DOCSLIB.ORG

Cde6 National Grid Noa 17-18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cde6 National Grid Noa 17-18 Viking Link: UK Onshore Scheme Planning Appeal Core Document Reference 16.11 National Grid Network Options Assessment (NOA) 2017-18 Network Options Assessment 2017/18 UK electricity transmission JANUARY 2018 Network Options Assessment 2017/18 – January 2018 01 How to use this interactive document To help you find the information you need quickly and easily we have published NOA as an interactive document. Home A to Z This will take you to the contents page. You will find a link to the glossary You can click on the titles to navigate on each page. to a section. Hyperlinks Arrows Hyperlinks are highlighted in bold Click on the arrows to move throughout the report. You can click backwards or forwards a page. on them to access further information. Network Options Assessment 2017/18 – January 2018 02 For the past couple of years our Future Energy Scenarios (FES) publication has highlighted how we are in the midst of an energy revolution. Our Network Options Assessment (NOA) publication, along with our other System Operator (SO) publications, aims to help our industry ensure a secure, sustainable and affordable energy future. We publish the NOA as part of Investment decision our SO role. The NOA describes The SO considered the investment the major projects considered options proposed by the to meet the future needs in GB’s Transmission Owners. A couple electricity transmission system of the highlights are: as outlined in the Electricity Ten • Recommendation for investment Year Statement (ETYS) 2017, and of £21.6m in 2018/19 across recommends which investments 22 projects to potentially deliver in the year ahead would best projects worth almost £3.2bn. manage the capability of the GB • Analysis suggests a total transmission networks against interconnection capacity of the uncertainty of the future. 17.4 GW between GB and European markets by 2030 To be transparent in our processes would provide optimal benefit. and to ensure that the SO is impartial throughout, we follow The NOA represents a balance the NOA methodology, approved between asset investment and by Ofgem earlier in the year. This network management to achieve methodology sets out how we base the best use of bill payers’ money. our recommendations on the data and How the future energy landscape analysis of the 2017 FES and ETYS. could look is uncertain, and the SO’s recommendations are The news about SO separation there to help make sure the GB from the National Grid Transmission transmission network is fit for the Owner was announced earlier in the future. In producing this year’s NOA year. I do not foresee that this results we have listened to and acted on in significant change to the NOA your feedback. We welcome your itself although the changing roles and views on the changes we have responsibilities of different parties will made and in helping further shape be reflected in future methodologies. the publication to meet your needs. We are also planning how NOA can continue to evolve over the coming Julian Leslie years to maximise consumer benefit. Head of Network Capability, Electricity Network Options Assessment 2017/18 – January 2018 03 Contents Chapter one Chapter five Aim of the report .....................................................10 Investment recommendations .............................78 1.1 Introduction ................................................ 11 5.1 Introduction .................................................79 1.2 How the NOA fits in with the FES 5.2 Interpretation of the NOA outcomes .....81 and ETYS .....................................................12 5.3 NOA outcomes............................................83 1.3 What NOA can do .......................................13 5.4 Recommendation for each option .........95 1.4 What NOA cannot do .................................14 1.5 The NOA report methodology .................15 1.6 Navigating through the document .........16 1.7 What’s new? ................................................17 Chapter six 1.8 Stakeholder engagement and feedback ..............................................19 Interconnection analysis .....................................102 6.1 Introduction ...............................................103 6.2 Interconnection theory ...........................105 Chapter two 6.3 Current and potential interconnection ........................................106 6.4 Methodology .............................................107 Methodology ............................................................20 6.5 Outcome .................................................... 111 2.1 Introduction .................................................21 6.6 Summary ....................................................121 2.2 NOA process ...............................................22 2.3 Economic analysis .....................................25 2.4 The NOA Committee .................................32 2.5 How the NOA connects to Chapter seven the SWW process .......................................33 2.6 Interaction between the NOA results and the FES ....................................35 Stakeholder engagement ....................................122 2.7 Other options .............................................36 7.1 Introduction ...............................................123 7.2 Continuous development .......................124 7.3 Stakeholder engagement ......................125 Chapter three Chapter eight Boundary descriptions ..........................................38 3.1 Introduction .................................................39 3.2 Scotland and the Appendix A – Economic analysis results .........127 North of England region ...........................40 Appendix B – SWW Projects ...............................133 3.3 The South and East of England region ..52 8.1 Shetland Link ............................................133 3.4 Wales and West Midlands region ...........59 8.2 Orkney Link ...............................................135 8.3 Western Isles Link ....................................137 8.4 Eastern Network Reinforcement .........139 8.5 South East Network Reinforcement ....143 Chapter four Appendix C – List of four-letter codes ..............145 Appendix D – Meet the NOA team .....................148 Appendix E – Glossary .........................................149 Proposed options ...................................................62 Disclaimer ..............................................................153 4.1 Introduction .................................................63 4.2 Reinforcement options – Scotland and the North of England region ...........................64 4.3 Reinforcement options – the South and East of England region ......................72 4.4 Reinforcement options – Wales and West Midlands region ...........76 Network Options Assessment 2017/18 – January 2018 04 Executive summary Using the 2017 FES, ETYS 2017 and following the methodology approved by Ofgem, the System Operator (SO) recommends the options which the GB Transmission Owners (TOs) should invest in for the upcoming year. Below, we present a summary of the key points of the NOA 2017/18. Key points • The SO recommends investment • The NOA is about getting the right of £21.6m in 2018/19 across 22 decision, balancing potential constraint projects to maintain the option to costs against investment costs for an deliver projects worth almost £3.2bn. uncertain future. The NOA Committee This year’s investment will allow us to identified two reduced-build options manage the future capability of the that could create significant consumer GB transmission networks against the value. As the SO, we requested the uncertainty of the future. This will make TOs bring forward more reduced-build sure that the networks can continue options in the future. supporting the transition to the future energy landscape in an efficient, • We performed analysis of 76 different economical and coordinated way. reinforcement options in this NOA. Twenty-one options are given either • As the energy landscape is uncertain, a Stop or Do not start recommendation the SO must make sure that any as they are not optimal at this time. network investment is truly necessary. We also recommend 31 optimal options Our reviewed methodology was to be put on Hold where investment approved by Ofgem and included decisions could be made when there improvements to minimise the potential is greater certainty in the future. This for ‘false-positive’ recommendations. ensures that a recommendation for an The first improvement was the investment is made at the most efficient introduction of implied scenario time. Where the recommendation probabilities. Implied probabilities cannot be delayed any further, our calculate how probable we need to economic analysis assesses the cost believe a scenario is in order to make impact of not investing in this financial the same decision under a conventional year. Based on this analysis the SO decision-making process. The second recommends deferring the spend was the inception of a NOA Committee. of £8.6m on four options in 2018/19. This Committee, comprised of SO Table 0.1 is an overview of the representatives, provides scrutiny of the investment recommendations where results in a transparent and rigorous way. the decision must be made this year. Network Options Assessment 2017/18 – January 2018 05 Executive summary • This year the recommended investment the delay in the earliest in service dates spend is lower, primarily due to two of the Eastern Links combined with factors. Since the publication
Load more

Recommended publications
  • January 2020 NOA 2019/20 NOA 02 2019/20 Foreword
    Network Options Assessment January 2020 NOA 2019/20 NOA 02 2019/20 Foreword Last year saw a major milestone in the We are pleased to present the 5th NOA report, In producing this year’s NOA we have listened UK’s energy revolution as the Government with the aim of generating consumer value by to and acted on your feedback. We are making passed laws to end its contribution to avoiding over or under investment in the more changes and enhancements to the global warming by 2050. As the Electricity transmission network. process. I would welcome your thoughts as to System Operator (ESO), we also set how we can push the NOA even further to drive To make sure our processes are transparent, we value for consumers whilst continuing to operate a target, of having the capability to follow the NOA methodology, in full consultation a safe and secure GB transmission system. operate a zero carbon network by 2025. with our stakeholders and which is approved by Our Network Options Assessment (NOA) Ofgem on an annual basis. This methodology publication, along with our other ESO sets out how we base our recommendations publications, continues to embrace these on the data and analysis of the 2019 FES and ambitions and lead our industry towards ETYS. Our latest methodology was approved a secure, sustainable and affordable by Ofgem in October 2019. energy future. The NOA represents a balance between asset The NOA is a key part of the ESO role. investment and network management to It describes the major projects we are achieve the best use of consumers’ money.
    [Show full text]
  • Surfing and the Future of Scotlands Seas
    Scottish Marine Recreational Resources: Surfing and the Future of Scotland’s Seas PREPARED 23 Jan 2013 Prepared by W. Watson The Scottish Surfing Federation January 2013 Contents Forward..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 1) Understanding Changes in the Marine Environment.....................................................................................................................................4 1.1) What is RenewaBle Energy? ........................................................................................................................................................................4 1.2) So what is the scale of Scotland’s Renewable Industry? .................................................................................................................6 1.3) The Units of Power and Energy in layman’s terms............................................................................................................................6 1.4) Benchmarking Power CaPacities of existing Scottish Power SuPPlies .....................................................................................7 1.5) The History of Scotlands Renewables – The Hydro Schemes 1900 - 2000.............................................................................7 1.6) Onshore Wind 2000 - 2012..........................................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • A Scoping Study On: Research Into Changes in Sediment Dynamics Linked to Marine Renewable Energy Installations
    A Scoping Study on: Research into Changes in Sediment Dynamics Linked to Marine Renewable Energy Installations Laurent Amoudry3, Paul S. Bell3, Kevin S. Black2, Robert W. Gatliff1 Rachel Helsby2, Alejandro J. Souza3, Peter D. Thorne3, Judith Wolf3 April 2009 1British Geological Survey Murchison House West Mains Road Edinburgh EH9 3LA [email protected] www.bgs.ac.uk 2Partrac Ltd 141 St James Rd Glasgow G4 0LT [email protected] www.partrac.com 3Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Joseph Proudman Building 6 Brownlow Street Liverpool L3 5DA, www.pol.ac.uk 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study scopes research into the impacts and benefits of large-scale coastal and offshore marine renewable energy projects in order to allow NERC to develop detailed plans for research activities in the 2009 Theme Action Plans. Specifically this study focuses on understanding changes in sediment dynamics due to renewable energy structures. Three overarching science ideas have emerged where NERC could provide a significant contribution to the knowledge base. Research into these key areas has the potential to help the UK with planning, regulation and monitoring of marine renewable installations in a sustainable way for both stakeholders and the environment. A wide ranging consultation with stakeholders was carried out encompassing regulators, developers, researchers and other marine users with a relevance to marine renewable energy and/or sediment dynamics. Based on this consultation a review of the present state of knowledge has been produced, and a relevant selection of recent and current research projects underway within the UK identified to which future NERC funded research could add value. A great deal of research has already been done by other organisations in relation to the wind sector although significant gaps remain, particularly in long term and far-field effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Response From
    Agenda Item No. 5 Pieter Montyn E.ON Climate & Renewables UK Cabinet Member for Highways and Transport Rampion Offshore Wind Limited Cabinet Office Westwood Way Ground Floor Westwood Business Park County Hall Coventry West Midlands Chichester CV4 8LG West Sussex www.eon-uk.com PO19 1RZ Chris Tomlinson 01273 603 721 3 December 2013 07815 141 008 Dear Mr Montyn, Rampion Offshore Wind Farm Thank you for your letter dated 14 November 2013 seeking clarity on issues regarding the Rampion offshore wind farm. I respond to each issue in turn. 1. Benefits and facilities for local people The overarching benefits of the Rampion Offshore Wind Farm are to create safe, secure, clean energy to help secure our energy supplies and keep the lights on, while tackling climate change through reducing carbon emissions and creating jobs during construction and operation. In addition to these core benefits, our policy is to ensure that we are a good neighbour to the local community, to continue our track record on existing offshore wind farms of working with communities and supporting local projects and education initiatives. To achieve this, we will develop relationships with Sussex communities and consider the potential to provide initiatives through community benefits funds. Our plan to deliver community benefits is intended to support initiatives in those communities associated with the offshore and onshore elements of the Project. The exact geographical scope and distribution of such initiatives need to be very carefully considered in view of the spatial extent of the Project. We intend to consult the wider community through a number of existing communication channels that we established for the Agenda Item No.
    [Show full text]
  • Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..……
    Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..…… Southern North Sea candidate Special Area of Conservation (SNS cSAC): Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment Date: May 2018 Document No: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Rev: 03 CONFIDENTIAL SNS cSAC Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment Document Number: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Rev 01 Company: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Asset: Whole Asset Farm Project: Whole Wind Farm Sub Project/Package: Document Title or Southern North Sea candidate Special Area of Conservation: Report to Inform Description: Appropriate Assessment 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Document Number: Contractor Ref No: The document Originator shall complete this Cover Sheet and may give guidance below on any actions required by the recipient(s). The document Checker and Approver must not be the same person. The Document Author and Approver must not be the same person. The Approver must not be less senior than the Author. This document and any information therein are confidential property of Triton Knoll and without infringement neither the whole nor any extract may be disclosed, loaned, copied or used for manufacturing, provision of services or other purposes whatsoever without prior written consent of the Triton Knoll, and no liability is accepted for loss or damage from any cause whatsoever from the use of the document. Triton Knoll retains the right to alter the document at any time unless a written statement to the contrary has been appended 03 24/04/2018 Issued for information to NE - Sally Kazer Tim Golding Penny Pickett Updated following BEIS comments (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) 02 18/05/18 Issued for information to NE - Sally Kazer Tim Golding Melissa Read Updated following NE comments (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) 01 19/02/2018 Issued for information to BEIS & NE Sophie Cousens Tim Golding Penny Pickett (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) Rev No.
    [Show full text]
  • National Planning Framework for Scotland 2 Wealthier and Fairer
    NATIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK FOR SCOTLAND 2 WEALTHIER AND FAIRER GREENER SMARTER SAFER AND STRONGER HEALTHIER CONTENTS Paragraph INTRODUCTION 1 KEY CHALLENGES 11 ECONOMIC STRATEGY 12 The Importance of Place 13 NATIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK FOR SCOTLAND 2 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 15 Climate Change 16 Transport 21 Energy 25 Waste 27 Biodiversity 28 New Technologies 29 PEOPLE AND HOUSEHOLDS 31 SCOTLAND IN THE WORLD 36 Europe 37 United Kingdom 42 SCOTLAND – 2030 44 A GROWING ECONOMY 45 A GREENER SCOTLAND 48 STRONGER, SMARTER, HEALTHIER AND SAFER COMMUNITIES 50 DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 53 The Cities and their Regions 54 Sustainable Growth 58 Housing 72 Sustainable Communities 78 Built Environment 79 Regeneration 85 Vacant and Derelict Land 89 Greening the Environment 92 Landscape and Cultural Heritage 97 Marine and Coastal Environment 101 Paragraph INFRASTRUCTURE 103 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 104 TRANSPORT 106 External Links 114 Internal Connectivity 128 Sustainable Transport and Land Use 136 NATIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK FOR SCOTLAND 2 ENERGY Renewable Energy 144 Baseload Power Stations 151 Fossil Fuels 154 Electricity Transmission 157 Sub-Sea Grid 162 Heat 163 Decentralised Production 164 WASTE MANAGEMENT Municipal, Commercial and Industrial Waste 166 Radioactive Waste 171 WATER AND DRAINAGE 174 WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND FLOODING 177 COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 180 SPATIAL PERSPECTIVES 183 CENTRAL BELT City Collaboration 186 Edinburgh Waterfront 187 West Edinburgh 188 East Central Scotland 189 Clyde Corridor 191 Clyde Waterfront 194 Clyde Gateway 198 Making the Connections 199 Green Network 202 EAST COAST 203 HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS 211 AYRSHIRE AND THE SOUTH-WEST 224 SOUTH OF SCOTLAND 232 Paragraph MAKING IT HAPPEN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 239 DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT 240 ACTION PROGRAMME 243 ENQUIRIES 245 Page ANNEX: NATIONAL NATIONAL PLANNING FRAMEWORK FOR SCOTLAND 2 DEVELOPMENTS – STATEMENTS OF NEED 102 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Benefits in the Great Glen Sse Renewables’ Socio-Economic Contribution Generating Benefits in the Great Glen
    GENERATING BENEFITS IN THE GREAT GLEN SSE RENEWABLES’ SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION GENERATING BENEFITS IN THE GREAT GLEN ABOUT SSE RENEWABLES FOREWORD SSE Renewables is a leading developer and operator of renewable Over the years, the purpose of SSE Renewables has gone unchanged – to provide energy, with a portfolio of around 4GW of onshore wind, offshore people with the energy they need – but the world around us is moving quickly. With wind and hydro. Part of the FTSE-listed SSE plc, its strategy is to only 30 years to reach Net Zero carbon targets set by governments in the UK and drive the transition to a zero-carbon future through the world around the world, we believe concerted action against climate change is necessary. class development, construction and operation of renewable energy assets. In response, we have redoubled our efforts to create a low carbon world today and work towards a better world of energy tomorrow. We’ve set a goal to treble our SSE Renewables owns nearly 2GW of onshore wind capacity renewable output to 30TWh a year by 2030, which will lower the carbon footprint of with over 1GW under development. Its 1,459MW hydro portfolio electricity production across the UK and Ireland. Potential future projects in the Great includes 300MW of pumped storage and 750MW of flexible hydro. Glen can make significant contributions towards this goal. Its offshore wind portfolio consists of 580MW across three offshore sites, two of which it operates on behalf of its joint venture partners. For SSE Renewables, building more renewable energy projects in the Great Glen is SSE Renewables has the largest offshore wind development about more than just the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks
    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • SSE Annual Report 2006
    POWERFUL OPPORTUNITIES Scottish and Southern Energy plc Annual Report 2006 Scottish and Southern Energy Annual Report 2006 Contents Chairman’s Statement 1 Directors’ Report 28 Dividends 59 What We Do 2 Corporate Governance 29 Earnings Per Share 60 Where We Are 4 Organisation and Structure 29 Intangible Assets 61 Key Performance Indicators 6 Board Effectiveness 30 Property, Plant and Equipment 63 Chief Executive’s Statement 8 Board Commitees 30 Investment in Associates and Joint Ventures 64 Audit Committee 30 Subsidiary Undertakings 66 Directors’ Statement 9 Remuneration Committee 31 Acquisitions and Disposals 68 Financial Overview 9 Nomination Committee 31 Inventories 70 Energy Systems 9 Risk Committee 32 Trade and Other Receivables 70 Generation and Supply 13 Executive Committee 32 Cash and Cash Equivalents 70 Contracting, Connections and Metering 20 Health, Safety and Environmental Advisory Committee 32 Trade and Other Payables 71 Gas Storage 21 Internal Control and Risk Management Current Tax Liabilities 71 Telecoms 22 Committee 32 Construction Contracts 71 Exceptional Items 22 Going Concern 33 Loans and Other Borrowings 71 Capital Expenditure 22 Communication with Shareholders Deferred Taxation 74 Financial Management 23 and Major Business Stakeholders 33 Provisions 75 Tax 23 Share Capital 76 Balance Sheet 25 Directors’ Biographies and Responsibilities 34 Reserves 76 Purchase of own Shares 25 Remuneration Report 36 Minority Interests 77 Corporate Responsibility 25 Retirement Benefit Obligations 78 Strategy and Outlook 25 Independent
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Windfarm Load Factors 2006 by Site
    UK Windfarm Load Factors 2006 By Site The most recent date of ROC issue on the Renewable Obligation Certificate Register available from the Ofgem web site included in the analysis was 25th April 2007. The two monthly figures shown are the actual number of ROC's issued and this figure expressed as a percentage of the the ROC's which could be issued if the output was continually at the at the maximum DNC value, without interruption, for the complete month. The cumulative annual figures are included, where the figures given against each location are the actual number of ROC's issued during the year, the possible number of ROC's which could be issued if the output was continually at the maximum DNC value and actual output expressed as a percentage of this figure. This is the annual load (capacity) factor of each location. Most recent ROC issue date 25 April 2007 For year 2006 Annual output by technology Actual Possible % Median of Individual MWh MWh Monthly % Values Biomass 985214 1759199 56.00 55.19 Co-firing of biomass with fossil fuel 2456733 230290215 1.07 0.91 Biomass and waste using ACT 11496 26114 44.02 48.59 Micro hydro 55815 121504 45.94 46.23 Hydro <20 MW DNC 2049389 4977685 41.17 37.68 Landfill gas 4168045 6718018 62.04 63.76 Waste using an ACT 1224 11529 10.62 11.44 Off-shore wind 685819 2503109 27.40 27.18 On-shore wind 3530914 13767395 25.65 26.58 Wind 4216733 16270504 25.92 Sewage gas 333578 655003 50.93 51.91 Wave power 9 1452 0.62 0.56 PV 131 1770 7.40 7.45 Contribution to annual total renewable energy generation Biomass
    [Show full text]
  • Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..……
    Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..…… Non Material Change Application: Consolidated Screening Review of Potential Impacts on Natura 2000 Sites Date: June 2018 Document No: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0032 Rev: 02 CONFIDENTIAL Non Material Change Application: Consolidated Screening Document Number 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0032 Review of Potential Impacts on Natura 2000 Sites Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Project Rev 02 Company: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Asset: Array Farm Limited Project: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Sub Project/Package: Farm Document Title or Non Material Change Application: Consolidated Screening Review of Potential Description: Impacts on Natura 2000 Sites Document Number: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0032 Contractor Ref No: The document Originator shall complete this Cover Sheet and may give guidance below on any actions required by the recipient(s). The document Checker and Approver must not be the same person. The Document Author and Approver must not be the same person. The Approver must not be less senior than the Author. This document and any information therein are confidential property of Triton Knoll and without infringement neither the whole nor any extract may be disclosed, loaned, copied or used for manufacturing, provision of services or other purposes whatsoever without prior written consent of the Triton Knoll, and no liability is accepted for loss or damage from any cause whatsoever from the use of the document. Triton Knoll retains the right to alter the document at any time unless a written statement to the contrary has been appended 02 13 June 2018 Updated and Issued to BEIS N. Clargo T.
    [Show full text]