Method Behind the Madness 6/ t"!" t h..!has heenbeen sad,"sad " writes Soviet "I believe intruth andthe power of in 1947 and attributed tto 'X.'" It is a ideas to convey the truth," says Go suggestion he made again the following I defector Anatoliy Golitsyn in year in his lengthy analysis memoran M the foreword to his new book, litsyn, and he expresses the hope that his I "wtTto bookwillhelp the people of theWestto dum of March 1989. The PerestroikaDeception, "to observe To those familiar with Foreign Af the jubilation of American and West see the dangers before them "and to re fairs, it is not surprising that the defec European conservatives who have been cover from their blindness." If it is within the power of a book to do that, tor's innocent request went unrequited. cheering '' without realizing As the flagship journal of the wodd- that it is intended to bring about their then there is certainly none better than govemment-promoting Council on For own political and physical demise. Lib his for that daunting task. eign Relations (CFR), it has been the eral support for 'perestroika' is under No one better apprehends or more clearly explains the dialectic, the plan leading promoter of perestroika, glas- standable, but conservative support nost, and convergence in the West for cameas a surprise to me." ning framework, and the operational methods of the Communist deception decades. Time magazine hascalled For For one who studied and worked strategy than Golitsyn. We emphasize eign Affairs "the most influential peri within the inner sanctum of Soviet in odical in print." Unformnately, Aat is telligence and who risked his life to Communist because there apparently is a vital dimension of the deception strat- an apt description. As the mouthpiece of warn the West about the Kremlin's pro 0gy which has eluded his otherwise ex the powerful CFR, it not only speaks to gram of strategic deception, it must be and for America's "ruling establish sad indeed, and maddening, to witness cellent grasp ofthis entire subject. An example of this gap in under ment," but, to an incredibly shameful the rush to destruction. "I was ap standing we are referring to can be degree, frames the issues and dictates palled," he says, "that 'perestroika' was the bounds of acceptabledebateon eco embraced and supported by the United found inGolitsyn's secret memorandum to the CIA of January 4, 1988, which nomic and foreign policy matters in this States without any serious debate onthe comprises one of the chapters in The supposedly free republic. subject." Perestroika Deception. ^ After brilliantly exposing The Game Plan In his groundbreaking 1984 book. the treachery and disin- formation involved in Gor- New Lies for Old, Golitsyn laid out, in bachev's visit to the United meticulous detail and with devastating clarity, the diabolical nature ofthe com States, Golitsyn suggested ing perestroika offensive —which he had eight actions the CIA learned about in his capacity as an elite should take to counteract KGB officer 25 years earlier! The strat the perestroika offensive. J|H egy called for ongoing deception opera Number eight reads: "In- tions of fantastic scope which would so vite the National Security gull and disarm the West that itwould Council to consider hav- ^ eventually "converge" with the "re ing this assessment pub- K formed" Communist regimes in a world lished in Foreign Affairs ^ government. through its editor, Mr. "In 1984 I thought that, in the event; William Hyland, under of Westernresistanceto Soviet strategy,, the anonymous cover of ^ ^ the scenario of convergence betweenI 'a KGB defector' along ^ K the two systems might take the next halff the same lines as the ar- g Bil century to unroll," he says in his new/ tide by Ambassador Ken- H B| work. "Now, however, because thej nan which was published West has committed itself to u the support of 'perestroika' and because of the impact of the misguided and euphoric support for it in the Western • ||:i| media, convergence might take less than a decade. The sword of Damocles is hang- ingovertheWestern democ- CFR's Harold Pratt House: Headquarters of an racies, yet they are oblivious BWll "invisible government" In the .

the NEW AMERICAN / SEPTEMBER 18. 1995 lions more, the CFR policy makers de U.S. forces in itsglobal "peacekeeping" Five ofthe sixmembers ofthe Reagan operations. Administration's National Security vised one excuse after anothertojustify the suicidal and unconscionable trans Council to which Golitsyn referred were "Rediscovering" Karl Marx fers of credit, technology, and other as (or had been) CFR members —George sistance which allowed these bankrupt But an even more telling and alarm Bush, Alexander Haig, Caspar Weinber- regimes tocontinue their tyrannical op ing message is to be found in an article aer, David Jones, and William Casey — pression. And Foreign Ajfairs has been by historian (CFR), us was Foreign AJfairs editor William past president ofthe Society for Histo Hyland, aformer aide to Henry Kissin the leading organ that has "sold these treacheries to Congress and the Ameri rians of American Foreign Relations, in ger (CFR), another leading perestroika the same issue of Foreign Ajfairs. En apostle. So was George F. Kennan, au can public. A recent case in point was an article titled "The Tragedy of His thor ofthe celebrated "X" article which tory," the Gaddis essay commences launched Truman's phony "contain by Paul D. Wolfowitz (CFR), former ambassador and Defense Undersec with a paean to Marxist historian Will ment" policy. As were some 200 addi iam Appleman Williams and asks rhe tional key members of the Reagan retary, and now dean of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International torically, "what was the Cold War all Administration, including virtually all about?" His answer is interesting and ofhis top State Department officials. Studies at Johns Hopkins University, in significant, in that it reflects

Invisible Government dom: "Given what we know of Indeed, CFR members have the 's internal fra so dominated every Adminis- gility ... given persuasive evi tration — whether Democrat IthedenceregnantthatEstablishmentan internationalwis orRepublican —from FDR up communist monolith never re tothe present that the CFR has ally existed; given all of these often justly been called our things, what exactly was the "invisible government." The HjHH threat to American interests CFR has played a central role anyway?" in some of the most disastrous Hgg Reading Gaddis one is not decisions and policies that sure. Notingthat Stalinwas not have aided totalitarian Com- |^B||| "a normal, everyday, run-of- munism and threatened the the-mill statesmanlike head of Free World's security. A short government" and that his list of someof the most signifi- crimes were "horrifying" — an cantofthose policies and deci- < amazing discovery that "liber- sions would include: I als" worldwide have recently • President Roosevelt's dip- I stumbled upon —Gaddis criti- loinatic recognition of the So- I cizes those who failed to see viet Union in 1933. I the evil in Stalin, Mao and the • Launching of the U.S. Ex- I "brutal romantics" who were port-Import Bank in 1934 to 5t" their "clones": "Kim II Sung, help facilitate trade with the GGorbachev: Still a "convincedCommunist: Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot, Fidel USSR. the January/February 1994 Foreign A/- Castro, Mengistu Haile-Miriam, Babrak • U.S. Lend-Lease aid to save the " Karmal, and many others." USSR from the Nazis and make her a fairs entitled "Clinton's First Year." "President CHntonwas right, of course, "History for a long time was on their world power. it side, and then it ceased to be " says • "Losing" China to the Communists to backPresident Yeltsin strongly in last fall's crisis," wrote Wolfowitz. "Theree Gaddis. "We need to understand why." b)' our support for Mao and our under e And where shall weturnfor this under- mining of Chiang Kai-shek. was no alternative to Yeltsinat the time : that offered any hope for the success of)f standing? Why, to Marx, of course. • President Eisenhower's bridge ;s Mind you, Gaddis isnot suggesting that building" aid to the Soviets in the; democracy inRussia. TheUnited States has a huge stake in that success and inn we study Marx to better understand the 1950s. ,y pernicious doctrines that drive the totali- • PresidentJohnson's "peacefulcoex- the continuation of Russia's generally moderate foreign policy." Moreover,r, tarian ideologies and policies ofour col- istence" in the '60s. i said Wolfowitz, "The end of the ColdId lectivist foes. Not at all. Rather, this • President Nixon's "detente and rh CFR luminary suggests we "follow an- Jimmy Carter's "human rights in the5 War has made cooperative action through the United Nations newly feasible in other piece of advice from William 19-Os. of Appleman Williams, which is that we • The Reagan-Bush concepts off many cases by eliminating the threat of rediscover Karl Marx." Gaddis explains: "linkage" and "engagement" in thee a Soviet veto...." The message is clear: Keep the aid 1980s. It was Marx, more than anyone Decade after decade, as Communist}t spigot flowing to our comrades in Mos- it cow and step up the program to "em- else, who alerted us to the fact that regimes were racking up a body count there are long-term "substructural of over 100 million and enslaving bil-l- power" the UN and further entangle

the NEW AMERICAN / SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 "consensus-building process" to address forces in history, and that they It's useless to deny the enormous and shape modes of economic produc unique contribution of Marx, Engels the "major themes of today's complex and Leninto the history of socialthought and interdependent world." tion, forms of political organization, Stripped ofitsAesopian dialectic, the and even social consciousness.... and to modem civilization as a whole." • "Theconcept, the main idea, lies in conference is a thinly veiled call for We have neglected Marx's ap convergence and world government. proach to history.... the fact that we want to give a new lease Marx, it seems, had mixed up on life to through perestroika But don't take our word on that; take linear with cyclical processes in and to reveal the potentialof the social the word of Jim Garrison, the Gor history, and that was a substantial ist system...." bachev Foundation's executive director. error indeed. But it does not invali • "I am a communist, a convinced In a lengthy and highly illuminating cover article ("One World Under Gor- date his larger insight into the ex communist. For some that may be a fan istence of tectonic forces and the tasy. Butformeit is my main goal." by") inthe May 31st - June 6th issue of • 'Today wehave perestroika, thesal SF Weekly, a liberal-left San Francisco role they play in human affairs. newspaper. Garrison spills the beans. That insight might well serve as a vation of socialism, giving it a second starting point for a reconsidera breath, revealing everything good which "Over the next 20 to 30 years, we are tion, notjust of the Cold War, but is in this system." going to end up with world govern-, ofthe twentieth century asa whole. • "We are carrying forth a Marxism- ment," he says. "It's inevitable." Heex [Emphasis added.] Leninism freed from layers of dog pands: "What's happening right now as matism, staleness and short-sighted you break down the Cold War, what is To longtime followers of the CFR's considerations." emerging now is ethnic identities. You "party line," this ringing endorsement of Gorbachev's own words and deeds are going to see more Yugoslavias, abundantly confirm to any sentient be more Somalias, more Rwandas, more Marx coming from the hallowed halls of [Timothy] McVeighs and more nerve- Pratt House is not surprising. It was the ingexactly what Anatoliy Golitsyn has founder of the Council, Colonel Edward said: Gorbachev is no "liberal," no re gas attacks. But inandthrough this tur bulence is the recognition that we have MandellHouse, after all, who called for former. He is a dedicated Marxist- Leninist carrying out the Communist toempower the United Nations andthat "socialismas dreamedof by KarlMarx." we have to govern and regulate human What we are witnessing now is the long-range strategy of convergence. In "convergence" of East and West at the hisrecent essay, "New Priorities forthe interaction..." (Emphasis added.) ruling elite level, in preparation for to World," he declares "it is increasingly Of course, the invitees to this "five tal convergence in the nearfuture. clear that the ideological foundations of days of round tables and global mind- the Western world are becoming out meld" arethetypes who wield sufficient power and influence to cause or exag A Convinced Communist dated." Note that it is the ideological Consider, for example, Gorbachev's foundations ofthe Western world — not gerate the "turbulence" necessary tojus the Marxist world — which are "be tify "world government" through an "Churchill" speech of May 6, 1992 in "empowered" United Nations. Fulton, Missouri, wherein he calledfor coming outdated." "global government" under the United Co-chairing this forum with Gor "Global Brain Trust" bachev are: Askar Akayev, president of Nations; it readsas if it wereliftedfrom Kyrgyzstan and "former" Con^unist the pages of Foreign Affairs (which it Odd, it might seemthen, thatthisun probably was). Consider also the fol reconstructed Communist with oily Party leader; Oscar Arias, president of lowing statements of Mikhail Gor charm would be anointed by the CFR Costa Rica; Tansu Ciller, prime minis bachev, former General Secretary of the Establishment to lead a "global brain ter of Turkey; former U.S. Secretaries Communist Party and"President" of the trust"in a spectacular star-studded sum of State James A. Baker and George mit witheminentcapitalists to shapethe Shultz; Maurice Strong, billionaire in Soviet Union, taken from his speeches dustrialist and chairman of the Earth and his book, Perestroika. These cer "commonfuture"of theplanet.Butonly tainly are well known to the "best and odd to those unfamiliar with the conver Council; media mega-magnate Ted the brightest," the CFR "wise men"; yet gence game plan. Turner; and Desmond Tutu, every ter-" they have either hidden them or have 'The State ofthe World Forum," says rorist's favorite archbishop. explained them away because they do the propaganda release for the Gor Among tiie 350 luminaries from 48 bachev Foundationextravaganzaset for countries expected tograce this rarefied not comport with the false images of firmament are: George Bush and Mar Gorbachev, Russia, and "perestroika" September 27 - October 1,1995 inSan Francisco, "is the launching of a multi- garet Thatcher; Worldwatch president now being foisted on the American Lester Brown; New Age gurus Fritjof public: year initiative —acitizen's global brain trust." This gatiiering of theaugust will Capra, Willis Harman, Deepak Chopra, • "In October 1917, we parted with RobertMuUer, and Matthew Fox; ANC theOldWorld, rejecting it once andfor launch "a multi-year process, culminat ing in the year 2000, to articulate tiie terrorist Thabo Mbeki; Microsoft wiz all. We aremoving toward a new world, ard Bill Gates; media mogul Rupert the world of . We shall fundamental priorities, values and ac tions necessary to constructively shape Murdoch; futurists Alvin Toffler and never turn off that road." John Naisbitt; Archer Daniels Midland • "We will proceed toward betterso our conmion future." This humble and unprepossessing convocation, entitled CEO Dwayne Andreas; Esalen founder cialism rather than away from it." Michael Murphy; motivation superstar • "I am now [June 1990], just as I' ve 'Toward a New Civilization:Launching always been, a convinced communist. a Global Initiative," will utilize the Tony Robbins; A1 Gore, Ralph Nader, THE NEW AMERICAN / SEPTEMBER 18. 1995 42 Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carl Sagan, John uphis own American-style presidential so to alter our life in the United Denver, Vaclav Havel, Theodore Hes- library with a goal of $74 million in States that we can be comfortably burgh, Timothy Wirth, Max Kampel- donations." merged withtheSovietUnion. " 'I found him to be exuberant and man, and Alan Cranston. Dodd was understandably shocked Heady atmosphere; one could get highly animated, just brimming with dizzy. But why waste time with riffraff, ideas,' said David Rockefeller, Jr., and asked Gaither if he would repeat chairman of the Rockefeller Brothers that statement under oath before the right? "I have always enjoyed people committee in Washington. To which who are influential leaders as opposed Fund, afterthehour-long meeting which was held at the Waldorf Astoria. The Gaither replied, "This we would not to people who are followers," Garrison thinkof doing." Within months theCFR candidly confided to SF Weekly, "I foundations included those established by the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Mellon, "wise men" had exercised their consid naturally gravitate towards higher parts erable muscle within the Congress and of the pyramid rather than the lower Ford and Pew families...." parts." Naturally. Which is why the glo- Which brings us to a very important the investigative cortimittee was soon part of the perestroika/convergence terminated. And the foundations have balist, draft-dodging, radical anti-nuke continued — and have expanded,diver activist Garrison is probably the perfect storyfirst revealed nearly 45 yearsago. pick to direct the Gorbachev Founda In 1952, the U.S. House of Representa sified, and accelerated — their subver tion/USA. Directing the Moscow head tives established a formal committee to sive activities to this day. quarters of the foundation is Georgiy investigate the activities of several of Shakhnazarov, who played an important thelarge tax-exempt foundations which A Larger Conspiracy In 1966 Robert Welch, the founder of role in the leadership of the Central had become notorious for providing funds to individuals and organizations the , published an es- Committee of the Communist Party of sayentitled The Truthin the Soviet Union and is , Time. In it, he stated that president of the Russian "the Communist move Association of Political "... we shall use our grant'tnaking ment is only a tool of Sciences. power so to alter our life In the United the total conspiracy." So what does Gorby And he pointed to New envision? A top priority, States that we can be comfortably York and Washington as he says,is "the adoption merged with the Soviet Unlonu" the real seat of the con- by the United Nations spiracy's power, apply- and the national govern- — inga reliable rule; If you ments of a Code of In want to know who the boss is, see who ternational Environmental Law." identified with Communism and social "Creating non-governmental commis ism.It may be recalled thatAlger Hiss, signsthe check. It wasWestern money, the notorious Sovietspy,hadbeengiven especially funds taken from American sions of 'wise men' to considerthe role taxpayers, that was keeping Commu of mass media" and"developing a globd a plush jobaspresident ofthe powerful consciousness" arealsoimportant priori- Carnegie Endowment in 1948. He had nism alive and enabling it to dominate been chosen for that position by the scores of nations. And it was that larger ues.To this end, "World politicsshould conspiracy above Communism which embrace the task of spiritual renewal." Endowment's chairman John Foster had a death grip on our own government How? Comrade Gorbachev would "set Dulles, a founder of the CFR and pro- teg6 ofthe Marxist Colonel House. Like and on many of America's institutions up a kind ofUnited Nations Council of (media, foundations, academia, etc.). Elders, comprising the most highly re many others in the CFR cabal, Dulles cultivated an anti-Communist reputa Others werebeginning to see through spected scholars and public leaders." the deception too. In hisbook. The Na And like his "wise men" commissions, tionwith cheap rhetoric thatcompletely belied his actions. ked Capitalist, former FBI official and this "Council of Elders" would, no police chief W. Cleon Skousen re doubt, closely resemble the globalist In 1953,the committee's top investi ideological complexion represented at gator,gaior, Normani-'JUimoil Dodd,JL/uuu, waswaa invited111 tothe counted a conversation. ,,, he hadi.* withi. i Dr.i his San Francisco Summit. headquarters of the Ford Bella Dodd, who had been a high-level FoundationT-. u.,by the foundation's nrAci-presi membermpmhpr ofnf the U.S. Communist Party. "I tiiink the Communist conspiracy is Foundation Funding dent, H. Rowan Gaither. Atthatmeeting, Gaither brazenly told merely a branch of a much bigger con And how does a poor, unemployed spiracy!" she told him. Dr. Dodd ex Soviet apparatchik like Gorbachev come Norman Dodd that he and others in the philanthropic field who had worked for plained that she first became aware of up with the wherewithal to run a trans some mysterious superleadership right continental foundation and throwtnrow a con- theme Stateoiaic Department anda.i« otherutuwi federal ^,x ' fabulationtabulationof otsuch sucn magnuuac.magnitude? Thelu agencies5 had for years operatedpmanfltinaunder a aftermunistWorldPartvWar hadHdifficultywhen the U.S.gettingComin- carefully thought-out plan emanating munist Party had difficulty getting in first step involved a visit to some other structions fromMoscowon severalvital foundations. re from the White House. As related by Dodd, here is how Gaither put it: matters requiring immediate attention. ported on May 13, 1992: "Mikhail S. The American Communist hierarchy Gorbachev met yesterday in wastoldthatanytimethey hadanemer with leaders of some of the nation's The substance of them [directives from the White House] is that we gency of this kind they should contact most richly endowed private founda any one of three designated persons at tions, enlisting their support in setting shall use our grant-maJdng power

43 the newAMERICAN / SEPTEMBER 18. 1995 the Waldorf Towers. According to Dr. pletely adequate analogy, it provides a continues, "is the considerable involve Dodd, whenever the Party obtained in helpful frame throughwhich to view the ment ofjournalists and other media fig structions from any of these three men, criminal and amoral actions of the In ures, who account for more than 10 Moscow always ratified them. sider globalist elites and their Soviet percent of the membership." He men "What puzzled Dr. Dodd," Skousen collaborators. tions the CFR's new president, Leslie records, "was that not one of these three Obviously these conspirators, like all Gelb, who "for many years was a re contacts was a Russian. Nor were any of criminals,strongly prefer that their dark porter and columnist for the New York them Communists. In fact, all three deeds not be exposed tothe light ofpub Times," and "Strobe Talbott of Time wereextremely wealthy Americancapi lic scrutiny. magazine, who is now President Clin talists." "I would certainly like to find Which is why Foreign Affairs will ton's ambassador at large in the Slavic out who is really running things," said never publish Anatoliy Golitsyn's ex world." Dr. Dodd. Many others would like to pose; the perestroika deception is their The CFR stranglehold is astonishing: know also. Buttheconcept of super-rich confidence game as well as the Krem "The editorial page editor, deputy edi capitalists and Communist dictators and lin's. So too, it goes with the rest of the torial page editor, executive editor, revolutionaries — supposed arch-en- major media, which has been brought managing editor, foreign editor, na- emies — collaborating in schemes for global conquest seems to H many people so totally incongru- H financial editor and various writ ous as to defy belief. Yet the proof H ers as well as Katharine Graham, is overwhelming. H thepaper'sprincipal owner, repre The Armand Hammer docu- H Itionalsent Theaffairs Washingtoneditor, business Post inand the ments recently released from the H council's membership," observes Soviet archives, for example, con- H Harwood. Ditto, he notes, for the firm what this magazine had re- other media giants: the New York ported years ago: That the |H Times, Wall Street Journal, Los billionaire "capitalist" had been a H Angeles Times, NBC, CBS, ABC, Soviet agent for decades and had ^9 et al. Most revealing was this ad helped finance the Communist H mission: "They do not merely Party. But others even more H analyze and interpret foreign wealthy and more powerful had policy for the United States; they help make it." preceded him. The late Professor The CFR notonly promulgates Carroll Quigley, in a section of his its globalist treachery through its monumental history. Tragedy and Hope, writes concerning "the journal, books and conferences, links between Wall Street and the BS and its influence in the CFR-run media, but it conducts a veritable Left, especially the Communists." "Here the chief link," says Quig- shuttle service between New York, ley, "was the Thomas W. Lament Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and family." Quigley calls Lamont, a Robert Welch explained that the "Communist other Communistcapitalsto coor- partner of J.P. Morgan, "the most movementIs onlya tool of the total conspiracy.",y " dinate the convergence strategy. Golitsyn noted one of these influential man in Wall Street," andid within the CFR orbit over the past few meetingsmi in his The Perestroika Decep notes that government files "show Tom m decades. In a rare example of candor, tion:tic "During his recent visit to Mos Lamont, his wife Flora, and his son)n 's Richard Har-cow, co [Zbigniew] Brzezinski, the former Corliss as sponsors and financial angels:Is wood, in his column of October 30, Nj to almost a score of extreme Left orga National Security Adviser in the Carter a- 1994, entitled "Ruling Class Journal- AiAdministration, met leading Soviet nizations, including the CommunistSt ists," revealed the extent of the CFR str Party itself."Otherexamples abound. strategists, including Yakovlev. an ex lockup on the media. Harwood admitted pertpe on the manipulation of the Western Onewaytoexplainthis apparent conn- that CFR members "are the nearest media,m« and advised them onhow topro tradiction is to reduce the shared moti:i- thing we have to a ruling establish- ceedcei with 'perestroika.' Furthermore, vation of these seeming enemies to the le ment in the United States," and that in BrBrzezinski delivered a lecture on the simplest of terms: lust for power. We^e the CFR's circles of power "journalists samesai subject to the Sovietdiplomats at see this same motive force — augI- get cheek and jowl with the establish- theHigh Diplomatic Academy!" mented with greed and political ambi - ment." But Brzezinski (CFR) is no mere tion — at work in other conspiraciess "The president is a member," Har- "dupe.""di Hefully understands the decep involving "arch-enemies." As, for ex wood notes. "Sois hissecretary of state, tiotion in which he is taking part. As do ample, in Colombia, Panama, Mexico 0 the deputy secretary of state, all five ofmany ma of his globalist CFR collabora — or our own country, for that matter r the undersecretaries...." And on and on tortors. We are not confronted here with — where the top law enforcement offi - he goes, through a litany of the CFRmere me stupidity; we are faced with trea cials turn out to be co-conspirators withh membership rosterin the Clinton Admin- sor the Mafiosi and drug lords they are son and conspiracy at the highest levels e istration. "What is distinctively modem of ( our government and society. • sworn to oppose. While not a com about the council these days," Harwood — William F. Jasper

THENEWAMERICAN / SEPTEMBER 18. 1995