DOCSLIB.ORG

Nextgen Airspace Optimization Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nextgen Airspace Optimization Study NextGEN Airspace Optimization Study Puget Sound Regional Council NextGEN Airspace Optimization Study BridgeNet International Team BridgeNet International Tetra Tech AMT Mead & Hunt Synergy Consultants Thales Puget Sound Regional Council Funding for this document provided in part by member jurisdictions, grants from U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation. PSRC fully com- plies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. For more information, or to obtain a Title VI Complaint Form, see http://www.psrc.org/about/public/titlevi or call 206-587-4819. American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information: Individuals requiring reasonable accommodations may request written materials in alternate formats, sign language interpret- ers, physical accessibility accommodations, or other reasonable accommodations by contacting the ADA Coordinator, Thu Le at 206-464-6175, with two weeks advance notice. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact the ADA Coordinator, Thu Le through TTY Relay 711. Additional copies of this document may be obtained by contacting: Puget Sound Regional Council Information Center 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98104-1035 206-464-7532 • [email protected] • psrc.org • MAY 2016 NextGen Airspace Optimization Study ______________________________________________ Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………….………………………………….…………….v Introduction …………………………………………………………..………………………………………………….…………………………. xii How to Use This Report ………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………... xiii Chapter 1 Key Issues for General Aviation Airports ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 1.1 1.1 NextGen Overview ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1.1 1.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1.1 1.1.2 Next Gen Programs .................................................................................................................... 1.2 ADS‐B Services ........................................................................................................................... 1.2 WAAS Progress .......................................................................................................................... 1.5 PBN Navigation .......................................................................................................................... 1.7 Data Communications ............................................................................................................... 1.8 1.2 Project Study Area .......................................................................................................................... 1.9 1.3 Heliports with Instrument Procedures ......................................................................................... 1.10 1.4 Key Airspace Issues in the Puget Sound Region ........................................................................... 1.14 1.5 Causes of Airspace Issues ............................................................................................................. 1.15 1.6 Resource Guide…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………1.16 Chapter 2 Inventory of Existing Information ……………………………………………..……………………………………………………… 2.1 2.1 Existing Activity Levels .................................................................................................................... 2.1 2.2 Historic Radar Data .................................................................................................................. 2.4 2.3 Determine Traffic Segregation by Operation ................................................................................. 2.4 2.4 Assess General Aviation Flight Tracks ....................................................................................... 2.5 2.5 Define Airspace Interaction ............................................................................................................ 2.6 2.6 Military Operating Areas .............................................................................................................. 2.12 2.7 Inventory Weather ....................................................................................................................... 2.14 2.8 Inventory Existing Airspace Facilities ............................................................................................ 2.15 2.9 Existing Procedures ................................................................................................................. 2.19 2.10 Avionics Equipage ......................................................................................................................... 2.25 2.11 Preliminary Identified Airspace Constraints ................................................................................. 2.27 i | Page NextGen Airspace Optimization Study ______________________________________________ Chapter 3 Evaluate Airspace Actions .......................................................................................................................... 3.1 3.1 Airspace Constraints ....................................................................................................................... 3.1 3.2 Potential Actions............................................................................................................................. 3.2 3.3 Puget Sound Regional Airspace - GA Airports ................................................................................ 3.4 3.3.1 T Routes over Cascades, East and West Bound ......................................................................... 3.4 3.3.2 RNAV Standard Instrument Departures (SID) for General Aviation Airports ............................ 3.7 3.4 King County Airport ...................................................................................................................... 3.13 3.4.1 RNAV (GPS) Approach during Plan C ....................................................................................... 3.13 3.5 Renton Municipal Airport ............................................................................................................. 3.16 3.5.1 RNAV (GPS) Approach, Runway 34 .......................................................................................... 3.16 3.5.2 RNP-AR Approach, Runway 16 ................................................................................................ 3.19 3.6 Paine Field .................................................................................................................................... 3.22 3.6.1T or Y Transitions for RNAV (GPS) Arrival, Runway 34R .............................................................. 3.22 Chapter 4 Evaluate Airspace Actions …………………………………………………………………….…………………………………...………..4.1 4.1 Obstacle Sources & Terminology ………………….………………………………………………………………….....……4.3 4.2 Runway Threshold Siting Surface (TSS) Evaluation ........................................................................ 4.4 4.2.1 Auburn Municipal Airport (S50) ................................................................................................. 4.8 4.2.2 Boeing Field – King County International Airport (KBFI) ........................................................... 4.8 4.2.3 Bremerton National Airport (KPWT) ........................................................................................ 4.10 4.2.4 Crest Airpark (S36) ................................................................................................................... 4.10 4.2.5 Harvey Field (S43) .................................................................................................................... 4.11 4.2.6 Renton Municipal Airport (RNT) .............................................................................................. 4.11 4.2.7 Snohomish County Airport – Paine Field (PAE) ....................................................................... 4.13 4.2.8 Tacoma Narrows (TIW) ............................................................................................................ 4.14 4.2.9 Pierce County Airport – Thun Field (PLU) ................................................................................ 4.14 Chapter 5 Next Steps ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………..……... 5.1 5.1 Implementation One: Airport Approach Surfaces .......................................................................... 5.1 5.2 Implementation Two: Promote NextGen and GA in Puget Sound ................................................. 5.1 5.3 Implementation Three: NextGen Enhancements for Implementation Package to the FAA .......... 5.2 5.4 Implementation Four: Promote Other Available Options .............................................................. 5.2 List of Tables 1.1 Study Area Airports ………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………… 1.9 1.2 Heliports Located in the Study Area ……………………………….…………………………………………………….. 1.13 1.3 Airspace Issues…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………1.14 1.4 Causes of Airspace Issues…………………………………………………………………………………………………………1.15 2.1 Aircraft Activity Levels for 2013 by Airport……………………………….……………………….………..…………… 2.2 2.2 Towered Airport Operations for 2013 ………………………………..……………………………………….……...….. 2.3 ii | P a g e NextGen Airspace Optimization Study ______________________________________________ 2.3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington
    Informational Handout: King County International Airport-Boeing Field Seattle, Washington Published Visual Flight Rules (VFR) routes for arrivals and departures. Project Background The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cancelled two existing VFR routes for aircraft landing and departing King County International Airport-Boeing Field (KBFI) and replaced them with newly defined routes (retaining some of the existing names). The term “routes” can best be described in this instance as a “set of pre-coordinated instructions” that is given to VFR pilots. The routes enhance safety by increasing separation between arrival and departure flows into KBFI, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (KSEA), and Renton Municipal Airport (KRNT). Purpose of Changes There have been Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) events involving VFR aircraft arriving and departing KBFI, and these routes are intended to reduce TCAS events and enhance safety. TCAS monitors the airspace around an aircraft for other aircraft equipped with proper equipment, independent of air traffic control, and warns pilots of the presence of other properly equipped aircraft in the immediate area. Project Description The project results in a change to past operating procedures by publishing several existing routes for VFR aircraft to use when arriving and departing from either runway configuration at KBFI. KBFI Airport Traffic Control Tower (BFI ATCT) now has the ability to assign published routes rather than issuing tailored instructions. The new VFR routes provide better predictability, enhance safety, and improve the segregation of aircraft arriving and departing KBFI. What Changed The new VFR routes follow pre-existing air traffic flight tracks that are assigned by BFI ATCT and no new areas will experience new air traffic overflights.
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasts of Aviation Activity
    CHAPTER B Forecasts of Aviation Activity: Forecasting is a key element in any airport master planning process. The forecast process is essential for analyzing existing airport facilities and identifying further needs and requirements of the facilities that may arise over the next 20 years. The relationship between aviation activity and projected demand is an indicator as to the type, timing, and allocation of future airport infrastructure, equipment, and service needs. For the purposes of this Airport Master Plan, the most important element of the forecasts chapter is the documentation of existing aircraft operations by type and size of aircraft as well as the future projections of operations by type and size of aircraft. One of the assumed outcomes of this planning process was that the type and size of aircraft using the Airport on a regular basis are larger than what RNT was originally designed for. The trend of more operations by larger design aircraft is forecast to continue and warrants a design standard change for RNT. This change in design standards is further discussed starting on Page B.37 with the conclusion being that the Airport is, in fact, in need of a design standards upgrade in accordance with FAA guidance. Introduction. The RNT aviation activity forecasts in this chapter are developed for a 20-year planning period and are based on historic activity, industry trends, local socioeconomic data, and changes at RNT since the completion of previous planning studies. The forecasts utilize FY2015 (October 2014 through September 2015) as the base year and project future activity through 2035, identified in 5-year increments.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asos) Implementation Plan
    AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVING SYSTEM (ASOS) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN VAISALA CEILOMETER - CL31 November 14, 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service / Office of Operational Systems/Observing Systems Branch National Weather Service / Office of Science and Technology/Development Branch Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary............................................................................ iii 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... 1 1.1 Background.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose................................................................................. 2 1.3 Scope.................................................................................... 2 1.4 Applicable Documents......................................................... 2 1.5 Points of Contact.................................................................. 4 2.0 Pre-Operational Implementation Activities ............................ 6 3.0 Operational Implementation Planning Activities ................... 6 3.1 Planning/Decision Activities ............................................... 7 3.2 Logistic Support Activities .................................................. 11 3.3 Configuration Management (CM) Activities....................... 12 3.4 Operational Support Activities ............................................ 12 4.0 Operational Implementation (OI) Activities .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Diagram Airport Diagram
    12096 EVERETT/ SNOHOMISH COUNTY (PAINE FIELD) (PAE) AIRPORT DIAGRAM AL-142 (FAA) EVERETT, WASHINGTON ATIS 128.65 BOEING PAINE TOWER PLANT 120.2 256.7 (East of RWY 16L-34R) 132.95 256.7 (West of RWY 16R-34L) GND CON 121.8 339.8 200 X CLNC DEL 220 126.75 AA ELEV 16R 563 A1 K1 162.0^ ILS ILS HOLD HOLD A 47^55'N BOEING 9010 X 150 A2 RAMP RWY 11-29 S-30 RWY 16L-34R S-12.5 A3 RWY 16R-34L NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV S-100, D-200, 2S-175 TWR CUSTOMS 2D-350, 2D/2D2-830 11 A4 787 B .A OUTER ELEV RAMP VAR 17.1^ E 561 NORTH 117.0^ C RAMP INNER C1 JANUARY 2010 D1 RAMP TERMINAL ELEV A5 16L D-3 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE D-3 4514 X 75 C 597 0.2^ W X G1 F1 A6 X D2 CENTRAL X G2 F2 HS 1 RAMP X D3 162.5^ X H D 3000 X 75 A X X X D40.9% UP G3 EAST WEST X X RAMP RAMP W3 X NW-1, 18 OCT 2012 to 15 NOV FIRE F X STATION 297.0^ D5 FIELD K7 A7 E G4 ELEV F4 ELEV A8 SOUTH 29 600 606 RAMP G 342.5^ 47^54'N 342.0^ G5 A G6 HS 2 F6 A9 A 34R ELEV ELEV 578 596 A10 34L 400 X 220 HS 3 CAUTION: BE ALERT TO RUNWAY CROSSING CLEARANCES. READBACK OF ALL RUNWAY HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS IS REQUIRED.
    [Show full text]
  • Pierce County Public Works and Utilities Brian J
    Pierce County Public Works and Utilities Brian J. Ziegler, P.E. 2702 South 42nd Street, Suite 201 Director Tacoma, Washington 98409-7322 [email protected] piercecountywa.org/pwu TO: Dan Roach, Chair Pierce County Council FROM: Deb Wallace, Airport and Ferry Administrator DATE: October 28, 2014 SUBJECT: Airport Security The purpose of this briefing paper is to provide an update to Council on the status of security upgrades at Pierce County's airports. Current Situation: The Pierce County Airport and Ferry division is in the process of upgrading gate access, fencing, and security lighting at both airports. In 2015 the division will implement an Airport Watch program to increase the safety and security at each facility. The improvements are being made due to incidents which have occurred at the airports over the last several years and at the request of airport tenants. Currently both airports are fenced with restricted access gates to enhance security, although there are gaps in the fencing allowing unauthorized pedestrian entry. These gaps will be addressed in early 2015. An electronic gate is being added to the north gate at Tacoma Narrows Airport (TIW) and the south gate is being outfitted with a mechanism to allow its use by those who are hearing impaired. Once that improvement is completed, 24 hour security will be implemented at TIW. Thun Field currently operates with 24 hour gate security. Prior to implementation, the airport commissions at each airport discussed airport security measures during the preceding year and staff coordinated the implementation of the security measures with airport tenants.
    [Show full text]
  • Tacoma Narrows Airport Advisory Commission
    TACOMA NARROWS AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION July 14, 2020 A meeting of the Pierce County Tacoma Narrows Airport Advisory Commission (TNAAC) was held on Tuesday, July 14, 2020 from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. in a virtual TEAMS meeting format. I. Call to Order & Welcome Chair Kurt Grimmer called the meeting to order at 6:30 PM. TNAAC VOTING MEMBERS Present: Kurt Grimmer, Chair Tim Toerber, Vice Chair Larry Fickel Bob Felker – joined after roll call Brad Pattison – joined after roll call Excused: Brian Durham, Wiley Moore, Edward Lewis, Garth Jackson TNAAC NON-VOTING MEMBERS Present: Rod Propst, Pierce County Airport Manager; Katrina Knutson for Mayor Kuhn Excused: Derek Young, Council District 7; Kit Kuhn, Gig Harbor Mayor PIERCE COUNTY STAFF Present: Rod Propst, Airport Manager/Asst. Administrator Cindy Willis, Office Assistant VISITORS Present: Approximately 17 members of the public joined the TEAMS meeting. • Reports • O&M Report – Rod Propst Peninsula School District high schools had graduation parades at the airport. A few County employees volunteered, and Tacoma Narrows Aviation allowed them to cross in front of their hangars; everyone was pleased with the event. Justin has been mowing grass for the past two weeks; we’ll send the big mower back to Thun Field next week. We’re working with the road division to crack-seal the taxiway; the runway will be repainted to comply with FAA regulations. We’re working to get extra hires for the airports; the Parks employees served us well and we were sorry to see them go. • Wings & Wheels – Doug Fratoni was not in attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Renton Seaplane Base Maintenance Dredging, Challenges Beyond the Scope of Maintenance Dredging
    Proceedings of Western Dredging Association and Texas A&M University Center for Dredging Studies' "Dredging Summit and Expo 2015" CITY OF RENTON SEAPLANE BASE MAINTENANCE DREDGING, CHALLENGES BEYOND THE SCOPE OF MAINTENANCE DREDGING J. G. Dawson1, R. S. Phillips2 ABSTRACT The City of Renton’s (City) Will Rogers-Wiley Memorial Seaplane Base is located at the southern end of Lake Washington in Renton, Washington, adjacent to the Cedar River delta. Maintenance dredging was required at the end of 2013 in order to mitigate for Cedar River flooding that occurred in 2009, which caused large amounts of sediment to be deposited near the existing seaplane base facilities. Built-up sediment near the temporary mooring facilities and access ramp had a significant effect on seaplane pilot safety, due to limited depths during taxi, take-off and landing operations. Coast & Harbor Engineering was hired to assist with regulatory permitting, final design and assist with construction management during dredging operations. Several issues related to permitting, the development of feasible design criteria, and restriction son construction operations, made dredging at the seaplane base challenging. The first issue of the project was that a portion of the dredge prism was within Washington State submerged lands, which meant the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) was partially responsible for providing financial assistance to the City of Renton for dredging activities as part of mitigating the effects of the 2009 flood event. Second, a portion of the dredge prism was within privately owned submerged lands requiring the City to obtain easements to dredge these areas. Third, King Country Metro sewer lines and private communication lines restricted the dredge prism to strict offsets, limited room for construction equipment and required atypical dredge cuts.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study
    LLakea k e tot o SSoundo u n d TTrailr a i l FEASIBILITY STUDY June 2009 Acknowledgements King County City of Renton City of Tukwila City of SeaTac City of Burien City of Des Moines Sound Transit Washington State Department of Transportation Cascade Bicycle Club this page intentionally left blank Lake to Sound Trail Feasibility Study Introduction - Painting the Picture of the Trail Picture a route that connects the southern end of Lake Washington, where the Cedar River fl ows into the lake, to Puget Sound, a majestic body of water. Th is trail would connect the cities of Renton, Tukwila, SeaTac, Burien, and Des Moines, as well as the recreational, residential, retail, and employment areas within these cities. Starting at the southern end of Lake Washington in Renton, the trail follows the existing Cedar River Trail south along the banks of the Cedar River into Cedar River Park. Th e trail meanders by the Renton Municipal Airport, with its long and proud heritage of serving planes inspired by Boeing’s top designers, and skirts the northern edge of the downtown district of Renton. Th e trail off ers excellent views of and access to the Cedar River. At the Cedar River Park, one can continue along the river to the City of Seattle’s Cedar River Watershed or turn west to follow the Lake to Sound Trail. Continuing west into downtown Renton, the trail connects through Tonkin Park to the old Renton train station, which served the Spirit of Washington dinner train. At this point, the trail follows the railroad tracks, which provide sweeping regional views of Renton and eventually plunge into the forested canopy of the Black River Riparian Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • B Forecasts of Aviation Activity
    B Forecasts of Aviation Activity INTRODUCTION. The aviation demand projections are documented in the following sections: ▪ Historical and Exiting Aviation Activity ▪ Previous Forecasts ▪ Factors Affecting Aviation Forecasts ▪ Forecast Methodologies ▪ Forecast of Aviation Demand Activity o Commercial Passenger Enplanement & Operations Forecast o Air Cargo Weight & Operations Forecast o General Aviation Operations Forecast o Military Aircraft Operations Forecast o Aircraft Operations Forecast (Mix, Peaking, Critical Planning Aircraft) o General Aviation Based Aircraft Forecast ▪ Runway Design Code (RDC)/Critical Aircraft Analysis ▪ FAA TAF Comparison and Forecast Conclusion Aviation forecasts are time-based projections offering a reasonable expectation of future airport activity. The forecast of activity projections influences nearly every aspect of the MP Update process. The relationship between current activity and forecast demand is an indicator as to the type and timing of future airport infrastructure, equipment, and service needs, as well as funding resource allocation. The forecasts are prepared annually for a 20-year planning period, from 2015 through 2035, identified in five- year increments, and segmented into three planning phases: ▪ ‘Near-term’ (2015-2020) ▪ ‘Mid-term’ (2021-2025) ▪ ‘Long-term’ (2025-2035) The forecasts are developed consistent with FAA forecasting guidance, reflecting the current baseline of airport activity levels, user trends, and industry-wide activity patterns. The forecasts are considered “unconstrained”, in that they assume the Airport is sufficiently able to accommodate the demand either through existing facilities or future improvements. B.1 It should also be understood there are typically year-to-year fluctuations to forecast activity due to various unanticipated factors and unforeseen demand circumstances (e.g., changes in emerging airport markets and national aviation trends, including economic factors, both nationally and regionally.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Operations Manual
    Flight Operations Manual Rainier Flight Service LLC, located at Renton Municipal Airport is owned and operated as: Rainier Flight Service 800 W Perimeter Rd Renton, WA 98057 © 2011 Rainier Flight Service (v 2.6.3) Page 1 Flight Operations Manual 1. General ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 About This Manual ................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Proprietary Information ......................................................................................... 5 1.3 Familiarity with Contents ....................................................................................... 5 1.4 Definitions ............................................................................................................ 5 2. Rules of Conduct ................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Abusive Language ................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Tobacco Products ................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Intoxicants ........................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Controlled Substances and Medications ................................................................... 6 2.5 Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RTC Class Schedule Below Is a List of the Scheduled Classes at RTC
    RTC Class Schedule Below is a list of the scheduled classes at RTC. You can search for classes by using the filters below. Need help? Contact an entry adviser or your instructor. Classes and modes of instruction subject to change depending on state orders related to COVID-19. Classes that are delivered online may or may not have required virtual meeting times (for example, meetings via Zoom). • For classes that meet virtually, there are days and times listed to note the meeting times. • For classes that do not meet virtually, the days and times are listed as “arranged” (“ARR” or “ARRANGED”). Your instructor will provide more information about each class. Please visit our eLearning page for more information about modality options at RTC. ACCOUNTING ACCT 124 - SMALL BUSINESS ACCOUNTING - 5.0 credits This course introduces the student to preprogrammed computer software used to efficiently manage general ledgers, accounts receivable, accounts payable, depreciation, inventory, payroll and financial statements in a small business. Item# Days Time Location Date Delivery Instructor Fees Status Note $12.00 Per Apr Open 0 Course - Optional Zoom sessions on ARR- 6 - NEWCOME Enrolled / ARRANGED ONLINE ONLINE ONLINE MTWTh 10:00am-11:00am, with ARR Jun J 30 Seats ELEARNING recordings provided on Canvas. 23 Available FEE ACCOUNTING ACCT 275 - TAXATION II - BUSINESS ENTITIES - 5.0 credits Income tax principles relating to MACRS depreciation, capital gains and losses, preparing a partnership and corporate return. S- Corporations and Limited Liability Companies will be discussed. The course will also discuss income tax administration as well as preparing forms 940 and 941 and introduce the state of Washington's combined Business and Occupation (B&O) tax.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No. 1189 Gig Harbor, Washington
    RESOLUTION NO. 1189 A RESOLUTION OF THE Cinr COUNCIL OF THE CH-Y OF GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON, EXPRESSING THE CITY'S OPPOSITION TO ANY RECOMMENDATION OF BROAD- SCALE EXPANSION OF THE TACOMA NARROWS AIRPORT WHEREAS,both the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and the Washington State Commercial Aviation Coordinating Commission (CACC) are conducting studies on the potential for the expansion of commercial aviation in western Washington State; and WHEREAS, both the PSRC and the CACC have identified the Tacoma Narrows Airport as a location with potential for expansion; and WHEREAS,expansion of the Tacoma NarrowsAirport will lead to increased traffic problems to the already highly congested SR 16 corridor. The increase in trafficwill likely overwhelm the infrastructure capacity of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, SR 16, 36th Street and Olympic Drive; and WHEREAS, increased commercial air traffic will lead to intolerable noise and air pollution for residents in and around the City of Gig Harbor. Such pollution would destroy the City's charm and appeal as working waterfront community and would decimate the City's tourism and real estate industries. The harbor would become an extended airline approach runway path for airplanes at a terrible cost to the City; and WHEREAS,expanded runway length at Tacoma NarrowsAirport may result in the need to condemn public and privatelyowned land; and WHEREAS, Pierce County, in its capacity as the sponsor of the airport, has expressed no interest in pursuing expansion of the Tacoma NarrowsAirport; and WHEREAS,the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has identified several limitations of the Tacoma NarrowsAirport's suitabilityfor expansion including runway length, acreage availability, traffic congestion, strong community opposition, and the natural Puget Sound barrierto access; NOW, THEREFORE, THE C\TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.
    [Show full text]