The Spirit Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Spirit Of He launched his crusade for airpower almost eighty years ago. His ideas live on in the armed forces of today. The Spirit of Billy Mitchell By Walter J. Boyne N TODAY'S cynical world, the very At the height of his fame, when he Billy Mitchell, act of remembering a hero poses was tilting with the War Department the spiritual many problems. Invoking Billy Mitch- and the Navy Department with equal father of the Air Force, led the ell ' s name raises questions of rel- enthusiasm, the term "Mitchellism" evance, accuracy, and purpose. Can was coined by the press to symbol- fight for airpower after a man who began his crusade for ize the concept that airpower was World War I and airpower nearly eighty years ago, now the dominant military factor and was court- whose finest hour came seventy years that sea and land forces were becom- martialed for his ago, and who died in relative obscu- ing subordinate. In the intervening aggressive advocacy of the rity sixty years ago, have more than years, the correctness of his think- cause. symbolic meaning for us today? Is ing, the accuracy of his predictions, the symbol really accurate? Did the risks he took, the sacrifices he so Mitchell actually predict the future? willingly made of his health and his And, most fundamental, given the career, and, by far the most impor- passage of time and events and con- tant, the influence he had on his sidering the technological, economic, successors have conferred a new, social, and political revolutions that higher, and entirely contemporary have transpired since his heyday, meaning on "Mitchellism." can anything Mitchell did or said be Billy Mitchell's name conjures up useful for today's United States Air different and mostly stereotyped Force? images. For those with an interest in The answer to all of these ques- airpower, it brings to mind the vi- tions is a resounding "yes," for he sionary who sank battleships and paid molded what would become the US the price for defying the War De- Air Force in a thousand ways that partment. Unfortunately, for far too have been increasingly overlooked many, the name Billy Mitchell is and need to be remembered. Today, associated only with a grainy black- USAF is riding the fourth section of and-white movie showing Gary Coo- a multistage rocket that Billy Mitchell per fighting a court-martial. launched by the sheer force of his Brig. Gen. William L. Mitchell personality and the breadth of his deserves better than this. So great vision. was his impact on the Army Air Ser- 66 AIR FORCE Magazine / June 1996 .. ..;.,....,:40'. .4.-,....*''' AIR FORCE Magazine / June 1996 67 General Mitchell (center, with walking stick) poses with his staff in Koblenz, Germany, on January 15, 1919. His experi- ences during World War I crystallized his belief in airpower. Below, he walks through a Langley Field, Va., hangar with Secretary of the Navy Edwin Denby. vice and its successor organizations John L. Mitchell, became a US sena- Washington, he felt the first attrac- that the effect is still being felt. Dur- tor and would quietly smooth the tion to aviation, seeing in it the fu- ing Mitchell' s meteoric military ca- way for his impetuous son's early ture for his country and, not inciden- reer, he charted new paths, set new military career. Commissioned as a tally, for himself. Paying for his own standards, and influenced key lead- second lieutenant at age eighteen, flying lessons, he learned to fly in ers for decades to come. Mitchell Billy Mitchell immediately got on four Sunday sessions at the Curtiss was twenty years ahead of his time the fast track by demonstrating his Flying School, Newport News, Va., when he put forth his detailed vision leadership and organizational skills in 1915. of a hazardous future. More impor- in the Philippines and Alaska. With- There have been disputes over his tant, he knew that airpower was the out a contracting officer' s warrant, ability as a flyer—for example, Maj. answer to overcoming the danger. he managed to spend $50,000 of US Gen. Benjamin D. Foulois always His impassioned campaign to tell government money to build a tele- contended that Mitchell was not a his story had a quadruple-barreled graph line across Alaska—on an au- "regular" Army flyer because he had impact on the modern Air Force, thorized budget of $5,000. The over- not been through an Army flying past, present, and future. run must not have hurt Mitchell; he school. (This was a somewhat ironic came back a captain at age twenty- point for Foulois to make, given that Mitchell and the Past three, the youngest in the Army. he had taught himself to fly by corre- Billy Mitchell was born into privi- At thirty-two, Mitchell became the sponding with the Wright brothers.) leged circumstances in Nice, France, youngest officer ever appointed to On the other hand, one of the great on December 29, 1879. His father, the Army General Staff. While in pioneer test pilots, the record-setting 68 AIR FORCE Magazine/ June 1996 Challenge to the Navy In the convulsive downsizing that followed World War I, Mitchell, who had achieved the grade of temporary brigadier general (a grade he would retain for all but ten months until April 1925), was one of the few of- ficers not reduced in rank, much to the distress of longtime rival Foulois, who reverted to being a major. Yet the War Department regarded Mitch- ell as a loose cannon and placed him under the supervision of a nonflyer, Maj. Gen. Charles T. Menoher, the new Director of the Air Service. It was at this point that Billy Mitchell set out on the path that would lead him to his greatest heights— and ultimately to his court-martial. Knowing he would never prevail over MB-2 bombers fly in formation over Atlantic coastal waters in exercises intended the stolid, conservative Army lead- to demonstrate the prowess of airplanes against battleships. Though fragile ers of the time, Mitchell went pub- by today's standards, the MB-2s could carry more than a ton of ordnance. lic. He soon became a national fig- ure as a witness at Congressional hearings. He expanded his audience Lt. Lester J. Maitland, stated un- the Saint-Mihiel offensive of Sep- with speeches and articles on his equivocally that Mitchell "could fly tember 1918 was chief of the Air new ideas about airpower. Already anything with wings and fly it well." Service, 1st Army, American Expe- in hot water with the Army, he next Mitchell's flying catapulted him to ditionary Forces. collided with the deep-water Navy prominence, and he became deputy Mitchell commanded 1,476 air- by saying that airplanes could sink chief of the Signal Corps Aviation craft and twenty balloons, assembled battleships. Section in 1916, with the rank of ma- from 101 American, British, French, The Navy's leadership ignored, jor. This was his ticket to the top. He and Italian squadrons, in the great- ridiculed, or attacked Mitchell, de- wangled his way to France as a mili- est air offensive of the war. The pending on the issue, but he finally tary observer in March 1917. When battle of Saint-Mihiel was itself a bit backed them into a corner with an the US declared war on Imperial Ger- of an anticlimax, as the Germans open challenge while testifying be- many the next month, he soon estab- were in the process of evacuating fore the House subcommittee on avia- lished himself as the premier US avia- the salient, but the air battle went as tion. Mitchell announced that "1,000 tion officer in France. He was promoted Mitchell had planned. bombardment airplanes can be built to lieutenant colonel in May and to colonel in August 1917 and received a rating as a Junior Military Aviator without the normal testing process. Fluent in French, unlike most of his colleagues, Billy Mitchell be- came what today would be called a master networker—cementing ties, obtaining resources, making friends, and pledging help that he could only hope to deliver. Hugh "Boom" Tren- chard, commander of the Royal Fly- ing Corps (later, first Marshal of the Royal Air Force), became his mentor. He could not have chosen better. Mitchell drew many ideas from Trenchard, especially the fundamen- tal conclusion that airpower was pri- marily an instrument for offensive, not defensive, employment. Mitchell embraced Trenchard' s concepts on supremacy in the air and demon- Mitchell (arm raised) speaks with Gen. of the Armies John J. Pershing during strated them as chief of the Air Ser- an inspection of an MB-2. Mitchell's initial challenges to the Navy were met vice, 1st Brigade, and by the time of with ridicule, but he eventually got the chance to prove the might of airpower. AIR FORCE Magazine/ June 1996 69 German battleship, and she went down, to the horror of the assembled Navy brass. To add insult to injury, the seventh ship of Mitchell' s for- mation, a Handley Page, dropped its 2,000 pounder into the foam and bubbles rising from the sunken ship. Mitchell was vindicated, but it was the Navy itself that would benefit most from the tests, as they turned immediately to embrace the concept of aircraft carriers, which would dominate the naval war in the Pa- cific only twenty years later. Oddly enough, Mitchell's greatest contri- butions to the Air Service and its successor organizations, contribu- tions that echo today, were made in a far less spectacular fashion.
Recommended publications
  • British Identity, the Masculine Ideal, and the Romanticization of the Royal Flying Corps Image
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 4-2019 A Return to Camelot?: British Identity, The Masculine Ideal, and the Romanticization of the Royal Flying Corps Image Abby S. Whitlock College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Whitlock, Abby S., "A Return to Camelot?: British Identity, The Masculine Ideal, and the Romanticization of the Royal Flying Corps Image" (2019). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1276. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1276 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Return to Camelot?: British Identity, The Masculine Ideal, and the Romanticization of the Royal Flying Corps Image Abby Stapleton Whitlock Undergraduate Honors Thesis College of William and Mary Lyon G. Tyler Department of History 24 April 2019 Whitlock !2 Whitlock !3 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………….. 4 Introduction …………………………………….………………………………… 5 Chapter I: British Aviation and the Future of War: The Emergence of the Royal Flying Corps …………………………………….……………………………….. 13 Wartime Developments: Organization, Training, and Duties Uniting the Air Services: Wartime Exigencies and the Formation of the Royal Air Force Chapter II: The Cultural Image of the Royal Flying Corps .……….………… 25 Early Roots of the RFC Image: Public Imagination and Pre-War Attraction to Aviation Marketing the “Cult of the Air Fighter”: The Dissemination of the RFC Image in Government Sponsored Media Why the Fighter Pilot? Media Perceptions and Portrayals of the Fighter Ace Chapter III: Shaping the Ideal: The Early Years of Aviation Psychology .….
    [Show full text]
  • Class Three and Four WWI, Bargaining Failure, Strategic Bombing
    Class three and four WWI, bargaining failure, strategic bombing May 17, 2018 () WWI, bargaining failure, strategic bombing May 17, 2018 1 / 60 What this course about: WWI as poster child Brief history A world of colonial powers: France, Russia, UK, emergent Germany, Italy to some extent World of alliances: Germany and AH empire vs France, UK, Russia. Arms races, especially UK vs Germany in navies Franco-Prusian war: short, swift, the loser paid Economically integrated (Norman Angell, "The Great Illusion.") Eve of war: both sides anticipated a short war with reparations, both sides expected to win. If it did not end quickly, cooler heads would prevail and end it. What had happened to military technology as illustrated by Civil War? Breech-loading, rifled barrel weapons Improved artillery machine guns perfected Early civil war: a war of movement; later civil war, butchery as defense gained upper hand Upshot: pendulum swung to defence. () WWI, bargaining failure, strategic bombing May 17, 2018 2 / 60 WWI "Make the right wing strong" (Schliefen’sdying utterance) Opportunity cost. PA problem: where’sthe glory in defence? (what are incentives of left-wing generals? Civil War generals "leaked info to newspapers that enhanced their careers); March on Paris? (Von Kluck exposes his flank). Belgian neutrality: misperceptions ("they won’t. fight," Britain will not enter war). Historians say: Germans "had" the information, i.e., objective observer would have predicted this, but didn’tsee it this way. (behavioral economics: why do economists, Dr.’s,disagree?) Behavioral: see what you want to see (Romeo and Juliet). Militarism: misaligned incentives again, PA problem ("bloody wars and dread diseases") France: quick strike through Ardennes, no need to be defensive, belief the Germans wouldn’tinvade neutral Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • View of the British Way in Warfare, by Captain B
    “The Bomber Will Always Get Through”: The Evolution of British Air Policy and Doctrine, 1914-1940 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Katie Lynn Brown August 2011 © 2011 Katie Lynn Brown. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled “The Bomber Will Always Get Through”: The Evolution of British Air Policy and Doctrine, 1914-1940 by KATIE LYNN BROWN has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Peter John Brobst Associate Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT BROWN, KATIE LYNN, M.A., August 2011, History “The Bomber Will Always Get Through”: The Evolution of British Air Policy and Doctrine, 1914-1940 Director of Thesis: Peter John Brobst The historiography of British grand strategy in the interwar years overlooks the importance air power had in determining Britain’s interwar strategy. Rather than acknowledging the newly developed third dimension of warfare, most historians attempt to place air power in the traditional debate between a Continental commitment and a strong navy. By examining the development of the Royal Air Force in the interwar years, this thesis will show that air power was extremely influential in developing Britain’s grand strategy. Moreover, this thesis will study the Royal Air Force’s reliance on strategic bombing to consider any legal or moral issues. Finally, this thesis will explore British air defenses in the 1930s as well as the first major air battle in World War II, the Battle of Britain, to see if the Royal Air Force’s almost uncompromising faith in strategic bombing was warranted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron's
    The Fighting Five-Tenth: One Fighter-Bomber Squadron’s Experience during the Development of World War II Tactical Air Power by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama December 14, 2013 Keywords: World War II, fighter squadrons, tactical air power, P-47 Thunderbolt, European Theater of Operations Copyright 2013 by Adrianne Lee Hodgin Bruce Approved by William Trimble, Chair, Alumni Professor of History Alan Meyer, Assistant Professor of History Mark Sheftall, Associate Professor of History Abstract During the years between World War I and World War II, many within the Army Air Corps (AAC) aggressively sought an independent air arm and believed that strategic bombardment represented an opportunity to inflict severe and dramatic damages on the enemy while operating autonomously. In contrast, working in cooperation with ground forces, as tactical forces later did, was viewed as a subordinate role to the army‘s infantry and therefore upheld notions that the AAC was little more than an alternate means of delivering artillery. When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt called for a significantly expanded air arsenal and war plan in 1939, AAC strategists saw an opportunity to make an impression. Eager to exert their sovereignty, and sold on the efficacy of heavy bombers, AAC leaders answered the president‘s call with a strategic air doctrine and war plans built around the use of heavy bombers. The AAC, renamed the Army Air Forces (AAF) in 1941, eventually put the tactical squadrons into play in Europe, and thus tactical leaders spent 1943 and the beginning of 1944 preparing tactical air units for three missions: achieving and maintaining air superiority, isolating the battlefield, and providing air support for ground forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneficial Bombing
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters University of Nebraska Press Fall 2010 Beneficial Bombing Mark Clodfelter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Clodfelter, Mark, "Beneficial Bombing" (2010). University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters. 37. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/unpresssamples/37 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Nebraska Press at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Nebraska Press -- Sample Books and Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. runninghead 1 2 3 4 ( ##& 5 6 7 8 )'#(! 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 i Buy the Book Benecial Bombing—Clodfelter Roger Buchholz, designer Studies in War, Society, and the Military general editors Peter Maslowski University of Nebraska–Lincoln David Graff Kansas State University Reina Pennington Norwich University editorial board D’Ann Campbell Director of Government and Foundation Relations, U.S. Coast Guard Foundation Mark A. Clodfelter National War College Brooks D. Simpson Arizona State University Roger J. Spiller George C. Marshall Professor of Military History U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (retired) Timothy H. E. Travers University of Calgary Arthur Waldron Lauder Professor of International Relations University of Pennsylvania Buy the Book FM3-Title page Recto Use page pdf as supplied.
    [Show full text]
  • The RN AS and Bombing Strategy 271 Story Skyscraper ... Had Suddenly
    The RN AS and Bombing Strategy 271 story skyscraper ... had suddenly been erected in London.' The first Handley Page went to 3 Wing• where Elder formed a poor opinion of its capabilities. Magneto trouble caused delays in flying as did distorted propellers 'through either ineffi­ cient design or bad material, as far as one can judge, from the former.' A second aircraft arrived in February, and by this time the Handley Pages may well have been serviceable. It was not, however, until 16 March that the weather was judged good enough to attempt the first raid. The aircraft selected was No 1460, which had joined the wing in October. The crew consisted of Babington; Stedman, acting as observer; Flight Sub-Lieutenant C.L. Hains of Salmon Arm, BC, who served as after gunlayer; and Adjutant Chasard of the French air service who accompanied them as forward gunlayer and guide. 30 The great advantage of the big bombing aircraft was its capacity and what we would now call cost-effectiveness. The Rolls-Royce Eagle engines, each deve­ loping 250 hp, gave the 0/100 an endurance of nine-and-a-half hours with an all-up weight of five-and-a-half tons, including 380 gallons of fuel and ten 112-lb bombs. For shorter raids, carrying 250 gallons of fuel in wing tanks and seventy gallons in the fuselage, the aircraft could carry fourteen 112-lb bombs. If the fuel in the fuselage was removed the load could be increased to sixteen bombs. There were sixteen cells in bomb bays under the fuselage in which bombs were hung by their nose.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BRITISH AIR CAMPAIGN DURING the BATTLE of the SOMME APRIL-NOVEMBER, 1916: a PYRRHIC VICTORY by Thomas G. Bradbeer M.A., Univ
    THE BRITISH AIR CAMPAIGN DURING THE BATTLE OF THE SOMME APRIL-NOVEMBER, 1916: A PYRRHIC VICTORY By Thomas G. Bradbeer M.A., University of Saint Mary, 1999 Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ___________________ Chairperson Theodore A. Wilson, PhD Committee members ____________________ Jonathan H. Earle, PhD ____________________ Adrian R. Lewis, PhD ____________________ Brent J. Steele, PhD ____________________ Jacob Kipp, PhD Date defended: March 28, 2011 The Dissertation Committee for Thomas G. Bradbeer certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: THE BRITISH AIR CAMPAIGN DURING THE BATTLE OF THE SOMME APRIL-NOVEMBER, 1916: A PYRRHIC VICTORY ___________________ Chairperson Theodore A. Wilson, PhD Date approved March 28, 2011 ii THE BRITISH AIR CAMPAIGN DURING THE BATTLE OF THE SOMME, APRIL-NOVEMBER, 1916: A PYRRHIC VICTORY ABSTRACT The Battle of the Somme was Britain’s first major offensive of the First World War. Just about every facet of the campaign has been analyzed and reexamined. However, one area of the battle that has been little explored is the second battle which took place simultaneously to the one on the ground. This second battle occurred in the skies above the Somme, where for the first time in the history of warfare a deliberate air campaign was planned and executed to support ground operations. The British Royal Flying Corps (RFC) was tasked with achieving air superiority over the Somme sector before the British Fourth Army attacked to start the ground offensive.
    [Show full text]
  • AIR POWER and the WAR Knock an Enemy out of the War
    By J. E. WALLACESTERLING Professor of History This article is being written on the anniversary of the first artillery, tank and submarine have each in turn greatly affected thousand-plane raid in history. On the night of May 30, 1942, the nature of warfare and have wrought innovations in applied more than one thousand bombers based on Britain soared into military science. But for none of these, with the possible excep- the sky and pointed their noses southeastward across the tion of the submarine, have such extravagant claims been made Channel. The target for the night was Cologne. Two thousand as for the airplane. Among the most extravagant of these tons of explosive and incendiary bombs were unloaded over the claims was that put forward by the brilliant Italian writer, target area in ninety minutes; forty-four planes were lost. Two General Douhet, in the years between the two world wars of nights later, June 1, Essen, the home of the Krupp armament this century. General Douhet advocated that an air force should works, was struck with comparable force; here thirty-five be completely independent of the other armed services, and planes were lost. News of these raids warmed the cockles of that it should be used to destroy an enemy's capacity to make many a heart in Britain and elsewhere, for at last the Germans war by bombing enemy factories and transport systems and by were being paid back in their own coin, and with interest, for crushing the enemy's will to fight under a rain of terror from the Luftwaffe had never dropped as much as five hundred tons the skies.
    [Show full text]
  • Trenchard's Doctrine: Organisational Culture, the 'Air Force Spirit' and The
    TRENCHARD’S DOCTRINE Trenchard’s Doctrine: Organisational Culture, the ‘Air Force spirit’ and the Foundation of the Royal Air Force in the Interwar Years ROSS MAHONEY Independent Scholar Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT While the Royal Air Force was born in war, it was created in peace. In his 1919 memorandum on the Permanent Organization of the Royal Air Force, Air Marshal Sir Hugh Trenchard outlined his vision for the development of the Service. In this strategy, Trenchard developed the idea of generating an ‘Air Force spirit’ that provided the basis of the RAF’s development in the years after the First World War. The basis for this process was the creation of specific institutions and structures that helped generate a culture that allowed the RAF to establish itself as it dealt with challenges from its sister services. This article explores the character of that culture and ethos and in analysing the early years of the RAF through a cultural lens, suggests that Trenchard’s so-called ‘doctrine’ was focussed more on organisational developments rather than air power thinking as has often been suggested. In 1917, during the First World War and in direct response to the challenge of the aerial bombing of Great Britain, the British government decided to create an independent air service to manage the requirements of aerial warfare. With the formation of the Royal Air Force (RAF) on 1 April 1918, the Service’s senior leaders had to deal with the challenge of developing a new culture for the organisation that was consistent with the aims of the Air Force and delivered a sense of identity to its personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Bombing the European Axis Powers a Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945
    Inside frontcover 6/1/06 11:19 AM Page 1 Bombing the European Axis Powers A Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945 Air University Press Team Chief Editor Carole Arbush Copy Editor Sherry C. Terrell Cover Art and Book Design Daniel M. Armstrong Composition and Prepress Production Mary P. Ferguson Quality Review Mary J. Moore Print Preparation Joan Hickey Distribution Diane Clark NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page i Bombing the European Axis Powers A Historical Digest of the Combined Bomber Offensive 1939–1945 RICHARD G. DAVIS Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 2006 NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page ii Air University Library Cataloging Data Davis, Richard G. Bombing the European Axis powers : a historical digest of the combined bomber offensive, 1939-1945 / Richard G. Davis. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-58566-148-1 1. World War, 1939-1945––Aerial operations. 2. World War, 1939-1945––Aerial operations––Statistics. 3. United States. Army Air Forces––History––World War, 1939- 1945. 4. Great Britain. Royal Air Force––History––World War, 1939-1945. 5. Bombing, Aerial––Europe––History. I. Title. 940.544––dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Book and CD-ROM cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6615 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii NewFrontmatter 5/31/06 1:42 PM Page iii Contents Page DISCLAIMER .
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-90-4 Military Presence
    Report to the Chairrnen and Ranking d GAO Minority Members, Senate and House Committees on Armed Services October 1989 MILITARY PRESENCE U.S. Personnel in NATO Europe GAO/NSlAD90-04 .^ , .b.., ,,. National Security and International Affairs Division B-232557 October 6, 1989 The Honorable Sam Dunn Chairman, Committee on Armed Services United States Senate The Honorable Les Aspin Chairman, Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives The Honorable John W. Warner Ranking Minority Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate The Honorable William L. Dickinson Ranking Minority Member Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives This report describes the U.S. military presence in ix~rn Europe-more than 723,000 servicemen and women, U.S. civilian employees, dependents, and foreign national employees in 14 NATO countries, Greenland, and West Berlin. The information in this report on the location and mission of these people should be useful to your Committees in addressing burden sharing issues, the President’s proposal to reduce U.S. forces in Europe, and concerns about the costs associated with maintaining U.S. overseas commitments. We are sending copies of this report to the Secretaries of Defense and State and other appropriate congressional committees. It was prepared under the direction of Joseph E. Kelley, Director, Security and International Relations Issues, who may be contacted on (202) 275-4128 if you or your staff have further questions. Other major contributors to the report are listed in appendix VII. Frank C. Conahan Assistant Comptroller General Executive Summ~ For the past few years, the Congress has questioned whether the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biplanes and Bombsights: British Bombing in Word War I
    Biplanes and Bombsights British Bombing in World War I George K. WMiams Air University Press Maxell Air Force Base, Alabama May 1999 Library of Congress Cataloging-In-Publication Data Williams. George Kent, 1944- Biplanes and bombsights : British Bombing in World War I / George Kent Williams. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ' 1. World War, 1914-1918-Aerial operations, British. 2. Bombers-Great Britain. I. ' Title. D602.W48 1999 940 .4'4941-dc21 ~9-26205 CIP Disclaimer opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressedor implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release : distribution unlimited. e il Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . .. ' , ix INTRODUCTION . : . 1 - NO. 3 WING ROYAL NAVAL AIR SERVICE (JULY 1916-MAY 1917) . .. ... 30f Notes . 2 BRITISH BOMBING BEGINS . 35 Notes . .. 67 3 41ST WING ROYAL FLYING CORPS (JUNE 1917-JANUARY 1918) . 73 Notes . .. 125 4 . EIGHTH BRIGADE AND INDEPENDENT FORCE (FEBRUARY-NOVEMBER 1918) . 133 Notes . 180 5 EIGHTH BRIGADE AND INDEPENDENT FORCE OPERATIONS . 189 Notes . 231 6 POSTWAR ASSESSMENTS . 239 Notes . 264 APPENDIX . 269 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 289 INDEX . 299 iii Illustrations Table Page 1 'Battle Casualties, Night Squadrons, June-November 1918 . 210 Photographs Handley Page . 9 DeHavilland 4B . 43 Me . 63 Foreword This study measures wartime claims against actual results of the British bombing campaign against Germany in the Great War. Components of the' Royal Naval Air Service (RNAS), the Royal Flying Corps (RFC); and the Royal Air Force (RAF) conducted bombing raids between July 1916 and the Armistice.
    [Show full text]