DOCSLIB.ORG

Reason, Desire, and the Will: in Defense of a Tripartite Moral Psychology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reason, Desire, and the Will: in Defense of a Tripartite Moral Psychology Reason, Desire, and the Will: In Defense of a Tripartite Moral Psychology By Jeremy Carey A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Hannah Ginsborg, Co-Chair Professor R. Jay Wallace, Co-Chair Professor Kinch Hoekstra Summer 2017 Abstract Reason, Desire, and the Will: In Defense of a Tripartite Moral Psychology by Jeremy Carey Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professor R. Jay Wallace, Co-Chair Professor Hannah Ginsborg, Co-Chair Which aspects of our psychology are most central to explaining our intentional actions, and how should we conceive of them in light of their abilities to play those explanatory roles? These are key questions in moral psychology, and my dissertation tries to answer them, or at least to provide a beginning. As with much else in philosophy, the basic contours of this debate first came to us in Plato. Though I am not primarily concerned with the historical details, the initial argument of the dissertation and its distinctive approach reflect these Platonic origins in an interesting way. In Plato’s Protagoras, he presents Socrates as having an intellectualist moral psychology; that is, as claiming that all intentional action is motivated by a belief about what is best. This leads him to argue against the possibility of weakness of will. Plato himself later rejected this view, most notably in the Republic. There he argued that properly accounting for psychological conflict required dividing the soul into three “parts” - rational, spirited, and appetitive. I argue for what can be seen as a contemporary analogue of this later Platonic view; in particular, I argue that making sense of important aspects of our agency requires thinking of 1 ourselves as having three distinct motivational capacities, which I identify as reason, desire, and the will. I begin by arguing that we can only act akratically, that is, against our judgment about what we ought to do, if there is a way to act for a reason besides our faculty of reason. This is because in such cases we have already formed a judgment about what we have most reason to do, and there is nothing besides this that can plausibly be attributed to an act of reasoning. And yet we do act akratically, and when we do so we act on the “weaker reason”. So there must be some other way to act for a reason than through reason. An obvious suggestion is that we act in such cases through desire. However, once we introduce this division between reason and desire, I argue that we will need a third, which I call the will - a capacity to consciously decide to act a certain way when reason and desire are insufficient or in conflict. Though the appeal to desire in the initial argument in some ways seems obvious, to speak of desire, especially as a motivational capacity alongside reason, is to be embroiled in controversies that have dominated philosophical thinking about action since the early modern period. So I dedicate three chapters to defending the approach to desire appealed to by my tripartite theory. In the first, I argue against the “Humean” dispositionalist account of desire in favor of an evaluative conception. In the second, I argue that most recent evaluative accounts either fail to show how desire is really evaluative or else are overly intellectualized. In the third, I argue that we should think of desire as a form of responsiveness to apparent reasons, and show how this fits with both animal as well as human desire. The last part of the tripartite view to be discussed is the will, which I introduce by way of a discussion of intention. I start by arguing that intention is a type of commitment to action that cannot be reduced to beliefs or desires, though in many cases beliefs and desires lead directly to intentions. Once we have this distinction between beliefs and desires and intentions, we can say more explicitly what the will is - it is a capacity to decide, where that involves the deliberate act of forming an intention. The basic claim of the tripartite view, that there are three distinct sources of motivation, can now be put in terms of intention, i.e., as saying that there 2 are three distinct routes to an intention - evaluative judgment (a conclusion of practical reasoning), desire, and decision. In the final chapter, I briefly apply the view to the problem of identification, an issue in moral psychology which might initially seem to be particularly difficult to account for on the tripartite view. On the contrary, I argue that the tripartite view has certain advantages over other approaches, and sketching what I call the character view of identification allows me both to review the basic shape of the tripartite view and demonstrate once more its wide appeal. 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................. i Preface ................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Akrasia and the Diversity of Motivation, or Why Plato was (Basically) Right: A New Defense of Tripartition ........................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Acting on the Weaker Reason .................................................................................. 3 Two Responses ............................................................................................................ 6 Towards Tripartition .................................................................................................. 9 Reason and Desire ................................................................................................... 9 The Will ................................................................................................................... 13 Putting It All Together ............................................................................................ 15 Chapter 2: Desire and Reasons for Action: In Defense of the Evaluative Conception ......................................................................................................... 17 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 17 Desire and Reasons on the Humean Approach .................................................. 18 Desire and Evaluation: Against Humeanism ...................................................... 23 Desire, Rationalization, and Quinn’s Radio Man ............................................. 23 Objections and Replies ............................................................................................ 28 Copp and Sobel on Quinn and Scanlon ............................................................. 28 Response ................................................................................................................. 31 Desires and Anti-Psychologism about Reasons ................................................. 35 Chapter 3: Two Constraints on an Evaluative Account of Desire, and Some Failed Attempts to Meet Them ........................................................... 40 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 40 The Two Constraints ................................................................................................ 41 Scanlon on Desire ..................................................................................................... 45 Stampe and Tenenbaum on Desire ....................................................................... 47 Moving Forward ....................................................................................................... 53 Chapter 4: Desire as Responsiveness to Reasons ....................................... 54 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 54 Animal Action and Animal Desire: Preliminary Thoughts ............................. 55 The Structure of Reasons, the Structure of Desire ............................................. 57 Reasons, Goodness, and Aristotle on the Nature of Animals .......................... 60 i Responsiveness to Reasons and Responsiveness to Reasons As Such ........... 63 Conclusion on Desire ............................................................................................... 69 Chapter 5: Intention and the Will .................................................................. 70 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 70 Intention for the Future ........................................................................................... 72 Intentions in Action ................................................................................................. 74 Intention and Agency .............................................................................................. 76 Decision and the Will .............................................................................................. 82 What does the Will have to do with Willpower? ............................................... 86 Putting it All Together ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies
    Concept of Happiness in Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies Von der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften der Universität Duisburg-Essen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) genehmigte Dissertation von Jaison Ambadan Chacko Ambadan aus Areekamala, Kerala, Indien Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ralf Miggelbrink Zweiter Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Markus Tiwald Vorsitzender des Prüfungsausschusses: Prof. Dr. Neil Roughley Tag der Disputation: 02.07.2018 1 Concept of Happiness in Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies General Introduction 6 Chapter I The Ethical Perspective of Happiness in Aquinas´s Concept of Human Acts Introduction 27 1. Human Acts 31 1.1 Voluntary 52 1.2 Involuntary 53 1.3 Circumstances 54 1.3.1 Nature of Circumstance 55 1.3.2 Role Circumstances in Moral Evaluation 56 1.4 Cognitive Participation 57 1.4.1 Three Acts of the Speculative Intellect 58 1.4.2 Three Acts of the Practical Intellect 60 1.5 The Will 62 1.5.1 Cause of the Movement of the Will 62 1.5.2 Manner in which the Will Moves 63 1.5.3 Characteristics of the Act of the Will 64 1.5.3.1 Enjoyment 65 1.5.3.2 Intention 65 1.5.3.3 Choice 67 1.5.3.4 Counsel 68 1.5.3.5 Consent 68 1.5.3.6 Use 69 1.6 Human Acts Commanded by the Will 70 1.6.1 Good and Evil in Human Acts 71 1.6.2 Goodness and Malice in Human Acts 72 1.6.3 Impact of the Interior Act 75 1.6.4 Impact of the External Act 76 1.6.5 Impact of Disposition 77 Conclusion 79 2 Chapter II Thomas Aquinas´s Cognition of Passion and Happiness Introduction 82 2.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Experience of Encountering Art in Museum Spaces: an Inquiry with Gilles Deleuze's Concepts of Desire and Assemblage
    ON THE EXPERIENCE OF ENCOUNTERING ART IN MUSEUM SPACES: AN INQUIRY WITH GILLES DELEUZE'S CONCEPTS OF DESIRE AND ASSEMBLAGE by Marie-France Berard B.A., The University of Montreal, 1992 M.A., The University of Montreal, 2004 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Curriculum Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) November 2017 © Marie-France Berard, 2017 ABSTRACT Framed by the theoretical concepts of assemblage and desire from philosopher Gilles Deleuze, and his collaborative writings with psychoanalyst Félix Guattari (Deleuze and Guattari, 1983, 1987), this study inquires into the qualities and productive potential of the art encounter in a gallery setting. The study brings together my practice in the field of art museum education, and my interest in the art encounter to inquire what the art encounter does. Thinking with Deleuzian concepts enacts a view of the art encounter as a milieu of experimentation where affects move a body to create assemblages, connections with things, human and non-human bodies, expressions, qualities, ideas, spaces. Assemblages allow desire (as a force) to circulate; desiring-assemblages move bodies to produce connections with other human or non-human entities, thoughts, they produce subjectivation as a mode of existence. For Deleuze, one does not 'have' an experience of an artwork or exhibition detached against the background of life; experience is a milieu which contributes to actually making life. My study inquires how working within a philosophy conceived in terms of relationality, connections, flows and multiplicity (rather than fixed identities) enact a view of the art encounter as a milieu of immanent ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Conversion and Therapy of Desire in Augustine's
    ABSTRACT The Conversion and Therapy of Desire in Augustine’s Cassiciacum Dialogues Mark J. Boone, Ph.D. Directors: Thomas S. Hibbs, Ph.D., and Michael P. Foley, Ph.D. The philosophical schools of late antiquity commonly diagnosed human unhappiness as rooted in some fundamental disorder in our desires, and offered various therapies or prescriptions for the healing of desire. Among these only the neo-Platonic treatment for desire requires redirecting desire towards an immaterial world. Although Augustine agrees with the neo-Platonists on the need to redirect our desires to an immaterial world, he does not adopt their therapy for desire. Instead he adopts a thoroughly Christian approach to the healing of desire. The conversion of desire results from the Trinitarian God’s gracious actions taken to heal our desires. Augustine does not recommend fleeing from the influence of the body, as neo-Platonism encourages, but fleeing to Christ, immersing ourselves in the life of the Church, and practicing the theological virtues. In this dissertation I examine Augustine’s Cassiciacum dialogues. In Contra Academicos (Against the Academics), Augustine argues that we must vigorously desire wisdom in order to attain it; that we must have hope in the possibility of attaining wisdom; and that our desire for wisdom must be bound in faith to Christ. In De beata vita (On the Happy Life), Augustine argues that the Trinitarian God is the only perennially satisfying object of desire and shows that the pursuit of God is the activity of a prayerful community of believers who are practicing faith, hope, and charity. In De ordine (On Order), Augustine recommends that the reordering of our desires be pursued through a liberal arts education and through Christian morals.
    [Show full text]
  • L'abecedaire De Gilles Deleuze, Avec Claire Parnet
    1 L'Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze, avec Claire Parnet Directed by Pierre-André Boutang (1996) Translation & Notes: Charles J. Stivale Credits (shown at the end of each tape): Conversation: Claire Parnet Direction: Pierre-André Boutang, Michel Pamart Image: Alain Thiollet Sound: Jean Maini Editing: Nedjma Scialom Sound Mix: Vianney Aubé, Rémi Stengel Images from Vincennes: Marielle Burkhalter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Translated and edited by Charles J. Stivale --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prelude \1 A short description of the trailer and then of the interview "set" is quite useful: the black and white trailer over which the title, then the director’s credit are shown, depicts Deleuze lecturing to a crowded, smoky seminar, his voice barely audible over the musical accompaniment. The subtitle, “Université de Vincennes, 1980,” appears briefly at the lower right, and Deleuze’s desk is packed with tape recorders. A second shot is a close-up of Deleuze chatting with the students seated closest to him. Then another shot shows students in the seminar listening intently, most of them (including a young Claire Parnet in profile) smoking cigarettes. The final shot again shows Deleuze lecturing from his desk at the front of the seminar room, gesticulating as he speaks. The final gesture shows him placing his hand over his chin in a freeze-frame, punctuating the point he has just made. As for the setting in Deleuze’s apartment during the interview, the viewer sees Deleuze seated in front of a sideboard over which hangs a mirror, and opposite him sits Parnet, smoking constantly throughout. On the dresser to the right of the mirror is his trademark hat perched on a hook.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Structuralism Volume 2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank History of Structuralism
    DJFHKJSD History of Structuralism Volume 2 This page intentionally left blank History of Structuralism Volume 2: The Sign Sets, 1967-Present Francois Dosse Translated by Deborah Glassman University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis London The University of Minnesota Press gratefully acknowledges financial assistance provided by the French Ministry of Culture for the translation of this book. Copyright 1997 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota Originally published as Histoire du structuralisme, 11. Le chant du cygne, de 1967 anos jour«; Copyright Editions La Decouverte, Paris, 1992. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press III Third Avenue South, Suite 290, Minneapolis, MN 554°1-2520 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper http://www.upress.umn.edu First paperback edition, 1998 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dosse, Francois, 1950- [Histoire du structuralisme. English] History of structuralism I Francois Dosse ; translated by Deborah Glassman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Contents: v. 1. The rising sign, 1945-1966-v. 2. The sign sets, 1967-present. ISBN 0-8166-2239-6 (v. I: he: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2241-8 (v. I: pbk. : alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2370-8 (v. 2: hc: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2371-6 (v. 2: pbk. : alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2240-X (set: hc: alk. paper}.-ISBN 0-8166-2254-X (set: pbk.
    [Show full text]
  • Twentieth-Century French Philosophy Twentieth-Century French Philosophy
    Twentieth-Century French Philosophy Twentieth-Century French Philosophy Key Themes and Thinkers Alan D. Schrift ß 2006 by Alan D. Schrift blackwell publishing 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Alan D. Schrift to be identified as the Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2006 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1 2006 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schrift, Alan D., 1955– Twentieth-Century French philosophy: key themes and thinkers / Alan D. Schrift. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-3217-6 (hardcover: alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-4051-3217-5 (hardcover: alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-3218-3 (pbk.: alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-4051-3218-3 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Philosophy, French–20th century. I. Title. B2421.S365 2005 194–dc22 2005004141 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Set in 11/13pt Ehrhardt by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed and bound in India by Gopsons Papers Ltd The publisher’s policy is to use permanent paper from mills that operate a sustainable forestry policy, and which has been manufactured from pulp processed using acid-free and elementary chlorine-free practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial: Postanarchism
    Editorial: Postanarchism SAUL NEWMAN Postanarchism is emerging as an important new current in anarchist thought, and it is the source of growing interest and debate amongst anarchist activists and scholars alike, as well as in broader academic circles. Given the number of internet sites, discussion groups, and new books and journal publications appearing on postanarchism, it is time that the challenges it poses to classical anarchist thought and practice are taken more seriously. Postanarchism refers to a wide body of theory – encompassing political theory, philosophy, aesthetics, literature and film studies – which attempts to explore new directions in anarchist thought and politics. While it includes a number of different perspectives and trajectories, the central contention of postanarchism is that classical anarchist philosophy must take account of new theoretical directions and cultural phenomena, in particular, postmodernity and poststructuralism. While these theoretical categories have had a major impact on different areas of scholarship and thought, as well as politics, anarchism tends to have remained largely resistant to these developments and continues to work within an Enlightenment humanist epistemological framework1 which many see as being in need of updating. At the same time, anarchism – as a form of political theory and practice – is becoming increasingly important to radical struggles and global social movements today, to a large extent supplanting Marxism. Postanarchism seeks to revitalise anarchist theory in light of these new struggles and forms of resistance. However, rather than dismissing the tradition of classical anarchism, postanarchism, on the contrary, seeks to explore its potential and radicalise its possibilities. It remains entirely consistent, I would suggest, with the libertarian and egal- itarian horizon of anarchism; yet it seeks to broaden the terms of anti-authoritarian thought to include a critical analysis of language, discourse, culture and new modalities of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivational Tranquility: a Theory of Value and Welfare
    Velichkov 1 Motivational Tranquility: A Theory of Value and Welfare Alexander R. Velichkov (student number: 10525475) MA Philosophy Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Beate Roessler Second Reader: Dr. Thomas Nys 17 August, 2018 Velichkov 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Chapter 1: Valuing 7 1.1 Intrinsic and extrinsic values 7 1.2 Values as preferences 8 1.3 Valued and valuable objects 10 1.4 The mind dependency of values 12 Chapter 2: The TTT and TTTV 15 2.1 The Tranquility and Turmoil Theory (TTT) 15 2.2 The meaning of motivational tranquility 18 2.3 How tranquility determines choice 21 2.4 Tranquilitism and hedonism 22 2.5 The Tranquility and Turmoil Theory of Value (TTTV) 25 Chapter 3: The TTTW 28 3.1 Welfare as quality of subjective experience 28 3.2 The Tranquility and Turmoil Theory of Welfare (TTTW) 30 3.2 Against desire satisfactionism 32 3.3 Welfare and the good life 34 Chapter 4: Objections 36 4.1 The static life 36 4.2 False pleasures 38 4.3 Worthless and offensive pleasures 40 4.4 The experience machine 41 4.5 Artificial tranquility 43 Velichkov 3 Conclusion 45 Appendix A: The Paradox of Hedonism 46 References 47 Velichkov 4 Motivational Tranquility: A Theory of Value and Welfare Introduction When a person looks back at the good moments in her life, what would she see? Perhaps she would recall moments of calm appreciation, such as when she marveled at the world from a mountaintop or when she saw her newborn baby for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • BUDDHIST WELL-BEING Christopher W. Gowans Fordham University
    BUDDHIST WELL-BEING Christopher W. Gowans Fordham University ([email protected]) Buddhism is a religion in some obvious respects, but many of its practices are animated to a surprising extent by a striking philosophical outlook. However, serious philosophical reflection on Buddhism by those trained in Western philosophy has a fairly short history, gaining momentum only in the past fifty years or so. This has produced some very impressive results, yet, I suspect, in many ways philosophical scholarship on Buddhism is probably still at an early stage of its development. Much remains to be done, especially in the area of moral philosophy.1 There are at least three kinds of questions that such scholarship might address, pertaining respectively to understanding, comparison and criticism. First, what is the proper philosophical elucidation of Buddhist ideas? Second, in what ways, if any, do these ideas relate to ideas in Western philosophy (contemporary as well as historical)? Finally, to what extent might these two domains—Buddhist philosophy and Western philosophy—learn from one another and challenge one another? That is, to what extent might they critically interact so as to advance our philosophical understanding?2 In this paper, I will outline some ways in which these questions might be answered with regard to the concept of well-being, one of the fundamental topics in both Buddhism and contemporary moral philosophy. My focus will be the Buddhism of the Pāli Canon and closely related early texts. There are three primary ways in which Buddhism is committed to an understanding of well-being. First, according to the doctrines of karma and rebirth, there is a sense of well-being in which a person’s well-being is proportionate to that person’s moral virtue.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (12Mb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/4333 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism Deepak Narang Sawhney Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph. D. University of Warwick Department of Philosophy May 1996 Contents Acknowledgements Declaration Summary Key to Abbreviations and Thesis Outline i Introduction 1 I Consuming the Future 13 H Body without Organs 50 III The Stratification of the World-Economy 79 IV Geopolitics: Antisysternic Movements of Resistance 116 V Palimpsest: Toward a Minor Literature in Monstrosity 152 Concluding Remarks: 174 'Class Consciousness'and 'The American Rhizome' Tables 192 Bibliography 195 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledgeDr. Nick Land for his invaluable support throughout this project, and to my family for their love and patience. Declaration The following is a list of chaptersfrom Axiomatics: The Apparatus of Capitalism that are published in abridged form: Chapter HI: 'The Stratification of the World-Economy', in Must Me Burn Sade?,Deepak N Sawhney (ed) (NJ: Humanities Press, 1997) Chapter IV: 'Geopolitics: Antisystemic Movements of Resistance', in Gilles Deleuze and Minoritarian Becomings,
    [Show full text]
  • A Mimetic Ethics of Bodies
    THE PORNOGRAPHICAL: A MIMETIC ETHICS OF BODIES Holly Mountain This thesis is submitted as a partial requirement towards a Doctorate of Philosophy at the University of Greenwich June 2007 Supervisory Committee Prof. Johnny Golding Dr. Steve Kennedy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is dedicated to my daughter Eva Puddy. I would like to thank Professor Johnny Golding for all of her support, time and energy. I have learnt a lot and none of this would have been possible without you. I would also like to thank Dr. Steve Kennedy for his time and astute comments -he opened a path for the deluge; and my support team during this time of research and writing: James Puddy, my parents, John and Anthea Mountain, my brothers, Nick and David Mountain, Dr. Anne Cormack, Marilyn and Keith Puddy, Andrew Gould, Sarah Purdy, Mark Walker, Andrina Bindon, Marianne Johnson and Morag Cuddeford-Jones. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION The Pornographical............... .......................................... pp. 1 -28. CHAPTER 1 Evacuating the Body: The Abyssal Logic of a Philosophy of Desire, pp. 29 -82. CHAPTER 2 Fascination: The Paradox of a Philosophy of Pleasure ..............pp. 83 -125. CHAPTER 3 Libidinal Technologies of Comic Pleasure...........................pp. 126 -175. CHAPTER 4 Economies of Witnessing: An Ana- aesthetic Mimetics............. pp. 176 - 220. CONCLUSION Privacies and Practices: Virtual Privacy, New Technologies and Democratic Practices....pp. 221 - 236. BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................pp. 237-258. Holly Mountain
    [Show full text]
  • AFFECTIVE TURN’ Marguerite La Caze and Henry Martyn Lloyd
    PARRHESIA NUMBER 13 • 2011 • 1-13 EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION: PHILOSOPHY AND THE ‘AFFECTIVE TURN’ Marguerite La Caze and Henry Martyn Lloyd This special issue of Parrhesia has developed from the 2010 Australasian Society for Continental Philosophy’s Conference at the University of Queensland on the theme of the philosophy of affect. The tradition of philosophies of affect is deep and wide, encompassing both denigration and celebration. For the Stoics, passions such as yearning, spite, grief, and fear were incorrect judgements which were excessive and contrary to reason and nature. However, not all affects were maligned: joy, caution, and goodwill, were to be cultivated. Plato, understanding the affective power of art, banished the poets from the Republic. Yet, famously, he found the origin of philosophy in wonder and the love of wisdom in eros. For Descartes the passions were associated with the animal spirits, with the substantive union of mind and body; if properly trained, they contributed to the good life. For Spinoza all human activity including cognition produces and is produced by affect. His account of the actions and passions of the human mind was crucial to his task of showing the connectedness of humans to nature and the naturalising of moral concepts that resulted from this view. In the ethical life Kant subordinated the affects and passions to reason. In Nietzsche’s hands the denial of passion was rewritten and became a philosophy of affirmation. The philosophical tradition of affect became more focussed in the twentieth century, through the work of philosophers such as Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, Deleuze, Guattari, Irigaray, Foucault, and many others.
    [Show full text]