DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Sample Sizes Are Unweighted. All Other Sample Sizes, Including Totals, Are Weighted to Census Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Sample Sizes Are Unweighted. All Other Sample Sizes, Including Totals, Are Weighted to Census Data Region Gender Age Income Education $50K- HS or Total Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Sample Size 807 341 157 184 152 74 50 190 392 415 233 307 267 231 261 162 332 242 233 Regional sample sizes are unweighted. All other sample sizes, including totals, are weighted to census data. Blank cells indicate zero responses were received. Cells containing "0%" are statistically zero, though at least one response was received. *Indicates small sample size Q1. Which party's candidate are you yourself most likely to support in the provincial election expected on June 7? Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Ontario Liberal Party 17% 18% 21% 15% 19% 15% 12% 15% 17% 16% 23% 13% 15% 18% 17% 18% 13% 17% 22% Progressive Conservative 35% 35% 30% 39% 39% 35% 29% 33% 38% 31% 21% 38% 43% 33% 36% 39% 38% 34% 31% Party of Ontario Ontario New Democratic 15% 13% 13% 13% 9% 16% 24% 18% 18% 11% 18% 15% 11% 16% 16% 13% 11% 17% 16% Party Other/Independent 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 2% Undecided /Can't Say 27% 28% 27% 30% 26% 27% 20% 25% 21% 32% 29% 27% 24% 22% 26% 26% 29% 24% 27% Will not vote 4% 4% 6% 2% 4% 2% 6% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 2% 6% 3% 3% 5% 4% 1% Rather not say 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 6% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% Q1/Q2 [Including Leaners] Likely to support Sample Size 762 323 145 178 145 71 45 182 377 385 216 290 256 212 251 157 304 230 228 Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Ontario Liberal Party 21% 23% 29% 18% 23% 18% 16% 18% 21% 21% 29% 15% 19% 19% 21% 25% 16% 20% 27% Progressive Conservative 42% 41% 35% 45% 47% 43% 36% 40% 44% 39% 26% 46% 50% 39% 42% 44% 46% 41% 37% Party of Ontario Ontario New Democratic 19% 17% 17% 17% 10% 22% 31% 24% 21% 17% 23% 20% 15% 22% 19% 16% 16% 21% 20% Party Other/Independent 3% 2% 2% 3% 4% 4% 2% 3% 4% 3% 4% 3% 3% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% Undecided /Can't Say 28% 30% 29% 31% 27% 28% 23% 27% 22% 34% 31% 29% 25% 24% 27% 27% 31% 25% 27% Will not vote 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Rather not say 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% Q1/Q2 [Including Leaners-Decided Voters] Likely to support Sample Size 642 271 122 149 125 60 41 156 337 304 177 243 222 178 214 136 244 197 201 Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Ontario Liberal Party 24% 27% 35% 22% 27% 21% 18% 21% 23% 26% 35% 19% 22% 23% 25% 28% 20% 23% 31% Progressive Conservative 50% 50% 43% 54% 56% 50% 42% 47% 50% 49% 32% 55% 58% 46% 50% 50% 57% 48% 42% Party of Ontario Ontario New Democratic 22% 20% 20% 21% 12% 25% 37% 28% 23% 21% 28% 23% 17% 26% 23% 19% 20% 24% 23% Party Other/Independent 4% 3% 2% 3% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 5% 3% 2% 3% 4% 4% Q3. [Top2box] Would you say you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of each one? Sample Size 807 341 157 184 152 74 50 190 392 415 233 307 267 231 261 162 332 242 233 Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Christine Elliott 37% 38% 34% 41% 38% 35% 38% 33% 37% 36% 20% 35% 53% 28% 39% 41% 33% 35% 44% Doug Ford 27% 32% 26% 36% 20% 30% 22% 21% 26% 27% 16% 33% 28% 28% 26% 27% 31% 27% 19% Caroline Mulroney 30% 28% 30% 26% 28% 27% 33% 37% 34% 27% 26% 31% 32% 30% 30% 32% 29% 29% 33% Tanya Granic Allen 12% 11% 13% 9% 12% 14% 13% 15% 14% 11% 16% 12% 10% 12% 13% 11% 13% 10% 14% Q3. [Bottom2box] Would you say you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of each one? Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Christine Elliott 17% 14% 17% 11% 20% 16% 20% 20% 23% 11% 22% 14% 16% 24% 17% 12% 19% 18% 13% Doug Ford 51% 50% 55% 46% 56% 44% 47% 53% 55% 47% 58% 44% 53% 45% 50% 60% 42% 49% 65% Caroline Mulroney 25% 24% 23% 25% 28% 28% 23% 24% 27% 23% 21% 24% 30% 27% 25% 26% 25% 27% 23% Tanya Granic Allen 35% 37% 37% 36% 34% 34% 33% 35% 41% 30% 30% 32% 44% 35% 34% 38% 33% 35% 39% Q3. [Christine Elliott] Would you say you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of each one? Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Very favourable 14% 16% 14% 18% 14% 16% 6% 11% 16% 12% 3% 13% 24% 14% 13% 15% 15% 13% 12% Moderately favourable 23% 22% 20% 24% 24% 19% 33% 23% 21% 25% 16% 23% 29% 14% 27% 26% 18% 21% 32% Neither favourable nor 47% 48% 50% 47% 42% 50% 41% 47% 40% 52% 58% 51% 31% 48% 44% 47% 48% 48% 43% unfavourable Moderately unfavourable 10% 8% 11% 6% 14% 9% 9% 13% 14% 7% 15% 8% 8% 13% 11% 9% 10% 11% 9% Very unfavourable 7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 6% 11% 7% 9% 4% 7% 5% 8% 10% 6% 3% 8% 7% 4% Top2box 37% 38% 34% 41% 38% 35% 38% 33% 37% 36% 20% 35% 53% 28% 39% 41% 33% 35% 44% Bottom2box 17% 14% 17% 11% 20% 16% 20% 20% 23% 11% 22% 14% 16% 24% 17% 12% 19% 18% 13% Q3. [Doug Ford] Would you say you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of each one? Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Very favourable 11% 13% 14% 13% 7% 10% 10% 10% 14% 8% 6% 13% 12% 11% 12% 11% 13% 9% 8% Moderately favourable 16% 18% 13% 23% 14% 20% 13% 11% 13% 19% 11% 19% 16% 17% 15% 15% 18% 18% 11% Neither favourable nor 23% 18% 18% 18% 23% 26% 31% 26% 19% 26% 26% 23% 20% 27% 24% 13% 26% 24% 16% unfavourable Moderately unfavourable 17% 16% 14% 17% 19% 11% 21% 20% 17% 17% 23% 13% 17% 15% 18% 18% 16% 19% 17% Very unfavourable 34% 34% 41% 29% 37% 33% 26% 34% 37% 31% 35% 32% 35% 30% 32% 42% 27% 30% 48% Top2box 27% 32% 26% 36% 20% 30% 22% 21% 26% 27% 16% 33% 28% 28% 26% 27% 31% 27% 19% Bottom2box 51% 50% 55% 46% 56% 44% 47% 53% 55% 47% 58% 44% 53% 45% 50% 60% 42% 49% 65% Q3. [Caroline Mulroney] Would you say you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of each one? Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Very favourable 7% 5% 6% 5% 6% 4% 11% 11% 8% 6% 9% 7% 5% 5% 7% 7% 9% 4% 6% Moderately favourable 23% 23% 24% 22% 23% 23% 23% 26% 26% 21% 18% 24% 27% 25% 23% 25% 20% 25% 27% Neither favourable nor 45% 48% 47% 49% 44% 45% 44% 39% 39% 50% 53% 45% 38% 43% 46% 42% 46% 45% 43% unfavourable Moderately unfavourable 16% 16% 16% 16% 20% 13% 9% 14% 18% 14% 17% 14% 16% 15% 15% 19% 14% 17% 17% Very unfavourable 9% 8% 7% 8% 8% 15% 14% 10% 9% 10% 4% 9% 14% 12% 9% 7% 12% 9% 7% Top2box 30% 28% 30% 26% 28% 27% 33% 37% 34% 27% 26% 31% 32% 30% 30% 32% 29% 29% 33% Bottom2box 25% 24% 23% 25% 28% 28% 23% 24% 27% 23% 21% 24% 30% 27% 25% 26% 25% 27% 23% Q3. [Tanya Granic Allen] Would you say you have a favourable or unfavourable opinion of each one? Region Gender Age Income Education Total $50K- HS or Hamilton/ South $100K+ Coll/Tech Univ+ 416/905 416 905 East North Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ <$50K <$100K less Niagara west Very favourable 3% 3% 4% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 3% 1% 4% Moderately favourable 10% 8% 9% 8% 9% 11% 10% 12% 10% 10% 13% 8% 8% 9% 10% 8% 10% 9% 10% Neither favourable nor 52% 53% 50% 55% 54% 52% 54% 50% 45% 59% 54% 56% 46% 53% 53% 51% 54% 55% 46% unfavourable Moderately unfavourable 16% 15% 13% 17% 16% 22% 14% 16% 19% 14% 18% 14% 17% 17% 18% 12% 17% 17% 15% Very unfavourable 19% 21% 24% 19% 17% 13% 19% 19% 22% 16% 12% 18% 27% 18% 16% 26% 16% 18% 24% Top2box 12% 11% 13% 9% 12% 14% 13% 15% 14% 11% 16% 12% 10% 12% 13% 11% 13% 10% 14% Bottom2box 35% 37% 37% 36% 34% 34% 33% 35% 41% 30% 30% 32% 44% 35% 34% 38% 33% 35% 39% Q4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proquest Dissertations
    OPPOSITION TO CONSCRIPTION IN ONTARIO 1917 A thesis submitted to the Department of History of the University of Ottawa in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. % L,., A: 6- ''t, '-'rSily O* John R. Witham 1970 UMI Number: EC55241 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform EC55241 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE:IDEOLOGICAL OPPOSITION 8 CHAPTER TWO:THE TRADE UNIONS 33 CHAPTER THREE:THE FARMERS 63 CHAPTER FOUR:THE LIBERAL PARTI 93 CONCLUSION 127 APPENDIX A# Ontario Liberals Sitting in the House of Commons, May and December, 1917 • 131 APPENDIX B. "The Fiery Cross is now uplifted throughout Canada." 132 KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS 135 BIBLIOGRAPHY 136 11 INTRODUCTION The Introduction of conscription in 1917 evoked a deter­ mined, occasionally violent opposition from French Canadians. Their protests were so loud and so persistent that they have tended to obscure the fact that English Canada did not unanimous­ ly support compulsory military service.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Plan with Activities: Political
    LESSON PLAN POLITICAL PARTIES Recommended for Grade 10 Duration: Approximately 60 minutes BACKGROUND INFORMATION Parliamentary Roles: www.ola.org/en/visit-learn/about-ontarios-parliament/ parliamentary-roles LEARNING GOALS This lesson plan is designed to engage students in the political process through participatory activities and a discussion about the various political parties. Students will learn the differences between the major parties of Ontario and how they connect with voters, and gain an understanding of the important elements of partisan politics. INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION (10 minutes) Canada is a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary democracy, founded on the rule of law and respect for rights and freedoms. Ask students which country our system of government is based on. Canada’s parliamentary system stems from the British, or “Westminster,” tradition. Since Canada is a federal state, responsibility for lawmaking is shared among one federal, ten provincial and three territorial governments. Canada shares the same parliamentary system and similar roles as other parliaments in the Commonwealth – countries with historic links to Britain. In our parliament, the Chamber is where our laws are debated and created. There are some important figures who help with this process. Some are partisan and some are non-partisan. What does it mean to be partisan/non-partisan? Who would be voicing their opinions in the Chamber? A helpful analogy is to imagine the Chamber as a game of hockey, where the political parties are the teams playing and the non-partisan roles as the people who make sure the game can happen (ex. referees, announcers, score keepers, etc.) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO POLITICAL PARTIES 01 EXPLANATION (5 minutes) Political Parties: • A political party is a group of people who share the same political beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • C,Anadä LIBERÄL PÄRÏY ORGAI{IZÂTIOII AI{D
    N,flonalLtbrav Bibliothèque nationale l*l du Canada Acquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliog raphic Services Branch des services bibliograPhiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON4 K.lA ON4 Yout l¡le Volre élérence Our lile Noue rclércnce The author has granted an L'auteur a accordé une licence irrevocable non-exclus¡ve licence irrévocable et non exclus¡ve allowing the National Library of permettant à la Bibliothèque Canada to reproduce, loan, nationale du Canada de distribute or sell cop¡es of reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou his/her thesis by any means and vendre des copies de sa thèse in any form or format, making de quelque manière et sous this thesis available to interested quelque forme que ce soit pour persons. mettre des exemplaires de cette thèse à Ia disposition des personnes intéressées. The author retains ownership of L'auteur conserve la propriété du the copyright in his/her thesis. droit d'auteur qu¡ protège sa Neither the thesis nor substantial thèse. Ni la thèse ni des extraits extracts from it may be printed or substantiels de celle-ci ne otherwise reproduced without doivent être imprimés ou his/her permission. autrement reproduits sans son autorisation. ISBN 0-612-13090_8 C,anadä LIBERÄL PÄRÏY ORGAI{IZÂTIOII AI{D }'ANITOBA'S 1995 PROVINCIAL ELECTION BY ROBERT ANDREIJ DRI'I'IMOITD A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfiilment of the requirements of the degree of }TASIER OF ARTS @ 1996 Permission has been granted to the LIBRARY OF THE LTNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA to lend or sell copies of this thesis, to the NATIONAL LIBRARY OF CANADA to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and LIBRARY MICROFILMS to publish an abstract of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • In Crisis Or Decline? Selecting Women to Lead Provincial Parties in Government
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Arts Arts Research & Publications 2018-06 In Crisis or Decline? Selecting Women to Lead Provincial Parties in Government Thomas, Melanee Cambridge University Press Thomas, M. (2018). In Crisis or Decline? Selecting Women to Lead Provincial Parties in Government. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 51(2), 379-403. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/107552 journal article Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca In Crisis or Decline? Selecting Women to Lead Provincial Parties in Government By Melanee Thomas Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Abstract: The majority of Canada’s women premiers were selected to that office while their parties held government. This is uncommon, both in the comparative literature and amongst premiers who are men. What explains this gendered selection pattern to Canada’s provincial premiers’ offices? This paper explores the most common explanation found in the comparative literature for women’s emergence as leaders of electorally competitive parties and as chief political executives: women are more likely to be selected when that party is in crisis or decline. Using the population of women provincial premiers in Canada as case studies, evidence suggests 3 of 8 women premiers were selected to lead parties in government that were in crisis or decline; a fourth was selected to lead a small, left-leaning party as predicted by the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Federal Election: Result and Analysis
    2019 Federal Election: Result and Analysis O C T O B E R 22, 2 0 1 9 NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS 157 121 24 3 32 (-20) (+26) (-15) (+1) (+22) Comparison between results reflected based on party standings at dissolution of the 42nd parliament • The Liberal Party of Canada (LPC) won a second mandate, although was diminished to minority status. • The result of the 43rd Canadian election is one of the closest in recent memory, with both the Liberals and Conservatives separated by little more than one percentage point. Conservatives share of vote is slightly higher than the Liberals, making major gains in key areas for the party • Bloc Quebecois (BQ) is a winner in this election, moving up to official party status which will give the party added resources as well as significance in the House of Commons • The NDP managed to win enough seats to potentially play an important role in the House of Commons, but the party took a big hit in Quebec — where they were only able to hold one of the Layton era “Orange Wave” seats • Maxime Bernier, who started the People’s Party of Canada after narrowly losing the Conservative leadership contest in 2017, lost the seat he has held onto since 2006 • The former Treasury Board president Dr. Jane Philpott, who ran as an independent following her departure from the liberal caucus, lost her seat in Markham Stouffville to former Liberal MPP and Ontario Minister of Health, Dr. Helena Jaczek. Jody Wilson-Raybould won as an independent in Vancouver Granville NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS 10 2 32 3 39 24 PARTY STANDINGS AT
    [Show full text]
  • THE AMERICAN IMPRINT on ALBERTA POLITICS Nelson Wiseman University of Toronto
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Winter 2011 THE AMERICAN IMPRINT ON ALBERTA POLITICS Nelson Wiseman University of Toronto Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the American Studies Commons, Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons Wiseman, Nelson, "THE AMERICAN IMPRINT ON ALBERTA POLITICS" (2011). Great Plains Quarterly. 2657. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/2657 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THE AMERICAN IMPRINT ON ALBERTA POLITICS NELSON WISEMAN Characteristics assigned to America's clas­ the liberal society in Tocqueville's Democracy sical liberal ideology-rugged individualism, in America: high status was accorded the self­ market capitalism, egalitarianism in the sense made man, laissez-faire defined the economic of equality of opportunity, and fierce hostility order, and a multiplicity of religious sects com­ toward centralized federalism and socialism­ peted in the market for salvation.l Secondary are particularly appropriate for fathoming sources hint at this thesis in their reading of Alberta's political culture. In this article, I the papers of organizations such as the United contend that Alberta's early American settlers Farmers of Alberta (UFA) and Alberta's were pivotal in shaping Alberta's political cul­ Social Credit Party.2 This article teases out its ture and that Albertans have demonstrated a hypothesis from such secondary sources and particular affinity for American political ideas covers new ground in linking the influence and movements.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Turncoats, Opportunists, and Political Whores': Floor Crossers in Ontario
    “‘Turncoats, Opportunists, and Political Whores’: Floor Crossers in Ontario Political History” By Patrick DeRochie 2011-12 Intern Ontario Legislature Internship Programme (OLIP) 1303A Whitney Block Queen’s Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 Phone: 416-325-0040 [email protected] www.olipinterns.ca www.facebook.com/olipinterns www.twitter.com/olipinterns Paper presented at the 2012 Annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Edmonton, Alberta Friday, June 15th, 2012. Draft: DO NOT CITE 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people for their support, advice and openness in helping me complete this research paper: Gilles Bisson Sean Conway Steve Gilchrist Henry Jacek Sylvia Jones Rosario Marchese Lynn Morrison Graham Murray David Ramsay Greg Sorbara Lise St-Denis David Warner Graham White 3 INTRODUCTION When the October 2011 Ontario general election saw Premier Dalton McGuinty’s Liberals win a “major minority”, there was speculation at Queen’s Park that a Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP) from the Progressive Conservative (PC) Party or New Democratic Party (NDP) would be induced to cross the floor. The Liberals had captured fifty-three of 107 seats; the PCs and NDP, thirty-seven and seventeen, respectively. A Member of one of the opposition parties defecting to join the Liberals would have definitively changed the balance of power in the Legislature. Even with the Speaker coming from the Liberals’ ranks, a floor crossing would give the Liberals a de facto majority and sufficient seats to drive forward their legislative agenda without having to rely on at least one of the opposition parties. A January article in the Toronto Star revealed that the Liberals had quietly made overtures to at least four PC and NDP MPPs since the October election, 1 meaning that a floor crossing was a very real possibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity Politicking: New Candidacies and Representations in Contemporary Canadian Politics
    Identity Politicking: New Candidacies and Representations in Contemporary Canadian Politics by Teresa-Elise Maiolino A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology University of Toronto © Copyright by Teresa-Elise Maiolino 2017 Identity Politicking: New Candidacies and Representations in Contemporary Canadian Politics Teresa-Elise Maiolino Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology University of Toronto 2017 Abstract This dissertation centres on the candidacies and leaderships of three politicians—Justin Trudeau, Olivia Chow, and Kathleen Wynne. It examines the ways in which gender, race, sexuality, and other salient aspects of politicians’ identities are strategically negotiated and mobilized by politicians, political actors, the media, and the grassroots. The cases herein question the extent to which identity matters in Canadian electoral politics at the municipal, provincial, and federal levels, bridging sociological understandings of power and authority with feminist analyses of identity. The project engages broadly with qualitative methods—discourse analysis, media analysis, participant observation, and interviewing. The research contributes to understandings of: (1) the durability of masculinity in Canadian electoral politics; (2) dispositional requirements for leaders; (3) the compensatory labour that minority politicians perform; (4) alignments and allegiances between politicians and grassroots movements. The first case of the dissertation examines media coverage of a charity-boxing match between Liberal Member of Parliament Justin Trudeau and Conservative Canadian Senator Patrick Brazeau. It offers the concept recuperative gender strategies to describe how political leaders work to restore their public gender identities. The second case is focused on the candidacy of visible minority Toronto mayoral candidate, Olivia Chow.
    [Show full text]
  • Um 1897, Testimony & Exhibits, 2/12/2018
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1897 In the Matter of ) ) HYDRO ONE LIMITED, ) ) Application for Authorization to Exercise ) Substantial Influence over Policies and ) Actions of AVISTA CORPORATION. ) ) REPLY TESTIMONY OF THE OREGON CITIZENS’ UTILITY BOARD February 12th, 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................2 Background of Hydro One ...........................................................................................................4 Risks ..............................................................................................................................................7 Political Risk ................................................................................................................................7 North American Free Trade Agreement Risk ............................................................................14 Post-Transaction Corporate Structure ........................................................................................17 Double Leverage Holding Company ..........................................................................................19 Why Avista .................................................................................................................................24 Benefits ..........................................................................................................................................27 Exhibits
    [Show full text]
  • Counting Votes: Essays on Electoral Reform
    Copyright ©2016 by the Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permis- sion except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. As the researchers have worked independently, the views and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the Board of Direc- tors of the Fraser Institute, the staff, or supporters. Date of issue: October 2016. Printed and bound in Canada. Cover design and artwork: Bart Allen Fraser Institute d www.fraserinstitute.org Counting Votes: Essays on Electoral Reform Lydia Miljan, editor FRASER I N S T I T U T E Fraser Institute d www.fraserinstitute.org Contents Preface ............................................... i Chapter 1: First-Past-the-Post: Empowered Voters, Accountable Government John Pepall ...................................... 1 Chapter 2: Electoral Rules and Fiscal Policy Outcomes Jason Clemens, Taylor Jackson, Steve LaFleur, and Joel Emes ...................................... 21 Chapter 3: The Consequences of the Alternative Vote Lydia Miljan and Taylor Jackson .................... 45 Chapter 4: The Imperative of a Referendum Patrice Dutil ........................................ 81 Publishing information .................... 104 Purpose, funding, and independence ....... 105 About the Fraser Institute .................. 105 Editorial Advisory Board ................... 106 www.fraserinstitute.org d Fraser Institute Preface In its December Speech from the Throne, Justin Trudeau’s government reaffirmed the Liberal party’s campaign promise that 2015 would be the last election held under first-past-the-post (FPTP). While the government has no preference as to what should replace the 150-year-old FPTP system, it has ruled out holding a referendum to help guide the choice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Questionnaire Used in This Survey
    1 Ontario 2018 Election May 14th Today we are doing a short survey asking people about some important public issues here in Ontario. 1. As you probably know, an Ontario election will be held in a few weeks, on June 7th. As far as you are concerned, what would you say are the most important issues in this election? (If your main issue isn’t on this list, please type it in at the space below.) [MULTIPLE RESPONSE -- ALLOW UP TO 3 SELECTIONS] [KEEP ISSUES WITHIN THE “BLOCKS” BELOW. RANDOMIZE PRESENTATION OF BLOCKS AND RANDOMIZE ISSUES LISTED WITHIN EACH BLOCK.] The economy Jobs/Unemployment Deficit/Debt/Government spending Taxes Public sector jobs Health Care Education Social services – welfare, daycare, public housing Policy for the production, sale and use of marijuana Environment Community issues – safety, recreation, traffic Infrastructure/Roads and bridges Public transit/TTC Energy / Electricity / Hydro Leadership/Politics Corruption/Integrity/Ethics [FIX POSITION] Other Issue (Specify:) 2. Overall, do you think Ontario is on the right track, or the wrong track? Right track Wrong track Not sure 3. As you consider the choices in this election, which of the following considerations is MOST important to you in making up your mind as to who to support? 1 2 [SINGLE RESPONSE – RANDOMIZE] The parties’ policies on the issues The party leaders The individual candidates running in your constituency 4. As of right now, how certain are you about which party you will vote for in this Ontario election? (If you already voted at an advance poll, please indicate that). Would you say you are ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Funding of Political Parties in Ontario"
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 2 Volume 27, Number 1 (Spring 1989) The undinF g of Political Parties in Ontario Keith D. Ewing Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Ewing, Keith D.. "The undF ing of Political Parties in Ontario." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 27.1 (1989) : 27-91. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol27/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. THE FUNDING OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN ONTARIO" By KEITH D. EWING* I. THE ORIGINS OF THE LEGISLATION .......... 28 A. The Camp Commission Recommendations ...... 29 II. THE ELECTION FINANCES REFORM ACT 1975... 34 A. Registration . ........................... 35 B. Contributions .......................... 37 C. Regulating Campaign Expenses .............. 40 D. Public Funding ......................... 42 E. Enforcement ........................... 45 III. IMPACT OF THE LEGISLATION ON POLITICAL FUND-RAISING .......................... 48 A. New Fund-Raising Techniques .............. 48 B. Changing Patterns of Coiporate Dependence ..... 53 C. FinancialInequality ...................... 57 IV. FURTHER REFORM - BILL 103 ............... 62 A. Political Pressure in Ontario ................ 62 B. Developments Elsewhere in Canada ........... 68 C. The Liberal-NDP Coalition Government ........ 74 V. CONCLUSION: IS FURTHER REFORM POSSIBLE? ............................. 80 A. A Ban on Corporate Contributions? ........... 82 B. The Charteras a Limit to Further Refonn ...... 85 Copyright, 1989, K.D. Ewing. Lecturer in Law, University of Cambridge. Much of the research on which this paper is based was conducted during visits to Osgoode Hall Law School in 1982 and 1986.
    [Show full text]