DOCSLIB.ORG

The Funding of Political Parties in Ontario"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Funding of Political Parties in Ontario Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 2 Volume 27, Number 1 (Spring 1989) The undinF g of Political Parties in Ontario Keith D. Ewing Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Ewing, Keith D.. "The undF ing of Political Parties in Ontario." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 27.1 (1989) : 27-91. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol27/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. THE FUNDING OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN ONTARIO" By KEITH D. EWING* I. THE ORIGINS OF THE LEGISLATION .......... 28 A. The Camp Commission Recommendations ...... 29 II. THE ELECTION FINANCES REFORM ACT 1975... 34 A. Registration . ........................... 35 B. Contributions .......................... 37 C. Regulating Campaign Expenses .............. 40 D. Public Funding ......................... 42 E. Enforcement ........................... 45 III. IMPACT OF THE LEGISLATION ON POLITICAL FUND-RAISING .......................... 48 A. New Fund-Raising Techniques .............. 48 B. Changing Patterns of Coiporate Dependence ..... 53 C. FinancialInequality ...................... 57 IV. FURTHER REFORM - BILL 103 ............... 62 A. Political Pressure in Ontario ................ 62 B. Developments Elsewhere in Canada ........... 68 C. The Liberal-NDP Coalition Government ........ 74 V. CONCLUSION: IS FURTHER REFORM POSSIBLE? ............................. 80 A. A Ban on Corporate Contributions? ........... 82 B. The Charteras a Limit to Further Refonn ...... 85 Copyright, 1989, K.D. Ewing. Lecturer in Law, University of Cambridge. Much of the research on which this paper is based was conducted during visits to Osgoode Hall Law School in 1982 and 1986. The author is grateful to the faculty and staff of the School for their hospitality and assistance in preparing the paper. The author would like to thank particularly Neil Belmore, Harry Glasbeek, Reuben Hasson, Allan Hutchinson, and Andrew Ranachan. OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL [VOL. 27 NO. 1 I. THE ORIGINS OF THE LEGISLATION Ontario's legislation relating to financing of political campaigns was enacted for several reasons, but perhaps the most important are the suspicions of corruption which followed Conservative party fund raisers. Canada is a country where allegations of corrupt practices by big business have never been far from the surface,1 and historically Ontario was no exception to this feature of national politics. In 1966 a member of the provincial legislature demanded an investigation into allegations that a Conservative party fund raiser gave the impression to representatives of Melchers Distillers Ltd that he might be able to influence the Liquor Control Board of Ontario on behalf of the Company.2 Not long after the 1963 election in relation to which the allegation was made, there was a general increase in liquor prices. It was alleged the Canadian distillers, including Melchers, who contributed to the Conservatives' election fund recovered their investment within a few months; as a result, Ontario consumers indirectly defrayed a part of the election expenses of the Conservatives.3 The provincial Premier denied that there was any truth in the allegations, and he rejected calls for an independent judicial inquiry. But the allegations clearly wounded the Tory establishment. The Premier gave an undertaking that a Select Committee would be appointed "to carry out a 4 complete study of our electoral system." It was over six years, however, before any serious investigation into campaign financing took place. The Conservative government only took action as a result of another charge of corruption. In 1972, it was claimed in the Legislature that a government contract to build a new Workman's Compensation Building was awarded to a corporation in return for a donation of 1 For an account, see Z.K. Paltiel, PoliticalParyFinancing it Canada (Toronto: McGraw- Hill Co., 1970). 2 Ontario, Legislative Assembly, Debates: Official Report, 4th Sess., 27th Leg. (Toronto: Queen's Printer, 1966) (24 March 1966) cols. 1861-2513. 3 Ibid, cols. 2510-13. 4 Ibid, col. 2513. 1989] The Funding of Political Parties 29 fifty thousand dollars to Conservative party funds.5 In response to this affair, the government referred the matter to the Camp Commission, which had been set up in June 1972 to study the functions of the Legislative Assembly, with particular reference to the role of private members and how their participation in the process of government could be enlarged. In referring this additional matter of party and election campaign financing to the Commission, the Premier said: To the greatest extent possible, I would want to maintain a political system in which the various parties can function and campaign for public support freely and openly and6 ... in an atmosphere above and beyond public doubt, suspicion or cynicism.... Whether or not there was any truth in the allegations which had been made was to some extent irrelevant: ... the Watergate scandal to the South, and some public questioning of relationships between the government and individuals in the private sector in Ontario had led to widespread concern regarding the morality of the political process, and the risk that large corporations which regularly donated major sums to governing parties, could be in a position to unduly influence government. In order to ensure in the ordinary citizen confidence that his participation in the political process was in fact election financing legislation be accepted meaningful, it7 was essential that Ontario and enforced. A. The Camp Commission Recommendations The Camp Commission made three general recommendations. First, it gave a muted attack on the traditional practice in the political system not to disclose either the source of party funds or the disposition of them. In a remarkable passage See Ontario, Legislative Assembly, Debates: Official Report, 2d Sess., 29th Leg. (Toronto: Queen's Printer, 1972) (17 March 1972) col. 533; (21 November 1972) col. 4705; (6 December 1972) cols. 5257-58; (12 December 1972) col. 5489; and (December 1972) cols. 5503-04. 6 Ontario, Commission on the Legislature, Third Report (Toronto: The Commission, 1974) at 3 (Chairman: Dalton Camp) [hereinafter the Camp Report]. 7 Ontario, Commission on Election Contributions and Expenses, The Commission: Ten years later,1975-1985: Reflections on PoliticalFinancing in Ontario (Toronto: The Commission, 1985) at 3. OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL [VOL. 27 NO. 1 about the common practice in a modern liberal democracy, the Commission noted that "it would be difficult to make even an informed guess as to the total sums raised annually in Canada by politicians and parties......8 Second, the Commission reiterated the need to ensure that the parties had sufficient funds: "In any system close to the ideal, a political party with a reasonable base of public support ought to have adequate funds so that it can maintain an efficient level of research, organization and communications capacity between elections, and campaign effectively during elections."9 The third recommendation of the Commission was to reduce the dependence of the parties on institutional support and to extend the popular base of party financing: ... there is too little genuine incentive for the party to give proper emphasis to the smaller contributor, or to broaden the base of party financing. A free, open, and democratic political system ought to have a greater reliance upon general public support and ought not to depend, for its continuance, on the generosity of a segment of the community. Certainly, when political parties rightfully have their influence upon Members in the Legislature, the parties themselves cannot be deemed to be free of the risk of undue or disproportionate influence of those who 1 0 pay their bills.... As a means to achieve these goals, the Commission considered but rejected two proposed methods, each of which has been adopted in Canada or elsewhere. The first proposal was for large scale public funding of political parties. The Commission rejected this method for three reasons: (1) if money was to be apportioned according to political success, it would discriminate in favour of the "ins" against the "outs;"11 (2) if all parties were to be treated in the same way, this would favour minority parties at the expense of major ones;12 (3) and finally, this method would present a dilemma in respect of independent candidates - they would either have to prohibited altogether or financed even if there was suspicion they were "seeking notoriety or self-aggrandizement ... at 8 Camp Report, supra, note 6 at 2. 9 Ibid at 5. 10 Ibid at 6. 11 Ibid at 9-11. 12 Ibid. at 10. 1989] The Funding of Political Parties public expense."13 The Commission instead recommended striking a balance between private contributions and public funding by encouraging the parties to broaden their base by going out to organize support. To facilitate this it recommended the introduction of a tax credit system for political donations.14 In addition, the Commission made the further recommendation that a limited reimbursement from public funds should be made to candidates for election in order to help ensure that credible candidates may mount credible campaigns.15 However, no public funding was recommended for the parties; the extent of the state's contribution was limited to the encouragement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proquest Dissertations
    OPPOSITION TO CONSCRIPTION IN ONTARIO 1917 A thesis submitted to the Department of History of the University of Ottawa in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. % L,., A: 6- ''t, '-'rSily O* John R. Witham 1970 UMI Number: EC55241 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI UMI Microform EC55241 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE:IDEOLOGICAL OPPOSITION 8 CHAPTER TWO:THE TRADE UNIONS 33 CHAPTER THREE:THE FARMERS 63 CHAPTER FOUR:THE LIBERAL PARTI 93 CONCLUSION 127 APPENDIX A# Ontario Liberals Sitting in the House of Commons, May and December, 1917 • 131 APPENDIX B. "The Fiery Cross is now uplifted throughout Canada." 132 KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS 135 BIBLIOGRAPHY 136 11 INTRODUCTION The Introduction of conscription in 1917 evoked a deter­ mined, occasionally violent opposition from French Canadians. Their protests were so loud and so persistent that they have tended to obscure the fact that English Canada did not unanimous­ ly support compulsory military service.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Plan with Activities: Political
    LESSON PLAN POLITICAL PARTIES Recommended for Grade 10 Duration: Approximately 60 minutes BACKGROUND INFORMATION Parliamentary Roles: www.ola.org/en/visit-learn/about-ontarios-parliament/ parliamentary-roles LEARNING GOALS This lesson plan is designed to engage students in the political process through participatory activities and a discussion about the various political parties. Students will learn the differences between the major parties of Ontario and how they connect with voters, and gain an understanding of the important elements of partisan politics. INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION (10 minutes) Canada is a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary democracy, founded on the rule of law and respect for rights and freedoms. Ask students which country our system of government is based on. Canada’s parliamentary system stems from the British, or “Westminster,” tradition. Since Canada is a federal state, responsibility for lawmaking is shared among one federal, ten provincial and three territorial governments. Canada shares the same parliamentary system and similar roles as other parliaments in the Commonwealth – countries with historic links to Britain. In our parliament, the Chamber is where our laws are debated and created. There are some important figures who help with this process. Some are partisan and some are non-partisan. What does it mean to be partisan/non-partisan? Who would be voicing their opinions in the Chamber? A helpful analogy is to imagine the Chamber as a game of hockey, where the political parties are the teams playing and the non-partisan roles as the people who make sure the game can happen (ex. referees, announcers, score keepers, etc.) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO POLITICAL PARTIES 01 EXPLANATION (5 minutes) Political Parties: • A political party is a group of people who share the same political beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Party International
    .J J J .J Freedom Party Life. Liberty. Property. Freedom Party Of Ontario July, 2016 240 Commissioners Road West, London, ant. N6J 1Y1 Phone: (519) 681-3999 e-mail: [email protected] Website: www.freedompartyon.ca Dear Members, Friends and Supporters, Given the uncertainty surrounding persistent threats of a mail strike/lockout, our planned June mailer of your enclosed newsletter was unfortunately delayed. Our July edition of Fp NEWS & Commentary #11 touches upon only a fraction of the events, campaigns and activities in which Freedom Party is currently engaged. So, especially for those of you who may not have been able to keep up with our regular on-line updates, here, in a nutshell, is a brief summary of recent developments: With Ontario's Progressive Conservative Party leader Patrick Brown's announcement that his party's philosophy on climate change and on carbon pricing was no different than that of the other parties in the legislature (see May's Fp NEWS & Commentary #10), FP's campaign for the 2018 Ontario general election was set into motion. Our first official Media Release challenging Ontario premier Kathleen Wynne's plans to phase out natural gas from home heating in Ontario caused a reaction that has yet to dissipate, and will no doubt remain a contentious issue well into the next election. Everything you need to know about these developments is detailed in your enclosed copy of Fp NEWS & Commentary. Of course, Climate Change policies and Ontario's energy cost crisis will be among the leading concerns taking us into the next election.
    [Show full text]
  • C,Anadä LIBERÄL PÄRÏY ORGAI{IZÂTIOII AI{D
    N,flonalLtbrav Bibliothèque nationale l*l du Canada Acquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliog raphic Services Branch des services bibliograPhiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON4 K.lA ON4 Yout l¡le Volre élérence Our lile Noue rclércnce The author has granted an L'auteur a accordé une licence irrevocable non-exclus¡ve licence irrévocable et non exclus¡ve allowing the National Library of permettant à la Bibliothèque Canada to reproduce, loan, nationale du Canada de distribute or sell cop¡es of reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou his/her thesis by any means and vendre des copies de sa thèse in any form or format, making de quelque manière et sous this thesis available to interested quelque forme que ce soit pour persons. mettre des exemplaires de cette thèse à Ia disposition des personnes intéressées. The author retains ownership of L'auteur conserve la propriété du the copyright in his/her thesis. droit d'auteur qu¡ protège sa Neither the thesis nor substantial thèse. Ni la thèse ni des extraits extracts from it may be printed or substantiels de celle-ci ne otherwise reproduced without doivent être imprimés ou his/her permission. autrement reproduits sans son autorisation. ISBN 0-612-13090_8 C,anadä LIBERÄL PÄRÏY ORGAI{IZÂTIOII AI{D }'ANITOBA'S 1995 PROVINCIAL ELECTION BY ROBERT ANDREIJ DRI'I'IMOITD A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfiilment of the requirements of the degree of }TASIER OF ARTS @ 1996 Permission has been granted to the LIBRARY OF THE LTNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA to lend or sell copies of this thesis, to the NATIONAL LIBRARY OF CANADA to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and LIBRARY MICROFILMS to publish an abstract of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • In Crisis Or Decline? Selecting Women to Lead Provincial Parties in Government
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Arts Arts Research & Publications 2018-06 In Crisis or Decline? Selecting Women to Lead Provincial Parties in Government Thomas, Melanee Cambridge University Press Thomas, M. (2018). In Crisis or Decline? Selecting Women to Lead Provincial Parties in Government. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 51(2), 379-403. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/107552 journal article Unless otherwise indicated, this material is protected by copyright and has been made available with authorization from the copyright owner. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca In Crisis or Decline? Selecting Women to Lead Provincial Parties in Government By Melanee Thomas Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Abstract: The majority of Canada’s women premiers were selected to that office while their parties held government. This is uncommon, both in the comparative literature and amongst premiers who are men. What explains this gendered selection pattern to Canada’s provincial premiers’ offices? This paper explores the most common explanation found in the comparative literature for women’s emergence as leaders of electorally competitive parties and as chief political executives: women are more likely to be selected when that party is in crisis or decline. Using the population of women provincial premiers in Canada as case studies, evidence suggests 3 of 8 women premiers were selected to lead parties in government that were in crisis or decline; a fourth was selected to lead a small, left-leaning party as predicted by the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Election: Seat Clusters June to September Survey Results
    2019 Election: Seat Clusters June to September Survey Results August 2019 2 Overview In Canada, we count seats, not vote. Just like in American Presidential elections, you can win the popular vote and lose the election. In fact, that happened to Justin Trudeau’s father in 1979. The general way analysts address that is to look at seats by region. However, seats in the same region can move differently. This release tries to get closer to reality in the seat-by-seat contest. Our analysis combines two projects: • An analysis of federal election districts (which we call “seats”) that groups them into 14 clusters based on which parties are most competitive in those seats. Given the shifting dynamics of Canada’s party system, we have relied on only the results of the past two elections. However, to assess where the parties stand in these 14 seat clusters, we need a lot of data. • A merge of the most recent three national surveys that include federal votes, creating a unweighted total of 7,555 respondents and a weighted total of 4,900. In each of our surveys, we collect postal codes. That allows us to create a riding variable for almost all our respondents and to group their responses by the riding they are in. The deck below shows the output from the analysis. The key finding is that, with the NDP in the doldrums, the Liberals are in a strong position coming into the race. Not only have they cemented their hold on last elections core seats, they may be able to gain seats to offsets the losses they will likely experience in the Toronto and Vancouver suburbs and Atlantic Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Party of Ontario, a Fully-Registered Political Party
    I by the 'in the the interests ther group nOt Only ·m at a ured Or nOt H,,,,, an 'O""'''n9 QU''',on, Wh'n w., 'h, "., tIme a PolIticIan promised YOu lower tax"~' Here's an even better One: Wh­ a POlitician' promiserl believed it? Now here's OUr YOu paId lower tal YOU prObably Car Taxes levied by all I isen steadily year by ns have consc onal income -__ e- re taking mOre thar 's pay, not cOUntin( h '.' . hJ0-- "' -'~:".. ..;"',-' . ..... ' . :~:. .:- :: ....:~-: . .. GETTING THE BALL ROLLING :.. OPE ER S by Robert Metz Although t~is is the second issue of Freedom Flyer, it is really the arbitrary regulations the city was about to (and did) impose on our first newsletter that is indicative of a working, functioning retailers of 'sexually-oriented' books and magazines. Mr. political party. Wheable's advice is particularly valuable in helping to establish a Our being a little late in getting it out to you is another definite proper perspective on what action and advocacy is or is not sign of that activity. So much has happened since we launched politically viable within his given political medium: that of Freedom Party from our newly established headquarters in municipal school boards. London last January, that it has had a direct effect on our ability to get this newsletter printed and distributed according to our The object of some of Mr. Wheable's criticism was the advice of originally anticipated schedule. But over the coming months, we Marc Emery, a downtown London businessman and publisher. fully expect to be back on that schedule, now that a lot of the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of the Cooperative Commonwealth
    THE RISE AND DECLINE OF THE COOPERATIVE COMMONWEALTH FEDERATION IN ONTARIO AND QUEBEC DURING WORLD WAR II, 1939 – 1945 By Charles A. Deshaies B. A. State University of New York at Potsdam, 1987 M. A. State University of New York at Empire State, 2005 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine December 2019 Advisory Committee: Scott W. See, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-advisor Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History, Co-advisor Nathan Godfried, Professor of History Stephen Miller, Professor of History Howard Cody, Professor Emeritus of Political Science Copyright 2019 Charles A. Deshaies All Rights Reserved ii THE RISE AND DECLINE OF THE COOPERATIVE COMMONWEALTH FEDERATION IN ONTARIO AND QUEBEC DURING WORLD WAR II, 1939 – 1945 By Charles A. Deshaies Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Scott See and Dr. Jacques Ferland An Abstract of the Thesis Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) December 2019 The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) was one of the most influential political parties in Canadian history. Without doubt, from a social welfare perspective, the CCF helped build and develop an extensive social welfare system across Canada. It has been justly credited with being one of the major influences over Canadian social welfare policy during the critical years following the Great Depression. This was especially true of the period of the Second World War when the federal Liberal government of Mackenzie King adroitly borrowed CCF policy planks to remove the harsh edges of capitalism and put Canada on the path to a modern Welfare State.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real House Lives Strengthening the Role of Mps in an Age of Partisanship
    SAMARA’S MP EXIT INTERVIEWS: VOLUME II The Real House Lives Strengthening the role of MPs in an age of partisanship REPORT ONE: MPs IN PARLIAMENT REPORT TWO: MPs IN THEIR CONSTITUENCY REPORT THREE: MPs IN THEIR POLITICAL PARTY “Empty, nihilistic, repetitive partisanship tires everyone out. It’s exhausting. It’s frustrating. It’s humiliating, sometimes, for those taking part. And it’s alienating for citizens. But—we need strong parties. A more urbane and civil approach to partisanship, but stronger parties … I don’t think we’re convincing large numbers of Canadians that being part of a political party is going to help them or that they’ll enjoy it or it’ll give them some benefit. Because none of our parties fully reflect the country. The complexity. They don’t engage people.EMBARGOED Just as Parliament doesn’t, and our democracy doesn’t to the extent that we would like. So: less partisanship,COPY stronger parties.” 2 Contents INTRODUCING SAMARA’S MP EXIT INTERVIEWS: VOLUME II 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 WHO PARTICIPATED? 8 INTRODUCTION 9 THE JOB DESCRIPTION: MPs IN THE PARTY 12 KEEP IT IN THE FAMILY: HOW MPs DESCRIBE LIFE IN THE PARTY 13 Partisanship: “Must die on every hill!” 13 “Sit in the sauna and talk about things” 16 Seeking common ground 17 “I will not look you in the eye and lie to you” 17 THE LOCAL PARTY: “IT’S A KIND OF FAKE DEMOCRACY” 19 Riding associations: Patchwork quilt 20 Recruitment: “You don’t say no to Jack” 21 Nomination: “Fighting brothers and sisters, or not at all” 21 Playing the long game through the local level 22 CAUCUS: NO SORE LOSERS 24 Bonding: “Where I wanted to be” 24 Mentorship: “The general assumption is that everybody wants your job” 26 Caucus meetings: Deliberation or briefing? 27 “If you don’t want to abide by [our] values, get the hell out!” 29 “The individual loses power as the election comes closer” 30 “You cannot explain it to somebody on the outside” 31 LEADERS: “HUMANITY PERSONIFIED” 33 A remote presence 34 Courtesans 36 Staffers: “I saw them as support.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Political Forum Website: Email: [email protected]
    June 14, 2018 - Vol. 7 No.11 Discussion on Ontario Election Results Discussion on Ontario Election Results • People's Rally on Queen's Park • New Government Lacks Consent of the Governed Despite Majority • Working People Speak Out About Their Concerns • Endorsements of Monopoly-Owned Media - Henri Denis Agenda of the New Government • Transition Begins in Ontario - Enver Villamizar • Champions of Private Interests on PC Transition Team - Mira Katz 23 Years Ago -- From the Party Press • Should the Workers Be Ecstatic That Ontario Is "Open for Business"? - TML Daily, June 13, 1995 For Your Information • 2018 Ontario General Election Province-Wide Results 1 Discussion on Ontario Election Results Saturday, June 30 -- 11:00 am-2:00 pm Queen's Park, Toronto Facebook Forty-two per cent of eligible voters did not cast a ballot in the June 7 Ontario election. Of the 58 per cent that did, 40.49 per cent voted for the PCs and Doug Ford. This is said to be a decisive majority which gives him a mandate to implement the measures he campaigned on. However, the vote that allows the PCs to form the government with 76 out of 124 seats came from only 23.48 per cent of eligible voters. To say this is a majority government tells us something about the state of the electoral system said to be a representative democracy. The NDP becomes the official opposition with 40 seats and 33.57 per cent of the votes cast, representing 19.47 per cent of eligible voters. The Liberals received seven seats and 19.59 per cent of the votes cast, which represents 11.35 percent of eligible voters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left During the Long Sixties
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-13-2019 1:00 PM 'To Waffleo t the Left:' The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left during the Long Sixties David G. Blocker The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Fleming, Keith The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in History A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © David G. Blocker 2019 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons Recommended Citation Blocker, David G., "'To Waffleo t the Left:' The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left during the Long Sixties" (2019). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6554. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6554 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Abstract The Sixties were time of conflict and change in Canada and beyond. Radical social movements and countercultures challenged the conservatism of the preceding decade, rejected traditional forms of politics, and demanded an alternative based on the principles of social justice, individual freedom and an end to oppression on all fronts. Yet in Canada a unique political movement emerged which embraced these principles but proposed that New Left social movements – the student and anti-war movements, the women’s liberation movement and Canadian nationalists – could bring about radical political change not only through street protests and sit-ins, but also through participation in electoral politics.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Election: Seat Clusters October Survey Results
    2019 Election: Seat Clusters October Survey Results October 2019 2 Overview In Canada, we count seats, not votes. Just like in American Presidential elections, you can win the popular vote and lose the election. In fact, that happened to Justin Trudeau’s father in 1979. The general way analysts address that is to look at seats by region. However, seats in the same region can move differently. This release tries to get closer to reality in the seat-by-seat contest. Our analysis combines two projects: • An analysis of federal election districts (which we call “seats”) that groups them into 14 clusters based on which parties are most competitive in those seats. Given the shifting dynamics of Canada’s party system, we have relied on only the results of the past two elections. However, to assess where the parties stand in these 14 seat clusters, we need a lot of data. • A merge of the most recent three national surveys that include federal votes, creating an unweighted total of 5,229 respondents and a weighted total of 4,500. In each of our surveys, we collect postal codes. That allows us to create a riding variable for almost all our respondents and to group their responses by riding. The deck to follow shows the output from the analysis. 3 Online Sample Methodology: October 2019 • This report combines the results of two online surveys conducted in October 2019. • In total, the dataset contains a representative sample of n= 4,500 Canadians, 18 years or older. Online samples for the Tracking survey of the surveys were provided by Lucid, while the Ad Testing survey sample was provided by Dynata, both leading providers of online samples.
    [Show full text]