DOCSLIB.ORG

Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Concept of Happiness in Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies Von der Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften der Universität Duisburg-Essen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) genehmigte Dissertation von Jaison Ambadan Chacko Ambadan aus Areekamala, Kerala, Indien Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ralf Miggelbrink Zweiter Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Markus Tiwald Vorsitzender des Prüfungsausschusses: Prof. Dr. Neil Roughley Tag der Disputation: 02.07.2018 1 Concept of Happiness in Summa Theologiae with Reference to Contemporary Psychological Studies General Introduction 6 Chapter I The Ethical Perspective of Happiness in Aquinas´s Concept of Human Acts Introduction 27 1. Human Acts 31 1.1 Voluntary 52 1.2 Involuntary 53 1.3 Circumstances 54 1.3.1 Nature of Circumstance 55 1.3.2 Role Circumstances in Moral Evaluation 56 1.4 Cognitive Participation 57 1.4.1 Three Acts of the Speculative Intellect 58 1.4.2 Three Acts of the Practical Intellect 60 1.5 The Will 62 1.5.1 Cause of the Movement of the Will 62 1.5.2 Manner in which the Will Moves 63 1.5.3 Characteristics of the Act of the Will 64 1.5.3.1 Enjoyment 65 1.5.3.2 Intention 65 1.5.3.3 Choice 67 1.5.3.4 Counsel 68 1.5.3.5 Consent 68 1.5.3.6 Use 69 1.6 Human Acts Commanded by the Will 70 1.6.1 Good and Evil in Human Acts 71 1.6.2 Goodness and Malice in Human Acts 72 1.6.3 Impact of the Interior Act 75 1.6.4 Impact of the External Act 76 1.6.5 Impact of Disposition 77 Conclusion 79 2 Chapter II Thomas Aquinas´s Cognition of Passion and Happiness Introduction 82 2. Passions 84 2.1 The Meaning of Aquinas´s Account of Passion 85 2.1.1 The Appetitive Power in General 87 2.1.1.1 Passion: A Movement of the Sense Appetite 89 2.1.1.2 Powers of Sensory Apprehension 91 2.1.1.3 The Role of Cogitative Power 93 2.1.1.4 Sensitive versus Natural Appetite 94 2.1.1.5 Sensitive versus Rational Appetite 95 2.1.1.6 The Priority of Good to Evil 96 2.1.2 The Nature of Passion 97 2.1.2.1 Apprehension and Intentionality 99 2.1.2.2 Objects of Passions 101 2.1.2.3 Sensation and Imagination 103 2.1.2.4 Estimative and Memorative Powers 104 2.1.2.5 The Role of the Particular Reason 106 2.2 The Structure of Passions 107 2.2.1 The Concupiscible Passions 108 2.2.1.1 Love as a Passion 109 2.2.1.2 Hatred as a Passion 113 2.2.1.3 Desire as a Passion 115 2.2.1.4 Aversion as a Passion 116 2.2.1.5 Pleasure as a Passion 117 2.2.1.6 Sorrow as a Passion 123 2.2.1.7 Concupiscence as a Passion 126 2.2.1.8 Delight as a Passion 127 2.2.2 The Irascible Passions 128 2.2.2.1 Hope and Despair 129 2.2.2.2 Daring, Fear and Anger 133 2.3 The Passions and Happiness 136 2.3.1 The Spiritual and Animal Side of Human Nature 138 2.3.2 Passion and Temptation 139 2.3.3 Emotion and Discernment 141 Conclusion 142 3 Chapter III The Ethical Perspective of Happiness in Internal and External Principles of Human Act. Introduction 144 3. Ethical Perspective of Human Act 145 3.1 Orientation of Human Act 146 3.1.1 Human Being and Human Action 147 3.1.2 Virtue and Passion 148 3.1.3 Goodness of Human Action 149 3.2 Role of Internal Principles of Human Act 151 3.2.1 Nature of Habitus 151 3.2.2 The Relevance of Formation of Habits 153 3.2.3 Function of Virtue in Human Act 160 3.2.3.1 Role of Theological Virtue 162 3.2.3.1.1 Effect of Faith in Human Act 163 3.2.3.1.2 Impact of Hope in Human Act 165 3.2.3.1.3 Bearing of Charity in Human Act 167 3.2.3.2 The Role of Moral Virtues in Human Act 170 3.2.3.2.1 Influence of Prudence in Human Act 170 3.2.3.2.2 Impact of Justice in Human Act 172 3.2.3.2.3 The Meaning of Fortitude in Human Act 173 3.2.3.2.4 The Meaning of Temperance in Human Act 175 3.2.4 Sin and Vice in General 175 3.2.4.1 Distinctions among Sins 177 3.2.4.2 Causes of Sin 178 3.2.4.3 Consequence of Sin 180 3.3 Role of External Principles of Human Act 182 3.3.1 The Principle of Law 183 3.3.1 Eternal Law 184 3.3.2 Natural Law 185 3.3.3 Human law 187 3.3.4 Divine law 189 3.3.2 Influence of the gifts of the Holy Spirit 190 3.3.2.1 Beatitude and the Fruits 191 3.3.2.2 The Necessity of Grace 193 3.3.2.3 Grace and Human Act 194 Conclusion 196 4 Chapter IV The Psychological Perspective of Happiness Introduction 198 4. Psychology of Happiness 198 4.1 Broad Assessment of Happiness 199 4.1.1 The Meaning of the Word Happiness 204 4.1.2 Influencing factors of Happiness 205 4.1.3 Living Conditions of Happiness 208 4.1.4 Happiness and Wellbeing 209 4.2 Positive Attitude 210 4.2.1 The Scope of Positive Attitude 211 4.2.2 Building Positive Attitudes 212 4.2.2.1 The Resilience Training 213 4.2.2.2 Renewing Strength and Virtue 214 4.2.2.3 Optimism and Pessimism 215 4.2.2.4 Acquiring Optimism 217 4.3 Appreciating the Level of Happiness 217 4.3.1 Pleasure or Pain 218 4.3.2 Desire and Reason 219 4.3.3 The Equilibrium Level of Wellbeing 220 4.3.4 Cognitive Assumption 221 4.3.5 Affective Analysis 222 4.3.6 Transforming Oneself 223 4.4 The Trend of Psychology in Summa 224 4.4.1 The Virtue Theory and Human Habits 225 4.4.2 The Normative Understanding of Nature and Natural Law 226 4.4.3 Flourishing or Eudemonic Happiness 227 4.4.4 Animating Principle of Life 229 4.4.5 Affections of the Will 230 4.4.6 Immateriality and Immortality 231 4.4.7 Thomastic Dualism 232 Conclusion 234 5 Chapter V The Multidimensional Perspective of Perfect Happiness Introduction 236 5 The Nature of Happiness 237 5.1 The Desire for Happiness 238 5.1.1Pleasure Centred 239 5.1.1.1 Stimulus Synchronized 240 5.1.1.2 Wealth Synchronised 241 5.1.1.3 Aridity in Materialistic Pleasure 242 5.1.2 Ego Centred 242 5.1.2.1 Superman Feeling 244 5.1.2.2 Vacillating Ambivalence 244 5.1.2.3 Subjugated Fiasco 244 5.1.3 Charity Centred 245 5.1.3.1 Empathetic Altruism 247 5.1.3.2 Affective Cognition 247 5.1.3.3 Faith and Charity 248 5.1.4 Transcendent 250 5.1.4.1The Transcendent Search for Perfection 251 5.1.4.2 Physical and Intellectual Transcendence 252 5.1.4.3 Transcendent Spiritual Domain 252 5.1.4.4 Contemplative Prayer 253 5.2 Enabling into Happiness 254 5.2.1 Understanding Existential Emptiness 255 5.2.2 Resisting Passivity of Appetite 256 5.2.3 Eliminating Cosmic Loneliness 257 5.2.4 Sublime Relationship 258 5.3 Replacement Therapy 260 5.3.1 Strengthening Kinetic Force 261 5.3.2 The Incompetent Nature of Unhappiness. 262 5.3.3 Knowing Unhappiness 263 5.4 Virtue and Happiness 264 5.4.1 Wellbeing and Happiness 266 5.4.2 Practice of Virtue 268 5.4.3 Active Use of Faculties 271 5.4.4 Mean of Human Act 272 5.5 Contemplation 273 Conclusion 277 General Conclusion 279 Bibliography 285 6 General Introduction Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274)1 is one of the greatest thinkers in Western philosophy and theology. He is even called the angelic Doctor by the Roman Catholic Church. One of his marvelous works is Summa Theologiae which is the primary source of my research to understand the concept of happiness in Summa Theologiae with reference to contemporary psychological studies. Aquinas was a Dominican monk, philosopher, theologian, saint and contemplator, and continues to be important and significant in particular for students of philosophy and theology. Pope Paul VI says that `in order that the students may illumine the mysteries of salvation as completely as possible, they should learn to penetrate them more deeply with the help of speculation, under the guidance of Aquinas, and to perceive their interconnections´2. It is also concern of the church regarding studies in schools and universities that by their very constitution individual subjects be pursued according to their own principles, method, and liberty of scientific inquiry, in a way that an ever deeper understanding in these fields may be obtained and that, as questions that are new and current are raised and investigations carefully made according to the example of the doctors of the Church and especially of Aquinas, so that there may be a deeper realization of the harmony of faith and reason.3 Aquinas constructs a vast system of integrating Greek philosophy with the Christian faith in his masterpiece Summa Theologiae.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Unit 1 Metaphysical Method of Aristotle and Aquinas

    1 Unit 1 Metaphysical Method of Aristotle and Aquinas

    UNIT 1 METAPHYSICAL METHOD OF ARISTOTLE AND AQUINAS Contents 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Aristotelian Method of Metaphysics 1.3 Metaphysical Method of St Thomas Aquinas 1.4 Metaphysics and Epistemology 1.5 Let us Sum up 1.6 Key Words 1.7 Further Readings and References 1.8 Answers to Check Your Progress 1.0 OBJECTIVES Aristotle’s thirst for knowledge pushes him beyond the phenomenal world. He does not just contemplate on them but arrives at them through causes. At the beginning of metaphysics which he called ‘first philosophy’ Aristotle had raised the problem of knowledge and wisdom. Aquinas devoted much of his thought to the question ‘what does it mean to be’? Many Thomists think that his greatest philosophical ability was shown in the area of metaphysics. In this Unit you are expected to understand: • The metaphysical method of Aristotle • The metaphysical method of Aquinas • The inseparable relation between metaphysics and epistemology 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1 The term metaphysics is not of Aristotle, it was of his disciple Andronicus of Rhodes (40 BC) who edited his works. The texts on ‘first philosophy’ were grouped after those of physics and were called meta ta physika. Aristotle defines metaphysics or first philosophy as “a science which investigates being as being”. It is the science that studies being as being. Other sciences touch only a portion of the things. They touch on a particular sphere of being and analyse the attributes of being in that particular sphere. Metaphysics, on the contrary, considers being as such, entity as such in the universal manner and in its highest and most general determinations, thus seeking the ultimate causes.
  • Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Chemistry

    Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Chemistry

    Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Chemistry Jaap van Brakel Abstract: In this paper I assess the relation between philosophy of chemistry and (general) philosophy of science, focusing on those themes in the philoso- phy of chemistry that may bring about major revisions or extensions of cur- rent philosophy of science. Three themes can claim to make a unique contri- bution to philosophy of science: first, the variety of materials in the (natural and artificial) world; second, extending the world by making new stuff; and, third, specific features of the relations between chemistry and physics. Keywords : philosophy of science, philosophy of chemistry, interdiscourse relations, making stuff, variety of substances . 1. Introduction Chemistry is unique and distinguishes itself from all other sciences, with respect to three broad issues: • A (variety of) stuff perspective, requiring conceptual analysis of the notion of stuff or material (Sections 4 and 5). • A making stuff perspective: the transformation of stuff by chemical reaction or phase transition (Section 6). • The pivotal role of the relations between chemistry and physics in connection with the question how everything fits together (Section 7). All themes in the philosophy of chemistry can be classified in one of these three clusters or make contributions to general philosophy of science that, as yet , are not particularly different from similar contributions from other sci- ences (Section 3). I do not exclude the possibility of there being more than three clusters of philosophical issues unique to philosophy of chemistry, but I am not aware of any as yet. Moreover, highlighting the issues discussed in Sections 5-7 does not mean that issues reviewed in Section 3 are less im- portant in revising the philosophy of science.
  • Reason, Desire, and the Will: in Defense of a Tripartite Moral Psychology

    Reason, Desire, and the Will: in Defense of a Tripartite Moral Psychology

    Reason, Desire, and the Will: In Defense of a Tripartite Moral Psychology By Jeremy Carey A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Hannah Ginsborg, Co-Chair Professor R. Jay Wallace, Co-Chair Professor Kinch Hoekstra Summer 2017 Abstract Reason, Desire, and the Will: In Defense of a Tripartite Moral Psychology by Jeremy Carey Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professor R. Jay Wallace, Co-Chair Professor Hannah Ginsborg, Co-Chair Which aspects of our psychology are most central to explaining our intentional actions, and how should we conceive of them in light of their abilities to play those explanatory roles? These are key questions in moral psychology, and my dissertation tries to answer them, or at least to provide a beginning. As with much else in philosophy, the basic contours of this debate first came to us in Plato. Though I am not primarily concerned with the historical details, the initial argument of the dissertation and its distinctive approach reflect these Platonic origins in an interesting way. In Plato’s Protagoras, he presents Socrates as having an intellectualist moral psychology; that is, as claiming that all intentional action is motivated by a belief about what is best. This leads him to argue against the possibility of weakness of will. Plato himself later rejected this view, most notably in the Republic. There he argued that properly accounting for psychological conflict required dividing the soul into three “parts” - rational, spirited, and appetitive.
  • Preface Thomism and the Challenge of Integral Ecology

    Preface Thomism and the Challenge of Integral Ecology

    Preface Thomism and the Challenge of Integral Ecology The late Fr. Richard John Neuhaus said that a “Thomist of the Strict Observance,” was one who believed that the thought of the Angelic Doctor is the intellectual hardware that can run any software. He was thinking, he said, of the Jesuit scholar Norris Clarke, whose phil- osophical work aimed at showing how Thomas Aquinas could make sense even of the process philosophers Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne. At Fordham University my then-girlfriend Cathy (now my wife) would take me to lunch with Father Clarke, then in his late eighties, a spry gnome-like character who would re- gale us with his intellectual adventures of bringing St. Thomas to every conceivable endeavor. Upon his mentioning a lunch date with the Dalai Lama, I asked him what he had said. Father Clarke looked at us and said very seriously, “I told him, ‘You have wonderful medi- tative practices, but your metaphysics are terrible!’” The Thomist of the Strict Observance then attempted, well, to enlighten him. I’m not sure I agreed with everything Father Clarke said about metaphysics or Thomas Aquinas, but that impulse to bring Thomism to bear on intellectual projects and problems out there in the world was remarkable to me. The tribe of old-fashioned Thomists is often logos 21:4 fall 2018 6 logos fiercely protective of their master in such a way as to ward off any- body attempting to bring him out of the thirteenth, the greatest of centuries, and into our own milieu. I do not doubt the intellectual seriousness, the learning, or the rigor of their work.
  • Kant's Critique of Judgment and the Scientific Investigation of Matter

    Kant's Critique of Judgment and the Scientific Investigation of Matter

    Kant’s Critique of Judgment and the Scientific Investigation of Matter Daniel Rothbart, Irmgard Scherer Abstract: Kant’s theory of judgment establishes the conceptual framework for understanding the subtle relationships between the experimental scientist, the modern instrument, and nature’s atomic particles. The principle of purposive- ness which governs judgment has also a role in implicitly guiding modern experimental science. In Part 1 we explore Kant’s philosophy of science as he shows how knowledge of material nature and unobservable entities is possible. In Part 2 we examine the way in which Kant’s treatment of judgment, with its operating principle of purposiveness, enters into his critical project and under- lies the possibility of rational science. In Part 3 we show that the centrality given to judgment in Kant’s conception of science provides philosophical in- sight into the investigation of atomic substances in modern chemistry. Keywords : Kant , judgment , purposiveness , experimentation , investigation of matter . Introduction Kant’s philosophy of science centers on the problem of how it is possible to acquire genuine knowledge of unobservable entities, such as atoms and molecules. “What and how much can the understanding and reason know apart from all experience?” ( CPuR , Axvii). This raises the question of the role of experiments in the knowability ( Erkennbarkeit ) and the experientiality (Erfahrbarkeit ) of nature. Kant’s insights into the character of scientific experimentation are not given the hearing they deserve. We argue that Kant’s theory of judgment establishes the conceptual framework for understanding the subtle inter- actions between the experimental chemist, the modern chemical instrument, and molecular substance.
  • Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S

    Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S

    Roger Williams University DOCS@RWU School of Architecture, Art, and Historic School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications Preservation 2015 Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John S. Hendrix Roger Williams University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp Part of the Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Hendrix, John S., "Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination" (2015). School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications. Paper 31. http://docs.rwu.edu/saahp_fp/31 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Plotinus and the Artistic Imagination John Hendrix In the thought of Plotinus, the imagination is responsible for the apprehen- sion of the activity of Intellect. If creativity in the arts involves an exercise of the imagination, the image-making power that links sense perception to noet- ic thought and the nous poietikos , the poetic or creative intellect, then the arts exercise the apprehension of intellectual activity and unconscious thought. According to John Dillon in “Plotinus and the Transcendental Imag- ination,” 1 Plotinus’ conception of the imagination led to the formulation of the imagination as a basis of artistic creativity. In Plotinus, imagination operates on several different levels: it produces images in sense perception, it synthesizes images in dianoetic thought, and it produces images in correspondence with the articulation through logos of noetic thought.
  • A Feminist Departure from Kant and Hegel

    A Feminist Departure from Kant and Hegel

    Performing the Speculative: A Feminist Departure from Kant and Hegel Isabell DAHMS September 2019 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy, Kingston University London for the award of Doctor of Philosophy. Abstract This thesis defines the philosophical concept of speculation and assesses its emergence in Kantian and post-Kantian German philosophy, in the attempted construction of a post-Enlightenment “scientific” philosophy and alongside early work in anthropology and gynaecology. It argues that in the historical elaboration of the problem of speculation “race” and “sex” emerge as concerns for this newly defined scientific philosophy. Moreover, a concept of performativity is introduced in the attempt to think the ontological implications or “effects” of speculative thought. This thesis proposes that Hegel is the originator of such a concept of performativity, introduced as the conclusion to the Science of Logic. Here, performativity is defined as activity of form or determinate being in contrast to the empty notion of being pure being with which the Logic begins. Speculation, the Logic proposes, is not only a methodological necessity giving rise to an essentially epistemological problem, as Kant had defined it, but is also to be thought as ontological Thätigkeit (activity) proper. Rewriting speculation as an ontological concept of form, Hegel uses, among others, social and political examples to illustrate the nature of speculative thought. The surprising appearance of the state and the sexual relation in the Logic, alongside the concepts of violence, resistance, power and freedom, demonstrates that speculative (theoretical and non-empirical) reason necessarily encounters political categories and suggests that these might be exemplary of its nature.
  • Pontifical John Paul Ii Institute for Studies on Marriage & Family

    Pontifical John Paul Ii Institute for Studies on Marriage & Family

    PONTIFICAL JOHN PAUL II INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES ON MARRIAGE & FAMILY at The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. ACADEMIC CATALOG 2011 - 2013 © Copyright 2011 Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family at The Catholic University of America Cover photo by Tony Fiorini/CUA 2JOHN PAUL II I NSTITUTE TABLE OF CONTENTS MISSION STATEMENT 4 DEGREE PROGRAMS 20 The Master of Theological Studies NATURE AND PURPOSE in Marriage and Family OF THE INSTITUTE 5 (M.T.S.) 20 The Master of Theological Studies GENERAL INFORMATION 8 in Biotechnology and Ethics 2011-12 A CADEMIC CALENDAR 10 (M.T.S.) 22 The Licentiate in Sacred Theology STUDENT LIFE 11 of Marriage and Family Facilities 11 (S.T.L.) 24 Brookland/CUA Area 11 Housing Options 11 The Doctorate in Sacred Theology Meals 12 with a Specialization in Medical Insurance 12 Marriage and Family (S.T.D.) 27 Student Identification Cards 12 The Doctorate in Theology with Liturgical Life 12 a Specialization in Person, Dress Code 13 Marriage, and Family (Ph.D.) 29 Cultural Events 13 Transportation 13 COURSES OF INSTRUCTION 32 Parking 14 FACULTY 52 Inclement Weather 14 Post Office 14 THE MCGIVNEY LECTURE SERIES 57 Student Grievances 14 DISTINGUISHED LECTURERS 57 Career and Placement Services 14 GOVERNANCE & A DMINISTRATION 58 ADMISSIONS AND FINANCIAL AID 15 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 59 TUITION AND FEES 15 APOSTOLIC CONSTITUTION ACADEMIC INFORMATION 16 MAGNUM MATRIMONII SACRAMENTUM 62 Registration 16 Academic Advising 16 PAPAL ADDRESS TO THE FACULTY OF Classification of Students 16 Auditing
  • Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection

    Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Spring 2010 Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Jason Skirry University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the History of Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Skirry, Jason, "Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection" (2010). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 179. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/179 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Malebranche's Augustinianism and the Mind's Perfection Abstract This dissertation presents a unified interpretation of Malebranche’s philosophical system that is based on his Augustinian theory of the mind’s perfection, which consists in maximizing the mind’s ability to successfully access, comprehend, and follow God’s Order through practices that purify and cognitively enhance the mind’s attention. I argue that the mind’s perfection figures centrally in Malebranche’s philosophy and is the main hub that connects and reconciles the three fundamental principles of his system, namely, his occasionalism, divine illumination, and freedom. To demonstrate this, I first present, in chapter one, Malebranche’s philosophy within the historical and intellectual context of his membership in the French Oratory, arguing that the Oratory’s particular brand of Augustinianism, initiated by Cardinal Bérulle and propagated by Oratorians such as Andre Martin, is at the core of his philosophy and informs his theory of perfection. Next, in chapter two, I explicate Augustine’s own theory of perfection in order to provide an outline, and a basis of comparison, for Malebranche’s own theory of perfection.
  • On the Experience of Encountering Art in Museum Spaces: an Inquiry with Gilles Deleuze's Concepts of Desire and Assemblage

    On the Experience of Encountering Art in Museum Spaces: an Inquiry with Gilles Deleuze's Concepts of Desire and Assemblage

    ON THE EXPERIENCE OF ENCOUNTERING ART IN MUSEUM SPACES: AN INQUIRY WITH GILLES DELEUZE'S CONCEPTS OF DESIRE AND ASSEMBLAGE by Marie-France Berard B.A., The University of Montreal, 1992 M.A., The University of Montreal, 2004 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Curriculum Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) November 2017 © Marie-France Berard, 2017 ABSTRACT Framed by the theoretical concepts of assemblage and desire from philosopher Gilles Deleuze, and his collaborative writings with psychoanalyst Félix Guattari (Deleuze and Guattari, 1983, 1987), this study inquires into the qualities and productive potential of the art encounter in a gallery setting. The study brings together my practice in the field of art museum education, and my interest in the art encounter to inquire what the art encounter does. Thinking with Deleuzian concepts enacts a view of the art encounter as a milieu of experimentation where affects move a body to create assemblages, connections with things, human and non-human bodies, expressions, qualities, ideas, spaces. Assemblages allow desire (as a force) to circulate; desiring-assemblages move bodies to produce connections with other human or non-human entities, thoughts, they produce subjectivation as a mode of existence. For Deleuze, one does not 'have' an experience of an artwork or exhibition detached against the background of life; experience is a milieu which contributes to actually making life. My study inquires how working within a philosophy conceived in terms of relationality, connections, flows and multiplicity (rather than fixed identities) enact a view of the art encounter as a milieu of immanent ethics.
  • ABSTRACT the Conversion and Therapy of Desire in Augustine's

    ABSTRACT the Conversion and Therapy of Desire in Augustine's

    ABSTRACT The Conversion and Therapy of Desire in Augustine’s Cassiciacum Dialogues Mark J. Boone, Ph.D. Directors: Thomas S. Hibbs, Ph.D., and Michael P. Foley, Ph.D. The philosophical schools of late antiquity commonly diagnosed human unhappiness as rooted in some fundamental disorder in our desires, and offered various therapies or prescriptions for the healing of desire. Among these only the neo-Platonic treatment for desire requires redirecting desire towards an immaterial world. Although Augustine agrees with the neo-Platonists on the need to redirect our desires to an immaterial world, he does not adopt their therapy for desire. Instead he adopts a thoroughly Christian approach to the healing of desire. The conversion of desire results from the Trinitarian God’s gracious actions taken to heal our desires. Augustine does not recommend fleeing from the influence of the body, as neo-Platonism encourages, but fleeing to Christ, immersing ourselves in the life of the Church, and practicing the theological virtues. In this dissertation I examine Augustine’s Cassiciacum dialogues. In Contra Academicos (Against the Academics), Augustine argues that we must vigorously desire wisdom in order to attain it; that we must have hope in the possibility of attaining wisdom; and that our desire for wisdom must be bound in faith to Christ. In De beata vita (On the Happy Life), Augustine argues that the Trinitarian God is the only perennially satisfying object of desire and shows that the pursuit of God is the activity of a prayerful community of believers who are practicing faith, hope, and charity. In De ordine (On Order), Augustine recommends that the reordering of our desires be pursued through a liberal arts education and through Christian morals.
  • L'abecedaire De Gilles Deleuze, Avec Claire Parnet

    L'abecedaire De Gilles Deleuze, Avec Claire Parnet

    1 L'Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze, avec Claire Parnet Directed by Pierre-André Boutang (1996) Translation & Notes: Charles J. Stivale Credits (shown at the end of each tape): Conversation: Claire Parnet Direction: Pierre-André Boutang, Michel Pamart Image: Alain Thiollet Sound: Jean Maini Editing: Nedjma Scialom Sound Mix: Vianney Aubé, Rémi Stengel Images from Vincennes: Marielle Burkhalter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Translated and edited by Charles J. Stivale --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prelude \1 A short description of the trailer and then of the interview "set" is quite useful: the black and white trailer over which the title, then the director’s credit are shown, depicts Deleuze lecturing to a crowded, smoky seminar, his voice barely audible over the musical accompaniment. The subtitle, “Université de Vincennes, 1980,” appears briefly at the lower right, and Deleuze’s desk is packed with tape recorders. A second shot is a close-up of Deleuze chatting with the students seated closest to him. Then another shot shows students in the seminar listening intently, most of them (including a young Claire Parnet in profile) smoking cigarettes. The final shot again shows Deleuze lecturing from his desk at the front of the seminar room, gesticulating as he speaks. The final gesture shows him placing his hand over his chin in a freeze-frame, punctuating the point he has just made. As for the setting in Deleuze’s apartment during the interview, the viewer sees Deleuze seated in front of a sideboard over which hangs a mirror, and opposite him sits Parnet, smoking constantly throughout. On the dresser to the right of the mirror is his trademark hat perched on a hook.