DOCSLIB.ORG

Cdc13 Phase 2 Consultation Feedback Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cdc13 Phase 2 Consultation Feedback Report Viking Link: UK Onshore Scheme Planning Appeal Core Document Reference 4.7 Phase 2 Consultation Feedback Report UK Onshore Scheme Phase 2 Consultation Feedback Report Volume 1 VKL-08-39-G500-006 Chapter 01 December 2016 Introduction © National Grid Viking Link Limited 2016. The reproduction or transmission of all or part of this report without the written permission of the owner, is prohibited and the commission of any unauthorised act in relation to the report may result in civil or criminal actions. National Grid Viking Link Limited will not be liable for any use which is made of opinions or views expressed within it. Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................5 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Purpose of the report .......................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Structure of the report......................................................................................................... 7 2 APPROACH TO CONSULTATION .................................................................................8 2.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Phase 1 Consultation ....................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Public Participation Events ................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Local authority and stakeholder workshops and briefings ....................................................... 12 3 PHASE 2 CONSULTATION DELIVERY .......................................................................15 3.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 15 3.2 Local authorities, statutory stakeholders and other stakeholder groups..................................... 19 3.3 MPs and MEPs................................................................................................................ 19 3.4 Parish councils ................................................................................................................ 20 3.5 Landowners .................................................................................................................... 20 3.6 Local communities ........................................................................................................... 21 3.7 Public consultation events ................................................................................................. 21 3.8 Project website ................................................................................................................ 23 4 PHASE 2 CONSULTATION FEEDBACK .....................................................................24 4.1 Consultation feedback channels ......................................................................................... 24 4.2 Managing feedback .......................................................................................................... 24 4.3 Responses received ......................................................................................................... 24 4.4 Feedback received general themes .................................................................................... 25 List of Tables Table 2.1 Details of Public Participation Events 11 Table 2.2 Stakeholder workshops and meetings 12 Table 2.3 Local authority meetings 13 Table 2.4 Elected member briefings 14 Table 3.1 Details of public consultation events 22 Table 4.1 Feedback received by type 24 Table 4.2 Feedback received by respondent 25 December 2016 VKL-08-39-G500-006 List of Figures Figure 1.1 Overview of Viking Link 5 Figure 3.1 Orange Route Corridor 15 Figure 3.2 Purple Route Corridor 16 Figure 3.3 Converter station ‘contextual’ design 17 Figure 3.4 Converter station ‘functional’ blue design 17 Figure 3.5 Converter station ‘functional’ green design 18 December 2016 VKL-08-39-G500-006 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Viking Link is a proposed 1400 megawatt (MW) high voltage direct current (DC) electricity link (or interconnector) between the British and Danish transmission systems which will allow electricity to be exchanged between the two countries equivalent to around 1.3% of Great Britain's current usage. It is being jointly developed by National Grid Viking Link Limited (NGVL) and its development partner Energinet.dk (ENDK). 1.1.2 An overview of Viking Link is illustrated in Figure 1.1. The Project comprises approximately 760km of DC onshore and offshore electricity transmission cables between new converter stations at each end of the link. These are in turn connected to the high voltage electricity transmission networks at existing substations in Bicker Fen, Lincolnshire in Great Britain and at Revsing, south Jutland in Denmark. Figure 1.1 Overview of Viking Link 1.1.3 More specifically the Project comprises the following: In Denmark, referred to as the ‘DK Onshore Scheme’: - New equipment within an existing 400 kV substation and a high voltage alternating current (AC) connection between the existing electricity transmission system and a new converter station; - New converter station to change electricity between AC and DC or vice versa depending on direction of operation; December 2016 5 VKL-08-39-G500-006 - Onshore underground DC cables from a converter station to the coast in western Denmark. In the North Sea (Danish, German, Dutch and United Kingdom Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ)), referred to as the ’Offshore Scheme’: - Approximately 650 km of submarine DC cables buried in the seabed for as much of their length as practicable. In the United Kingdom, referred to as the ‘UK Onshore Scheme’: - Onshore underground DC cables from the Lincolnshire coast to a new converter station; - New converter station to change electricity between DC and AC or vice versa depending on direction of operation; - AC cables from the converter station to new equipment within an existing substation which connects to the existing electricity transmission system. 1.1.4 The interconnector will enable more effective use of renewable energy, access to sustainable electricity generation and improved security of electricity supplies. Thus it will have socioeconomic benefits for both Denmark and Great Britain and the wider European community. 1.1.5 Viking Link has been designated a Project of Common Interest (PCI) under the TEN-E Regulations. These set out guidelines to assist in the development of energy networks within Europe, in particular streamlining the permitting process for major energy infrastructure projects that contribute to European energy networks. Under the TEN-E Regulations, developers are required to consult with all stakeholders and provide an opportunity for them to attend meetings, comment on proposals and discuss any concerns they may have on the Project. 1.2 Purpose of the report 1.2.1 NGVL is currently undertaking a comprehensive pre-application engagement programme on the Viking Link project. 1.2.2 This report presents a detailed account of the stakeholder engagement and public consultation which has been undertaken following the Phase 1 Consultation. It includes details of the Public Participation Events which were held in July and August 2016 and the Phase 2 Consultation held from Monday, 5 September 2016 to Friday, 14 October 2016. 1.2.3 The Public Participation Events were held to introduce the Project to local residents, landowners and stakeholders across the Cable Route Corridor Search Area and give people the opportunity to comment on proposals at an early stage. 1.2.4 The Phase 2 Consultation sought views on the underground DC cable route corridor options between the preferred landfall site at Boygrift, East Lindsey and the preferred converter station site at North Ing Drove, South Holland. 1.2.5 The Phase 2 Consultation also sought views on the design style options for the converter station building. December 2016 6 VKL-08-39-G500-006 1.2.6 This report also sets out the feedback received, along with NGVL’s responses to the key issues and themes raised. 1.3 Structure of the report 1.3.1 This Consultation Feedback Report is split into three volumes. 1.3.2 Volume 1 is structured as follows: Chapter 1 – provides a general introduction about the Project Chapter 2 – outlines the approach to the Phase 2 Consultation and engagement undertaken Chapter 3 – details the delivery of the Phase 2 Consultation Chapter 4 – provides a summary of the Phase 2 Consultation feedback received. 1.3.3 Volume 2 is structured as follows: Chapter 5 – provides NGVL’s responses to feedback on cable route corridors Chapter 6 – provides NGVL’s responses to feedback on converter station design styles Chapter 7 – provides NGVL’s responses to the Phase 2 Consultation feedback - stakeholders. 1.3.4 Volume 3 of this report contains chapter 8, the appendices. December 2016 7 VKL-08-39-G500-006 2 Approach to consultation 2.1 Overview 2.1.1 NGVL has committed to engage with stakeholders throughout the development of the Project. The objectives of the engagement activities are: to engage and consult publicly on the Project; to seek feedback to help inform NGVL’s decisions; and to ensure NGVL delivers a compliant and robust consultation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minutes for Treasure Valuation Committee Meeting – 23Rd May 2012
    Minutes for Treasure Valuation Committee Meeting – 23rd May 2012 The meeting was held in the Hartwell Room at the British Museum on Wednesday, 23rd May 2012 at 11am. Present Committee British Museum DCMS Colin Renfrew (Chair) Caroline Barton Paul Blaker Trevor Austin Roger Bland Ian Carradice Janina Parol John Cherry Ian Richardson Peter Clayton Emma Traherne David Dykes Hetty Gleave Tim Pestell Item 1: Minutes of the meeting of Friday, 20th April 2012 Item 2: Objects Bronze Age artefacts 1. Bronze Age gold ring (broken) from Dalton area, Cumbria (2011 T499) The provisional valuer suggested £180-£200. The Committee examined the broken ring in light of this and noted that the suggested figure had an appropriate uplift on the bullion value of the equivalent amount of gold to reflect the item’s appeal. In agreement with the provisional valuer, the Committee recommended £180. Dock Museum hopes to acquire. NB – The Committee confirmed as a principle that the method of arriving at a recommended figure by means of the bullion value of the precious metal in an artefact (detailed in the minutes of the meeting of 20 April 2012) should only be applied when the item is non-descript and not of any particular recognisable form or function. In cases where the item’s form is clearly discerned, such as in the above example, where, although damaged, the item is clearly a ring, the Committee agreed that it would refer to the bullion value only to ensure that the recommended figure was at least equal to this amount. 2. Bronze Age gold ring from Headbourne Worthy, Hampshire (2010 T145) The provisional valuer suggested £400.
    [Show full text]
  • Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..……
    Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..…… Southern North Sea candidate Special Area of Conservation (SNS cSAC): Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment Date: May 2018 Document No: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Rev: 03 CONFIDENTIAL SNS cSAC Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment Document Number: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Rev 01 Company: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Asset: Whole Asset Farm Project: Whole Wind Farm Sub Project/Package: Document Title or Southern North Sea candidate Special Area of Conservation: Report to Inform Description: Appropriate Assessment 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0016 Document Number: Contractor Ref No: The document Originator shall complete this Cover Sheet and may give guidance below on any actions required by the recipient(s). The document Checker and Approver must not be the same person. The Document Author and Approver must not be the same person. The Approver must not be less senior than the Author. This document and any information therein are confidential property of Triton Knoll and without infringement neither the whole nor any extract may be disclosed, loaned, copied or used for manufacturing, provision of services or other purposes whatsoever without prior written consent of the Triton Knoll, and no liability is accepted for loss or damage from any cause whatsoever from the use of the document. Triton Knoll retains the right to alter the document at any time unless a written statement to the contrary has been appended 03 24/04/2018 Issued for information to NE - Sally Kazer Tim Golding Penny Pickett Updated following BEIS comments (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) 02 18/05/18 Issued for information to NE - Sally Kazer Tim Golding Melissa Read Updated following NE comments (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) 01 19/02/2018 Issued for information to BEIS & NE Sophie Cousens Tim Golding Penny Pickett (GoBe) (GoBe) (TK) Rev No.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2014, East Midlands
    2014 HERITAGE AT RISK 2014 / EAST MIDLANDS Contents Heritage at Risk III Nottinghamshire 58 Ashfield 58 The Register VII Bassetlaw 59 Broxtowe 63 Content and criteria VII Gedling 64 Criteria for inclusion on the Register VIII Mansfield 65 Reducing the risks X Newark and Sherwood 65 Rushcliffe 68 Key statistics XIII Rutland (UA) 69 Publications and guidance XIV Key to the entries XVI Entries on the Register by local planning XVIII authority Derby, City of (UA) 1 Derbyshire 2 Amber Valley 2 Bolsover 3 Chesterfield 4 Derbyshire Dales 5 High Peak 6 North East Derbyshire 8 Peak District (NP) 9 South Derbyshire 9 Leicester, City of (UA) 12 Leicestershire 15 Blaby 15 Charnwood 15 Harborough 17 Hinckley and Bosworth 19 Melton 20 North West Leicestershire 21 Lincolnshire 22 Boston 22 East Lindsey 24 Lincoln 32 North Kesteven 33 South Holland 36 South Kesteven 39 West Lindsey 44 Northamptonshire 49 Daventry 49 East Northamptonshire 52 Kettering 53 Northampton 54 South Northamptonshire 54 Wellingborough 56 Nottingham, City of (UA) 57 II EAST MIDLANDS Heritage at Risk is our campaign to save listed buildings and important historic sites, places and landmarks from neglect or decay. At its heart is the Heritage at Risk Register, an online database containing details of each site known to be at risk. It is analysed and updated annually and this leaflet summarises the results. Over the past year we have focused much of our effort on assessing listed Places of Worship; visiting those considered to be in poor or very bad condition as a result of local reports.
    [Show full text]
  • JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team
    Coasts and seas of the United Kingdom Region 11 The Western Approaches: Falmouth Bay to Kenfig edited by J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson, S.S. Kaznowska, J.P. Doody, N.C. Davidson & A.L. Buck Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road Peterborough PE1 1JY UK ©JNCC 1996 This volume has been produced by the Coastal Directories Project of the JNCC on behalf of the project Steering Group and supported by WWF-UK. JNCC Coastal Directories Project Team Project directors Dr J.P. Doody, Dr N.C. Davidson Project management and co-ordination J.H. Barne, C.F. Robson Editing and publication S.S. Kaznowska, J.C. Brooksbank, A.L. Buck Administration & editorial assistance C.A. Smith, R. Keddie, J. Plaza, S. Palasiuk, N.M. Stevenson The project receives guidance from a Steering Group which has more than 200 members. More detailed information and advice came from the members of the Core Steering Group, which is composed as follows: Dr J.M. Baxter Scottish Natural Heritage R.J. Bleakley Department of the Environment, Northern Ireland R. Bradley The Association of Sea Fisheries Committees of England and Wales Dr J.P. Doody Joint Nature Conservation Committee B. Empson Environment Agency Dr K. Hiscock Joint Nature Conservation Committee C. Gilbert Kent County Council & National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group Prof. S.J. Lockwood MAFF Directorate of Fisheries Research C.R. Macduff-Duncan Esso UK (on behalf of the UK Offshore Operators Association) Dr D.J. Murison Scottish Office Agriculture, Environment & Fisheries Department Dr H.J. Prosser Welsh Office Dr J.S.
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..……
    Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm ………………………………………………………..…… Non Material Change Application: Consolidated Screening Review of Potential Impacts on Natura 2000 Sites Date: June 2018 Document No: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0032 Rev: 02 CONFIDENTIAL Non Material Change Application: Consolidated Screening Document Number 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0032 Review of Potential Impacts on Natura 2000 Sites Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Project Rev 02 Company: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Asset: Array Farm Limited Project: Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Sub Project/Package: Farm Document Title or Non Material Change Application: Consolidated Screening Review of Potential Description: Impacts on Natura 2000 Sites Document Number: 2505-TKN-CON-K-RA-0032 Contractor Ref No: The document Originator shall complete this Cover Sheet and may give guidance below on any actions required by the recipient(s). The document Checker and Approver must not be the same person. The Document Author and Approver must not be the same person. The Approver must not be less senior than the Author. This document and any information therein are confidential property of Triton Knoll and without infringement neither the whole nor any extract may be disclosed, loaned, copied or used for manufacturing, provision of services or other purposes whatsoever without prior written consent of the Triton Knoll, and no liability is accepted for loss or damage from any cause whatsoever from the use of the document. Triton Knoll retains the right to alter the document at any time unless a written statement to the contrary has been appended 02 13 June 2018 Updated and Issued to BEIS N. Clargo T.
    [Show full text]
  • Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System …………………………………………………
    Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System ………………………………………………… Appendix 37: Outline Communications Plan (Revision B) Date: February 2016 Appendix 37 of the Applicant’s Response to Deadline 7 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited 4th Floor One Kingdom Street Triton Knoll Electrical System Paddington Central London W2 6BD Appendix 37: Outline Communications Plan T: 0845 026 0562 (Revision B) Email: [email protected] www.rweinnogy.com/tritonknoll Appendix 37 of the Applicant’s Response to Deadline 7 Date: February 2016 Drafted By: TKOWFL Approved By: Kim Gauld-Clark Date of Approval: February 2016 Revision: B Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Copyright © 2015 RWE Innogy UK Ltd All pre-existing rights reserved 2 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 4 Overview 4 The Applicant 4 Project Overview 4 Purpose of this Outline Communications Plan 5 Scope of this Outline Communications Plan 6 2 COMMUNICATIONS PLAN 7 Objectives 7 Management measures 7 Local diversions 8 Local employment opportunities 8 Communication of cable route construction sequence 8 3 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System 1 INTRODUCTION Overview 1.1 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited (TKOWFL) is submitting an application to the Planning Inspectorate (PINS), on behalf of the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, for a Development Consent Order (DCO) for the Triton Knoll Electrical System (the proposed development) under the Planning Act 2008. The Triton Knoll Electrical System (TKES) would connect the consented Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm (TKOWF) to the National Grid substation at Bicker Fen, Boston, and would comprise offshore and onshore export cable circuits, landfall infrastructure, an onshore electrical compound, an onshore substation and works at the Bicker Fen substation.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 1 Boygrift to Well High Lane
    Filename: K:\projects\UA008366-Viking Link\E-OurDrawings\Planning\Viking MXDs\FAO Jess Murray\Cable\DBA\UA008366-Cable DBA-Fig 2-Heritage-Assets.mxd CONSULTANT: ARCADIS PRODUCED: A.HANKINS CHECKED: J.MURRAY APPROVED: J.GIDMAN © ON C 0 r o w n c o p y r i g h t a n d d a t a b a s e r i g h t s 2 0 1 6 . O r 5 d 0 n 0 a n c e S u r v e y 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 6 7 3 1 , 0 0 S 0 e M c e t t i r o e s n 1 E n d 1 7 4 4 0 8 2 6 9 4 1 2 4 0 7 2 5 5 L B 3 2 4 1 9 This drawing has been prepared for the use of AECOM's client. It may not be used, modified, reproduced or relied upon by third parties, except as agreed by AECOM or as required by law. AECOM accepts no responsibility, and denies any liability whatsoever, to any party that uses or relies on this drawing without AECOM's express written consent. Do not scale this document. All measurements must be obtained from the stated dimensions. 4 S N R L H F F F N L D 1 D R E H I I O E 4 i 2 1 G G I E a s E o o e G / G E V V t T 0 U U t e f s n E .
    [Show full text]
  • East Division. Binbrook, Saint Mary, Binbrook, Saint Gabriel. Croxby
    2754 East Division. In the Hundred of Ludborough. I Skidbrooke cum Saltfleetj Brackenborough, ] Somercotes, North, Binbrook, Saint Mary, 1 Somercotes, South, Binbrook, Saint Gabriel. Covenham, Saint Bartholomew, ; ; Covenham, Saint Mary, Stewton, Croxby, 1 1 TathweU, Linwood, Fotherby, ', Grimsby Parva, Welton on the Wolds, Orford, jWithcall, Rasen, Middle, Ludborough, , Ormsby, North, Utterby, Wykeham, Rasen, Market, I Yarborough. Stainton le Vale, Wyham cum Cadeby. Tealby, In the Hundred of Calceworth. In t?ie Hundred of Wraggoe. Thoresway, I Aby with Greenfield, Thorganby, Benniworth, Biscathorpe, f Anderby, Walesby, Brough upon Bain cum Girsby, JAlford, Willingham, North. Hainton, Belleau, Ludford Magna, Ludford Parva, Beesby in the Marsh, In the Hundred of Wraggoe. "Willingham, South. Bilsby with Asserby, an$ Kirmond le Mire, Thurlby, Legsby with Bleasby and CoIIow, In the Hundred of Gartree. Claythorpe, Calceby, SixhiUs, ' ' •: .Asterby, Cawthorpe, Little, Torrington, East. Baumber, Belchford, Cumberworth, Cawkwell, Claxby, near Alford, Donington upon Bain, Farlsthorpe, In the Hundred of Bradley Gayton le Marsh, Haverstoe, West Division. Edlington, Goulceby, Haugh, Aylesby, Heningby, Horsington, Hannah cum Hagnaby, Barnoldby le Beck, Langton by Horncastle, Hogsthorpe, Huttoft, Beelsby, Martin, Legburn, Bradley, Ranby, Mablethorpe, Cabourn, Scamblesby, Mumby cum Chapel Elsey and Coats, Great, Stainton, Market, Langham-row, Coates, Little, Stennigot, Sturton, Maltby le Marsh, Cuxwold, Thornton. Markby, Grimsby, Great, Reston, South, Hatcliffe with Gonerby, In the Hundred of Louth Eske. Rigsby with Ailby, Healing, Alvingham, Sutton le Marsh, Irby, Authorpe, Swaby with White Pit, Laceby, Burwell, Saleby with Thoresthorpe, Rothwell, Carlton, Great, Carlton Castle, Strubby with Woodthorpe; Scartho, Theddlethorpe All Saints, Carlton, Little, Theddlethorpe Saint Helen, Swallow. Conisholme, Thoresby, South, East Division. Calcethorpe, Cockerington, North, or Saint Tothill, Trusthorpe, Ashby cum Fenby, Mary, .
    [Show full text]
  • Dso Ai Market Tests Public Power Data
    New PowerJUNE 2019 REPORT CONTRACTS FOR DIFFERENCE Offshore wind steps up as thermal projects falter AI PUBLIC What can it do for energy? POWER Labour’s plans go local MARKET DSO Joining the EU’s TESTS new entity New products to manage constraint DATA ‘It is astonishing storage Industry should is not on the government’s learn lessons dashboard in the same way as offshore wind’ Mark Wilson, ILI Energy 15 MINUTES ‘Over 200GW of renewable Will GB lose capacity is likely to be required, its TERRE made up of predominantly wind and solar’ derogation? Kyle Martin, LCP Expert information for all those invested in the UK’s energy future REPORT Labour public ownership plan could create hundreds of local energy groups The Labour Party has put forward a programme for a bigger public role in energy supply that includes both national and regional authorities to set policy and could result in hundreds of local energy agencies. It promises, in ‘Bringing Energy Home’, that the change is not a return to “the distant bureaucracies of the 1970s”. The policy will start with a National Energy Agency, set up on the institutional base of National Grid, which will have duties over both decarbonisation and social objectives. It will own and operate the transmission system and will take over some of Ofgem’s functions. It will also be able to borrow to fund system extensions, including owning and operating storage. Regional energy agencies, based on distribution network operators’ areas, will have similar responsibilities within their areas and will also be able to take action over energy efficiency, regional industrial strategy and new infrastructure such as vehicle charging networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Far
    Last Updated: 10/12/2013 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Developer: RWE Site Size: Covering an area of 134 m² Site Location Triton Knoll is within the Greater Wash StrategiC Area and is loCated off the east Coast of England, approximately 20 miles off the Coast of LinColnshire and 28 miles from the Coast of North NorfolK. Swell is predominantly North Easterly. Several beaChes Could be affeCted by the Array like Withernsea (81km), Mablethorpe (42km), Skegness (49Km) and Cromer (68Km). Images: ©RWE Npower Renewables Ltd. Technology The proposed development will have an installed Capacity of up to 1200 MW. The development proposal Comprises the Construction and operation of up to 288 wind turbine generators with a maximum tip height of up to 220 metres, offshore substations, meteorologiCal stations and underwater Cabling to ConneCt the turbines and substations. The maximum annual eleCtriCity expected to be generated from the wind farm site is equivalent to the approximate domestiC needs of up to 850,000 average UK households. Last Updated: 10/12/2013 Indicative turbine Max number for Max hub height Max rotor Upper blade tip size indicative size for indiCative size diameter for for indiCative indicative size size 3.6MW 288 110m above LAT 125m 160m above LAT 5 MW 240 126m above LAT 150m 190m above LAT 8MW 150 140m above LAT 180m 220m above LAT The options available for the turbine foundations are Considered in the following seCtions and their dimensions given for the indiCative turbine Classes under Consideration. Foundation Concepts are classified under the following types: • Monopile (steel and steel reinforCed ConCrete) - Monopiles rely on the surrounding geology to provide lateral resistanCe to horizontal forces, suCh as wind on the turbine and waves on the support struCture max diameter of 10.5m taking up a maximum area of 97m².
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire. [ Keiii.Y'b
    414 SPILSBY, LINCOLNSHIRE. [ KEIII.Y'B wednesday, at l2 noon. The district comprises the fol­ Spilsby; Stickney sub-district, William Andrew, Stickney; lowing places :-Addlethorpe, Alford, Anderby, Ashby­ deputy, Henry Hand, East Kirkby; Wainflee~ sub-dia. by-Partney, Aswardby, Bilsby-with-Thurlby, Holingbroke, trict, William Peacock Ely Adlard, Market placet Wain­ Bratoft, Brinkhill. Burgh-in-the-Marsh, Calceby, Can­ fleet ; deputy, William Holmes Marshall, Wainfleet dlesby, Claxby, Croft, Cnmberworth, Dalby, Driby, East­ Registrars of Marriages for the Union, John Rimmington, villa, Farlesthorpe, Firsby, Friskney, Gunby St. Peter, Terrace, Spilsby; deputy, Kerkham Gresswell, Halton Hagnaby, Halton Holegate, Hareby, Harrington, Hogs­ road, Spilsby thorpe, H undleby, Huttoft, Ingoldmells, Irby-in-the­ The Workhouse, erected in 1838, is a large structure of brick Marsh, Keal East, Keal West, Kirkby East, Langton-by­ situated in the parish of Hundleby, & will hold 250 in­ Spilsby, Markby, Mavis Endarby, Midville, Mumby-with­ mates; Rev. Harry Greenwood H. A. chaplain; John West Chapel, Orby, South Ormsby-with-Ketsby, Partney, WalkerM.D. medical officer; JohnL. Ironmonger,master; Raithby, Rigsby-with-Ailby, Sausthorpe, Scremby-with­ Mrs. Emma Ironmonger, matron; Miss Elizabeth Wood­ Grebby, Skegness, Skendleby, Spilsby, Steeping Great &. ley, schoolmistress Little, Stick ford, Stickney, Sutterby, Sutton-in-tbe-Marsh, RuRAL SANITARY AuTHORITY. Thorpe St. Peter, Toynton All Saints, Toynton St. Peter, Meet at Board Rooms, Workhouse, Hundleby, alternate Ulceby-with-Fordington, Wainfleet All Saints, Wainfleet thursdays at n noon. St. Mary, Well, Welton-in-the-Marsh with Boothby, Wil­ Clerk, George Walker, Ashby road, Spilsby loughby, Winthorpe & West Fen Treasurer, Thomas Cheney Gartit, Bank, Spilsby Certified Bailiffs under the Law of Distress Amendment Act, Medical Officer of Health, l<'rancis John WalkerH.B.
    [Show full text]