Groundwater Interception Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Groundwater Interception Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay Groundwater Interception Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay October 2004 Report prepared by: Avifauna Research & Services Avifauna Research & Services Groundwater Interception - Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay Contents Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………….. 1 Shorebird habitat at Penrhyn Estuary and Foreshore Beach ……………………………… 2 Availability of prey ………………………………………………………………………. 4 Changes in groundwater flows 4 Changes to invertebrate populations ………………………………………………………4 Changes to saltmarsh communities ………………………………………………………. 5 Likelihood of impact ………………………………………………………………………4 Avifauna Research & Services ii Groundwater Interception - Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay Executive Summary Shorebird species that were once abundant in the north of Botany Bay have declined over the past 60 years as a result of habitat loss and are now restricted to a small area of intertidal habitat at Penrhyn Estuary. Most shorebird species feed on invertebrates found in tidal mud and sand flats on the falling tide and to a lesser extent on the rising tide. During high tide when feeding habitat is covered shorebirds roost (rest) at suitable locations. Little is known about the influence on invertebrates as a result of alterations to groundwater flows, and therefore indirect impacts on shorebird populations, however it is likely that species diversity and abundance will change with changes in salinity. Any changes to the number of invertebrates or species composition of invertebrates at Penrhyn Estuary may have an effect on shorebirds in the estuary, however it is known that shorebirds are readily able to switch prey due to their migratory nature. Invertebrate populations are currently under severe stress as a result of contaminants in the mudflats at Penrhyn Estuary. The proposed groundwater interception will reduce the risk of further contamination and risk to the estuary and its fauna and flora allowing the levels of contaminants to decline over time. Roost sites used by shorebirds are usually areas that have an open aspect to allow an all-round view for potential predators either saltmarsh habitat with low vegetation or open sand spits or beaches. The level at which saltmarsh grows depends on a number of factors including tide heights and freshwater runoff, including groundwater flows. Cessation of groundwater flows may result in a change in saltmarsh distribution, influenced by tide heights alone. The proposed expansion of Port Botany will to some extent override the effect of groundwater interception in that that proposal includes the establishment of additional saltmarsh habitat, much larger than the that currently existing. If the port expansion proceeds the remediation measures planned by SPC would complement those of Orica in providing and improved roosting and foraging habitat for migratory and non-migratory shorebirds within the estuary. Foreshore Beach currently provides very little shorebird feeding habitat. However the proposed port expansion would result a modification of the beach and protection from wave action. This is likely to increase the area of shorebird feeding habitat if the slope of the beach is lowered. This would also be compatible with the Proposal by Orica, providing a wider area of tidal flats and minimising the effect of groundwater interception. Key issues The retention of the existing mudflats at Penrhyn Estuary is essential to the long-term survival of shorebirds currently using the site. Actions to prevent toxic chemicals entering the estuary should be taken to protect shorebirds, their habitats and prey at the earliest opportunity. Regular, monthly, monitoring of the site will be essential to determine in any changes to the nature of the foreshore as a result of the proposal. Although it is likely that invertebrate populations and saltmarsh would adjust, it may be advantageous to carry out landscaping, Avifauna Research & Services 1 Groundwater Interception - Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay including the addition of appropriate soils to enhance and expand the area of saltmarsh and therefore shorebird habitat. Recent successes in the establishment or enhancement of saltmarshes in Sydney have clearly demonstrated the feasibility to manage saltmarsh in modified habitat. Ongoing management of the site may be necessary to prevent invasion shorebird habitat by mangroves including the ‘weeding’ of mangrove seedlings on an annual basis. Avifauna Research & Services 2 Groundwater Interception - Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay Shorebird habitat at Penrhyn Estuary Since the 1940s the gradual loss of shorebird habitat has resulted in a substantial decline in the numbers of shorebirds found in the northern part of Botany Bay. Penrhyn Estuary now provides the only shorebird feeding habitat and roosting sites in the north of the Bay. Although shorebird habitat exists along the southern shores of the bay it is not suitable for most of the shorebirds found at Penrhyn Estuary. Twenty four species of resident and migratory shorebirds and seabirds, listed under the Threatened Species Conservation Act (TSC Act) and/or the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC Act), are known to occur or have previously been recorded at Penrhyn Estuary. Of these seven are listed as Vulnerable and one, the Little Tern, as Endangered under the TSC Act, 22 are listed under international agreements (JAMBA and CAMBA) and 23 under the Bonn Convention of Migratory Animals (see Table 1). The most productive shorebird feeding habitat appears to be the silts in the delta area formed by Springvale and Floodvale Creeks as shown clearly in the airphoto taken at low tide (Figure 1). Figure 1. Penrhyn Estuary at low tide showing silt deltas formed by Springvale and Floodvale Creeks Shorebirds feed almost exclusively on invertebrates found in the substrate of wetlands, especially coastal estuaries. These habitats provide exposed mudflats in a relatively sheltered environment. Estuarine habitats are complex and rely on river flows, daily tidal cycles, groundwater runoff and the presence of organic material which support invertebrate populations. Although groundwater plays an important role in the formation and health of some saltmarsh plant communities it is not known how important groundwater is to maintaining Avifauna Research & Services 3 Groundwater Interception - Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay invertebrate populations on tidal mudflats given that frequent freshwater flows occur at Penrhyn Estuary from surface runoff of local catchments. A reduction in groundwater flows into Penrhyn Estuary is likely to result in the change in species composition and numbers of some invertebrates. However it is known that shorebirds are readily able to switch prey due to migratory nature feeding in a variety of habitats from freshwater bogs to hyper saline saltpans and can adjust to a wide variety of invertebrate prey. Figure 2: Available shorebird feeding habitat at Penrhyn Estuary (outlined in orange) Avifauna Research & Services 4 Groundwater Interception - Potential Impacts on Migratory and Threatened Shorebird Communities in Botany Bay Availability of prey Studies of invertebrate populations at Penrhyn Estuary (The Ecology Lab Pty Ltd 2004, Botany Groundwater Clean-up, Aquatic Ecology Component 18/0405A) have indicated that characteristics indicative of this community include reduced species richness, community structure dominated by a few taxa, a paucity of small crustaceans such as amphipods, dominance of a few families of polychaete worms, and dominance by species with small body size and short life spans that retain (by various means) offspring in the immediate vicinity of parents or within the parental habitat. The current population of shorebirds at Penrhyn Estuary have developed in the presence of the current levels of contaminants in the estuary as well as levels of a level of toxins in the tissues of their prey. Any changes to invertebrate populations could influence the species diversity and population density of shorebirds. Improvement in the level of contaminants in the mudflats at Penrhyn Estuary, through the prevention of further contamination of the site, should in the long term provide a healthier environment for shorebirds by improving the diversity and health of their invertebrate prey. The effect of groundwater interception on invertebrates cannot be determined specifically (The Ecology Lab Pty Ltd 2004, Botany Groundwater Clean-up, Aquatic Ecology Component 18/0405A) but may result in a change in species composition. Any such changes may require a switch in prey species by shorebirds, provided the density of available prey is not reduced on the whole, most shorebird species should be able to adapt to these. Changes in groundwater flows The effects of changes to groundwater flows into the estuary as a result of works carried out by Orica are not likely to have any direct impacts on shorebirds as these species frequent a variety of habitats of varying salinity levels in the space of a single day. Any impact on shorebirds is likely to be as a result of changes in vegetation composition and prey (i.e. invertebrates) availability addressed elsewhere in this document. Changes to invertebrate populations Invertebrate populations appear
Recommended publications
  • Potentially Useful Beach Nourishment and Associated Studies/Projects – References
    Sand Nourishment Forum – Sand Nourishment Reference list October 2013 Updated from Coasts & Ports Conference, Sydney 2013 Potentially Useful Beach Nourishment and Associated Studies/Projects – References Foreword: The Coasts & Ports 2013 Organising Committee introduced a half- day Sand Nourishment Forum comprising a Questions and Answers format directed to an experienced Panel with audience participation to explore and promote the use of sand nourishment as a viable method for managing short term erosion and long term coastal recession. The Forum emanated from great interest in beach nourishment around Australia, with a long history of successful projects from Adelaide to Noosa and major projects on the Gold Coast. The 2013 Conference was launched with a keynote address from Dr Stefan Aarninkhof who was intricately involved in the Delfland Sand Engine project in the Netherlands, which has introduced 21.5M m3 of offshore sands to the Dutch coast to provide coastal protection and prevent coastal inundation. As a precursor to the Beach Nourishment Forum at the Coast & Ports Conference 2013 in Sydney, A. D. Gordon (Forum Moderator) compiled the following list of reference material with contributions from J.T. Carley, E.D. Couriel, A. L. Jackson, A.R Jones, D.B. Lord, A.F. Nielsen, T.D. Shand, R.B. Tomlinson, T. Stul, R. Tucker. The list is intended to be a start on a “live “ document that can be added to, as further reference material becomes available/unearthed. The list has been compiled to assist those carrying out or contemplating beach nourishment, beach scraping and entrance by-passing or back-passing projects. It is hoped that other special interest topics to the coastal and port engineering profession may be run in similar forums as part of the future Coasts & Ports Conference series.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Storms in Nsw and Their Effect on the Coast
    I I. COASTAL STORMS IN N.s.w. .: AUGUST & NOVEMBER 1986 .1 and Their Effect on the Coast I 'I I 1'1 ! I I I I I I I I I I , . < May 198,8 , 'I " I I : COASTAL STORMS· IN N.s.w. I AUGUST & NOVEMBER 1986 I and Their Effect on the Coast I I I I I 1: 1 I I I I I M.N. CLARKE M.G. GEARY I Chief Engineer Principal Engineer I Prepared by : University of N.S.W. Water Research Laboratory I bID IPTIID311IIcr: ~Th'¥@~ , I May 1988 ------..! Coaat a Rivera Branch I I I I CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ( ii ) I LIST OF TABLES (iv) 1. INTRODUCTION I 2. SUMMARY 2 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 5 I 3.1 METEOROLOGICAL DATA 5 3.2 TIDE LEVELS 7 3.3 WAVE HEIGHTS AND PERIODS 10 I 3.4 STORM mSTORY - AUGUST 1985 TO AUGUST 1986 13 4. WAVE RUN-UP 15 I 4.1 MANLY WARRINGAH BEACHES 15 4.2 BATEMANS BAY BEACHES 15 I 4.3 THEORETICAL ASSESSMENT 16 4.4 COMPARISON OF MEASURED AND THEORETICAL RUN-UP LEVELS 23 5. BEACH SURVEYS 25 ·1 5.1 GOSFORD BEACHES 25 5.2 MANLY W ARRINGAH BEACHES 28 I 5.3 BATEMANS BAY BEACHES 29 6. OFFSHORE SURVEYS . 30 6.1 SURVEY METHODS 30 I 6.2 GOSFORD BEACHES 30 6.3 WARRINGAH BEACHES 31 I 6.4 ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY OF OFFSHORE SURVEYS 32 7. OFFSHORE SEDIMENT SAMPLES - GOSFORD BEACHES 34 7.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION 34 I 7.2 SAMPLE CLASSIFICATION 34 , 7.3 SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS 34 I 7.4 COMPARISON OF 1983/84 AND POST STORM OFFSHORE DATA 36 8.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1770 Landscape of Botany Bay, the Plants Collected by Banks and Solander and Rehabilitation of Natural Vegetation at Kurnell
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Hochschulschriftenserver - Universität Frankfurt am Main Backdrop to encounter: the 1770 landscape of Botany Bay, the plants collected by Banks and Solander and rehabilitation of natural vegetation at Kurnell Doug Benson1 and Georgina Eldershaw2 1Botanic Gardens Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd Sydney 2000 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] 2Parks & Wildlife Division, Dept of Environment and Conservation (NSW), PO Box 375 Kurnell NSW 2231 AUSTRALIA email [email protected] Abstract: The first scientific observations on the flora of eastern Australia were made at Botany Bay in April–May 1770. We discuss the landscapes of Botany Bay and particularly of the historic landing place at Kurnell (lat 34˚ 00’ S, long 151˚ 13’ E) (about 16 km south of central Sydney), as described in the journals of Lieutenant James Cook and Joseph Banks on the Endeavour voyage in 1770. We list 132 plant species that were collected at Botany Bay by Banks and Daniel Solander, the first scientific collections of Australian flora. The list is based on a critical assessment of unpublished lists compiled by authors who had access to the collection of the British Museum (now Natural History Museum), together with species from material at National Herbarium of New South Wales that has not been previously available. The list includes Bidens pilosa which has been previously regarded as an introduced species. In 1770 the Europeans set foot on Aboriginal land of the Dharawal people. Since that time the landscape has been altered in response to a succession of different land-uses; farming and grazing, commemorative tree planting, parkland planting, and pleasure ground and tourist visitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 – Strategic Context and Project Need
    Chapter 4 – Strategic context and project need 4 Strategic context and project need 4.1 Current issues with the road network 4.1.1 Traffic congestion across Greater Sydney Traffic growth is forecast across NSW and will include around one million extra road users in Sydney within the next decade and nearly twice the freight movements by 2031. Congestion across metropolitan Sydney is estimated to cost up to $6.1 billion per annum, rising to $12.6 billion by 2030 if nothing is done1. Travel by road is the dominant transport mode in Sydney. Even with high growth in rail freight and public transport, road travel is predicted to continue to be the most dominant travel choice for at least the next 20 years2. Traffic congestion impacts communities and businesses by: • Affecting Sydney’s large and significant freight, service and business operations • Reducing the reliability of, and accessibility to, public transport • Constraining the movement of pedestrians and cyclists • Reducing amenity for nearby residents, pedestrians, cyclists and sensitive land uses (educational and health facilities). 4.1.2 Missing regional motorway link In Sydney’s South District (which includes the Canterbury-Bankstown, Georges River and Sutherland LGAs), over 50 per cent of journeys are undertaken by car. There is currently no motorway between the existing M1 Princes Motorway south of Waterfall and the Sydney motorway network. All local and through traffic, including heavy vehicle traffic, is currently required to use the arterial road network to travel between Waterfall and Sydney, principally the A1 Princes Highway, the A3 King Georges Road and / or the A6 Heathcote Road / New Illawarra Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Georges River Coastal Management Program Scoping Study
    FINAL REPORT: Georges River Coastal Management Program Scoping Study December 2020 Document history Revision: Revision no. 02 Author/s M. Rosenthal M. Sano Checked M. Sano E. Zavadil Approved E. Zavadil Distribution: Revision no. 01a Issue date 18 May 2020 Issued to Peter Ryan (Georges Riverkeeper) Description: Draft for comment Revision no. 02 Issue date 4 December 2020 Issued to Peter Ryan (Georges Riverkeeper) Description: Final Report Citation: Please cite as: Alluvium (2020). Georges River Coastal Management Program Scoping Study. Report by Alluvium for Georges Riverkeeper. December 2020. Acknowledgement: Alluvium acknowledges the Traditional Owners and custodians of the lands on which we work. The sites assessed are on the lands of the Dharug and Dharawal People, and we acknowledge them as Traditional Owners. We pay our respects to their elders, and the elders of all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, past, present, and into the future. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Scoping study purpose 1 1.2 Study area 1 1.3 Report structure 6 2 Program context 7 2.1 NSW Coastal Management Framework 7 2.2 Coastal Management Programs 8 3 Strategic context 11 3.1 Physical setting 12 3.1.1 Landscape context, geology and soils 12 3.1.2 Coastal processes, sediment supply and transport 14 3.1.3 Coastal hazards 17 3.1.4 Shoreline management 20 3.2 Hydrology and hydrodynamics 24 3.2.1 Catchment hydrology 24 3.2.2 Groundwater 24 3.2.3 Hydrodynamics 25 3.2.4 Tides 26 3.2.5 Flooding 26 3.3 Climate 27 3.3.1 Current climate 27 3.3.2 Past observations
    [Show full text]
  • Beach and Foreshore Monitoring Program, Botany Bay Sector
    BEACH AND FORESHORE MONITORING PROGRAM BOTANY BAY SECTOR WDA-E-REP-012 Rev 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................................................4 2 SCOPE ..................................................................................................................... 5 3 DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................... 6 4 PLAN COMPLIANCE AND CONTROL.................................................................... 7 4.1 Document Control and Records Management ..............................................................................7 4.2 Compliance .......................................................................................................................................7 4.3 Plan Quality and Control..................................................................................................................7 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................................................................................ 8 5.1 Environmental Management System Overview ............................................................................8 5.2 Background.......................................................................................................................................9 5.3 Stakeholder Consultation................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Beaches 2017-18: Sydney Region
    OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENT & HERITAGE State of the beaches 2017-2018 Sydney region Beachwatch www.environment.nsw.gov.au/beachwatch © 2018 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2018. Cover image: South Cronulla
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Australia Botany Bay Cable Project Modification Application: Application Number: 06 0284 MOD 1
    SYDNEY COASTAL COUNCILS GROUP Inc. C/- City of Sydney Council Level 14, 456 Kent Street GPO Box 1591, SYDNEY NSW 2001 Phone: (02) 9246 7791 Facsimile: (02) 9265 9660 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.sydneycoastalcouncils.com.au www.sydneycoastalcouncils.com.au ABN:Critical Infrastructure39 638 876 and538 Special Projects CM021-09 Department of Planning GPO Box 39 Sydney NSW 2001 cc. Mr. Peter Fitzgerald, General Manager, City of Botany Bay Council Mr. Chris Watson, General Manager, Rockdale City Council Mr. John Rayner, General Manager, Sutherland Shire Council 20 April 2009 Re: Energy Australia Botany Bay Cable Project Modification Application: Application Number: 06_0284 MOD 1 The Sydney Coastal Councils Group (SCCG) would like to take this opportunity to provide comment on the Energy Australia Botany Bay Cable Project Modification Application: Application Number: 06_0284 MOD 1. The SCCG understands that Energy Australia has submitted a modification request for the Botany Bay Cable Project, seeking approval to undertake dredging works within Botany Bay prior to the commencement of cable laying. This modification would enable the electricity cable to be laid at a sufficient depth that would not conflict with planned future shipping channel dredging works in the Bay by Sydney Ports Corporation. In the event the Botany Bay Cable Project modification is approved, this submission contains a request that the NSW Department of Planning place the appropriate conditions of consent on the modified approval to address the following issues: Water Quality Impacts; Coastal Processes; and Aquatic Ecology Water Quality Impacts The potential for the proposal to have a significant negative impact on water quality due to increased turbidity caused by sediment mobilisation is noted in the Environmental Assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review and Synthesis of Australian Fisheries Habitat
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45256642 A Review and Synthesis of Australian Fisheries Habitat Research, Major Threats, Issues and Gaps in Knowledge of Coastal and Marine Fisheries Habitats - A Prospectus of Opportunitie... Article · January 1998 Source: OAI CITATIONS READS 24 244 4 authors, including: Daniel M. Alongi Norman C Duke Tropical Coastal & Mangrove Consultants James Cook University 217 PUBLICATIONS 15,835 CITATIONS 265 PUBLICATIONS 14,165 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: MangroveWatch - community science in action View project Large-scale dieback of mangroves in Australia's Gulf of Carpentaria: a severe ecosystem response, coincidental with an unusually extreme weather event View project All content following this page was uploaded by Norman C Duke on 14 December 2013. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS OF AUSTRALIAN FISHERIES HABITAT RESEARCH MAJOR THREATS, ISSUES AND GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE OF COASTAL AND MARINE FISHERIES HABITATS - A PROSPECTUS OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE FRDC “ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION PROGRAM” VOLUME 2: SCOPING REVIEW Mike Cappo, Daniel M. Alongi, David McB. Williams and Norman Duke PRODUCED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FISHERIES RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FRDC 95/055 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE FEBRUARY 1998 Contents ISSUE 1: NATURAL DYNAMICS IN FISHERIES HABITATS AND ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY 13
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Sand Nourishment Scoping Study
    Prepared for 18 February 2010 Sydney Coastal Councils Group Inc. Beach Sand Nourishment Scoping Study Maintaining Sydney’s Beach Amenity Against Climate Change Sea Level Rise Beach Sand Nourishment Scoping Study - Maintaining Sydney's Beach Amenity Against Climate Change Sea Level Rise AECOM Beach Sand Nourishment Scoping Study Maintaining Sydney's Beach Amenity Against Climate Change Sea Level Rise Prepared for Sydney Coastal Councils Group Inc. Prepared by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd Level 11, 44 Market Street, Sydney NSW 2000, PO Box Q410, QVB Post Office NSW 1230, Australia T +61 2 8295 3600 F +61 2 9262 5060 www.aecom.com ABN 20 093 846 925 18 February 2010 60097867 © AECOM Australia Pty Ltd 2010 The information contained in this document produced by AECOM Australia Pty Ltd is solely for the use of the Client identified on the cover sheet for the purpose for which it has been prepared and AECOM Australia Pty Ltd undertakes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. All rights reserved. No section or element of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of AECOM Australia Pty Ltd. Revision C - 18 February 2010 22 Beach Sand Nourishment Scoping Study - Maintaining Sydney's Beach Amenity Against Climate Change Sea Level Rise AECOM Quality Information Document Beach Sand Nourishment Scoping Study Ref 60097867 Date 18 February 2010 James Walker, Thomas Pinzone, Jasvinder Opkar, Leonid Bronfentrinker,
    [Show full text]
  • Best Beaches for KIDS
    SYDNEY’S Best Beaches FOR KIDS Seana Smith All the information you need for a fantastic visit to Sydney’s most family- friendly beaches, baths, and ocean pools Sydney’s Best Beaches for Kids By Seana Smith Find photographs and maps of many of these beautiful spots on my website: www.seanasmith.com 2 SYDNEY’S BEST BEACHES FOR KIDS © Seana Smith 2012 All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any purpose other than personal use. Therefore, reproduction, modification, storage in a retrieval system or retransmission, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, for reasons other than personal use, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission. 3 Contents Introduction 6 Useful Websites + Safety Information 8 North of the Harbour 9 Palm Beach 9 Whale Beach 10 Avalon Beach 11 Collaroy Beach 14 Dee Why Beach 15 South Curl Curl Beach 16 Freshwater Beach 17 Manly Beach 18 Shelly Beach 19 Pittwater Beaches Paradise Beach 12 Clareville Beach 13 Harbour Beaches Little Manly Cove 20 Forty Baskets Beach 21 Castle Rock Beach 22 Clontarf Beach 23 Balmoral Beach 24 Clifton Gardens 26 Northbridge Baths 27 MacCallum Pool 28 Greenwich Baths 29 Dawn Fraser Pool 30 Seven Shillings Beach and Redleaf Pool 31 Shark Beach 32 Parsley Bay 33 Watsons Bay Baths 34 Eastern Suburbs Beaches Bondi Beach 35 Tamarama 36 Bronte Beach 37 Clovelly Beach and Baths 38 Coogee Beach 39 Wylies Baths 40 Frenchmans Bay Beach 41 Southern Beaches Kyeemagh Baths 42 Dolls Point Baths 43 Carss Park Baths 44 Como Baths 45 South Cronulla Beach 46 Shelly Beach and Baths 47 Gunnamatta Beach and Baths 48 5 SYDNEY’S BEST BEACHES FOR KIDS BEST BEACHES, BATHS and OCEAN POOLS trip to the beach without children is an entirely different A experience from a trip to the beach with your own personal nippers in tow.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Research Laboratory School Of
    James holds a Master of Engineering Science degree in Coastal and Water Engineering and has over 22 years experience in coastal and water engineering. James has served on the NSW Coasts Oceans and Port Engineerig Panel (COPEP) of Engineers Australia since 2000, and chaired the panel from 2007 to 2008. Prior to WRL, James worked in the construction industry, including construction and estimating experience for a civil/marine contractor. He has been a surfer and surf life saver for over 30 years. In his time at WRL, James has specialised in coastal proceeses, coastal hazards and their management, and coastal structures. He has undertaken research and provided specialist consulting advice on projects ranging from simple boatsheds to billion dollar ports. His coastal structure experience ranges from conventional rock and concrete structures such as seawalls and breakwaters, to surfing reefs and offshore breakwaters, and structures made from car tyres and geotextiles. Geographically, James has undertaken coastal projects in all states and territories of Australia, New Zealand, the South Pacific, Middle East and South East Asia. Applied research led by James in the areas of geotextile coastal structures and beach erosion has been widely used by practising coastal engineers in Australia and New Zealand. Pioneering work on coastal hazard and climate assessment led by James has been used as a template for other sites in Australia. James is frequently engaged as a fair and balanced peer reviewer. James is regluarly consulted by government for policy advice on coastal hazard identification and management. He has acted as an expert witness in numerous legal proceedings and has regularly presented complex technical information in community and government forums.
    [Show full text]