3000 properties. Significant parts of the City of Carlisle that lie within the flood plains of the Rivers Eden 2500 and Petteril are vulnerable to flooding. The Flood Warning area covers approximately 9.40 Km2 and vulnerable areas of the city consist of domestic, commercial and industrial properties. The 2000 majority of properties at risk are residential adjacent to the Warwick Road area but also include 1500 commercial and industrial properties in Willowholme, Caldewgate and Rickergate areas. In total 1000 there are over 2000 properties within the risk area and in January 2005 the City was subject to Number of Incidents 500 unprecedented flooding. The Harraby Green flood risk area covers 0.064 Km2 adjacent to the River Petteril and includes almost 50 commercial and residential properties. The natural floodplain 0 of the River Caldew virtually disappears on entering the City of Carlisle and flows through the 1-9pm 1-9am 2-10pm 3-11pm 2-10am 3-11am 5pm-1am 6pm-2am 7pm-3am 8pm-4am 9pm-5am suburbs of Denton Hollme, Caldewgate and Willowholme joining the River Eden to the northwest 5am-1pm 6am-2pm 7am-3pm 8am-4pm 9am-5pm 4-Midnight 10pm-6am 11pm-7am 10am-6pm 11am-7pm 12noon-8pm 4am-12noon of the city at the Sauceries. The Flood Warning Area covers less that a square kilometer but it is an Midnight-8am intensively developed urban area comprising of mainly terraced residential housing, commercial P1 Incidents in 8 hour period P2 Incidents in 8 hour period and industrial properties, with almost 3000 properties at risk, including key vulnerable infrastructure such as an Electrical Sub Station, Waste Water Pumping Station, Transco and British Gas sites. Rurality Of the 58 Super Output Areas that constitute Carlisle the majority are designated “Urban” Carlisle Appliances - all incidents attended in 12 hour blocks according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications with 1 “Town and Fringe” and 7 “Village and 01.04.2004 - 31.03.2009 Hamlet” 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500

Number of Incidents 1000 500 0 0-Noon 1am-1pm 2am-2pm 3am-3pm 4am-4pm 5am-5pm 6am-6pm 7am-7pm 8am-8pm 9am-9pm 1pm-1am 2pm-2am 3pm-3am 4pm-4am 5pm-5am 6pm-6am 7pm-7am 8pm-8am 9pm-9am 10am-10pm 11am-11pm 12am-12pm 10pm-10am 11pm-11am

Conclusion P1 Incidents in 12 hour period P2 Incidents in 12 hour period

Overall the number of incidents attended by the station crews is declining year on year. There has been a substantial reduction in the number of anti social rubbish fires and vehicles fires have also reduced considerably. Calls to RTCs and automatic fire alarms are also on the decrease; however, worryingly dwelling fires remain high and are a cause for concern.There are 8 Super Output Areas classed as ‘high’ risk, 22 medium risk and 28 low. The City has significant heritage, environmental, industrial and flood risks.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 67 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Alston Resources

The Fire Station is located on Front Street and is currently staffed by 12 retained duty firefighters and has one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Alston Appliance had been off the run on 15 separate occasions for a combined total of 38 hours and 45 minutes.

Activity

Alston’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 5 4 3 6 1 19 FAA 4 4 3 2 4 17 FAGI 2 3 1 3 9 FAM 1 1 2 FDR3 1 2 5 5 2 15 OBAT 1 1 2 Dwelling Fire 2 2 1 1 2 8 Other Building Fire 1 3 1 1 6 Other Property Fire 2 1 3 Vehicle Fire 1 1 2 SSC Other 6 6 1 3 16 SSC RTC Related 3 1 1 3 8 Grand Total 25 26 18 18 20 107

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

68 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Alston MEDIUM 1107 2 22 50 0 0 4 142 44 12.83 Moor Hartside LOW 537 2 6 16 0 0 0 35 1 6.52

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Risk Total Total Failed Passed Category Excluded (2005-10) Standard (seconds) RISK SCORE Average response time Average to dwelling fires 2001-09 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP 16UFGF E01019305 50 M 600 667 M 7 3 4 Alston Moor 16UFGQ E01019314 24 L 900 1396 L 1 1 Hartside

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Alston Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Alston:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 69 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Penrith 27P1 19.62 39min 43s Penrith 27P2 35min 53s Lazonby 24P1 17.76 54min 50s Appleby 62P1 24.53 N/A

If required, additional support into Alston is available from Northumbria FRS, with Haltwhistle Fire Station (1 fire engine) and Allendale Fire Station (1 fire engine) both situated 14 miles away.

Other contextual information

Alston is situated in the North East corner of the County, on the confluence of the South Tyne and the River Nent. It is said to be the highest market town in England, at about 300 metres above sea level.

Historically the area was mined for lead, silver, zinc coal and fluorspar, these have all closed now, the last mine closed in the 1950's, although the mining history is exploited for tourism purposes. Currently the main employer is Precision Products, which employs around 65 workers.

Tourism is now a key source of income for the area, and also increases the towns' population, mainly within the summer months due to cyclists and walkers traveling the coast to coast route leading to increased sleeping risk.The risks are mainly residential, however there are a number of hotels and guest houses which cater to the tourism trade. Due to the rural nature of the area, firefighters are called to deal with fires involving grass and heath land, barns and agricultural buildings. The station also attends a number of road traffic collisions each year.

Alston: Risk in station area: Heritage No significant Heritage Risk identified within the Station area Special Areas of Conservation; Moor House (NY799358), Tyne and Environment Nent (NY 715448) North Pennine Moors (NY841291) 7 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks Townhead area is liable to flooding Flooding No significant Flooding Risk identified within the Station area Of the 2 Super Output Areas that make up Alston both are designated Rurality as “Village and Hamlet” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications

Conclusion

The total incidents attended by the fire station crew are low and average less than two per month. There are no identified trends in calls to specific incidents. In terms of fire risk, the Station area is split, with one Super Output Area classed as medium and one low risk. There are some significant environmental risks within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire station is almost 20 miles away and the quickest in terms of response times is Penrith but the travel times are excessive at over 30 minutes.

70 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Brampton Resources

The fire station is located on Greenfield lane and is currently staffed by 13 firefighters on the retained duty system and has one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Brampton Appliance had been off the run on 10 separate occasions for a combined total of 17 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Brampton’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended will have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 5 8 4 9 9 35 FAA 17 13 19 16 18 83 FAGI 8 8 4 5 7 32 FAM 1 1 2 FDR3 14 11 15 10 3 53 OBAT 2 1 2 5 Dwelling Fire 6 5 7 6 6 30 Other Building Fire 7 5 8 4 7 31 Other Property Fire 3 7 3 2 2 17 Vehicle Fire 4 7 5 3 6 25 SSC Other 8 6 2 6 7 29 SSC RTC Related 8 14 5 4 6 37 Grand Total 83 84 74 65 73 379

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 71 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Brampton MEDIUM 2145 2 16 89 0 5 2 410 41 19.11 Great Corby & LOW 941 0 2 49 1 6 0 124 4 13.18 Geltsdale Irthing LOW 953 4 6 40 0 0 1 83 12 8.71

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st Average response time to Average 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA dwelling fires 2001-09 (seconds) E01019200 16UDGD Brampton 28 L 900 493 M 5 2 3 E01019201 16UDGD Brampton 26 L 900 344 M 6 1 5 E01019202 16UDGD Brampton 40 M 600 417 M 4 1 3 16UDGK Great E01019219 56 M 600 705 L 7 1 2 4 Corby and Geltsdale E01019224 16UDGM Hayton 20 L 900 797 L 4 1 3 E01019225 16UDGN Irthing 26 L 900 872 L 6 1 1 4

72 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Brampton Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Brampton:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Carlisle 20P1 17min 16s 9.84 Carlisle 20P2 15min 38s Longtown 10.85 30min 41s Lazonby 15.77 37min 08s

Additional support into Brampton is available from Northumbrian FRS and Lothian and Borders FRS, with Haltwhistle Fire Station (1 fire engine) 13 miles away and Newcastleton Fire Station (1 fire engine) 23 miles away.

Other contextual information

Brampton is a small market town situated nine miles east of Carlisle, near to Carlisle Airport on the B6243. The town was founded in the 7th century, with many of the historic houses still remaining. The population of Brampton and the surrounding area is approximately 6,500 people, with this number being increased by tourists visiting this lovely area.

The risks are mainly residential, although there are a number of pubs and guest houses which cater to the tourist trade, the station also covers a large rural community extending to approximately 12,500 hectares. Due to the busy roads which surround Brampton, including the A69, the station attends a number of road traffic collisions.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 73 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Brampton: Risk in station area: Banna (Birdoswald Fort) Hadrian’s Wall (UNESCO World Heritage Site) Grade I listed: Askerton Castle, Askerton Church of St Martin, Brampton Roman Wall, west of former Vicarage, Gilsland The Vicarage, Landercost Lanercost Priory, Landercost including Gateway arch west of, walls to the north of and cross base north-west of. Church of St Mary, Landercost Dacre Hall, Landercost Naworth Castle, Naworth including walled garden east of, 'Boat' House east of and Gatehouse east of. Heritage Denton Hall and adjoining barn/stables, Nether Denton Grade II* listed: Church of St Cuthbert, Bewcastle Four Gables, Brampton Moot Hall, Brampton Church of St Mary Magdalene, Hayton Gelt Bridge, Hayton Church of St Kentigern, Irthington Tarn House, Midgeholme Old Church Farmhouse, Brampton Church of St Martin, Brampton Temon and adjoining outbuilding, Upper Denton Upper Denton Church, Upper Denton Church of St Mary, Walton Special Areas of Conservation: Bolton Fell Moss (NY490688), Walton Environment Moss (NY504665) 13 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks Gilsland Spa Hotel; Carlisle Airport; Spadeadam Flooding No significant Flooding Risk identified within the Station area Of the 6 Super Output Areas that make up Brampton 3 are designated as Rurality “Town and Fringe” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 3 as “Village and Hamlet” Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 70 – 80 per annum with a reduction seen in anti social rubbish fires over recent years. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have the significant numbers of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. Carlisle Fire Station is the nearest alternative in terms of fire cover, with average attendance times of over 15 minutes.

74 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Lazonby Resources

The Fire Station is currently staffed by 11 firefighters working the retained duty system and has one engine. It is located at Banktop.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Lazonby Appliance had been off the run on 382 separate occasions for a combined total of 1835 hours and 45 minutes.

Activity

Lazonby’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 5 4 7 5 9 30 FAA 13 7 6 7 4 37 FAGI 3 2 2 7 FDR3 3 7 6 2 4 22 Dwelling Fire 7 3 7 1 3 21 Other Building Fire 6 3 4 3 5 21 Other Property Fire 1 3 5 2 5 16 Vehicle Fire 6 2 4 2 2 16 SSC Other 6 3 2 2 13 SSC RTC Related 4 6 3 2 15 Grand Total 54 35 47 28 34 198

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 75 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity 2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC % First visits in visits First % Hesket LOW 1295 10 31 124 0 7 5 87 4 6.72 Kirkoswald LOW 616 0 7 26 1 1 0 54 3 8.77 Langwathby LOW 679 4 24 84 0 1 1 44 1 6.48 Lazonby LOW 678 0 3 20 0 0 0 105 6 15.49

New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Risk Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Category (2005-10) Standard (seconds) Average response time Average RISK SCORE 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP to dwelling fires 2001-09 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st

16UFGR E01019315 64 M 600 874 L 4 2 2 Hesket 16UFGR E01019316 20 L 900 925 L 2 1 1 Hesket 16UFGU E01019320 28 L 900 1268 L 4 2 2 Kirkoswald 16UFGW E01019321 34 L 900 869 L 6 3 3 Langwathby 16UFGX E01019322 20 L 900 530 L 6 6 Lazonby Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Lazonby Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Lazonby:

76 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Penrith 27P1 7.39 18min 47s Penrith 27P2 19min 01s Carlisle 20P1 15.26 20min 58s Carlisle 20P2 22min 04s Alston 22P1 17.76 29min 40s

Other contextual information

Lazonby is a village and in the Lower Eden valley, about 8 miles NNE of Penrith. The village is quite large by local standards, offering a number of amenities to its local inhabitants which include, two public houses, a primary school, a co-operative store and post office, swimming pool, railway station and a large bakery.

In recent years many new housing developments have sprung up in the village, with the village being mainly lived in by people who work in Carlisle and Penrith.

The station provides cover to a remote rural area of approximately 31,000 hectares, and is bounded by high fells to the east. The risks are mainly residential, industries include the large bakery, agriculture and forestry.

Firefighters attend a wide range of incidents which include property fires, grass and heath land fires, and road traffic collisions. In recent years the station has also attended a number of swift water rescues from the ‘white water’ section of the river Eden past Nunnery Crags and through the gorge.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 77 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Lazonby Risk in station area Long Meg Stone Circle Grade I listed: The College, Kirkoswald The Nunnery, Staffield Grade II* listed: Church of St Michael, Addingham Armathwaite Castle, Armathwaite The Old Pele and Rectory Farm and barn, Croglin Outbuilding to east of White House Farmhouse, Glassonby The Rectory, Great Salkeld Church of St Cuthbert, Great Salkeld Heritage Ona Ash, High Bankhill Church of St Mary, High Hesket Byre to north of Croglin Low Hall, Kirkoswald Bell Tower north-east of Church of St Oswald, Kirkoswald Croglin Low Hall, Kirkoswald Demesne Farmhouse, Kirkoswald Nether Haresceugh, Kirkoswald Church of St Oswald, Kirkoswald The Watermill, attached house, barn and stables, Little Salkeld Salkeld Hall, Little Salkeld Byre west of Townhead, Newbiggin Newbiggin Hall, Newbiggin Environment 3 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks Well Well Well (Uk) Ltd Flooding No significant Flooding Risk identified within the Station area Of the 5 Super Output Areas that make up Lazonby all are designated as “Village and Rurality Hamlet” according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 30 – 40 per annum with a gradual reduction over recent years. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does one Super Output Area classed as ‘medium’ risk and also has a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. Many of these are in neighbouring small villages. The nearest alternative fire station is Penrith, just over 7 miles away. However, due to the rural roads average attendance times are almost 20 minutes.

78 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Longtown Resources

Longtown Fire Station is situated on Mary Street in the centre of the town. The station is staffed by 9 retained firefighters and has one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Longtown Appliance has been off the run on 85 separate occasions for a combined total of 297 hours and 45 minutes.

Activity

Longtown’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 2 4 2 11 19 FAA 18 17 17 26 17 95 FAGI 9 5 4 5 4 27 FAM 1 1 2 FDR3 13 16 9 15 7 60 OBAT 1 1 2 Dwelling Fire 9 9 5 2 25 Other Building Fire 7 5 9 6 7 34 Other Property Fire 2 6 3 4 3 18 Vehicle Fire 9 10 6 6 6 37 SSC Other 18 9 2 4 4 37 SSC RTC Related 11 9 8 7 6 41 Grand Total 99 92 63 77 66 397

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 79 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC % First visits in

Longtown & MEDIUM 1850 10 36 217 2 3 3 323 21 17.46 Rockcliffe Lyne LOW 846 1 2 22 0 1 0 167 8 19.74

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) Average response time to dwelling Average 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st 16UDGP E01019226 Longtown & 50 M 600 661 M 4 2 2 Rockcliffe 16UDGP E01019227 Longtown & 38 M 600 408 M 12 2 2 8 Rockcliffe 16UDGP E01019228 Longtown & 28 L 900 519 M 2 1 1 Rockcliffe 16UDGQ E01019229 28 L 900 1325 L 3 2 1 Lyne

80 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Longtown Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Longtown:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Carlisle 20P1 8.49 15min 43s Carlisle 20P2 14min 05s Brampton 23P1 10.85 22min 48s Wigton 11P1 19.45 N/A

If required, additional support into Longtown is available from FRS, with Gretna Fire Station (1 fire engine) 5 miles away and Annan Fire Station (2 fire engines) 14 miles away.

Other contextual information

Longtown is situated on the south bank of the River Esk, two miles from Gretna Green and 10 miles from the centre of Carlisle.

It has a population of about 3,000 and it is a farming town and much of the business in and around Longtown depends on agriculture.

The town has two schools, Lochinvar Secondary School and Longtown Primary School, as well as Longtown Community Development Centre, which provides ICT courses, and Longtown Memorial Hall Community Centre. It also has well established business and retail sectors.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 81 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Longtown Risk in station area Grade I listed: Scaleby Castle, Scaleby Grade II* Listed: Brackenhill Tower, Arthuret Church of St Cuthbert, Kirklinton Heritage Churchyard cross, west of Church of St Michael, Longtown Netherby Hall, Netherby Coop House, north-west of Netherby Hall, Netherby Stonegarthside Hall, Nicholforest Riddings Junction Viaduct, Riddings Environment 3 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risk DM Longtown; Bolton Fell Peat Works In recent years there have been numerous flooding incidents to houses adjacent to a culvert on Lochinvar Beck, at Longtown. This Flooding flooding affects a number of properties on the adjacent estate, with the Fire Station also being vulnerable. Of the 4 Super Out Put Areas that make up Longtown 2 are Rurality designated “Town and Fringe“ according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 2 “Village and Hamlet”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 70 per annum with a gradual reduction over recent years. The number of dwelling fires attended has significantly reduced, with none being reported during 2008/9. The Station area is split between ‘medium’ and ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have a number of heritage and environmental risks in neighbouring villages within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire station is Carlisle.

82 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Patterdale Resources

The station was purpose-built in 1974 halfway between Patterdale and Glenridding next to the Police station, which has long since closed and is now privately owned. The fire station was originally built to house a Land Rover and so space is quite limited now that a larger appliance is required. In 2011 CFRS plans to construct a new modern Fire Station on the same site as part of a North West FRA Public Finance Initiative (PFI) project. There are currently 11 firefighters crewing the station working on the retained duty system.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Patterdale Appliance had been off the run on 55 separate occasions for a combined total of 114 hours.

Activity

Patterdale’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended will have been in neighbouring station areas:

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 1 1 5 2 9 FAA 3 2 3 1 9 FAGI 1 2 1 4 FAM 1 1 FDR3 1 1 1 1 4 Dwelling Fire 2 2 2 6 Other Building Fire 1 2 1 4 Other Property Fire 1 1 2 Vehicle Fire 1 2 2 5 SSC Other 2 4 3 1 10 SSC RTC Related 1 2 1 2 6 Grand Total 10 8 17 16 9 60

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 83 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Home Safety Visit Road Traffic Collisions Fires Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Askham LOW 732 0 17 39 0 2 2 60 9 8.20 Ullswater LOW 800 0 11 60 0 3 0 186 25 23.25

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) (seconds) Risk Total Total Failed 1st Appliance 1st Passed Category Excluded (2005-10) RISK SCORE Attendance Standard 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA Average response time Average 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP to dwelling fires 2001-09

16UFGJ E01019308 48 M 600 815 L 5 2 3 Askham 16UFHL E01019339 36 M 600 761 L 6 2 4 Ullswater Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Patterdale Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Patterdale:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Penrith 27P1 22min 06s 21.97 Penrith 27P2 42min 33s Ambleside 61P1 39min 29s 13.91 Ambleside 61M1 29min 36s Keswick 07P1 26.09 54min 30s

84 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Other contextual information

The communities of Patterdale and Glenridding historically were mainly farming and mining orientated, but of late, they have become more and more reliant on tourism. Mining ceased in the early 1960's and farming employs less people by the year.

The fire engine based at Patterdale covers an area from the Inn at the top of Kirkstone Pass in the south, this is 1500' above sea level; northwards as far as Watermillock which is half way down the side of Lake Ullswater, and westwards as far as the A66 at Troutbeck.

Within that area the most significant risks are undoubtedly the large hotels in and around Glenridding and along the length of Lake Ullswater. Also within the area are two Youth Hostels and several residential outdoor pursuit centres, which cater for large numbers of students, many of secondary school age. Other risks include agricultural premises and the lake steamers which can carry up to 200 passengers.

Patterdale Risk in station area High Street Roman Road Cockpit Stone Circle Myers Head Mine Heritage Grade I listed: Hartsop Hall and farm buildings attached Grade II* listed: Matterdale Church Farm buildings attached to Glencoyne, Glenridding Special Area of Conservation : Ullswater Oak Woods Environment (NY400128) 4 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest No significant Site Specific Risks identified within the Station Site Specific Risks area There is risk of flooding posed from Grisedale, Deepdale and Goldrill becks with properties on the lower fells being particularly Flooding susceptible. A further problem is that often during severe weather the valley is left isolated due to impassable roads. Of the 2 Super Out Put Areas that make up Patterdale both are Rurality designated “Village and Hamlet” according to DEFRA Urban/ Rural classifications.

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew are very low with only 9 callouts during 2008/9. The Station area is classed as ‘medium’ in terms of likely fire risk mainly due to a number of fire related casualties occurring in the two Super Output Areas over the last 5 years. There are a number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire station is in Ambleside but due to the road infrastructure a quicker response is available from Penrith which is some 20 miles away.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 85 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Penrith Resources

Penrith Fire Station is situated on Bridge Lane, just on the outskirts of the town centre and houses two fire engines which are currently crewed by 22 retained personnel. Penrith is a developingTown and with that brings increased industrial and residential risk. In 2010 CFRS aims to establish a regular crew onto Penrith Station in order to mitigate the risk during peak activity times and improve our intervention response. As part of a North West FRA PFI project we also plan to build a new Fire Station at a strategic position adjactent to the main A66 at Kemplay Bank roundabout.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Penrith 2 Retained Appliance had been off the run on 173 separate occasions for a combined total of 381 hours and 45 minutes. There were no occasions during the year when the first appliance had been off the run.

Activity

Penrith fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended will have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 19 10 7 15 31 82 FAA 127 147 134 136 118 662 FAGI 22 42 24 25 18 131 FAM 7 7 5 7 2 28 FDR3 13 32 32 21 25 123 Dwelling Fire 46 42 38 24 24 174 Other Building Fire 26 19 34 31 21 131 Other Property Fire 12 12 12 9 5 50 Vehicle Fire 16 16 26 25 23 106 SSC Other 32 14 16 22 11 95 SSC RTC Related 58 60 46 42 32 238 Grand Total 378 401 374 357 310 1820

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

86 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) First & (PC Fire Slight Dacre LOW 660 1 18 55 0 3 0 73 6 11.06 Eamont LOW 700 2 10 49 0 0 0 50 1 7.14 Greystoke LOW 729 3 4 66 0 0 1 76 2 10.43 Kirkby Thore LOW 687 0 10 90 0 0 0 65 6 9.46 Morland LOW 581 1 6 38 0 1 0 57 3 9.81 Penrith Carleton LOW 695 1 1 20 0 0 0 171 15 24.60 Penrith East LOW 1241 0 0 12 0 0 2 234 9 18.86 Penrith North LOW 1924 0 10 60 1 0 0 229 25 11.90 Penrith Pategill LOW 696 0 1 33 0 2 0 208 20 29.89 Penrith South LOW 1150 0 6 91 0 2 1 448 35 38.96 Penrith West LOW 1472 2 5 94 0 2 2 238 14 16.17 Skelton LOW 643 2 11 38 0 0 0 61 4 9.49

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 87 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New performance (2004/5 - SOA Risk 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) Average response time to dwelling Average 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st E01019311 16UFGM Dacre 32 L 900 658 L 3 3 E01019312 16UFGN Eamont 20 L 900 606 L 6 6 16UFGP E01019313 20 L 900 814 L 3 1 2 Greystoke 16UFGT Kirkby E01019319 38 M 600 741 L 5 5 Thore E01019324 16UFGZ Morland 22 L 900 1039 L 4 2 2 16UFHB Penrith E01019326 16 L 900 408 L 4 1 3 Carleton 16UFHC Penrith E01019327 52 M 600 399 L 14 1 13 East 16UFHC Penrith E01019328 16 L 900 466 L 1 1 East 16UFHD Penrith E01019329 20 L 900 516 L 1 1 North 16UFHD Penrith E01019330 16 L 900 482 L North 16UFHD Penrith E01019331 20 L 900 460 L 5 5 North 16UFHE Penrith E01019332 34 L 900 406 L 16 16 Pategill 16UFHF Penrith E01019333 40 M 600 414 L 11 1 10 South 16UFHF Penrith E01019334 42 M 600 493 L 5 1 4 South 16UFHG Penrith E01019335 40 M 600 514 L 16 16 West 16UFHG Penrith E01019336 26 L 900 463 L 9 1 8 West E01019338 16UFHK Skelton 24 L 900 1137 L 4 4

88 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Penrith Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Penrith:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Lazonby 24P1 7.39 25min 21s Shap 68P1 9.53 14min 56s Appleby 62P1 12.95 18min 42s

Other contextual information

Penrith is situated at the crossroads of the M6 and the A66 within the Eden valley just north of the River Eamont which has caused sever flooding incidents over recent years.

Penrith has a rich history. It was in the 9th and 10th century that the town became the capital of Cumbria, a semi-dependant state which until 1070 AD formed part of the Kingdom of Scotland & Strathclyde. The two oldest streets, Burrowgate and Sandgate, date from the 13th Century and there are additional significant heritage buildings within the station area.

The risks within the town, are both residential and commercial and with major roads being major arterial ways for the County, an ever increasing number of road traffic collisions are now being attended.

The station provides cover also to a large remote rural area covering approximately 37,500 hectares.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 89 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Penrith: Risk in station area Brougham Castle Clifton Hall Countess Pillar King Arthur’s Table Mayburgh Henge White Raise Cairn Lowther Castle Grade I listed: Askham Hall, Askham Church of St Michael, Barton Church of St Andrew, Dacre Dacre Castle, Dacre Dalemain Eamont Bridge, Eamont Bridge Heritage Church of St Cuthbert, Edenhall Gloucester Arms, Great Dockray, Penrith Hutton-In-The-Forest-Hall (including Garden wall and gateway east of), Hutton-In-The- Forest Blencow Hall Farmhouse and gatehouse wing, Little Blencow Church of St Laurence, Morland Catterlen Hall, Newton Reigny Church of St Ninian, Ninekirks Beacon Tower, Penrith Penrith Castle, Penrith Parish Church of St Andrew, Penrith Scales Hall and barn adjoining; Gatehouse and curtain wall of Scales Hall, Scales Acorn Bank House, Temple Sowerby Yanwath Hall (including Courtyard range adjoining), Yanwath Plus over 70 Grade II* listed buildings Special Area of Conservation: River Eden (NY462237) Environment 14 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Ullswater Pumping Station; Alba Proteins(Wildriggs); Carrs Billington Agriculture; Risks Rheged; Yanwath Care Home Flood Risk: The River Eamont at Eamont Bridge has cased flooding in recent years: 1968, 1985, 1995, 2005 and 2009 are exmples of some of the worst occasions. The Eamont catchment covers an area of approximately 230Km2 and its main tributaries are the River Lowther, Dacre Beck and Thacka Beck. Average annual rainfall is high over most of the catchment ranging from 270mm in the South West to 800mm in the North East. Flooding in the Eamonth Bridge area is mainly due to the River Eamonth outflow from Ullswater but Dacre Beck, which joins the Eamont upstream of the Eamont Bridge Flood Warning area, can often have a significant influence during flood events. There are approximately 90 properties at risk, including Southwaite Green Mill Caravan Park. Flooding Penrith Station is also the first to respond to flood risk again arising from the river Eden, at Armathwaite. The Armathwaite Flood Warning Area covers approximately 0.0015Km2 and consists of isolated properties, roads and high quality agricultural land from Langwathby to Armathwaite. There are approximately 32 properties at risk, including Armathwaite Castle. Major flooding to the area has occurred in 1822, 1856, 1925, 1968, 1972, 2005 and 2009.

The centre of Penrith flooded in 2003 and again in 2006 as a result of localised heavy rainfall over the Thacka Beck catchment (M6 corridor between J40-41). It affected the businesses on Middlegate, particularly those close to Burrowgate. Of the 17 Super Out Put Areas that make up Penrith the majority are designated “Urban“ Rurality according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications and 6 “Village and Hamlet”

90 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

The total incidents attended by the fire station crew have reduced over recent years with a significant reduction in false alarm calls. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of fire risk but there are pockets of ‘medium’ risk within the area. There are significant heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary and areas of the Town are also susceptible to flooding.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 91 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Barrow Resources

Barrow's Phoenix Road fire station was opened in 1996 replacing the old central fire station in Abbey Road. Covering the coastal town of Barrow with a population of 50,000 in some 20,000 households, the station was the first new one to be built by Cumbria Fire & Rescue Service since the service's formation in 1974. It has five bays housing two fire engines, anAerial Ladder Platform (ALP), a Major Rescue Vehicle (MRV) and an Incident Response Unit (IRU). The watch strength is 14 comprising of 2 crew managers and 12 firefighters, working on the conventional 2-2-4 (four Watch) duty system.

The site as well as containing the station and locality headquarters, has a large drill ground with tower and comprehensive Breathing Apparatus (BA) training facilities. The locality office section of the building doubles as an emergency control centre for the Furness & South Lakeland Area and as such would be utilised by responding agencies for a major emergency in that area.

Activity

Barrow fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 10 16 14 26 26 92 FAA 389 440 447 395 447 2118 FAGI 71 94 93 93 94 445 FAM 20 38 23 22 20 123 FDR3 314 312 323 253 202 1404 Dwelling Fire 133 142 136 133 120 664 Other Building Fire 95 107 106 86 98 492 Other Property Fire 23 27 47 14 23 134 Vehicle Fire 40 48 34 18 38 178 SSC Other 153 69 91 78 84 475 SSC RTC Related 35 19 28 31 30 143 Grand Total 1283 1312 1342 1149 1182 6268

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

92 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First Barrow Island HIGH 1773 1 3 38 0 0 4 467 92 26.34 Central HIGH 2927 0 10 128 0 6 10 1009 98 34.47 Hawcoat MEDIUM 2313 0 10 62 0 2 2 837 79 36.19 Hindpool HIGH 2849 0 15 246 0 2 16 1022 107 35.87 Newbarns HIGH 2438 2 7 69 0 4 7 724 78 29.70 Ormsgill HIGH 2718 0 5 84 0 3 6 601 40 22.11 Parkside MEDIUM 2345 1 7 86 0 3 7 733 60 31.26 Risedale HIGH 2441 1 6 60 0 7 6 820 117 33.59 Roosecote MEDIUM 2557 1 6 60 2 3 4 524 60 20.49

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 93 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) (seconds) Risk Total Total Failed 1st Appliance 1st Passed Category Excluded (2005-10) RISK SCORE Attendance Standard 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA Average response time Average 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP to dwelling fires 2001-09

16UCFP Barrow E01019138 36 M 600 286 H 1 1 Island 16UCFP Barrow E01019139 68 M 600 286 H 14 7 7 Island E01019140 16UCFQ Central 68 M 600 294 H 11 5 6 E01019141 16UCFQ Central 88 H 300 243 H 43 3 5 35 E01019142 16UCFQ Central 52 M 600 283 H 14 6 8 E01019143 16UCFQ Central 50 M 600 309 H 19 1 10 8 E01019152 16UCFT Hawcoat 40 M 600 365 M 3 1 2 E01019153 16UCFT Hawcoat 20 L 900 313 M 5 5 E01019154 16UCFT Hawcoat 38 M 600 347 M 4 4 E01019155 16UCFT Hawcoat 34 L 900 341 M 6 6 E01019156 16UCFU Hindpool 88 H 300 213 H 30 1 3 26 E01019157 16UCFU Hindpool 82 H 300 224 H 27 1 26 E01019158 16UCFU Hindpool 60 M 600 245 H 13 2 11 E01019159 16UCFU Hindpool 46 M 600 221 H 7 2 5 E01019160 16UCFW Newbarns 50 M 600 304 H 15 1 10 4 E01019161 16UCFW Newbarns 70 M 600 410 H 5 5 E01019162 16UCFW Newbarns 16 L 900 359 H 2 2 E01019163 16UCFW Newbarns 16 L 900 330 H 4 3 1 E01019164 16UCFX Ormsgill 56 M 600 276 H 20 2 18 E01019165 16UCFX Ormsgill 56 M 600 222 H 8 1 7 E01019166 16UCFX Ormsgill 56 M 600 205 H 10 1 9 E01019167 16UCFX Ormsgill 36 M 600 192 H 4 2 2 E01019168 16UCFY Parkside 70 M 600 265 M 14 1 13 E01019169 16UCFY Parkside 26 L 900 357 M 3 1 2 E01019170 16UCFY Parkside 60 M 600 278 M 5 5 E01019171 16UCFY Parkside 72 M 600 230 M 12 1 11 E01019172 16UCFZ Risedale 48 M 600 344 H 6 1 4 1 E01019173 16UCFZ Risedale 52 M 600 299 H 6 1 5 E01019174 16UCFZ Risedale 42 M 600 287 H 8 2 6 E01019175 16UCFZ Risedale 76 H 300 328 H 14 2 6 6 16UCGA E01019176 20 L 900 404 M 2 2 Roosecote 16UCGA E01019177 58 M 600 365 M 10 10 Roosecote 16UCGA E01019178 60 M 600 537 M 4 2 2 Roosecote 16UCGA E01019179 20 L 900 465 M 1 1 Roosecote

94 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Barrow Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Barrow:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Walney 48P1 2.13 10min 03s Dalton 44P1 4.17 11min 28s Ulverston 47P1 11min 51s 8.60 Ulverston 47P2 13min 55s

Other contextual information

Although Barrow remains predominantly a shipbuilding town with the BAE Systems shipyard specialising in submarine construction, crews from the station also train regularly on the more diversified risk sites such as the gas terminals, a paper mill and vessels in the dock system.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 95 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Barrow: Risk in station area: Bow Bridge Grade I listed: West Gate to Furbess Abbey, remains of Capella Extra Portas with attached walls Gateway adjoining Capella Extra Portas Furness Abbey Wall Furness Abbey, including all medieval remains in care of English Heritage Piel Castle No 101, Rampside Hall Grade II* listed: Heritage Abbey House Hotel Town Hall Church of St James Ormsgill Farmhouse Barn immediately to rear of Sowerby Hall Farmhouse Park House Farmhouse Nos 1-13 (Consecutive), Sloop Street Tenements Nos 1-13 (Consecutive) Steamer Street Tenements Nos 1-9 (Consec), Devonshire Buildings, Island Road Mission & The Devonshire Public House Nos 10-14 (Consecutive), Devonshire Buildings Environment No significant Environmental Risk Sites identified within the Station area British Gas Plc, Bae Systems (Vsel) Ltd, Bae Systems Top Yard Area A, Bae Systems Devonshire Dock, Laporte Wood Protection Ltd, Partylite Manufacturing, Sovereign Chemical Industries Ltd, Bnfl Terminal, Lakeland Site Specific Risks Power, Urofoam Ltd Advanced Roofing Supplies, Centrica South, Centrica North, Furness General Hospital, Remploy Ltd, Robert Mcbride Group, United Utilities (Electricity) Depot Shanks Waste Solutions, CCW Manufacturing Ltd Flood Risk: Barrow is at risk of tidal flooding but on a low scale with a return Flooding period of approximately 1:200 years. Surface water flooding causes some localised risk to some properties. Of the 34 Super Out Put Areas that make up Barrow all are designated as Rurality Urban according to DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications.

96 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Activity per time of day

Activity on the station varies immensely depending on the time of day:

Barrow Appliances - all incidents attended in 8 hour blocks 01.04.2004 - 31.03.2009 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800

Number of Incidents 600 400 200 0 1-9pm 1-9am 2-10pm 3-11pm 2-10am 3-11am 5pm-1am 6pm-2am 7pm-3am 8pm-4am 9pm-5am 5am-1pm 6am-2pm 7am-3pm 8am-4pm 9am-5pm 4-Midnight 10pm-6am 11pm-7am 10am-6pm 11am-7pm 12noon-8pm 4am-12noon Midnight-8am

40P1 incidents in 8 hour periods 40P2 Incidents in 8 hour periods

Barrow Appliances - all incidents attended in 12 hour blocks 01.04.2004 - 31.03.2009 3000

2500

2000

1500

Number of Incidents 1000

500

0 0-Noon 1am-1pm 2am-2pm 3am-3pm 4am-4pm 5am-5pm 6am-6pm 7am-7pm 8am-8pm 9am-9pm 1pm-1am 2pm-2am 3pm-3am 4pm-4am 5pm-5am 6pm-6am 7pm-7am 8pm-8am 9pm-9am 10am-10pm 11am-11pm 12am-12pm 10pm-10am 11pm-11am

40P1 incidents in 12 hour periods 40P2 Incidents in 12 hour periods

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 97 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion:

Year on year incident are declining although calls to automatic fire alarms still remain high and give cause for concern. Dwelling fires are at their lowest since 2004/5 and there has also been a significant reduction in anti social rubbish fires.

There are 4 Super Output Areas classed as ‘high’ in terms of fire risk, with the majority of areas being classed as ‘medium’ or ‘low’ risk. The station area does have some significant heritage and industrial risks that require consideration.

98 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Bootle Resources

The Fire Station is located on the Main Street in Bootle village and houses one fire engine which is crewed by 10 retained firefighters.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Bootle Appliance had been off the run on 40 separate occasions for a combined total of 124 hours and 15 minutes.

Activity

Bootle’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 3 2 3 5 13 FAA 3 3 5 2 13 FAGI 2 1 2 2 7 FDR3 2 4 2 4 3 15 Dwelling Fire 1 2 3 Other Building Fire 4 2 1 1 8 Other Property Fire 1 1 1 3 Vehicle Fire 3 2 5 SSC Other 3 1 1 5 SSC RTC Related 2 2 3 1 2 10 Grand Total 13 22 15 12 20 82

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 99 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Bootle LOW 652 2 11 57 0 0 0 202 20 30.98

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Risk Total Total Failed Passed Category Excluded (2005-10) Standard (seconds) RISK SCORE 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA Average response time Average 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP to dwelling fires 2001-09 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st 16UEGF E01019259 32 L 900 791 L 2 1 1 Bootle

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Bootle Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Bootle:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Millom 46P1 17min 21s 8.15 Millom 46P2 20min 44s Broughton 42P1 10.72 18min 04s Seascale 09P1 13.14 24min 06s

100 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Other contextual information

Bootle is a small village situated in South Copeland approximately 24 miles south of Whitehaven and eight miles north of Millom. It has a population of approximately 1,300 people in an area that extends from Whitbeck to the mouth of the River Esk near Waberthwaite, however most of the population lives in the village of Bootle itself which is 2 miles inland.

Most of the population commute out of the area for employment, but the largest employer in the area is the DSA testing range at Eskmeals. The area has an unspoiled sandy coastline and the Eskmeals dunes are a nature reserve and are part of the coast special area of conservation.

The A595 trunk road runs directly through the village and can give the problems of road traffic accidents.

Bootle: Risk in station area Muncaster Castle Barnscar Romano-British Farmstead Grade II* listed: Heritage Seaton Hall, with attached ruins, Bootle United Reformed Church & two attached Houses to the east, Chapel Lane, Bootle Church of St John, Hall Waberthwaite Environment 7 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks MoD Eskmeals Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the one Super Out Put Rurality area that makes up Bootle is a “Village and Hamlet”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew are very low with some years averaging only 1 turnout per month. The Station area is classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have a number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire station is in Millom.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 101 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Broughton Resources

The original fire station was opened just after the end of the Second orldW War in the grounds of Broughton Tower Estate. The current station on Foxfield Road was opened in 1963 and is currently staffed by 11 firefighters employed on the retained duty system and has one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Broughton Appliance had been off the run on 12 separate occasions for a combined total of 12 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Broughton’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 1 6 2 2 3 14 FAA 4 1 1 1 7 FAGI 1 3 1 5 FAM 1 1 FDR3 5 3 2 9 19 Dwelling Fire 3 1 4 2 10 Other Building Fire 2 2 2 6 Other Property Fire 1 1 Vehicle Fire 3 3 2 8 SSC Other 1 1 SSC RTC Related 3 6 7 9 3 28 Grand Total 19 23 20 19 19 100

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

102 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Broughton LOW 1137 3 13 97 0 0 0 148 23 13.02

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New performance (2004/5 - SOA Risk 2008/9)

SOA NUMBER WARD (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) Average response time to dwelling Average 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st

16UGHC E01019344 24 L 900 874 L 4 1 3 Broughton 16UGHC E01019345 16 L 900 1213 L 2 2 Broughton

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Broughton Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Broughton:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 103 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Millom 46P2 7.82 22min 26s Coniston 43P1 9.39 29min 37s Ulverston 47P1 21min 12s 9.32 Ulverston 47P2 30min 01s

Other contextual information

The village of Broughton-in-Furness is situated in a conservation area within the Lake District National Park in south west Cumbria. The population of the village and surrounding rural area is approximately 2,500 people. The population increases significantly during the holiday season resulting in an increased sleeping risk.

The station provides fire cover to a remote rural area of approximately 1,0001 hectares, and is bounded by high fells to the north, east and west and the Duddon Estuary to the south.

The risks are mainly residential, however there are a number of hotels, guest houses and other types of holiday accommodation throughout the area. Industries include agriculture, forestry and slate quarrying. Firefighters attend a range of different types of incidents including barn fires, fell and forest fires. With the A595 and A5092 trunk roads running through the station area and the large number of minor and single track roads, the station attends a number of road traffic collisions each year.

Broughton: Risk in station area Swinside Stone Circle Grade I listed: Kirkby Hall, Kirkby Ireleth Grade II listed: Church of St Cuthbert, Kirkby Ireleth Heritage Duddon Iron Furnace Church of St John, Ulpha Broughton Tower Special School, Broughton Obelisk and Stocks, The Square, Broughton Ashlack Hall & Outbuilding, Kirkby Ireleth SPA: Duddon Estuary (SD180765) Environment 2 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks No significant Site Specific Risks identified within the Station area Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the two Super Output Rurality Areas that makes up Broughton are “Village and Hamlet”

104 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew are very low however there was a significant rise in rubbish/grass fires during 2008/9. The Station area is classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have a number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire stations are over 20 minutes travel distance away.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 105 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Coniston Resources

The old fire station was a wooden garage and petrol station requisitioned during the Second orldW War. A new fire station was opened in 1955 and is currently staffed by 10 firefighters employed on the retained duty system and has one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Coniston Appliance had been off the run on 41 separate occasions for a combined total of 140 hours.

Activity

Coniston’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 7 6 1 5 8 27 FAA 8 20 22 15 21 86 FAGI 2 2 3 3 2 12 FDR3 2 6 1 3 12 Dwelling Fire 2 3 3 5 1 14 Other Building Fire 5 2 1 8 Other Property Fire 3 1 4 Vehicle Fire 2 2 1 5 SSC Other 4 2 1 2 2 11 SSC RTC Related 2 2 1 2 1 8 Grand Total 32 43 37 34 41 187

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

106 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First

Coniston LOW 971 4 17 90 0 1 1 244 26 25.13 Hawkshead LOW 968 1 6 51 1 3 0 115 15 11.88

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st Average response time to Average 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA dwelling fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2001-09 fires dwelling 16UGHG E01019350 26 L 900 556 L 10 1 9 Coniston 16UGHL E01019356 48 M 600 1050 L 8 6 2 Hawkshead Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Coniston Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Coniston:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 107 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Ambleside 61P1 24 min 00s 7.77 Ambleside 61M1 33min 40s Broughton 42P1 9.39 18min 47s Windermere 70P1 11.99 22min 57s

Other contextual information

The village of Coniston is situated in the south of the Lake District National Park, nestling among the mountains at the head of Coniston Water. The population of the village and surrounding area is approximately 3,500 people. The population quadruples during the holiday season resulting in an increased sleeping risk.

The station provides fire cover to most of High Furness, a large remote rural area of approximately 20,000 hectares, including the picturesque conservation village of Hawkshead. The station area is bounded by high fells to the north and west, Windermere to the east and the agricultural land of the Rusland and Crake valleys to the south.

The risks are mainly residential, however there are a large number of hotels, guest houses, hostels, outward bound centres and other types of holiday accommodation throughout the area. Other industries include tourism, hill farming and forestry. Grizedale Forest covers a large part of the station area. There are two historic houses of national significance in the station area, Brantwood, the home of the Victorian philosopher and artist John Ruskin, and Hill Top, the home of the famous children's book writer Beatrix Potter.

The station attends a range of incidents from chimney fires to the rescue of large animals, farm fires, fell and forest fires. There are no trunk roads in the station area however there are a number of road traffic collisions every year on the congested, narrow, twisting roads around the lakes.

108 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Coniston: Risk in station area Grade I listed: Church of St Michael and All Saints, Hawkshead Grade II* listed: The Cragg, Cragg Cottage and Barn, Friends' Meeting House Hill Top, B5285 (South Side), Neat Sawrey Nibthwaite Mill, Nibthwaite, Colton Slater's Bridge, Little Langdale Brantwood, Coniston (including Lodge And Former Stable; Former Coach-House & Stable) Heritage Coniston Hall, Hawes Bank, Coniston Hawkshead Grammar School, Main Street, Hawkshead Anne Tyson's Cottage (Formerly listed as Wordsworth Lodge), Hawkshead Hawkshead Old Hall (Formerly listed as Hawkshead Hall), Hawkshead Hawkshead Courthouse (Formerly listed as Gatehouse at Hawkshead Hall), Hawkshead The Bield, Barn Adjacent to the Bield, Little Langdale Graythwaite Old Hall (Low ), Graythwaite Hoathwaite Farmhouse and Outbuildings, Coniston Environment 12 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks Centre For Ecology & Hydrology Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the two Super Rurality Out Put areas that makes up Coniston are “Village and Hamlet”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew are low with an average of around three turnouts per month over recent years. The Station area is classed as ‘low’ and ‘medium’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire station is in Ambleside but due to the narrow roads the closest supporting fire engines are some 20 minutes away.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 109 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Dalton Resources

Dalton Retained Fire Station is currently staffed by 13 firefighters working the retained duty system and who crew one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Dalton Appliance had been off the run on 458 separate occasions for a combined total of 1373 hours.

Activity

Dalton’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 1 5 4 8 8 26 FAA 28 23 29 28 27 135 FAGI 6 3 8 8 6 31 FAM 2 2 1 5 FDR3 13 28 23 15 11 90 Dwelling Fire 9 4 7 10 6 36 Other Building Fire 5 3 5 6 6 25 Other Property Fire 4 3 4 2 13 Vehicle Fire 2 7 3 4 5 21 SSC Other 10 2 3 3 4 22 SSC RTC Related 3 4 3 5 5 20 Grand Total 81 84 91 87 81 424

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

110 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Home Safety Visit Road Traffic Collisions Fires Prevention Activity 2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts in ward Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire % First visits Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC Dalton LOW 2846 1 16 114 0 2 0 447 54 15.71 North Dalton LOW 2740 1 14 89 0 4 3 370 25 13.50 South New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Risk Total Total Failed Passed Category Excluded (2005-10) Standard (seconds) Average response time Average RISK SCORE to dwelling fires 2001-09 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP

16UCFR E01019144 24 L 900 554 L 5 5 Dalton North 16UCFR E01019145 24 L 900 607 L 4 4 Dalton North 16UCFR E01019146 24 L 900 507 L 3 3 Dalton North 16UCFR E01019147 32 L 900 479 L 4 4 Dalton North 16UCFS E01019148 22 L 900 514 L 4 1 3 Dalton South 16UCFS E01019149 40 M 600 416 L 5 5 Dalton South 16UCFS E01019150 34 L 900 455 L 4 4 Dalton South 16UCFS E01019151 58 M 600 424 L 4 4 Dalton South

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 111 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Dalton Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Dalton:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Barrow 40P1 13min 20s 4.17 Barrow 40P2 10min 5s Ulverston 47P1 10min 20s 4.67 Ulverston 47P2 19min 13s Walney 5.74 N/A

Other contextual information

Dalton Risk in station area Grade I listed: Heritage Dalton Castle, Dalton in Furness Gleaston Castle, Gleaston Environment 2 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Colony Gift Corporation Site Specific Risks Poaka Beck Water Treatment Works Wcf Country Centre Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the two Rurality Super Out Put areas that makes up Dalton are “Town and Fringe”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average 80 – 90 per annum with no significant trends identified over recent years. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does two small areas classed as ‘medium’ risk. There are a small number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire stations are Barrow and Ulverston both being located within 5 miles of Dalton Station. A further Fire Engine is also available from Walney Island, 6 miles away.

112 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Grange Resources

The station has one fire engine and one Land Rover and is currently crewed with 13 retained firefighters. The Land Rover is a new addition to the fleet and replaced a fire engine in 2009.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Grange Retained Fire Engines had been off the run of the following occasions:

Grange 1 – 52 separate occasions for a combined total of 136 hours.

Grange 2 – 578 separate occasions for a combined total of 3122 hours and 30 minutes.

When Grange 1 appliance was off the run so too was the Grange 2 appliance and hence there would have been no fire cover provided during these times from Grange Fire Station.

Activity

Grange fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended will have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 5 5 5 4 9 28 FAA 37 34 41 37 33 182 FAGI 4 4 11 3 22 FAM 2 1 1 4 FDR3 5 10 9 14 10 48 Dwelling Fire 8 9 7 4 16 44 Other Building Fire 8 4 8 6 3 29 Other Property Fire 1 4 6 5 16 Vehicle Fire 1 3 4 5 5 18 SSC Other 7 3 5 9 7 31 SSC RTC Related 23 21 11 9 18 82 Grand Total 97 98 94 105 110 504

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 113 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Cartmel LOW 927 2 5 28 0 0 1 104 6 11.22 Grange LOW 2354 1 6 24 0 1 2 326 21 13.85 Holker LOW 883 0 2 9 0 1 0 107 9 12.12 Staveley-In- LOW 988 2 19 142 0 2 3 119 8 12.04 Cartmel

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

114 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New performance (2004/5 - SOA Risk 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) fires 2001-09 (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) Average response time to dwelling Average 2010 SOA Risk Category Risk SOA 2010 E01019349 16UGHF Cartmel 22 L 900 722 L 5 1 4 E01019353 16UGHK Grange 16 L 900 366 L 2 2 E01019354 16UGHK Grange 32 L 900 410 L 7 7 E01019355 16UGHK Grange 18 L 900 420 L 5 2 3 E01019357 16UGHM Holker 20 L 900 606 L 2 2 16UGJN Staveley- E01019386 36 M 600 1056 L 4 4 in-Cartmel

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Grange Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Grange:

Station Name Distance by Road Average attendance time Kendal 60P2 14.30 22min 29s Milnthorpe 66P1 11.55 23min 49s Ulverston 47P2 12.89 17min 34s

Other contextual information

As Grange is a coastal town on the estuary, over the years the station has attended numerous rescues of people and also animals that have become stuck in the quicksand. In addition to this the proximity of the sea often leads to some localised flooding. The main A590 trunk road runs through the station area and as this is one of the most notorious roads in the county for road traffic collisions, this is a significant part of the firefighters duty today.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 115 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Grange: Risk in station area Stott Park Bobbin Mill Rusland Tannery Grade I listed: Priory Church of St Mary, Cartmel Grade II* listed: Cark Hall, North Cottage and South Cottage, Cark in Cartmel Priory Close House, Cartmel Priory Gatehouse, including east bay of Gatehouse, Cartmel Wraysholme Tower, Flookburgh Heritage Canon Winder Hall, Flookburgh Church of St John Baptist, Flookburgh No 30 (Manor House) Market Street and adjoining outbuildings, Flookburgh Netherwood Hotel, Grange over Sands Holker Hall and terrace wall approx 70m to garden to south- east, Holker Church of St Peter, Field Broughton Newby Bridge over river, Newby Bridge Environment 10 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Vitagrass Farms Ltd Site Specific Risks Ceh, Merlewood Windermere Road often floods in response to intense rainfall, the combination of ground water, surface water and surcharging Flooding water courses with approximately 26 properties at risk, with a mix of residential, Bed and Breakfast accommodation and commercial premises. According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the five Rurality Super Output areas that makes up Grange 3 are “Town and Fringe” and 2 are “Village and Hamlet”.

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 100 per annum with a significant increase in dwelling fires seen during 2008/9 over recent years.The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary.

116 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Millom Resources

Millom Station houses one fire engine and one Land Rover which are crewed by 18 retained firefighters. The Land Rover is a new addition to the fleet and replaced a fire engine in 2009.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Millom Retained Fire Engines had been off the run of the following occasions:

Millom 1 – 8 separate occasions for a combined total of 26 hours and 45 minutes.

Millom 2 – 225 separate occasions for a combined total of 925 hours.

When Millom 1 appliance was off the run so too was the Millom 2 appliance and hence there would have been no fire cover provided during these times from Millom Fire Station.

Activity

Millom fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 6 4 2 3 1 16 FAA 11 15 19 6 21 72 FAGI 2 7 9 12 10 40 FAM 3 6 2 1 3 15 FDR3 22 37 32 42 29 162 Dwelling Fire 18 9 9 3 4 43 Other Building Fire 6 28 28 47 24 133 Other Property Fire 3 1 4 8 2 18 Vehicle Fire 4 7 3 2 3 19 SSC Other 4 7 3 8 5 27 SSC RTC Related 5 4 14 10 3 36 Grand Total 84 125 125 142 105 581

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 117 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First Haverigg LOW 618 0 0 4 0 2 3 153 8 24.76 Holborn Hill LOW 1162 1 0 14 0 0 0 315 22 27.11 Millom Without LOW 662 3 29 90 0 1 0 125 4 18.88 Newtown MEDIUM 1711 0 5 23 0 1 1 592 42 34.60

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

118 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA NUMBER WARD (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA Average response time to dwelling Average 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st

16UEGS E01019283 62 M 600 491 L Haverigg 16UEGW E01019289 32 L 900 394 L 2 2 Holborn Hill 16UEGW E01019290 28 L 900 358 L 4 4 Holborn Hill 16UEGY E01019293 Millom 28 L 900 658 L 5 5 Without 16UEHB E01019298 28 L 900 329 M 2 2 Newtown 16UEHB E01019299 44 M 600 349 M 9 9 Newtown

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Millom Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Millom:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Broughton 42P1 7.82 15min 44s Bootle 41P1 8.17 21min 39s Coniston 43P1 16.53 N/A

Other contextual information

Millom is a small coastal town situated in the most southerly part in Copeland district. It is separated from the Furness peninsular by the Duddon Estuary and is bounded to the west by the Irish Sea.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 119 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

There is a small industrial estate on the outskirts of the town; however the main industries within the area are agriculture an expanding tourist trade. The town has two nature reserves and the Duddon estuary is a sight of Special Scientific Interest.

Close to the town is HM Prison Haverigg, the only prison in the County and the station responds to a significant number of calls to these premises each year .

The A595 trunk road passes through the station area and this can lead to problems with road traffic collisions

Millom: Risk in station area Grade I listed: Heritage Millom Castle Church of Holy Trinity Environment 1 Site of Specific Scientific Interest Haverigg Prison Site Specific Risks Langthwaite Farm No significant Flood Risk identified within the Flooding Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 6 Super Out Put areas that Rurality make up Grange; 4 are “Town and Fringe” and 2 are “Village and Hamlet”.

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew can fluctuate significantly between years. There tends to be high fluctuations in ‘other building fires’ which are mainly attributable to the local Prison. Last year calls reduced to around 100. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have two areas classed as ‘medium’ risk. Heritage and Environmental risks are low within the station boundary.

120 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Ulverston Resources

The original fire station was built in 1886, and is still in use by Ulverston St. John'sAmbulance Brigade. The current station was opened in 1974 and is staffed by 19 firefighters employed on the retained duty system and has two fire engines.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Ulverston Retained Appliances had been off the run of the following occasions:

Ulverston 1 – 2 separate occasions for a combined total of 5 hours.

Ulverston 2 – 224 separate occasions for a combined total of 570 hours and 45 minutes.

When Ulverston 1 appliance was off the run so too was the Ulverston 2 appliance and hence there would have been no fire cover provided during these times from Ulverston Fire Station.

Activity

Ulverston fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 6 7 9 15 14 51 FAA 50 55 66 50 62 283 FAGI 16 19 13 13 12 73 FAM 4 1 2 1 8 FDR3 26 21 41 36 32 156 Dwelling Fire 20 19 29 17 11 96 Other Building Fire 6 11 6 10 13 46 Other Property Fire 7 3 4 2 6 22 Vehicle Fire 7 6 7 6 2 28 SSC Other 9 9 7 17 12 54 SSC RTC Related 18 25 31 26 14 114 Grand Total 169 176 215 193 178 931

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 121 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Home Safety Road Traffic Fires Visit Prevention Collisions Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First

Crake Valley LOW 858 2 8 148 1 0 0 75 3 8.74 Low Furness & LOW 1916 6 15 95 0 3 0 233 13 12.16 Swarthmoor Ulverston Central MEDIUM 816 0 4 31 0 0 4 126 21 15.44 Ulverston East MEDIUM 998 0 2 20 0 0 0 114 13 11.42 Ulverston North MEDIUM 972 0 3 14 0 1 0 152 6 15.64 Ulverston South LOW 758 0 2 11 0 2 0 88 9 11.61 Ulverston Town MEDIUM 1118 0 4 66 0 1 2 172 17 15.38 Ulverston West LOW 924 1 0 42 0 0 0 110 13 11.90

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

122 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New performance (2004/5 - SOA Risk 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) Average response time to dwelling Average 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st

16UGHH Crake E01019351 20 L 900 615 L 4 4 Valley 16UGJH Low E01019378 Furness & 22 L 900 478 L 4 4 Swarthmoor 16UGJH Low E01019379 Furness & 20 L 900 706 L 6 6 Swarthmoor 16UGJH Low E01019380 Furness & 52 M 600 653 L 5 5 Swarthmoor 16UGJQ Ulverston E01019388 52 M 600 414 M 9 1 1 7 Central 16UGJR Ulverston E01019389 38 M 600 401 M 7 7 East 16UGJS Ulverston E01019390 20 L 900 364 M 4 4 North 16UGJT Ulverston E01019391 28 L 900 438 L 3 3 South 16UGJU Ulverston E01019392 44 M 600 312 M 12 12 Town 16UGJW Ulverston E01019393 16 L 900 414 L 5 1 4 West

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Ulverston Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Ulverston:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 123 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Dalton 44P1 4.67 15min 16s Barrow 40P1 13min 57s 8.60 Barrow 40P2 10min 49s Broughton 42P1 9.32 28min 44s

Other contextual information

The market town of Ulverston is situated on the busy A590 trunk road in the centre of the Furness Peninsula in the south of the county. The population of the town is approximately 11,500 people, with a further 5,000 people living in the surrounding villages and countryside.

The station provides fire cover to the town and parts of High and Low Furness, a rural area of approximately 10,000 hectares, and is bounded by fells to the north and west, farmland to the south and Morecambe Bay to the east.

The main industry in the town is the GlaxoSmithKline pharmaceutical production plant. There are a number of electronic, light engineering and specialist engineering factories in the town together with hotels, guest houses and other types of holiday accommodation throughout the area. Other industries include farming (the Agricultural and Livestock Market is held every Thursday) and forestry.

Rescue of large animals, farm and barn fires are a part of the station workload. Firefighters have also been involved with the RNLI, Coastguard and other agencies in rescues from the sand and mud flats of Morecambe Bay and also attending some severe flooding incidnets in recent years. Firefighters attend a large number of road traffic collisions, mainly on the busyA590, the main route into south Cumbria.

124 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Ulverston: Risk in Station Area Grade I listed: Church of St Mary and St Michael, Gt Urswick Grade II* listed: Church of St Cuthbert, Aldingham Newland Blast Furnace and attached ancillary buildings, Newland Plumton Hall, Plumton Church of St Mary, Ulverston Heritage Conishead Priory, Ulverston Swarthmoor Hall, Ulverston Barrow Monument, Ulverston Friend's Meeting House, Ulverston Rook How Friends’ Meeting House and Cottage, Rusland Church of St Peter, Finsthwaite Lowick Hall, Lowick Environment 4 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Ashley & Rock, George Barker & Sons Ltd, Glaxosmithkline Marl International Ltd Oxley Site Specific Risks Developments Co Ltd Tronic Electronic Services Ltd Dragley Beck runs through parts of Ulverston and has caused localised flooding to parts of Flooding the Town, mainly around the North Road and Steel Street areas. According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 10 Super Out Put areas that Rurality make up Ulverston; 6 are “Urban”, 1 is “Town and Fringe” and 3 are “Village and Hamlet”.

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew average around 180 per annum with a slight decrease in recent years. In 2008/9 there was also a significant decline in the number of dwelling fires and RTCs attended by the Station. The Station area is classed as ‘medium’ and ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk and it does have a number of flood, industrial, heritage and environmental risk within the station boundary.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 125 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Walney Resources

Walney has a two bay fire station that was built in 1974 and was staffed as a ‘day crewed’ station until 1991 when it became retained. The station is currently staffed with 13 retained firefighters who crew one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Walney Appliance had been off the run on 57 separate occasions for a combined total of 89 hours.

Activity

Walney’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas:

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 1 3 1 5 FAA 19 15 35 23 38 130 FAGI 7 2 4 6 5 24 FAM 2 1 2 1 1 7 FDR3 27 13 9 16 14 79 Dwelling Fire 10 6 5 6 14 41 Other Building Fire 6 3 8 3 13 33 Other Property Fire 2 2 3 1 8 Vehicle Fire 3 1 1 3 8 SSC Other 7 3 2 1 13 SSC RTC Related 1 2 2 5 Grand Total 84 47 71 62 89 353

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

126 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC % First visits in

Walney HIGH 2560 0 3 26 1 0 1 745 86 29.10 North Walney MEDIUM 2529 0 12 43 0 5 4 606 65 23.96 South

New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Risk Total Total Failed Passed Category Excluded (2005-10) Standard (seconds) RISK SCORE 2010 SOA Risk 2010 SOA Average response time Average 2006 IRMP Ward Ward 2006 IRMP to dwelling fires 2001-09 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st

16UCGB E01019180 36 M 600 292 H 1 1 Walney North 16UCGB E01019181 36 M 600 357 H 4 3 1 Walney North 16UCGB E01019182 28 L 900 336 H 4 1 3 Walney North 16UCGB E01019183 40 M 600 348 H 8 6 2 Walney North 16UCGC E01019184 52 M 600 341 M 8 8 Walney South 16UCGC E01019185 26 L 900 375 M 6 6 Walney South 16UCGC E01019186 54 M 600 303 M 9 9 Walney South 16UCGC E01019187 68 M 600 386 M 4 4 Walney South

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 127 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Walney Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Walney:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Barrow 40P1 6min 56s 2.13 Barrow 40P2 7min 31s Dalton 44P1 5.74 15min 16s Ulverston 47P1 10.64 20min 28s

Other contextual information

Walney is situated on an island in the Irish Sea off the Cumbrian coast. The island is 11 miles long and 1 mile across at its widest point and is linked to the mainland at Barrow in Furness by Jubilee Bridge that spans Walney Channel. The channel is still navigational and Jubilee Bridge must be raised to allow passage of commercial and pleasure craft.

Over 11,000 people live on Walney Island in 5,000 households making the area mainly residential, although schools and nursing homes are situated there together with an airfield at the north end of the island and a large caravan site at the south.

Walney Risk in station area Grade II* listed: Heritage Walney Lighthouse with two attached cottages and outbuildings. Environment 1 Site of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks No Site Specific Risks identified within the Station area Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 8 Super Out Rurality Put areas that make up Walney are all “Urban”

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the Walney fire station crew average around 80 per annum with a significant number of calls on the Island being attended by crews from Barrow. In 2008/9 there was a significant increase in the number of dwelling fires and other building fires attended by the Station. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘medium’ in terms of likely fire risk, with two pockets of ‘low’ risk within the area.

128 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Kendal Resources

Kendal Fire Station is situated near the centre of the town on Busher Walk, near to the County Hall and next to the Police station. The station has an establishment of 12 regular firefighters, including two crew managers on a two-watch 12 hour duty system, supplemented by a retained crew of 21 firefighters.

The station has two fire engines, a major rescue vehicle and the County's only High olumeV Pump (HVP). Kendal is permanantly staffed for 12 hours each day, during the peak activity periods of 8am – 8pm by regular firefighters (with support for the second fire engine from retained staff) and the retained crew provide cover for all of the appliances during the other 12 hours.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Kendal Retained Fire Engines had been off the run of the following occasions:

Kendal 1 – 2 separate occasions for a combined total of 1 hours and 15 minutes.

Kendal 2 – 4 separate occasions for a combined total of 2 hours and 45 minutes.

When Kendal 1 appliance was off the run so too was the Kendal 2 appliance and hence there would have been no fire cover provided during these times from Kendal Fire Station.

Activity

Kendal fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 13 18 11 12 14 68 FAA 191 179 165 144 146 825 FAGI 44 30 38 27 43 182 FAM 6 11 8 8 4 37 FDR3 77 64 68 60 56 325 OBAT 1 1 2 1 5 Dwelling Fire 33 39 33 40 47 192 Other Building Fire 28 19 16 22 19 104 Other Property Fire 11 11 9 7 9 47 Vehicle Fire 23 23 36 15 15 112 SSC Other 49 39 41 42 51 222 SSC RTC Related 36 45 54 38 35 208 Grand Total 512 479 481 415 440 2327

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 129 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First Burneside LOW 957 2 10 59 0 0 1 158 12 16.51 Kendal Castle MEDIUM 820 0 1 10 0 2 0 122 13 14.88 Kendal Far Cross MEDIUM 921 0 2 30 0 0 1 207 30 22.48 Kendal Fell MEDIUM 1103 1 10 60 0 3 5 164 25 14.87 Kendal LOW 822 0 3 16 0 0 0 112 17 13.63 Glebelands Kendal Heron Hill LOW 915 0 1 8 0 0 0 210 16 22.95 Kendal Highgate MEDIUM 976 0 3 26 0 0 0 167 15 17.11 Kendal Kirkland MEDIUM 874 0 2 9 0 2 2 226 17 25.86 Kendal Mintsfeet LOW 980 1 7 75 0 1 3 163 20 16.63 Kendal Nether LOW 807 0 0 19 0 1 0 186 23 23.05 Kendal LOW 1126 0 5 49 0 0 0 192 15 17.05 Kendal Parks LOW 883 0 0 1 0 0 0 167 13 18.91 Kendal LOW 888 0 3 7 0 0 1 226 31 25.45 Stonecross Kendal Strickland LOW 1105 0 0 28 0 1 1 170 22 15.38 Kendal Underley MEDIUM 941 0 1 14 0 3 1 182 20 19.34 Natland LOW 932 2 8 70 0 1 0 114 6 12.23 Whinfell LOW 968 9 65 258 0 4 1 189 8 19.52 New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

130 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New performance (2004/5 - SOA Risk 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) Average response time to dwelling Average 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st

E01019346 16UGHD Burneside 30 L 900 547 L 7 2 5 16UGHN Kendal E01019358 22 L 900 368 M 5 5 Castle 16UGHP Kendal Far E01019359 24 L 900 320 M 3 3 Cross E01019360 16UGHQ Kendal Fell 68 M 600 307 M 16 16 16UGHR Kendal E01019361 16 L 900 289 L 2 2 Glebelands 16UGHS Kendal E01019362 20 L 900 403 L 9 9 Heron Hill 16UGHT Kendal E01019363 28 L 900 378 M 8 1 2 5 Highgate 16UGHU Kendal E01019364 52 M 600 384 M 16 2 14 Kirkland 16UGHW Kendal E01019365 42 M 600 370 L 12 1 11 Mintsfeet 16UGHX Kendal E01019366 20 L 900 381 L 6 6 Nether 16UGHY Kendal E01019367 24 L 900 399 L 9 9 Oxenholme 16UGHZ Kendal E01019368 16 L 900 395 L Parks 16UGJA Kendal E01019369 16 L 900 366 L 7 7 Stonecross 16UGJB Kendal E01019370 36 M 600 212 L 6 6 Strickland 16UGJC Kendal E01019371 32 L 900 278 M 11 11 Underley E01019383 16UGJL Natland 18 L 900 687 L 4 4 E01019394 16UGJX Whinfell 36 M 600 1311 L 4 1 2 1

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 131 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Kendal Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Kendal:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Staveley 69P1 4.43 14min 09s Milnthorpe 66P1 7.99 14min 01s Windermere 70P2 8.39 11min 13s

Other contextual information

Kendal is situated in the south east of Cumbria and is mainly an industrial town formed by many small industries with a population of around 33,000. The towns' ideal location means that it attracts a large transient population of holiday makers on their way to the Lakes increasing the sleeping risk particularly during the holiday seasons. In the recent past, the towns' success was mainly due to businesses like shoe manufacturing and the insurance industry, now however, the town continues to be successful by way of a varied industrial work-base.

132 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Kendal Risk in station area Kendal Castle Grade I listed: Sizergh Castle Abbot Hall Art Gallery Church of the Holy Trinity Castle Dairy Grade II* listed: Stables and attached barn to South of Sizergh Castle No 128, Highgate Hotel Nos 26 & 28 Highgate with entrance to Yard 24 Nos 13, 15, 17, 17A, & 19 Stricklandgate Church of Holy Trinity & St George No 7 (includes 9 and 11) Stramongate Heritage Wattsfield Farmhouse & Cottage Nos 39, 43, 45, 45A, & entrance to Yard 41 Branthwaite Brow, Market Place Helsington Laithes farmhouse No 2, Shop and adjoining public conveniences Police Yard, Yard 31 Gilthwaiterigg Collinfield farmhouse Friends' Meeting House Nether Levens Farmhouse and attached store to North Old stables approx 50m North-East of Levens Hall, cottages attached to North-West and South; and gate piers attached to North-East corner Church of St Mark, Natland Blease Hall, Old Hutton Selside Hall and attached outbuilding Burneside Hall, Burneside Environment 7 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Watchgate Water Treatment Works Westmorland General Hospital Furmanite International Ltd Site Specific Risks Farleys Health Products James Cropper Westmorland Shopping Centre National Grid Sub Station The Flood Risk area covers approximately 9.4 Km2 from James Cropper paper mill in Burneside village to Helsington Mills at the southern extremity of Kendal. The Kent rises in the hills surrounding Kentmere and flows only a short distance of 32Km before entering the sea at the Northen End of Flooding Morecambe Bay. The Kent has three main tributaries joining upstream of the town, the Mint, Sprint and Gowan. The flood catchment is predominantly rural apart from the urban area of Kendal whose early industry developed alongsde the banks of the Kent. There are almost 1500 properties at risk. According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 17 Super Out Put Rurality areas that make up Kendal 14 are “Urban” and 3 are “ Village and Hamlet”

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 133 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Activity per time of day:

Response activity from Kendal Fire Station varies immensely depending on the time of day:

134 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion:

There has been a gradual decline in the total number of incidents attended with average levels per annum at around 450. There has been a rise in dwelling fires over the period of analysis but a significant reduction in RTCs and calls to automatic fire alarm activations. The Station area is predominantly categorised as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have five Super Output Areas classed as ‘medium’ risk. There are a significant number of heritage and environmental risks, and flooding continues to present a risk to many properties situated near the river flood planes. There are also several industrial risks within the station area.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 135 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Ambleside Resources

The current fire station has been on its existing site since 1962.Ambleside received two brand new fire appliances in 2009; a type ‘B’ fire engine and a Land Rover, which is necessary to negotiate the narrow roads and more remote areas of Ambleside, Grasmere and beyond. The crew at Ambleside have received specialist training and now possess the knowledge and equipment to respond with the new Land Rover to Wildfires. The station is currently crewed by 14 firefighters working the retained duty system.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Ambleside Fire Engine had been off the run on 23 separate occasions for a combined total of 77 hours and 45 minutes.

Activity

Ambleside’s fire engine has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 7 8 4 4 4 27 FAA 78 78 78 53 55 342 FAGI 6 5 3 3 7 24 FAM 3 2 2 1 2 10 FDR3 7 9 7 11 6 40 Dwelling Fire 6 5 8 14 3 36 Other Building Fire 7 3 12 5 13 40 Other Property Fire 2 2 2 6 Vehicle Fire 2 5 3 1 11 SSC Other 7 3 8 4 4 26 SSC RTC Related 9 6 1 7 3 26 Grand Total 132 124 128 105 99 588

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

136 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Lakes LOW 1817 2 11 57 0 3 2 212 17 11.67 Ambleside Lakes LOW 929 2 5 44 0 0 3 57 2 6.14 Grasmere

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) fires 2001-09 (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA Average response time to dwelling Average

16UGJE E01019374 Lakes 26 L 900 505 L 4 4 Ambleside 16UGJE E01019375 Lakes 58 M 600 601 L 8 8 Ambleside 16UGJF E01019376 Lakes 42 M 600 871 L 5 1 4 Grasmere

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 137 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Ambleside Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Ambleside:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Windermere 70P1 14min 39s 5.34 Windermere 70P2 16min 58s Coniston 43P1 7.77 23min 39s Staveley 69P1 8.66 N/A

Other contextual information

Ambleside Fire Station is in the heart of the Lake District National Park, only 100 metres from the famous Bridge House over Stock Beck. As Ambleside is an internationally renowned holiday destination the main risk is the significant number of hotels and boarding houses within the area which increases the resident population by up to 20,000 at peak times in the summer.

138 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Ambleside: Risk in station area High Street Roman Road Gaitscale Farmstead Grade I listed: Bridge House, Rydal Road, Ambleside Rydal Mount, Rydal Dove Cottage at Town End, Grasmere Brimmer Head Farm House (with adjacent farm building), Grasmere Church of St Oswald, Grasmere Borran’s Field, Ambleside Grade II* listed: R.M.S. Wray Castle Church Of St Mary, Ambleside Heritage Gatehouse At Croft Hotel, Clappersgate Fox How, Rydal Wordsworth Group Of Graves Goodybridge House & Attached Barn, Grasmere Walthwaite and buildings attached, Chapel Stile Church Of St Mary, Rydal The Nab (Formerly listed as Nab Cottage), Rydal Rydal Hall (including terraces to South; Barns and stables to North; Summer House; Game Larder; and Ice House), Rydal Bridge Over Rydal Beck (in grounds of Rydal Hall), Rydal The Brow, Skelwith Fold Bull Close, Skelwith Fold Environment 11 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Dunmail Raise WTW Site Specific Waterside Hotel Risks Ambleside Youth Hostel Ambleside is situated to the North end of Lake Windermere with a number of businesses situated on the Lake front. In recent years high levels of rainfall Flooding have swelled the lake with localised flooding causing severed damage to nearby properties. Flooding continues to pose a significant risk with Stock Ghyll,The River Rothay and Fisher Beck potentially placing over 250 properties at risk. According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 3 Super Out Put areas Rurality that make up Ambleside 2 are “Town and Fringe” and 1 is “Village and Hamlet”.

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew have seen a gradual decline in recent years. The station now averages around 100 incidents per annum, however, a significant proportion of these continue to be responding to unwanted false alarm activations. The Station area is classed as ‘medium’ and ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk and it does have a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. There is also a significant increase in ‘sleeping risk’ during the tourist months. The nearest alternative fire station is situated just over five miles away in Windermere.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 139 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Appleby Resources

The original fire station was situated on The Sands, next to the River Eden which flows through the town centre; this has now been converted into a dwelling. A new fire station was built in the late fifties with then modern facilities and houses one fire engine and a Land Rover suited to traverse around the narrow rural county roads. The station is currently crewed by 14 firefighters working the retained duty system.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Appleby Fire Engine had been off the run 9 separate occasions for a combined total of 38 hours and 15 minutes.

Activity

Appleby’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 12 10 2 6 7 37 FAA 4 11 8 10 6 39 FAGI 3 5 4 1 4 17 FAM 2 5 2 9 FDR3 3 7 5 6 3 24 Dwelling Fire 5 7 10 2 3 27 Other Building Fire 12 7 6 2 7 34 Other Property Fire 4 5 4 3 1 17 Vehicle Fire 6 2 4 4 6 22 SSC Other 9 9 7 5 4 34 SSC RTC Related 6 10 7 10 12 45 Grand Total 66 78 57 51 53 305

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

140 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity 2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC % First visits in

Appleby LOW 714 0 0 18 0 0 0 129 12 18.07 (Appleby) Appleby LOW 783 0 6 16 0 1 0 94 5 12.01 (Bongate) Long Marton LOW 576 6 3 43 0 0 0 56 2 9.72 Warcop LOW 606 1 7 71 1 5 0 44 7.26 New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New SOA Dwelling Fire response Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) Average response time to dwelling Average 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st

16UFGG E01019306 Appleby 20 L 900 341 L 1 1 (Appleby) 16UFGH E01019307 Appleby 16 L 900 390 L 4 4 (Bongate) 16UFGY E01019323 20 L 900 615 L 2 2 Long Marton 16UFHM E01019340 56 M 600 720 L 2 2 Warcop

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 141 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Appleby Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Appleby:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time 65P1 10.39 27min 29s Shap 68P1 11.17 22min 50s Penrith 27P1 19min 57s 12.95 Penrith 27P2 17min 33s

If required, additional support into Appleby is available from Durham FRS with Barnard Castle Fire Station (1 fire engine) 27 miles away.

Other contextual information

Appleby, the old county town of Westmorland, is situated in East Cumbria in a rural location. The fire station covers approximately a seven mile radius which includes a large farming community and is also divided by the notorious A66 trunk road.

Being in a very rural location the majority of incidents involve farm fires, the usual domestic incidents, and because of the locality of the A66, road traffic collisions represent a high percentage of our turnouts.

Notable incidents over the years include two RAF Tornadoes colliding near the small village of Milburn with the sad loss of all four aircrew.

142 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Appleby: Risk in station area Grade I listed: Parish Church of St Lawrence Lady Anne's Bee-house, in copse to north-east of former stable block at Appleby Castle Nos.1 and 2 Castle Park, The Flat, Castle Park, and Former coach-houses and stables, Castle Park Gateway to Appleby Castle courtyard, Gatehouse Cottage, and Castle Moat Cottage Main Building of Appleby Castle Caesar's Tower at Appleby Castle Grange Hall and adjoining buildings, Asby Parish Church of St Columba, Warcop Church of All Saints, Bolton Church of St Margaret & St James, Long Marton Church of St James, Bandleyside Howgill Castle, Milburn Grade II* listed: High Cross, Boroughgate Rear wing to east of No 27 and The White House, Boroughgate Low Cross, Boroughgate No 30 Boroughgate Heritage Lamp Post on north side of High Cross, Boroughgate Nos 63 to 66 (Consec), Moot Hall, Boroughgate The Cloisters, Boroughgate Church of St Michael Nos 1-5 (consec) and Nos 7-13 (consec), St Anne's Hospital and Chapel at St Anne's Hospital, Boroughgate Well to east of Grange Hall, Asby Gaythorne Hall, Asby Warcop Hall, Warcop Bank barn to north- west of Barwise Hall, Bandleyside Brackenber Hall and adjoining garage, Murton Nether Hoff farmhouse, Colby Crackenthorpe Hall, Crackenthorpe Holesfoot House, Crosby Ravensworth Drybeck Hall and attached buildings, Bandleyside Asby Hall, area railings and central gate, Asby Old Rectory, Asby Ormside Hall and adjoining barns, Bandleyside Kirkby Thore Hall, Kirkby Thore Church of St Michael, Kirkby Thore Murton Hall, adjoining store, and area wall to rear, Murton Warcop Old Bridge over River Eden to south-west of Eden Gate, Warcop Environment 8 Sites of Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks No significant Site Specific Risks identified within the Station area The Town of Appleby is situated where the River Eden turns through two 180-degree bends. A large portion of the development in the town has taken place on the natural floodplain enclosed by the river. Appleby suffers frequent flood damage with undefended properties in the Sands being particularly Flooding vulnerable. There are approximately 331 properties within the risk zone, including properties on the Sands (undefended) where the Police Station and properties on Chapel Street (east bank defended), where the Fire Station and Edenside Old Peoples Home are situated. According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 4 Super Out Put Rurality areas that make up Appleby 2 are “Town and Fringe” and 2 are “Village and Hamlet”.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 143 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew have reduced gradually over the last five years and now average 50 – 60 per annum. Dwelling fires remain low however TCsR continue to be a concern. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have one small pocket of ‘medium’ risk within its station boundary. There are a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station area and flooding is a significant risk to many properties. The nearest supporting fire station is over 10 miles away and average supporting attendance times are over 20 minutes due to the rural road network.

144 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Arnside Resources

The current fire station was built in 1960 and is now staffed by 10 firefighters working the retained duty system who crew a Volvo Compact fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Arnside Appliance had been off the run on 42 separate occasions for a combined total of 87 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Arnside’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Grand Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Total Chimney - Dwelling 1 1 2 2 6 FAA 7 5 12 2 5 31 FAGI 1 4 5 FDR3 2 7 2 2 13 OBAT 2 2 Dwelling Fire 2 1 1 4 5 13 Other Building Fire 1 1 2 1 3 8 Other Property Fire 1 4 1 6 Vehicle Fire 2 1 3 SSC Other 1 4 3 4 4 16 SSC RTC Related 3 2 1 3 3 12 Grand Total 18 21 28 21 27 115

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 145 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First

Arnside & LOW 2121 0 9 50 0 1 1 325 23 15.32 Beetham

New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA NUMBER WARD Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) fires 2001-09 (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA Average response time to dwelling Average 16UGHB E01019341 Arnside & 16 L 900 224 L Beetham 16UGHB E01019342 Arnside & 18 L 900 564 L 1 1 Beetham 16UGHB E01019343 Arnside & 24 L 900 536 L 3 3 Beetham

146 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Arnside Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Arnside:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Milnthorpe 66P1 4.00 10min 04s Kendal (60P1/60P2) 11.71 N/A 64P1 12.00 N/A

Additional support into Arnside is available from Lancashire FRS, with Silverdale Fire Station (1 fire engine) 3 miles away and Carnforth Fire Station (1 fire engine) 7 miles away.

Other contextual information

Arnside is a large village with a population of around 3000, situated on the Kent estuary in the south-west of the county.

One particular problem for the local station is rescues from the notorious quicksand in and around the Kent estuary area. Over the years many people have been rescued by the fire and rescue servicel when they have underestimated the danger of walking along the beaches. Although a relatively quiet area, a significant risk within the station area is a Cumbrian coast rail line, which, in addition to passenger and freight services, carries nuclear flasks en-route to Sellafield andest W Cumbria.

Arnside Risk in station area Bridge House Heritage Grade II* listed: Arnside Tower SPA: Morecambe Bay SD375700 Environment 4 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risk Cumbria coast rail line Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 3 Super Rurality Out Put Areas that make up Arnside 1 is “Town and Fringe” and 2 are “Village and Hamlet”.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 147 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

Total incidents attended by the fire station crew are very low and average around only 2 per month although there has been an increase in dwelling fires in recent years.The majority of dwelling fires are out before the arrival of the fire crews. The Station area is classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk. There are a number of environmental risks within the station boundary and the nearest alternative fire station is only 4 miles away in Milnthorpe. The often treacherous sands around the Kent Estuary sometimes catch walkers unaware and crews are called to affect rescues. There are effective arrangements in place with other partner agencies such as Bay Search and Rescue and Arnside Coastguard Rescue Team to assist with such incidents.

148 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Kirkby-Lonsdale Resources

The station is located on New Road and is staffed by 10 retained firefighters and has one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Kirkby Lonsdale Appliance had been off the run on 67 separate occasions for a combined total of 284 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Kirkby Lonsdale’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 1 4 3 7 15 FAA 5 5 8 7 8 33 FAGI 1 3 1 3 2 10 FAM 2 1 3 FDR3 3 2 3 2 1 11 OBAT 3 3 Dwelling Fire 2 3 6 5 2 18 Other Building Fire 3 2 1 1 7 Vehicle Fire 2 2 1 5 SSC Other 2 4 2 4 4 16 SSC RTC Related 5 1 7 2 6 21 Grand Total 23 21 35 29 34 142

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 149 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity 2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC % First visits in Burton & LOW 1310 2 7 62 0 1 0 127 8 9.69 Holme Crooklands LOW 947 2 26 124 1 2 0 150 11 15.84 Kirkby LOW 1245 1 10 41 0 0 1 236 13 18.96 Lonsdale New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st Average response time to Average 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA dwelling fires 2001-09 (seconds)

16UGHE E01019347 Burton & 16 L 900 646 L 3 3 Holme 16UGHE E01019348 Burton & 46 M 600 790 L 6 2 4 Holme 16UGHJ E01019352 24 L 900 727 L 3 1 2 Crooklands 16UGJD E01019372 Kirkby 36 M 600 335 L 10 2 8 Lonsdale 16UGJD E01019373 Kirkby 24 L 900 606 L 5 1 4 Lonsdale

150 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Kirkby Lonsdale Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Kirkby Lonsdale:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Milnthorpe 66P1 8.99 18min 41s Kendal 60P2 12.97 20min 12s 67P1 11.32 14min 51s

If required, additional support into Kirkby Lonsdale is available from North Yorkshire FRS and Lancashire FRS, with Bentham Fire Station (1 fire engine) 11 miles away and Hornby Fire Station (1 fire engine) 8 miles away.

Other contextual information

Kirkby Lonsdale is a small town in south east Cumbria with a population of approximately 2,500 people. The town is situated in a beautiful location by the River Lune and is a favourite location for day trippers and holiday makers.

The town has a busy retail industry from where many of the local firefighters are recruited.The fire station responds to various types of emergencies such as swift water incidents in the river, road traffic collisions on the busy 'A' road which crosses the County boundary, barn fires and the rescue of entrapped farm animals.

Kirkby Lonsdale Risk in station area Grade I listed: Church of St Mary No 10 Mill Brow Devil's Bridge Grade II* listed: Church of St Bartholmew, Barbon Heritage Beckside House, Barbon Casterton Hall, East Wing, The Mews (includes the orangery), Casterton Underley Hall School Church Brow Cottage High Biggins Old Hall Tearnside Hall and attached stable and barn Environment 3 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risks BDS Fuels/Shell Gas, LPG Bulk Storage. Middleton, Kirkby Lonsdale. Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 5 Super Out Put Rurality Areas that make up Kirkby Lonsdale 2 are “Town and Fringe” and 3 are “Village and Hamlet”.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 151 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

The number of incidents attended by the fire station crew are fairly consistent each year and average around 30 per annum. There has been a reduction in dwelling fires in recent years; however RTCs continue to cause concern. The Station area is classed as ‘medium’ and ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk and it does have a number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. Many of these are in neighbouring small villages. The nearest alternative fire station is in Milnthorpe but due to the road infrastructure Sedbergh Fire Station can often respond quicker. The nearest supporting fire engines are approximately 15 minutes travel time away.

152 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Kirkby-Stephen Resources

Kirkby Stephen Fire Station has one fire engine and is crewed by 11 firefighters working the retained duty system.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Kirkby Stephen Appliance had been off the run on 34 separate occasions for a combined total of 86 hours.

Activity

Kirkby Stephen’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 5 6 3 5 3 22 FAA 4 7 1 5 8 25 FAGI 3 1 3 4 6 17 FAM 1 1 2 FDR3 2 1 2 3 3 11 OBAT 1 1 2 Dwelling Fire 4 6 1 4 4 19 Other Building Fire 2 5 1 1 2 11 Other Property Fire 2 1 4 1 2 10 Vehicle Fire 6 3 5 5 5 24 SSC Other 10 2 2 1 15 SSC RTC Related 5 7 10 9 8 39 Grand Total 44 40 34 38 41 197

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 153 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Brough LOW 602 3 15 67 0 0 0 92 16 15.28 Kirkby Stephen LOW 1261 1 7 51 0 1 1 250 48 19.83 Ravenstonedale LOW 460 1 15 30 0 0 0 31 4 6.74 New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st Average response time to Average 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA dwelling fires 2001-09 (seconds)

16UFHH E01019309 Brough & 26 L 900 641 L 9 1 8 Ravenstonedale 16UFGS Kirkby E01019317 36 M 600 332 L 3 3 Stephen 16UFGS Kirkby E01019318 26 L 900 322 L 5 5 Stephen

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Kirkby Stephen Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Kirkby Stephen:

154 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Appleby 62M1 18min 09s 10.39 Appleby 62P1 21min 11s Sedbergh 67M1 21min 00s 14.01 Sedbergh 67P1 19min 13s Shap 68P1 19.64 20min 04s

If required, additional support into Kirkby Stephen is available from North Yorkshire FRS and Durham FRS, with Hawes Fire Station (1 fire engine) 18 miles away and Barnard Castle Fire Station (2 fire engines) 22 miles away.

Other contextual information

Kirkby Stephen is a small market town on the eastern edges of Cumbria bordering Yorkshire and Durham. The Fire Station covers one of the largest areas in Cumbria, which includes the Settle and Carlisle Railway Line, and part of the M6 motorway and the main West Coast Railway. The area covered is very rural and calls within the station area are varied and include fell, farm and private dwelling house fires, floods and road traffic collisions.

Kirkby Stephen Risk in station area Brough Castle Grade I listed: Pendragon Castle, Mallerstang Church of St Andrew, Crosby Garrett Church of St Oswald, Ravenstonedale Wharton Hall, Wharton Grade II* listed: Church of St Stephen Heritage Church of St Michael, Brough Smardalegill Viaduct over Scandal Beck, Crosby Garrett The Old Rectory, Crosby Garrett Helbeck Hall with retaining wall to rear, Helbeck The Lane Cottage with attached barn and stable, Ravenstonedale Tarn House and stable adjoining west return, Ravenstonedale Smardale Hall and adjoining buildings, Waitby Manor House, Winton SAC: Helbeck and Swindale Woods (NY784164) Environment 18 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risk Warcop Army Camp Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 3 Super Out Put Rurality Areas that make up Kirkby Stephen 1 is “Town and Fringe” and 2 are “Village and Hamlet”.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 155 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

The total incidents attended by the fire station crew are fairly consistent each year and average around 40. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have one Super Output Area classed as ‘medium’ risk and also a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. The nearest alternative fire station is in Appleby but due to the rural road infrastructure the average supporting attendance times are some 20 minutes.

156 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Milnthorpe Resources

The Fire Station is staffed by 12 firefighters who work on the retained duty system and crew one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Milnthorpe Appliance had been off the run on 69 separate occasions for a combined total of 194 hours and 45 minutes.

Activity

Milnthorpe’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 2 1 4 2 9 FAA 13 11 12 23 33 92 FAGI 6 9 7 5 9 36 FAM 3 1 3 1 8 FDR3 1 10 4 7 5 27 OBAT 3 1 1 5 Dwelling Fire 6 5 3 5 7 26 Other Building Fire 2 5 3 4 4 18 Other Property Fire 3 4 4 2 13 Vehicle Fire 7 12 6 9 6 40 SSC Other 4 5 7 5 15 36 SSC RTC Related 10 12 22 10 12 66 Grand Total 51 79 70 80 96 376

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 157 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity 2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC & First Aid) & First Serious Fire Serious RTC Slight Fire (PC % First visits in

Levens LOW 834 1 8 74 1 0 1 123 15 14.75 Lyth Valley LOW 1074 6 27 119 0 1 2 99 9 9.22 Milnthorpe LOW 972 0 3 34 0 0 1 178 15 18.31

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA NUMBER WARD Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) fires 2001-09 (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA Average response time to dwelling Average

16UGJG E01019377 24 L 900 579 L 7 1 6 Levens 16UGJJ Lyth E01019381 36 M 600 977 L 3 2 1 Valley 16UGJK E01019382 24 L 900 322 L 5 5 Milnthorpe Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Milnthorpe Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Milnthorpe:

158 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Arnside 63P1 4.00 13min 03s Kendal 60P1 7.99 16min 29s Kendal 60P2 15min 45s Kirkby Lonsdale 64P1 8.99 17min 08s

If required, additional support into Milnthorpe is available from Lancashire FRS, with Silverdale Fire Station (1 fire engine) 6 miles away and Carnforth Fire Station (1 fire engines) 8 miles away

Other contextual information

Milnthorpe is a large market village situated in the south of the County, just north of the border with Lancashire. The Fire Station is located on the main A6 trunk road that runs through the village. Although a small area, the together with the M6 motorway runs through Milnthorpes' station area, and in recent years the station has attended numerous incidents on these two public transport networks. Although most of the area is rural there is a small industrial and commercial business centre on the old Nestle' Dairy site which has a number of businesses employing large numbers of people. As Milnthorpe is also on the Kent Estuary, the station has attended rescues of people who have become trapped in the notorious quicksand around the Kent Estuary, and for this reason works closely with the Coast Guard.

Milnthorpe Risk in station area Grade I listed: Dallam Tower, Beetham Church of St Michael, Beetham Church of St James, Burton in Kendal Levens Hall, Levens Orangery attached to south of Stables to north of Dallam Tower, Beetham Statue approximately 5m south of Orangery to Dallam Tower, Beetham Grade II* listed: Curtain wall approximately 30m north of Beetham Hall, Beetham Beetham Hall and attached outbuildings, Beetham Heritage Ashton House, Beetham Heron Corn Mill and attached Mill Race, Beetham Barn to East of Park House Farmhouse with attached shippons to North and East, Heversham Church of St Peter, Heversham Heversham Hall, Heversham Hincaster Hall, Hincaster Burton House, North wing; Burton House, South wing; Burton House and rear garden wall attached to South wing and forming rear wall of the White Cottage and Outlook, Burton in Kendal Preston Patrick Hall, Preston Patrick Environment 4 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Billerud Industrial Dallam Timber Treatment Services Houghtons Parkhouse Coachworks Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 3 Super Out Put Areas Rurality that make up Milnthorpe 1 is “Town and Fringe” and 2 are “Village and Hamlet”.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 159 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

The total incidents attended by the fire station crew have increased in recent years mainly due to a rise in unwanted calls to automatic fire alarms which turn out to be false alarms.The Station generally averages around 80 calls per annum and in recent years there has been an increase in dwelling fires and RTCs. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have one Super Output Area classed as ‘medium’ risk and also a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. Many of these are in neighbouring small villages.

160 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Sedbergh Resources

The fire station is staffed by 12 firefighters and has one fire engine and one Land Rover, which is useful for negotiating many of the small country lanes and farm roads in the area. The crew at Sedbergh have received specialist training and now possess the knowledge and equipment to respond with the new Land Rover to Wildfires.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Sedbergh Appliance had been off the run on 21 separate occasions for a combined total of 66 hours and 15 minutes.

Activity

Sedbergh’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 4 5 2 2 3 16 FAA 44 35 13 28 21 141 FAGI 4 2 3 9 FDR3 2 1 1 1 5 Dwelling Fire 2 1 3 4 3 13 Other Building Fire 8 3 4 2 17 Other Property Fire 3 3 6 Vehicle Fire 1 2 3 1 7 SSC Other 6 6 8 3 23 SSC RTC Related 10 11 12 16 12 61 Grand Total 77 65 43 67 46 298

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 161 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings ward Firsts Repeats First Aid) First Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in Slight Fire (PC &

Sedbergh LOW 1795 1 27 58 0 1 0 221 16 12.31

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response performance SOA Risk (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st Average response time to Average 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA dwelling fires 2001-09 (seconds)

16UGJM E01019384 28 L 900 739 L 3 1 2 Sedbergh 16UGJM E01019385 18 L 900 326 L 5 1 4 Sedbergh

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Sedbergh Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Sedbergh:

162 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Station Name Distance by Road Average attendance time Kendal 60P2 11.34 18min 42s Kirkby Lonsdale 64P1 11.32 20min 52s Kirkby Stephen 65P1 14.01 38min 33s

If required, additional support into Sedbergh is available from North Yorkshire FRS, with Hawes Fire Station (1 fire engine) 16 miles away.

Other contextual information Sedbergh is a small town with a population of about 3000, and is situated on the county's eastern border and it is a favourite destination of walkers. Apart from the large farming community the town is host to the famous which forms the heart of the town.

The town has a steady population which is mainly employed in the various shops, hotels, farms and several schools in the local area. In recent years the Station has also attended numerous swift water rescue incidents on the fast flowing river Lune that runs through the station area.

Sedbergh Risk in station area Grade I listed: Church of St Andrew, Dent The Friends' Meeting House and adjoining cottage to west, Sedbergh Church of St Andrew, Sedbergh Grade II* listed: High Oaks, Marthwaite Abbot Holme Bridge, Abbot Holme Burton Hill Farmhouse including adjoining outbuilding, Dentdale High Hall Farmhouse inlcuding cartshed, Dentdale Biggerside Farmhouse, Dentdale High House, Gawthrop Hallbeck, Hallbeck Church of All Saints, Killington The Hill, Marhwaite Lune Viaduct At Newbys Dub, that part in Sedbergh CP, Marthwaite Heritage Middleton Hall, Middleton (including Curtain walls to south-west, west and north- west; Outbuilding adjoining north-east angle of Middleton Hall and adjoining wall), Middleton Roman milestone approximately 74m to west of road, Middleton Archer's Hall, Millthrop Crook of Lune Bridge, that part in Grayrigg CP, Sedbergh Mire House, Cautley Road, Sedbergh The Old Grammar School (now the School Library), Sedbergh War Memorial Cloister at Sedbergh School, Sedbergh Thorns Hall and attached stable wing to rear, Sedbergh Crook of Lune Bridge, that part in Sedbergh CP, Sedbergh Hollin Hill Farmhouse, Soolbank Stone Hall, Soolbank Dandra Garth, Garsdale East Rackenthwaite and adjoining barn, Garsdale Badger Dub and stable attached to the south-west, Garsdale Environment 3 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risk Sedbergh School, Shell Gas and BDS Fuels Flooding No significant flood risk identified within the station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications of the 2 Super Out Put Areas Rurality that make up Sedbergh 1 is “Town and Fringe” and 1 is “Village and Hamlet”.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 163 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Conclusion

The total incidents attended by the fire station crew are generally declining. Calls to unwanted false activations of fire alarm systems continue to cause concern and these specific calls have seen a fluctuation in recent years. RTCs incidents are relatively high and the Station does respond to such calls on the main M6 motorway. The Station area is classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does have a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. Many of these are in neighbouring small villages. Due to the rural roads the distance to the nearest alternative fire stations, average attendance times from supporting fire engines are approximately 20 minutes from either Kendal or Kirkby Lonsdale.

164 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Shap Resources

The station is situated towards the north end of the village. There is one fire engine stationed there and it is currently crewed by 9 firefighters working the retained duty system.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Shap Appliance had been off the run on 64 separate occasions for a combined total of 346 hours and 30 minutes.

Activity

Shap’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 1 7 4 6 8 26 FAA 6 14 8 6 7 41 FAGI 11 6 9 4 9 39 FDR3 3 6 1 7 17 Dwelling Fire 1 1 3 6 11 Other Building Fire 2 2 5 2 7 18 Other Property Fire 1 2 3 3 1 10 Vehicle Fire 7 9 11 7 7 41 SSC Other 5 3 8 4 8 28 SSC RTC Related 19 15 15 14 7 70 Grand Total 56 65 67 59 54 301

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 165 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Aid) Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First

Crosby LOW 659 0 7 26 0 0 0 47 3 7.13 Ravensworth Orton With LOW 665 1 14 89 0 2 0 132 16 19.85 Shap LOW 664 1 28 71 0 1 1 208 23 31.33 New Risk Profile It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

Dwelling Fire response 2010 New performance (2004/5 - SOA Risk 2008/9)

SOA NUMBER WARD (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded fires 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) Average response time to dwelling Average 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st

16UFGL E01019310 Crosby 28 L 900 904 L 2 1 1 Ravensworth 16UFHA E01019325 Orton with 36 M 600 1182 L 3 3 Tebay E01019337 16UFHJ Shap 24 L 900 774 L 3 1 2

166 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Shap Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Shap:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Penrith 27P1 19min 33s 9.53 Penrith 27P2 16min 44s Appleby 62P1 11.17 15min 39s Kendal 60P1 20min 13s 16.23 Kendal 60P2 22min 23s

Other contextual information

Shap village lies on the edge of the English Lake District and has a population of 1700. It is situated on the A6 road which is about two miles from the M6 motorway and near to the West Coast Mainline Railway.

Fire crews from Shap attend an assortment of house fires, vehicle fires, chimney fires and grass fires. They also attend flooding incidents and have been involved in the rescue of trapped farm animals. The majority of calls are to the M6 motorway attending road traffic collisions.

One of the most notable incidents the Shap crew attended was that of the RAF Hawk Jet that crashed on the railway bridge at the north end of the village killing both pilots.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 167 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Shap Risk in station area Shap Abbey The Image Garden Grade I listed: Church of St Lawrence, Crosby Ravensworth Grade II* listed: Strickland Hall and stables adjoining, Little Strickland 2 summer houses on bowling green immediately to south of Maulds Meaburn Hall, Maulds Meaburn Maulds Meaburn Hall Heritage Garden walls and gate piers to front of Maulds Meaburn Hall Flass House, Maulds Meaburn Newby Hall and area wall to north, Newby Memorial to Thomas Lawson and shelter against east wall of Friends Burial Ground, Newby Church of All Saints, Orton Petty Hall, Orton Reagill Grange, Reagill Market Hall, Shap Lune Viaduct at Newbys Dub, Firbank SAC: Naddle Forest (NY 494144) Environment 7 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Shap Quarry (CORUS) Limestone Shap Quarry (HANSON) Limestone + Tarmac plant Site Specific Risk Shap Quarry (CEMEX) Granite + Tarmac plant West Coast Main line Flooding No significant Flood Risk identified within the Station area According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 3 Super Out Put Rurality Areas that make up Shap all are “Village and Hamlet”.

Conclusion

The total incidents attended by the fire station crew are generally declining. Calls to TCR incidents are declining although still a cause for concern, mainly on the M6 motorway. The station now attends approximately one incident per week. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk but it does provide cover into Tebay which is classed as ‘medium’ risk. There is a number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary, many of these are in neighbouring small villages. The nearest supporting fire engines are approximately 10 miles away in Penrith.

168 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Staveley Resources

Staveley fire station is located at The Green and is staffed by 9 fiefighters working the retained duty system. The station has one fire engine.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Staveley Appliance had been off the run of 175 separate occasions for a combined total of 430 hours.

Activity

Staveley’s fire appliance has been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 3 4 1 2 1 11 FAA 6 7 4 4 1 22 FAGI 2 1 2 1 6 FDR3 2 1 2 4 4 13 Dwelling Fire 2 5 2 2 1 12 Other Building Fire 6 2 1 7 2 18 Other Property Fire 2 1 3 Vehicle Fire 1 1 2 SSC Other 10 3 2 5 20 SSC RTC Related 3 1 3 7 Grand Total 37 23 13 26 15 114

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 169 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First Staveley-In- LOW 1074 0 11 51 0 1 0 198 10 18.44 Westmorland

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER (seconds) Total Total Failed Passed Excluded 2001-09 (seconds) 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA 1st Appliance Attendance Standard Appliance 1st Average response time to dwelling fires Average

16UGJP E01019387 Staveley-in- 30 L 900 323 L 4 4 Westmorland

170 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Staveley Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Staveley:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Kendal 60P2 4.43 10min 13s Windermere 70P1 11min 07s 4.16 Windermere 70P2 11min 37s Ambleside 61P1 8.66 N/A

Other contextual information

The village of Staveley is situated at the bottom of the Kentmere Valley between the towns of Kendal and Windermere. The village is a very close knit community with the main employer being the Kentmere Photographic operation situated along the Kentmere Valley, although over recent years operations on this site have significantly reduced.

Staveley: Risk in Station Area Grade II* listed: Church of St Anne, Ings Heritage Reston Hall, A591 Reston Kentmere Hall & attach Barn, Hodgson Brow, Kentmere Tower of Chapel of St Margaret, Main Street, Staveley Environment 1 Site of Specific Scientific Interest Site Specific Risk No significant Site Specific Risks identified within the Station area Areas around the convergence of the Rivers Kent and Gowan, Staveley Flooding main street, Silver street and Lillyfell Crook road are all areas susceptible to flooding. According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 2 Super Out Put Rurality Areas that make up Staveley 1 is “Village and Hamlet” and one is “Town and Fringe”.

Conclusion

The total incidents attended by the fire station crew are low and have reduced by over a half during the last five years. In 2008/9 the station crews were called to attend just over one incident per month. The Station area is classed as ‘low’ in terms of likely fire risk. There are a small number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary. The village has the benefit of supporting fire engines from Windermere to the North and Kendal to the South, both of which are just over four miles away.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 171 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Windermere Resources

Windermere currently has 18 firefighters on the station working the retained duty system.These firefighters crew one fire engine and one Land Rover appliance fitted out with equipment to improve our response to the predicted increase in wildland fires. The Land Rover replaced the 2nd fire appliance and was introduced in 2010 as a result of the implementation of our Integrated Risk Management Plan. Although the original intention was to improve our response to wildland fires the Land Rover has been extensively used during flood incidents and its four wheel drive capacity enables it to offer resilience in severe wintry conditions.

Retained Appliance Availability 2009

During the 2009 calendar year the Windermere Retained Fire Engines had been off the run on the following occasions:

Windermere 1 – 8 separate occasions for a combined total of 11 hours and 45 minutes

Windermere 2 – 166 separate occasions for a combined total of 386 hours and 15 minutes.

When Windermere 1 appliance was off the run so too was the Windermere 2 appliance and hence there would have been no fire cover provided during these times from Windermere Fire Station.

Activity

Windermere’s fire appliances have been called to the following number of incidents over the last five years. Some of the incidents attended have been in neighbouring station areas.

Incident Type 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 Grand Total Chimney - Dwelling 3 8 4 1 6 22 FAA 66 59 68 59 58 310 FAGI 7 1 2 9 7 26 FAM 1 2 3 1 7 FDR3 9 12 13 10 12 56 Dwelling Fire 23 12 16 16 15 82 Other Building Fire 10 17 14 15 17 73 Other Property Fire 5 2 7 4 18 Vehicle Fire 6 5 5 2 2 20 SSC Other 8 3 9 10 23 53 SSC RTC Related 9 10 19 4 7 49 Grand Total 146 130 152 136 152 716

172 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2004/5 – 2008/9 Performance Summary

The performance summary is illustrated by ward. The 2006/10 Integrated Risk Management Plan categorised Wards into either High Medium or Low Risk taking into account many variables including the prevalence of higher risk groups such as the elderly, single parents or disabled. RTC and Fire Casualties over the 5 year period, as well as the number of Home Safety Visits carried out within each ward are also documented:

Road Traffic Home Safety Visit Fires Collisions Prevention Activity

2006/10 Ward IRMP Risk Dwellings Firsts Repeats Fatal Fire Fatal RTC Slight RTC Serious Fire Serious RTC % First visits in ward Slight Fire (PC & First Aid) Slight Fire (PC & First

Windermere LOW 1169 2 24 91 0 0 0 175 51 14.97 Applethwaite Windermere LOW 1105 0 0 17 0 0 0 131 9 11.86 Bowness North Windermere LOW 1284 1 7 51 0 3 2 84 6 6.54 Bowness South Windermere LOW 1035 0 0 14 1 2 3 264 19 25.51 Town

New Risk Profile

It should be noted that the new risk profile for the Station is based on Super OutputAreas. Due to these areas often spreading over a number of historical ‘Station boundaries’ the Station that responded to the incident may vary. Detailed is the 2010 risk score based on incidents and demographic information in the particular SOA over a five year period. The average response time to dwelling fires analysed over the period 2001/02 – 2008/09 is provided to enable comparison with the new SOA standard. Five years of dwelling fire response performance from 2004/05 is provided (comparing dwelling fire response performance with the risk and response standards determined in the 2006/10 IRMP):

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 173 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

2010 New Dwelling Fire response SOA Risk performance (2004/5 - 2008/9)

SOA WARD NUMBER Total Total Failed Passed Excluded Standard (seconds) fires 2001-09 (seconds) 1st Appliance Attendance Appliance 1st 2006 IRMP Ward Risk Ward 2006 IRMP RISK SCORE (2005-10) 2010 SOA Risk Category 2010 SOA Average response time to dwelling Average

16UGJY E01019395 Windermere 36 M 600 372 L 25 4 21 Applethwaite 16UGJZ E01019396 Windermere 16 L 900 406 L 8 8 Bowness North 16UGKA Windermere E01019397 38 M 600 468 L 11 1 10 Bowness South 16UGKB E01019398 Windermere 40 M 600 380 L 6 6 Town 16UGKB E01019399 Windermere 36 M 600 344 L 7 7 Town

Next nearest Supporting Appliances

The following table indicates the travel distance in miles from Windermere Fire Station to the next nearest three fire stations and the average response times for these supporting fire engines (based on all activity between 2001/2 to 2008/9) when responding to incidents in Windermere:

Station Name Distance by Road (MILES) Average attendance time Staveley 69P1 4.16 14min 04s Ambleside 61P1 5.34 12min 29s Kendal 60P1 8.39 10min 25s

174 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Other contextual information

Windermere is a large village situated in the heart of the Lake District. As Windermere is a famous holiday destination the resident population increases significantly during summer periods who occupy the many hundreds of hotels and boarding houses within the area significantly increasing the sleeping risk. Apart from the risks from the hotel and holiday industry, Lakeland Limited, which is an international company, has a large distribution and retail centre within the village which employs hundreds of people and is a multi-million pound operation.

One of the most serious fires that the station attended in recent times involved the unique Round House on Belle Isle in the middle of Lake Windermere. Over the Christmas period of 1994 a fire caused extensive damage to the property and at the height of the blaze 80 personnel were required to deal with the incident. This proved extremely challenging as all these people and equipment had to be ferried over using boats provided by the Lake Wardens in the early hours of the morning of the fire.

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 175 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Windermere Risk in station area Brockhole Grade I listed: Moor Crag, Newby Bridge Road, Cartmel Fell Broadleys, Newby Bridge Road, Cartmel Fell Church of St Anthony (Formerly Listed As Chapel of St Anthony), Cartmel Fell Town End with attached Outbuilding, Troutbeck Parish Church Of St Martin, Lake Road, Bowness on Windermere Belle Isle (Also known as Island House and Longholme), Belle Isle, Windermere Calgarth Hall, Calgarth, Windermere Blackwell School, Bowness on Windermere Grade II* listed: Entrance Lodge, Broadleys, Newby Bridge Road, Cartmel Fell Cowmire Hall and Wall running approx 20m To East, with Gate Piers Wood Farmhouse, Troutbeck Jesus Church, Troutbeck Barn at Town End Troutbeck Heritage Monument to John Wilkinson, Lindale Barrow Wife (Formerly Listed as Meeting House), Height Road, Windermere Rayrigg Hall, Rayrigg Road, Windermere Rayrigg Hall Farmhouse, Rayrigg Road, Windermere Low Miller Ground (Ferry Cottage), Rayrigg Road, Windermere Far Orrest Old Farm Cottage, Holehird Estate, Troutbeck Helm Farm House & Cottage with Attached Barn, Helm Road, Bowness on Windermere Longmire, Troutbeck Causeway Farmhouse, Windermere Near Orrest Farmhouse, Windermere Storrs Hall, Newby Bridge Road, Bowness on Windermere Storrs Hall (Garden House), Storrs Temple, Newby Bridge Road, Bowness on Windermere Hodge Hill Farmhouse with Barn, Cartmel Fell Rectory (St Martin's), Glebe Road, Bowness on Windermere Environment 5 Sites of Specific Scientific Interest Belle Isle House Site Specific Old England Hotel Risks Belsfield Hotel Lake District Cheshire Home, Holehird Bowness Bay, The Glebe and Whitecross Bay are susceptible to flooding and during the recent floods of 2009 significant areas and businesses around the lake Flooding were under several feet of water. Other areas of both Windermere and Bowness suffer from flash flooding and surface water run off generally resulting in demand to pump out flooded basements and cellars. According to the DEFRA Urban/Rural classifications the 5 Super Out Put Areas Rurality that make up Windermere all are “Town and Fringe”. Conclusion The incident total over the previous 5 years have fluctuated around 150 per annum however the largest percentage increase in 2008/9 was to Special Service Calls (SSC other) which, in essence, are flooding calls. Property fires have remained constant for the previous 3 years and it is recognised that a large percentage of these calls are to incidents where the fire is already extinguished before our arrival. The number of Road Traffic Collisions attended has almost doubled to 7 on the previous year. The Station area is mainly classed as ‘medium’ in terms of likely fire risk and it does have a significant number of heritage and environmental risks within the station boundary.

176 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010

Appendix

The following table provides details of the annual risk score and category of each SOA since our 2006 IRMP. To arrive at the final risk score a retrospective analysis of the previous five years of incident and demographic data has been used and fed into the new risk model as detailed in our Intervention Standards Review. The table therefore provides clear details as to whether the risk in each SOA is increasing or decreasing so that we can target our prevention strategy accordingly:

CFRS Strategic Risk Review 2010 177 SOA Risk Profile - Retrospectively analysed since our 2006 IRMP Final Risk Grading Calculations

Original 1st Update 2nd Update 3rd Update 2002 to 2007 2003 to 2008 2004 to 2009 2005 to 2010 IMD SOA Dwelling Fire Banding By year Casualty Banding By year Building Fire Banding By year Banding WARD NUMBER RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE SCORE GRADE 2002- 2002- 2003- 2003- 2004- 2004- 2005- 2005- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 2002- 2003- 2004- 2005- 07 07 08 08 09 09 10 10 7 8 9 10 7 8 9 10 7 8 9 10 E01019206 16UDGF Castle 96 H 96 H 94 H 94 H 12 12 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 E01019113 16UBHG Moss Bay 74 M 82 H 90 H 92 H 12 12 12 12 8 10 12 12 6 6 6 8 12 E01019280 16UEGR Harbour 80 H 88 H 94 H 92 H 12 12 10 10 8 10 12 12 12 12 12 10 12 E01019205 16UDGF Castle 50 M 74 M 82 H 90 H 10 10 10 10 2 8 10 12 12 12 12 12 10 E01019141 16UCFQ Central 96 H 96 H 96 H 88 H 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 10 12 12 12 12 12 E01019156 16UCFU Hindpool 96 H 96 H 96 H 88 H 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 10 12 12 12 12 12 E01019197 16UDGC Botcherby 90 H 90 H 90 H 88 H 12 12 12 10 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 6 12 E01019112 16UBHG Moss Bay 56 M 88 H 84 H 86 H 10 10 10 10 4 12 12 12 6 6 2 4 12 E01019231 16UDGR Morton 78 H 86 H 86 H 86 H 12 12 12 12 10 12 12 12 2 2 2 2 12 E01019234 16UDGS St Aidans 62 M 62 M 86 H 86 H 12 12 12 12 6 6 12 12 2 2 2 2 12 E01019157 16UCFU Hindpool 64 M 70 M 76 H 82 H 12 12 12 12 4 6 8 10 12 10 8 6 12 E01019209 16UDGG Currock 74 M 82 H 82 H 82 H 12 12 12 12 10 12 12 12 2 2 2 2 10 E01019193 16UDGB Belle Vue 62 M 62 M 62 M 78 H 12 12 12 12 6 6 6 10 2 2 2 2 12 E01019245 16UDGW Upperby 70 M 70 M 78 H 78 H 12 12 12 12 8 8 10 10 2 2 2 2 12 E01019175 16UCFZ Risedale 74 M 84 H 84 H 76 H 8 10 10 10 10 12 12 10 2 2 2 2 12 E01019204 16UDGF Castle 76 H 74 M 74 M 74 M 12 10 10 10 8 8 8 8 12 12 12 12 10 E01019220 16UDGL Harraby 80 H 76 H 78 H 74 M 8 6 6 2 12 12 12 12 8 6 8 8 8 E01019111 16UBHG Moss Bay 64 M 72 M 80 H 72 M 10 10 10 10 6 8 10 8 6 6 6 6 12 E01019171 16UCFY Parkside 56 M 64 M 72 M 72 M 10 10 10 10 6 8 10 10 2 2 2 2 10 E01019095 16UBGY Ellenborough 84 H 78 H 78 H 70 M 10 12 12 12 12 10 10 8 2 2 2 2 12 E01019161 16UCFW Newbarns 80 H 76 H 76 H 70 M 6 4 4 4 10 10 10 10 10 8 8 2 12 E01019168 16UCFY Parkside 56 M 56 M 64 M 70 M 10 10 10 10 6 6 8 10 6 6 6 4 8 E01019199 16UDGC Botcherby 78 H 86 H 86 H 70 M 12 12 12 12 10 12 12 8 2 2 2 2 12 E01019099 16UBHA Flimby 84 H 74 M 68 M 68 M 8 8 6 6 12 10 10 10 8 6 2 2 10 E01019122 16UBHK St Michael's 88 H 84 H 68 M 68 M 12 8 8 8 10 10 6 6 12 12 12 12 12 E01019139 16UCFP Barrow Island 68 M 52 M 76 H 68 M 8 8 8 8 6 2 8 6 12 12 12 12 12 E01019140 16UCFQ Central 44 M 68 M 60 M 68 M 10 10 10 10 2 8 6 8 2 2 2 2 12 E01019187 16UCGC Walney South 34 L 56 M 66 M 68 M 4 2 4 6 2 8 10 10 2 2 2 2 10 E01019248 16UDGW Upperby 60 M 60 M 68 M 68 M 10 10 10 10 6 6 8 8 2 2 2 2 12 E01019301 16UEHD Sandwith 62 M 70 M 70 M 68 M 12 12 12 10 6 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 12 E01019360 16UGHQ Kendal Fell 58 M 68 M 68 M 68 M 6 8 8 8 8 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 4 E01019236 16UDGS St Aidans 66 M 68 M 68 M 66 M 8 10 10 8 8 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 12 E01019295 16UEGZ Mirehouse 66 M 76 H 68 M 66 M 8 10 10 8 8 10 8 8 2 2 2 2 12 E01019222 16UDGL Harraby 60 M 74 M 72 M 64 M 12 12 12 12 4 8 8 6 8 6 4 4 12 E01019272 16UEGL Egremont North 70 M 80 H 72 M 64 M 4 6 6 6 10 12 10 8 2 2 2 2 12 E01019315 16UFGR Hesket 64 M 74 M 72 M 64 M 4 4 2 2 10 12 12 10 8 10 10 10 6 E01019283 16UEGS Haverigg 54 M 70 M 62 M 62 M 2 2 2 2 6 10 8 8 12 12 12 12 8 E01019110 16UBHF Moorclose 58 M 58 M 68 M 60 M 8 8 10 10 6 6 8 6 2 2 2 2 12 E01019136 16UBHU Wigton 62 M 62 M 60 M 60 M 2 2 2 2 10 10 10 10 8 8 6 6 6 E01019158 16UCFU Hindpool 62 M 70 M 62 M 60 M 10 10 10 10 6 8 6 6 4 4 4 2 12 E01019170 16UCFY Parkside 44 M 26 L 28 L 60 M 6 4 6 6 6 2 2 10 2 2 2 2 6 E01019178 16UCGA Roosecote 56 M 56 M 58 M 60 M 2 2 2 4 8 8 8 8 6 6 8 8 8 E01019211 16UDGG Currock 72 M 62 M 60 M 60 M 8 6 6 6 8 6 6 6 12 12 10 10 10 E01019230 16UDGR Morton 44 M 44 M 60 M 60 M 10 10 10 10 2 2 6 6 2 2 2 2 12 E01019263 16UEGH Cleator Moor North 44 M 68 M 68 M 60 M 10 10 10 10 2 8 8 6 2 2 2 2 12 E01019268 16UEGK Distington 72 M 70 M 70 M 60 M 2 2 4 2 12 12 12 10 6 4 2 2 8 E01019151 16UCFS Dalton South 40 M 58 M 58 M 58 M 2 4 4 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 10 E01019177 16UCGA Roosecote 70 M 50 M 58 M 58 M 10 8 8 8 8 4 6 6 4 2 2 2 12 E01019282 16UEGR Harbour 52 M 48 M 34 L 58 M 10 6 8 8 6 6 2 8 2 2 2 2 8 E01019375 16UGJE Lakes Ambleside 54 M 52 M 56 M 58 M 2 2 4 4 10 10 10 10 8 6 8 10 2 E01019097 16UBGZ Ewanrigg 58 M 66 M 58 M 56 M 8 8 8 6 6 8 6 6 2 2 2 2 12 E01019109 16UBHF Moorclose 38 M 56 M 56 M 56 M 8 10 10 10 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 10 E01019114 16UBHH Netherhall 48 M 44 M 44 M 56 M 6 2 2 6 6 6 6 8 2 2 2 2 8 E01019121 16UBHK St Michael's 56 M 62 M 56 M 56 M 8 8 6 6 4 6 6 6 8 6 2 2 12 E01019164 16UCFX Ormsgill 56 M 56 M 56 M 56 M 12 12 12 12 2 2 2 2 12 12 12 12 12 E01019165 16UCFX Ormsgill 52 M 58 M 56 M 56 M 10 8 6 6 4 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 12 E01019166 16UCFX Ormsgill 58 M 66 M 66 M 56 M 8 8 8 6 6 8 8 6 2 2 2 2 12 E01019210 16UDGG Currock 66 M 68 M 68 M 56 M 12 12 12 10 8 8 8 6 2 4 4 2 10 E01019213 16UDGH Dalston 60 M 58 M 58 M 56 M 4 4 4 2 8 8 8 8 12 10 10 10 6 16UDGK Great Corby and E01019219 Geltsdale 24 L 50 M 60 M 56 M 2 2 4 4 2 8 10 10 6 8 8 4 4 E01019277 16UEGP Frizington 82 H 66 M 66 M 56 M 8 8 8 6 12 8 8 6 2 2 2 2 12 E01019340 16UFHM Warcop 24 L 56 M 56 M 56 M 2 2 2 2 2 10 10 10 2 2 2 2 6 E01019106 16UBHD Keswick 28 L 28 L 28 L 54 M 6 6 6 8 4 4 4 10 2 2 2 2 2 E01019186 16UCGC Walney South 38 M 38 M 54 M 54 M 8 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 2 2 2 2 10 E01019269 16UEGK Distington 64 M 64 M 56 M 54 M 6 6 6 4 8 8 6 6 2 2 2 2 12 E01019137 16UBHU Wigton 60 M 58 M 52 M 52 M 6 4 4 2 8 8 6 6 2 2 4 6 10 E01019142 16UCFQ Central 50 M 50 M 52 M 52 M 8 8 10 10 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 12 E01019173 16UCFZ Risedale 64 M 60 M 58 M 52 M 10 6 6 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 2 12 E01019184 16UCGC Walney South 54 M 52 M 60 M 52 M 8 6 6 6 6 6 8 6 2 2 2 2 10 E01019327 16UFHC Penrith East 78 H 78 H 52 M 52 M 12 12 10 10 12 12 6 6 2 2 2 2 8 E01019364 16UGHU Kendal Kirkland 32 L 52 M 52 M 52 M 6 10 10 10 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 8 16UGJH Low Furness & E01019380 Swarthmoor 30 L 28 L 52 M 52 M 8 6 6 6 2 2 8 8 2 2 2 2 6 E01019388 16UGJQ Ulverston Central 38 M 50 M 52 M 52 M 4 6 6 6 4 6 6 6 2 4 6 6 8 E01019089 16UBGS Clifton 62 M 62 M 60 M 50 M 8 8 6 4 8 8 8 6 2 2 2 2 10 E01019143 16UCFQ Central 70 M 70 M 52 M 50 M 12 12 10 10 6 6 2 2 10 10 10 8 12 E01019160 16UCFW Newbarns 60 M 68 M 68 M 50 M 10 10 10 8 6 8 8 4 2 2 2 2 12 E01019207 16UDGF Castle 58 M 58 M 56 M 50 M 10 10 8 10 4 4 4 2 8 8 8 8 12 E01019216 16UDGJ Denton Holme 40 M 40 M 48 M 50 M 10 10 10 10 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 4 10 16UDGP Longtown & E01019226 Rockcliffe 70 M 56 M 66 M 50 M 8 2 4 4 12 10 12 8 2 2 2 2 6 E01019305 16UFGF Alston Moor 54 M 54 M 52 M 50 M 4 4 4 2 6 6 6 6 10 10 8 8 8 E01019081 16UBGN Aspatria 40 M 50 M 50 M 48 M 4 6 6 4 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 8 10 E01019108 16UBHF Moorclose 44 M 44 M 44 M 48 M 10 10 10 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 12 E01019115 16UBHH Netherhall 84 H 74 M 58 M 48 M 10 8 8 6 10 8 4 2 10 10 10 10 12 E01019116 16UBHJ St John's 64 M 64 M 50 M 48 M 10 10 8 6 6 6 2 2 6 6 10 10 12 E01019172 16UCFZ Risedale 38 M 54 M 48 M 48 M 4 2 6 6 2 6 4 4 2 4 2 2 12 E01019218 16UDGJ Denton Holme 50 M 50 M 40 M 48 M 8 6 6 6 4 4 2 4 6 8 6 6 10 E01019221 16UDGL Harraby 58 M 50 M 48 M 48 M 8 8 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 12 E01019265 16UEGH Cleator Moor North 48 M 44 M 48 M 48 M 10 10 10 8 2 2 2 2 6 2 6 8 12 E01019273 16UEGL Egremont North 52 M 52 M 50 M 48 M 6 6 4 2 8 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 6 E01019308 16UFGJ Askham 70 M 50 M 50 M 48 M 8 4 4 2 12 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 6 E01019356 16UGHL Hawkshead 32 L 42 M 48 M 48 M 4 6 4 6 4 6 8 8 4 4 4 2 4 E01019083 16UBGP Boltons 42 M 44 M 44 M 46 M 4 6 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 8 4 E01019159 16UCFU Hindpool 44 M 44 M 44 M 46 M 8 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 6 12 E01019217 16UDGJ Denton Holme 46 M 46 M 38 M 46 M 4 4 4 4 6 6 4 6 2 2 2 2 8 E01019278 16UEGP Frizington 48 M 50 M 48 M 46 M 6 6 4 2 6 6 6 6 2 4 4 4 8 E01019348 16UGHE Burton & Holme 16 L 16 L 20 L 46 M 2 2 6 8 2 2 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 E01019088 16UBGR Christchurch 32 L 32 L 34 L 44 M 2 2 4 6 2 2 2 4 10 10 10 10 6 E01019189 16UDGA Belah 54 M 48 M 46 M 44 M 8 10 8 6 8 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 6 E01019194 16UDGB Belle Vue 62 M 54 M 44 M 44 M 12 12 10 10 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019246 16UDGW Upperby 44 M 44 M 44 M 44 M 10 10 10 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019296 16UEGZ Mirehouse 52 M 50 M 48 M 44 M 10 8 8 6 4 4 4 4 6 6 4 2 10 E01019299 16UEHB Newtown 46 M 46 M 42 M 44 M 8 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 6 8 4 6 12 E01019392 16UGJU Ulverston Town 34 L 44 M 44 M 44 M 6 6 6 6 2 6 6 6 8 2 2 2 6 E01019098 16UBGZ Ewanrigg 40 M 40 M 42 M 42 M 6 6 8 8 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 6 10 E01019174 16UCFZ Risedale 44 M 44 M 42 M 42 M 10 10 8 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019190 16UDGA Belah 24 L 42 M 42 M 42 M 4 6 6 6 2 6 6 6 8 8 8 8 2 E01019198 16UDGC Botcherby 58 M 58 M 42 M 42 M 8 8 8 8 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019276 16UEGN Ennerdale 52 M 44 M 44 M 42 M 6 6 6 4 8 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 6 E01019285 16UEGT Hensingham 48 M 50 M 42 M 42 M 6 8 8 8 4 4 2 2 6 6 6 6 10 E01019294 16UEGZ Mirehouse 40 M 40 M 42 M 42 M 6 6 8 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019302 16UEHD Sandwith 32 L 32 L 32 L 42 M 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 10 E01019334 16UFHF Penrith South 24 L 42 M 42 M 42 M 2 4 4 4 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 E01019365 16UGHW Kendal Mintsfeet 28 L 26 L 42 M 42 M 6 6 6 6 2 2 6 6 10 8 8 8 2 E01019376 16UGJF Lakes Grasmere 36 M 36 M 36 M 42 M 4 2 2 2 6 6 6 8 4 6 6 4 2 E01019102 16UBHC Holme 40 M 48 M 48 M 40 M 6 6 6 6 4 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 8 E01019123 16UBHL Seaton 58 M 58 M 50 M 40 M 8 8 8 6 8 8 6 4 2 2 2 2 8 E01019149 16UCFS Dalton South 40 M 40 M 30 L 40 M 6 6 4 6 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 2 8 E01019152 16UCFT Hawcoat 44 M 40 M 42 M 40 M 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 6 6 2 4 2 6 E01019183 16UCGB Walney North 44 M 42 M 42 M 40 M 10 8 8 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019202 16UDGD Brampton 58 M 40 M 40 M 40 M 4 2 2 2 8 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 10 E01019215 16UDGJ Denton Holme 62 M 60 M 40 M 40 M 10 8 6 6 6 6 2 2 8 8 6 6 10 E01019247 16UDGW Upperby 44 M 46 M 36 M 40 M 6 6 6 8 4 4 2 2 2 4 2 4 10 E01019267 16UEGJ Cleator Moor South 42 M 38 M 38 M 40 M 8 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 6 12 E01019333 16UFHF Penrith South 56 M 54 M 36 M 40 M 10 10 10 10 6 6 2 2 6 4 2 6 8 E01019335 16UFHG Penrith West 74 M 72 M 56 M 40 M 10 10 10 10 10 10 6 2 12 10 10 10 6 E01019398 16UGKB Windermere Town 40 M 56 M 48 M 40 M 6 6 6 6 6 10 8 6 2 2 2 2 4 E01019126 16UBHM Silloth 72 M 38 M 40 M 38 M 8 8 10 8 10 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 10 E01019154 16UCFT Hawcoat 36 M 36 M 38 M 38 M 2 2 4 4 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 4 16UDGP Longtown & E01019227 Rockcliffe 40 M 40 M 40 M 38 M 10 10 10 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019274 16UEGM Egremont South 44 M 40 M 40 M 38 M 6 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 2 8 E01019284 16UEGT Hensingham 40 M 40 M 40 M 38 M 10 10 10 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019319 16UFGT Kirkby Thore 38 M 38 M 36 M 38 M 6 6 4 6 2 2 2 2 12 12 12 12 6 E01019389 16UGJR Ulverston East 42 M 38 M 40 M 38 M 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 8 6 8 6 10 16UGKA Windermere E01019397 Bowness South 50 M 58 M 56 M 38 M 6 6 6 4 6 8 8 4 12 12 10 10 4 E01019138 16UCFP Barrow Island 42 M 36 M 36 M 36 M 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019167 16UCFX Ormsgill 40 M 38 M 36 M 36 M 6 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 8 E01019180 16UCGB Walney North 36 M 36 M 28 L 36 M 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 2 8 E01019181 16UCGB Walney North 36 M 52 M 36 M 36 M 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019266 16UEGJ Cleator Moor South 36 M 36 M 34 L 36 M 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 6 4 6 10 E01019270 16UEGK Distington 52 M 54 M 54 M 36 M 6 8 8 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019271 16UEGL Egremont North 56 M 56 M 38 M 36 M 6 6 4 2 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 E01019291 16UEGX Kells 54 M 56 M 38 M 36 M 8 10 8 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019317 16UFGS Kirkby Stephen 44 M 42 M 36 M 36 M 6 6 2 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 2 2 4 E01019325 16UFHA Orton with Tebay 40 M 38 M 38 M 36 M 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 6 4 4 2 8 E01019339 16UFHL Ullswater 32 L 50 M 38 M 36 M 6 6 4 2 4 8 6 6 2 4 2 2 4 E01019370 16UGJB Kendal Strickland 24 L 22 L 22 L 36 M 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 4 2 4 E01019372 16UGJD Kirkby Lonsdale 22 L 24 L 22 L 36 M 8 10 8 6 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 E01019381 16UGJJ Lyth Valley 20 L 36 M 36 M 36 M 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 4 E01019386 16UGJN Staveley-in-Cartmel 58 M 48 M 46 M 36 M 2 2 2 2 10 8 8 6 8 6 4 2 4 E01019394 16UGJX Whinfell 38 M 40 M 40 M 36 M 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 6 4 6 6 2 4 16UGJY Windermere E01019395 Applethwaite 38 M 38 M 38 M 36 M 10 10 10 8 2 2 2 2 12 12 12 12 4 E01019399 16UGKB Windermere Town 44 M 38 M 38 M 36 M 6 8 8 6 8 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 E01019135 16UBHU Wigton 36 M 36 M 36 M 34 L 6 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019150 16UCFS Dalton South 32 L 32 L 32 L 34 L 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019155 16UCFT Hawcoat 36 M 36 M 38 M 34 L 4 4 6 2 2 2 2 2 12 12 12 12 6 E01019208 16UDGG Currock 34 L 34 L 34 L 34 L 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019249 16UDGX Wetheral 26 L 36 M 36 M 34 L 4 6 6 4 4 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 E01019321 16UFGW Langwathby 36 M 36 M 36 M 34 L 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 6 E01019332 16UFHE Penrith Pategill 56 M 54 M 52 M 34 L 12 12 10 8 6 6 6 2 4 2 2 2 8 E01019147 16UCFR Dalton North 44 M 32 L 32 L 32 L 6 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019196 16UDGC Botcherby 48 M 40 M 34 L 32 L 8 8 4 4 4 2 2 2 8 8 6 4 8 E01019233 16UDGR Morton 32 L 32 L 32 L 32 L 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019240 16UDGT Stanwix Rural 32 L 32 L 32 L 32 L 4 4 6 6 2 2 2 2 8 8 6 6 6 E01019252 16UDGY Yewdale 32 L 32 L 32 L 32 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019257 16UEGE Beckermet 32 L 32 L 32 L 32 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019259 16UEGF Bootle 32 L 32 L 30 L 32 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 4 6 8 E01019289 16UEGW Holborn Hill 32 L 32 L 32 L 32 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 10 E01019311 16UFGM Dacre 62 M 56 M 34 L 32 L 2 2 2 2 12 12 6 6 8 2 4 2 2 E01019354 16UGHK Grange 18 L 36 M 34 L 32 L 4 6 4 2 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 E01019371 16UGJC Kendal Underley 50 M 50 M 48 M 32 L 8 8 6 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019080 16UBGM All Saints 28 L 28 L 28 L 30 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 8 E01019104 16UBHD Keswick 46 M 36 M 28 L 30 L 8 8 6 6 6 4 2 2 6 4 6 8 4 E01019105 16UBHD Keswick 26 L 26 L 30 L 30 L 4 4 6 6 2 2 2 2 10 10 12 12 2 E01019107 16UBHE Marsh 28 L 28 L 30 L 30 L 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019118 16UBHJ St John's 32 L 32 L 30 L 30 L 6 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019188 16UDGA Belah 30 L 28 L 30 L 30 L 8 6 8 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019260 16UEGG Bransty 32 L 32 L 28 L 30 L 6 6 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019346 16UGHD Burneside 32 L 32 L 28 L 30 L 6 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 6 6 4 6 6 16UGJP Staveley-in- E01019387 Westmorland 24 L 22 L 22 L 30 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 10 8 8 8 2 E01019090 16UBGT Crummock 44 M 44 M 28 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 8 8 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 E01019091 16UBGU Dalton 20 L 20 L 20 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 4 E01019120 16UBHK St Michael's 42 M 42 M 32 L 28 L 6 6 6 2 4 4 2 2 8 8 6 6 6 E01019125 16UBHL Seaton 22 L 28 L 26 L 28 L 2 2 2 4 2 4 4 4 8 6 4 4 2 E01019129 16UBHP Stainburn 20 L 20 L 28 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 E01019132 16UBHS Waver 44 M 44 M 28 L 28 L 4 4 2 2 6 6 2 2 4 4 6 6 6 E01019182 16UCGB Walney North 28 L 30 L 28 L 28 L 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019200 16UDGD Brampton 50 M 50 M 46 M 28 L 6 6 4 2 8 8 8 4 4 4 2 2 4 16UDGP Longtown & E01019228 Rockcliffe 32 L 30 L 30 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 4 4 2 8 E01019229 16UDGQ Lyne 28 L 24 L 26 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 4 6 6 E01019232 16UDGR Morton 32 L 32 L 30 L 28 L 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019235 16UDGS St Aidans 30 L 28 L 28 L 28 L 8 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019237 16UDGS St Aidans 48 M 50 M 30 L 28 L 6 8 6 6 6 6 2 2 6 6 4 2 6 E01019239 16UDGT Stanwix Rural 60 M 60 M 60 M 28 L 2 2 2 2 12 12 12 4 2 2 2 2 4 E01019286 16UEGT Hensingham 34 L 32 L 30 L 28 L 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 4 4 2 8 E01019290 16UEGW Holborn Hill 32 L 32 L 30 L 28 L 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019293 16UEGY Millom Without 48 M 48 M 30 L 28 L 6 6 4 2 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 E01019298 16UEHB Newtown 28 L 28 L 28 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 16UFGL Crosby E01019310 Ravensworth 24 L 24 L 24 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 E01019320 16UFGU Kirkoswald 20 L 22 L 30 L 28 L 2 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 E01019363 16UGHT Kendal Highgate 52 M 40 M 30 L 28 L 8 6 4 4 6 4 2 2 8 6 6 4 6 E01019384 16UGJM Sedbergh 26 L 26 L 28 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 8 8 2 2 4 E01019391 16UGJT Ulverston South 20 L 28 L 28 L 28 L 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 4 E01019094 16UBGX Ellen 24 L 24 L 24 L 26 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 6 E01019100 16UBHB Harrington 26 L 26 L 26 L 26 L 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019127 16UBHM Silloth 30 L 28 L 30 L 26 L 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 8 4 6 E01019128 16UBHN Solway 30 L 28 L 28 L 26 L 8 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019169 16UCFY Parkside 24 L 24 L 24 L 26 L 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019185 16UCGC Walney South 24 L 24 L 28 L 26 L 2 2 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019201 16UDGD Brampton 30 L 28 L 28 L 26 L 8 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019225 16UDGN Irthing 26 L 26 L 26 L 26 L 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019253 16UDGY Yewdale 20 L 22 L 26 L 26 L 2 4 8 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019281 16UEGR Harbour 46 M 28 L 30 L 26 L 8 4 6 2 6 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 6 E01019300 16UEHC St Bees 16 L 18 L 28 L 26 L 2 2 6 4 2 2 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 E01019304 16UEHE Seascale 24 L 42 M 26 L 26 L 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 4 4 4 6 16UFHH Brough & E01019309 Ravenstonedale 28 L 28 L 28 L 26 L 6 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019318 16UFGS Kirkby Stephen 60 M 60 M 26 L 26 L 6 6 4 4 10 10 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019336 16UFHG Penrith West 32 L 30 L 28 L 26 L 8 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 8 8 6 4 4 E01019350 16UGHG Coniston 40 M 44 M 34 L 26 L 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 2 2 6 4 4 4 E01019374 16UGJE Lakes Ambleside 22 L 22 L 24 L 26 L 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 8 8 10 10 2 E01019082 16UBGN Aspatria 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 16UBGQ Broughton St E01019084 Bridget's 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019093 16UBGX Ellen 36 M 36 M 24 L 24 L 6 6 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019096 16UBGY Ellenborough 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019134 16UBHU Wigton 42 M 44 M 40 M 24 L 4 6 2 2 8 8 8 4 2 2 2 2 2 E01019144 16UCFR Dalton North 24 L 26 L 26 L 24 L 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019145 16UCFR Dalton North 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019146 16UCFR Dalton North 26 L 28 L 24 L 24 L 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 6 E01019242 16UDGU Stanwix Urban 28 L 26 L 30 L 24 L 8 8 10 6 2 2 2 2 4 2 4 2 4 E01019254 16UDGY Yewdale 20 L 18 L 24 L 24 L 6 4 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 E01019255 16UDGY Yewdale 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 E01019256 16UEGD Arlecdon 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019264 16UEGH Cleator Moor North 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019275 16UEGM Egremont South 32 L 32 L 32 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019292 16UEGX Kells 40 M 40 M 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019297 16UEHA Moresby 26 L 26 L 24 L 24 L 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019314 16UFGQ Hartside 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019337 16UFHJ Shap 16 L 16 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 E01019338 16UFHK Skelton 28 L 28 L 24 L 24 L 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019343 16UGHB Arnside & Beetham 24 L 16 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 4 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 E01019344 16UGHC Broughton 28 L 28 L 26 L 24 L 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019352 16UGHJ Crooklands 16 L 16 L 24 L 24 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 E01019359 16UGHP Kendal Far Cross 26 L 26 L 24 L 24 L 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 E01019367 16UGHY Kendal Oxenholme 30 L 30 L 26 L 24 L 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 12 12 10 10 2 E01019373 16UGJD Kirkby Lonsdale 24 L 24 L 24 L 24 L 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 6 2 E01019377 16UGJG Levens 28 L 20 L 28 L 24 L 6 6 6 2 4 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 E01019382 16UGJK Milnthorpe 26 L 20 L 24 L 24 L 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 6 6 4 E01019101 16UBHB Harrington 24 L 24 L 22 L 22 L 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 10 8 8 2 E01019130 16UBHQ Wampool 20 L 20 L 20 L 22 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 E01019133 16UBHT Wharrels 32 L 32 L 24 L 22 L 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 6 6 6 4 4 E01019148 16UCFS Dalton South 30 L 30 L 30 L 22 L 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019212 16UDGH Dalston 42 M 40 M 38 M 22 L 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 2 8 6 4 4 4 E01019214 16UDGH Dalston 36 M 26 L 24 L 22 L 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 10 8 6 4 4 E01019324 16UFGZ Morland 22 L 24 L 22 L 22 L 4 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019349 16UGHF Cartmel 22 L 22 L 22 L 22 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 8 8 8 8 2 E01019358 16UGHN Kendal Castle 32 L 30 L 28 L 22 L 6 4 2 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 16UGJH Low Furness & E01019378 Swarthmoor 20 L 20 L 20 L 22 L 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019079 16UBGM All Saints 16 L 16 L 16 L 20 L 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019117 16UBHJ St John's 20 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019131 16UBHR Warnell 36 M 28 L 28 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019153 16UCFT Hawcoat 16 L 18 L 20 L 20 L 2 4 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019176 16UCGA Roosecote 20 L 20 L 28 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019179 16UCGA Roosecote 20 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019203 16UDGE Burgh 22 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019223 16UDGL Harraby 22 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019224 16UDGM Hayton 20 L 22 L 20 L 20 L 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019250 16UDGX Wetheral 20 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019303 16UEHE Seascale 16 L 20 L 22 L 20 L 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 E01019306 16UFGG Appleby (Appleby) 42 M 22 L 22 L 20 L 4 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 6 4 4 2 4 E01019312 16UFGN Eamont 24 L 24 L 24 L 20 L 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019313 16UFGP Greystoke 30 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 4 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019316 16UFGR Hesket 36 M 36 M 36 M 20 L 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019322 16UFGX Lazonby 22 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 8 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019323 16UFGY Long Marton 20 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019329 16UFHD Penrith North 20 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019331 16UFHD Penrith North 22 L 24 L 22 L 20 L 4 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019351 16UGHH Crake Valley 36 M 28 L 28 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019357 16UGHM Holker 20 L 20 L 20 L 20 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019362 16UGHS Kendal Heron Hill 18 L 16 L 20 L 20 L 4 2 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019366 16UGHX Kendal Nether 16 L 16 L 18 L 20 L 2 2 4 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16UGJH Low Furness & E01019379 Swarthmoor 24 L 26 L 24 L 20 L 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 E01019390 16UGJS Ulverston North 30 L 30 L 20 L 20 L 4 4 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 E01019092 16UBGW Derwent Valley 18 L 26 L 16 L 18 L 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 4 4 2 4 2 E01019195 16UDGB Belle Vue 16 L 16 L 18 L 18 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 E01019262 16UEGG Bransty 16 L 16 L 18 L 18 L 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019279 16UEGQ Gosforth 18 L 16 L 16 L 18 L 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 E01019342 16UGHB Arnside & Beetham 16 L 16 L 16 L 18 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 E01019355 16UGHK Grange 16 L 16 L 18 L 18 L 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019383 16UGJL Natland 16 L 16 L 16 L 18 L 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019385 16UGJM Sedbergh 26 L 22 L 18 L 18 L 12 8 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019078 16UBGM All Saints 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16UBGQ Broughton St E01019085 Bridget's 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16UBGQ Broughton St E01019086 Bridget's 32 L 32 L 32 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019087 16UBGR Christchurch 20 L 18 L 18 L 16 L 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019103 16UBHD Keswick 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019119 16UBHJ St John's 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019124 16UBHL Seaton 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019162 16UCFW Newbarns 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019163 16UCFW Newbarns 20 L 22 L 18 L 16 L 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 2 2 2 E01019191 16UDGA Belah 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019192 16UDGB Belle Vue 18 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019238 16UDGT Stanwix Rural 34 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 4 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019241 16UDGU Stanwix Urban 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019243 16UDGU Stanwix Urban 20 L 18 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 4 2 2 2 E01019244 16UDGU Stanwix Urban 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019251 16UDGX Wetheral 26 L 26 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 E01019258 16UEGE Beckermet 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019261 16UEGG Bransty 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019287 16UEGU Hillcrest 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019288 16UEGU Hillcrest 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019307 16UFGH Appleby (Bongate) 18 L 16 L 18 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 4 2 2 E01019326 16UFHB Penrith Carleton 24 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019328 16UFHC Penrith East 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019330 16UFHD Penrith North 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019341 16UGHB Arnside & Beetham 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019345 16UGHC Broughton 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019347 16UGHE Burton & Holme 24 L 24 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019353 16UGHK Grange 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019361 16UGHR Kendal Glebelands 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019368 16UGHZ Kendal Parks 16 L 16 L 16 L 16 L 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019369 16UGJA Kendal Stonecross 20 L 20 L 18 L 16 L 6 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 E01019393 16UGJW Ulverston West 18 L 18 L 16 L 16 L 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 16UGJZ Windermere E01019396 Bowness North 20 L 18 L 18 L 16 L 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2