DOCSLIB.ORG

CUWS Outreach Journal #1108

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CUWS Outreach Journal #1108 USAF Center for Unconventional Weapons Studies (CUWS) Outreach Journal Issue No. 1108, 28 March 2014 Welcome to the CUWS Outreach Journal! As part of the CUWS’ mission to develop Air Force, DoD, and other USG leaders to advance the state of knowledge, policy, and practices within strategic defense issues involving nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, we offer the government and civilian community a source of contemporary discussions on unconventional weapons. These discussions include news articles, papers, and other information sources that address issues pertinent to the U.S. national security community. It is our hope that this information resources will help enhance the overall awareness of these important national security issues and lead to the further discussion of options for dealing with the potential use of unconventional weapons. The CUWS is seeking submissions for its annual General Charles A. Horner award, which honors the best original writing on issues relating to Air Force counter-WMD and nuclear enterprise operations. The deadline for submissions is March 31, 2014. For more information, please visit our web-site. The following news articles, papers, and other information sources do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the Air University, U.S. Air Force, or Department of Defense. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions. All rights are reserved. FEATURED ITEM: “Next Steps in Nuclear Arms Control with Russia: Issues for Congress”. By Amy F. Woolf, Specialist in Nuclear Weapons Policy; January 6, 2014. Published by Congressional Research Service; 37 pages. http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/219953.pdf In his 2013 State of the Union Address, President Obama stated that the United States would “engage Russia to seek further reductions in our nuclear arsenals.” These reductions could include limits on strategic, nonstrategic and nondeployed nuclear weapons. Yet, arms control negotiations between the United States and Russia have stalled, leading many observers to suggest that the United States reduce its nuclear forces unilaterally, or in parallel with Russia, without negotiating a new treaty. Many in Congress have expressed concerns about this possibility, both because they question the need to reduce nuclear forces below New START levels and because they do not want the President to agree to further reductions without seeking the approval of Congress. Outreach Journal Feedback or sign-up request: [email protected] Return to Top U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPONS 1. U.S. Tactical Nuclear Arms Mission Could Shift Among NATO Jets 2. Air Force Removes Commander, 9 Others after Cheating Scandal 3. At Core of Nuke Cheating Ring: 4 'Librarians' U.S. COUNTER-WMD 1. 35 Nations Sign Up to Tougher Nuclear Security Standards HOMELAND SECURITY/THE AMERICAS 1. Uranium Stockpile Quietly Exported Back to U.S., Canada Reveals 2. U.S. Aims to Correct Issue Behind 2013 Failed Missile Defense Test 3. Obama: Nuclear Blast a Bigger Concern than Russia 4. Inside the Ring: Defense Talks Scrapped/More Sophisticated Missile Threats ASIA/PACIFIC 1. Japan to Return Weapons-Grade Plutonium to U.S. 2. North Korea Fires 16 Short-Range Rockets into Waters on Sunday 3. N. Korea Fires Two Ballistic Missiles, Prompting Seoul to Take Countermeasures Issue No.1108, 28 March 2014 United States Air Force Center for Unconventional Weapons Studies| Maxwell AFB, Alabama http://cpc.au.af.mil \ https://twitter.com/USAF_CUWS Phone: 334.953.7538 | Fax: 334.953.7226 USAF Center for Unconventional Weapons Studies CUWS Outreach Journal Maxwell AFB, Alabama 4. N.Korea Hints at 4th Nuke Test 5. USFK Chief Says N. Korean Missile to be Capable of Hitting Mainland U.S. by 2024 6. China to Have Nuclear Missiles on Subs Soon: US admiral 7. British Components in North Korean Rockets, UN Finds EUROPE/RUSSIA 1. Russia to Beef Up its Arctic Force 2. Dutch Nuclear-Arms Base Infiltrated on Eve of Summit 3. Ukraine Rules Out Resumption of Nuclear Status 4. US-UK: Expand Missile Defense in Eastern Europe 5. Russian Nuclear Subs to Conduct Bulava Missile Launches in Summer-Autumn 2014 6. Cuts to Armed Forces Undermine Nuclear Deterrent, MPs Warn 7. Russia Launches Nuclear-War Drill, Saying It Was Long Scheduled MIDDLE EAST 1. U.S. Senators Call for a Tougher Stance on Iran's Nuclear Weapons 2. Syria may Miss Final Deadline for Chemical Weapon Destruction 3. US Official Can’t Say Syria Chemical Weapons Fully Tracked Down INDIA/PAKISTAN 1. India Tests New Underwater Nuclear Missile 2. Nuclear-Capable Prithvi II Missile Test-Fired Successfully COMMENTARY 1. World Leaders Fear Ukraine Crisis Will Harm Nuclear Cooperation 2. A Global Zero World Would Be MAD 3. Be Wary of Japan's Nuclear Ambitions 4. Getting Missile Defense Right 5. U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy: After Ukraine, Time to Reassess Strategic Posture 6. A Wobbly Nuclear Order Global Security Newswire U.S. Tactical Nuclear Arms Mission Could Shift Among NATO Jets By Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire March 26, 2014 If NATO partners eventually cease to maintain attack aircraft capable of delivering fielded U.S. nuclear bombs, then allied jets could "pick up the load." Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh raised that possibility during a congressional hearing earlier this month when asked about contingency planning for a potential future in which some European nations that currently host U.S. nuclear weapons opt to retire -- and not replace -- today's aircraft that are capable of carrying either nuclear or conventional munitions. Five NATO countries -- Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey -- are understood to host a net total of fewer than 200 B-61 gravity bombs, though the United States does not formally acknowledge nuclear-basing details. "As NATO nations -- if they choose not to upgrade their own nuclear aircraft capabilities, then other NATO nations that have those capabilities from an operational perspective will pick up the load," Welsh said during a March 14 appearance before the House Armed Services Committee. "That'll be a NATO policy decision. The U.S. will be part of that discussion. We do have the capacity to pick up the load." Issue No.1108, 28 March 2014 United States Air Force Center for Unconventional Weapons Studies | Maxwell AFB, Alabama http://cpc.au.af.mil \ https://twitter.com/USAF_CUWS Phone: 334.953.7538 | Fax: 334.953.7226 2 USAF Center for Unconventional Weapons Studies CUWS Outreach Journal Maxwell AFB, Alabama In his remarks, Welsh did not definitively make clear whether the U.S. Air Force or other alliance members would take on the additional aircraft mission responsibility. Still, the general's comments suggest the Pentagon is planning for its tactical nuclear weapons role in Europe to continue, irrespective of the future air-delivery capability of NATO hosting states. Arms control advocates had previously argued that the United States should withdraw its nonstrategic weapons from the continent if NATO partners do not modernize their dual-capable aircraft. The Obama administration's 2013 unclassified report to Congress on nuclear-employment guidance states that the U.S. military would "maintain the capability to forward-deploy nuclear weapons with heavy bombers and dual- capable aircraft in support of extended deterrence and assurance of U.S. allies and partners." Nuclear weapons continue to be a "core component" of NATO's deterrence against aggression in Europe, the alliance stated in its 2012 Deterrence and Defense Posture Review. At the same time, the allies also said they were prepared to consider reductions to the current number of tactical atomic arms assigned to the defense of NATO nations. Defense Department spokeswoman Cynthia Smith in an e-mail to Global Security Newswire said Welsh's comments were in line with these U.S. and NATO policies. The Pentagon and Air Force did not respond to separate requests for comment on whether any other countries besides the United States were being considered for possibly taking on a new role in the NATO B-61 air delivery mission. However, according to issue expert Hans Kristensen, the United States is the only NATO country with the current military capacity to handle the extra burden. The Air Force has nuclear-capable jets based in Italy, Germany and the United Kingdom that could take on a larger share of the nuclear bombs, said Kristensen, who closely monitors developments in the NATO atomic mission. "The U.S. certainly has the capacity in its Air Force to pick up the slack," Kristensen, who directs the Federation of American Scientists' Nuclear Information Project, said in a recent phone interview. At the core of the issue is aging aircraft. All five host nations of the nuclear bombs field either dual-capable F-16 or Tornado strike aircraft slated for retirement in the 2020s. Some of the countries have said the attack-plane replacements they plan on purchasing would be dual capable, while others have hinted they would allow the nuclear-delivery role to expire along with the aircraft retirements. Most of the current hosting nations are signed up or in talks to acquire the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which is intended to include a future version capable of carrying the B-61 nuclear bomb. "There is one overall trend, which is none of them can afford as much as they wanted," Kristensen said of the NATO partner states' ability to buy the new aircraft. The Dutch government in January confirmed that some of the Joint Strike Fighters it plans to purchase could have a nuclear role, ignoring a 2012 resolution by its parliament urging that the jets not have a dual capability. "The Belgians will probably follow the Dutch in whatever they do," in terms of deciding whether to buy new multirole aircraft, Kristensen said.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kremlin-Linked Forces in Ukraine's 2019 Elections
    Études de l’Ifri Russie.Nei.Reports 25 KREMLIN-LINKED FORCES IN UKRAINE’S 2019 ELECTIONS On the Brink of Revenge? Vladislav INOZEMTSEV February 2019 Russia/NIS Center The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-36567-981-7 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2019 How to quote this document: Vladislav Inozemtsev, “Kremlin-Linked Forces in Ukraine’s 2019 Elections: On the Brink of Revenge?”, Russie.NEI.Reports, No. 25, Ifri, February 2019. Ifri 27 rue de la Procession 75740 Paris Cedex 15—FRANCE Tel. : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00—Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Email: [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Author Dr Vladislav Inozemtsev (b. 1968) is a Russian economist and political researcher since 1999, with a PhD in Economics. In 1996 he founded the Moscow-based Center for Post-Industrial Studies and has been its Director ever since. In recent years, he served as Senior or Visiting Fellow with the Institut fur die Wissenschaften vom Menschen in Vienna, with the Polski Instytut Studiów Zaawansowanych in Warsaw, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik in Berlin, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and the Johns Hopkins University in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in China, Russia and the United States of America
    HUMAN RIGHTS AND POLITICAL REPRESSION Human Rights in China, Russia and the United States of America Jimena Reyes, Ilya Nuzov, Hugo Gabbero Several protesters protect themselves with umbrellas and other objects during protests in Hong Kong on November 18, 2019. Photo by Studio Incendio/Wikipedia The twenty-first century is definitely a multipolar century. The last few years have been characterized by a return to tensions between major regional powers, in particular between the United States and China, with Russia clamoring for the superpower status. China is very openly seeking to promote its political model and become the world’s leading economic power, while Russia seems rather interested in discrediting democracies and increasing its sphere of influence and the United States in maintaining its status as the world’s hegemon and economic leader. We could describe these three countries in terms of gradations, with China being an assumed dictatorship and Russia still keeping the appearances of a democracy, if only nominal, but of its own ‘managed’ type with one loyal party dominating the political scene, farcical elections and most fundamental freedoms flouted. The United States, for its part, showed during the last presidential elections that democratic safeguards still worked and that alternation of power between democrats and republicans was still possible despite Trump’s populism. It is in this context that this article compares the political repression in those three countries and how the Covid-19 is impacting it. 1. Political repression in China, Russia and the United States Political repressions bear many similarities between China and Russia: if the Chinese Communist Party has been holding its grip on power since the creation of the Peoples’ PÀGINA 1 / 20 Republic of China in 1949, making the country a de facto one-party State, Putin’s United Russia Party has now been in power for some two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • What Happens Next? Life in the Post-American World JANUARY 2014 VOL
    Will mankind ARMED, DANGEROUS The reason New ‘solution’ to ever reach Europe has a lot more for world family problems: the stars? nukes than you think troubles Don’t have kids THE PHILADELPHIA TRUMPETJANUARY 2014 | thetrumpet.com What Happens Next? Life in the post-American world JANUARY 2014 VOL. 25, NO. 1 CIRC. 325,015 THE DANGER ZONE T A member of the German Air Force based in Alamogordo, New Mexico, prepares a Tornado aircraft for takeoff. How naive is America to entrust this immense firepower to nations that so recently—and throughout history— have proved to be enemies of the free world. WORLD COVER SOCIETY 1 FROM THE EDITOR Europe’s 20 How Did Family Get Nuclear Secret 2 What Happens After So Complicated? 18 INFOGRAPHIC American B61 a Superpower Dies? 34 SOCIETYWATCH Thermonuclear Weapons in The world is about to find out. Europe SCIENCE 23 Will Mankind Ever Reach 26 WORLDWATCH Unifying 7 Conquering the Holy Land the Stars? Europe’s military—through The cradle of civilization, the stage of the Crusades, the most contested the back door • North Africa’s territory on Earth—who will gain control now that America is gone? policeman • Is the president BIBLE purging the military of 31 PRINCIPLES OF LIVING 10 dissenters • Don’t underrate The World’s Next Superpower Mankind’s Aversion Therapy 12 Partnering with Latin America al Shabaab • No prize for you • Lesson 13 Africa’s powerful neighbor Moscow puts Soviet squeeze 35 COMMENTARY A Warning on neighbor nations of Hope 14 Czars and Emperors COVER If the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Macro-Politics: Political Pragmatism Or, Economic Necessity
    The National Projects December 2019 Population and GDP (2020E data) The long and winding road Population 146.8 GDP, Nominal, US$ bln $1,781 Plans are worthless. Planning is essential” GDP/Capita, US$ $12,132 Dwight D. Eisenhower GDP/Capita, PPP, US$ $27,147 Source: World Bank, World-o-Meters, MA The National Projects (NP) are at the core of the Russian government’s efforts to pull the economy out of the current slump, National Projects - Spending* to create sustainable diversified long-term growth and to improve Rub, Bln US$ Bln lifestyle conditions in Russia. It is the key element of President Putin’s Human Capital 5,729 $88 effort to establish his legacy. Health 1,726 $27 Education 785 $12 We are now initiating coverage of the National Projects strategy. We Demographics 3,105 $48 will provide regular detailed updates about the progress in each of Culture 114 $2 the major project sectors, focusing especially on the opportunities Quality of Life 9,887 $152 Safer Roads 4,780 $74 for foreign investors and on the mechanisms for them to take part. Housing 1,066 $16 ▪ What is it? A US$390 billion program of public spending, designed Ecology 4,041 $62 to stimulate investment, build infrastructure and improve health Economic Growth 10,109 $156 and well-being by 2024, i.e. the end of the current presidential Science 636 $10 Small Business Development 482 $7 term. Digital Economy 1,635 $25 ▪ Is this a return to Soviet-style planning? For some of the NPs, Labour productivity 52 $1 Export Support 957 $15 especially those involving infrastructure, it certainly looks like it.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee of Ministers Secrétariat Du Comité Des Ministres
    SECRETARIAT / SECRÉTARIAT SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRÉTARIAT DU COMITÉ DES MINISTRES Contact: Zoë Bryanston-Cross Tel: 03.90.21.59.62 Date: 07/05/2021 DH-DD(2021)474 Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1406th meeting (June 2021) (DH) Communication from NGOs (Public Verdict Foundation, HRC Memorial, Committee against Torture, OVD- Info) (27/04/2021) in the case of Lashmankin and Others v. Russian Federation (Application No. 57818/09). Information made available under Rule 9.2 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. * * * * * * * * * * * Les documents distribués à la demande d’un/e Représentant/e le sont sous la seule responsabilité dudit/de ladite Représentant/e, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1406e réunion (juin 2021) (DH) Communication d'ONG (Public Verdict Foundation, HRC Memorial, Committee against Torture, OVD-Info) (27/04/2021) dans l’affaire Lashmankin et autres c. Fédération de Russie (requête n° 57818/09) [anglais uniquement] Informations mises à disposition en vertu de la Règle 9.2 des Règles du Comité des Ministres pour la surveillance de l'exécution des arrêts et des termes des règlements amiables. DH-DD(2021)474: Rule 9.2 Communication from an NGO in Lashmankin and Others v. Russia. Document distributed under the sole responsibility of its author, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Nuclear Weapons in Europe
    United States nuclear CND weapons in Europe Around 200 United States nuclear B61 free-fall gravity bombs are stationed in five countries in Europe: Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy and Turkey. While the governments of these countries have never officially declared the presence of these G weapons, individuals such as the former Italian president and former Dutch prime minister have confirmed this to be the case. HE nuclear sharing arrangement is part of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Articles 1 and 2 of N North Atlantic Treaty Organisation’s (NATO) the NPT forbid the transfer of nuclear weapons to T defence policy. In peace time, the nuclear non-nuclear weapon states, but Belgium, Germany, the weapons stored in non-nuclear countries are guarded Netherlands, Italy and Turkey are all non-nuclear. I by US forces, with a dual code system activated in a time of war. Both host country and the US would Even though the UK does not host US bombs any then need to approve the use of the weapons, which more, the UK’s nuclear weapons system has been F would be launched on the former’s airplanes. assigned to NATO since the 1960s. Ultimately, this means that the UK’s nuclear weapons could be used When these bombs were initially deployed, the original against a country attacking (or threatening to attack) targets were eastern European states. But as the Cold one of the alliance member states since an attack on War ended, and these states became part of the one NATO member state is seen as being an attack on E European Union and in some cases NATO itself, the all member states.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Policy Toward Eurasia and the Role of the U.S. Congress
    U.S. POLICY TOWARD EURASIA AND THE ROLE OF THE U.S. CONGRESS May 27 – June 2, 2019 | Prague, Czech Republic U.S. POLICY TOWARD EURASIA AND THE ROLE OF THE U.S. CONGRESS The Aspen Institute Congressional Program May 27 – June 2, 2019 Prague, Czech Republic TABLE OF CONTENTS Rapporteur’s Summary Matthew Rojansky .............................................................................................................. 3 U.S. Policy Toward Eurasia and the Role of the U.S. Congress Thomas Graham ...............................................................................................................17 Getting America Off the Backfoot in Eurasia Evan A. Feigenbaum .........................................................................................................23 Does BRI Really Exist? Robert Daly ......................................................................................................................29 China’s Rise as a Geo-Economic Influencer in Eurasia Philippe Le Corre ...............................................................................................................39 It’s Time to Rethink Russia’s Foreign Policy Strategy Dimitri Trenin ...................................................................................................................47 Is Russia a U.S. 'Adversary' or Just a 'Competitor'? Developing a Sustainable, Realistic U.S. Policy Towards Russia Nikolas K. Gvosdev ............................................................................................................59 The
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    www.jcer.net Journal of Contemporary European Research Volume 14, Issue 4 (2018) Editors Maxine David Christopher Huggins Kenneth McDonagh Editorial Assistant Kamila Feddek ISSN 1815-347X Volume 14, Issue 4 (2018) ISSN 1815-347X Contents SPECIAL SECTION The Next European Century? by Kenneth McDonagh 290-295 Testing the Boundaries of Order? Europe, the European Union and a Changing 296-302 World Arena by Michael Smith The Next European Century? Europe in Global Politics in the Twenty-First Century 303-309 by Brigid Laffan These Are Those That Faustus Most Desires: Identity, Iconography and ‘Europe’ in 310-323 the Crimea Crisis by Russell Foster Hotspots: Questioning the Future of Europe through Its Borders by Elisa Pascucci 324-329 and Emma Patchett Video Interviews European Security in the 21st Century: A Conversation with Dr Nathalie Tocci 330 European Law in the 21st Century: A Conversation with Professor Federico 331 Fabbrini RESEARCH ARTICLES The Relationship between Economic Performance and the Rise of ‘Unholy 332-348 Alliances‘ in the European Union by Marco Morini Reversed Conditionality in EU External Migration Policy: The Case of Morocco by 349-363 Fanny Tittel-Mosser BOOK REVIEWS Simulations of Decision-Making as Active Learning Tools. Design and Effects of 364-366 Political Science Simulations by Katja Biedenkopf 288 Volume 14, Issue 4 (2018) jcer.net ISSN 1815-347X Contributors Katja Biedenkopf, University of Leuven Federico Fabbrini, Dublin City University Russell Foster, King’s College London Brigid Laffan, European University Institute Kenneth McDonagh, Dublin City University Marco Morini, European University Institute Elisa Pascucci, University of Helsinki Emma Patchett, University of Helsinki Michael Smith, University of Warwick Fanny Tittel-Mosser, University of Minho Nathalie Tocci, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome 289 Journal of Contemporary European Research Volume 14, Issue 4 (2018) Preface Kenneth McDonagh, Dublin City University Citation McDonagh, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Report- Non Strategic Nuclear Weapons
    Federation of American Scientists Special Report No 3 May 2012 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons By HANS M. KRISTENSEN 1 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons By HANS M. KRISTENSEN Federation of American Scientists www.FAS.org 2 Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 Acknowledgments e following people provided valuable input and edits: Katie Colten, Mary-Kate Cunningham, Robert Nurick, Stephen Pifer, Nathan Pollard, and other reviewers who wish to remain anonymous. is report was made possible by generous support from the Ploughshares Fund. Analysis of satellite imagery was done with support from the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Image: personnel of the 31st Fighter Wing at Aviano Air Base in Italy load a B61 nuclear bomb trainer onto a F-16 fighter-bomber (Image: U.S. Air Force). 3 Federation of American Scientists www.FAS.org Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons May 2012 About FAS Founded in 1945 by many of the scientists who built the first atomic bombs, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) is devoted to the belief that scientists, engineers, and other technically trained people have the ethical obligation to ensure that the technological fruits of their intellect and labor are applied to the benefit of humankind. e founding mission was to prevent nuclear war. While nuclear security remains a major objective of FAS today, the organization has expanded its critical work to issues at the intersection of science and security. FAS publications are produced to increase the understanding of policymakers, the public, and the press about urgent issues in science and security policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Intervention in European Elections
    S. HRG. 115–105 RUSSIAN INTERVENTION IN EUROPEAN ELECTIONS HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 2017 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–127 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Sep 11 2014 09:42 Nov 07, 2017 Jkt 026127 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\26127.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE [Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d Sess.] RICHARD BURR, North Carolina, Chairman MARK R. WARNER, Virginia, Vice Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MARCO RUBIO, Florida RON WYDEN, Oregon SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico ROY BLUNT, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia TOM COTTON, Arkansas KAMALA HARRIS, California JOHN CORNYN, Texas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky, Ex Officio CHARLES SCHUMER, New York, Ex Officio JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Ex Officio JACK REED, Rhode Island, Ex Officio CHRIS JOYNER, Staff Director MICHAEL CASEY, Minority Staff Director KELSEY STROUD BAILEY, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 09:42 Nov 07, 2017 Jkt 026127 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\26127.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER CONTENTS JUNE 28, 2017 OPENING STATEMENTS Burr, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Racism at the Heart of the British Royal R Suicide
    MAY–JUNE 2021 VOL. 32, NO. 5 CIRC. 243,028 FROM THE EDITOR | COVER STORY 1 Mars Landing: A Preview of Your Incredible Potential! • There’s Intelligent Life FROM THE EDITOR GERALD FLURRY Alright 4 • Intelligence Can’t Solve Man’s Problems 5 Mars Landing: Why Are the Wealthy ‘Woke’? 6 A Preview of The Economy of Tomorrow’s World 11 Your Incredible Transgenderism and the Pursuit of Happiness 14 Potential! Putin and the ‘Greatest Catastrophe’ 19 See images from Mars for what they truly are: The Interview That Shook the a preview of your future mission. Royal Family 23 he world has been dazzled by images from Mars. Amer- Biden Middle East Policy: ica’s Perseverance rover is traveling across the Martian sur- Pushing the World Toward T face and sending back some of the best pictures, video and Christ’s Return 27 even audio that we have ever had from that planet. The mission also includes test-flying a remote helicopter and gathering rock Revealing the Two and soil samples that scientists hope to bring back to Earth later Witnesses 32 this decade. This truly is an amazing and stunning achievement! These scientists are searching for signs of past life on Mars. WORLDWATCH 34 But the overwhelming reality, confirmed by the work of this rover, is that this planet is dead and in a state of decay. SOCIETYWATCH 38 The contrast with the planet we inhabit is unmistakable: Earth is full of life! Mars and every other planet are decayed PRINCIPLES OF LIVING 39 wastelands. Are You Laughing at Things Here is a most exciting truth, revealed in your Bible: The You Shouldn’t? condition of these planets is closely linked with your incredible human potential! COMMENTARY 40 As impressive and inspiring as the Mars landing is, this bibli- Fake History Does Real cal truth makes it a million times more so.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in Russian Studies? Nationalism (Imperialism), Racism and War
    Crisis in Russian Studies? Nationalism (Imperialism), Racism and War TARAS KUZIO This e-book is provided without charge via free download by E-International Relations (www.E-IR.info). It is not permitted to be sold in electronic format under any circumstances. If you enjoy our free e-books, please consider leaving a small donation to allow us to continue investing in open access publications: http://www.e-ir.info/about/donate/ i Crisis in Russian Studies? Nationalism (Imperialism), Racism and War TARAS KUZIO ii E-International Relations www.E-IR.info Bristol, England 2020 ISBN 978-1-910814-55-0 This book is published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 license. You are free to: • Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material Under the following terms: • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. • NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission. Please contact [email protected] for any such enquiries, including for licensing and translation requests. Other than the terms noted above, there are no restrictions placed on the use and dissemination of this book for student learning materials/scholarly use. Production: Michael Tang Cover Image: Triff/Shutterstock A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]