DOCSLIB.ORG

MCI Interim Financial Statement, June 30Th 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MCI Interim Financial Statement, June 30Th 2017 okt.22 Municipality Credit Iceland Translation of condensed Interim Financial Statements for the period 1 January through 30 June 2017 This condensed interim financial statements are translated from the original which is in Icelandic. Should there be discrepancies between the two versions, the Icelandic version will take priority over the translated version. Index Page Report of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director .................................................................................... 2 Independent Auditor's Report ................................................................................................................................... 3 Income Statement and Statement of Comprehensive Income .................................................................................. 4 Statement of Financial Position ................................................................................................................................ 5 Statement of Changes in Equity ................................................................................................................................ 6 Statement of Cash Flows .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Notes to the Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................ 8-24 Municipality Credit Iceland Plc. Identity number 580407-1100 Borgartun 30, P.O. Box 8100 128 Reykjavik Report of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director Municipality Credit Iceland Plc. (MCI) is a statutory limited liability company owned by the Icelandic municipalities. MCI is a financial institution, and operates pursuant to Act no. 1450/2006 on the incorporation of Municipality Credit Iceland as a statutory limited liability company; Act No. 161/2002 on Financial undertakings; cf. The Companies Act No. 2/1995 and is supervised by the Icelandic Financial Supervisor. MCI´s main function is to secure favorable funding to the municipalities and related organisations and enterprises. MCI is by law only allowed to fund municipal projects that are of general economic interest. MCI had three employees at period end, the same as in the year before. Operating results and financial position The profit for the period amounted to ISK 432 million, as compared to ISK 700 million the same period previous year. Total assets at the end of the period amounted to ISK 77.007 million, as compared to ISK 78.024 million the previous year. Total outstanding loans amounted to ISK 69.179 (at the end of the period as) compared to 71.175 the previous year. Shareholder equity amounted to ISK 17.114 million as compared to ISK 17.172 million at year end 2016 which is a decrease of 0,3% during the period. Dividend of ISK 491 million was paid out to shareholders in the period. The CAD ratio, based on Basel II, was 99% at period end and increased from 85% at year end 2016. MCI is owned by the 74 municipalities in Iceland. Reykjavik city holds 17.5% share and is the only shareholder with a total share above 10%. The ten largest shareholders hold in total 56% of the company´s shares. A detailed shareholder list can be found in note 27. MCI´s Governance MCI´s board of directors aim to maintain good corporate governance and to follow "Management governance directions for public companies" published in 2015 by Iceland Chamber of Commerce, Nasdaq Iceland and SA-Confederation of Icelandic employers. In March 2013 The Center of Corporate Governance provided MCI with a certification as Exemplary company in corporate governance. This certification was updated in March 2016. Further information can be found in the Annual Report. Statement The interim financial statements for the period ending 30 June 2017 have been, to the best knowledge of the board of directors, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the EU and additional Icelandic disclosure requirements in Act No. 3/2006. According to our best knowledge it is our opinion that the interim financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial performance of MCI for the period of 1 January through 30 June 2017, its assets, liabilities and financial position at end of the period. The Board of Directors of Municipality Credit Iceland and the Managing Director hereby confirm the interim financial statements on 30 June 2017 with their signatures. Reykjavik, 23 August 2017 Magnús B. Jónsson Chairman Arna Lára Jónsdóttir Kristinn Jónasson Elliði Vignisson Helga Benediktsdóttir Óttar Guðjónsson Managing Director MCI Plc. Interim Financial Statement 1 January - 30 June 2017 2 Report on Review of Interim Financial Information To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Municipality Credit Iceland LLC. Introduction We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance sheet of Municipality Credit Iceland LLC. as of 30 June 2017 and the related condensed consolidated statements of report of the board of directors, income, changes in equity and cash flows for the six-month period then ended. Management is responsible for the preparation and presentation of this condensed consolidated interim financial information in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34, "Interim Financial Reporting". Our responsibility is to express a conclusion on this interim financial information based on our review. Scope of Review We conducted our review in accordance with International Standards on Review Engagements 2410, "Review of Interim Financial Information Performed by the Independent Auditor of the Entity". A review of interim financial information consists of making inquiries, primarily of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters, and applying analytical and other review procedures. A review is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with International Standards on Auditing and consequently does not enable us to obtain assurance that we would become aware of all significant matters that might be identified in an audit. Accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion. Conclusion Based on our review, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the accompanying condensed interim financial information is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with International Accounting Standard 34 "Interim Financial Reporting". Reykjavik, 23 August 2017 PricewaterhouseCoopers ehf Arna G. Tryggvadóttir CPA MCI Plc. Interim Financial Statement 1 January - 30 June 2017 3 Income Statement and Statement of Comprehensive Income 1 January through 30 June 2017 2017 2016 Notes 1.1.-30.06. 1.1.-30.06. Net interest income Interest income and CPI linked revenue ......................................... 2.222.615.253 2.409.909.470 Interest expenses and CPI linked expenses ................................... (1.705.491.545) (1.877.277.366) Total net interest income 5 517.123.708 532.632.104 Other operating income Net gain on fin. assets designated at FV through P&L ................... 6 14.363.120 11.446.515 Net foreign exchange (loss) gain .................................................... 7 (11.136.370) (5.795.231) Total other operating income 3.226.750 5.651.284 Net operating income 520.350.458 538.283.388 Operating expenses Salaries and related expenses ........................................................ 8 38.448.564 47.049.093 Cost of bond issuance ..................................................................... 9 22.199.993 22.704.256 FSA's annual fee and monitoring fee .............................................. 5.750.000 4.904.000 Other operating expenses ............................................................... 10 23.923.786 28.909.252 Depreciation .................................................................................... 17 597.811 597.814 Total operating expenses 90.920.154 104.164.415 Income from bankrupt financial institutions ..................................... 16 2.871.460 265.677.517 Profit for the period and comprehensive income 432.301.764 699.796.490 Earnings per share Basic and diluted earnings per share .............................................. 11 0,09 0,14 MCI Plc. Interim Financial Statement 1 January - 30 June 2017 4 Statement of financial position 30 June 2017 Notes 30.6.2017 31.12.2016 Assets Cash and term deposits with Central bank ..................................... 12 7.220.208.335 5.626.071.452 Cash deposits with credit institutions .............................................. 13 261.078.810 249.936.916 Loans and receivables .................................................................... 14 69.139.349.134 70.510.956.942 Short term loans .............................................................................. 15 40.126.667 663.848.611 Fin. assets designated at fair value through profit or loss ............... 16,18 300.171.031 927.919.306 Property, plant and equipment ........................................................ 17 43.640.401 44.238.212 Other assets .................................................................................... 2.434.850 1.205.704 Total assets 77.007.009.228 78.024.177.143 Liabilities Debt securities in issue ................................................................... 19 56.949.012.426 57.058.760.797 Other borrowed funds ...................................................................... 20 2.275.638.223 3.175.802.373 Short term borrowings
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jörð Sveitarfélag Nafn Á Samningi Heimilisfang AUSTURLAND Arnheiðarstaðir Múlaþing Eiríkur J
    Jörð Sveitarfélag Nafn á samningi Heimilisfang AUSTURLAND Arnheiðarstaðir Múlaþing Eiríkur J. Kjerúlf Arnheiðarstaðir 701 Egilsstaðir Arnhólsstaðir Múlaþing Anna Lóa Sveinsdóttir Arnhólsstaðir, 701 Egilsstaðir Árteigur Múlaþing Kristján Guðþórsson Ásbrún 1, 700 Egilsstaðir Ás 1 Múlaþing Brynjólfur Guttormsson Bjarkasel 3, 700 Egilsstaðir Ásgarður Múlaþing Viðar Eiríksson Ásgarður 701 Egilsstaður Ásgeirsstaðir Múlaþing Guðrún Jónsdóttir Ásgeirsstöðum 701 Egilsstöðum Bessastaðir Fljótsdalshreppur Andrés H. Einarsson Laugavellir 4, 700 Egilsstaðir Birnufell Múlaþing Þórhalla Sigmundsdóttir Birnufelli, 701 Egilsstaðir Bláeyri Múlaþing Guttormur Sigurjónsson Fjóluhvammi 1, 700 Egilsstaðir Borg Múlaþing Draumalandið ehf./Þóra Borg, 701 Egilsstaðir Bragðavellir Múlaþing Ragnar Eiðsson/Þórunnborg Jónsdóttir Bragðavellir I, 765 Djúpavogi Breiðavað Múlaþing Jóhann G. Jóhannsson/Ólöf Ólafsdóttir Breiðavað 701 Egilsstaðir Brekka Múlaþing Stefán Jónasson Sólvellir 13, 700 Egilsstaðir Brekkuborg Fjarðabyggð Kristján Beekman Brekkuborg 760 Breiðdalsvík Brekkugerði Fljótsdalshreppur Jóhann F. Þórhallsson/Sigrún E. Ólafsdóttir Brekkugerði 701 Egilsstaðir Brekkugerðishús Fljótsdalshreppur Skáldahús ehf. Laugalæk 20, 105 Reykjavík Brekkusel Múlaþing Guðmundur Aðalsteinsson Norðurtúni 12, 700 Egilsstaðir Brú 2 Múlaþing Stefán Halldórsson Ranavað 7, 700 Egilsstöðum Dagverðargerði Múlaþing Pétur Stefánsson Markarflöt 24, 210 Garðabær Davíðsstaðir Múlaþing Davíðsstaðir ehf. Koltröð 24, 700 Egilsstaðir Dratthalastaðir Múlaþing Örvar Már Jónsson Háteigi 691 Vopnafjörður
    [Show full text]
  • Strætó.Is Bus.Is
    HÓLMAVÍK AKUREYRI REYKHOLT Melahverfi Akranes - Akratorg STYKKISHÓLMUR Akranes - Kirkjubraut Akranes - Þjóðbraut Borgarnes - N1 Akranes - Bæjarskrifstofur Kjalarnes - Kjalarnes - Kjalarnes - Akranes - Garðabraut Esjuskáli Esjugrund Klébergsskóli Akranes - Jaðarsbakki Akranes - Bresaflöt Esjurætur Skeljatangi Arnartangi STRÆTÓ.IS Þverholt Skei›holt Kelduskóli/Korpa Korpúlfssta›ir Bollatangi Brekkutangi Esjumelar Brúnasta›ir Bakkasta›ir Klapparhlí› FMOS Varmárskóli Leirvogstunga Skálatún Tröllaborgir Vættaborgir Jötnaborgir Strætóvegur Bar›asta›ir HÁHOLT v/Vættaborgir Mosavegur Goðaborgir Hulduborgir Borgarholtsskóli Kelduskóli/Vík Dofraborgir Go›aborgir Ásland Tjaldanes Mosfell Lundur Skólavegur Laufengi Egilshöll Borgavegur Dvergaborgir SPÖNG Jónsteigur Skarfagar›ar Kænugar›ar Borgavegur Borgavegur Úlfarsbraut SkyggnistorgSkyggnisbraut Úlfarsá Sundagar›ar Hé›insgata Hrafnista Hjallavegur Sægar›ar Víkurvegur Völuteigur Dalbraut Gullengi Mosarimi Lyngrimi Lambhagav./Mímisbrunnur Úlfarsbraut Fiskisló› Laugarnestangi Mi›gar›ur Keldnaholt Reykjalundur Lambhagav./Reynisvatnsvegur Fellsvegur Dælustö›varvegur Kirkjusandur Kirkjusandur Flétturimi Grunnsló› Höf›atorg Nóatún Hótel Cabin Borgartún Sund Holtagar›ar Hallsvegur Húsasmi›jan Reynisvatn Reykjabyggð LaugardalslaugLaugarásvegur Hrafnista Dragavegur Rimaflöt Gufunesbær Þúsöld Biskupsgata Hólsvegur Hólsvegur Dalhús Vallarhús BrekkuhúsVölundarhús Grandagar›ur Tún Teigar Gagnvegur Fíladelfía Hátún Laugardalshöll Lei›hamrar Vegghamrar Grandi LÆKJARTORG Harpa HLEMMUR MaríubaugurIngunnarskóliPrestastígur
    [Show full text]
  • List of Municipalities of Iceland
    Population Area SNo Name Number Region (1 January 2 Mayor/Manager Party 2013) (km ) Capital Jon Gnarr 1 Reykjavikurborg 0000 119,764 273 Best Party Region Kristinsson Capital Armann Kristinn Independence 2 Kopavogsbaer 1000 31,726 80 Region Olafsson Party Capital Asgerour Independence 3 Seltjarnarneskaupstaour 1100 4,322 2 Region Halldorsdottir Party Capital Independence 4 Garoabaer 1300 13,872 76 Gunnar Einarsson Region Party Capital Guorun Agusta Left-Green 5 Hafnarfjaroarkaupstaour 1400 26,808 143 Region Guomundsdottir Movement Capital Independence 6 Mosfellsbaer 1604 8,978 185 Haraldur Sverrisson Region Party Capital Guomundur H. 7 Kjosarhreppur 1606 205 284 Region Daviosson Southern Independence 8 Reykjanesbaer 2000 14,231 145 Arni Sigfusson Peninsula Party Southern 9 Grindavikurbaer 2300 2,860 425 Robert Ragnarsson independent Peninsula Southern 10 Sandgeroisbaer 2503 1,581 62 Sigrun Arnadottir independent Peninsula Southern 11 Sveitarfelagio Garour 2504 1,429 21 Magnus Stefansson Progressive Party Peninsula Southern 12 Sveitarfelagio Vogar 2506 1,105 165 Asgeir Eiriksson independent Peninsula Western Regina 13 Akraneskaupstaour 3000 6,625 9 independent Region Asvaldsdottir Western 14 Skorradalshreppur 3506 57 216 Davio Petursson Region Western Laufey 15 Hvalfjaroarsveit 3511 610 482 independent Region Johannsdottir Western 16 Borgarbyggo 3609 3,469 4,926 Pall S. Brynjarsson independent Region Western Bjorn Steinar 17 Grundarfjaroarbaer 3709 905 148 independent Region Palmason Western Egill Valberg 18 Helgafellssveit 3710 58 243
    [Show full text]
  • 148. Löggjafarþing 2017–2018. Þingskjal 1344 — 401. Mál. Fjármála- Og Efnahagsráðherra Við Fyrirspurn Frá Óla B
    148. löggjafarþing 2017–2018. Þingskjal 1344 — 401. mál. Svar fjármála- og efnahagsráðherra við fyrirspurn frá Óla Birni Kárasyni um skatttekjur ríkissjóðs. 1. Hverjar voru heildartekjur ríkissjóðs af eftirtöldum skattstofnum árin 2009–2017, sundurgreindar eftir sveitarfélögum og árum: a. tekjuskatti einstaklinga, b. tekjuskatti lögaðila, c. tryggingagjaldi, d. eignarsköttum, e. veiðigjöldum? Fyrst skal tekið fram að nær ógerlegt er að sundurliða tekjur ríkissjóðs (samkvæmt árs- reikningi) eftir sveitarfélögum. Álagningu skatta á einstaklinga og lögaðila má hins vegar flokka eftir lögheimilissveitarfélagi gjaldanda. Töflur fyrir a–d-lið sýna álagða skatta og gjöld sem ríkisskattstjóri lagði á einstaklinga og lögaðila í hverju sveitarfélagi, fyrir árin 2010–2018 (vegna tekna áranna 2009–2017) í tilfelli einstaklinga, og fyrir árin 2010–2017 (vegna starfsemi 2009–2016) í tilfelli lögaðila, þar sem álagning lögaðila 2018 hefur ekki átt sér stað. Lög (og reglugerðir) um veiðigjald miðast við fiskveiðiár, fremur en almanaksár. Vegna þessa er nær ógerlegt að flokka álagningu veiðigjalds niður á almanaksár eftir sveitar- félögum. Auk þessa gæfi flokkun eftir sveitarfélagi gjaldanda veiðigjalds ekki mynd af því hvar starfsemin, sem gjaldið er lagt á, á sér stað – þar sem sveitarfélag gjaldanda og sveitar- félagið þar sem starfsemin á sér stað er mjög oft ekki hið sama. Vegna þessa liggja umbeðnar upplýsingar (e-liður) ekki fyrir. Aðra liði má sjá í meðfylgjandi töflum. Tekjuskattur einstak- linga er færður annars vegar sem brúttóupphæð álagningar, og hins vegar nettóupphæð álagn- ingar, þar sem búið er að draga frá þann persónuafslátt til útsvars sem greiddur er af ríkissjóði til sveitarfélaga fyrir hönd tekjulágra. Eignarskattar eru hér auðlegðarskattur og viðbótar- auðlegðarskattur, en álagning annarra tegunda eignarskatta, t.d.
    [Show full text]
  • Pálsson, Grétar Már. 2015
    Impact on households and critical infrastructures from electricity failure Two case studies and a survey on public preparedness Grétar Már Pálsson Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Iceland 2015 Impact on households and critical infrastructures from electricity failure Two case studies and a survey on public preparedness Grétar Már Pálsson 30 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in Civil Engineering Advisors Dr. Björn Karlsson Böðvar Tómasson Faculty Representative Sveinn Júlíus Björnsson Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland Reykjavik, May 2015 Impact on households and critical infrastructures - Two case studies and a survey on public preparedness. 30 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of a Magister Scientiarum degree in civil engineering Copyright © 2015 Grétar Már Pálsson All rights reserved Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering School of Engineering and Natural Sciences University of Iceland VR II, Hjarðarhaga 2-6 107, Reykjavik Iceland Telephone: 525 4600 Bibliographic information: Grétar Már Pálsson, 2015, Impact on households and critical infrastructures - Two case studies and a survey on public preparedness, Master’s thesis, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, pp. 76. Printing: Háskólaprent, Fálkagata 2, 107 Reykjavík Reykjavik, Iceland, May 2015 Abstract This thesis studies the impact from electricity failure in Iceland on households and critical infrastructures. Households and critical infrastructures electricity dependence is discussed along with a theoretical identification of impacts towards these two subjects from electricity failure. Risk Assessment Plans for Iceland, Norway and Sweden are compared. The main focus of the comparison relates to how the countries focus on electricity, information and communication technologies and the role of the general public in these plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipality Credit Iceland
    okt.22 Municipality Credit Iceland Translation of Financial Statements 2015 These financial statements are translated from the original which is in Icelandic. Should there be discrepancies between the two versions, the Icelandic version will take priority over the translated version. Index Page Report of the Board of Directors and the Managing Director .................................................................................... 2 Independent Auditor's Report ................................................................................................................................... 3 Income Statement and Statement of Comprehensive Income .................................................................................. 4 Balance Sheet ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Statement of Changes in Equity ................................................................................................................................ 6 Statement of Cash Flows .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Notes to the Financial Statements ............................................................................................................................ 8-26 Municipality Credit Iceland Plc. Identity number 580407-1100 Borgartun 30, P.O. Box 8100 128 Reykjavik Report of the Board of Directors and the Managing
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the EFTA Surveillance Authority Regarding the Implementation of Directive 91/271/EU on the Treatment of Wastewater from Agglomerations
    Report to the EFTA Surveillance Authority regarding the implementation of Directive 91/271/EU on the treatment of wastewater from agglomerations. Environment Agency of Iceland March 2013 Contents FOREWORD................................................................................................................ 3 1. THE LEGALIZATION OF DIRECTIVE 91/271/EEC (UWWD) ...................... 3 2. CIRCUMSTANCES IN ICELAND AND THE AVAILABILITY OF DATA .. 5 3. AGGLOMERATIONS OF MORE THAN 2,000 P.E. ......................................... 5 3.1 DISCHARGE TO FRESHWATER AND ESTUARIES FROM AGGLOMERATION OF MORE THAN 2,000 P.E. .......................................................................................................... 7 3.2 DISCHARGES TO COASTAL WATER FROM COLLECTIVE SYSTEM FOR AGGLOMERATIONS OF MORE THAN 10,000 P.E. ........................................................... 8 4. PLANS FOR SEWERAGE AND URBAN SITES ................................................ 9 5. DEVELOPMENT IN DRAINAGE AFFAIRS ...................................................... 9 6. SEWERAGE AFFAIRS IN RURAL AREAS ..................................................... 11 7. DEFINITION OF RECEPTORS ......................................................................... 12 7.1 IDENTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE AREAS ................................................................. 12 7.2 LESS SENSITIVE AREAS ........................................................................................ 12 The Capital area .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Act on the Judiciary No. 15, 25 March 1998
    Act on the Judiciary No.15/1998 Translation from Icelandic Act on the Judiciary No. 15, 25 March 1998 Entered into force on 1 July 1998, with the exception of Article 34. Amended by Act No. 47/2006 (entered into force on 1 July 2006), Act No. 88/2008 (entered into force on 1 January 2009, with the exception of transitional provision VII which entered into force on 21 June 2008), Act No. 147/2009 (entered into force on 1 January 2010), Act No. 45/2010 (entered into force on 29 May 2010), Act 162/2010 (entered into force on 1 January 2011) and Act 12/20111(entered into force on 17 February 2011). Chapter I Judicial Organisation Section 1 The Supreme Court of Iceland shall be the highest judicial authority in Iceland. The Court shall be a court of appeals, based in Reykjavík. Section 2 The district courts shall be eight in number. Their names, places and areas of office shall be as follows: 1. The District Court of Reykjavík shall be based in Reykjavík, serving the areas of the following municipalities: Reykjavík, Seltjarnarnes, Mosfellsbær and Kjósarhreppur. 2. The District Court of Western Iceland shall be based at Borgarnes, serving the areas of the following municipalities: Akranes, Hvalfjarðarstrandarhreppur, Skilmannahreppur, Innri-Akraneshreppur, Leirár- og Melahreppur, Andakílshreppur, Skorradalshreppur, Lundarreykjadalshreppur, Reykholtsdalshreppur, Hálsahreppur, Hvítársíðuhreppur, Þverárhlíðarhreppur, Borgarhreppur, Borgarbyggð, Álftaneshreppur, Kolbeinsstaðahreppur, Eyja- og Miklaholtshreppur, Snæfellsbær, Eyrarsveit, Helgafellssveit, Stykkishólmsbær, Dalabyggð and Saurbæjarhreppur. 3. The District Court of the West Fjords shall be based at Ísafjörður, serving the areas of the following municipalities: Reykhólahreppur, Vesturbyggð, Tálknafjarðarhreppur, Bolungarvík, Ísafjörður, Súðavíkurhreppur, Árneshreppur, Kaldrananaeshreppur, Hólmavíkurhreppur, Kirkjubólshreppur, Broddaneshreppur and Bæjarhreppur.
    [Show full text]
  • Tafla 1 Hlutfallslegt Atvinnuleysi Í September Atvinnuleysi Í % Af Breytingar Frá Síðasta Breytingar Frá Sama Mánuði Í Áætl
    Tafla 1 Hlutfallslegt atvinnuleysi í september Atvinnuleysi í % af Breytingar frá síðasta Breytingar frá sama mánuði í áætl. mannafla mánuði fyrra Alls Karlar Konur Alls Karlar Konur Alls Karlar Konur Höfuðborgarsvæðið 9,2 9,3 9,1 0,3 0,4 0,3 5,4 5,5 5,3 Landsbyggðin 8,6 8,1 9,4 0,8 0,9 0,8 5,6 5,3 6,1 Vesturland 5,6 5,1 6,3 0,6 0,4 0,8 3,8 3,4 4,4 Vestfirðir 3,3 3,2 3,4 0,4 0,2 0,6 1,1 1,2 1,0 Norðurland vestra 3,1 2,9 3,3 0,0 0,2 -0,2 2,2 2,2 2,2 Norðurland eystra 6,1 6,0 6,2 0,6 0,6 0,4 3,3 3,5 3,0 Austurland 4,3 3,6 5,2 1,0 0,8 1,2 2,9 2,5 3,3 Suðurland 7,4 7,1 7,8 0,7 0,7 0,8 5,4 5,2 5,6 Suðurnes 18,6 16,7 21,4 1,7 1,7 1,6 12,3 10,8 14,4 Landið allt 9,0 8,9 9,2 0,5 0,6 0,4 5,5 5,5 5,6 Tafla 2 Meðalfjöldi atvinnulausra í september Meðalfjöldi Breytingar frá síðasta Breytingar frá sama mánuði í atvinnulausra í mánuði fyrra mánuðinum Alls Karlar Konur Alls Karlar Konur Alls Karlar Konur Höfuðborgarsvæðið 11220 6226 4994 190 203 -13 6630 3719 2911 Landsbyggðin 5825 3175 2650 416 246 170 3852 2097 1755 Vesturland 472 249 223 34 10 24 323 165 158 Vestfirðir 121 69 52 11 3 8 42 26 16 Norðurland vestra 111 59 52 -3 2 -5 80 45 35 Norðurland eystra 943 534 409 59 44 15 514 310 204 Austurland 288 143 145 59 28 31 194 99 95 Suðurland 1063 591 472 78 43 35 781 437 344 Suðurnes 2827 1530 1297 178 116 62 1918 1015 903 Landið allt 17045 9401 7644 606 449 157 10482 5816 4666 Tafla 3 Fjöldi atvinnulausra í lok september Fjöldi atvinnulausra í Breytingar frá síðasta Breytingar frá sama mánuði lok mánaðar mánuði í fyrra Alls Karlar Konur Alls Karlar
    [Show full text]
  • Atvinnutekjur 2008-2018 Eftir Atvinnugreinum Og Landshlutum
    Atvinnutekjur 2008-2018 eftir atvinnugreinum og landshlutum Þróunarsvið Byggðastofnunar nóvember 2019 Texti og gagnavinnsla: Sigurður Árnason Gagnaöflun: Guðmundur Guðmundsson og Sigurður Árnason 1 Fræðslustarfsemi ........................................................................................ 32 Efnisyfirlit Heilbrigðis- og félagsþjónusta .................................................................... 33 Inngangur ......................................................................................................... 4 Menningar-, íþrótta- og tómstundastarfsemi ........................................... 34 Fyrirvarar á niðurstöðum ................................................................................. 6 Annað – bálkar S, T, U og X ........................................................................ 35 Helstu niðurstöður ........................................................................................... 7 Höfuðborgarsvæðið ........................................................................................ 36 Framsetning gagna á myndrænu formi ......................................................... 11 Reykjavík ..................................................................................................... 37 Landið allt – þróun atvinnutekna eftir svæðum ........................................... 12 Kópavogur ................................................................................................... 39 Landið allt - þróun atvinnutekna eftir atvinnugreinum...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Íslensk Skógarúttekt Og Skógar Skógræktarfélaganna. Björn
    Fulltrúafundur skógræktarfélaganna 25. mars 2017 Flatarmál ÍSÚ og GIS gagnagrunnsins Flatarmál (ha) Flatarmál GIS 2015, ræktaðir skógar 49.500 Flatarmál ÍSÚ 2015, ræktaðir skógar 42.000 Mismunur 7.500 15% Árið 2007 var þessi munur 25% Flatarmál skógræktar Hlutfall skógræktar í landinu Stærðarröð Landshluti (ha) (%) 1 Suðurland 16.330 30,7% 2 Norðurland 12.257 23,0% 3 Austurland 10.783 20,2% 4 Vesturland 6.604 12,4% 5 Suðvesturland 4.830 9,1% 6 Vestfirðir 2.463 4,6% Landið allt 53.266 100% Stærðarröð Landshluti Flatarmál skógræktar (ha) Hlutfall af landshluta 1 Suðvesturland 4.830 4,8% 2 Vesturland 6.604 0,7% 3 Austurland 10.783 0,7% 4 Suðurland 16.330 0,5% 5 Norðurland 12.257 0,4% 6 Vestfirðir 2.463 0,3% Landið allt 53.266 0,5% Hlutfall skógræktar eftir stærð landshluta neðan 400 m Stærðarröð Landshluti Flatarmál skógræktar (ha) Hlutfall neðan 400m 1 Suðvesturland 4.830 5,9% 2 Austurland 10.783 2,4% 3 Suðurland 16.330 1,3% 4 Vesturland 6.604 1,1% 5 Norðurland 12.257 1,0% 6 Vestfirðir 2.463 0,4% Landið allt 53.266 1,2% Stærðarröð Landshluti Flatarmál birkis (ha) Hlutfall birkis í landinu (%) 1 Suðurland 34.166 22,5% 2 Vesturland 33.789 22,3% 3 Vestfirðir 30.891 20,4% 4 Norðurland 28.742 18,9% 5 Austurland 18.628 12,3% 6 Suðvesturland 5.320 3,5% Landið allt 151.537 100% Stærðarröð Landshluti Flatarmál birkis (ha) Hlutfall af landshluta 1 Suðvesturland 5.320 5,3% 2 Vesturland 33.789 3,6% 3 Vestfirðir 30.891 3,3% 4 Austurland 18.628 1,1% 5 Suðurland 34.166 1,1% 6 Norðurland 28.742 0,8% Landið allt 151.537 1,1% Flatarmál náttúrulegs birkis
    [Show full text]
  • Samanburður Á Orkukostnaði Heimila Árið 2020
    SAMANBURÐUR Á ORKUKOSTNAÐI HEIMILA ÁRIÐ 2020 Samanburður á orkukostnaði heimila Líkt og undanfarin ár, hefur Byggðastofnun fengið Orkustofnun til að reikna út kostnað á ársgrundvelli, við raforkunotkun og húshitun á sömu fasteigninni, á nokkrum þéttbýlisstöðum og í dreifbýli. Viðmiðunareignin er einbýlishús, 140 m2 að grunnfleti og 350m3. Almenn raforkunotkun er sú raforka sem er notuð í annað en að hita upp húsnæði, s.s. ljós og heimilistæki, en miðað er við 4.500 kWst í almennri rafmagnsnotkun og 28.400 kWst við húshitun án varmadælu og 14.200 kWst með varmadælu. Gert er ráð fyrir að „loft í vatn“ varmadæla skili 50% sparnaði á raforku til húshitunar en orkusparnaðurinn er þó háður ýmsum þáttum (sjá í kaflanum Fyrirvari og aðrar upplýsingar). Árlegir útreikningar eru nú til frá árinu 2013 og eru uppfærðir eftir því sem ástæða þykir til. Við útreikninga þessa er almenn rafmagnsnotkun og fastagjald tekin saman annarsvegar og hitunarkostnaður hins vegar. Gjöldin eru reiknuð út samkvæmt gjaldskrá þann 1. september 2020. Auk staðanna sem miðað var við síðustu ár hafa 22 nýir staðir nú bæst við og ná tölur fyrir þá alla aftur til 2014. Staðirnir eru Bifröst, Brautarholt á Skeiðum, Drangsnes, Garður, Grenivík, Hofsós, Hrafnagil, Hrísey, Hvanneyri, Kjalarnes, Kópasker, Laugar í Reykjadal, Laugarvatn, Ólafsfjörður, Reykhólar, Reykjahlíð, Sandgerði, Skagaströnd, Stokkseyri, Varmahlíð, Vík í Mýrdal og Vogar. Á höfuðborgarsvæðinu eru í meginatriðum fjögur svæði m.t.t. orkukostnaðar. Sami kostnaður er í Reykjavík, Kópavogi og austurhluta Garðabæjar þar sem Veitur ohf. eru með sérleyfi fyrir flutning og dreifingu á rafmagni sem og til reksturs hitaveitu. Það sem er frábrugðið í Hafnarfirði og vesturhluta Garðabæjar (þ.m.t.
    [Show full text]