DOCSLIB.ORG

Spanish-American War Play

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spanish-American War Play SPANISH-AMERICAN WAR PLAY Narrator #1 American #1 Theodore Roosevelt Jose Marti (Cuban Rebel) Joseph Pulitzer Narrator #2 Rough Rider #1 American #2 (Assistant Secretary of Navy) William Randolph Hearst Narrator #3 Rough Rider #2 American #3 Cuban Rebel #1 Emilio Aguinaldo (Filipino rebel leader) Narrator #4 Newspaper Boy American #4 Cuban Rebel #2 Commodore George Dewey Narrator #5 #3 Statement of Inquiry Global competition over resources and power led to American expansion and influence Background From the time of Columbus in the late 1400s until the 1800s, most of the western hemisphere south of the present-day United States was controlled by Spain. This part of the world, known as Latin America, includes present-day Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, and South America. In the early 1800s, most of Latin America became independent from Spain, forming many of the separate nations that make up Latin America today. The United States, under the Monroe Doctrine in 1823, promised to protect these new nations from future European interference. The Monroe Doctrine also said, however, that the U.S. would not interfere with any colonies that European countries still had. Although Spain had lost most of Latin America by the 1820s, it still controlled Cuba and Puerto Rico. Spain also held the Philippines and Guam in the Pacific. The people of these colonies were not happy with Spanish rule, and by the late 1800s, rebellions had broken out in Cuba and the Philippines. The Spanish government responded by cracking down harshly on the people of these colonies, depriving them of basic rights and freedoms. In the 1890s, some Americans felt that the United States should get involved to help these colonies overthrow Spanish rule. SCENE 1 - Years of Discontent and Tension in Cuba Narrator #1 – Cuba, 90 miles off the coast of Florida, had been under Spanish rule since Columbus came in 1492. Over the centuries, Cubans grew increasingly discontented (unhappy) with Spain’s harsh rule. In 1869, the Cubans began an uprising that was finally put down 10 years later. As a result, the Spanish began a policy of RECONCENTRATION which is the forced movement of large numbers of people into detention camps for military or political reasons. Cuban Rebel #1 – I can’t believe this! I am outraged! Our government is terrible! The Spanish don’t give us any rights and never let us speak our minds. They oppress us! Cuban Rebel #2 – We should revolt! It’s been too long that we’ve been ruled by a government that is thousands of miles away. Spain shouldn’t control us! We should have control over our own country! Cuban Rebel #1 – YES! What a fantastic idea! Let’s revolt! No longer should we have to deal with these RECONCENTRATION CAMPS that the Spanish have put us. Cuban Rebel #2 – These camps are miserable. How dare they treat us like dogs and force us to stay here against our will! Cuban Rebel #1 – They are disgusting! I’ve heard over 200,000 Cubans have died already from the unsanitary conditions. They barely give us any food to survive! Cuban Rebel #2 – And it’s all because we speak out against Spain and its unfair ways of governing. Cuba should not be ruled in this way. Cubans deserve a government made up of CUBANS! Narrator #1 – Some Cubans who disagreed with the government were exiled or banished from Cuba. Many fled to the United States. Jose Marti, a Cuban exile and poet living in the United States, urged the U.S. to help the Cuban rebels overthrow their oppressive government. Jose Marti – We must help my Cuban friends. They are struggling to survive! Cuba needs the help of a strong ally like America to overthrow the Spanish and their control over Cuba. American #1 – Why should Americans risk getting involved in a skirmish over Spanish rule? This is none of our business at all!!! Isolationism is the policy that we should continue to maintain. American #2 –You can’t be serious! It is our duty to get involved! Cubans deserve independence from Spain…and don’t forget; Cuba has a lot of economic potential for us. American #1 – I can’t believe what you’re saying! You’re an imperialist pig! We cannot interfere! American #2 – You really are a fool! We have about $50 million invested in Cuban sugar and rice plantations, railroads and iron mines. We are crazy not to get involved! Jose Marti – Can’t you be SYMPATHETIC to the Cuban cause? How could you allow another country to imperialize Cuba when you yourselves refused to be controlled by Great Britain? Americans should want to help us! American #1 – I will not be sympathetic! If we interfere, we risk the chance of being pulled into a costly war! Settle your own problems! American #2 – Senor Marti is right! What happens in Cuba directly affects us and our economic relations with Cuba. Call me selfish all you want, but if we get involved we will promote democracy and get our sugar and I can’t drink coffee without sugar!!!! Narrator #1 – Jose Marti returned to Cuba in an attempt to lead a revolt there. He was later killed in a skirmish and did not live to see his dream come true. SCENE 1 SUMMARY QUESTIONS 1a. Why were Cubans angry at the Spanish government? __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1b. Why did some Americans feel obligated to get involved in Cuba? Why were some against getting involved? __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SCENE 2 – The Spanish-American War Approaches Narrator #2 – In the United States, there were varying opinions about events that occurred in Cuba. Joseph Pulitzer of the New York World newspaper, and William Randolph Hearst of the New York Journal, developed a style of reporting known as YELLOW JOURNALISM, which used sensational stories and Hearst headlines to persuade and spark interest in their newspapers. Headlines were usually exaggerated and sometimes without truth. William Randolph Hearst – I cannot believe this! The United States government is just ignoring the horrors in Cuba. We must let the public know how bad it is. I hope my newspaper reaps all the benefits of this nasty situation in Cuba. Joseph Pulitzer – Well I know that my upcoming article is bound to get the attention of my readers AND yours! William Randolph Hearst – Your article couldn’t possibly outdo my fantastic headline today “FEEDING PRISONERS TO THE SHARKS!” If that doesn’t get the public’s attention, I don’t know what can! Joseph Pulitzer – Well, beat this Hearst....Tomorrow I plan to grasp America with this awesome headline: “BLOOD ON THE ROADSIDES, BLOOD IN THE FIELDS, BLOOD ON THE DOORSTEPS. BLOOD. BLOOD. BLOOD.” Pulitzer William Randolph Hearst – Well Joe, as lame as that headline is, I have to admit that it would certainly convince Americans that we need to go to war with Spain, even if it isn’t totally true. Despite you being my biggest rival, this might persuade them! Heck, I might believe you too! Narrator #2 – On February 15th at 9:40 p.m. a great explosion happened…. Newspaper Boy – EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT! American #3 – (Yells out loud to the crowd) HOLY COW! THE U.S.S. MAINE WAS SUNK! American #4 – WHAT?! How does an entire state get blown up!? American #3 – Noooooo, the U.S.S. Maine is a ship that we had in Havana harbor to protect our American investments and American lives in Cuba during the crazy Cuban revolt. American #4 – Who blew us up? Wait….What? American #3 – They didn’t blow US up, someone blew up our ship! But no one really knows who is responsible. American #4 – Those lousy Frenchmen did it. I know it! American #3 – What? FRANCE? Are you even reading the newspaper headlines? Obviously, the Spanish blew up the U.S.S. Maine to prevent the United States from getting involved in Spain’s colony. American #4 – Are you sure it was the Spanish who did it? American #3 – That’s what the newspaper headlines say. It HAS to be true! American #4 – I don’t know. Sometimes I wonder if they just make it all up. American #3 – How could you NOT believe everything you read? American #4 – I guess you’re right. I read the comics sometimes…they seem real to me. Narrator #2 – To this day, no one knows what caused the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine. However, the press and the public blamed Spain. With cries of “Remember the Maine,” Americans demanded revenge. SCENE 2 SUMMARY QUESTIONS 2a. What were the long-term causes of the U.S. going to war with Spain? __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2b. What was the immediate cause of the U.S. going to war with Spain? __________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USSYP 2013 Yearbook
    THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS DIRECTORS William Randolph Hearst III PRESIDENT James M. Asher Anissa B. Balson UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGRAM David J. Barrett Frank A. Bennack, Jr. John G. Conomikes Ronald J. Doerfl er Lisa H. Hagerman George R. Hearst III Gilbert C. Maurer Mark F. Miller Virginia H. Randt Steven R. Swartz Paul “Dino” Dinovitz EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR George B. Irish EASTERN DIRECTOR Rayne B. Guilford PROGRAM DIRECTOR FIFTY-FIRST ANNUAL WASHINGTON WEEK 2013 Lynn De Smet DEPUTY DIRECTOR Catherine Mahoney PROGRAM MANAGER Hayes Reisenfeld PROGRAM LIAISON UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGRAM FIFTY-FIRST ANNUAL WASHINGTON WEEK ! MARCH 9–16, 2013 SPONSORED BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE FUNDED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS 90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET ! SUITE 1212 ! SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105"4504 WWW.USSENATEYOUTH.ORG Photography by Jakub Mosur Secondary Photography by Erin Lubin Design by Catalone Design Co. USSYP_31_Yearbook_COV_052313_cc.indd 1 5/29/13 4:04 PM Forget conventionalisms; forget what the world thinks of you stepping out of your place; think your best thoughts, speak your best words, work your best works, looking to your own conscience for approval. SUSAN B. ANTHONY USSYP_31_Yearbook_COV_052313_cc.indd 2 5/24/13 3:33 PM 2013 UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGRAM SENATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE HONORARY CO-CHAIRS VICE PRESIDENT SENATOR SENATOR JOSEPH R. BIDEN HARRY REID MITCH McCONNELL President of the Senate Majority Leader Republican Leader CO-CHAIRS SENATOR JEANNE SENATOR SHAHEEN RICHARD BURR of New Hampshire of North Carolina
    [Show full text]
  • The School of Journalism Columbia University
    THE SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY REPORT TO THE EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH PULITZER ON THE COMPLETION OF THREE YEARS OF WORK NEW YORK 1915 SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Journalism Building, Columbia University. The gift of Joseph Pulitzer THE SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY REPORT TO THE EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH PULITZER ON THE COMPLETION OF THREE YEARS OF WORK SEPTEMBER I 5, I915 COMPILED BY FRANK D. FACKENTHAL Secretary of Columbia University NEW YORK I9IS CONTENTS I. Agreements 9 Agreement of April 10, 1903 9 Acceptance of July 20, 1903 12 Agreement of March 19, 1904 12 Agreement of April 12, 1904 16 II. Organization 18 The Advisory Board 18 Plan of Organization and Instruction 19 The Administrative Board 23 Amendment to the Statutes 23 III. The First Year 26 Teaching Staff 26 Courses of Instruction 28 The Curriculum 32 Students Registered and Graduated 33 IV. The Second Year 37 Teaching Staff 37 Courses of Instruction 38 Students Registered and Graduated 42 V. The Third Year 47 Teaching Staff 47 Courses of Instruction 48 Students Registered and Graduated 52 Minute on Completion of Third Year 57 VI. The Building and Equipment 58 Location of Building 58 Design and construction 58 Library Facilities 58 I AGREEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT, made the tenth day of April, 1903, between JOSEPH PULITZER, of the City of New Yorlc, hereinafter rijfS-red to as 'the Donor,' party of the first part, and THE TRUSTEES of COLUMBIA COLLEGE IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, hereinafter referred to
    [Show full text]
  • Part I: the Spanish-American War Ameican Continent
    Part I: The Spanish-American War rf he ro,d $ 1j.h would FventuaJly lead to Lhe lapa- Amedcans. extendiry U.S. conftol over the lush Gland I nese attack on fearl H"rbor ln l94l and ninety miles from the tip of Florida seemed only logi- Amedca's involvement in Vieham began in the hot cal. Cuba was often depicled as a choice piece of ituit sugar cane fields of Cuba over a century ago. which would naturally Iall into the yard oI iis pow- Cuba, the lar8esi island in the Caibbearr held ertul neighbor when tully iipe. special significance for policymakers in both Spain and the United States at the end of the 19ih c€ntury. lf is aut dcshnv lo hauc Cuba and it is to folly I For Spain, Cuba n'as the last majof remnant of whai debale lhe question. ll naluftll! bplong< la thp I had once been a huge empire in the New World. Ameican continent. I N€arly all of Spain s possessions in ihe Westem Hend- Douglas, 1860 presidential candidatu'l -StEhen sphere had been lost in the early 1800s. and Spain itself had sunk to the level of a third-raie European power. Nonetheless, the government in Maddd refused to RevoLutror'r rt{ Cual consider granting independence io Cuba - "the Pear] of the Antilles" - or seliing the island to anoiher In 186& a revolt against Spanish rule broke out in Cuba. Many of ihe leading rebels hoped to eventu' At the time, the country with ihe geatest inter- ally join the United Staies after breaking {ree fiom est in a.quirin8 Cuba wac LhF United Sidte-.
    [Show full text]
  • Ewspaper1 S Staff . Wins)F Ulitzer Prize
    ~~~ii!l!rr~ ., · .~·.\··'f . , ·.. · .. ... ,, ~ an ..J'raftritct Coanaiclt 3 eWspaper 1 s Staff_. Wins)f ulitzer Prize *Tues., Aprf 14, 198 1 I New York Publication was credited to the of international affairs for her The 29-member staff of the pf!rsistence of the Mrs. Toole. "I dispatches Jrom Central America. Longview (Wash.) Daily News won tried eight publishers and died eacti time' •hey returned it, because Mike Peters or' the Dayton the m8l Pulitzer Prize for general (Ohio) Daily News won the prize for reporUng y~rday for coverage of I really believed in it," she said yesterday. "I thought to myself, cartooning. Among cartoons specif· the et¥Ptions of Mount St. Helens. ically cited • was Qne . contrasting 'Th~ stupid publishers.' " The national reporting awa rd health warnings against saccharin But with the determination of 'with the lack of restrictions · on . ~nt. to John M. Crewdson of the N4fw York Times for his stories a proud · mother, she sent the pistols in this country. manuscript to novelist Walkei; Per­ about illegal alierts and immigra­ That cartoon featured a pic­ tion.-:· cy. He persuaded the Louisiana State University Press to publish it. ture of a pistol and a package of 'l'be Cha~lotte <N.CJ Obsenw A paperback version will be out saccharin. "This killed 9000 Ameri· took the gold medal for !\1eritorious soon. cans last year," read one section of the caption. "This killed.four \()bite Public Service for 2'l articles and 1 eigb(~torials calling attention to "I bad nothing else to live for," rats." it said of the saccharin.
    [Show full text]
  • Areas and Periods of Culture in the Greater Antilles Irving Rouse
    AREAS AND PERIODS OF CULTURE IN THE GREATER ANTILLES IRVING ROUSE IN PREHISTORIC TIME, the Greater Antilles were culturally distinct, differingnot only from Florida to the north and Yucatan to the west but also, less markedly,from the Lesser Antilles to the east and south (Fig. 1).1 Within this major provinceof culture,it has been customaryto treat each island or group FIG.1. Map of the Caribbeanarea. of islands as a separatearchaeological area, on the assumptionthat each contains its own variant of the Greater Antillean pattern of culture. J. Walter Fewkes proposedsuch an approachin 19152 and worked it out seven years later.3 It has since been adopted, in the case of specific islands, by Harrington,4Rainey,5 and the writer.6 1 Fewkes, 1922, p. 59. 2 Fewkes, 1915, pp. 442-443. 3 Fewkes, 1922, pp. 166-258. 4 Harrington, 1921. 5 Rainey, 1940. 6 Rouse, 1939, 1941. 248 VOL. 7, 1951 CULTURE IN THE GREATERANTILLES 249 Recent work in connectionwith the CaribbeanAnthropological Program of Yale University indicates that this approach is too limited. As the distinction between the two major groups of Indians in the Greater Antilles-the Ciboney and Arawak-has sharpened, it has become apparent that the areas of their respectivecultures differ fundamentally,with only the Ciboney areas correspond- ing to Fewkes'conception of distributionby islands.The Arawak areascut across the islands instead of enclosing them and, moreover,are sharply distinct during only the second of the three periods of Arawak occupation.It is the purpose of the presentarticle to illustratethese points and to suggest explanationsfor them.
    [Show full text]
  • Mason Williams
    City of Ambition: Franklin Roosevelt, Fiorello La Guardia, and the Making of New Deal New York Mason Williams Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Mason Williams All Rights Reserved Abstract City of Ambition: Franklin Roosevelt, Fiorello La Guardia, and the Making of New Deal New York Mason Williams This dissertation offers a new account of New York City’s politics and government in the 1930s and 1940s. Focusing on the development of the functions and capacities of the municipal state, it examines three sets of interrelated political changes: the triumph of “municipal reform” over the institutions and practices of the Tammany Hall political machine and its outer-borough counterparts; the incorporation of hundreds of thousands of new voters into the electorate and into urban political life more broadly; and the development of an ambitious and capacious public sector—what Joshua Freeman has recently described as a “social democratic polity.” It places these developments within the context of the national New Deal, showing how national officials, responding to the limitations of the American central state, utilized the planning and operational capacities of local governments to meet their own imperatives; and how national initiatives fed back into subnational politics, redrawing the bounds of what was possible in local government as well as altering the strength and orientation of local political organizations. The dissertation thus seeks not only to provide a more robust account of this crucial passage in the political history of America’s largest city, but also to shed new light on the history of the national New Deal—in particular, its relation to the urban social reform movements of the Progressive Era, the long-term effects of short-lived programs such as work relief and price control, and the roles of federalism and localism in New Deal statecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis-1972D-C289o.Pdf (5.212Mb)
    OKLAHOMA'S UNITED STATES HOUSE DELEGATION AND PROGRESSIVISM, 1901-1917 By GEORGE O. CARNE~ // . Bachelor of Arts Central Missouri State College Warrensburg, Missouri 1964 Master of Arts Central Missouri State College Warrensburg, Missouri 1965 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 1972 OKLAHOMA STATE UNiVERSITY LIBRARY MAY 30 1973 ::.a-:r...... ... ~·· .. , .• ··~.• .. ,..,,.·· ,,.,., OKLAHOMA'S UNITED STATES HOUSE DELEGATION AND PROGRESSIVIS~, 1901-1917 Thesis Approved: Oean of the Graduate College PREFACE This dissertation is a study for a single state, Oklahoma, and is designed to test the prevailing Mowry-Chandler-Hofstadter thesis concerning progressivism. The "progressive profile" as developed in the Mowry-Chandler-Hofstadter thesis characterizes the progressive as one who possessed distinctive social, economic, and political qualities that distinguished him from the non-progressive. In 1965 in a political history seminar at Central Missouri State College, Warrensburg, Missouri, I tested the above model by using a single United States House representative from the state of Missouri. When I came to the Oklahoma State University in 1967, I decided to expand my test of this model by examining the thirteen representatives from Oklahoma during the years 1901 through 1917. In testing the thesis for Oklahoma, I investigated the social, economic, and political characteristics of the members whom Oklahoma sent to the United States House of Representatives during those years, and scrutinized the role they played in the formulation of domestic policy. In addition, a geographical analysis of the various Congressional districts suggested the effects the characteristics of the constituents might have on the representatives.
    [Show full text]
  • William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner
    The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner by Dante Joseph Basista Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2019 The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner Dante Joseph Basista I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Dante Basista, Student Date Approvals: Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Martha Pallante, Committee Member Date Dr. Donna DeBlasio, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT This is a study of the correspondence and published writings of three-time Democratic Presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan in relation to his role in the anti-imperialist movement that opposed the US acquisition of the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico following the Spanish-American War. Historians have disagreed over whether Bryan was genuine in his opposition to an American empire in the 1900 presidential election and have overlooked the period following the election in which Bryan’s editorials opposing imperialism were a major part of his weekly newspaper, The Commoner. The argument is made that Bryan was authentic in his opposition to imperialism in the 1900 presidential election, as proven by his attention to the issue in the two years following his election loss.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispute Elections of 1876 and 2000
    System Breakdown: The Dispute Elections of 1876 and 2000 Author: Kristina Pflanz Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/392 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2005 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. 1 Table of Contents Author’s Preface 2 1 Introduction 4 2 Election of 1876 9 3 Presidency of Rutherford B. Hayes 31 4 Election of 2000 38 5 Presidency of George W. Bush 83 6 Conclusion 91 Appendix I: Electoral College Map 1876 98 Appendix II: Electoral College Map 2000 101 Appendix III: Palm Beach Ballot, Florida County Map 104 Appendix IV: Chronology of Election 2000 106 Works Cited 109 2 Author’s Preface That “crazy election” wa s the event that stood out the most during my s enior year of high school in 2000 -2001. I was only seventeen years old at the time of the election, and therefore could not vote in it. But even though I was not eligible to participate in the election, I – along with the rest of the country – was completely mesmerized as the post-election events unfolded. Although I tried to keep up with everything, I soon became confused by all the different lawsuits and what their results meant. After Bush v. Gore was re vealed on December 12, I was disappointed by the result but not surprised – George W. Bush had been the presumptive winner, and that had not changed since the day after Election Day . The finality that December 12 brought, however, did not change my sentim ents: why didn’t my guy win? I had read many newspaper articles that told of voter disenfranchisement in Palm Beach County and questionable legality of Bush votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Artist's Work Lets Cubans Speak out in Havana for Freedom
    Artist's work lets Cubans speak out in Havana for freedom By FABIOLA SANTIAGO A packed performance art show at the 10th Havana Biennial, a prestigious international festival, turned into a clamor of ''Libertad!'' as Cubans and others took to a podium to protest the lack of freedom of expression on the island. The provocative performance Sunday night, recorded and posted Monday on YouTube, was staged by acclaimed Cuban artist Tania Bruguera, a frequent visitor to Art Basel Miami Beach who lives in Havana. Bruguera set up a podium with a microphone in front of a red curtain at the Wifredo Lam Center, an official art exhibition space and biennial venue. Two actors clad in the military fatigue uniforms of the Ministry of the Interior, the agency charged with spying on Cubans' activities, flanked the podium and carried a white dove. Bruguera let people from the standing-room only audience come to the microphone for no more than one minute. As people spoke, the white dove was placed on their shoulders by the actors. ''Let's stop waiting for permission to use the Internet,'' urged Yoani Sánchez, who has written a controversial award-winning ''Generación Y'' blog chronicling Cuban life under constant threats from the government. ''Libertad! Libertad!'' shouted one man. ''Too many years of covering the sun with one finger,'' said another. To every call for freedom, the audience responded with shouts of ``Bravo!'' The performance appeared to mock a historic Jan. 8, 1959, victory speech by Fidel Castro at which a white dove landed on his shoulder, viewed by many as a sign of divine recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Unions in the 1890S: the Case of the New Hampshire Shoe Industry
    IRLE IRLE WORKING PAPER #17-89 March 1989 The Impact of Unions In The 1890s: The Case of The New Hampshire Shoe Industry Steven Maddox and Barry Eichengreen Cite as: Steven Maddox and Barry Eichengreen. (1989). “The Impact of Unions In The 1890s: The Case of The New Hampshire Shoe Industry.” IRLE Working Paper No. 17-89. http://irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers/17-89.pdf irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers Institute for Research on Labor and Employment UC Berkeley Title: The Impact of Unions in the 1890's: The Case of the New Hampshire Shoe Industry Author: Maddox, Steven, University of Virginia Eichengreen, Barry, University of California, Berkeley Publication Date: 03-01-1989 Series: Working Paper Series Publication Info: Working Paper Series, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UC Berkeley Permalink: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5mh1p30m Keywords: Maddox, Eichengreen, New Hampshire, shoe industry, unions Copyright Information: All rights reserved unless otherwise indicated. Contact the author or original publisher for any necessary permissions. eScholarship is not the copyright owner for deposited works. Learn more at http://www.escholarship.org/help_copyright.html#reuse eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. The Impact of Unions in the 1890s: The Case of the New Hampshire Shoe Industry Steven Maddox University of Virginia Barry Eichengreen University of California, Berkeley We are grateful to Mary Blewett for advice and assistance in categorizing shoe industry occupations, and to Professor Blewett, Susan Carter and Stanley Engerman for helpful comments. Since John Commons's History of Labor in America, the overwhelming majority of histories of the American labor movement have depicted 19th century unionism as little more than the ideological seed from which modern American unionism grew.
    [Show full text]
  • Statue of LIBERTY HISTORICAL HANDBOOK NUMBER ELEVEN
    Statue of LIBERTY HISTORICAL HANDBOOK NUMBER ELEVEN This publication is one of a series of handbooks describing the his­ torical and archeological areas in the National Park System administered by the National Park Service of the United States Department of the Interior. It is printed by the Government Printing Office, and may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Washington 25, D. C. Price 30 cents Statue of Liberty NATIONAL MONUMENT Bedloe's Island, New York by Benjamin Levine and Isabelle F. Story NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL HANDBOOK SERIES NO. 11 Washington, D. C, 1952 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director Contents Page AN IDEA IS BORN 2 PLAN APPROVED AND FUND RAISING UNDERTAKEN 5 De Laboulaye Heads Franco-American Union 5 The American Committee 6 Joseph Pulitzer - 7 CONSTRUCTION OF THE STATUE . 11 CONSTRUCTION OF THE PEDESTAL 13 COMPLETION AND PRESENTATION OF THE STATUE 17 TRANSPORTATION AND DEDICATION OF THE STATUE 20 IMPROVEMENTS IN THE STATUE SINCE 1886 21 The Lighting System 21 The Torch Redesigned 26 The Elevator 26 Structural Improvements 26 DIMENSIONS OF THE STATUE 27 BARTHOLDI THE MAN 28 FRENCH AID IN AMERICAN REVOLUTION BASIS OF LONG INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP 29 EARLY HISTORY OF BEDLOE'S ISLAND 31 GUIDE TO THE STATUE 32 THE NATIONAL MONUMENT 36 HOW TO REACH THE MONUMENT 37 ADMINISTRATION 38 VISITOR FACILITIES 38 RELATED AREAS 39 HE STATUE OF LIBERTY ENLIGHTENING THE WORLD was Conceived and designed as a symbol of a great international friendship. With Tthe passing of the years its significance has deepened until today it is the most symbolic structure in the United States.
    [Show full text]