DOCSLIB.ORG

Uranium for Nuclear Power: an Introduction 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uranium for Nuclear Power: an Introduction 1 Stichting Laka: Documentatie- en onderzoekscentrum kernenergie De Laka-bibliotheek The Laka-library Dit is een pdf van één van de publicaties in This is a PDF from one of the publications de bibliotheek van Stichting Laka, het in from the library of the Laka Foundation; the Amsterdam gevestigde documentatie- en Amsterdam-based documentation and onderzoekscentrum kernenergie. research centre on nuclear energy. Laka heeft een bibliotheek met ongeveer The Laka library consists of about 8,000 8000 boeken (waarvan een gedeelte dus ook books (of which a part is available as PDF), als pdf), duizenden kranten- en tijdschriften- thousands of newspaper clippings, hundreds artikelen, honderden tijdschriftentitels, of magazines, posters, video's and other posters, video’s en ander beeldmateriaal. material. Laka digitaliseert (oude) tijdschriften en Laka digitizes books and magazines from the boeken uit de internationale antikernenergie- international movement against nuclear beweging. power. De catalogus van de Laka-bibliotheek staat The catalogue of the Laka-library can be op onze site. De collectie bevat een grote found at our website. The collection also verzameling gedigitaliseerde tijdschriften uit contains a large number of digitized de Nederlandse antikernenergie-beweging en magazines from the Dutch anti-nuclear power een verzameling video's. movement and a video-section. Laka speelt met oa. haar informatie- Laka plays with, amongst others things, its voorziening een belangrijke rol in de information services, an important role in the Nederlandse anti-kernenergiebeweging. Dutch anti-nuclear movement. Appreciate our work? Feel free to make a small donation. Thank you. www.laka.org | [email protected] | Ketelhuisplein 43, 1054 RD Amsterdam | 020-6168294 Woodhead Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier The Officers’ Mess Business Centre, Royston Road, Duxford, CB22 4QH, UK 50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, OX5 1GB, UK Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (144) (0) 1865 843830; fax (144) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier website at http://elsevier.com/locate/permissions, and selecting Obtaining permission to use Elsevier material. Notices No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN: 978-0-08-100307-7 (print) ISBN: 978-0-08-100333-6 (online) For information on all Woodhead Publishing visit our website at https://www.elsevier.com/ Publisher: Joe Hayton Acquisition Editor: Alex White Editorial Project Manager: Alex White Production Project Manager: Omer Mukthar Designer: Mark Rogers Typeset by MPS Limited, Chennai, India Uranium for nuclear power: an introduction 1 Ian Hore-Lacy World Nuclear Association, London, United Kingdom 1.1 Introduction and history Compared with other mineral commodities, especially metals, whose utility has become evident by centuries of trial and error, the appreciation of uranium has developed from theories based in physics in the 1930s to exploit the unique energy density of uranium’s transformation in nuclear fission. Initially this was in the crucible of a world war, but always beyond military uses was the promise of the “uranium boiler” canvassed in the second British MAUD (Military Application of Uranium Detonation) report in July 1941—the work of “one of the most effective scientific committees that ever existed.” Less than eight years after atomic bombs demonstrated the immense potential of uranium, the first precursor of today’s power reactors and numerous naval reactors had started up in Idaho, and a year later, electricity was generated in Russia. The focus was now on safe, controlled, long-lasting, and economical machines to harness nuclear fission for reliable electricity supplies. The focus has remained there, with over 500 civil nuclear reactors notching up more than 16,000 reactor- years of operation to 2015 with remarkably few accidents—and even those acci- dents had far less adverse effects than feared. Today nuclear power has a unique position in relation to national energy policies as the only well-proven technology able to be deployed anywhere that can provide continuous reliable supply of electricity on a large scale and without nearly any CO2 emissions or air pollution. It is widely agreed that energy generally, and elec- tricity in particular, must increasingly be produced with much lower carbon dioxide emissions than hitherto. And as one-third of the world’s population aspires to enjoy the benefits of electricity that they have so far missed out on, the question of afford- ability looms larger than in the West, where it is by no means insignificant as a cost of living and an input to production, which must be competitive. Nuclear plants operate at low cost, and make electricity very affordable relative to any other low-carbon source. Reliability is a key attribute of nuclear generation, and nuclear plants typically operate at near full capacity 24 h per day and year-round with only a pause for refueling every 18À24 months. This operation is irrespective of weather or season. However, nuclear power is capital-intensive and this affects its ability to com- pete in liberalized electricity markets, particularly in competition with subsidized renewables and cheap gas, as elaborated next. Some long-term assurance of Uranium for Nuclear Power. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100307-7.00001-6 © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 4 Uranium for Nuclear Power electricity sales at competitive prices with other sources apart from any subsidies on those is required (and without any subsidy beyond what is required to counter market distortions due to those sources). But the clear message from practically every international authority and their reports is that nuclear power is essential for meeting the world’s growing need for affordable, clean, and reliable electricity. There is no credible reason to not greatly increase its role in world electricity production, and for industrial heat including desalination. 1.2 Energy density, other characteristics The single most remarkable characteristic of uranium is its energy density: the amount of energy that a single kilogram can yield. Even so, exactly how much energy depends on the technology used to liberate it. One fuel pellet the size of a fingertip produces as much energy as one tonne of coal, even in the least efficient reactor. “Natural uranium” is that which is found in nature—mostly in the Earth’s crust in a variety of geological environments. In most nuclear reactors, only about half of 1% of this is actually used, but even so it yields about 500 GJ/kg, about 20,000 times as much as black coal. In a fast neutron reactor, about 60 times this is achiev- able, and one day potentially more if technology and economics were pressed. But, in fact, uranium is fairly common and not a high-priced commodity—it has been less than $100/kg in recent years—so there is little incentive as of yet to push those boundaries from a resource perspective. Like most other elements, uranium occurs as a mixture of isotopes, but with ura- nium, that fact is central to its use. Only one of the natural isotopes is directly usable, and that comprises only 0.7% of natural uranium. Hence, either power plants need to be designed accordingly, or the uranium needs to be enriched in that minor isotope, which is the subject of Chapters 11 and 12. In fact, the latter course of action accounts for 88% of the world’s nuclear power reactors (and all naval reactors). Also, like most metals, uranium occurs in a variety of chemical forms, though most is as a mixed oxide of UO2 and UO3, characteristically U3O8. Chapter 2 offers a deeper discussion. The concentration of uranium in its geological settings can range up to about 20% in some Canadian deposits, though 2%U is generally called a high-grade ore. Geological occurrences where it is defined as “ore” (economically recoverable) range down to about 0.01%U. 1.3 Resource situation Uranium is approximately as common in the Earth’s crust as tin and zinc, and occurs in most rocks. Granites typically have up to 5 ppm U (which incidentally and at higher levels provides the heat for geothermal energy). Seawater contains a vast amount at 0.003 ppm U, which is recoverable, but not economical. Uranium for nuclear power: an introduction 5 Our knowledge of what uranium (or anything else) is in the Earth’s crust arises from mineral exploration activities (see Chapter 3), which are expensive and mostly under- taken by mining companies that have negotiated the right to mine what they find and quantify. Therefore, any figures published based on this refer only to known resources. Beyond geological theorizing, we have little idea of what there is beyond this. The world’s known resources related to cumulative exploration expenditure are shown in figure. It can be seen how increased exploration leads to increased known resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thermal Hydraulics Analysis of the Distribution Zone in Small Modular Dual Fluid Reactor
    metals Article Thermal Hydraulics Analysis of the Distribution Zone in Small Modular Dual Fluid Reactor Chunyu Liu 1,* , Xiaodong Li 1 , Run Luo 1,2 and Rafael Macian-Juan 1 1 Chair of Nuclear Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany; [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] or [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (R.M.-J.) 2 School of Resource & Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, No. 28, Changsheng West Road, Hengyang 421001, China * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 29 June 2020; Accepted: 4 August 2020; Published: 6 August 2020 Abstract: The Small Modular Dual Fluid Reactor (SMDFR) is a novel molten salt reactor based on the dual fluid reactor concept, which employs molten salt as fuel and liquid lead/lead-bismuth eutectic (LBE) as coolant. A unique design of this reactor is the distribution zone, which locates under the core and joins the core region with the inlet pipes of molten salt and coolant. Since the distribution zone has a major influence on the heat removal capacity in the core region, the thermal hydraulics characteristics of the distribution zone have to be investigated. This paper focuses on the thermal hydraulics analysis of the distribution zone, which is conducted by the numerical simulation using COMSOL Multiphysics with the CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) module and the Heat Transfer module. The energy loss and heat exchange in the distribution zone are also quantitatively analyzed. The velocity and temperature distributions of both molten salt and coolant at the outlet of the distribution zone, as inlet of the core region, are produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule India Andpakistansanctionsother 15 Cfrparts742and744 Bureau Ofexportadministration Commerce Department of Part II 64321 64322 Federal Register / Vol
    Thursday November 19, 1998 Part II Department of Commerce Bureau of Export Administration 15 CFR Parts 742 and 744 India and Pakistan Sanctions and Other Measures; Interim Rule federal register 64321 64322 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 223 / Thursday, November 19, 1998 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of missile technology reasons have been Export Administration, Department of made subject to this sanction policy Bureau of Export Administration Commerce, P.O. Box 273, Washington, because of their significance for nuclear DC 20044. Express mail address: explosive purposes and for delivery of 15 CFR Parts 742 and 744 Sharron Cook, Regulatory Policy nuclear devices. [Docket No. 98±1019261±8261±01] Division, Bureau of Export To supplement the sanctions of Administration, Department of RIN 0694±AB73 § 742.16, this rule adds certain Indian Commerce, 14th and Pennsylvania and Pakistani government, parastatal, India and Pakistan Sanctions and Avenue, NW, Room 2705, Washington, and private entities determined to be Other Measures DC 20230. involved in nuclear or missile activities FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: to the Entity List in Supplement No. 4 AGENCY: Bureau of Export Eileen M. Albanese, Director, Office of to part 744. License requirements for Administration, Commerce. Exporter Services, Bureau of Export these entities are set forth in the newly ACTION: Interim rule. Administration, Telephone: (202) 482± added § 744.11. Exports and reexports of SUMMARY: In accordance with section 0436.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview: the Dual Fluid Reactor the Public Is Ready for Nuclear Power
    Interview: The Dual Fluid Reactor The Public is Ready for Nuclear Power Dr. Ahmed Hussein is Professor Emeritus of physics at University of Northern British Columbia currently stationed at TRIUMF, Canada’s National Laboratory for particle and nuclear physics in Vancouver, British Columbia. He is also an Associate Member of the Institute for Solid State Nuclear Physics (IFK) in Berlin, Germany. He was interviewed on September 16, 2014 by Robert Hux for 21st Century Science & Technology. Robert Hux – Dr. Hussein, we met you recently at the millions of tons of green house gases and the 320,000 Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference here in Vancouver, tonnes of ash containing toxic heavy metals and tens of where you presented a very interesting new design for thousands of tonnes of sulfur and nitrogen oxides that a nuclear fission reactor.1 How does your design differ are produced by fossil fuel power stations. Furthermore, from the nuclear fission reactors which have been de- nuclear power reactors do not emit any radioactive ma- veloped since the 1950s? terials into the atmosphere during operation, while coal- Dr. Ahmed Hussein – Our reactor, called the Dual fired stations emit radioactive materials that are mixed Fluid Reactor (DFR)2, was designed to solve many of the naturally with coal. problems which exist now with the current reactors that Our reactor concept has a simpler design that avoids people are afraid of. Current reactors have some designs most of the problems that we have right now. And it will that actually originated in the military use of nuclear actually make nuclear power a lot cheaper, safer, most- power in the old days of the Manhattan Project, and they ly carbon-free, and better to use than any other energy were adapted to civilian use.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 145/Monday, August 2, 2021/Notices
    41540 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE III. Investigation Process Producers Will Face Increasing Import A. Initiation of Investigation Competition Bureau of Industry and Security B. Public Comments VIII. Conclusion C. Site Visits and Information Gathering A. Determination RIN 0694–XC078 Activities B. Economic Impacts of 25 Percent U.S.- D. Interagency Consultation Origin Requirement Publication of a Report on the Effect of E. Review of the Department of Commerce C. Public Policy Proposals Imports of Uranium on the National 1989 Section 232 Investigation on Security: An Investigation Conducted Uranium Imports Appendices Under Section 232 of the Trade IV. Product Scope of the Investigation Appendix A: Section 232 Investigation Expansion Act of 1962, as Amended V. Background on the U.S. Nuclear Industry Notification Letter to Secretary of Defense A. Summary of the U.S. Uranium Fuel James Mattis, July 18, 2018 AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Cycle Appendix B: Federal Register Notices— Security, Commerce. B. Summary of U.S. Nuclear Power Notice of Requests for Public Comments on Generation Industry ACTION: Publication of a report. Section 232 National Security Investigation VI. Global Uranium Market Conditions of Imports of Uranium, July 25, 2018; SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and A. Summary of the Global Uranium Market Change in Comment Deadline for Section Security (BIS) in this notice is B. Uranium Transactions: Book Transfers 232 National Security Investigation of and Flag Swaps publishing a report that summarizes the Imports of Uranium, September 10, 2018 C. The Effect of the Fukushima Daiichi Appendix C: Summary of Public Comments findings of an investigation conducted Incident on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 10-K 1203 Final
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the year ended December 31, 2003 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 1-14287 USEC Inc. Delaware 52-2107911 (State of incorporation) (I.R.S. Identification No.) 2 Democracy Center 6903 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (301) 564-3200 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Exchange on Which Registered Common Stock, par value $.10 per share New York Stock Exchange Preferred Stock Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No . Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.) Yes X No As of December 31, 2003, there were 82,554,000 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013 / 2014
    Technische Universität München Department of Mechanical Engineering Mechanical Engineering Annual Report Imprint Technische Universität München Department of Mechanical Engineering Boltzmannstraße 15 85748 Garching near Munich Germany www.mw.tum.de Editor: Prof. Dr. Tim C. Lüth, Dean Sub-editor: Dr. Till v. Feilitzsch Layout: Fa-Ro Marketing, Munich Photo credits: Uli Benz, Thomas Bergmann, Astrid Eckert, Kurt Fuchs, Andreas Gebert, Haslbeck, Andreas Heddergott, Mittermüller Bildbetrieb, Wotan Wilden and further illustrations by the institutes March 2015 Technische Universität München Department of Mechanical Engineering Mechanical Engineering Annual Report 2013-2014 Content Preamble 6 TUM Department of Mechanical Engineering 7 Department Board of Management 8 Teaching 10 Research 11 Ranking Results 12 Facts and Figures 13 Projects and Clusters 14 Divisions of the Department of Mechanical Engineering 16 Faculty Graduate Center Mechanical Engineering 26 Center of Key Competences 27 Elected Representatives 28 Faculty Members 29 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Nikolaus Adams Institute of Aerodynamics and Fluid Mechanics 36 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Horst Baier Institute of Lightweight Structures 45 Prof. Dr. Klaus Bengler Institute of Ergonomics 49 Prof. Dr. Sonja Berensmeier Bioseparation Engineering Group 55 Prof. Dr. Carlo L. Bottasso Wind Energy Institute 58 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Klaus Drechsler Institute for Carbon Composites 63 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Michael W. Gee Mechanics & High Performance Computing Group 68 Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Dipl.-Geophys. Christian Große Institute of Non-destructive Testing 72 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Willibald A. Günthner Institute for Materials Handling, Material Flow, Logistics 75 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Oskar J. Haidn Institute of Flight Propulsion 84 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Oskar J. Haidn Space Propulsion Group 90 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Reported Morbidities Among Tribal Workers Residing Adjacent the Turamdih Uranium Mine and Mill in Jharkhand, India
    Self-Reported Morbidities among Tribal workers Residing adjacent the Turamdih Uranium Mine and Mill in Jharkhand, India. Ashwani Kumar1, K. C. Das2 1Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist, FP Track20 Avenir Health, India Email: [email protected] Contact No: 91+9969789292 ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5515-2840 2Professor, Department of Migration and Urban Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India – 400088 Email: [email protected] Abstract The study was conducted among 411 main workers of tribal communities, aged 15-59 years, residing surrounding hazardous uranium tailing pond of Turamdih Uranium mine in Jharkhand, India. The survey was conducted between January and June 2016. The objective of the study was to explore the differential morbidities among mineworkers and non- mineworkers and the association of the morbidity with various socio-demographic factors. Chi-square test, and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis. The results indicate that the prevalence of digestive problems, skin diseases, cancerous diseases, and urinary dysfunction was significantly higher among the Uranium mine-workers than the non-mineworkers. The main workers living within a range of 2 km from the tailing pond being more likely to suffer digestive problems (OR=1.57; 95% CI, 0.94–2.60) and respiratory illnesses (OR=1.89; 95% CI, 1.06–3.37) than those living further away. The findings have important program and policy implications related to safety measures, nuclear regulation acts, and resettlement of tribal victims. Keywords: uranium mining, radiation, mineworkers, morbidities, tailing pond, distance Introduction In view of alternate sources of efficient energy generation, Uranium has gained enormous global importance driven by its medical, military and civil applications, albeit with potential safety and environmental legacies.(1) In India, Uranium Corporation of India (UCIL), founded in 1967 under the Department of Atomic Energy, is responsible for the mining and milling of uranium ore.
    [Show full text]
  • SVI Foresight Strategic Vision Institute Islamabad
    SVI Foresight Volume 3, Number 1 January 2017 Compiled & Edited by: S. Sadia Kazmi Strategic Vision Institute Islamabad SVI Foresight Volume 3, Number 1 January 2017 Compiled & Edited by: S. Sadia Kazmi Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this edition are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Strategic Vision Institute. Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) Strategic Vision Institute (SVI) is an autonomous, multidisciplinary and non-partisan institution, established in January 2013. It is a non-governmental and non-commercial organization, administered by a Board of Governors (General Body) supervised under a Chairperson and administered by a Management Committee headed by a President/Executive Director. SVI aims to project strategic foresight on issues of national and international import through dispassionate, impartial and independent research, analyses and studies. The current spotlight of the SVI is on the national security, regional and international peace and stability, strategic studies, nuclear non- proliferation, arms control, and strategic stability, nuclear safety and security and energy studies. SVI Foresight SVI Foresight is a monthly electronic journal. It has a multi-disciplinary perspective highlighting on the contemporary strategic and security studies. The Journal is envisioned to be a collection of policy-oriented articles written by its Research Associates, Visiting Faculty and professional experts. The objective is to provide
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Mining and Heap Leaching in India and Related Safety Measures — a Case Study of Jajawal Mines
    XA0103131 URANIUM MINING AND HEAP LEACHING IN INDIA AND RELATED SAFETY MEASURES — A CASE STUDY OF JAJAWAL MINES V.P. SAXENA Atomic Minerals Division, Department of Atomic Energy, Uniara Garden, Jaipur S.C. VERMA Atomic Minerals Division, Department of Atomic Energy Civil Lines, Nagpur India Abstract Exploration and exploitation of uranium involves drilling, mining, milling and extraction processes including heap leaching in some cases. At the exploration stage, the country's laws related to statutory environmental clearance covering forest and sanctuaries or Coastal Regulatory Zones (CRZ) are: equally applicable for atomic minerals. At the developmental mining or commercial exploitation stage in addition to the environmental impact assessment, the provisions of Atomic Energy (working of Mines, Minerals and handling of Prescribed Substances) Rules 1984 are also to be followed which covers radiation monitoring, pollution control and other safety measures which are enforced by licensing authorities and the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) of India. In India, Jaduguda, Bhatin, Narwapahar in Singhbhum Thrust Belt (STB), Asthota and Khiya in Siwaliks, Domiasiat in Cretaceous sandstones, Bodal and Jajawal in Precambrian crystallines, are some of the centres, where mining has been carried out up to various underground levels. Substantial amount of dust and radon gas are generated during mining and milling operations. Though uranium mining is considered as hazardous for contamination by radionuclides, it is observed that many non-uranium mines have registered up to 100 mWL radon concentration, e.g. copper mines in STB area show up to 900 mewl in a few cases. Compared to this the Uranium mines in India have not shown any increase over the limits prescribed by AERB.
    [Show full text]
  • NRC Collection of Abbreviations
    I Nuclear Regulatory Commission c ElLc LI El LIL El, EEELIILE El ClV. El El, El1 ....... I -4 PI AVAILABILITY NOTICE Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources: 1. The NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Lower Level, Washington, DC 20555-0001 2. The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P. 0. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328 3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161-0002 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publica- tions, it is not intended to be exhaustive. Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; licensee event reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee docu- ments and correspondence. The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the Government Printing Office: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference pro- ceedings, international agreement reports, grantee reports, and NRC booklets and bro- chures. Also available are regulatory guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regula- tions, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. Documents available from the National Technical Information Service Include NUREG-series reports and technical reports prepared by other Federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open literature items, such as books, journal articles, and transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Parastatal and Private Entities Determined to Be Involved In
    INDIAN PARASTATAL AND PRIVATE ENTITIES INVOLVED IN NUCLEAR OR MISSILE ACTIVITIES AURO Engineering, Pondicherry Ammonia Plants Collocated with Heavy Water Plants: Baroda, Hazira, Talcher,Thal-Vaishet in Maharashtra, Tuticorin Baroda Ammonia Plant, Gujarat Fertilizers Bharat Dynamics Ltd., Hyderabad, Bhanur Bharat Earth Movers, Ltd. (BEML), Bangalore Bharat Electronics, Ltd. (BEL), Bangalore, Hyderabad, Ghaziabad Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. (BHEL), Trichy (Tiruchirapalli), Hyderabad, Hardwar, New Delhi, Ranipet Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. (ECIL), Hyderabad Ferrodie Private, Ltd. (FPL), Thane Fertilizer Corporation of India, Talcher Ammonia Plant, Talcher Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing, Ltd., Precision Equipment Division (PED) and Tool Room Division, Mumbai (formerly Bombay) Hazira Ammonia Plant, Kirshak Bharati Cooperative, Ltd., Hazira Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.(HAL), Aerospace and Engine Divisions, Bangalore India Rare Earths Ltd. (IREL), Mumbai (formerly Bombay) Minerals Recovery Plant, Chavara Mineral Separation Plant, Chhatrapur in Orissa Orissa Sands Complex (OSCOM), Chhatrapur in the Gunjan District of Orissa Rare Earth Development Laboratory (a.k.a. Thorium Plant),Trombay (suburban city of Mumbai (formerly Bombay)) Rare Materials Plant, Mysore Thorium Plant, Chhatrapur in Orissa Zirconium Oxide Plant, Manavalakuruchi Kirloskar Brothers, Ltd. (KB), Pune Larsen & Toubro, Hazira Works, Hazira Machine Tool Aids & Reconditioning (MTAR), Hyderabad Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd. (MIDHANI), Hyderabad Nuclear Power Corporation of India
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Nuclear Chronology
    Kazakhstan Nuclear Chronology 2010 | 2009-2000 | 1999-1990 Last update: August 2010 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation. 2010 16 June 2010 It was announced that plans for a joint uranium enrichment center (UEC) between Kazakhstan and Russia located at the Angarsk Electro-Chemical Combine were dropped due to lack of economic feasibility. Reportedly, Kazakhstan may instead buy shares in one of Russia's four already operating enrichment centers. The UEC is separate from the international uranium enrichment center (IUEC) already operating in Angarsk. IUEC, created with the IAEA's approval, is meant to provide uranium enrichment for civilian purposes to states party to the NPT. Kazakhstan and Russia are already partners at the IUEC, with Rosatom owning 90%. Ukraine and Armenia are expected to join the project. — Judith Perera, "Change of plan on Kazakh uranium enrichment," McCloskey Nuclear Business, 16 June 2010.
    [Show full text]