DOCSLIB.ORG

Making Justice Visible: the Mediatization of the World War II War Crimes Trials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Making Justice Visible: the Mediatization of the World War II War Crimes Trials 15:00–16:00 Justinas Žilinskas (Vilnius) Trials for Change: The Impact of Mediatized Trials Conference Venue Conference A Comparative Approach: upon Lithuanian Legal System September 25–26, 2019 Poland, East and West Germany Martynas Mažvydas National Library of Lithuania 18:15–18:45 Gedimino pr. 51, Łukasz Jasiński (Berlin) LT-01504 Vilnius Medialisation of War Crimes Trials in Poland and East Concluding Remarks Germany in Decades of 1950s and 1960s. An Attempt Contact of Comparison 19:00 Gintarė Malinauskaitė Branch Office of the GHI Warsaw in Vilnius Paulina Gulińska-Jurgiel (Halle (Saale)) Dinner (self-pay) Jogailos g. 4 Invisible Achievements, Visible Defeats? LT-01116 Vilnius Media Reports and Real Experience in the Field Phone: (+370-5) 269 0102 of Coming to Terms with the War Crimes. E-mail: [email protected] A Case Study on Poland and Western Germany www.dhi.waw.pl in the 1960’s and the 1970’s www.facebook.com/Vokietijosistorijosinstitutas 16:00–17:00 Victims and Witnesses Concept and Organization Dr. des. Gintarė Malinauskaitė Dr. Justas Stončius Anne Klein (Cologne) Prof. dr. Vygantas Vareikis Law and History in the Making. The FFDJF Dr. Hektoras Vitkus and the “Lischka Trial” in Cologne, 1974 to 1980 Denis Scuto / Elisabeth Wingerter (Luxembourg) Organizing Institutions The Alfred Oppenheimer Testimony and Luxemburg’s Branch Office of the German Historical Institute Master Narrative Warsaw in Vilnius Klaipėda University, the Institute of Baltic Region 17:00–17:15 Making Justice History and Archaeology (BRIAI) Coffee break Visible: 17:15–18:15 The Mediatization Politics, Justice and Public Perceptions of the World War II of the War Crimes Trials in the 1990s War Crimes Trials Vygantas Vareikis (Klaipėda) Photo: Defendants accused of mass murder of Jews The Case of Aleksandras Lileikis in Lithuania 25–26 September 2019 at the trial in Klaipėda, 1964. (1994–2000) Source: LGGRTC Okupacijų ir laisvės kovų muziejus, Vilnius, Martynas Mažvydas National Library inventory number OLKM KF 561/1 of Lithuania 14:15–15:45 17:30–19:00 10:00–11:00 Wednesday, 25 September Public Reactions and Opinions Soviet War Crimes Trials: War Crimes Trials in the Context The Lithuanian Case of the Cold War 9:00–9:15 Giovanni Focardi (Padua) Welcome Everybody’s Talking about It. Public Opinion Zigmas Vitkus (Klaipėda) Meelis Maripuu (Tallinn) and Trials against Fascists in Italy (1943–1948) Paneriai (Ponary): Mass Executions in the Mirror Cold War Show Trials in Estonia: 9:15–10:45 of Soviet Extraordinary Commission (1944–1945) Justice and Propaganda in the Balance Robert Sigel (Munich) Keynote Lecture The Dachau Trials – Public Perception Stanislovas Stasiulis (Vilnius) Kerstin von Lingen (Vienna) and Public Reactions “Under the Name of Soviet Law”: The Trials of the Justice in Times of Turmoil: War Crimes Trials in Asia Lawrence R. Douglas (Amherst) Former Members of the 1(13) and the 2(12) Lithuanian in the Context of Decolonization and Cold War From Aggression to Atrocity: Edith Raim (Augsburg) Police Battalions in Soviet Lithuania Conceptions of the Verbrecherstaat German Prosecution of Nazi Crimes 11:00–11:15 and Public Reactions (1945–1949) Gintarė Malinauskaitė (Vilnius) 10:45–11:00 War Crimes Trials in the Context of the Cold War: Coffee break 15:45–17:15 The Publicization of the 1964 Klaipėda Trial in Soviet Coffee break Lithuania and the USA 11:15–13:15 Medialization of the Eichmann Trial: Trial on Film 11:00–12:30 Reception and its Aftermath 19:00 Media Narratives and Reception Jakub Muchowski (Kraków) Dinner (self-pay) Natalija Arlauskaitė (Vilnius) of the Nuremberg Trials: East Germany Eichmann Trial Reception in the Polish People’s Film Trials of 1960s: Rhetoric of Hybridity and the Soviet Union Republic in the 60s Justas Stončius (Klaipėda) Thursday, 26 September Christine Bartlitz (Potsdam) Hülya Tuncor (Giessen) Allusions to the Holocaust: The Construction of Soviet “Hier spricht Berlin” / “This is Berlin speaking”. Creating a Cosmopolitanized Memory? Lithuanian Documentary Movies about Trials against The Nuremberg War Crime Trials 1945/46 in Reports The Reception of the Eichmann Trial War Crimes 9:00–10:00 and Commentaries of the East Berlin Broadcasting in the Turkish Print Media in the 1960’s Doris Pichler (Graz) Station “Berliner Rundfunk” War Crimes Trials in the Southeastern Europe Jasmin Söhner (Heidelberg) / Máté Zombory (Budapest) The Memory of Justice: Beyond the Nuremberg Trials or the Thin Line of Justice Benas Lastauskas (Vilnius) The Continuation of the Eichmann Trial: Investigation Andrei Muraru (Bucharest) International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg Exposé and Criminal Procedure against “Adenauer’s Chief Between Publicization of the Genocide and Trivialization Katja S. Baumgärtner (Berlin) in Newspaper “Tiesa”: Between Facts and Ideology Aide” Hans Globke (1960–1963) of the Crimes. The Mediatization of the Romanian Gazes on Court – Gender, Film and the Female Post-war Trials Regarding Transnistria Annette Weinke (Jena) 17:15–17:30 Perpetrator in Zagrożenie (PRL 1976, Wacław Florkowski, Danuta Brzosko-Mędryk) Nuremberg, International Criminal Law and Juridical Klara Muhle (Jena) Coffee break Anti-Fascism in the GDR, 1947–1972 Draža Mihailović on Trial: Media Narratives and 13:15–15:00 Internal Discussions in Yugoslavia, Great Britain 12:30–14:15 and the US Lunch break Lunch break.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2015
    Worldwide Investigation and Prosecution of Nazi War Criminals (April 1, 2014 – March 31, 2015) An Annual Status Report Dr. Efraim Zuroff Simon Wiesenthal Center – Israel Office Snider Social Action Institute December 2015 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 Introduction 6 The Period Under Review: April 1, 2014 – March 31, 2015 8 Convictions of Nazi War Criminals Obtained During the Period Under Review 14 Convictions of Nazi War Criminals: Comparative Statistics 2001-2015 15 New Cases of Nazi War Criminals Filed During the Period Under Review 16 New Cases of Nazi War Criminals: Comparative Statistics 2001-2015 17 New Investigations of Nazi War Criminals Initiated During the Period Under Review 18 New Investigations of Nazi War Criminals: Comparative Statistics 2001-2015 19 Ongoing Investigations of Nazi War Criminals As of April 1, 2015 20 Ongoing Investigations of Nazi War Criminals: Comparative Statistics 2001-2015 21 Investigation and Prosecution Report Card 23 Investigation and Prosecution Report Card: Comparative Statistics 2001-2015 34 List of Nazi War Criminals Slated for Possible Prosecution in 2016 36 About the Simon Wiesenthal Center 37 Index of Countries 42 Index of Nazi War Criminals 44 3 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. During the period under review, the most significant progress in prosecuting Nazi war criminals has been made in Germany. This is clearly the result of the dramatic change instituted several years ago vis-à-vis suspected Holocaust perpetrators who served in death camps or Einsatzgruppen, who can now be successfully convicted of accessory to murder based on service alone. Previously, prosecutors had to be able to prove that a suspect had committed a specific crime against a specific victim and that the crime had been motivated by racial hatred to be able to bring a case to court.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazi Concentration Camp Guard Service Equals "Good Moral Character"?: United States V
    American University International Law Review Volume 12 | Issue 1 Article 3 1997 Nazi Concentration Camp Guard Service Equals "Good Moral Character"?: United States v. Lindert K. Lesli Ligomer Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Ligorner, K. Lesli. "Nazi Concentration Camp Guard Service Equals "Good Moral Character"?: United States v. Lindert." American University International Law Review 12, no. 1 (1997): 145-193. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAZI CONCENTRATION CAMP GUARD SERVICE EQUALS "GOODMORAL CHARACTER"?: UNITED STATES V. LINDERT By K Lesli Ligorner Fetching the newspaper from your porch, you look up and wave at your elderly neighbor across the street. This quiet man emigrated to the United States from Europe in the 1950s. Upon scanning the newspaper, you discover his picture on the front page and a story revealing that he guarded a notorious Nazi concen- tration camp. How would you react if you knew that this neighbor became a natu- ralized citizen in 1962 and that naturalization requires "good moral character"? The systematic persecution and destruction of innocent peoples from 1933 until 1945 remains a dark chapter in the annals of twentieth century history. Though the War Crimes Trials at Nilnberg' occurred over fifty years ago, the search for those who participated in Nazi-sponsored persecution has not ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithuania and the Jews the Holocaust Chapter
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Lithuania and the Jews The Holocaust Chapter Symposium Presentations W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Lithuania and the Jews The Holocaust Chapter Symposium Presentations CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2004 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. First printing, July 2005 Copyright © 2005 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Contents Foreword.......................................................................................................................................... i Paul A. Shapiro and Carl J. Rheins Lithuanian Collaboration in the “Final Solution”: Motivations and Case Studies........................1 Michael MacQueen Key Aspects of German Anti-Jewish Policy...................................................................................17 Jürgen Matthäus Jewish Cultural Life in the Vilna Ghetto .......................................................................................33 David G. Roskies Appendix: Biographies of Contributors.........................................................................................45 Foreword Centuries of intellectual, religious, and cultural achievements distinguished Lithuania as a uniquely important center of traditional Jewish arts and learning. The Jewish community
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Justice for Genocide Victims Ina Bartunek Mitchell Hamline School of Law, [email protected]
    Mitchell Hamline School of Law Mitchell Hamline Open Access Student Scholarship 2018 “A Crime without a Name”: In Search of Justice for Genocide Victims Ina Bartunek Mitchell Hamline School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/stusch Recommended Citation Bartunek, Ina, "“A Crime without a Name”: In Search of Justice for Genocide Victims" (2018). Student Scholarship. 7. https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/stusch/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “A Crime without a Name”: In Search of Justice for Genocide Victims. “We are in the presence of a crime without a name…”1 said Prime Minister Winston Churchill on August 24, 1941, during the broadcast to the world about Nazis’ plan to destroy and annihilate Jewish people by using “most senseless of all Nazis offenses…” It is beyond a simple human mind to grasp or understand the magnitude of the Holocaust to the humanity and even harder to accept the deaths of million innocent victims who were killed by the cruelty of Nazi actions. However, the main question should not be WHY but rather HOW to recognize and prevent such future mistakes. My interest in conducting legal research on the of the prevention Holocaust and prosecution of Nazi war criminals is based on my personal experience. I feel obligated to be a part of the movement “NEVER AGAIN”.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H724
    H724 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE March 8, 2000 Carolina as the Keith D. Oglesby Station, in- NATO-led peacekeeping operations in Bosnia Now, Mr. Speaker, some 10 years troduced by the gentleman from South Caro- and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it later, in spite of that so-called legacy, Resolved by the Senate (the House of Rep- lina, Mr. DEMINT, I would have voted ``yea.'' Lithuania is now looking to its future resentatives concurring), That Congress On H.R. 3018, to designate the U.S. postal herebyÐ and building on the progress it has office located at 557 East Bay Street in (1) congratulates Lithuania on the occa- made in the decade since the Soviet Charleston, South Carolina as the Marybelle sion of the tenth anniversary of the reestab- Union broke up. H. Howe Post Office introduced by the gen- lishment of its independence and the leading Today, thousands of Soviet troops tleman from South Carolina, Mr. CLYBURN, I role it played in the disintegration of the are gone. Today, Lithuania is a mem- would have voted ``yea.'' former Soviet Union; and ber of NATO's alliance's Partnership On H.R. 1827, the Government Waste Cor- (2) commends Lithuania for its success in For Peace program and is looking for- implementing political and economic re- ward to the day when it may become a rections Act, introduced by the gentleman from forms, which may further speed the process Indiana, Mr. BURTON, I would have voted of that country's integration into European full member of that alliance. And, ``yea.'' and Western institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OTHES DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation „Die ‚Watch List‘-Entscheidung betreffend Dr. Kurt Waldheim – Rechtsgrundlagen und Immigrationsfallrecht mit NS-Bezug“ Verfasser Mag. Maximilian Schnödl angestrebter akademischer Grad Doktor der Rechtswissenschaften (Dr. iur.) Wien, im Sommer 2010 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 083-101 Dissertationsgebiet lt. Studienblatt: Rechtswissenschaften Betreuerin / Betreuer: Prof. Dr. Ilse Reiter-Zatloukal Meinen Eltern. INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Abkürzungsverzeichnis (Begriffe und Literatur) 9 1. Abkürzungsverzeichnis (Begriffe) 9 2. Abkürzungsverzeichnis (Literatur) 11 Abbildungsverzeichnis 14 Danksagung 15 I. Beschreibung des Forschungsprojekts sowie seiner Methoden 17 1. Die Forschungsfrage(n) 17 2. Forschungsstand und Quellenlage 18 A. Die Watch List-Entscheidung im Lichte der 1987 geltenden Rechtslage 18 B. Die Watch List-Entscheidung im Lichte der von 1987 bis 2007 geltenden Rechtslage 21 C. Rechtsvergleichende bzw. rechtsphilosophische Aspekte 22 3. Angewendete Forschungsmethoden 22 4. Struktur der Arbeit 23 II. Inhaltliche Einführung 25 1. Vorbemerkungen 25 2. Registrierungsmechanismen und Übereinkommen der Alliierten 25 A. Initiale Konzeptionen 25 B. Die United Nations War Crimes Commission 26 C. Das Central Registry of War Criminals and Security Suspects 28 D. Die Moskauer Deklaration und ihre Folgen 28 3. Relevante internationale Rechtsvorschriften in Kurt Waldheims Fall 30 A. Die Nürnberger Charta 30 B. Das Kontrollratsgesetz Nr. 10 30 4. Exkurs: Gesetzeslage und Gerichtspraxis in Österreich ab 1945 32 A. Einführung 32 B. Rechtspolitische Zielsetzungen im Jahr 1945 32 C. Umsetzung der 1945 geschaffenen Gesetzesbestimmungen 34 D. Konsolidierung der Entnazifizierungsbemühungen 35 E. Die ab 1948 geschaffenen Amnestiebestimmungen 38 F. Weiterentwicklung der NS-Judikatur nach 1955/57 39 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Memory for the Millennium
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Royal Holloway - Pure HHoollooccaauusstt MMeemmoorryy ffoorr tthhee MMiilllleennnniiuumm LLaarriissssaa FFaayyee AAllllwwoorrkk Royal Holloway, University of London Submission for the Examination of PhD History 1 I Larissa Allwork, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: L.F. Allwork Date: 15/09/2011 2 Abstract Holocaust Memory for the Millennium fills a significant gap in existing Anglophone case studies on the political, institutional and social construction of the collective memory of the Holocaust since 1945 by critically analyzing the causes, consequences and ‘cosmopolitan’ intellectual and institutional context for understanding the Stockholm International Forum on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research (26 th January-28 th January 2000). This conference was a global event, with ambassadors from 46 nations present and attempted to mark a defining moment in the inter-cultural construction of the political and institutional memory of the Holocaust in the United States of America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe and Israel. This analysis is based on primary documentation from the London (1997) and Washington (1998) restitution conferences; Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research primary sources; speeches and presentations made at the Stockholm International Forum 2000; oral history interviews with a cross-section of British delegates to the conference; contemporary press reports, as well as pre-existing scholarly literature on the history, social remembrance and political and philosophical implications of the perpetration of the Holocaust and genocides.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.Long.T65
    Cambridge University Press 0521617944 - U.S. Intelligence and the Nazis Richard Breitman, Norman J. W. Goda, Timothy Naftali and Robert Wolfe Index More information Index 1939 Neutrality Act. See Neutrality Act of American Jewish Committee, 45 1939 American Jewish Congress, 26, 45 1948 Displaced Persons Act. See Displaced American War Refugee Board, 55 Persons Act Angleton, James, 152, 327, 339 Arajs, Viktor, 95 Abramson, Alexander, 296 Ardeatine Caves massacre, 319, 328-29, 448 Abwehr, 7, 93-103, 107, 123, 138, 378, “Ardent,” code name of Herbert Katzki, 63 387, 446-47 Argentina, 457 opposition to Nazis in, 94, 99-101 Adolf Eichmann in; Josef Mengele in; Martin Acheson, Dean, 427 Bormann allegedly in. See under South America Adenauer, Konrad, 394, 395-98, 405, 455 Army Counterintelligence Corps, United See AFHQ (Allied Forces Headquarters) 326, 328 States. CIC “Artist,” code name, 125 Agh, László, 228, 231-37, 258n43, 453, 455 Artuković, Andrija, 207, 210, 228, 230-31, Agudas Israel, 6 257n17 Aktion Reinhard, 451 Aschner, Leopold, 130 al-Assad, Hafez, 457 ATIS (Allied Translator and Interpreter Albert, Ludwig, 401-2, 405 Section), 448 Alden, S. S., 45 Augsburg, Emil, 382-84, 389, 401, 449, 453 Aldrich, Winthrop W., 188 alias Dr. Alberti, 389, 401 Alexander, Harold, 326-27 Auner, Kurt, 382, 394 Alexander, Robert, 45-47 Auschwitz, 456 Alexander, Stella, 206 bombing of, 444 Allied Declaration of December 17, 1942, Austrian Resistance Movement. See O-5 41n52, 43n86, 45 Avdzej, John, 228-30, 256n11 Allied Forces Headquarters (AFHQ), 326, 328 Allied Translator and Interpreter Section Badoglio, Pietro, 77, 318 (ATIS), 466 Baer, Th omas, 4 Almansi, Dante, 79, 83 Baldiveso, Angel, 428 “Alperg,” code name of Wilhelm Höttl, 269 Balkans Alpine Redoubt, 267-68, 272, 448 intelligence network, “Dogwood,” al-Qaeda, 444 49; “General Agency 13” and Gehlen Altemeyer, Werner, 96-97 Organization, 382 Altmann, Klaus, alias.
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Human Rights Report - Lithuania Page 1 of 5
    1998 Human Rights Report - Lithuania Page 1 of 5 The State Department web site below is a permanent electro information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see w material released since President George W. Bush took offic This site is not updated so external links may no longer func us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be co endorsement of the views contained therein. U.S. Department of State Lithuania Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1998 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, February 26, 1999. LITHUANIA Lithuania is a parliamentary democracy, having regained its independence in 1990 after more than 50 years of forced annexation by the Soviet Union. The Constitution, adopted by referendum in 1992, established a 141-member unicameral legislature, the Seimas; a directly elected president, who functions as Head of State; and a government formed by a prime minister and other ministers, appointed by the President and approved by the Seimas. The Government exercises authority with the approval of the Seimas and the President. The Conservatives prevailed in the 1996 parliamentary elections, followed by the Christian Democrats. The two parties formed a coalition government (the first in Lithuania's history). In February Valdas Adamkus was elected President by a narrow margin. The judiciary is independent. A unified national police force under the jurisdiction of the Interior Ministry is responsible for law enforcement. The State Security Department is responsible for internal security and reports to Parliament and the President. The police committed a number of human rights abuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Einsatzgruppen
    Juni 1998 Einsatzgruppen Die Einsatzgruppen wurden im Frühjahr 1941 mit dem Zweck gebildet, während des Rußlandfeldzuges die so genannte „jüdisch-bolschewistische Intelligenz“ zu beseitigen. Schnell wurde der Kreis der Opfer erweitert: Zuerst nur die Polit- funktionäre, dann folgten alle Beamten, dann alle Partisanenverdächtigen und schließlich jeder einzelne Jude, erst die Männer, dann auch Frauen und Kinder. Im März 1941 äußerte sich Hitler das erste Mal zu General Jodl über die Notwendigkeit, daß Einsatzgruppen der Sicherheitspolizei (SD) entstehen sollen und eine Vereinbarung mit Hey- drich über die Rolle dieser Einsatzgruppen im Ostfeldzug getroffen werden müsse. Die Wehrmacht erklärte sich mit einer freien und unbegrenzten Tätigkeit dieser Einsatzgruppen einverstanden. Einen Befehl zur Endlösung hatte es noch nicht gegeben. Dieser kam am 21. Januar 1942 während der Wannsee-Konferenz, nachdem schon vorher während des Rußland- feldzuges (Operation Barbarossa) fast eine Million Juden ermordet worden waren. Im Mai 1941 hatte Heydrich ungefähr 3.000 Mann beisammen, die in vier Einsatzgruppen eingeteilt wurden: • Die Einsatzgruppe A sollte der Heeresgruppe Nord in die Baltischen Staaten bis nach Leningrad folgen und wurde von Stahlecker kommandiert. • Die Einsatzgruppe B, von Nebe geleitet, folgte der Heeresgruppe Mitte mit dem Ope- rationsraum zwischen den Baltischen Staaten und Ukraine. • Die Einsatzgruppe C führte Rasch. Sie operierte westlich und nördlich von der Heere- sgruppe Süd. • Die Einsatzgruppe D unter Ohlendorf operierte zwischen Bessarabien und dem Krim- gebiet, im Süden der Heeresgruppe Süd. Die Einsatzgruppen hatten Bataillonsstärke und setzten sich ähnlich wie die Gruppe A zu- sammen: Männer der Gestapo (9 %), des SD (3,5 %), der Kriminalpolizei (4,1 %), der Ord- nungspolizei (13,4 %), ausländischer Hilfspolizei (8,8 %) und der Waffen-SS (34 %).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    Worldwide Investigation and Prosecution of Nazi War Criminals (April 1, 2012 – March 31, 2013) An Annual Status Report Dr. Efraim Zuroff Simon Wiesenthal Center – Israel Office Snider Social Action Institute December 2013 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 5 Introduction 7 The Period Under Review: April 1, 2012 – March 31, 2013 9 Convictions of Nazi War Criminals Obtained During the Period Under Review 15 Convictions of Nazi War Criminals: Comparative Statistics 2001-2013 16 New Cases of Nazi War Criminals Filed During the Period Under Review 17 New Cases of Nazi War Criminals: Comparative Statistics 2001-2013 18 New Investigations of Nazi War Criminals Initiated During the Period Under Review 19 New Investigations of Nazi War Criminals: Comparative Statistics 2001-2013 20 Ongoing Investigations of Nazi War Criminals As of April 1, 2013 21 Ongoing Investigations of Nazi War Criminals: Comparative Statistics 2001-2013 22 Investigation and Prosecution Report Card 24 Investigation and Prosecution Report Card: Comparative Statistics 2001-2013 35 SWC Most Wanted List of Nazi War Criminals 37 About the Simon Wiesenthal Center 42 Index of Countries 47 Index of Nazi War Criminals 49 3 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. During the period in question the investigation and prosecution of Nazi war criminals continued in at least ten countries, among them Germany, Austria and Poland, in which the crimes of the Holocaust were committed, as well as the United States and Canada, which afforded a postwar haven to Holocaust perpetrators. Although the number of Nazi war criminals indicted and convicted during the period under review dropped considerably, there was very good news from Germany, where a comprehensive search for Auschwitz guards was initiated, which yielded unusually successful results subsequent to the period reviewed in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • October Layout 1
    AMERICAN & INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR YAD VASHEM Vol. 43-No. 1 ISSN 0892-1571 September/October 2016-Tishri/Cheshvan 5777 LEADERSHIP MISSION VISITS POLAND AND ISRAEL er, eager to share the special experi- presence of the third generation was life for centuries. BY ISAAC BENJAMIN ence together. a strong influence on the entire group. Outside of Wroclaw was the Sixteen young adults represented “Seeing all the young people on this Wolfsberg forced labor camp. Built as n the summer of 2015, supporters the American Society’s Young trip has been an inspiration. Their a series of tunnels underneath a small from the American Society for Yad I Leadership Associates as the third vitality and enthusiasm all along the mountain, it was where thousands of Vashem first began discussing a Jewish prisoners were forced into prospective mission to Poland and hard labor. As the group walked Israel. Understanding its unique sta- through the damp tunnels, Yad tus as the world’s preeminent Vashem guides recounted the story of Holocaust institution, the American Naphtali Stern, a prisoner at Society considered such a trip an Wolfsberg. Trading his rations for a exceptional opportunity to reflect on pencil stub, Stern wrote the Rosh the importance of Holocaust remem- Hashanah service from memory onto brance in the 21st century. A little scraps torn from bags of cement. more than a year later, the 31 Stern survived the Holocaust and Americans on the Leadership Mission later in life donated his cherished joined their international partners in prayer book to Yad Vashem. Later on, this unforgettable profound testament each participant received a replica of to Yad Vashem’s crucial role as the the “Wolfsberg Machzor,” its tattered World Holocaust Remembrance edges a reminder of the unimaginable Center.
    [Show full text]