Finding the Tail End: the Discovery of RNA Splicing PROFILE Melissa Suran, Science Writer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PROFILE Finding the tail end: The discovery of RNA splicing PROFILE Melissa Suran, Science Writer Major findings are sometimes hidden in small details. Molecular biologists at the time worked almost At least that was the case when, in a PNAS article, exclusively with bacterial systems, which are easy to molecular biologist Phillip Sharp and his research grow in a laboratory. Although Sharp primarily studied team described a little strand of RNA that led to an bacteria and published work about the Escherichia coli understanding of how proteins are synthesized in genome during his postdoctoral position at the cells (1). California Institute of Technology with biochemist During the 1970s, Sharp headed a laboratory in the Norman Davidson (2, 3), he started exploring tumor Center for Cancer Research at the Massachusetts biology and virology. When Sharp arrived at CSHL, he turned his attention toward DNA viruses known to in- Institute of Technology (MIT). Having been a post- fect animal cells. He was particularly curious about doctoral researcher for geneticist James Watson and gene expression—the conversion of DNA into instruc- then a staff member at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory tions for creating proteins—in human cells and began (CSHL) prior to his appointment at MIT, Sharp was studying the transcriptional profile of a simian DNA drawn to studying genes and measuring chromosome virus called SV40. Found in both humans and mon- sizes. The field of genetics was relatively primitive; keys, SV40 can generate tumors. Sharp’s work with Watson and Francis Crick had discovered DNA’s struc- the virus stemmed from a collaboration with virolo- ture only 2 decades earlier. gist Joseph Sambrook. Meanwhile, an officemate, Ulf Fig. 1. Members of the MIT Center for Cancer Research (Robert Weinberg, Second Row from Bottom, Far Left; Susan Berget, Third Row from Bottom, Third from Left; Claire Moore, Back Row, Fourth from Left; Philip Sharp, Back Row, Far Right). Image courtesy of Robert Weinberg. Published under the PNAS license. See Classic Article “Spliced segments at the 5′ terminus of adenovirus 2 late mRNA” on page 3171 in issue 8 of volume 74. First published December 23, 2019. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1919416116 PNAS | January 28, 2020 | vol. 117 | no. 4 | 1829–1832 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 Fig. 2. (A–C) Electron micrograph of a hexon mRNA hybridized to an adenovirus genome fragment. The arrows in the micrographs mark the single-stranded RNA tails at the ends of the RNA/DNA hybrid. The 5’ to 3’ orientation of the mRNA is indicated in C, and the displaced single-stranded viral DNA is shown as a thin line. Reproduced with permission from ref. 1. Pettersson, worked on DNA replication of adenovirus, a member of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical a common virus with a double-stranded DNA genome Research and professor of biology at MIT. that is known to cause tumors in rodents and a range In fact, Weinberg adds, not all groups at the center of illnesses in humans. focused directly on cancer as a disease. “The MIT “Ulf and I became friends,” Sharp says. “He was cancer center was built on the notion that curiosity- interested in adenovirus DNA replication; I was interested driven research is likely to yield great benefits.” in adenovirus transcriptional activities and the location And it did. During the 1970s and 1980s, MIT’s of genes.” Center for Cancer Research was a research powerhouse A few years earlier, microbiologists Daniel Nathans with notable scientists, including David Baltimore and and Hamilton Smith discovered enzymes called re- Susumu Tonegawa, who won Nobel Prizes for discov- striction endonucleases (4–6), which earned them a ering reverse transcriptase and the rearrangement of shared Nobel Prize with Werner Arber. Following their antibody genes, respectively. insights, Sharp developed a method to purify restriction Around 1975, Weinberg organized a weekly meeting for the center’s fifth floor laboratories to discuss their re- enzymes using gel electrophoresis and ethidium bro- search. Little did Sharp know that those meetings would mide staining. Eventually, Sharp, Pettersson, and others ultimately play an integral role in a landmark discovery. made restriction maps of the adenovirus 2 and 5 ge- In 1976, postdoctoral fellow Susan Berget began nomes as well as several other serotypes. These maps using electron microscopy to examine the relationship were used to identify the viral regions that contained between cytoplasmic RNA and the DNA structure of cancer-causing genes. adenovirus. Both Sharp and Berget worked closely “The transcriptional pattern was important for un- with Claire Moore, a technician who ran MIT’s electron derstanding how the virus created tumors,” Sharp microscopy facility for the cancer center. Through her says. “It also set the table for a long-term curiosity: work with Sharp, Moore became familiar with a tech- ” The significance of heterogeneous nuclear RNA. nique called R-loop analysis, which at the time was a ’ When Sharp was recruited by MIT s cancer center, new method to map RNA sequences on a genome. By he and postdoctoral fellow Jane Flint extended the creating optimal conditions using a combination of ’ transcriptional maps of adenovirus. One of Sharp s salt, formamide, and heat, Moore could make an colleagues, molecular biologist Robert Weinberg, RNA strand hybridize with its complementary DNA. ran an adjacent laboratory on the fifth floor and stud- “You would see a bit of string, and there would be ied SV40. Both adenovirus and SV40 can produce a bubble where the RNA had hybridized with the DNA multiple copies of their genomes in infected cells, and displaced the other strand,” says Moore, now a enabling analysis. professor of developmental, molecular, and chemical “The reason that Phil Sharp, and I, and others biology at Tufts University. “Phil thought that would worked on DNA tumor viruses, like adenovirus and be a great way to map the adenovirus because you SV40, was actually not because we were interested could precisely map the location of each gene.” in cancer per se, but because these viruses clone their Adenovirus replicates efficiently, so when Berget own genomes for us,” says Weinberg, who is currently infected a human cell line, the majority of the messenger 1830 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1919416116 Suran Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 RNA (mRNA) molecules would be of viral origin; as its name suggests, mRNA serves as an intermediary tem- plate, transmitting information from DNA to proteins. Berget purified the most abundant viral mRNAs, which encode a capsid protein, and in collaboration with Moore, subjected the mRNAs to hybridization condi- tions in order to form R-loops with specific re- striction endonuclease fragments of the adenovirus genome. The resulting R-loops were visualized using electron microscopy, and the length of the R-loops and double-stranded DNA were measured to de- termine the gene’s location. “My task was to prepare the samples,” Moore says. “There were a lot of tricks to getting a good spread.” With a viscous solution of formamide and a ramp constructed from a slide that ran into another solution, Moore had to drop a sample on the slide at just the right place so it would spread onto a film. Once Berget and Moore collected the film on a tiny grid coated with plastic, they processed it for electron microscopy. This film was subsequently inserted into the electron microscope and examined for interpretable R-loop structures that were then photographed. To get accu- rate measurements, the micrographs were photograph- ically printed, and a “little map measurer,” as Moore puts it, was traced along each strand. Throughout this process for dozens of micrographs, something seemed off. “I was getting nice, uniform R-loops, but there were these little strands of single-stranded RNA stick- ing out at the ends of the R-loops, and I didn’t know what to do with them,” Moore says. Other laboratories had previously found that ade- novirus RNA in the nucleus was far longer than cytoplasmic mRNA. The team wondered if these long, viral RNAs were related to observations of cellular heterogeneous nuclear RNAs. Similar to adenovirus RNAs, these nuclear RNAs containing gene sequences were considerably longer than more stable mRNAs in Fig. 3. (A) Phillip Sharp receives the 1993 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine the cell cytoplasm. from King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden. Image courtesy of Tobbe Gustavsson/ Berget, Moore, and Sharp concluded that one of Reportagebild/TT/Sipa USA. (B) Richard Roberts receives the 1993 Nobel Prize in the extensions must be a polyadenosine tail that is Physiology or Medicine from King Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden. Image courtesy of AGIP/Rue des Archives/Granger, NYC. added posttranscriptionally to the end of mRNA and has nothing with which to hybridize. Assuming that the other tail was an artifact, possibly caused by DNA But 3 months and several experiments later, the rehybridizing and displacing RNA, the team con- extra tail was still a mystery. ducted a myriad of experiments. They eliminated “It was a puzzle until Sue presented the data at one the opposite DNA strand so nothing could compete of the floor meetings, and we got the idea that maybe with the end of the RNA. However, when the RNA it’s coming from a different region of the adenovirus,” hybridized to a single-stranded bit of DNA, the tail was Moore says. still present. Even trying different conditions of form- So the team tried hybridizing the RNA to a longer amide and salt proved unsuccessful. Nevertheless, piece of DNA. Sharp and his colleagues were determined to rule out “That’s when the little tail found its partner strands other explanations for the tail before proceeding.