DOCSLIB.ORG

Meanings of Figures of Speech Used in Tourism Advertising Slogan Texts in the Internet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI MEANINGS OF FIGURES OF SPEECH USED IN TOURISM ADVERTISING SLOGAN TEXTS IN THE INTERNET A THESIS Presented as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Magister Humaniora (M. Hum.) Degree in English Language Studies SISKA BOCHARI Student Number: 096332020 THE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2011 i PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI iii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY This is to certify that all ideas, phrases, sentences, unless otherwise stated, are the ideas, phrases, and sentences of the thesis writer. The writer understands the full consequences including degree cancellation if she took somebody else's ideas, phrases, or sentences without proper references. Yogyakarta, 17 March 2011 SISKA BOCHARI iv PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, saya mahasiswa Universitas Sanata Dharma: Nama : Siska Bochari Nomor Mahasiswa : 096332020 Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul: Meanings of Figures of Speech Used in Tourism Advertising Slogan Texts in the Internet beserta perangkat yang diperlukan. Dengan demikian saya memberikan hak kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma untuk menyimpan, mengalihkan dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalan data, mendistribusikan secara terbatas, dan mempublikasikannya di internet atau media lain untuk kepentingan akademis tanpa perlu meminta izin dari saya maupun memberikan royalti kepada saya selama tetap mencantumkan nama saya sebagai penulis. Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya. Dibuat di Yogyakarta Pada tanggal: 17 Maret 2011 Yang menyatakan, Siska Bochari v PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, Alhamdulillahirabbil’alamin, I praise to Allah SWT, the Most Gracious and the Most Merciful who has given me the greatest love, grace, and blessing that I have finished this thesis. My deepest gratitude and appreciation goes to Dr. B. B. Dwijatmoko, M.A. as my advisor, who gave me advice and guidance during the writing of this thesis especially in GRP class. I would also like to extend my gratefulness to all lectures, Prof. Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo, Prof. Bakdi Soemanto, Dr. J. Bismoko, Dr. Fr. B. Alip, M.Pd., M.A., F.X. Mukarto, Ph.D, Dr. Novita Dewi, M.S., M.A. (Hons.), Dr. Alb. Budi Susanto, S.J. and staff of English Language Studies, Sanata Dharma University, who have taught, guided, and helped me during the study. My endless love and appreciation are presented to my beloved mother for her never ending support and prayer, my late father for his love, my brother and sisters who have supported me to accomplish my study. You have been there for me and helped me to get through every happy and sad moment in my life. Very special thanks to all ELS students of 2009 class, especially my best friends, Suzana „emak‟ Maria, Vivi „giant‟ Rachmawati, Tira „tuyul‟ Mariana, thanks for being there for me both in ups and downs, thanks for every kindness that you give me; love, care, and friendship. For “someone” in heaven, thanks for everything, it was so precious. Memory of you will still remain. Last but not least, I would like to thank to my colleagues at Tadulako University, who have given me opportunity to continue my study. May God bless you all. vi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE …………………………………………………………………....... i APPROVAL PAGE ………………………………………………………………. ii DEFENSE APPROVAL PAGE ………………………………………………...... iii STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ……………………………………………… iv LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS …………………………………………………….. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ………………………………………………………... vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ………..……………………………………………...... vii LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………....... ix LIST OF APPENDICES ………………………………………………………….. x ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………… xi ABSTRAK ………………………………………………………………………... xii I INTRODUCTION ..………………………………………………………… 1 A Background of the Study ……………………………………………… 1 B Problem Formulation ………………………………………………….. 6 C Research Objectives …………………………………………………… 6 D Research Benefits ……………………………………………………… 7 II THEORETICAL REVIEW ………………………………………………… 9 A Literature Review …………………………………………………........ 9 1 Meaning …………....……………………………………………..... 10 a. Meaning Based on Semantics ………………………………….. 11 b. Meaning Based on Pragmatics …………………………………. 14 c. Speech Acts ……………………………………………………. 18 2 Figures of Speech ………………………………………………...... 23 a. Characteristics of Figures of Speech ……...…………………… 24 b. Types of Figures of Speech …………………………………..... 25 c. Purpose of Figures of Speech ……………………………..…… 41 vii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI d. Place of Figures of Speech in Advertisement …………………. 42 3 Advertising …………..…………………………………………….. 43 a. Language of Advertising ……………………………………..... 44 b. Slogan Texts and Text Types …………………………………... 47 c. Short Functional Texts …………………………………………. 50 d. Generic Structure and Lexicogrammatical Features ………….... 50 B Review of Related Studies …………………………………………….. 52 C Theoretical Framework ………………………………………………... 53 III METHODOLOGY ………………………..………………………………... 55 A Type of Study ………………………………………………………….. 55 B Research Data ………………………………………………………..... 56 C Data Analysis ………………………………………………………….. 58 D Test (Result Verification) ……………………………………………... 60 IV ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION …………………..……………………… 62 A Observed Figures of Speech ….....…………..………………………… 62 B Meanings of Figures of Speech .……………………………………….. 73 C Illocutionary Acts in Figures of Speech ……………………………….. 81 V CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………….. 88 BIBLIOGRAPHY ………………………………………………………….. 93 APPENDICES ……………………………………………………………… 98 viii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2.1 CLASSIFICATION OF ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS ……... 20 TABLE 2.2 DEFINITION OF FIGURES OF SPEECH .……………… 39 TABLE 2.3 THE EXAMPLES OF GENRES AND TEXT TYPES .….. 49 TABLE 4.3 THE EXAMPLES OF FIGURES OF SPEECH ….……….. 63 TABLE 4.4 THE EXAMPLES OF MEANINGS …..………………….. 74 TABLE 4.5 THE EXAMPLES OF ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS .………. 81 TABLE 4.6 THE TAXONOMY OF ILLOCUTIONARY POINTS AND EXAMPLES OF ACTS ..………………………………….. 82 ix PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1. LIST OF FIGURES OF SPEECH IN TOURISM SLOGANS .. 98 Appendix 2. LIST OF MEANINGS OF FIGURES OF SPEECH IN TOURISM SLOGANS ………………………………………. 100 Appendix 3. LIST OF ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS IN TOURISM SLOGANS ………………………………………..………….. 102 Appendix 4. LIST OF TOURISM SLOGAN TEXT IN PICTURE (EXAMPLES) ……………………………………………….. 104 x PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ABSTRACT Siska Bochari. 2011. MEANINGS OF FIGURES OF SPEECH USED IN TOURISM ADVERTISING SLOGAN TEXTS IN THE INTERNET. Yogyakarta: The Graduate Program in English Language Studies, Sanata Dharma University. This thesis analyzes about the meanings of tourism slogan texts in internet. Since the language used in tourism slogans is arranged as attractive as possible to grab people‟s attention, it becomes different from the language used day to day. The tourism slogan texts commonly apply different language use which makes people having different personal and contextual interpretation. Then, the writer attempts to study the meanings of the slogan texts based on the figures of speech and speech acts, especially on illocutionary acts. There are three problems of the study: (1) What figures of speech do the tourism advertising slogan texts have? (2) What meanings do figures of speech show in tourism advertising slogan texts? and (3) What illocutionary acts do the slogan texts have in tourism advertising slogans? As a source of data, the writer employed 130 slogan texts taken from Google pages. Since the object of this study was tourism slogan texts, they were taken randomly and not limited to the year of 2010 as the latest ones. Then, this study applied cyclic system which is a system used for corpus data, to analyze all 130 slogan texts by using descriptive qualitative research. The results of the analysis show that there are 14 figures of speech used in tourism advertising slogan texts. From the 14 figures of speech, alliteration and personification become the dominant ones. Next, the meanings of figures of speech can be categorized into five groups, namely to make the slogan memorable, to make the slogan attractive and imaginative, to give characteristic and symbol, to offer experience, and to give modest assertion. Finally, from the data, it is found that assertive act dominates the tourism advertising slogan which functions to highlight the state or the character of the location. As a matter of fact, although the slogans have one act, assertive, they have many kinds of figures of speech on their texts. By studying and analyzing meaning of tourism slogan texts through figures of speech and speech acts, the writer expects people, especially students and teachers, can obtain some information about tourism slogan. They can obtain practical use of speech act and figures of speech in making tourism slogans and implementing those theories with the purpose of promoting the image and attract people‟s attention. The writer also expects teachers to develop the teaching materials both in semantics and pragmatics. Since there is limited information regarding the application of figurative language in promoting image,
Recommended publications
  • POLITENESS: ALWAYS IMPLICATED? Manuel Padilla Cruz

    POLITENESS: ALWAYS IMPLICATED? Manuel Padilla Cruz

    POLITENESS: ALWAYS IMPLICATED? Manuel Padilla Cruz Manuel Padilla Cruz holds a PhD in English Linguistics and is currently an Associate Professor at the Department of English Language (University of Seville). His research interests include cognitive, social, historical, interlanguage and cross-cultural pragmatics. He is a member of the Research Group “Intercultural Pragmatic Studies (English-Spanish): Pragmatic and Discourse Aspects” (P.A.I. HUM 640) and has co- edited the volumes Current Trends in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics (2004) and Studies in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics (in press). Contact information: Manuel Padilla Cruz Departamento de Filología Inglesa (Lengua Inglesa) FACULTAD DE FILOLOGÍA c/ Palos de la Frontera, s/n. 41004 Sevilla Tlfno. : 954 55 15 50 Fax: 954 55 15 16 e-mail: [email protected] POLITENESS: ALWAYS IMPLICATED? Manuel Padilla Cruz Abstract Based on the relevance-theoretic distinction between explicit and implicit communication, and the notion of explicature of an utterance and its different types (Sperber and Wilson, 1986, 1995; Wilson and Sperber, 1993, 2002), this paper argues that (im)politeness may also be communicated explicitly, and not only implicitly as has been normally claimed in the extant literature. The fact that certain linguistic expressions and paralinguistic features have a procedural meaning that does not affect the truth-conditional content of the utterance where they occur but leads the hearer to obtain a propositional-attitude description can be exploited by the speaker in order to communicate her (im)polite attitude explicitly, as part of the explicit content of that utterance. The hearer will in turn rely on such expressions and features so as to recover a description of the speaker’s attitude and, hence, information about (im)politeness.
  • Cohesion, Coherence and Temporal Reference from an Experimental Corpus Pragmatics Perspective Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics

    Cohesion, Coherence and Temporal Reference from an Experimental Corpus Pragmatics Perspective Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics

    Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics Cristina Grisot Cohesion, Coherence and Temporal Reference from an Experimental Corpus Pragmatics Perspective Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics Editor-in-Chief Jesús Romero-Trillo, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain Reviews Editor Dawn Knight, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK Advisory Editorial Board Karin Aijmer, University of Gothenburg, Sweden Belén Díez-Bedmar, Universidad de Jaén, Spain Ronald Geluykens, University of Oldenburg, Germany Anna Gladkova, University of Sussex and University of Brighton, UK Stefan Gries: University of California, Santa Barbara, USA Leo Francis Hoye, University of Hong Kong, China Jingyang Jiang, Zhejiang University, China Anne O’Keefe, Mary Immaculate College, Limerick, Ireland Silvia Riesco-Bernier, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, University of Ghent, Belgium Esther Vázquez y del Árbol, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain Anne Wichmann, University of Central Lancashire, UK More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/11559 Cristina Grisot Cohesion, Coherence and Temporal Reference from an Experimental Corpus Pragmatics Perspective Cristina Grisot Department of Linguistics University of Geneva Geneva 4, Switzerland Published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation ISSN 2213-6819 ISSN 2213-6827 (electronic) Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics ISBN 978-3-319-96751-6 ISBN 978-3-319-96752-3 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96752-3 Library of Congress
  • Rhetoric in Spain 1/2016 EDITORS: NARCÍS IGLÉSIAS and MARIA ZAŁĘSKA

    Rhetoric in Spain 1/2016 EDITORS: NARCÍS IGLÉSIAS and MARIA ZAŁĘSKA

    ISSN: 2392-3113 Rhetoric in Spain 1/2016 EDITORS: NARCÍS IGLÉSIAS AND MARIA ZAŁĘSKA TOMÁS ALBALADEJO AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MADRID [email protected] Cultural Rhetoric. Foundations and perspectives Abstract Cultural rhetoric is proposed as a methodological system to study the relationship between culture and rhetoric and to analyze rhetorical discourses, literary works and texts of other kinds from the point of view of their rhetorical foundations and their perlocutionary force before receivers. It is connected with the cultural dimension of rhetoric and with the rhetorical dimension of culture. It is within the studies in culture, together with semiotics of culture and cultural studies. Key words Rhetoric, Culture, Cultural rhetoric, Discourse, Literature License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Poland. The content of the license is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/pl/ Res Rhetorica, ISSN 2392-3113, 1/2016, p. 17 TOMÁS ALBALADEJO AUTONOMOUS UNIVERSITY OF MADRID [email protected] Cultural Rhetoric. Foundations and perspectives 1. Rhetoric as an art and a discipline. Rhetoric in culture and culture in rhetoric Although rhetoric was born as an instrument to communicate with persuasive aims before courts and it was initially used in the realm of civil law, it entered easily into the fi elds of criminal law and political communication. Rhetoric passed from its native land, Sicily, an island that had been colonized by the Greeks, to Athens, and afterwards from Athens to Rome. Rhetoric is the technique of communication and of oral public discourse that each citizen of these cities who wished to play a public role in society should have learned.
  • The Linguistic Features and Persuasion Techniques in Marlboro Cigarette Advertisement Slogans

    The Linguistic Features and Persuasion Techniques in Marlboro Cigarette Advertisement Slogans

    PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI THE LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND PERSUASION TECHNIQUES IN MARLBORO CIGARETTE ADVERTISEMENT SLOGANS A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education By Astriyani Sulistyowati Student Number: 111214161 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2017 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI THE LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND PERSUASION TECHNIQUES IN MARLBORO CIGARETTE ADVERTISEMENT SLOGANS A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Education By Astriyani Sulistyowati Student Number: 111214161 ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2017 i PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ヽ И Sαげα4α Pθ ″グ′どJttη″Thcsis On THE LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND PERSUAS10N TECHNIQUESIN MARLBORO CIGARETT逸 ADVERTISEMENT SLOGANS By Astriyani Sulistyowati Student Number: 11121416l Approved by Carla Sih Prabandtti,S.Pd.,M.Hum. Date: 10 May 2AI7 ― ― ― PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI DEDICATION PAGE Success is not the key to happiness. Happiness is the key to success. If you love what you are doing, you will be successful. (Herman Cain) If there is no struggle, there is no progress. (Frederick Douglass) We all make mistakes, have struggles, and even regret things in our past. But you’re not your mistakes, you’re not your struggles, and you are here right now with the power to shape your day and your future.
  • Deconstruction and Rhetorical Strategies

    Deconstruction and Rhetorical Strategies

    appendix Deconstruction and Rhetorical Strategies Shared Rhetorical Background Whereas the main differences between the three modes of deconstruction were high- lighted in the concluding chapter, this Appendix draws attention to their most crucial common ground. All the literary strategies that are applied to deconstruct imperial rep- resentation are based on rhetorical strategies. We have seen this implicitly throughout the study; this Appendix will make the rhetorical strategies explicit. It complements the conclusion offered in the last chapter by looking at the results of this study from a strictly rhetorical perspective and by asking which general rhetorical strategies under- lie the techniques of deconstruction analysed in this book (in particular in chapters 4, 7, and 10). Tacitus, Suetonius, and Cassius Dio, who all received rhetorical training and were familiar with the theory and practice of rhetoric, adapt rhetorical measures in vari- ous ways, but the underlying principles—the rhetorical operations—are the same. My analysis of historiographical strategies deployed against Nero and Domitian as rhetorical strategies builds on the branch of scholarship that has shown that Roman historiography cannot be separated from rhetoric.1 The study of connections between historiography and rhetoric most often takes the form of analysing speeches in his- toriographical works. My approach is broader: I read historiography and biography as persuasive genres that aim to make their accounts plausible. Their presentation is also directed against other versions of the same topics and personalities, especially in the form we find them in panegyrical discourse. To achieve plausibility for its own version of Nero and Domitian, historiography draws on genuinely rhetorical devices.
  • Coming to Grips with Life in the Disinformation Age

    Coming to Grips with Life in the Disinformation Age

    Coming to Grips with Life in the Disinformation Age “The Information Age” is the term given to post-World War II contemporary society, particularly from the Sixties, onward, when we were coming to the realization that our ability to publish information of all kinds, fact and fiction, was increasing at an exponential rate so as to make librarians worry that they would soon run out of storage space. Their storage worries were temporarily allayed by the advent of the common use of microform analog photography of printed materials, and eventually further by digital technology and nanotechnology. It is noted that in this era, similar to other past eras of great growth in communications technology such as written language, the printing press, analog recording, and telecommunication, dramatic changes occurred as well in human thinking and socialness. More ready archiving negatively impacted our disposition to remember things by rote, including, in recent times, our own phone numbers. Moreover, many opportunities for routine socializing were lost, particularly those involving public speech and readings, live music and theater, live visits to neighbors and friends, etc. The recognition that there had been a significant tradeoff from which there seemed to be no turning back evoked discussion of how to come to grips with “life in the Information Age”. Perhaps we could discover new social and intellectual opportunities from our technological advances to replace the old ones lost, ways made available by new technology. Today we are facing a new challenge, also brought on largely by new technology: that of coming to grips with life in the “Disinformation Age”.
  • Public Relations: a Guide to Strategic Communication

    Public Relations: a Guide to Strategic Communication

    Public Relations: A Guide to Strategic Communication By Young Joon Lim FIRST EDITION Bassim Hamadeh, CEO and Publisher Kassie Graves, Director of Acquisitions Jamie Giganti, Senior Managing Editor Jess Estrella, Senior Graphic Designer Bob Farrell, Senior Field Acquisitions Editor Gem Rabanera, Project Editor Elizabeth Rowe, Licensing Coordinator Allie Kiekhofer, Associate Editor Kevin Fontimayor, Interior Designer Copyright © 2017 by Cognella, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information retrieval system without the written permission of Cognella, Inc. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Cover image copyright © Copyright © 2015 iStockphoto LP/baona. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-63487-475-5 (pbk) / 978-1-63487-476-2 (br) Contents CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Public Relations 2 Understanding Public Relations 2 Definitions of Public Relations 3 Who Uses Public Relations, and Why? 4 Six Representative Entities of Public Relations Practice Why is Public Relations Promising as an Academic Course? 7 How is Public Relations Processed? 8 ROPE: Research, Objectives, Planning, and Evaluation RACE: Research, Action, Communication, and Evaluation GRACE: Goal, Research, Action, Communication, and Evaluation RPIE: Research, Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation Who are the Essential Publics of Public Relations? 10 What are the Components of Public Relations? 11 What are the Stereotypes or Misperceptions about Public Relations? 11 How Does Public Relations Differ from Other Similar Fields of Practice? 12 Advertising vs.
  • Using Science As Evidence in Public Policy

    Using Science As Evidence in Public Policy

    Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy Committee on the Use of Social Science Knowledge in Public Policy Kenneth Prewitt, Thomas A. Schwandt, and Miron L. Straf, Editors Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by Contract No. SES-0630359 between the National Acad- emy of Sciences and the National Science Foundation; by Contract No. 7275 with the William T. Grant Foundation; by Contract No. 2006-7875 with the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; and by Contract No. 20070001 with the Spencer Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-26161-6 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-26161-9 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334- 3313; http://www.nap.edu.
  • Report, Volume 9

    Report, Volume 9

    Report West Point Undergraduate Historical Review Volume 9 Spring 2019 Report West Point Undergraduate Historical Review Volume 9 Spring 2019 Report, 1 Report West Point Undergraduate Historical Review Volume 9, Spring 2019 Editors Daniel Berardino (2020) Editor-in-Chief Military History Helen Burleigh (2019) Assistant Editor International History Morgan Conrow (2019) American History Gregory Brookover (2020) Military History Andrew Carter (2020) Military History Mike Avallone (2020) American History Collin Keogh (2021) American History Brandi Braggs (2021) American History Cameron Hay (2021) American History Report, 2 Copyright and photocopying © 2019 Department of History United States Military Academy West Point, New York 10996 Acknowledgments The Editorial Board would like to thank the faculty of the History Department for their submission recommendations, all the students who submitted papers, and Captain Alexander Humes for his advice and guidance on historical scholarship. Without their help, Report would not have been possible. About The Review Report is a non-profit publication produced by undergraduate cadets at the United States Military Academy. It accepts and encourages submissions from undergraduates in the fall and spring. Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited. On The Internet https://www.usma.edu/academics/academic- departments/history/history-journal Disclaimer The contents of Report, including words, images, and opinions, are unofficial and are not to be considered as the official views of the United States Military Academy, the United States Army, or the Department of Defense. Readers accept and agree to this disclaimer in the use of any information obtained from Report. Report, 3 Letter from The Editor Dear Reader, This year the Report editorial staff is pleased to present the spring edition of our journal.
  • An Analysis of American Propaganda in World War II and the Vietnam War Connor Foley

    An Analysis of American Propaganda in World War II and the Vietnam War Connor Foley

    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 5-12-2015 An Analysis of American Propaganda in World War II and the Vietnam War Connor Foley Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Foley, Connor. (2015). An Analysis of American Propaganda in World War II and the Vietnam War. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 90. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/90 Copyright © 2015 Connor Foley This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. An Analysis of American Propaganda in World War II and the Vietnam War Connor Foley Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Commonwealth Honors in History Bridgewater State University May 12, 2015 Dr. Paul Rubinson, Thesis Director Dr. Leonid Heretz, Committee Member Dr. Thomas Nester, Committee Member Foley 1 Introduction The history of the United States is riddled with military engagements and warfare. From the inception of this country to the present day, the world knows the United States as a militaristic power. The 20th century was a particularly tumultuous time in which the United States participated in many military conflicts including World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Persian Gulf War, and several other smaller or unofficial engagements. The use of propaganda acts as a common thread that ties all these military actions together. Countries rely on propaganda during wartime for a variety of reasons.
  • The Roles of Linguistic Meaning and Context in the Concept of Lying

    The Roles of Linguistic Meaning and Context in the Concept of Lying

    THE ROLES OF LINGUISTIC MEANING AND CONTEXT IN THE CONCEPT OF LYING BY BENJAMIN WEISSMAN DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2019 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Marina Terkourafi, Leiden University, Director Professor Tania Ionin, Chair Professor Peter Lasersohn Adjunct Assistant Professor Darren Tanner ii ABSTRACT This dissertation adopts an experimental approach to studying lie judgments. It focuses on lie judgments to different types of meaning within a pragmatic framework – namely bare linguistic meaning, explicature, and implicature – to study whether the (in)directness of communicated false content affects the extent to which an utterance is judged as a lie. In addition, it manipulates several contextual factors – namely the genre of discourse, pre-existing biases towards the speaker, the speaker’s intention to deceive, and the stakes of the situation – to investigate the extent to which these extralinguistic contextual factors affect lie judgments as well. Lastly, the project includes a reaction time experiment designed to investigate the mental representations of the categories of lie and mislead and how false explicatures and false implicatures are categorized. In exploring the variability in lie judgments, I gather evidence that support amendments to the discussion of lie judgments in the linguistic literature and additionally draw conclusions relevant to the broader discussion of frameworks of linguistic meaning. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing graduate school would not have been possible without the love and support from my parents, Susan Pasternack and Fred Weissman. I owe them immense thanks for their support throughout the years.
  • János S. Petőfi's Linguistic and Textual Theory and the Recovery of The

    János S. Petőfi's Linguistic and Textual Theory and the Recovery of The

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante Francisco Chico Rico, “János S. Petőfi’s Linguistic and Textual Theory and the Recovery of the Historical Thinking about Rhetoric”. In: Margarita Borreguero Zuloaga and Luciano Vitacolonna (eds.), The Legacy of János S. Petőfi: Text Linguistics, Literary Theory and Semiotics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019: 110-131 (ISBN: 978- 1-5275-2310-4). János S. Petőfi’s linguistic and textual theory and the recovery of the historical thinking about Rhetoric Francisco Chico Rico (University of Alicante, Spain) Abstract The present paper carries out a study about the possibilities of mutual enrichment resulting from the interrelationship of the Text-Structure World-Structure Theory (TeSWeST, from the German “Text-Struktur Welt-Struktur Theorie”) by János S. Petőfi and the rhetorical model, that is, the explanatory system for the construction and communication of rhetorical discourse within the framework of the so-called rhetorica recepta, traditionally formed by the operations —partes artis or oratoris officia— of inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria and actio/pronuntiatio. More specifically, our aim is, on the one hand, to account for the enrichment of TeSWeST from the examination of rhetorical elocutio —an enrichment which also leads us to the need for a redefinition of the traditional rhetorical operations in the light of the components and categories of TeSWeST; and on the other, to try and explain the enrichment of the traditional rhetorical system through the recovery of the rhetorical operation of intellectio —from the review of historic texts dealing with rhetorical theory, such as Institutiones oratorias, by Sulpitius Victor, and De rhetorica liber, by Aurelius Augustinus.