DOCSLIB.ORG

Method Behind the Madness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Method Behind the Madness Method Behind the Madness 6/ t"!" t hash..! heenbeen sad,"sad " writes Soviet "I believe in truth and the power of in 1947 and attributed tto 'X.'" It is a ideas to convey the truth," says Go suggestion he made again the following I defector Anatoliy Golitsyn in year in his lengthy analysis memoran M the foreword to his new book, litsyn, and he expresses the hope that his I "wtTto bookwillhelp the people of theWestto dum of March 1989. The PerestroikaDeception, "to observe To those familiar with Foreign Af the jubilation of American and West see the dangers before them "and to re fairs, it is not surprising that the defec European conservatives who have been cover from their blindness." If it is within the power of a book to do that, tor's innocent request went unrequited. cheering 'perestroika' without realizing As the flagship journal of the wodd- that it is intended to bring about their then there is certainly none better than govemment-promoting Council on For own political and physical demise. Lib his for that daunting task. eign Relations (CFR), it has been the eral support for 'perestroika' is under No one better apprehends or more clearly explains the dialectic, the plan leading promoter of perestroika, glas- standable, but conservative support nost, and convergence in the West for cameas a surprise to me." ning framework, and the operational methods of the Communist deception decades. Time magazine hascalled For For one who studied and worked strategy than Golitsyn. We emphasize eign Affairs "the most influential peri within the inner sanctum of Soviet in odical in print." Unformnately, Aat is telligence and who risked his life to Communist because there apparently is a vital dimension of the deception strat- an apt description. As the mouthpiece of warn the West about the Kremlin's pro 0gy which has eluded his otherwise ex the powerful CFR, it not only speaks to gram of strategic deception, it must be and for America's "ruling establish sad indeed, and maddening, to witness cellent grasp ofthis entire subject. An example of this gap in under ment," but, to an incredibly shameful the rush to destruction. "I was ap standing we are referring to can be degree, frames the issues and dictates palled," he says, "that 'perestroika' was the bounds of acceptabledebateon eco embraced and supported by the United found inGolitsyn's secret memorandum to the CIA of January 4, 1988, which nomic and foreign policy matters in this States without any serious debate onthe comprises one of the chapters in The supposedly free republic. subject." Perestroika Deception. ^ After brilliantly exposing The Game Plan In his groundbreaking 1984 book. the treachery and disin- formation involved in Gor- New Lies for Old, Golitsyn laid out, in bachev's visit to the United meticulous detail and with devastating clarity, the diabolical nature ofthe com States, Golitsyn suggested ing perestroika offensive —which he had eight actions the CIA learned about in his capacity as an elite should take to counteract KGB officer 25 years earlier! The strat the perestroika offensive. J|H egy called for ongoing deception opera Number eight reads: "In- tions of fantastic scope which would so vite the National Security gull and disarm the West that itwould Council to consider hav- ^ eventually "converge" with the "re ing this assessment pub- K formed" Communist regimes in a world lished in Foreign Affairs ^ government. through its editor, Mr. "In 1984 I thought that, in the event; William Hyland, under of Westernresistanceto Soviet strategy,, the anonymous cover of ^ ^ the scenario of convergence betweenI 'a KGB defector' along ^ K the two systems might take the next halff the same lines as the ar- g Bil century to unroll," he says in his new/ tide by Ambassador Ken- H B| work. "Now, however, because thej nan which was published West has committed itself to u the support of 'perestroika' and because of the impact of the misguided and euphoric support for it in the Western • ||:i| media, convergence might take less than a decade. The sword of Damocles is hang- ingovertheWestern democ- CFR's Harold Pratt House: Headquarters of an racies, yet they are oblivious BWll "invisible government" In the United States. the NEW AMERICAN / SEPTEMBER 18. 1995 lions more, the CFR policy makers de U.S. forces in itsglobal "peacekeeping" Five ofthe sixmembers ofthe Reagan operations. Administration's National Security vised one excuse after anothertojustify the suicidal and unconscionable trans Council to which Golitsyn referred were "Rediscovering" Karl Marx fers of credit, technology, and other as (or had been) CFR members —George sistance which allowed these bankrupt But an even more telling and alarm Bush, Alexander Haig, Caspar Weinber- regimes tocontinue their tyrannical op ing message is to be found in an article aer, David Jones, and William Casey — pression. And Foreign Ajfairs has been by historian John Lewis Gaddis (CFR), us was Foreign AJfairs editor William past president ofthe Society for Histo Hyland, aformer aide to Henry Kissin the leading organ that has "sold these treacheries to Congress and the Ameri rians of American Foreign Relations, in ger (CFR), another leading perestroika the same issue of Foreign Ajfairs. En apostle. So was George F. Kennan, au can public. A recent case in point was an article titled "The Tragedy of Cold War His thor ofthe celebrated "X" article which tory," the Gaddis essay commences launched Truman's phony "contain by Paul D. Wolfowitz (CFR), former ambassador and Defense Undersec with a paean to Marxist historian Will ment" policy. As were some 200 addi iam Appleman Williams and asks rhe tional key members of the Reagan retary, and now dean of the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International torically, "what was the Cold War all Administration, including virtually all about?" His answer is interesting and ofhis top State Department officials. Studies at Johns Hopkins University, in significant, in that it reflects Invisible Government dom: "Given what we know of Indeed, CFR members have the Soviet Union's internal fra so dominated every Adminis- gility ... given persuasive evi tration — whether Democrat IthedenceregnantthatEstablishmentan internationalwis orRepublican —from FDR up communist monolith never re tothe present that the CFR has ally existed; given all of these often justly been called our things, what exactly was the "invisible government." The HjHH threat to American interests CFR has played a central role anyway?" in some of the most disastrous Hgg Reading Gaddis one is not decisions and policies that sure. Notingthat Stalinwas not have aided totalitarian Com- |^B||| "a normal, everyday, run-of- munism and threatened the the-mill statesmanlike head of Free World's security. A short government" and that his list of someof the most signifi- crimes were "horrifying" — an cantofthose policies and deci- < amazing discovery that "liber- sions would include: I als" worldwide have recently • President Roosevelt's dip- I stumbled upon —Gaddis criti- loinatic recognition of the So- I cizes those who failed to see viet Union in 1933. I the evil in Stalin, Mao and the • Launching of the U.S. Ex- I "brutal romantics" who were port-Import Bank in 1934 to 5t" their "clones": "Kim II Sung, help facilitate trade with the GGorbachev: Still a "convincedCommunist: Ho Chi Minh, Pol Pot, Fidel USSR. the January/February 1994 Foreign A/- Castro, Mengistu Haile-Miriam, Babrak • U.S. Lend-Lease aid to save the " Karmal, and many others." USSR from the Nazis and make her a fairs entitled "Clinton's First Year." "President CHntonwas right, of course, "History for a long time was on their world power. it side, and then it ceased to be " says • "Losing" China to the Communists to backPresident Yeltsin strongly in last fall's crisis," wrote Wolfowitz. "Theree Gaddis. "We need to understand why." b)' our support for Mao and our under e And where shall weturnfor this under- mining of Chiang Kai-shek. was no alternative to Yeltsinat the time : that offered any hope for the success of)f standing? Why, to Marx, of course. • President Eisenhower's bridge ;s Mind you, Gaddis isnot suggesting that building" aid to the Soviets in the; democracy inRussia. TheUnited States has a huge stake in that success and inn we study Marx to better understand the 1950s. ,y pernicious doctrines that drive the totali- • PresidentJohnson's "peacefulcoex- the continuation of Russia's generally moderate foreign policy." Moreover,r, tarian ideologies and policies ofour col- istence" in the '60s. i said Wolfowitz, "The end of the ColdId lectivist foes. Not at all. Rather, this • President Nixon's "detente and rh CFR luminary suggests we "follow an- Jimmy Carter's "human rights in the5 War has made cooperative action through the United Nations newly feasible in other piece of advice from William 19-Os. of Appleman Williams, which is that we • The Reagan-Bush concepts off many cases by eliminating the threat of rediscover Karl Marx." Gaddis explains: "linkage" and "engagement" in thee a Soviet veto...." The message is clear: Keep the aid 1980s. It was Marx, more than anyone Decade after decade, as Communist}t spigot flowing to our comrades in Mos- it cow and step up the program to "em- else, who alerted us to the fact that regimes were racking up a body count there are long-term "substructural of over 100 million and enslaving bil-l- power" the UN and further entangle the NEW AMERICAN / SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 "consensus-building process" to address forces in history, and that they It's useless to deny the enormous and shape modes of economic produc unique contribution of Marx, Engels the "major themes of today's complex and Leninto the history of socialthought and interdependent world." tion, forms of political organization, Stripped ofitsAesopian dialectic, the and even social consciousness...
Load more

Recommended publications
  • British Domestic Security Policy and Communist Subversion: 1945-1964
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Apollo British Domestic Security Policy and Communist Subversion: 1945-1964 William Styles Corpus Christi College, University of Cambridge September 2016 This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy William Styles British Domestic Security Policy and Communist Subversion: 1945-1964 This thesis is concerned with an analysis of British governmental attitudes and responses to communism in the United Kingdom during the early years of the Cold War, from the election of the Attlee government in July 1945 up until the election of the Wilson government in October 1964. Until recently the topic has been difficult to assess accurately, due to the scarcity of available original source material. However, as a result of multiple declassifications of both Cabinet Office and Security Service files over the past five years it is now possible to analyse the subject in greater depth and detail than had been previously feasible. The work is predominantly concerned with four key areas: firstly, why domestic communism continued to be viewed as a significant threat by successive governments – even despite both the ideology’s relatively limited popular support amongst the general public and Whitehall’s realisation that the Communist Party of Great Britain presented little by way of a direct challenge to British political stability. Secondly, how Whitehall’s understanding of the nature and severity of the threat posed by British communism developed between the late 1940s and early ‘60s, from a problem considered mainly of importance only to civil service security practices to one which directly impacted upon the conduct of educational policy and labour relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Covert Networks a Comparative Study Of
    COVERT NETWORKS A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES USED BY FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES TO WEAPONIZE SOCIAL MEDIA by Sarah Ogar A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland December 2019 2019 Sarah Ogar All Rights Reserved Abstract From the Bolshevik Revolution to the Brexit Vote, the covert world of intelligence has attempted to influence global events with varying degrees of success. In 2016, one of the most brazen manifestations of Russian intelligence operations was directed against millions of Americans when they voted to elect a new president. Although this was not the first time that Russia attempted to influence an American presidential election, it was undoubtedly the largest attempt in terms of its scope and the most publicized to date. Although much discussion has followed the 2016 election, there have not been much concerted historical analysis which situates the events of 2016 within the global timeline of foreign intelligence collection. This paper argues that the onset of social media has altered intelligence collection in terms of its form, but not in terms of its essence. Using the case study method, this paper illustrates how three different nations apply classical intelligence techniques to the modern environment of social media. This paper examines how China has utilized classical agent recruitment techniques through sites like LinkedIn, how Iran has used classical honey trap techniques through a combination of social media sites, and how Russia has employed the classical tactics of kompromat, forgery, agents of influence and front groups in its modern covert influence campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Inhoudsopgave NIEUWSBRIEF 235 – 15.11.2015
    Inhoudsopgave NIEUWSBRIEF 235 – 15.11.2015 Duitse scholen schrappen viering St-Maarten om moslimmigranten niet te kwetsen ....................................... 3 Veel immigranten hebben AIDS, syfilis, onbehandelde TBC” – gezondheidszorg in Duitsland op de knieën door asielchaos .................................................................................................................................................. 4 VN wil in 2030 verplicht biometrisch ID-bewijs voor ieder mens ....................................................................... 5 AfD politicus: ‘Duitsland op de rand van anarchie en een burgeroorlog’ .......................................................... 6 Staatsschuld stijgt met iedere immigrant bijna 80.000 euro .............................................................................. 7 Refugees not Welcome! Gedragen door het volk: De keiharde “vluchtelingen”politiek van Tsjechië ............... 8 Ook Nederlands Koningshuis gekaapt sinds 1940? .......................................................................................... 9 De Tweede Wereld Oorlog en haar geldmagnaten ......................................................................................... 22 Een zwarte dag voor Turkije ............................................................................................................................ 33 De waarheid over Gaddafi’s Libië .................................................................................................................... 35 Hillary Clinton ontmaskerd
    [Show full text]
  • Rosary Hill Shooters to Clash With
    VOL. 10, NO. 3 ROSARY HILL COLLEGE, BUFFALO, N. Y. MARCH 6, 1959 Dr. Bella Dodd, Ex-Communist, Lawyer To Speak on "Challenge To Americans" Few people in the United States today are more familiar with the objectives of the American Communist Party than Bella Dodd. Her knowledge is the result of first-hand experience, for Dr. Dodd was herself a member of the Communist Party for a number of years. Under the sponsorship of the Student Government Association, Dr. Dodd will speak at Rosary Hill on Sunday, March 8 at 8 :00 P. M. Her topic will be “Challenge to Americans.” Social .Problems Pose Dilemma After receiving her master’s degree from Teacher’s College Colgate Thirteen of Columbia University and her doctorate in law from New York Cheerleaders set for the conflict tonight: 1 to r. (front) To Offer Fest University, Bella Dodd was ad­ Katherine Collins, Kathleen Colquhoun. (back)) Patricia mitted to the New York State Bar Association in 1930. Four Heffernan, Carol Condon, Adele De Collibul Marsha THE COLGATE THIRTEEN, years prior to that she had be­ Randall and Molly Moore. known as “A m erica’s Unique come an instructor at Hunter Collegiate Singing Group,” will Uollege where she remained un­ sing at Rosary Hill on Friday til her resignation in 1938. Con­ Rosary H ill Shooters To Clash March 20. They will give their cern over social problems in concert in the Mafian Social Room at noon. this country and disgust with With Defending D YC Five the mediocrity of fellow Catho­ The Thirteen, formed in 1942 lics gradually drove Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Beggars on Horseback: Creating a Pan- African Power Paradigm for the 21St Century
    Beggars On Horseback: Creating a Pan- African Power Paradigm for the 21st Century BEGGARS ON HORSEBACK CREATING A PAN AFRICAN POWER PARADIGM FOR THE 21ST CENTURY “Set a beggar on horseback and he’ll ride to the devil…”Tshiluba proverb FORWARD This is an Essay on Africa written on the eve of the 21st Century. Initially penned while the author was living in Africa as a cofounder of the Institute For the Development of Pan-African Policy, IDPAP, this essay was intended to serve as that NGO’s Geopolitical, and Economic Overview at the time. Though written in 1998-99, much of what now besets Africa, the AU, and African leaders have their roots in the Historical analysis presented here. Because of its length, “Beggars On Horseback” will be reproduced here in three parts, the last of which will address the current Western, U.S., and Chinese expropriation of Africa’s strategic minerals and resources under the Rubric of Globalization, and the “War on Islamic Extremism or “Terrorism.” DBW On the eve of the 21st century, Africa is up for sale at bargain basement prices. Many African states and Africa’s political leadership seem to engage in dead end diplomatic and economic activity because they perceive Africa as undeveloped rather than unorganized. African leaders have accepted the European concepts of power as hierarchical and external. Consequently, they have acquiesced to Eurocentric power paradigms, which marginalized Africa and wring their hands in despair while accepting the commandments of the IMP from on high. To some Africans desperate for hard currency and favorable foreign exchange selling Africa is just another game they play along with.
    [Show full text]
  • F. Stone's Weekly
    Should Communists Be Allowed to Teach? See Page 2. /. F. Stone's Weekly r. >rom'l mil.!, lie. VOL. I NUMBER 6 FEBRUARY 21, 1953 WASHINGTON, D. C 15 CENTS Anti-Zionism or Anti-Semitism? THE RUSSIANS FEAR WAR AND ARE SHUTTING the last win- at the crossroads of the world, where it can all too easily be dows on the West in preparation for it. That seems the most trampled by contending armies. It needs peace. It' cannot reasonable explanation for the anti-Zionist "show trials" which afford to fight the battles of the great Powers. For no nation have begun in the Soviet world. The Jews are the last people would a new war be a greater tragedy than for tiny Israel on in the U.S.S.R. and its satellites who still had some contact the edge of the petroleum fields which will be the first target with the West through such Jewish philanthropic organiza- of the air fleets. And no people needs peace more than the tions as the Joint Distribution Committee. Jews, a minority everywhere. In a long conflict, the Jews on Soviet policy never went beyond cultural autonomy; cen- the Soviet side will be suspected of pro-Westernism and on the tripetal nationalist tendencies are as much feared as in the days anti-Soviet side of pro-Communism. of the Czars. Nationalism (except at times for Russians) is officially stigmatized as "bourgeois," though the constant at- NONE OF us KNOW WHAT is REALLY HAPPENING IN EAST- tacks on "Titoism" in the satellites show how strongly it sur- ERN EUROPE.
    [Show full text]
  • Ford Settles for Semi-Annual Jobless Benefits
    Mass Pressure Needed on School Jim Crow <•> NAACP Plans New Moves in Southern Courts t h e PUBLISHEDMILITANT ‘WEEKLY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE WORKING PEOPLE By George Lavan The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People held a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, June 5 Vol. XIX — No. 24 267 NEW YORK, N. Y., MONDAY, JUNE 13, 1955 PRICE: 10 Cents to plan its strategy in the fight to desegregate Southern schools. The conference was at­ tended by 55 delegates from 16 without this reaffirmation many Southern and border states. It people might think the court had was decided that legal actions .ndeed reversed its original de- would be started against school jision. Point 2 is but a corollary boards which had not made plans of Point 1. I f school segregation to begin applying the Supreme is unconstitutional then laws Court decision by the opening providing fo r such segregation Ford Settles for Semi-Annual of school next September, cannot also be constitutional. In the meantime NAACP Point 3 is small consolation. branches were urged to put the Fine sounding words like “good heat on local school boards by faith,” “ reasonable,” “ prompt,” petitioning them to begin com­ “ as soon as practicable,” etc., are plying with the high court’s rul­ the sugar coating for the bitter ing. The day before the con­ fact that the court’s ruling is Jobless Benefits Supplement ference nine Negro parents in almost impotent. Atlanta filed such a petition These words were put in to with the Atlanta school board. placate the enemies of segrega­ ted schools and to cover the “PERHAPS A CENTURY” hypocrisy of the court which Referring to a statement by ruled a year ago that segrega­ Open Letter to Foster Workers Hit the Attorney General of Georgia tion was unconstitutional and that the Supreme Court’s de­ which has now ruled, in effect, cision meant “ perhaps a century that it can continue in the Concessions of litigation,” Thurgood Mar­ South indefinitely.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spirit of Democratic Socialism
    The Spirit of Democratic Socialism Paul Kengor PhD “Democratic socialism” is all the rage nowadays. It is framed as a new smiley-faced “socialism.” Those who support it hasten to add that they are “democratic socialists,” as if that sounds or feels better. And yet, groups like the Democratic Socialists of America, the home of democratic socialism in America today—whose members include the likes of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—refer to itself on its website as “the largest socialist organization in the United States.” Even then, with the rise in the attractiveness of “democratic socialism” has come a subsequent rise in the appeal of socialism generally. For a solid decade now, younger Americans in particular have been telling pollsters they favor socialism over capitalism. The surge in interest has been steadily growing, particularly since the Obama era. In retrospect, a turning point came in 2011, when a major study by Pew Research Center found that 49% of Americans aged 18-29 have a positive view of socialism, exceeding the 46% with a positive view of capitalism.1 In 2014, a survey by Reason Magazine and the Rupe Foundation did a deeper dive. It found that 53% of those aged 18-29 view socialism favorably.2 Not long after that survey, Gallup turned up a gem, learning that 69% of Millennials said they would be 1 “Little change in public response to ‘capitalism, ‘socialism,’” Pew Research Center, December 28, 2011, posted at https://www.people-press.org/2011/12/28/little-change-in-publics-response-to-capitalism-socialism/. 2 See: Emily Ekins,
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight of 1950S Women Against Communism and the Rise of Conservatism by Lori May
    Housewives With A Mission: The Fight of 1950s Women Against Communism and the Rise of Conservatism By Lori May Photo of the Cleaver family from the television program Leave it to Beaver. From left: Hugh Beaumont (Ward), Tony Dow (Wally), Barbara Billingsley (June), Jerry Mathers (Theodore AKA "Beaver"). 8 January 1960. ABC Television. Television shows such as, Leave it to Beaver, The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet and Father Knows Best, filled the airwaves, and magazines such as McCalls and Good Housekeeping lined the news stands with pictures of the American way of life in the 1950s. A suburban, middle class life where families lived in a furnished and newly equipped modern home, complete with car, two children and a dog. Where father went to work and mother stayed at home baking and taking care of the family and left the cares of the world to her husband.[1] However, alongside this picture of an ideal America, the media presented the Red Scare, and the threat of communist infiltration that would destroy this American way of life. A considerable portion of white, educated, middle-class housewives and mothers content in their role as wives and mothers embraced the prevailing Red Scare and its rhetoric of anti- Communism and the cult of motherhood, which promoted mothers as defenders of morality and the American way of life against the threat of communism. As a result they established grassroots activities within their children’s schools, and communities and exercised a conservative political voice that would ultimately shift the Republican Party from a democratic moderate party to a more fundamentally conservative right wing party that nominated Barry Goldwater for president in 1964 and placed Ronald Reagan as governor of California in 1966, thus making conservatism mainstream.[2] The activism of middle class, suburban housewives after WWII in their role as mothers was not a new phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perestroika Deception (1998)
    The Perestroika Deception The world's slide towards THE 'SECOND OCTOBER REVOLUTION' ['WELTOKTOBER'] 11 THE PERESTROIKA DECEPTION By thesameauthor: 'New Lies forOld' completed in 1980 and published in 1984, New York, Dodd,Meadand Co. London, TheBodley Head. Paperback Edition, 1986 by Wheatsheaf Books. The Perestroika Deception Memoranda to the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ANATOUY GOUTSYN EDWARD HARLE London &New York IV THE PERESTROIKA DECEPTION First published in Great Britain and the United States in 1995and 1998by: Edward Harle Limited Edward Harle Limited 108Horseferry Road Suite 1209 Westminster 280 Madison Avenue London SWIP 2EF New YorkNY l0016{)802 United Kingdom United States Telephone: +44171-222 2635 Telephone: 212-4475111 Facsimile: +44171-2330185 Facsimile: 212-6791094 Copyright © Anatoliy Golitsyn 1990,1993,1995 and 1998. First published in Great Britain and the United States in 1995. First Edition [1995]: ISBN 1-899798-00-5 Second Edition [1998]: ISBN 1-899798-03-X All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, induding photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without either prior permission in writing from the publishers or a licence permitting restricted copying. In the United Kingdom such licences are issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WIP 9HE. The right of Anatoliy Golitsyn to be identified as the Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the United Kingdom Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. In the United States, the first version of this work was registered on 12th July 1990by the Register of Copyrights, United States Copyright Office under Registration Number418-457.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispelling Disinformation
    SOVIETOLOGY Dispelling Disinformation Tr IM 1^ hisis Part Oneof an interview ably all other publications in that our about GolitS)Golitsyn is that he has been "out I by William F. Jasper, Senior analysis shows that the apparent "Break of theloop" since defecting to Finland JL1 Editor of The New American, with thePast" is a deception, and that with his wife and daughter in 1961, so with Christopher Story, editor of the "perestroika" and post-"perestroika" how could he possibly know what was London-based Soviet Analyst, an intel represent further stages of the Leninist going on? People who say this reveal a ligence commentary, and editor of The World Revolution. failure to understand Golitsyn's signifi Perestroika Deception by Anatoliy Q. From Oxford to Stanford to the cance, and what he has to offer the Golitsyn, the Soviet defector and fa Rand Corporation to London, Paris and West. mous author of New Lies for Old. The Berlin, there are hordes of Soviet In summary, Golitsyn's importance is interview was conducted on August 16 ologists and Soviet defectors who are that, unlike all other defectors, Golitsyn 1995 in the Presidio, San Francisco, busily informing the West about what is discusses and elaborates upon Soviet outside the headquarters of the Gor strategy. By contrast, defectors like bachev FoundationAJSA. Oleg Gordievsky discuss mundane mat ters concerning the manner of their "es Q. Whydid you start publishing Soviet cape" from the Soviet Union, perhaps Analyst, and how does that publication revealing valuable operational informa differ from other sources concerned tion in order to gain the confidence of with Soviet Russia, Communism, etc? (in Gordievsky's case) Britain's MI6, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Nosenko: Five Paths to Judgment RICHARDS J
    CIA's internecine struggle in the 1960s about counterespionage left a cloud over counterintelligence disciplines there. At the core was the chief, James Angleton, and his trusted Soviet defector, Anatoliy Golitsyn; the trigger was the distrusted defection of another Soviet intelligence officer, Yuriy Nosenko. The saga was Homeric. It has been told many times-but never, I think, so well as in this meticulous logical and empirical exercise. The author has been one of CIA's finest intellects. He has published trenchantly in the open literature on theories of deception and counterdeception. Yet one must now acknowledge that cogent exoneration of Nosenko contributed to permanent rejection of Angleton, and eventually to years of reluctance to suspect even Aldrich Ames. So standards for vigilance remain disputable. Nosenko: Five Paths to Judgment RICHARDS J. HEUER, JR. Yuriy Nosenko, a middle-level KGB officer, volunteered his services to the Central Intelligence Agency in Geneva in 1962 and defected to the United States in 1964. His defection initiated a bitter and divisive contro­ versy over his bona fides that lasted at least 10 years, seriously impaired CIA operations against the Soviet Union, and today still simmers beneath the sur­ face of debates about Soviet deception. This study tells much ofthis important and fascinating case, but that is not its only purpose. It also explores some ofthe fundamental yet often unrecog­ nized assumptions that channel our thinking as we analyze the possibility of deception. The Nosenko controversy is used to illustrate five fundamentally different criteria for making judgments about deception. Examination of the controversy shows that the analytical criterion one uses determines what evi­ dence one looks at and possibly the conclusion one reaches.
    [Show full text]