DOCSLIB.ORG

The Introduced Fishes, Ga and Game and Fur-Bearing of Utah

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Introduced Fishes, Ga and Game and Fur-Bearing of Utah THE INTRODUCED FISHES, GA AND GAME AND FUR-BEARING OF UTAH BORIS HEWITT POPOV LIBRARY UTAH STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE From mm^zmm Call N0....3.7X..2,... Ace. No..:....::... MERRILL LI / SPECIAL COLLECTlOf MICROFORM TRJ USU THESES AND 1914-19" \ m* DATE DUE Mr s -fer ~ imr IBSTfaio tj mi^s FEB 1 8 1959 iAPR 0 m§ . •••• ?*~ MAY 1 3 tft- _J ^—^ F*B I 4 WOl/j 186^ TEE INTRODUCED FISHES, GAME BX1DS, AND SAMS AID Ftm-BEAHIHG MAMMALS OP UTAH by Boris Hewitt Popov A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Seienee in Zoology Utah State Agricultural College '"" 1049 o ?•& *• Approved? iZ&£L Major Professor, ~ty Head of Departaen Dean or Graauate School ' t t • < ( < [; f ' < * < < c- c c ' i 1 I 1 t < < ' i 3 7/'2- - Acknowledgement I wish to express my appreciation to Dr» Patms H» Hsamond, to Dr. William P. Sigler, to Dr. Wayne Blnns, and to Prof. Hubert W. Smith for their suggestions .and criticisms in preparing this thesis.. I acknowledge also the kind coopera­ tion and help of Director Randall B, Turpln, Mr Marion Madsen, Mr. Jay Udy, Mr. Clifton Greenhalgh, and Mr. D. M. Gaufln of the Dtah State Fish and Game Department, Thanks are due t>r* Jessop S. Low who, besides helping t© select the problem, has served as thesis director. • I acknowledge further the help, suggestions, and inform­ ation proffered by the following individuals; Dr. Angus M. Woodbury and Dr. William Behle of the University of Utah? Dr. ¥asco M. Tanner of Brigham Young University| Mr. David H» Madsen, Mr. G. R. Walker, Mr* John B# Dooly, Jr., Mr. Jim Smyth, Mr. tf, B« 01well* Mr. A. If. Creamer, Mr. Arthur Ulllecan, and Mr* Anthony Lund all of Salt Lake City? ir. Earl Anderson of Brigham City? Mr. lewell Cook of Mantuaj Irs. Bruce A. Hartman of West Jordan; Mr. George Cox of Lehif Mr. Arnold Christensen of Bear River Cltyj and to all of the game wardens throughout the state of Utah, TABI3 OF COWTTS Page INTRODUCTION. , .<••***.«».»«».«« • 1 FISHES.»•.*»..•»»*».»*»*»•.»••»..*«»»*»..**•»»•#•**»••• $ Introduc ^xon.........*••»...•****••••**•**»«.#... 5 AMERICAiM wfi&D.«.............*.*• ...#...».»».»... ••. 5 CHUM SALMON*•••••••»•»•••*••#«•••»«••»•••»»••*•*• iiILVJ&R CALMQ Jl• *•».*,*»...*#..»»**»«».•»»•»••»»**»*»• 14 20 KIMG tsALMOji»*»•••«»*•«*»»»»»»»•#»*•»»'•»••**»»»•*•» 25 SEBAGG SALMGB««*«•»••«.**»«.«.««......*...*...... RAIMBO'ft StOUT»»»•*..•••*•••••»«*•»»»*•*»*»*»**»•»• 56 GUXJDLSI TROUT. •»»..... •..#.*..*.....*.*» • . ....... 42 BRQ«vM j?flOUl*.«...#*«* .«##****..*.»**«.* «.*«.«»«•. 45 LAKE IRO U i....... 4 ...... * . .......... ....... 49 EASTERN BROOK TROUT............ 54 LAKE Will AEEISH* ».••«*»*.**..»»**»»*«•»*»*»»•.»..»» 61 AMBRICAt? GRAYLIIG•••••.,»«*«••««••..•••••....»••• 64 AMERICAN EEL..........*........•.....•..«».*»••.. 69 sfOuIj'tfx SB • . * . ...*.* • * . » . ......... * # # 72 UARi.*.».•.**«««*«•.*.•.»«....«.*..*»«**•««*.*««. 74 CHANNEL CA J-FIKJII. ....«...*.«...-....*....*........«•. 79 Sulv& BuhLHfcAP. * . • . ..... • • . » ............ » * . 84 YELLOW PERCH»**»«•«••*•»*•»•»«••»».*»«»».**••.»•• 89 SMALLMOUTH BLACK BASS............................ 94 LARGEMOUTH BLACK BASS . -# ••*••*•*•.*.*••••• • . • . • • 97 GREEN SUNFISH.•«•««•..*«*«*«*#«*.••.»*.*««•»..».. 104 BLUiiiGILL . * ........... * . ........ ...... * . 108 ROCK BAti-S»«•*»*«.**»•••»»»»«•»««•*»»»•»•»»*»•»*»» HA BJUACK CKAPPIE. • •••«.••».•«••.•**»*••.•••»•»»*«*»•» Ho GAKE BXICDsS»»*.*•*»««»••»»•*».».•#•.«.*•***»*»*»*#«.••• 119 Introduction.... *..............••»••...*»*.....•« 119 HUNGARIAN PARTRIDGE 120 CHUKAR PARTRIDGE 126 B0BW1ITTE QUAIL• ••....•*..•.*•.•<».»*»*«•»•«...<•• 132 CALIFORNIA QUAIL.*•»**«•»••.**».»»»»•*»«»..*»»•»»• 138 RING-NECKED PHEASANT 144 iii4.iji} x uii&Ex ........................... *. ......... J.o4 GAME AND FOB-BEARING MAMMALS 161 In L.roc.uc tion .««*».««*»««..»»*.«.*«**«.*..««***.*« 161 JUAiiJi MUSARAI..................................... xv<d ft Li i.'1'i.Iii. ................ # ........ • . 166 AW xEL 01 E» * . • . * * . ........ » . ...... 183 x, ui'.. Aij v. »».**•**»»»•»»*»«*»•.»«»-•*»»..*«»*»»*»*»» xyo w» xjiiifcAfii .»...»«*•.....*...»*».»...#.•.»*...»....*»..... x y 7 TABLES A*TP TIQW Tables Page 1. SHAD MY INTRODUCTIONS IN UTAH. 8 2, SILVER SALMON PRY IMTRODUCTIONS IN UTAH........ 3. KING SALMOH FRY INTRODUCTIONS II UTAE 27 \187w—137»;................. 4. 170 NUTRIA INTRODUCTION IN UTAH......... 5* 176 ELF. IN TRODUCTIOBS IN UTAH 6. 178 ELK TRA3S PLANTS IN UTAH. 7. WTfSLSPE INTRODUCTIONS AND TRANSPLANTS 186 IN UTAH*• »*.»«•»*»**•••*.**.* Figures 1 * AMERI CAJS SHAD. * . • **.**•*««• . ...... «««»•....«... § 9 2 « SILVER SALMON• »*»».«»»»•*»**»#**•***•*»»**«•»•»« 18 3. ROKAHEiit. « »..•..* . ..*..**«....... ......... ... 23 4 . A. Hf G SALMON * » * » **••***..**#* » » . » . • . • « . * . 29 5• RAINBOW TROUT*...a.*.........*............*.... 40 6 • BROWN TRQU? T». ...*....... ..*«.......•».• .•••...• 47 7. LAKE TROUT.*......•....•......•..•............. 52 8. EASTERN BROOK TROUT 58 9 . AMERICAN GRAYLING. 67 10. CARP.«••..«»...«...«*...«*«*...••«.•........*»• 77 11* CHANNEL CATFISH. ....•»»•.»«»...»»«.•«......... 82 12* BLACK BULLHEAD*•#.««••»«..a...................* 87 13* YELLOW PERCH. ....««..»......»..«.*•».«.»*....*. 92 14. LARGE10UTH BLACK BASS*.... 101 IS* GREEis SUNfltiH* *#*.*.... ............. ......10 6 16. BL OEGILL *.*.•»*«.*..«».*.«««•«**.«.«*.««**«**.« 110 17* BLACK CHAPPIE*.«*«««»««.*«««.•..*«*««***««««•*# 117 18. HUNGARIAN PARTRIDGE,......, 124 19. CHUKAR PARTRIDGE....,.*.*. 130 20. BOBwHILbt S4UAIL*.***.*.*».*...............,..... 136 21. CALIFORNIA QUAIL..........*.*.................. 142 22. RING-NECKED PHEASANT 151 23 * iiTLit} TURKEY* * . * ..*,*.. ....,.••,... ....... * . ,. 159 24* DARK MUSKEAT. *.•*..........*...,...<*..•.,..,•. 164 25 . wU TRIA ****** **.«••***.*«.«.****...*«.., ••...•,•• 171 26. ELK* *»..*...*.....*..*.*......«*•«*. ..*...*•«... 180 27. AN TELOPE*•»*«•««*.•*.«**»**••«........*.......« 18© 28. BUFFALO*......*.•.,»«•..»»»..,»*»«....•»•».,••» 195 Introdue fcion For a number of years wildlife workers have realised the importance of the past histories of introduced species. ;;,u :;liasis in recent years has been directed toward Introduc­ tions because of the tremendous hunting and fishing pressures* Yearly increases in numbers of hunters and fishermen have been noted In Utah for the past forty years* It is hoped that this compilation of the histories of the Introduced game and fish species of Utah will be of value to sportsmen and wildlife managers alike in planning future introductions. The material Included in this paper was obtained from United States Government reports, Utah Territorial, reports* Utah State reports, newspapers and periodicals, personal interviews, and wardens* questionaires* The United States Government reports used included Bureau of Fisheries reports from 1870 to 1939, and Fish and Wildlife Service reports from 1940 to 1948. Utah Territorial reports covered the period from 1850 to 1895, and Utah State reports covered the time from 1896 until the present* Mewspapers used in the search for material Included the Deseret Evening News from 1860 to 1915, the Deseret News Weekly from 1870 to 1900, the Salt Lake Tribune from 1915 to 1948, and the Ogden Standard Examiner from 1930 to 1940, Other periodicals searched were the Journal History of the L..D.S. Church, the Transactions of the Utah Academy of Arts, Sciences, and Letters, and the Utah Educational Review* An effort was made to personally interview all present and former officials, now living, of the Utah State Fish and c Game Department, Also j^soaaally contacted were sportsmen and wliulifo federation officers kuown to haves fetes* active in fish sod ^uiuc work. i..ost of the- data necessary to plut the maps accompanying this paper were obtained from questionaires sent to all wardens in the state* Distribution maps have been \cxified by officials of the Utah State Fish and uame Depart­ ment* It is realised that the exact dates and circumstances pertaining to some of the early introductions are somewhat confused* however, an effort has been made to include only material which appears to be subs tun Hated with facts and referene&s. It is possible that in some eases introductions were made prior to those Indicated herein as first introduc­ tions* It is also possible that in some instances early workers may have used Incorrect scientific and common names. In most cas&s, however, It is felt that the materials and figures included in this paper are reasonably accurate* Throughout the paper the fish, game birds, and game and fur-bearing mammals will be treated in phylogenetic sequence. FIIMES In traduction Early settlers In Utah found cutthroat trout W&& whito- flSh tsme&WM tM many of the stro&ms and lakos of the terri­ tory. These fish furnished an Important part of the diets of these early settlers. Year round fishing and unrestricted Miods of taking fisa greatly reduced the numbers of these native fishes. At an L.D.S, Church Convention held In Salt Lake City in 1870, a committee on fish propagation was set up* This committee was composed of A. M* kusser, A* P* koekwood, Broker Petit, and Reuben Mitchell. Two of these men, Kusser and Rockwood, wore later very active In early introductions of exotic fish into Utah.* Most early fish introductions were mad© primarily for the purpose of increasing the food supply of the territory. A program for the propagation and distribution of food fishes was inaugurated If the United States Pish Commission in 1872. Until !£•• the majority of the fish introductions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WDFW Washington State Status Report for the Bald Eagle
    STATE OF WASHINGTON October 2001 WashingtonWashington StateState StatusStatus ReportReport forfor thethe BaldBald EagleEagle by Derek W. Stinson, James W. Watson and Kelly R. McAllister Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE Wildlife Program WDFW 759 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife maintains a list of endangered, threatened and sensitive species (Washington Administrative Codes 232-12-014 and 232-12-011, Appendix I). In 1990, the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission adopted listing procedures developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies (Washington Administrative Code 232-12-297, Appendix I). The procedures include how species listing will be initiated, criteria for listing and delisting, public review and recovery and management of listed species. The first step in the process is to develop a preliminary species status report. The report includes a review of information relevant to the species’ status in Washington and addresses factors affecting its status including, but not limited to: historic, current, and future species population trends, natural history including ecological relationships, historic and current habitat trends, population demographics and their relationship to long term sustainability, and historic and current species management activities. The procedures then provide for a 90-day public review opportunity for interested parties to submit new scientific data relevant to the draft status report and classification recommendation. During the 90-day review period, the Department held three public meetings to take comments and answer questions. The Department has now completed the final status report, listing recommendation and State Environmental Policy Act findings for presentation to the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 AIM Program
    A Message from ASABE President Maury Salz Welcome to the 2019 Annual International Meeting (AIM) of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers in Boston, Massachusetts. I extend a special welcome to first time participants, international attendees and pre-professionals. I am confident you will find the meeting a welcoming and stimulating investment of your time. AIM offers a wide array of opportunities for you to gain knowledge in technical sessions, make new or catch-up with old friends at social events, contribute to the ongoing growth efforts in technical communities, and to celebrate the accomplishments of peers in the awards ceremonies. I highly encourage you to engage in the opening keynote session by GreenBiz’s Joel Makower and the following panel discussion on sustainability and the need for a national strategy, which could alter how we live. We as individuals, and collectively as ASABE, will be challenged to think about how this broader vision of sustainability could fundamentally change our lives and the profession. I want to thank our friends at Cornell University for serving as local hosts and the volunteer coordinators. Students work as volunteers to enhance the experience for all meeting participants and you can locate them by their blue shirts. Please thank them when you have the chance. Boston is rich in history and be sure to take some time to experience what this unique area has to offer. I also encourage you to participate actively in AIM and reflect on how you can advance the Society goals to benefit yourself personally and the people of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 1 8(2): 143—1 86
    2009. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 1 8(2): 143—1 86 THE "LOST" JORDAN AND HAY FISH COLLECTION AT BUTLER UNIVERSITY Carter R. Gilbert: Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 USA ABSTRACT. A large fish collection, preserved in ethanol and assembled by Drs. David S. Jordan and Oliver P. Hay between 1875 and 1892, had been stored for over a century in the biology building at Butler University. The collection was of historical importance since it contained some of the earliest fish material ever recorded from the states of South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi and Kansas, and also included types of many new species collected during the course of this work. In addition to material collected by Jordan and Hay, the collection also included specimens received by Butler University during the early 1880s from the Smithsonian Institution, in exchange for material (including many types) sent to that institution. Many ichthyologists had assumed that Jordan, upon his departure from Butler in 1879. had taken the collection. essentially intact, to Indiana University, where soon thereafter (in July 1883) it was destroyed by fire. The present study confirms that most of the collection was probably transferred to Indiana, but that significant parts of it remained at Butler. The most important results of this study are: a) analysis of the size and content of the existing Butler fish collection; b) discovery of four specimens of Micropterus coosae in the Saluda River collection, since the species had long been thought to have been introduced into that river; and c) the conclusion that none of Jordan's 1878 southeastern collections apparently remain and were probably taken intact to Indiana University, where they were lost in the 1883 fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Catfish Review Life-History, Distribution, Invasion Dynamics and Current Management Strategies in the Pacific Northwest
    Channel Catfish Review Life-history, distribution, invasion dynamics and current management strategies in the Pacific Northwest Thomas K Pool University of Washington Figure 1 Illustration of a channel catfish by Ted Walke (http://www.fish.state.pa.us/pafish/chancatm.jpg) Figure 2 Thomas L. Wellborn SRAC Publication No. 180 http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/huntwild/wild/species/ccf/) Figure 3 Channel catfish: Note the barbels Figure 4 Channel catfish: Characteristic deeply forked located near the mouth© George tail © George Burgess (http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu) Burgess(http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu) All information in this report was compiled in November, 2007. Current distribution maps and background information may be outdated at this time. Diagnostic information 1a) Adipose fin a flag-like fleshy lobe, well- separated from caudal fin; tail squared, rounded, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818) or forked; adults to over 24 inches Kingdom Animalia-- animals 1b) Adipose fin long, low, and 'keel-like', nearly Phylum Chordata-- chordates continuous with caudal fin; tail squared or Subphylum Vertebrata-- vertebrates rounded; adults small, never over 6 inches Superclass Osteichthyes-- bony fishes 2a) Tail deeply-forked, lobes pointed; anal fin Class Actinopterygii-- ray-finned fishes, spiny with 24 to 30 rays; bony ridge connecting skull rayed fishes and origin of dorsal fin; head relatively small Subclass Neopterygii-- neopterygians and narrow; young with small spots, larger Infraclass Teleostei adults blue-black in color without spots channel Superorder Ostariophysi catfish Ictalurus punctatus Order Siluriformes-- catfishes Family Ictaluridae Overview Genus Ictalurus Species Ictalurus punctatus Channel catfish are often grey or silver in color and can be one of the largest catfish species with a maximum size up to 915 mm and Basic identification 13 kg.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Habits of Blue Catfish (Ictalurus Furcatus) Introduced Into
    FOOD HABITS OF BLUE CATFISH (ICTALURUS FURCATUS) INTRODUCED INTO LAKE OCONEE, GEORGIA by GEOFFREY EARL MITCHELL (Under the Direction of Cecil A. Jennings) ABSTRACT Blue Catfish are native to the Coosa river drainage in northwest Georgia, but were discovered outside this range (in Lake Oconee) in 1997. In Lake Oconee, their abundance and growth rates have increased dramatically, but their food habits are unknown. Therefore, food habits of Blue Catfish were determined by examining the stomachs of 808 specimens from Lake Oconee’s upper and lower regions during all seasons from summer 2012 to summer 2013. Stomach contents were analyzed using the Index of Relative Importance. The dominant seasonal prey item was Asian Clams (Corbicula fluminea; 98%) during the summer, Asian Clams (46%) in the fall, Mayflies (Ephemeroptera; 23%) in the winter, and Mayflies (84%) in the spring. The results show that the diet of introduced Blue Catfish in Lake Oconee, Georgia, is omnivorous. More importantly, the results also show that they are not preying intensely on native bi-valves and fishes. INDEX WORDS: Diet, index of relative importance, Lake Oconee FOOD HABITS OF BLUE CATFISH (ICTALURUS FURCATUS) INTRODUCED INTO LAKE OCONEE, GEORGIA by GEOFFREY EARL MITCHELL B.S., The University of California, 2011 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2015 ©2015 Geoffrey Earl Mitchell All Rights Reserved FOOD HABITS OF BLUE CATFISH (ICTALURUS FURCATUS) INTRODUCED INTO LAKE OCONEE, GEORGIA by GEOFFREY EARL MITCHELL Major Professor: Cecil A. Jennings Committee: Michael T.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Catfishes of Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico
    ISSN Printed: 0034-7744 ISSN digital: 2215-2075 Morphometry and meristics of two species of Ictalurus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae), native catfishes of Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico Gorgonio Ruiz-Campos1*, Alejandro Varela-Romero2, David Ceseña-Gallegos1, Carlos Alonso Ballesteros-Córdova1,2 & Sergio Sánchez-Gonzáles3 1. Colección Ictiológica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Carretera Transpeninsular Ensenada-Tijuana No. 3917, Colonia Playitas, Ensenada, Baja California, México, 22860; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2. Departamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de la Universidad de Sonora, Boulevard Luis Encinas y Rosales s/n, Hermosillo, Sonora, México, 83000; [email protected] 3. Facultad de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Sinaloa, México, 80010; [email protected] * Correspondence Received 13-VIII-2019. Corrected 27-II-2020. Accepted 04-III-2020. ABSTRACT. Introduction: Morphotypes of native catfish of the genus Ictalurus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) are known to occur in allopatry in the northern Sierra Madre Occidental of Mexico, with only the Yaqui catfish (Ictalurus pricei) taxonomically described. Recent genetic analysis of these morphotypes has revealed the monophyly of the I. pricei complex, which indicates Ictalurus sp. from the Culiacán River and San Lorenzo River basins as its nearest genetic relative and recognizes as an evolutionarily significant unit the Culiacán River and San Lorenzo River morphotypes. Objective: To compare the meristic and morphometric characteristics of the catfish of the Culiacán River basin with its nearest genetic relative, the Yaqui catfish, in order to determine the presence of distinctive morphological characters that support genetic evidence previously reported for these morphotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • CYP3) Family in Actinopterygii (Ray- Finned Fish
    Molecular Evolution and Functional Divergence of the Cytochrome P450 3 (CYP3) Family in Actinopterygii (Ray- Finned Fish) Jun Yan1,2, Zhonghua Cai1,2* 1 Departments of Biological Science and Biotechnology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, 2 Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China Abstract Background: The cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily is a multifunctional hemethiolate enzyme that is widely distributed from Bacteria to Eukarya. The CYP3 family contains mainly the four subfamilies CYP3A, CYP3B, CYP3C and CYP3D in vertebrates; however, only the Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish) have all four subfamilies and detailed understanding of the evolutionary relationship of Actinopterygii CYP3 family members would be valuable. Methods and Findings: Phylogenetic relationships were constructed to trace the evolutionary history of the Actinopterygii CYP3 family genes. Selection analysis, relative rate tests and functional divergence analysis were combined to interpret the relationship of the site-specific evolution and functional divergence in the Actinopterygii CYP3 family. The results showed that the four CYP3 subfamilies in Actinopterygii might be formed by gene duplication. The first gene duplication event was responsible for divergence of the CYP3B/C clusters from ancient CYP3 before the origin of the Actinopterygii, which corresponded to the fish-specific whole genome duplication (WGD). Tandem repeat duplication in each of the homologue clusters produced stable CYP3B, CYP3C, CYP3A and CYP3D subfamilies. Acceleration of asymmetric evolutionary rates and purifying selection together were the main force for the production of new subfamilies and functional divergence in the new subset after gene duplication, whereas positive selection was detected only in the retained CYP3A subfamily.
    [Show full text]
  • BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT GOALS and OBJECTIVES 2004 - 2019 Adopted by MDIFW Commissioner and Advisory Council September 23, 2004
    BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2004 - 2019 Adopted by MDIFW Commissioner and Advisory Council September 23, 2004 Population Goal Increase the population and expand the range of breeding bald eagles in Maine. Population Objective: By 2019, increase the bald eagle population to at least 600 nesting pairs, and allow the population to naturally expand statewide. Productivity Objective: Maintain a statewide minimum productivity of 9 fledged eaglets per 10 occupied breeding areas through 2019. Habitat Goal Identify, maintain, and enhance bald eagle breeding, foraging, and wintering habitat to allow for future expansion of the bald eagle population in Maine. Habitat Objective 1: By 2019, ensure long-term protection of viable bald eagle nesting habitat through fee ownership, easements, and landowner agreements for a minimum of 300 nest sites, proportionately distributed throughout occupied range. Habitat Objective 2: By 2019, promote private stewardship of 300 additional viable bald eagle nest sites through landowner agreements, outreach, tax credits, or other means. Habitat Objective 3: By 2008, determine the amount and distribution of shoreline habitat that is currently protected for feeding, wintering, and future nesting sites for bald eagles, and determine the amount of additional shoreline that needs to be protected to ensure the viability of 600 nesting pairs of eagles in Maine. Recovery Safeguard Goal Safeguard recovery of Maine’s bald eagle population through outreach and education and through establishing de-listing and re-listing strategies. Outreach Objective: By 2006, develop, and begin implementing, an outreach program that increases the understanding and appreciation of bald eagles and their habitat requirements in Maine, and increases awareness of human- related activities that result in bald eagle deaths, injuries, reproductive failures, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ictalurus Punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818)
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque, 1818) I. Identity V. Status And Trends a. Biological Features VI. Main Issues b. Images Gallery a. Responsible Aquaculture Practices II. Profile VII. References a. Historical Background a. Related Links b. Main Producer Countries c. Habitat And Biology III. Production a. Production Cycle b. Production Systems c. Diseases And Control Measures IV. Statistics a. Production Statistics b. Market And Trade Identity Ictalurus punctatus Rafinesque, 1818 [Ictaluridae] FAO Names: En - Channel catfish, Fr - Barbue de rivière, Es - Bagre de canal Biological features Cylindrical body with skin lacking in scales; spots on the sides. Soft fin rays with exception of dorsal and pectoral fins which have spines. Adipose fin present. Barbels located below and at the corners of the mouth, with two barbels on the dorsal surface of the head anterior of the eyes and posterior of the snout. Deeply forked caudal fin and curved anal fin with 24-29 rays. Images gallery FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Catfish pond Catfish fry Catfish raceway Wood spawning container 13-inch catfish (courtesy www.combat-fishing.com) Hatching Catfish Profile Historical background Interest in channel catfish began when the United States Fish and Fisheries Commission began stocking fish collected from the wild in the 1870s. Channel catfish were native primarily to the Mississippi River Valley but were widely introduced throughout the nation by the Commission. Spawning was first achieved in 1890 in aquaria, at which time it was learned that the male guards the eggs during incubation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Evolutionary Origin of Barbels in the Channel
    THE DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTIONARY ORIGIN OF BARBELS IN THE CHANNEL CATFISH ICTALURUS PUNCTATUS (SILURIFORMES: ICTALURIDAE) by MICHAEL BRENT HAWKINS B.A., University of Colorado, 2008 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master’s of Arts Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 2011 This thesis entitled: The development and evolutionary origin of barbels in the channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) written by Michael Brent Hawkins has been approved for the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology David W. Stock, committee co-chair Alexander Cruz, committee co-chair Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we Find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards Of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. Hawkins, Michael Brent (M.A., Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) The development and evolutionary origin of barbels in the channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Siluriformes: Ictaluridae) Thesis co-directed by Professor Alexander Cruz and Associate Professor David Stock Understanding the origin of morphological novelties is an important goal of evolutionary developmental biology. In pursuit of this goal, we have examined the developmental genetic mechanisms that underlie growth and patterning in a largely overlooked group of morphological novelties: the barbels of fishes. Barbels are appendages that project from the head region in a large and disparate assortment of fish taxa, ranging from hagfishes to gobies. They often bear sensory organs and can be supported by a rod of connective tissue, muscle, cartilage, or bone.
    [Show full text]
  • Tctalurid Ca-Rfisi-"Tes of the UN·Tted STATES by Kenneth Relyea, P~~D
    tCTALURID cA-rFISI-"tES oF THE UN·tTED STATES By Kenneth Relyea, P~~D. Reprinted from The Catalyst, the puhlj­ cation of Tte American Catfish and Leach Introduction . A::-;rwC'ia t i ore, ~reshwater, marine coaslaJ areas and even some cora} reefs harbor fi.sh~?s known as catfishes. Greenwood, et. al. ( 1966) recognized l! families, including abou.i 2,000 species in the order Siluriformes (the catfishes). A1 t.ho11gh most ~:;pee i es occur in freshwater, a few are mar:i ne, i.nclud ing the species of the family Plotosidae in the Tndo-Pa.c i fie region, 8.nd species of the family Ari i dae of U:e At­ lantj.c coast of the United States. The two Ariid catfishes fo11nd along the u.s. Atlantic and Gulf coasts are Arius felis, the sea cat, and Ba~re marinus, the zafftop or sail cat. Both swim into freshwater rtvers. These species incubate their eggs orally: 'rhe rema1.n1ng catfish families are freshwater groups, with indivi­ dual species only incidentally inhabiting bayR or river mouths. Of these fami.l ies only the family Ictaluridae occurs in the U.S., and is not found naturally outside of the U.S. and Mexico. The famous Walking Catfish of Florida is an introduced species of the family ~lariidae and will not be considered in this article. Five genera of catfishes comprise the Tctaluridae of the U.S.: No­ turu~, Ictalurus, Pylodictis, Satan, and Trogloglanis. The last three contain but one known species each. Noturus (Schibeodes of ~orne authors, see Blair et.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspective, Pioneering Researchers and Fish Health Workers, and Annotated Bibliography Andrew J
    Aquaculture 196Ž. 2001 347–438 www.elsevier.nlrlocateraqua-online Review article Finfish health in the United Statesž/ 1609–1969: historical perspective, pioneering researchers and fish health workers, and annotated bibliography Andrew J. Mitchell Harry K. Dupree Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center, USDA, Agricultural Research SerÕice, P.O. Box 860, Stuttgart, AR 72160, USA Accepted 30 August 2000 Abstract The importance of fish health studies prior to the 1970s is largely ignored by US fish health investigators. This is because today’s literature searches rarely obtain research information prior to 1970. The absence of this earlier literature can result in the duplication of research efforts and missing data that could change the course of a scientific investigation. This is particularly true for studies in fish parasitology. Much of the descriptive literature done between 1900 and 1950 is still valid today and may be the only work available for reference. Older data is also important to understanding disease origin and disease etiology. Information on diseased fish from the geo- graphic region, now known as the United States of America, was first recorded in about 1609 when Captain John Smith described a fish kill. In the 19th century, more than 250 pieces of literature written by US investigators were retrieved that described diseases and parasites of fish. After 1899, only the studies of more prominent fish health specialists, as determined by publication records, have been highlighted. In general, this review documents the development of fish health studies in the US. It serves as a historical document, but more importantly as a resource of older works important to today’s scientific studies.
    [Show full text]