Quarterly Report January -March 2005

Social Investment Program Project (SIPP)

Process Monitoring Consultancy Services for SIPP

in association with

ITAD CNRS Information, Training And Center for Natural Resource Studies Development House # 14 (2nd Floor), Road # 13/C 12, English Business Park Block # E, Banani English Close Dhaka-1213 Hove Bangladesh BN3 7ET U.K. Telephone: +880-2-9886700 Telephone: +44 1273 7654 250 Fax: +880-2-9886700 Fax: +44 1272 7653 251 email: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] 12th February 2005

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms______3 1. Introduction ______4 2. Summary of Issues & Recommendations by the PMA ______6 3.. Findings ______15 3.1. Summary of Note For The Records ______15 3.1.1. NFR Code No. J-5/January 2005 ______15 3.1.2. NFR Code No. G-5/January 2005 ______15 3.1.3. NFR Code No. J-6/February 2005______15 3.1.4. NFR Code No. G-6/February 2005 ______16 3.1.5. NFR Code No. J-7/March 2005 ______16 3.1.6. NFR Code No. G-7/March 2005 ______16 3.2. Case Studies ______16 3.2.1. Case Code No. J-4/March 2005 ______17 3.2.2. Case Code No. G-3/January 2005 ______17 3.2.3. Case Code No. G-5/February 2005 (an appreciative inquiry) ______17 3.3 Monthly/Quarterly Meeting Minutes ______17 4. Conclusions ______17 5. Annexes ______18 5.1. Annex 1 ______18 5.1.1. NFR Code No. J-5/ January 2005: Areas of Visit- Jamalpur ______19 5.2.2. NFR Code No. G-5/ January 2005: Area of visit: Gaibandha ______22 5.1.3. NFR Code No. J-6/ February 2005: Areas of Visit- Jamalpur ______27 5.1.4. NFR Code No. G-6/ February 2005: Area of visit- Gaibandha______29 5.1.5. NFR Code No. J-7/March 2005: Area of visit: Jamalpur district ______31 5.1.6. NFR Code No. G-7/ March 2005: Areas of Visit - Gaibandha District ______37 5.2. Annex 2 ______40 5.2..1 Case Study Code No.-J-4/March 2005: Children has come to immunization ______42 5.2..2 Case Study Code No.-G-3/January 05: A good start not always ends good ______43 5.2.3 Case Study Code No.-G-4/February 05: Making VDCs sustainable -views of key stakeholders ______45 5.3. Annex 3 ______49 5.3.1 Monthly/Quarterly Coordination Meeting Minutes, Code no. MCM J- 6/January 2005, Jamalpur______50

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

CAP Community Action Plan CDD Community Demand Driven CDM Community Development Manager CF Community Facilitator (of CSO) CG Community Group CHW Community Health Worker CIW Community Infrastructure Works CSO Community Support Organisation ESDO Eco-Social Development Organization FG Functional Group FGD Focus Group Discussion GC General Committee MCHCP Mother and Child Health Care Pilot Project HHs/hhs Households M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MEL Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning NFR Note For the Record PAST Project Appraisal and Supervision Team PM Process Monitoring PMA Process Monitoring Agency PMC Project Management Committee PO Participating Organisation READ Research Evaluation Associates for Development Ltd. SAP Social Assistance Program SDF Social Development Foundation SIPP Social Investment Program Project TOR Terms of Reference UCC Union Coordination Committee VDC Village Development Committee

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

1. Introduction This is the Process Monitoring Agency s (PMA) third Quarterly Report. It describes the main activities undertaken during the period January to March 2005 by the PMA under SIPP and is being submitted to the Social Development Foundation (SDF) both for its review and to take necessary actions based on the recommendations contained herein. The purpose and development of the process monitoring system within SIPP has been exhaustively described in previous documents produced by the PMA and its summary can be found in the introductory pages of the first Quarterly Report. The system was, as has been explained before, developed with the active participation of SDF, other SIPP agencies and community beneficiaries. During the period under review, the PMA has submitted reports, Notes For the Records (NFRs) and case studies to SDF. In addition, the PMA on a voluntary basis takes the minutes of the Monthly/ Quarterly Progress/ Coordination Meetings in the Districts and Dhaka and forwards these to SDF for onward circulation. Copies of all these documents are annexed to this report. The various activities so far performed by PMA during the 3rd quarter are shown below in Table 1. The PMA team visited a total of 58 villages, including fixed sample villages, in both Gaibandha and Jamalpur districts in order to develop NFRs and case studies. Six NFRs i.e. three for each district (under regular district wise monitoring for Gaibandha and Jamalpur districts) were prepared. Moreover, three case studies were prepared in this quarter. Out of three case studies, one focusses on the critical issue of VDC institulization and the two on the achievements of SIPP activities. Six Monthly Progress Meeting minutes, three minutes for each district for January, February and March 05 and a Quarterly Progress Review/ Coordination Meeting for October to December 04 quarter (held in January 05) were prepared. The PMA local team provided training on the Report Card methodology to the field workers of partner organizations (CSOs and POs) of both the districts. Six groups were formed and a total of 5 days were spent in each district for this training. The training covered the 13 critical indicators in the cards. Explanations were given on each of the indicators and how to train the VDCs on this monitiring system. Also discussed was the mechanisam of data recording, compilation and flow. Table 1: 3rd Quarter Activities Sl. no. Activities Actions taken/Particulars of Activities 1. 2nd Quarterly Report Prepared a Draft Quarterly Report for the period of Ocotber- December 04 and submitted to SDF 2. Field/Villages Visit A total of 27 villages (1st and 2nd year) of Jamalpur district and 31 villages in Gaibandha district were visited that covered both the fixed and random sample villages. 3. NFRs 6 NFRs were prepared based on critical process observations of SIPP during this quarter 4. Summary of the Prepared three summary matrixes on the basis of NFR where one NFRs matrix covers the output of onemonth s two NFRs. 5. Training Provided training on the Report Card methodology to the field staff of partner organizations namely CSO, PO (both 1st and 2nd year) in both districts 6. Case Studies Prepared four case studies. 7. Monthly/quarterly Attended the Monthly/ Quarterly Progress Meetings with SDF Progress Meeting and partner organizations of SIPP. 4

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Progress Meeting and partner organizations of SIPP. 8. Meeting Minutes Prepared seven meeting minutes and circulated to all concerned.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

2. Summary of Issues & Recommendations by the PMA

List of NFRs Issues and Recommendations made by PMA

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision NFR-J-5 (January 2005, Jamalpur) 131 Subproject implementation will be VDCs need further support for building Action has uncertain in the 1st year villages if their institutional capacity. been taken CSO is withdrawn In Jamailpur, the CSO workers were Capacity of VDCs has not been fully built. withdrawn from the first year villages VDCs need further support for building from 31 December 2004. Community their institutional capacity. contribution for the culvert sub- projects has not yet been fully collected. Many activities have not yet been completed in first year villages. As a result, completion of different sub-projects may be delayed further. 132 April Aide Memoire has not been Sharing of Aide Memoire will be Relevant shared with partners beneficial for the project portion of the It seems that Aide Memoire of IDA final report will PMA believes that Sharing of Aide Memoire Review Mission is not a confidential be shared will be beneficial for the project. Partner document (they shared key findings organizations feel that it would help them with the partners). Aide Memoire of in identifying their strengths and April 2004 has not been shared with weaknesses. the partners. 133 Poor planning in health component SDF should review partners work plan TA (H) is resulted in huge transaction costs critically in advance and feasibility of requested to and objective has not been achieved new ideas should be tested beforehand take necessary Health component of SIPP organized SDF should review partners workplan action and PRA training in 15 villages spending critically in advance and thus guide share the 15 days (1 day in each village). Only 3 partners to accomplish their tasks project VDC members from a village efficiently; experience attended in each training session. This SDF can share partners workplan with with others training could have been organized PMA in advance so that PMA can make its within 2/3 days with 15-22/23 comments in a timely manner; participants in each day saving time Effectiveness and feasibility of new and resources. As per opinion of HPO ideas should be tested on a limited scale & TAT, purpose of training has not prior to implementing this in a large scale. been achieved. Trained resource persons are not willing to practice the tools in their villages.

134 Repetition of PRA activity under If it is for triangulation purposes, different TA (H) is health component method can save time and resources advised to find out effective HPO & TAT facilitated different PRA If it is for sake of triangulation, it is not method in tools in a village. They also repeated necessary to organize full PRA session in consultation the same exercises in each para of the different places of a village. It is better to with CDM, same village after completing the conduct one PRA exercise rigorously for the PMA and village-wise PRA exercise. Reasons entire village and then share the findings Impact for repetition are not clear and it with the villagers at least in 3 different spots Evaluation caused high transaction costs. in the village. In each spot, the new 6

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision caused high transaction costs. in the village. In each spot, the new Consultant information or variation that may arrive may be added to the previous one. 135 Present process for selecting hard Village-wise selection (rather than Meeting with core poor may exclude deserving functional group-wise) is more Manager SAP, candidates appropriate. Seed capital recipients should PO and PMA is not be equal across the SIPP villages. The SIPP concept is to select hardcore held with one Village-wise selection of the hardcore poor not by functional group but month to poor for skill development training is more rather by village. Selecting equal review the practical. Other methods like voting among numbers of hardcore poor from each issue (PMA the hardcore poor may also apply. functional group may cause exclusion response: Not Number of hardcore poor and extent of of deserving candidates (if one held yet) hardship are not same among the SIPP considers the village as a whole). villages. So, seed capital should not be distributed among an equal number (32 in a village) of hardcore poor across over the SIPP villages. 136 Number of hardcore poor in a All hardcore poor should be taken care off Do village should not be pre-fixed under SAP The PO fixed the maximum number SDF should take necessary measures so that of hardcore poor in a village at 125 there would not be any limit in selecting households. Many hardcore poor hardcore poor under any SIPP villages in households have been excluded from future (2nd year villages). All hardcore poor the selection processes, where total should be addressed under SAP. number of hardcore poor in a village is more than 125. 137 False hope has been given for dowry Such practice should be strictly prohibited Agreed. free marriage False hope from any project team member A mother of bridegroom is convinced would create expectation of villagers. This to organize her ward s marriage may cause very detrimental effect to the without dowry with a hope that she project in future. All project team members would get cash/kind support from should be careful about this. the project. A front level staff of PO has given such a false hope to the villagers. NFR-G-5 (January 2005, Gaibandha) 138 PMC showed a bill for buying SDF should check the matter, if there is no PAST is asked tubewell maintenance tools but such budget, SDF should think to to ensure that practically that has not been bought buy/provide this certification of A specific budget provision of SDF should look into the issue whether final bill is Tk.321/per tube well for purchasing there was any budget for purchasing cautiously tools (and PMC received that amount repairing instruments. If not, than it is done and showed bills) has been observed important to create a provision for but PAST disagreed with such budgeting a small amount to purchase at provision. least 1-2 sets of tools under each VDC. If there was no such budget provision and thus no tools were purchased then it will raise a question how the small repairing works of the tube wells will be done by the users.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision 139 Beneficiaries have been selected PAST should cross check the beneficiary Necessary from same households for many list before installation of a tube well in action is taken tubewells future by PAST and PAST should cross check the It has been observed in many cases CSO beneficiary list before installation of a tube that tubewell beneficiaries are well in future. selected from same households. PAST should provide strong orientation Inclusion of duplicate name and to the VDC to be honest and sincere in physically unavailable person to preparing beneficiary list for a tube well increase the number of tube wells sub-project. users ultimately created tendency of making the tube well a personal one. 140 One or two households paid the CSO and PAST should ensure that all the Necessary total contribution for many users of a tube well are sharing the action is taken tubewells community contribution. by PAST and It has been observed in many cases CSO that one or two of the users paid the total share of the community contribution for tube-well subprojects. Other users who did not pay the contribution may lose their access right to use the tube-well in future. 141 More than 30% tubewells (out of 65 Common place fairly accessible to all users PMA and MEL surveyed) installed at the inner should be chosen in future Manager is courtyard asked to follow PMA conducted a survey on the 65 PMA recommends that a common place up tube-wells and found 22 tubewells fairly accessible to all users should be installed at the inner courtyard of the chosen for installation of a tube well from homestead. Installing a tube well in SIPP in future. inner courtyard of a household discourages the free and frequent access by other users. This also creates a scope for the owner of homestead to declare the tube well as his own property at a stage. 142 It was actually not paid to the PAST should ensure a transparent PAST and CSO laborers what shown in the Master payment process are asked to roll ensure it PAST should take the issue more seriously It has been observed in a road and follow up the payments make by PMCs subproject that the labourers were to labourers so that the labourers get their paid less than what was shown in the actual wages. SDF should take initiative to Master Roll. The labourers were paid make clear the role of PAST in this regard. at the rate of Tk.50 per day, but actually the rate was shown as Tk.65 in the Master Roll. PASTs said that they are not responsible to oversee the payment to the labourers, as the matter does not fall under a technical category. The same issue has been raised in the NFR G-2.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision 143 A market shade built without toilet CDD project should be flexible in revising Agreed. CSO facilities in spite of community appraisal in any stage and PAST are demand asked to take Flexibility in different stages is an important corrective In a first year village, a market shade characteristic of a CDD project. CAP/ Sub- action construction sub-project is almost project Appraisal can be further revised if completed without any toilet community demands so at a later stage and facilities. Local community it is found to be rationale and feasible. demanded for revising the sub project appraisal to adopt provision for toilet facilities. 144 In competent VDC President Community should be motivated to chose Proper a right leader and there should be motivational Role of VDC president is very opportunity to change an incompetent and conflict important. It has been found that a leader resolution VDC president is not aware about the Community people should be work should activities currently being motivated to select a leader who can really be undertaken implemented in his village under perform his duty properly. CSO should by CSOs SIPP. He was not even aware about keep an eye in this regard during formation the structure and functions of a VDC of VDCs. and his responsibility too as President There should be a constitution of VDCs of a VDC. mentioning provision for changing any office bearers i.e. impeachment and election. 145 A PMC member has kept money CSO should discourage such practice Agreed. CSOs collected from community need to do CSO should follow up the matter and can contribution in hand further insist on the Cashier to deposit the cash in motivational It has been observed that a PMC the bank account of PMC as earlier as work to member has kept money collected possible. CSO should also motivate other discourage this from community contribution in hand PMCs not to keep any amount as cash in practice rather depositing the money in the hand beyond provision. bank. Such practice may lead to misappropriation of funds. NFR-J-6 (February 2005, Jamalpur) 146 Quality of Functional Group (FG) is PO should reinforce to improve capacity of PMA will very poor, it may not be sustained in the Functional Groups. supply detailed future. list mentioning PO should reinforce on the FGs to hold the specific group Quality of Functional Groups (FG) is monthly meeting on a regular basis and to and name of very poor. Many leaders of the FGs take more initiatives to improve the VDC to SAP are unable to tell which group s/he capacity of the FGs. PO should gradually Manager for belongs to. Resolutions are not transfer it s responsibilities to the FGs recorded regularly. A concern has follow up. POs been raised in connection with the are asked to sustainability of these Functional gear up their Groups after phasing out of the PO. activities. 147 Same mistakes took place in 2nd year CSO should pay more effort in this regard. SDF has villages regarding road subprojects decided that Learning of CSO in the first year was not in private lands. road works properly internalized/addressed. This may would be Road sub-project under SIPP is be due to that at the later stage, problem undertaken preferred on the public/ common would be encountered by PAST and overall only on lands lands. Based on the bitter experience project interest was undermined. SDF 9

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision lands. Based on the bitter experience project interest was undermined. SDF which are in 1st year, it has been decided that in should create a congenial atmosphere to voluntarily case of private land, prior consent raise SIPP team spirit in a coordinated donated. and acquisition of required land manner. CSO should pay more effort in this should be obtained and a copy of the regard. land transfer contract should be provided with the application form of the sub project. But the same mistakes took place in case of many 2nd year villages caused delay of implementation. 148 Soil from nearby burrow pits and CSO should resolve such issue at the PASTs/CSOs fallow ponds are being used for planning stage. are asked to repairing works of roads. This may consider this This issue should have been resolved cause damage of roads in near issue while during planning stage. During needs future. measurement is assessment/ PRA exercise, STEPS (socio- done. Repairing work of road subprojects in economic, technical, environmental, many 1st year villages is facing political and sustainability) analysis can be problem. Adjacent landowners are done to resolve such issues in advance. SIPP not willing to give soil from their can use PAPD (Participatory Action Plan lands. Collecting soil from distant Development) method in this regard. places incurs a higher cost. Presently, repairing works have been ongoing by collecting soil from nearby bburrow pits and fallow ponds, which may cause further damage of roads in near future. 149 VDC/PMC did not deposit CSO should follow up the issue and assist CSO are asked community contribution in the bank. VDC to open bank account as early as to look in to possible and to deposit the money in this this matter VDC/PMC did not deposit bank account. closely. community contribution in the bank. In few cases, bank account has not SDF will been opened yet. Villagers are not engage Internal happy with this and many villagers Auditor to refused to pay rest of their follow it up. contribution. NFR-G-6 (February 2005, Gaibandha) 150 Few members have paid almost the CSO should ensure participation of at Agreed. whole amount of contribution. This least 50% of HHs and PAST should protect CSOs are asked may hamper sense of ownership (6 misappropriation of project money. executive members of VDC and to take Community contribution should be PMC have paid Tk.10,000 each as concerted collected from at least 50% households of a community contribution). efforts to SIPP village. CSO and PAST should encourage It has been reported that in few develop and follow an appropriate beneficiaries to villages, only GC members have paid mechanism against any misappropriation of participate in almost the whole amount of project resources. the community contribution. This may contribution of hamper community ownership sub-project. feelings- an important principle of SIPP. In one village, it has been 10

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision reported that 6 executive members of VDC and PMC have paid Tk.10,000 each as community contribution. This is unusual. 151 Institutionalization process of VDCs CSO should pay more effort in CSOs are asked is found weak in many villages. institutionalizing the VDCs. to take There are lack of regular meetings necessary and record keeping. action. 152 A total of 46 ponds are located SDF should look at the matter whether As part of beside 11 ongoing road subprojects implementation of these subprojects are protection of in 2 villages. Roads are being worthwhile. the road, Binna implemented without reinforcement (i) It is expected that PAST would develop grass can be measures susceptible to landslide. technically sound design for an planted (experienced in Y-1, NFR-5) infrastructural sub-project in future. (ii) alongside the Roads beside a pond are the most PAST should review the previous road sub- road. In this susceptible to damage/ landslide in projects, which are susceptible to damage regard PMA monsoon. First year s experience and should come up with expressed supports the assumption (NFR-5). It recommendations. willingness to has been observed in 2 villages that provide implementation of 11 road training on subprojects is ongoing. There are 46 Binna nursery ponds located beside the roads. Extra operation free reinforcement measures are found of cost. absent. 153 A big difference has been found PAST should inform villagers why this This has between appraised/billed amount happened and should take necessary already been and paid amount for some tubewell measure to avoid such incident in future. solved. subprojects. PAST should look into the matter and In case of Chikney village under clarify to the villagers about the policy and Jamalpur Union of Sadullapur provision of appraisal & billing and their Upazila, PMC 1 & 2 submitted two subsequent revisions. (ii) PAST shall final bills of tube well sub-projects, provide necessary orientation to the PMC which were Tk.12,064 and Tk. 10,162 and VDC about the importance of accurate respectively. But the actual payment billing. was reduced significantly and finally they were paid Tk. 3,127 and Tk.3,346 respectively. Such difference also observed in case of Khordo Rosulpur VDC where the PMC submitted a final bill of Tk.15,264 for a road sub- project but the amount was reduced remarkably and only Tk.6,482 has been paid. The villagers wanted to know how the payment reduced by 60-75%. NFR-J-7 (March 2005, Jamalpur) 154 Poor quality of PRA training under Improve the quality of training HPO/TAT 3 VDC members from each of the The process was not tested prior to HPO/TAT villages received PRA implemenatation. A professional PRA training (TOT) with an expectation expert should be deployed to test and 11

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision that the VDC members will facilitate ensure quality of training. Interested and same training to their respective capable VDC members should be selected villagers. Meanwhile, 5 such trainings for this TOT. have been conducted (by the trained VDC members) and it is found that the quality of training is very poor and most of the VDC level trainers could not remember the contents and objective of the training. Many members told that they do not have enough time for providing training. 155 Only 5 trainings have been Realistic plan should be made and priority conducted out of planned 24 of activity should be spelled out. trainings in 2 HPO/TAT villages PRA session is an important activity under It has been planned that 12 PRA MCHC component of SIPP. A doable plan training would be conducted each should be adopted giving proper attention quarter in each village. It has been to the important activities. found that only a total of 5 trainings have been conducted in the 2 CHW should ensure proper documentation HPO/TAT villages during January- of PRA exercises. March 05 quarter.

Proper documentation of PRA sessions is found absent. 156 A road subproject is susceptible to CSO should comply with the village river erosion selection criterion in future and SDF should be careful in implementing As per SIPP village selection criterion, infrastructural work in this village it has been suggested that the villages susceptible to river erosion should not to be included in the project. Jhalor char village in Bahadurabad union of Dewanganj upazila is a village at high risk of river erosion and has been included under SIPP. A road has been completed very close to Balujhuri river and is under threat of river erosion in the coming monsoon. 157 Implementation of culvert is delayed Number of shutters should be increased. due to lack of adequate number of CSO and PAST are recommended to make shutters. Community contribution realistic plan and should pay more effort to collection and making shutters took comply with the plan. unjustified time. Time between receiving 1st installment and starting culvert making took 2.5 months. (It is recommended to go through the main NFR i.e. NFR J-7). 158 PAST is requesting for waiver of SDF should provide their decision in this testing quality of compaction of regard. earthen roads by LGED. 159 Repetition of work between CSO and PO should use the CSO developed list and

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision PO in preparing hardcore poor list can validate the list. CSO did series of PRA exercises in the Repetition of PRA exercises should be 2nd year villages including wealth avoided to minimize the transaction cost. ranking. CSO made a list of hardcore poor which is supposed to be used by PO. But it is found that PO is doing fresh PRA exercises to list out hardcore poor rather than validating the CSO list. 160 1st year VDCs did not review CAPs / CSO should expedite CAP review process. did not make annual action plan for SDF should take clear decision regarding year 2 in many villages. It should be UCC issue. determined whether UCCs would review VDC s CAPs. 161 Fund for culvert project is not SDF should take necessary measures in this managed in a proper way. regard. A part of Gopinathpur village is added with Hatubhanga village. Slope of some roads are not adequate and may cause damages. Poor women group is losing in compaction work due to lack of experience, they have quoted lower price in the bidding. (It is recommended to go through the other observations of main NFR J-7) NFR-G-7 (March 2005, Gaibandha) 162 Misleading information provided by PO should arrange a mass gathering and PO in the 2nd year villages created disseminate the right messages. frustration among the hardcore poor, VDC and PMC. PO staff said in a village that out of 136 hardcore poor, only 40 would get training and 32 would get seed money. But he did not say that most of the hardcore poor would get other trainings and 40 would get skill development training in addition. Negative approach of information dissemination created frustration among the hardcore poor, VDC and PMC, which is damaging other activities of SIPP. 163 Few hardcore poor excluded from Excluded HHs should be included in the the list in a village list. Daxin Kanchibari village has a total of 400 households where 35 HHs have been excluded from the HH list. Out

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Sl Issues/Topics/Recommendations Action required/ Remarks Decision of this 35 HHs, about 20 HHs are found hardcore poor. 164 Sub-project proposals have been This seems to be a planning fault of PAST. prepared and submitted about 15-30 SDF should provide necessary support and days back but PAST has not directions to the PAST as an interim appraised yet in many villages. measure. And should review the previous plans to find out future directions to make realistic plan in future. 165 Meeting minutes are not recorded in a CSO should take necessary measures in this timely manner in some 2nd year regard. villages. 166 Few roads are susceptible to damage PAST should implement the road during in next monsoon. the time when lands are free from crops. Soil for road is scarce during the period when crops are in the field. Alternatively, SIPP roads are being made collecting soil from few points beside the roads. These points are turned into deep ditches and part of the roads besides the ditches are susceptible to damage during monsoon rain.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

3.. Findings

3.1. Summary of Note For The Records From January to March 05, a total of 6 Notes For The Records (NFRs) have been produced by the PMA. NFRs are prepared on the basis of FGDs and observations of critical processes on the selected issues through field visits by the PMA and are structured into three major heads: Process observation Process issues arising Process recommendation. The summary of all the 6 NFRs is presented below, while the detailed descriptions are presented in Annex-1. The key process issues identified and the associated recommendations have been presented in the preceding summary table.

3.1.1. NFR Code No. J-5/January 2005 This is a regular district wise monthly monitoring in Jamalpur district. NFR J-5 highlighted issues relating to CSO withdrawal from older villages, World Bank s Aide Memoire, PRA training of VDC members, PRA exercises and their repetition, hardcore poor and their skill development training, fixation of the number of hardcore poor, and message dissemination across the villagers. Key observations and recommendations of the NFR J-5 were: CSO should provide support further to VDC for improving its capacity, sharing of aide memoire would be beneficial for the partners, repetition of activities by the different partnes should be avoided, selection of hardcore poor should follow a standard and acceptable method, the SAP activities should cover all hardcore poor of a selected village, and finally that care should be taken in information dissemination.

3.1.2. NFR Code No. G-5/January 2005 NFR G-5 is prepared as a regular part of process monitoring activities that explored various issues which are: no instruments purchased for repairing and maintenance of tube-wells, beneficiaries selection for tube-well sub-projects, one or two of the users paying the total share of the community contribution, installation of tube-wells inside one s home, difference between master roll and the amount actually paid, a market-shade sub-prpoject without toilet facilities, incompetent VDC president, and cash being kept in hand. Key recommendations on the basis of mentioned observations in the NFR G5 were: SDF should review whether there is any budget for purchasing the repairing or maintenance tools for tubewell sub-projects, beneficiary list has to be checked rigorously by PAST before appraising/ installation of tubewells, contributions should be collected from all tube-well beneficiaries, common sites which are accessible to all users should be chosen and the CSO should more pro-active regarding community contribution.

3.1.3. NFR Code No. J-6/February 2005 This is a regular district wise monthly monitoring in Jamalpur district. NFR J-6 reported on capacity building of functional groups, undertaking of road sub-project proposal without prior consent of the private landowners, road repairng works may face difficulties due to not having adequate land for soil collection and community contribution being kept in the

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report form of cash instead of being dpostied in the bank. Key observations and recommendations of the NFR J-6 were: PO should strengthen the functional groups to maintain the monthly meeting regularly and needs to take more initiatives to improve their capacities, CSO should take more care regarding earth collection, extensive and valuable frequent discussions has to be needed regarding private land contribution and CSO should take more care on cash and bank account opening.

3.1.4. NFR Code No. G-6/February 2005 This is a regular district wise monthly monitoring in Gaibandha district. NFR G-6 reported that amount of community contribution appears too big for some poor households, VDC monthly meeting is becoming irregular, roads constructed without protection fence beside the ponds will get damage quickly and differences observed between final bill and actual payment. Key observations and recommendations of the NFR G-6 were: CSO should ensure the participation of at least 50% hhs in community contribution and PAST should prevent misappropriation of project money, pay more effort to maintain regular meetings i.e., to institutionalize the VDCs, PAST should create understanding about the drawbacks of having no protection of roads besides pond and should encourage palasiding.

3.1.5. NFR Code No. J-7/March 2005

This is a regular district monthly monitoring in Jamalpur district. NFR J-7 reported on poor quality of training by HPO/ TAT, slow pace of progress of HPO/ TAT, village selection did not follow criterion and poor plan of PAST in implementing culverts. Key observations and recommendations of the NFR J-7 were: HPO/ TAT should provide quality training, HPO/ TAT should comply with their workplan, infrastructural implementation should not be taking place in villages susceptible to river erosion and PAST should plan such a way so that implementation of sub-projects should be completed in a timely manner.

3.1.6. NFR Code No. G-7/March 2005

This is a regular monthly monitoring in Gaibandha district. NFR G-7 reported on dissemination of misleading information by PO, exclusion of hardcore poor in a village list, unacceptable delay in CIW implementation by PAST, irregular minutes keeping of VDCs and issues regarding earth collection. Key observation and recommendations of the NFR G-7 were: PO should resolve the information gap in a village for smooth operation of SIPP activities, excluded hardcore poor should be included in the village list and CSO should take initiative in this regard, PAST should be proactive in implementing the sub-projects, CSO should pay more attention and effort to VDC meetings and PAST should try to implement the road sub-project during the time when lands are free of crops.

3.2. Case Studies SIPP is now close to end it s second year of implementation. Meanwhile various activities, relating to both hardware and software, have been implemented in the project areas by the partners with active support from SDF. The case study is one of the mechanisms to capture best practices, lessons learned, failures and achievements of the project beneficiaries and the subsequent impacts of the project activities on their livelihood, etc. Such notable issues that were observed in the project areas were documented in the form of case studies and are

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report described in detail in Annex 2 of this report. In short, the substance of the case studies is presented below:

3.2.1. Case Code No. J-4/March 2005 The Participation Organization (PO) has been working on various advocacy issues under SAP activities and achieved various successes. Immunization is one of the key tasks in the advocacy program. Though some villagers had apprehensions about immunization, a proper campaign broke all barriers. Nanda Rani Nama Das of a traditional fisher community was unimmunized till 10 months of age. A proper initiative of the Social Worker of PO in this regard has changed the barrier into a success story and made it exemplary for all. Now, all villagers are committed to give complete dozes to immunize their children.

3.2.2. Case Code No. G-3/January 2005

This VDC of Chickney village under Jamalpur Union of Sadullapur Upazila, Gaibandha, planned a good initiative towards 100% sanitation under SAP of SIPP. To achieve this, they made a promising start and held a workshop in their village with the help of the Participating Organization on how to prepare low cost sanitary latrines. Apart from this, the VDC organized a literacy centre for females, a savings program has also been started among the 120 villagers and they took an initiative themselves to establish a market shade. But after initial enthusiasm and activity, poor progress was found. The PMA team identified a set of reasons why most of the villagers lost their interest resulting in delays to bring the village under total sanitation status. A few recommendations has been made in the case study (annex 5.2.2).

3.2.3. Case Code No. G-5/February 2005 (an appreciative inquiry)

Village Development Committee (VDC) is a concept under SIPP to develop grassroots institutions in the community to play active roles in village development. An appreciative inquiry has been undertaken by the PMA Gaibandha team to identify the sustainability factors as per opinion of community and partner organizations. It has been revealed by the inquiry that democratic practices, accountability, transparency, capacity of VDC members and leadership are the key aspects towards institutionalization process of the VDCs. (annex 5.2.3).

3.3 Monthly/Quarterly Meeting Minutes

SDF meets regularly with partner organizations on monthly/quarterly basis to review the latters last month s/ quarter s performance/ progress and next month s/ quarter s work plans. Meeting minutes is an important document where discussions, decisions and follow up of the monthly meetings are being documented. The documentation of regular monthly meetings was started in August 04 and for quarterly meetings from October 04. Six minutes of three monthly meeting (three per district) and a quarterly meeting minutes have been produced during the period under review and have been annexed n this report.

4. Conclusions

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

The Process Monitoring Agency monitors key implementation processes within SIPP. This covers the area of activities and processes of all the partner organizations. The PMA has observed that many recommendations it has made are being well-taken and implemented, while others are under consideration of SDF. The PMA strongly believes that its recommendations for the Quarter in question, and in future, will expedite the implementation process and effectiviness of SIPP.

5. Annexes

5.1. Annex 1

NOTE FOR THE RECORD

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

5.1.1. NFR Code No. J-5/ January 2005: Areas of Visit- Jamalpur

Introduction: Jamalpur PMA team has prepared this NFR based on their field visit to different SIPP villages during January 2005. It describes the key findings of the PMA team from their field observations and the recommendations they have for the concerned partners to mitigate the arising issues. Apart from field visit, the Jamalpur PMA team also participated in the District Coordination and Quarterly Coordination Meeting in January 05 and attended in a training conducted by Julian Barr in SDF office, Dhaka.

1. Possible extension of CSO staff in the 1st year villages up to June 05

Process observations: In Jamailpur, the CSO workers have been withdrawn from the first year villages from 31 December 2004. Community contribution for the culvert sub-projects is not yet fully collected. Many activities that were left over in first year villages viz. to link the VDCs with the local resource institutions to carry out their self-initiated development activities, to review the CAPs, etc. are unsupervised1.

Process issues arising: Since PAST has limited experience and/or has no responsibility for assisting VDCs in collecting community contribution, it may further delay the collection of community contribution from the 1st year villagers because of the absence of CSO. As a result, completion of different sub-projects may be delayed further in these villages during second year.

Process recommendations: In a Quarterly Coordination Meeting (16 January 2005), the PMA team came to know that the CSO staff might stay in these 1st villages up to June 05. The PMA is fully agreed to this decision and recommends to effect the decision positively because it will be helpful in collecting unpaid community contribution and strengthening and linking the VDCs with the local service/resources institutions. In its Aide Memoire of January, 2005 the World Bank also recommended that SDF should extend the services of CSOs to assess the interest of the VDCs to enhance their capacity and assist those VDCs to prepare sub-project proposal for technical assistance and request funding from SDF to acquire the services of competent organizations/individuals to help VDCs articulate their vision and prepare a road map for at least a three year time-frame. 2

2. Sharing World Bank s Aide Memoire with the partner organizations

Process observations: The World Bank team, who paid a visit to the SIPP project in April 2004, made a number of suggestions and recommendations about the project and its partners in their Aide Memoire . About nine months have been passed, but the partners at the field level (CSO, PO and PAST) did not receive a copy of Aide Memoire and showed their ignorance about any formal sharing of recommendations/ suggestions.

Process issues arising: A curiosity has been observed among the partner organizations to know in specific what suggestions and recommendations the World Bank Team made in their Aide Memoire . Partner organizations feel that it would help them in identifying their

1 PAST has launched their 2nd year activities but they did not complete 1st year s activities yet. Monitoring and supervision of both years activities may hamper quality of work. 2 See SIPP Aide Memoire by IDA Implementation Review Mission: December 28, 2004 to January 9, 2005 Section 5.2 19

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report strengths and weaknesses in performing their responsibilities and improve the weak areas through taking necessary initiatives.

Process recommendations: SDF should share the relevant part of the Aide Memoire with the partner organizations as early as possible.

3. HPO and TAT providing PRA training to the VDC members

Process observations: Mother and Child Health Piloting (MCHP) component of SIPP is being implemented in 15 villages of Hativanga & Bahadurabad union. Training on PRA tools (Health Hazard chart, Mobility map, Seasonal Calendar, Venn diagram) was organized on 15 separate days for the 15 villages. Only 3 VDC members from a village attended in each training session. HPO & TAT3 jointly provided the training with an assumption that the VDC members would practice this in their respective villages at a later stage.

Process issues arising: i) This training could have been organized over 2/3 days with 15- 22/23 participants attending each day and would have been more effective also saving time and resources; ii) As per opinion of HPO & TAT, purpose of training has not been achieved. Trained resource persons are not willing to practice the tools in their villages.

Process recommendations: i) SDF should review partners work plan critically in advance and can guide partners to accomplish their tasks efficiently; ii) SDF can share partners work plan with PMA in advance so that PMA can make its comments in a timely manner; iii) Effectiveness and feasibility of new ideas should be tested on a limited scale prior to implementing this on a large scale.

4. Conducting village-wise PRA exercise and then repeating the same exercise para-wise

Process observations: HPO & TAT facilitated different PRA tools in a village. They also repeated the same exercises in each para of the same village after completing the village-wise PRA exercise.

Process issues arising: A question arose from VDC members and villagers for repeating PRA exercise in each para after conducting the same for the entire village. They wanted to know about significant differences of findings between village and paras. The HPO and TAT facilitators could not give any satisfactory answer to this question. They only mentioned that the tools must be exercised repeatedly 3 times in three different parts or para of a village after completing the village-wise PRA first.

Process recommendations: If it is for sake of triangulation, it is not necessary to organize full PRA session in different places of a village. It is better to conduct one PRA exercise rigorously for the entire village and then share the findings with the villagers at least in 3 different spots in the village. In each spot, the new information or variation that is arrived at may be added to the previous one, rather than conducting the whole exercise from very beginning. Only the health hazard mapping exercise can be repeated afresh in different parts or para of the village.

3 HPO is conducting the sessions and TAT is maintaining the quality ofPRA activities. 20

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

5. How the hardcore poor will be selected for the skill development training

Process observations: Identification of hardcore poor in SIPP villages is an important task. Participating Organization has got the list of hardcore poor from CSO and verified it. Different numbers of functional groups in different sizes are made on the basis of the number of hardcore poor of a respective village. As per strategy of SDF, about 40 hardcore poor would get skill training as per their need from a village. Out of total trainees, about 80% would get seed capital. Practice of PO in selecting 40 hardcore poor is as follows: If a village has 4 functional groups, 10 hardcore poor are selected from each group which makes 40 hardcore poor in number for giving skill development training. The selection process is based on functional group not on village.

Process issues arising: The SIPP concept is to select hardcore poor not by functional group rather by village. Selecting equal numbers of hardcore poor from each functional group may cause exclusion of deserving candidates (looking at the village as a whole). According to PO and the villagers, selection of hardcore poor for skill development training by functional group approach may exclude the relatively hardcore poor from the selection. For example, say in the functional group A (usually each groups consists of 25 hardcore poor members), there are 15 relatively hardcore poor; and in the functional group B, there are 7 relatively hardcore poor; and the hardcore poor in the group A are more vulnerable than the group B. According to functional group approach, 10 hardcore poor would be selected from each group that means 5 deserving candidates from Group A are to be excluded.

Process recommendations: i) It appears that the village-wise selection of the targeted number of hardcore poor for skill development training is more practical. Other methods like voting4 among the hardcore poor may also apply here for selecting hardcore poor for skill development training. This method can help PO in reducing undue pressure5 of VDCs/ other community members. ii) Number of hardcore poor and extent of hardship are not same over the SIPP villages. So, seed capital should not be distributed in equal numbers (32 hardcore poor in a village) across the SIPP villages.

6. Number of hardcore poor households serve by the PO under SAP may be increased

Process observations: The Participating Organization fixed the maximum number of hardcore poor in a village (125). Many hardcore poor households have been excluded from the selection processes, where total number of hardcore poor in a village is more than 125. All SIPP villages of Chikajani Union have more than 125 hardcore poor households.

Process issues arising: The team leader of PO informed that the Project Proposal of DAM was developed considering a hypothetical number of hardcore poor in a village i.e. 125. Budget of PO has been made on that basis. But this logic is redundant as majority of the client villages (1st year villages under PO) have lesser number of hardcore poor compared to 125. In that case, PO can go for higher number in some villages and can maintain their estimated plan. There is no such instruction cited in OM regarding fixing up a maximum number of hardcore poor in a SIPP village.

4 Voting system among hardcore poor can be adopted with the assistance of VDC members. Here, one hardcore poor can vote for 5-10 most deserving hardcore poor except voting for him/herself. 5 VDC members sometimes advocate for some persons. 21

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Process recommendations: SDF should take necessary measures so that there would not be any limit in selecting hardcore poor under any SIPP villages in future (2nd year villages). All hardcore poor should be taken care of under SAP.

7. Field workers of PO are not careful in disseminating development messages

Process observations: Through awareness program on Rights and Laws , Participating Organization disseminates the messages to villagers on family law, dowry free marriage, violence against women, etc. Ms. Aklima Khatun, wife of Kush Mahmud of Laxmirchar Dakshin para village under Laxmirchar union was inspired by the messages and settled marriage of her son without dowry. Aklima was explaining that she would never take any dowry from the bride s family, because the concerned PO officials told her that she would get some financial support from the project if she arrange a dowry free marriage for her son. PMA shared this issue with Mr. Md. Hasmot Ali, S/O Md. Hossain Ali and few other functional group members who attended the legal clinic session. A common expectation among the villagers has been observed that the parent of a bridegroom would get some financial support or employment opportunities from the project if they go for dowry-free marriage.

Process issues arising: Ms. Aklima Khatun is now waiting for the financial support from the project. PO project coordinator said that they do not have any scope for providing any financial or other support for dowry free marriage. Their responsibility is to disseminate the messages against dowry to the villagers. After analysis, it seems that the PO, i.e., its field worker was not careful in disseminating proper messages. As a result such an unexpected situation and false dream has been created among the villagers.

Process recommendations: PO must be more watchful during message dissemination by its field workers to the villagers. It should provide a strong orientation to its field workers not to fabricate or give extra color to the messages they disseminate to the villagers.

~/~

5.2.2. NFR Code No. G-5/ January 2005: Area of visit: Gaibandha

Introduction: As part of SIPP process monitoring, the Gaibandha PMA team visited 8 villages (4 first-year and 4 second-year villages) during January 2005. While visiting the villages, the PMA team observed various activities related to PMC formation and held discussions with villagers, hardcore poor and VDC executive committees to know about progress of other activities in the villages. As usual, the PMA team shared the field observations with the PAST, PO and CSO through focus group discussions reiterating the importance of the partner organizations taking action on some of the observed issues. PMA participated in the District coordination and Quarterly Coordination Meeting, conducted mapping to identify process variation between the years with the partner organizations and attended a two-day long process monitoring training conducted by Julian Barr this month. This NFR describes the key findings from process observations made by the PMA team during January 2005. It is noted that key findings of the NFR have been shared in the Monthly Coordination Meeting.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

1. No instruments purchased for repairing and maintenance of tube wells

Process observations: In Hatbamni and Monohorpur VDCs of Kamarpara and Jamalpur Unions under Sadullapur Upazila, a total of 41 and 10 tube wells were installed respectively from the SIPP. In these sub-projects there was a specific budget provision amounting to Tk.321/tube well to purchase repairing tools/instruments. Accordingly, an equivalent amount of Taka was paid to the PMCs against the bills they submitted for purchasing the tools. But in reality, PMCs and users community failed to show the tools for these 51 tube wells. PMA team shared the issue with the PAST. PAST said that there was no such budget provision prepared separately for purchasing tools.

Process issues arising: a) The first issue that arises here is the difference of opinion between budget provision and statement of PAST. It has been observed that there is a specific budget provision of Tk.321/per tube well for purchasing tools (and PMC received that amount and showed bills) but PAST disagreed with the existence of such a provision. b) If there was no such budget provision and thus no tools were purchased, then it raises the question how the small repairing works of the tube wells will be done by the users. Usually a set of repairing instruments is required for each tube well for day-to-day maintenance works.

Process recommendations: SDF should look into the issue and see if there was any line item budget for purchasing repairing instruments. If not than it is important to create a provision for budgeting a small amount to purchase at least 1-2 sets of tools under each VDC.

2. Beneficiary selection for tube well sub-projects is not occurring going properly

Process observations: Selection of tube well beneficiaries was not undetaken properly under PMC 1 in Uttar Hatbamni village under Kamarpara Union of Sadullapur Upazila. For instance, Abdul Jalil (owner of tube well) and his 3 sons were enlisted as beneficiaries from the same household. This was also observed in case of tube well showed against the name of Nurul Islam. Where one college going son and one married daughter of Abdul Bari who is living in another village were shown as beneficiaries of the tube well sanctioned in the name of Abdul Bari. In another case, both the husband and wife were enlisted as beneficiaries for the tube well shown against the names of Mizanur Rahman and Joynal Miah. The name of the same person was also found being used as beneficiary in case of tube wells approved both in the name of Anser Ali and Chan Miah. In this case, the name of Mozid Miah (father of Chan Miah) has been shown as a user of both these two tube wells. When the issue was brought to the notice of the CSO, it mentioned time constraints as the reason why it did not cross check the beneficiary lists. The CSO also stated that it is the VDC which is the body responsible for cross checking the list of tube well users.

Process issues arising: The beneficiary selection process of SIPP was not followed properly in many cases. Inclusion of duplicate name and physically unavailable persons to inflate the number of tube wells users artificially ultimately creates the tendency by some to hijack the use of the tube wells for only one or a few households. This issue has also been highlighted in the Aide Memoire of the recently concluded World Bank Mission wherein it was noted that there could be a potential risk of elite capture for a number of tube well sub-projects as

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report the tube wells were found to be located within the premises of influential members of the PMCs and had less than the determined number of households per tubewell. 6

Process recommendations: i) PAST should cross check the beneficiary list before installation of a tube well in future, and ii) PAST should provide strong orientation to the VDC to be honest and sincere in preparing beneficiary list for a tube well sub-project.

3. One or two of the users paying the total share of the community contribution

Process observations: A practice of showing all the users name in the collection register but in reality paying the total share of the community contribution by one or two persons has been observed in case of several tube well sub-projects. For instance, the community contribution of a tube well installed in the Uttar Hatbamni village under Kamarpara Union of Sadullapur Upazila was shown as collected from all the 7 user households. But in reality only one person, Mr. Rupon, son of Wahab Miah, paid the total contribution. The Same thing also observed in the case of another tube well (Mr. Nurul Islam son of Nasra Bepari). Here the community contribution was shown as collected from all the 7 user households but actually the total amount was paid by 2 of them. Sadatun Bari son of Ismail Hossain also paid the total amount of the community contribution for a tube well installed in his village Uttar Rajibpur under Dhopadanga Union of Sundargonj Upazila. But in the collection register, the amount was shown as collected from the 6 users households. Another tube well installed in Monohorpur village under Jamalpur Union of Sadullapur Upazila, the community contribution was shown as collected from 8 user households, but the fact is that the total contribution was paid by Shahidul, son of Mr. Samsul Haque Mondol. When the PMA team drew the attention of PAST on this issue, it replied that the CSO was responsible for it. But according to CSO, it is the PAST s responsibility to check the list of users while appraising a sub-project proposal and make sure that the list is genuine and all the users paid the community contribution proportionately.

Process issues arising: The user household which paid the total community contribution may exercise more power and ownership over the resource, i.e., tube well, whereby the other users who did not pay the contribution may lose their right to use the tube-well in future. This practise also leads to weakening of both community cohesion and shared sense of ownership of development efforts.

Process recommendations: CSO and PAST should ensure that all the users of a tube well are sharing the community contribution. This was also recommended in the recent World Bank Aide Memoire.7

4. Installation of tube wells inside one s home yard limits the frequent access of other users

Process observations: A survey conducted by the PMA team shows that out of 65 tube wells installed under SIPP in Uttar Hatbamni, Ramdakua and Uttar Rajibpur villages, 22 were installed in the inner courtyard of the households in the name of whom the tube wells were

6 See SIPP Aide Memoire by IDA Implementation Review Mission: December 28, 2004 to January 9, 2005 Annex 1 7 ditto 24

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report approved. Usually 5 9 households were shown as users of each tube well. But the places where the 22 tube wells were installed are limiting the frequent access of other users.

Table 1: Survey on location of 65 tube wells installed from SIPP VDC/village name (Union/Upazila) Tube well installed: Total Inner Outer courtyard courtyard Uttar Hatbamni (Kamarpara, 17 24 41 Sadullapur) Ramdakua, Belka, Sundargonj 3 3 6 Uttar Rajibpur (Dhopadanga) 1 7 8 Monohorpur (Jamalpur, Sadullapur) 1 9 10 Total 22 43 65

Process issues arising: Installing a tube well in such a location i.e., inside courtyard of a household discourages the free and frequent access by other users. This also creates a scope for the owner of homestead to declare the tube well as his own property at a later stage.

Process recommendations: PAST should invest more time on site selection for installation of tube wells. It should ensure that no tube well is installed in the inner courtyard of one s homestead. A common place fairly accessible to all users should be chosen for installation of a tube well from SIPP.

5. Difference between Master Roll and the amount actually paid to the laborers in a road sub-project.

Process observations: A road sub-project is in progress in a first year village called Sandiapur under Rosulpur Union of Sadullapur Upazila. It came to the attention of the PMA team that in this sub-project the labourers were being paid less than what was shown in the Master Roll. The labourers were paid at the rate of Tk.50 per day, but actually the rate was shown Tk.65 in the Master Roll for both male and female labourers. When the matter was shared with the PMC members, they confirmed it saying that a part of amount from wage cost has been saved to meet the cost of Tiffin or Refreshment they provided to the labourers. The PAST s response on this issue shows that it is not responsible to oversee the payment to the labourers, as the matter is not one of a technical nature. It can be mentioned here that PMA team reported on the same issue in the NFR G2.

Process issues arising: Concerned community stakeholders raised questions in favour of labourers; why they were paid less than what was shown in the Master Roll. Labourers are also doubtful whether Tk.15 deducted from each of them was used for the Tiffin or not. Whatever the fact, labourers are more interested to get the total amount as shown in the Master Roll. If needed, they want to arrange their Tiffin by themselves. In fact the issue raised a question challenging the transparency and credibility of the PMC.

Process recommendations: All PMCs should follow the directives approved by SDF regarding payment to the labourers. PAST should take the issue more seriously and follow up the payments make by PMCs to labourers so that the labourers get their actual wages. SDF should take initiative to make clear the role of PAST in this regard.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

6. A market- shade sub-project constructed without toilet facilities

Process observations: In a first year village visited by the PMA team, a market shade construction sub-project is almost completed without any toilet facilities.

Process issues arising: Lack of public toilet will become a severe problem for this market when it will be opened for the use of common people. Absence of toilet facilities will deteriorate the sanitation and hygiene status of the market. Local community demanded to create such facilities in the market shade at a later stage. (AI: When did the local community demand the toilet? In the beginning or at a later stage?)

Process recommendations: Flexibility in different stages is an important aspect of a CDD project. CAP/ Sub-project Appraisal can be further revised if community demanded it at the later stage and found enough rationale and feasible. In future, provision for a public toilet should be kept in the proposal of market-shade construction sub-project.

7. Incompetent VDC President

Process observations: During field visit, the PMA team went to discuss with Hamed Ali, the President of Thakurer Ghat VDC under Chaporhati Union of Sundargonj Upazila, about the development activities undertaken in his village. But they found him not at all aware about the activities currently being implemented in his village under SIPP. Even he was not aware about the structure and functions of a VDC and his responsibility too as President of a VDC.

Process issues arising: If such a person like Hamed Ali is selected as President of a VDC, then the entire development process of a village is bound to become challenging. It may happen that no policy procedures are maintained by the PMCs in sub-project implementation as the President himself is ignorant of those or the dynamism and spirit in the VDC may be lost as no such self-driven initiatives come from the President.

Process recommendations: President is the top most vital position in a VDC. Whole growth and inspiration of a VDC depends on the personal capability and spirit of the President. If he is weak in leadership, then the performance of VDC will fall down. Therefore, it is always recommended that the VDC selects a dynamic, self-driven and intelligent person as its VDC President. CSO, PO and PAST, all should pay more attention to the selection of VDC President. Specific recommendations of PMA in this regard are a) Community people are to be motivated to select a leader who can really perform his duty properly. CSO should keep an eye in this regard during formation of VDCs. b) There should be a constitution of VDCs mentioning provision for changing any office bearers (impeachment and election).

8. Cash in hand issue

Process observations: Kismot Ali, the cashier of a PMC under Nachni Ghagoa VDC in the Tarapur Union of Sundargonj Upazila had Tk.13,150 as cash in hand out of Tk.30,000 he collected from the villagers as community contribution for implementation of a road sub- project. As per rule, he was supposed to deposit the amount in the bank account immediately after collection. PMA team also made a report on this issue in the earlier NFRs.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Process issues arising: Keeping such an amount as cash in hand may create dissatisfaction among the PMC members. And there is a possibility that the Cashier will use the money for his own personal purposes, whereby the road sub-project will be delayed in initiation or completion as the cash in hand misutilized by the cashier may not be repaid in a timely manner. Additionally, other PMC members may use this as an example to keep with them such amounts as cash in hand.

Process recommendations: CSO shall follow up the matter and insist on the Cashier to deposit the cash in hand in the bank account of the PMC as early as possible. CSO should also motivate other PMCs not to keep any amount as cash in hand beyond provision.

~/~

5.1.3. NFR Code No. J-6/ February 2005: Areas of Visit- Jamalpur

Introduction: This NFR report has been prepared by the Jamalpur PMA team based on its field visits to a number of SIPP villages during February 2005. During the field visits, the team observed various activities on-going in the field under SIPP and discussed with the villagers about the progress and performance of the project works, and finally shared findings with the PO, CSO, PAST and SDF. The following are the key findings from the February 05 process monitoring of SIPP:

1. Capacity building and sustainability of Functional Groups

Process observations: While discussing with the president and members of the Functional Group (FG) formed under Social Assistance Program (SAP) in the Jhalor char village under Bahadurabad union of Dewangonj Upazila, the PMA team noticed that the committee members do not know the name of their FG and are not aware about their roles and responsibilities. While reviewing the resolution book, the PMA team also observed that the October 04 and January 05 meeting minutes are not recorded in the resolution book. They also observed that the quality of meeting minutes recorded for previous meetings was very poor. Some of the meeting minutes even had no signature of the president and members who attended in the meetings.

Process issues arising: A concern has been raised in connection with the sustainability of these Functional Groups after phasing out of the PO.

Process recommendations: (i) PO should reinforce the FGs to hold the monthly meetings on a regular basis. (ii) PO needs to take more initiatives to improve the individual capacity of the FG leaders in conducting meetings, writing minutes, maintaining simple accounts, etc. In most of the cases, meeting resolutions are presently recorded by Social Worker of PO, but PO should gradually transfer this responsibility to the FGs.

2. Repeating of road sub-project proposal without prior consent of the private landowners

Process observations: Road sub-project implementation was delayed in some of the first year villages, for example, in Purba Katamoni village under Kendua Union and in Dhaskin Kathar Beel under Bahadurabad Union due to objection raised by the private landowners. According to SIPP operational manual, the road or any other sub-project implementation

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report under SIPP should be preferably on the public/ common land. In a given sub-project, if the use of private land is unavoidable in that case prior consent and acquisition of required land should be obtained through legal mechanisms from the private landowners. A copy of the land transfer contract should be provided with the application form of the sub project.

Process issues arising: The same mistake has been observed in the road works in some of the second year villages. For example, the appraisal of road sub-project in Haiatpur village under Sreepur union and Shakh Para village under Rashidpur union has been stopped due to objection from the private landowners. A 250m connecting road in Dariarpar village under Nilakshmia union is subject to a conflict as no prior legal permission was obtained from the private landowners on which the road is to be built and the owner beside the road before starting the appraisal work.

Process recommendations: (i) It is recommended that the CF of CSO should pay more visits to the road sub-project areas before preparing the proposal/ CAP and conduct a general meeting with the villagers to get their consent regarding possible use of private land for earthwork. (ii) The CF should also collect a list of private land owners on which the road is to be built and the owner beside the proposed road and negotiate with them through VDC and PMC for donation of their land for road construction.

3. Road repairing works may face difficulties for not having adequate land for soil collection

Process observations: Most of the villages in Jamalpur district are in char area where roads are often damaged by heavy rainfalls and floods. As was common, the roads so far constructed or repaired in different villages under SIPP in Jamalpur district were affected during last year s flood. Therefore, this year there has been an increasing demand for road sub-projects from the villagers of these villages. However, roadworks increasingly appear becoming difficult in many villages because they do not have adequate land from which to collect soil. In many areas, the private landowners refused to allow soil collection from their land. As an alternative, collecting soil from public land at long distances is found not cost effective. So having no alternative the road works in some areas have been progressing by collecting soil from burrow pits and fallow ponds adjacent to the roads.

Process issues arising: There is every possibility of landslides of roads at the point of those burrow pits and ponds. The PMA team reported on the same issue in NFR-5 to draw attention of all concerned. As it is very important to find an appropriate solution, so the PMA team is reporting the issue again.

Process recommendations: (i) CSO, PAST and VDC need to undertake more discussions with the private landowners in order to convince them to spare their land for soil collection to build the road for the greater interest of the community. (ii) PMC/ VDC can think about other alternatives, such as revising the budget for soil collection.

4. Community contribution remaining as cash in hand

Process observations: In Balorchar village under Bahadurabad Union of Dewangonj Upazila, the community contribution collected from the villagers has not yet been deposited in the bank account. Even the bank account has not yet been opened by the VDC/ PMC. So

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report the amount (more than Tk.10,000) so far collected from the villagers has remained as cash in hand with the President of the VDC.

Process issues arising: Villagers are not happy to see that the community contribution has remained cash in hand with the President of VDC for a long time. Having noticed that the community contribution has not yet been deposited in the bank account, some of the villagers refused to pay their part of community contribution.

Process recommendations: CSO should follow up the issue and reinforce the VDC to open the bank account as early as possible and to deposit the money in the bank account.

~/~

5.1.4. NFR Code No. G-6/ February 2005: Area of visit- Gaibandha

Introduction: During February 2005, the Gaibandha PMA team visited 11 villages; of which 3 were first year villages and 8 were second year villages. During the field visits, the team attended the inaugural sessions of 2 road sub-projects in 2 villages. They facilitated a daylong orientation on the Report Card methodology for TMSS staff. Apart from these activities, they also attended in the monthly and quarterly coordination meetings of the project.

1. Amount of Community Contribution appears too big for some poor households

Process observations: 80 GC members of the Komorpur VDC under Bollamjhar Union of Gaibandha Sadar Upazila decided to pay Tk.1,000 each as community contribution for implementation of various sub-projects. A similar decision was also observed taken by the Purbo Mouza Malibari VDC under Laxmipur Unoin of Sadar Upazila. A total of 68 GC members of this VDC decided to contribute a total of Tk.90,000 for sub-project implementation, of which 6 Executives from VDC and PMC agreed to pay Tk.10,000 each and for the remaining to be paid by the other villagers.

Process issues arising: Paying a large amount of community contribution by some selected members of a community for a sub-project is not expected rather involvement of maximum number of villagers is encouraged in the project. Community ownership is an important aspect of the project. Community contribution is a technique to create a sense of ownership among the villagers regarding SIPP. Moreover, some large amount payers may have some underlying motivation to contribute more.

Process recommendations: (i) CSO/ VDC/ PMC should consider the economic condition of the poor households while fixing community contribution. (ii) Households belonging to different economic classes should be included in the contribution list and the amount of contribution should be decided according to ability of the households. (iii) CSO and PAST should develop and follow an appropriate mechanism against any misappropriation of project resources.

2. VDC monthly meeting is becoming irregular

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Process observations: In Shekherpara Boiddanath VDC under Sonaray Union of Sundargonj Upazila, the January 2005 VDC meeting was not held. The Komorpur VDC under Sadar Unoin of Gaibandha Upazila did not update the resolution book, and the Kazol Dhop VDC under Gaibandha Sadar Union did not record the date and decisions of the January 2005 monthly meeting in the resolution book. In case of Kazol Dhop VDC, the PMA team also observed that many other previous decisions of the VDC and PMC have not been recorded in the resolution book.

Process issues arising: If the monthly meetings of a VDC becomes irregular, then the VDC will loss its dynamism and spirit to perform its duties and responsibilities in the village development process under SIPP. Villagers will also lose their trust and confidence on the capacity and commitment of the VDC at some stage. On the other hand, if the resolution book is not updated on a timely manner it will raise question at some stage about the transparency and accountability of the VDC.

Process recommendations: (i) CSO staff should give orientations to the VDC members regarding importance of holding VDC meetings regularly and keeping resolutions of the meetings properly. (ii) They should review the books and documents maintained by a VDC on a regular basis and encourage the VDC members to keep the books and documents in an updated manner.

3. Roads constructed without protection fence beside the ponds will get damage quickly

Process observations: Under SIPP, 7 roads have Table 1: Roads constructed beside ponds been constructed in the Daxin Kazibari Sontola VDC name # of road # of ponds VDC under Bongram Union of Sadullapur beside the road Upazila. The PMA team observed that each of Daxin 1 2 these roads passed beside one or more ponds in Kazibari 2 5 several locations, where no protection measures Sontola VDC 3 4 4 1 were taken against potential threat of landslide 5 9 during rainy season. The team also observed 6 5 similar matters in the roads constructed in the 7 4 Uttar Kazibari Sontola village under Bongram Uttar Kazibari 1 1 Union of Sadullapur Upazila. Table 1 shows the Sontola VDC 2 6 3 5 number of roads constructed in the Daxin and 4 4 Uttar Kazibari Sontala villages having ponds beside the roads but where no protection measures were undertaken.

Process issues arising: It appears that these roads are susceptible to damage during monsoon in the locations where ponds exist beside the roads as no protection measures were undertaken. The issue was also reported by the PMA team earlier (NFR # 5).

Process recommendations: (i) It is expected that PAST will develop technically sound designs for an infrastructural sub-project in future. (ii) PAST should review the previous road sub-projects, which are susceptible to damage and should come up with recommendations.

5. Difference observed between final bill and actual payment

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Process observations: A big difference has been observed between the final payment as stipulated in the appraisal document and the final payment received by the PMC. In case of Chikney village under Jamalpur Union of Sadullapur Upazila, it was observed that the PMC 1 & 2 submitted two final bills of tube well sub-projects, which were Tk.12,064 and Tk. 10,162 respectively. But the actual payment was reduced significantly and they were finally paid Tk. 3,127 and Tk.3,346 respectively. Such difference also observed in case of Khordo Rosulpur VDC under Jamalpur Union of Sadullapur Upazila. In this case, the PMC submitted a final bill of Tk.15,264 for a road sub-project but the amount paid was reduced remarkably and only Tk.6,482 was eventually paid to the PMC.

Process issues arising: Such a big difference between final bill submitted by PMC and actual payment received by PMC has raised some questions about the quality of appraisal and integrity of the PMC members. Villagers are not clear why the PMC submitted bills for such an increased amount and how the payment reduced by 60-75%. The villagers wanted to know the facts behind such differences. They also interested to know the policy and provision of preparing and revising sub-project bills.

Process recommendations: (i) PAST should look into the matter and clarify the villagers about the policy and provision of appraisal & billing and their subsequent revisions. (ii) PAST should provide necessary orientation to the PMC and VDC about the importance of accurate billing.

~/~

5.1.5. NFR Code No. J-7/March 2005: Area of visit: Jamalpur district

Introduction: This NFR report has been prepared by the Jamalpur PMA team based on their field visits to a number of SIPP villages during March 2005. During field visits, they observed various activities on-going in the field, discussed with the villagers about progress and performance of the project works, and finally shared findings with the PO, CSO and PAST separately and in the district coordination meeting. The following are the key findings from process monitoring of SIPP during March 2005:

1. Poor participants selection and poor quality of PRA training

Process observations: HPO and TAT conducted PRA training with the VDC members from 15 VDCs, taking 3 members from each VDC. In this PRA training VDC members were trained on 4 different PRA tools namely: Health hazard mapping, Venn diagram, seasonal diseases analysis and mobility mapping. The objective was to equip the VDC members with these PRA tools so that they can conduct the same exercises in their respective villages under the supervision of CHW. Accordingly the trained VDC members of the Vatiparal8 village conducted three PRA exercises and the Paschim Amkhawa village conducted two PRA exercises, after they have received the PRA training, on 6 and 9 November 2004 respectively.

8 In Vatipara village, HPO provided PRA training to two girls (VDC members selected them) and one VDC member due to the fact that VDC members are not available all the time in the village. 31

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Process issues arising: From discussion with the trained VDC members, it appears that majority of them forget most the processes and steps of the PRA exercises and thus it is difficult for them to conduct PRA training. Some of the VDC members are so busy, for instance, the president of Paschim Amkhawa VDC, thus it is almost impossible to manage time for conducting village level PRA exercises for them. In such a situation, how the PRA exercises would be conducted in these villages is a concern for all.

Process recommendations: (1) It is recommended to improve the quality of PRA training to the VDC members by employing skilled PRA facilitators. (2) It is also recommended to select interested and capable VDC members for the PRA training who can spare time for conducting village level PRA exercises after receiving of training.

2. Status of village level PRA implementation by the VDC members

Process observations: According to HPO Project Manager, the trained VDC members were supposed to conduct PRA exercises on seasonal variation of diseases and health hazard mapping in their respective villages. The timeframe for conducting the health hazard mapping was from December 04 to March 05 and for conducting the seasonal disease variation analysis was from April 05 onwards. In this process the concerned CHW was supposed to provide necessary assistance to VDC members.

Process issues arising: As mentioned in issue 1, the trained VDC members so far have conducted a total of 5 PRA sessions from December 2004 to February 2005. Out of 5 PRA sessions, 2 sessions were conducted in Vatipara village by the respective VDC and three sessions were conducted in Paschim Amkhawa village by the respective VDC. However, according to the HPO manager, it was mandatory to conduct 12 PRA sessions in each village within these three months. So the difference between target and achievement is quite big. When the PMA team inquired reasons behind such difference with the HPO manager, he mentioned that the HPO s involvement with the baseline survey from mid January prevented it from giving time to the VDC members for conducting village level PRA sessions. Another issue observed is that the 5 PRA exercises conducted by the villagers were not documented by the respective CHW.

Process recommendations: (1) Adequate attention and priority should be given to the PRA sessions since it is an important activity of the MCHC project. (2) CHW should develop better plan combining all activities to be implemented at the same time. (3) Documentation of all PRA sessions conducted at village level should be ensured by CHW.

3. Village selection for SIPP and river erosion factor

Process observations: One of the SIPP village selection criteria was not to select a village for sub-project implementation, which has a possibility of facing river erosion. It is the responsibility of the CSO to ensure these types of villages are not selected for SIPP works, whereas the responsibility of PAST is feasibility analysis, appraisals of sub-project proposals in a given village and disregarding any proposals coming from villages which might face river erosion. It has observed that the repair work of an earthen road in the Jalor char village under Bahadurabad Union of Dewangonj upazila is about to finish. This village is situated on the bank of Balujhuri River. About 150m entry point of this road is just next to the river.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

The slope of this road touches the riverbed. The soil is sandy and the river erosion rate in this part of the village is high.

Process issues arising: It appears that this road will get damaged by the next monsoon due to river erosion. At least the slope of this road is susceptible to washing away with the result that the entire road would become unusable.

Process recommendations: (1) It is recommended to conduct more feasibility analysis by the CSO before selection of a village for development works under SIPP. (2) SDF may sanction an advice letter to the CSO to remain careful during selection of a village and various sub- projects within that village.

4. Number of shutters/forma allocation for pipe culvert

Process observation: A stipulated number of shutters or forma for casting the pipe culvert has been allocated to the union or village cluster by the PAST, irrespective of the number of culverts to be built in a Union/ village cluster. Two clusters were formed in the Kendua Union encompassing 5 villages in each and two 600 dia and one 900 dia shutters have been allocated for each. The pipe culvert can be removed from the shutter after the third day i.e., it needs 48 hours after casting. A community-based center has been established for manufacturing the quality pipe culvert.

Process issues arising: It has been planned to build a large number of pipe culverts in the above mentioned village clusters (where there are 5 villages in each cluster) but provision of number of shutters/ forma is insufficient. Moreover, the allocated number of shutters (e.g. 2 of 600 dia), for a cluster was not made at the outset. President of PMC Md. Amirul Islam said that after about one month, the PMC of Kendua union made a 2nd forma due to the financial shortage9. In addition, a question has been raised whether it is appropriate to set up the pipe culverts just before starting monsoon season. The plan is found very weak. The issues have been discussed in the monthly coordination meeting in April 05. The Team Leader of PAST informed in the meeting that presently the shutters are being used for 24 hours10 instead of 48 hours.

Table: Number of culverts & shutters and required number of days for completion.

Name of Pipe Number Days Pipe Number of Days need Union culvert of needed culvert Forma/Sutte so far (600 mm) Forma/ so far (900 mm) r Shutter Luxmircha 124 3 83 28 1 56 r (8 villages) Kendua 67 2 66 24 1 47 (5 villages)

9 The total costs allocated for making the shutters in the budget were distributed proportionately among all the villages of a union or cluster. The contribution collection process among the different villages under a union or cluster could not maintain the same pace. So, the PMC which deposited its full contribution first has started works first and faces financial crisis as the other villages within the cluster failed to deposit their part of contribution in a timely manner. 10 The time is reduced which raises the question whether the quality of work is maintained. 33

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Moreover, the number of days taken from initiating collection of contributions to making pipe culverts in Luxmirchar upazilla is found to be very long to complete sub-project implementation in a timely manner. The village Purba Charpara started pipe culvert casting first amongst the villages of this union on 4th March 05 and ended on 15th March 05. Days spent in Baruamari uttar paschim para is shown below: - Contribution collection starts on: 15.10.2004 - Community contribution deposited on: 20.12.2004 - Bank statement submitted to SDF on: 22.12.2004 - SDF disbursed first installment on: 28.12.04 - Casting of pipe culvert started on: 15.03.04 - Casting of pipe culvert ended on: 22.03.04 About 65 days had been spent on collecting community contributions and about 77 days had been spent to start building culvert from the date the money was disbursed. The first installment for this village has been disbursed on 28th Dec. 04 but the date of order for making the shutters/ forma is 7th Feb 04. Here, no reasons have been found for spending about 40 days to place an order for shutters. Even the total days (about one month, as stated by a PMC member) spent for making a shutters/forma is found too high.

Process recommendations: (1) It is recommended to increase11 the number of forma/Shutters for timely implementation of culverts. (2) CSO and PAST can pay more effort for timely submission of community contribution.

5. Whether testing the quality of compaction of a road is required?

Process observations: The villagers have done the road compaction work of a newly constructed road manually. According to policy, after completion it is now mandatory to test the quality of compaction of the road by the LGED and a budget12 is allocated for such testing.

Process issues arising: At the onset of this compaction work, PAST made a request to the SDF not to make compaction test mandatory if it is done manually. The test is required if the compaction has been done mechanically. Now it is not clear whether testing is required or not.

Process Recommendations: Considering the opinion of PAST, SDF may revisit its decision in this regard.

6. Repetition of work between CSO and PO in preparing hardcore poor list

Process observations: The list classifying the households into four socio-economic classes which was prepared by CSO for each 2nd year village was supposed to be used by PO to work in those 2nd year villages after cross checking the list. But the PO has started to prepare a new list of only the hardcore poor in those 2nd year villages by inviting villagers for a PRA exercise. Here the PO is preparing the list of hardcore poor just by asking the villagers to review their livelihood conditions with the prefixed hardcore poor criteria shown in the

11 The forma/shutter may be sold out to the 3rd year villages with the help of PAST. The amount can be deposited in the VDCs account. 12 See road sub-project appraisal report headed Item of works with bill of quantities , serial no.: 07 (iii) Compaction (Std. proctor) 34

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report brown paper. In this exercise, the PO also plotted the household location of the hardcore poor on the brown sheet and started cross checking and at the same time conducting baseline survey through door-to-door visits. Before cross checking, however, the PO verified the draft list with the list prepared by CSO. Another observation is that there was a significant difference between the two lists of hardcore poor prepared by CSO and PO.

Process issues arising: It seems that the PO is repeating the same work done by CSO. PO could easily use the hardcore poor list prepared by CSO in those villages, which would save transaction costs, project resources and time. Conducting baseline survey (by PO) based on newly prepared hardcore poor list (without finalizing the list) is also a concern.

Since the PO did not check the list prepared by CSO through door-to-door visits and some of the CSO listed hardcore poor were dropped in the PO list, so there is some unrest among the hardcore poor who have been dropped.

As there is an impression among the villagers that the hardcore poor will get more benefit from SIPP, so while preparing the list, most of the villagers attempted to show/ prove themselves as hardcore poor to become enlisted in the PO list. This raises the question about the accuracy of the hardcore poor list prepared by PO. On the other hand, there are also comments and concerns about the hardcore poor list prepared by CSO because it has followed a different process in preparing the hardcore poor list in these villages and did not cross check the list randomly. In addition, the processes followed by CSO are not similar in the same project area13 or even in both the districts and the results are not crosschecked randomly14 . (The Manager CD, SDF agrees with this observation).

Process Recommendations: (1) It is recommended that PO and CSO must work in a more collaborative manner to avoid overlapping or duplication of works. (2) In particular, to work in the second year villages, it is recommended that the PO should follow the list prepared by the CSO. In that case, the PO should crosscheck the list by physical visits to the listed households. (3) While recommending PO to follow the list prepared by CSO, it is also recommended that CSO must be more sincere in preparing the hardcore poor list following necessary process and steps completely.

7. Review the old CAP or make a new annual plan for the first year villages.

Process observations: The first annual action plan was prepared by the VDCs during 2003 in the first year villages. Now activities in those villages are in their second year, but they have not yet started to review their old CAPs or prepare a new Annual Action Plan except the VDCs in Luxmirchar union.

Process issues arising: 10 VDCs under Luxmirchar union prepared annual action plans and submitted those to a spontaneously formed Union Coordination Committee (UCC) comprising of the representatives of the VDCs. The UCC is an informal networking body and is not endorsed by the SIPP yet. This may be a good initiative but the role of UCC is not yet defined. There is a possibility that the VDC developed plan will be manipulated by the few members of the UCC.

13 See NFR J-2, October 05; Serial number-2 14 See NFR J-1 September 04, Hardcore poor list and data cross checking

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Process Recommendations: i) The issue has been discussed in the monthly coordination meeting, April 05. A quick action has to be implemented by the SDF to prepare/ review CAP in time. ii) Every partner and SDF should think about the role of UCC.

Other observations a) Observation about VDC meeting, resolution keeping and cash management in Luxmirchar Uttar Para village

After phasing out of CSO from the 2nd year villages, PO is responsible to attend in the monthly meeting of the 2nd year villages. It was reported by the PO during monthly coordination meeting that the VDCs have been conducting the monthly meeting regularly and the concerned social worker of PO are attending these meetings. But it was observed that the monthly meeting for the month of February 05 was not held and the signature of VDC members was missing in the resolution of January 05 meeting in case of Luxmirchar Uttar Para village.

It has observed that the cash management especially for the culvert sub-project is not occurring properly in the case of Luxmirchar Uttar Para VDC. The cashier of this VDC and the president of PMC of Mayddhay Kutamoni VDC agreed with this finding. Concerned PAST official expressed the same opinion and told that new accountants will be recruited to follow up the mentioned issues. b) Adding a part of village with another village and related issues

Part of the Gopinathpur village has been added to Hatuvanga village in Digpait Union of the Jamalpur Sadar Upazila whereby 60 households from the Gopinathpur village are now come under Hatuvanga village. This was done for SIPP implementation purposes. About 60 households of a part of Hatuvanga village are not interested to work under this new approach. The PMA team discussed this issue during the monthly meeting and drew the attention of all concerned to this matter. c) Slope of the SIPP roads

All the SIPP partners including SDF are very much aware and concerned about the slopes of the SIPP roads constructed presently, which seem very fragile in some locations having every possibility of getting damaged during heavy rainfall. The issue has also risen before during April 05 monthly meeting. Adequate attention is required from all concerned, especially from SDF on this issue. d) Poor are paid very low by VDC/PMC for road compaction work

Benefits of the poor and women should be one of the main concerns of the VDCs. But it has observed in case of Sontiapotol village that the VDC/ PMC contracted 14 laborers, 12 women and 2 men, for Tk.3,000 to complete the compaction work of a 300 meter long road. The laborers have already worked for 7 days and more 7 days will be required to complete the remaining work. In this situation, each laborer would get Tk.15.30 only for

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

each working day, which appears quite low. So the benefit of the poor is not being considered here by the VDC/PMC.

Refering to this road mentioned above, the PMC invited tenders from interested groups stating that 3 days of work would be required for compacting the road. It was reported that a women team also participated in this tender and was awarded this compaction work because of the lowest rate was quoted by them. Now if it goes to take 14 days to complete the compaction work, and they have quoted such a low rate due to lack of prior experience in participating in such bids and lack of capacity in computing the volume of work, therefore the rate should be revised as per standard rate in this regard.

~/~

5.1.6. NFR Code No. G-7/ March 2005: Areas of Visit - Gaibandha District

Introduction: This NFR presents the findings of the Gaibandha PMA team from their visit to 12 SIPP villages during March 2005. In this month, other than conducting Field Visit Assessments, Focus Group Discussions and developing Case Studies, the PMA team also facilitated a one day orientation on the Report Card Methodology for the CSO ESDO staff. They also visited tornado affected villages at Sadullapur and Sundargonj Upazila and collected information on damage caused by the tornado. Apart from these activities, the team also participated in the District Coordination Meeting and prepared meeting minutes.

1. Dissemination of information to the VDC/PMC members and hardcore poor Process observation: The PMA team observed some information gaps between PO staff and VDC members and hardcore poor of the Daxin Kanchibari village under Kanchibari Union of Sundargonj Upazila. PO (BEES) field staff informed the VDC and hardcore poor of this village that out of 136 hardcore poor, only 40 HHs would receive training and 32 HHs would be entitled to receive seed money. This information confused the hardcore poor as well as VDC members regarding training and seed money distribution policy. This is because they have different information about training and seed money entitlement, which they learned from the neighboring first year village, and that is that all the hardcore poor are eligible to receive different trainings under SIPP. Process issues arising: The hardcore poor households, who aspired for training and seed money from SIPP, are now dejected thinking they will be excluded from benefiting from this opportunity. The VDC and PMC members are frustrated having heard the information from PO staff. Process recommendations: (1) It is recommended that PO staff should avoid disseminating such information at the outset, which may create frustration among the community members. (2) To clear up misunderstandings, the PMA recommends that the Project Coordinator of PO (BEES) organizes a special meeting of his staff with the villagers and VDC and PMC members of that village.

2. Exclusion of hardcore poor households from the list

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Process observations: In the Daxin Kanchibari village under Kanchibari Union of Sundargonj Upazila a total of 35 households were excluded from the list, of which 20 HHs are extreme or hardcore poor, according to VDC members. Actually there are 400 HHs in this village. Of them, 365 HHs were recorded in the household list. According to excluded households members, they tried to bring the matter to the notice of CSO staff and others but in vain. Process issues arising: Excluded household members and others in this villager are concerned regarding sincerity, neutrality and transparency of those who are involved with household list preparation. Since money allocation for village development is directly proportionate to the total household number in a village, thus the matter also causes consternation among VDC.

Process recommendations: (1) It is recommended that CSO staff should be more careful during preparation of household list in a village. If required they should crosscheck the list twice or thrice with key informants. (2) In the case of this incident, CSO may consider including the households who did not appear in the list.

3. Long delay in CIW implementation

Process observations: Implementation of earthwork for road and culvert sub-projects has not yet started in a number of second year villages as listed below:

1) Daxmin Sotirjan village under Sotirjan Union of the Sundorganj Upazila 2) Santiram village under Santiram Union of the Sundorganj Upazila 3) Santiram Kaliarchira village under Santiram Union of the Sundorganj Upazila 4) Choto Chotrogacha village under Dahperhat of the Sadullapur Upazial 5) Boro Gopalpur village under Khordo Komorpur of the Upazila Sadullapur village

PMA team discussed the issue with the VDC and PMC members of the respective villages and tried to know the reasons behind delay in starting the earthwork. They informed that the PAST field engineer does not come timely in the field for project appraisal, so the ultimate consequence is the delay in starting the earthwork. They also informed that the sub-project proposal, which was prepared and submitted 15-30 days before, has not yet been appraised. As the PMC/ VDC members have yet not received the final appraisal, so they could not start the collection of community contribution. They are worried whether they will be able to collect so large an amount of community contribution (Tk. 6 100 thousands) within the short period that will be left after the receiving of the final appraisal. Since most of the villagers are hardcore poor, it would be difficult for them too to pay the community contribution within a short period. When the issue was discussed with the PAST, they informed that they have shortage of measurement machines and Field Engineers so they failed to maintain the schedule. According to PMC members, they are waiting for about two months for the PAST Engineer to arrive for appraisal.

Process issues arising: Because of delay in starting the sub-projects it will be difficult to collect soil from the nearby lands because the lands are already cultivated with Boro paddy. SIPP may have to wait up to next season to start the road and culvert sub-project implementation. It might also impact negatively on achieving target in community

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report contribution collection within the short time availale when the sub-project implementation starts.

Process recommendation: (1) PAST should be proactive in starting the sub-project works, especially the earthwork during the most suitable season, which is from early December to mid February. (2) PAST should remain well planned and prepared in advance with necessary equipment and human resources so that it need not face problems such as shortage of machine or engineers, etc.

4. VDC meeting minutes are not taking regularly by an increasing number of VDCs.

Process observations: The PMA team found at VDC Santiram (a second year village, Union Santiram, Upazila Sundorganj) that the resolution of VDC meetings had not been written for a consecutive 3 months (December 04, January and February 05). Members of the VDC stated that there were no activities of SIPP during this time. According to the villagers, concerned staff from CSO was also irregular in their visits to this village during this reporting period. The same practice was also observed in the case of Daxmin Sotirjan village under Sotirjan Union of the Sundorganj Upazila. The PMC of this village met only once over the three month period. This issue was also reported in the last NFR.

Process issues arising: Recording the meeting minutes is an important aspect of the culture and documentation of an organization. It increases accountability and transparency, which can contribute in the institutionalization process and sustainability of local community based organizations.

Process recommendations: (1) It is recommended that the CSO should pay more attention to VDC meetings so that the meetings are organized on a regular basis and the meeting minutes are recorded properly. Here the CF may facilitate VDC members in taking the meeting minutes properly to build their capacity in this regard.

5. Earth collection and maintenance of road sub-project

Process observations: A road was built in the Daxin Badlagari village under Sadullapur Upazila where the earth was collected from the adjacent lands thus creating deep holes. There is a strong likelihood that this road will be damaged in those locations during the monsoon due to landslides. This VDC has already completed 4 roads in this way, where deep holes exist very close to the road. Already there has been observed small damages at least at 10 locations on these newly constructed roads due to rainfall. The same situation was also observed with regards to road construction in the Uttar Jamudanga village under Damodorpur Union of Sadullapur Picture showing deep holes adjacent to the newly constructed road (VDC Uttar Jamudanga) 39

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Upazila. VDC/PMC is not taking any initiative to protect these roads.

Process issues arising: These roads are susceptible to get damaged at the weak parts/ locations during monsoon when heavy rainfall will start, if the necessary protection measures are not taken.

Process recommendation: (1) It is recommended that PAST should try to implement the road sub-projects during the time when lands are free of crops so that soil can be collected from different near by places. (2) It is also recommended that the PAST and VDC/PMCs take necessary measures for the protection of the roads, which are already constructed and have a chance of getting damaged.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

5.2. Annex 2

CASE STUDIES

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

5.2..1 Case Study Code No.-J-4/March 2005: Children has come to immunization

Proper campaign can break all barriers and Taboos

Nanda Rani Das, the only child of a fisher household was not immunized. After being immunized, children usually suffer from fever and diarrhoea and that s why we delayed her immunization said her mother, Maneka Nama Das. However, the child came under immunization when she was 11 months of age and that was possible only after a successful campaign of the Social Assistance Program under Social Investment Program Project.

A poor community lives in the southern part of the Paschim Amkhawa village of Hativangha Union under Dewangonj Upazila whose main livelihood depend on fishing. The socio-economic condition of this community is miserable and they are reluctant to take up development interventions due to lack of proper education.

Community people believe that immunization is good for health and saves children from deadly diseases like Polio, Measles and Tetanus. But they also say they are worried about the immediate effects on children who are immunized. In some cases, infection creates sores on the parts of the body where the child was injected.

Kalpona Rani, a neighbor of Meneaka said, ``I immunized my children timely though it creates some difficulties. Immunization is essential for the children to protect them from various diseases. But, Meneka has wrong conception about immunization.

Meneaka had to see the death of her two children. Her first son died at the age of 4 months due to an unidentified disease. Her second child died after 7 days of birth due to diarrhoea. Maneka with her newly Now she has a daughter and Meneaka is very much conscious immunized Daughter of her. She does not want to take any risk for her daughter now.

Shadhana Nama Das, who has one son named Pradip Nama Das of two years age, is living in the same cluster. Pradip was born in the house of his maternal grandfather. Shadhana returned to her house from her parent s home when Pradip was 5 months old. She did not immunize her child like Meneka due to the same apprehensions. After awareness campaigns by SIPP, Shadhana accompanied Meneaka to immunize her child too. Unfortunately, it was too late for her son, Pradip, who is now over 2 years old. She is regretting loosing the opportunity to get him vaccinated and told that if SIPP would have come some years back her child could also have been immunized.

The system of immunization is that after three months of birth every baby should get the first dosage of immunization with vitamin A capsule. It takes two years to complete the course. Sheafali Begum, government local health worker is responsible for Paschim Amkhawa 42

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report village. On the immunization day she invites all the villagers to come in immunization centre for immunizing their children.

The 7th December 2004 was a special day for Meneka as her daughter got 3 types of immunization vaccines namely BCG, DPT and Polio in their village immunization center (house of a UP member). Papia Biswash has been working with this fisher community as Social Worker of Social Investment Program Project since last seven months. She was able to remove all misconceptions prevailing among the women folk in the community like Meneka through proper campaigns including meetings and personal contacts. SIPP conducted awareness raising campaigns on dowry, early marriage, immunization and various social issues.

Meneaka said, I was in the dark and so I did not know many useful things. But now I realize that immunization is not at all harmful rather life saving for the children of vulnerable families like us. She was firm that each children of this fisher community would surely take immunization in time in future.

~/~

5.2..2 Case Study Code No.-G-3/January 05: A good start not always ends good

A good start not always ends good, a lesson to be learned

[A case study prepared by PMA team of Gaibandha during their field visit assessment in January 2005]

Chikney is a remote village under Jamalpur Union of Sadullapur Upazila, Gaibandha district where SIPP started its rural development work in September 2003. Around 480 households live in this village and by occupation they are mainly agriculture laborers. The majority of the households have no hint of well-being and livelihood security. They lag behind other villages of this district. Health, hygiene, education, income, employment, etc. are their acute problems, where sanitation and hygiene is the worst. The SIPP baseline survey reveals that out of 480, only 8 households have sanitary latrines in this village.

It is more than 1 year that the SIPP started its work in this village. Since then, many things of this village have changed. One of the remarkable changes is found in sanitation and hygiene practices. In 2003, when the baseline survey was completed and the VDC was formed in this village, a priority decision was made to bring the village under 100 percent sanitation coverage. Accordingly the VDC and the PMCs of this village started their work with a great aspiration and enthusiasm. They, with support from Participating Organization (PO), established a production centre of sanitary latrine materials in the village with an objective to ensure supply of low cost sanitary latrine materials to the poor villagers. PO helped them providing six different models of low-cost sanitary latrines. Different models and their price list are shown below:

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Fig. 1: Different Models of Low-Cost Sanitary Latrine

Sl Model Name Price (Tk.) 1 Ditch (Gortho) latrine 250 2 Offset latrine 96 3 Offset latrine 80 4 Soil jar (Matir Motka) latrine 165 5 Ring Slab (Jolaboddho) Latrine 212 6 Ring Slab (Poramatir Chalk) Latrine 176

This initiative resulted in popularizing sanitary latrines among the poor households of this village. Many of them showed their interest in installing low-cost sanitary latrines, especially Model 3 and 5 as shown above in figure 1. After starting in early 2004, more than 190 sets of latrine materials have been produced from the centre, of which 160 sets have already been sold among the villagers. An increasing demand has also been observed among the villagers who are not yet procured the sanitary latrine materials. Anticipating popularity and demand, the production centre has an aim to build up a good stock of the sanitary latrine materials so that people can get readily prepared materials as and when they require.

To ensure the interest and demand of the villagers in sanitation and hygiene continues to grow and sustain, the VDC of Chikney village has also started an awareness building and literacy centre, from where so far 76 females got literacy and functional education. On their own initiative, the VDC also started savings scheme with the villagers, where 120 households enrolled their names. It will be inspiring to know that in this savings scheme already Tk.30,000 has been accumulated. The Chickney VDC also leased a 50 decimal water body from a local elite to cultivate fish for five years and they are now embarking on a market shade construction scheme. All these development stories of the Chickney village were really inspiring and delighting for all connected with the SIPP, which the PMA team observed in their several visits to this village.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

However, from a recent visit to this village, the PMA team observed decline in inspiration and motivation among the villagers about sanitary latrines. They were quite taken aback to see the situation and identified several factors responsible for such downgrading of sanitation activities in this village, which are follows:

1. Frequent natural disasters and thereby damage of the sanitary latrines de- motivated villagers to some extent in procuring sanitary latrines. In this year, the village has already been affected three times by flash floods. Sanitary latrines materials produced from the production 2. Discontinuation of some centre established by Chickney VDC services which were offered earlier but stopped later on. For example, Chikney VDC offered free of cost door to door supply of sanitary materials but has stopped this now which has contributed to lowering demand of sanitary latrines further. 3. There were some other reasons which were related to community contribution, difference of amount approved and the actual payment made by PAST for sub- projects, etc. which also worked negatively to deflate the demand of the sanitary latrine.

Here the lesson that can be learnt is that good initiatives do not always have smooth rides. There are many variables and events which confront otherwise good intentions and commitments and a balanced response is thus called for. Here a suggestion we may forward to the Chickney VDC is to gear up the motivation work further and be mindful of influencing factors that may work negatively to achieve the mission of the VDC s aim of 100% sanitation of its village.

~/~

5.2.3 Case Study Code No.-G-4/February 05: Making VDCs sustainable -views of key stakeholders Making VDCs sustainable -views of key stakeholders [An appreciative inquiry on sustainability of VDCs by the Gaibandha PMA team during their field visit assessment in February 2005]

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

The Village Development Committee (VDC) is a concept under SIPP to develop grassroots institutions in the community to play active role in village development. SIPP has a vision that the VDCs that are developing today would sustain and continue to function in future when the SIPP will be no more in these villages to address future problems and needs of the poor villagers. Therefore, the success of the SIPP will no doubt be measured based on the number of dynamic, capable and sustainable VDCs which are developed by the project before it phases out. PMA team made an appreciative participatory inquiry on this issue searching for key indicators or factors that are desired and must be attained and maintained. The PMA team ended their inquiry with the following findings from different key stakeholders:

Villagers opinions to make a VDC sustainable

VDCs should have constitution and all the members of the Executive Committee and General Body must follow the constitution for guiding, controlling and managing the VDCs. VDCs must have legal status i.e. registration from the Department of Social Welfare or any other departments of the government. VDCs should be have strong leadership and the leaders must be accountable to the villagers for their tasks and performance. Skill of VDC members must be developed to such a level that they can run the institution independently when SIPP exits. Here villagers emphasized on financial management skills, record keeping and report keeping skills, leadership skills, communication skills, etc. Until the VDC members become efficient and capable in all these skill areas it would be difficult to make the VDC sustainable. Extent of support of CSO in VDC management and performance of various activities by the VDC should be reduced gradually over a given period of time which should be long enough to complete nurturing. VDCs must have considerable funds with the provision of fund generation in future. VDCs have to take part in solving economic, social and political problems of the villagers. It needs to assume responsibility to provide credit support to the poor. VDCs must play an active role and assist villagers in identifying and mobilizing local resources and arrange to provide training to the villagers on resource management, occupational skill development, etc.

CSO staff opinions to make a VDC sustainable

VDCs must have clear vision and goal. VDCs must be registered. VDCs must have well documented policy procedures at least on administrative, accounting and financial issues. VDCs must be classified on the basis of some selected indicators that reflect the growth of the VDC as a grassroots organization.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

VDCs must have strong active leadership and the leadership in turn should be accountable to the general members of the VDCs. VDCs must be active in solving different problems of poor villagers. For this purpose, VDCs must have their own action plan and programs. VDCs must have sufficient funds and use the find for the greater interest of the villagers. VDCs must able to provide guidance and confidence to the poor villagers and be able to anticipate future problems and take necessary actions to help villagers in solving the problems. VDCs must maintain linkage and liaison with local institutions, government officials, etc. and participate in various local development activities.

PO staff opinions to make a VDC sustainable

VDCs must have capable individuals in the leadership and the leaders must be committed and responsible. VDC members should be provided with training on organization development and institution building. VDCs must have their own fund and provision for fund generation. They may need to provide savings and credit support to poor villagers. VDCs must have communication and interaction with the local government institutions like Union Parishod, Uapazila Parishad, etc. for mobilizing resources for the poor members. VDCs must have policies and procedures that are followed by all concerned who consider the policies and procedures as arbiter of any issue in the VDCs.

PAST staff opinions to make a VDC sustainable

VDCs must be involved in economic activities and undertake such activities as to generate funds for the running of the VDC. VDCs must give priority to the poor and the poorest of the poor. VDCs must be registered with the government preferably the Ministry of Social Welfare. VDCs should organize annual general meetings each year where they present they activities performed for the benefit of the poor villagers over the year.

Recommendations of the PMA Team (Gaibandha)

Having collected the opinions from the key stakeholders, the PMA team would like to make the following comments, observations and recommendations about the sustainability of the VDCs.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Relatively young generation should be brought to the forefront in VDCs and who should be provided with necessary training for capacity building. As a matter of fact, those VDCs have been found dynamic where relatively young people are in leadership positions. Emphasis should be placed on local fund raising for fund generation of the VDCs. All VDCs may think about starting savings, credit and income generation activities. SDF can encourage VDCs for starting various economic projects e.g. poultry, livestock and fish culture, etc VDCs must play an important role in employment generation of the poor people. A Central Committee should be formed at Union, Upazila and even at District level under the concept of federation through which collective strengths of the poor can be increased. VDCs must improve on and strengthen their practice in holding meetings regularly and maintaining transparency and accountability at all stages of their activities.

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

5.3. Annex 3

MONTHLY MEETING MINUTES

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

5.3.1 Monthly/Quarterly Coordination Meeting Minutes, Code no. MCM J- 6/January 2005, Jamalpur

mvk¨vj Bb fó g U cÖvMÖvg cÖ R± gvwmK Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbv mfvi Kvh©weeiYx, 02 Rvbyqvwi 2005 ¯ vbt CSO Awdm, Rvgvjcyi|

Rvgvjcyi Rjvi gvwmK Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbv mg ^q mfv MZ 2 Rvbyqvwi 2005 Zvwi L CSOÕi Uªwbs i g, Rvgvjcyi mì-G AbywôZ nq| mfvi Kvh©µg ïi nq mKvj 9.30 Uvq| mfvq g~jZt CSO, PAST, PO, HPO Ges TAT Gi wW m¤î 2004 gv mi Kv Ri AMÖMwZ, wewfb AwfÁZv I Rvbyqvwi 2005 gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv wb q Av jvPbv Kiv nq| CSO, PAST, PO, HPO Ges TAT cÖwZwbwa Zuv ì gvwmK AMÖMwZi Z_¨ wjwLZ AvKv i mfvq ck K ib| mfvq mfvcwZZ¡ K ib SDF-Gi Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Rbve gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb|

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 1. mve- PAST, PAST Gi c¶ _ K wUDeI qj mve-cÖ R ±i PAST: cÖ R± CSO wewfb Z_¨ Zz j aiv nq| Ìqvwbcvov wUDeI Ges weMZ mfv: MÖv gi qj SDF Ìqvwbcvovq wM q DcKvi fvMxi bv gi ZvwjKv wUDeI qj `L Z n e Ges mgm¨vi mgvav b cÖ qvRbxq mve-cÖ R ±i eë¯ v MÖnY Ki Z n e| DcKvi fvMxi `vwqZ¡: g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) SDF bv gi ZvwjKv GLbI Pzov nqwb| 5. Iv¯ v PAST, PAST cÖwZwbwa iv¯ v mve-cÖ R ±i me© kl CSO : evwbqv mve CSO cwimsL¨vb mfvq Zz j a ib| GQvov AviI D jL cvov MvÖ gi cÖ R± Ges K ib h: Aby`v bi SDF 1g eQi UvKv Rgv Ryb 2004 G ïi nIqv eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ 28wU Ìqv n q Q| iv¯ vi UvKv Qvo Ìqv n j iv¯ v givg Zi ¶wZMÖ¯ KvR ïi n e| iv¯ vi wel q wW m¤^ ii ci _ K CSO Gi CFMY cÖ_g 25wU ìLv¯ eQ ii MÖvg mg~ n _vK eb bv| wZwb cÖk I dig c~iY K i K ib, G Ae¯ vq eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ iv¯ v SDF G mg~n cyb: givg Zi Rb¨ MÖvgevmxM Yi cvVv bv Aby`v bi UvKv Rgv`vb wKfv e wbwðZ Kiv n q Q Ges n e? 3wU evKx 2q eQi Av Q| 2q eQ ii Rb¨ Kvb iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± c~e© G¨v cÖBR Kiv GLbI ïi nqwb| KvUvgwb SDF _ K cvIqv 57wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± MÖv gi iv¯ wewfb mgm¨vi Kvi Y cyb: g~j¨vq Yi Rb¨ vi welqwU SDF G diZ cvVv bv n q Q| myivnv nqwb| BDwbqb cwil ì QvocÎ Ges e¨w³MZ f~wgi PAST: ¶ Î Rwg n¯ v i cÖwµqvi meai bi d Zcyi

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ KvMRcÎ mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ v ei mv _ Rgv MÖv gi iv¯ Ìqv nqwb| vi KvR ïi Kiv cwðg SvjiPi MÖv g MªvgevmxM Yi Aby`v bi n q Q Ges UvKv 100 UvKv K i wba©viY K i Ìqv KvR Pj Q| n q Q| hv cÖ`vb Kiv A bK nZ`wi`ª cwiev i ZvivwUqv Rb¨ Kó mva¨| Mªv gi wel q CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, PAST gZvgZ Kv_vI Aby`v bi UvKv wba©viY K i Ìqv `q h, nqwb| ZvivwUqv CF M Yi mnvqZvq MÖvgevmxMY CAP Zix MÖv gi PMC K i Q wK iv¯ vi mve-cÖ R ±i bK&kv Zwi bZzb K i K i Qb CSO cÖ K kjxMY| d j, wKQy mgm¨v GKwU mve- m wó n Z cv i hv LyeB mvgvb¨| cÖ R± ÌqvbM Äi 6-7wU MÖv gi MÖvgevmxM Yi Proposal Aby`v bi UvKv e¨vs K Rgv Kiv n jI GLbI cvVv j ZLb G¨v cÖBR ïi nqwb| welqwU wb q SDF Gi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq h, h mg¯ wm×v iv¯ v AvswkKfv e wbg©v Yi ci eb¨vq bqv h Z ¶wZMÖ¯ n q Q m¸ jv Qvov 1g eQ ii mKj cv i| iv¯ v mve-cÖ R ±i UvKv Aegy³ Kiv n q Q| 2q SDF: SDF eQ ii 57wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± PAST _ K SDF- eivei G diZ cvIqv M Q| ZvivwUqv wm×v : MÖv gi 1. eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ iv¯ vi wbg©vY KvR wcGgwm mgvß Kivi Rb¨ MÖvgevmxM Yi Aby`v bi MÖvgevmxM 10% UvKv Rgv Ìqv bv n j SDF _ K UvKv Yi c ¶ GKwU Aegy³ Kiv m¤¢e n e bv| Av e`b 2. SvjiPi MÖv gi Aby`v bi welqwU LwZ q Rvbv e hv Z `L Z n e| mve-cÖ R± `vwqZ¡: CSO Replacement 3. PAST _ K h mg¯ iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± Gi K_v D jL SDF G diZ cvVv bv n q Q m¸ jv Z hw` _vK e| BDwbqb cwil ì QvocÎ Ges e¨w³MZ fywgi ¶ Î gvwj Ki Rwg n¯ v ii m¤§wZ Pzw³ Qvov Ab¨ Kvb mgm¨v bv _v K Zvn j G¨v cÖBR K i SDF G cvVv Z n e| Rwgi gvwjKvbv n¯ v ii wel q CSO cÖ qvRbxq eë¯ v MªnY Ki e| `vwqZ¡: PAST, CSO 4. 2q eQ ii iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± wb q m ó RwUjZv wbim Y PAST Ges CSO K wb q SDF KZ© c ¶i Dcw¯ wZ Z h _fv e 3iv wW m¤î Av jvPbv Kiv n e| weMZ mfv: evwbqv cvov MÖv gi Aby`vb msMÖ ni

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ welqwU 7 w` bi g a¨B wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST, CSO 15 B wW m¤^ ii g a¨ ¶wZMÖ¯ iv¯ vi wel q cÖwiZ ìLv¯ I dig c~iY K i SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 15B wW m¯ î 2004 Zvwi Li g a¨ d Zcyi MÖv gi iv¯ vi KvR ïi bv Ki j UvKv diZ w` Z n e| g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) G e¨vcv i PMC eivei wPwV w` eb| `vwqZ¡: SDF c~e© KvUvgwb MÖv gi iv¯ vi welqwU `ª Z myivnv Ki Z n e| cÖ qvR b ¯ vbxq Pqvig¨v bi mvnvh¨ wb Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO ZvivwUqv MÖv gi wbav©wiZ iv¯ v Qvov bZzb iv¯ v Kivi wel q CSO AvMÖn cÖKvk Ki jI PAST AbvMÖn cÖKvk K i| PMA GKwU Km wnmv e bqv h Z cv i e j mfvq gZvgZ `q| SDF, PAST Gi Dci welqwU Q o `q| 7. mve- PAST, PAST cÖwZwbwa KvjfvvU© mve-cÖ R ±i cÖ R± SDF eZ©gvb Ae¯ v mfvq Zz j a ib| KvjfvU© SDF Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, 13wU KvjfvU© mve- cÖ R ±i UvKv Aegy³ Kiv n q Q| 10wU mve- cÖ R ±i Bank Statement Ges ek wKQy mve- cÖ R ±i Pzw³ mv¶i nqwb weavq evKx 32wU mve-cÖ R ±i UvKv Qvo Ìqvq wej¤^ n Q| wm×v : 10B Rvbyqviwi g a¨ KvjfvvU© mve-cÖ R ±i mg~`q Pzw³ m¤úb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 9. Kv Ri CSO CSO Zv ì wW m¤î gv mi Kvh©vejxi we¯ CSO: iv¯ v AMÖM Ges vwiZ weeiY wjwLZ AvKv i ck K i Ges 2q eQ ii Ges mKj wZ SDF Kg© GjvKvi wKQy Z_¨ Zz j a i hv wbæi c: KvjfvU© mve- 190wU MÖv g VDC Ges PMC MVb m¤úb cÖ R± n q Q| cÖ¯ yZ kl 64 wU MÖv gi e¨vsK GKvD U Lvjv n q Q| nqwb| RLD 110wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± SDF G cvVv bv Uªwbs Gi n q Q | cÖ¯ wZ m¤úb weMZ mfv: n q Q wK wW m¤î gv mi g a¨ iv¯ v Ges KvjfvU© mve- Uªwbs ïi Kiv nqwb| cÖ R± cÖ¯ yZ kl n e Ges RLD Uªwbs ïi Kiv n e|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 14. wkLY I PO, wm×v : PO: 30 Rb wewbgq TAT, cÖwZwU gvwmK mfvq TAT Ges HPO K PÄ G R U HPO Zv ì wkLY mg~n wjwLZ AvKv i ck Ki Z m` mï Kvb& Ges n e| kªbxi SDF weMZ mfv: cÖwZwµqv 1. 30 Rb PÄ G R U m` mï Kvb& kªbxi wK Zv wjwLZ cÖwZwµqv wK Zv wjwLZ AvKv i SDF G AvKv i SDF G Rvbv Z n e| Rvbv bv 2. cieZ©x mfvq PO Ges SW- ì K Zv ì nqwb| gvVch©v qi wkLY wjwLZ AvKv i wb q POÕiv Zv ì Avm Z n e| wkLb wjwLZ AvKv i wb q Av mbwb| SW MY Zv ì wkLb ÎgvwmK mfvq wb q Avm eb| 15. Kv Ri PO I PO mfvq Zv ì PjwZ Ges weMZ gv mi Kvh©µ gi AMÖM SDF we¯ vwiZ weeiY wjwLZ AvKv i ck K ib Ges wZ Zv ch©v jvPbv K ib| 16. cÖwk¶Y PO I weMZ mfv: PO: I SDF `¶Zv Db qb cÖwk¶ Y VDC m`m¨ ì Dcw¯ wZ cÖwk¶ Yi Pvwn`v wbwðZ Ki Z n e| ïi Z VDC `vwqZ¡: PO m`mïv Dcw¯ Z _v Kb| 17. gvwmK CSO, mfvq SDF Rvb Z Pvq h cyivZb Ges bZzb VDC CSO, PO, HPO, mfv PO, mg~n wbqwgZfv e gvwmK mfv K i wiRywjDkb TAT: HPO, wjL Q wK bv, Ges 1g eQ ii VDC mg~ ni mfvq hZUv m¤¢e TAT I PO I CSO Kgx©iv h _fv e AskMÖnY K i mfvi PO, TAT, CSO SDF wiRywjDkb wjL Q wKbv? CSO Rvbvq h I HPO cÖwZwU VDC wbqwgZ Zv ì gvwmK mfv Ki Q| GK hv M wm×v t Dcw¯ Z _ K 1. KqwU wgwUs CSO Ges PO-i gvVKg©xiv VDC mfv h _fv e K i Q Zvi ZvwjKv AvMvgx 12B Ki Q| Rvbyqvix AbywôZe¨ ÎgvwmK mfvq Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PO weMZ mfv: TAT, HPO Ges PO-i gvVKg©xMY GK hv M VDC mfvq Dcw¯ Z _vK eb| 19. nZ CSO, weMZ mfv: D jwLZ `wi `ªi PO, SIPP Kvh©µ g CSO MÖv gi AvMªnx Ask K wel q Kvb ZvwjKv HPO, (MÖv gi wKQy Ask ev` `qv n qwQj) wb q mywbw©`ó TAT I KvR K iwQj| m mgq m¤ú~Y© MÖv gi Lvbvi m`yËi mfvi SDF Av jvPbvq 53

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ SDF ZvwjKv Zix K iwb| ZvB POÕi KvQ _ K TAT I Av jvPbvq HPO h nZ`wi `ªi ZvwjKv c q Q Zvi P q Av mwb| MÖv g nZ`wi `ªi msL¨v ekx| 39. E¨vsK CSO, K qKwU e¨vs K wewfb ARynvZ `wL q GKvD U PAST I wfwWwm/wcGgwmÕi GKvD U Lyj Z Pv Q bv| SDF wm×v : Kvb& e¨vs Ki Kvb& kvLv wK ai Yi ARynvZ `Lv Q Zvi weeiY, e¨vsK Ges kvLvi bvg mn AwZ kxNÖ SDF G Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 58. m¨vwbU PO I A bK MÖv gB MÖvgevmxMY wbR D `¨ M PO: ¯ ^íg~ j¨ ¨vwi SDF m¨vwbUvix j¨vwUªb Zix Ki Q| AvMvgx gvP© ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤§Z j¨vwUªb gv mi g a¨ K qKwU MÖvg 100% m¨vwb Uk bi cvqLvbv AvIZvq P j Avm e e j PO Avkv cÖKvk K i| wbg©v Yi Rb¨ SDFGi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, Kvb MÖvg K 100% PAST mnvqZv m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq Avbvi ci Zv SDF G Rvbv Z Ki Q wK n e| gvby li Af¨vm cwieZ©b GKwU mgq mv c¶ Rb¯ ^v¯ ¨ cÖ K kj e¨vcvi| hw` Zuv ì mvaviY m¨vwbUvix j¨vwUªb Awa`ß ii mv _ eënv i Af¨¯ Kiv bv hvq, Z e fwel¨ Z Zvuiv hvMv hvM wb R ì D `¨ MB AviI fvj m¨vwbUvix j¨vwUªb K iI Zv ì Zix I eënvi Ki eb e j Avkv Kiv hvq| mn hvwMZv weMZ mfv: cvIqv hv Qbv| 1. Rb¯ ^v¯ ¨ cÖ K kj Awa`ß ii mv _ hvMv hvM K i ¯ ^íg~ j¨ ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤§Z cvqLvbv wbg©v Yi cÖwk¶ Yi eë¯ v Ki Z n e| 2. m¨vwbUvix j¨wUªb Zixi cvkvcvwk Gi eënvi Ges nvZ avqv wbwðZ Ki Z n e| wm×v : - Rb¯ ^v¯ ¨ cÖ K kj Awa`ßi _ K mnvqZv bv Ki j cÖ qvR b UNO mv n ei mv _ hvMv hvM K i Zv ì mn hvwMZv wbwðZ Ki Z n e|

gj Z¨v Mi ci Ges Lvevi MÖn Yi c~ e© nvZ avqv wbwðZ Kivi Rb¨ ¯ vbxqfv e gwbUwis Gi e¨e¯ v Kivi welqwU PO cÖwZwbwa D jL K ib| hfv eB nvK cvqLvbv _ K Avmvi ci nvZ avqv wbwðZ Ki Z n e| cÖ qvR b mjd gwbUwis Gi dig¨vU Zix K i e¨envi Ki Z n e e j SDF-Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 64. PO Õi PO I weMZ mfv: PO: Kvh©µ SDF PO Õi Kvh©µ gi mgqmxgv e w× Ki Yi cª¯ wjwLZfv e gi vewU wW m¤î gv mi 20 Zvwi Li g a¨ SDF G cÖiY mgqmx wjwLZfv e SDF G cvVv Z n e| cÖ qvR b wek¦ Kiv nqwb| gv e w× e¨vs Ki mv _ GB wel q Av jvPbv Kiv n e| KiY 66. Kv Ri TAT, TAT weMZ Ges PjwZ gv mi Kvh©µg mg~n TAT: ¯ ^v¯ ¨ AMÖM HPO I mfvq Dc¯ vcY K i- welqK K¬vm wZi SDF 12 Rb `vBgv K cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n q Q Ges bIqvi ci d jv we iY Rvbyqvwi gv mi 10 Zvwi Li g a¨ AviI 3 Rb K Avc Kiv n Q cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n e| hv Z v¯ e KvVviwej MÖv gi 1 Rb MÖvg¨ Wv³vi K Zviv m¸ jv c¨v_jwRi (bb- gvB µv ¯ vwcK) Dci cÖwk¶Y Abykxjb K i| Ìqv n q Q| Rvbyqvwi gv m evnv`yivev` MÖv gi AviI 1 Rb MÖvg¨ Wv³vi K c¨v_jwRi (bb- gvB µv ¯ vwcK) Dci cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n e| 6wU wUD eKUwg Kiv n q Q| `vBgv Ges MÖvg Wv³vi cÖwk¶Yv_©x ì ZvwjKv Zix Kiv n q Q| Rvbyqvwi gvm _ K MÖvg¨ Wv³vi ì cÖwk¶Y Ìqv ïi n e| PO Gi Kvh©µ gi mv _ mg ^q mvab K i Kvh©µg ev¯ evqb Kiv nq| weMZ mfv : ¯ ^v¯ ¨ welqK K¬vm bIqvi ci d jvAvc Ki Z n e Ges `L Z n e cÖwk¶Yv_x©iv ev¯ e m¸ jv Abykxjb Ki Q wKbv| 67. wPwKr TAT, TAT Uxg wjWvi e jb h, nvwZfv½v BDwbq bi mv wd HPO I MZ wW m¤î gvm ch© wPwKrmv wd eve` MÖnY SDF cÖvß 729 UvKv 8wU MÖv gi VDC GKvD U Rgv Kiv n e| wm×v t nvwZfv½v BDwbq bi wPwKrmv wd eve` cÖvß 729 UvKv AvMvwg 7B Rvbyqvwii g a¨ mswkó MÖv gi VDC-i e¨vsK wnmv e Rgv Ki Z n e| 68. ¯ z j PO I weMZ mfv : PO: bZzb SDF SIPP Kvh©µ gi AvIZvf~³ cwievi mg~n _ K cÖÖwZwU QvÎ KqRb bZyb QvÎ QvÎx ¯ z j fwZ© nj Zvi ZvwjKv cwiev ii Q j- QvÎx PO Gi SW MY msi¶Y Ki eb| g q K hv Z fwZ© ¯ z j fwZ© wbwðZ Kiv nq Zv KiY evwo evwo cwi`k©Y K i wbwðZ Kiv n e| GB

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ Kvh©µg Rvbyqvwi _ K gvP© ch© Pj e| 70. wjM¨vj PO I PO Gi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq h, PO: wjM¨vj wK¬wb SDF cÖwZwU wjM¨vj wK¬wbK mk bi e¨vwßKvj wK¬wbK K ò _ K wZb N Uv ch© n q _v K| ev¯ evq bi wjM¨vj wK¬wbK mkb mg~n mvaviYZ ¯ y ji MvBWjvBb gvV, VDC m`m¨ ì evoxi DVv b n q _v K| Ges cÖvß Z_¨ Lvjv RvqMvq Ki j g q ì Dcw¯ wZ A bK SDF G ¶ Î Kg nq| cvVv bvi Rb¨ ïaygvÎ civgk© bv w` q eo ai Yi mgm¨vi ¶ Î cª¯ Z Kiv `wi`ª Mªvgevmx K Avw_©K mnvqZv cÖ`vb n Q| Kiv cÖ qvRb| 10 MÖvg _ K gvÎ GKRb K Avw_©K mnvqZv cÖ`vb ch©vß bq| Zzjbvg~jKfv e ÌqvbM Ä mgm¨v ekx wK hvZvqv Zi Amyweavi Kvi Y A bK ¶ ÎB MªvgevmxMY Zuv ì mgm¨v wb q Dc Rjv m` i Avm Z cv ib bv| hw` Av m, Zvn j PO GW fv KU Zuv ì cÖ qvRbxq mnvqZv cÖ`vb Ki Z cvi eb| wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µ gi KvwiKy¨jvg SDF G cvVv bv n q Q|

wjM¨vj wK¬wbK wel q SDF gZvgZ `q h, wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µg mg~n gy³ RvqMvq Ki Z n e| evoxi DVv b Ki j cÖfvekvjxiv hv Z `wi`ª `i Dci cÖfve we¯ vi Ki Z bv cv i m wel q bRi ivL Z n e| wm×v t wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µ g Kv_vI ekx mnvqZv cÖ`v bi cÖ qvRb `Lv w` j Zv SDF- G wPwV w` q Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µ gi gwWDj SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO weMZ mfv: wjM¨vj wK¬wbK ev¯ evq bi MvBWjvBb Ges cÖvß Z_¨ SDF-G cvVv Z n e|

ms kvab: mfvq Dcw¯ Z e¨w³eM©: TAT : KbmvjU¨v U I mKj mvk¨vj W fjc g U cvU©bvi|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report mfvi Av jvP¨ m~Px

1. wW m¤^i 2004 gv mi AMÖMwZ 2. Rvbyqvix 2005 gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv 3. weMZ gvm¸ jvi wkLb mfvq Dcw¯ Z e¨w³eM©

SDF : wRGg ( cªvMÖvg), GW&fvBRvi ( nj&_), g¨v bRvi (GgBGj), g¨v bRvi (m¨vc), g¨v bRvi (wmwW), g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) I g¨v bRvi (AvBwm)| CSO : cÖ R± Kv-AwW© bUi, mKj wdì mycvifvBRvi I BwÄwbqvi| PAST: wUg wjWvi, mvwmIjwRó, Gbfvqib g Uvj ¯ úkvwjó I wdì BwÄwbqvi| PO :cÖ R± KvAwW© bUi, GW& fv Kwm ¯ úkvwjó, KwgDwbwU W fjc g U ¯ úkvwj÷, ¯ §j ¯ j weR bm Wf jc g U ¯ úkvwjó I mKj cªvMÖvg AM©vbvBRvi| HPO : wdì g¨v bRvi| TAT : KbmvjU¨v U | PMA : jvK¨vj Uxg wjWvi, wmwbqi wimvm© Awdmvi I wimvm© Awdmvi|

(gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb) Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Gm wW Gd

weZiY 1/ SDF I TAT Gi mswkó Kg©KZ©ve ` 2/ mswk•ó CSO, PO, PAST, HPO I PMA Gi cÖwZwbwae `|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

10.3.2 Monthly/Quarterly Coordination Meeting Minutes, Code no. MCM J- 7/February 2005, Jamalpur

mvk¨vj Bb fó g U cÖvMÖvg cÖ R± gvwmK Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbv mfvi Kvh©weeiYx, 09-10 deª qvwi 2005 ¯ vbt CSO Ges PO Awdm, Rvgvjcyi|

Rvgvjcyi Rjvi gvwmK Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbvi mg ^q mfv MZ 9 I10B deª qvix 2005 G CSO Ges POÕi Uªwbs i g, Rvgvjcyi mì G AbywôZ nq| mfvi Kvh©µg ïi nq mKvj 9.30 Uvq| mfvq g~jZt CSO, PAST, PO, HPO Ges TAT Gi Rvbyqvwi 2005 gv mi Kv Ri AMÖMwZ, wewfb AwfÁZv I deª qvix 2005 gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv wb q Av jvPbv Kiv nq| CSO, PAST, PO, HPO, Ges TAT cÖwZwbwa Zuv ì gvwmK AMÖMwZi Z_¨ wjwLZ AvKv iI mfvq ck K ib| G Qvov PMA Zv ì wW m¤î I Rvbyqvix gv mi NFR Gi wewfb Bmy¨ wb q Av jvPbv K ib| mfvq mfvcwZZ¡ K ib SDF-Gi Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Rbve gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb|

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 1. mve- PAST, PMA Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, bvwi Kjx MÖv gi PAST I SDF: cÖ R± CSO PMC Zv ì PviwU wUDeI q ji DcKvi fvMxi Ìqvwbcvov wUDeI Ges bv gi ZvwjKv cwieZ©b K i bZzb bv g MÖv gi qj SDF wUDeI qj emv bvi cª¯ ve Ki Q| wUDeI qj mve- wm×v : cÖ R ±i c~ e©i ZvwjKv Abyhvqx wUDeI qj emv Z DcKvi fvMxi n e| bv gi ZvwjKv Ìqvwbcvovq wM q DcKvi fvMxi bv gi GLbI Pzov ZvwjKv `L Z n e Ges MÖvgevmxM Yi nqwb| mv _ Av jvPbv K i DcKvi fvMxi bv gi ZvwjKv Pzov Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) SDF, PAST weMZ mfv: Ìqvwbcvovq wM q DcKvi fvMxi bv gi ZvwjKv `L Z n e Ges mgm¨vi mgvav b cÖ qvRbxq eë¯ v MÖnY Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: SDF I PAST 5. iv¯ v PAST, 1g eQi CSO : mve CSO CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h: 1. eb¨vq cÖ R± Ges eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ 28wU iv¯ vi g a¨ 22wU ¶wZMÖ¯ SDF iv¯ vi Bank statement Rgv Ìqv n q Q| iv¯ v mg~ ni ZvivwUqv MvÖ gi bZzb iv¯ vi mve-cÖ R± Rb¨ cÖ¯ ve Rgv Ìqv n q Q| MÖvgevmxM 2q eQi Yi Aby`v bi 10% UvKv Rgv PAST Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h: Ìqv n q Q| 2q eQ ii 113 wU mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ ve 2. SvjiPi cvIqv M Q| MÖv gi 58

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 4 wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± G¨v cÖBR Kiv MÖvgevmxMY n q Q Ges deª qvix gv mi g a¨ AviI 40 GK Î e m wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± G¨v cÖBR Kiv wm×v m¤¢e n e| MÖnY K ib h kªxcyi BDwbq bi fvjyKv Mªv gi cÖ¯ vweZ cÖ Z¨ K iv¯ v mve-cÖ R±wU BDwbqb cwil ì MÖvgevmx 100 Db qb Kvh©µ gi ZvwjKvfy³| UvKv K i Pvu`v nvqvZcyi Ges evBUKvgvix MÖv gi cÖ¯ w` eb| Z e GB vweZ iv¯ v mve-cÖ R ±i wKQy Ask wm×v e¨w³MZ RvqMvq covi d j RwUjZv m wó Ae¯ vi n Q| cwi cÖw¶ Z SDF Gi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq h: cwieZ©b mKj iv¯ v mve-cÖ R ±i ZvwjKv mswkó hvM¨| BDwbqb cwil ` Ìqvi e¨cv i wm×v 3. ZvivwUqv M nxZ n jI Ìqv nqwb| MÖv gi PMC e¨w³MZ Rwg Z Kvb mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ ve bZzb K i Kiv hv ebv, GB e¨cv i wm×v M nxZ n jI GKwU mve- Zv AbymiY Kiv nqwb d j GB ai Yi RwUjZv cÖ R± Proposal m wó n Q| Rgv w` q Q| wm×v : 4. c~e©- 1g eQ i h mg¯ MÖv g gv Si Ask dvuKv KzUvgwb i L `ycv k iv¯ v Kiv n qwQj m mg¯ MÖv gi iv¯ vi ZvwjKv Zix Ki Z n e| welqwU wb q `vwqZ¡: g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) SDF ¯ vbxq c~e© KvUvgwb MÖv gi 25 Rb nZ`wi `ªi Pqvig¨v bi KvQ _ K 500 UvKv K i Pvu`v bIqvi mwnZ welqwU we¯ vwiZ ch©v jvPbv K i Av jvPbv mgvav bi eë¯ v wb Z n e| n q Q| `vwqZ¡: PMA, CSO MÖvgevmxMY 2q eQ ii h mg¯ MÖvg 100% Aby`v bi `ª Z myivnv UvKv Rgv K i Q, m MÖvg mg~n iv¯ vi Ki e| Kv Ri Rb¨ avb jvMv bv eÜ i L Q| H mKj MÖv g mve-cÖ R± cÖ_ g G¨v cÖBR Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST 1g eQ ii h me MÖv g bZzb mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ ve Kiv n q Q m me mve-cÖ R± mg~n `ª Z G¨v cÖBR Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST iv¯ vi KvR ïi Kivi mgq Kgc ¶ 50 Rb MÖvgevmxi Dcw¯ wZ Z AvbyôvwbKfv e Kv Ri we¯ vwiZ weeiY MªvgevmxM Yi mvg b Dc¯ vcY K i KvR ïi Ki Z n e| ev¯ evqb KvR mgvß n j cyYivq MÖvgevmxM Yi wbKU Kv Ri mg¯

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ wnmve mswkó PMC, VDC Ges MÖvgevmxM Yi m¤§y L AvbyôvwbKfv e ck Ki Z n e| hw` D Øvabx Abyôv b Kgc ¶ 50 Rb MÖvgevmx Dcw¯ Z bv _v K Zvn j KvR ïi Kiv n e bv| `vwqZ¡: PAST, CSO MÖvgevmxMY Aby`v bi UvKv e¨vs K Rgv Ki j cÖ_g wKw¯ i UvKv Qvo Kiv n e| KLb _ K KvR ïi Kiv n e m wel q MÖvgevmxMY wm×v wb eb Z e eb¨vi welqwU gv_vq ivL Z n e KviY 2q eQ ii Kvb iv¯ v eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ n j SDF _ K Kvb AwZwi³ eiv× cÖ`vb Kiv n e bv| ZvB KvR ïi Kivi mgq Aek¨B wbwðZ n Z n e, KLb ev KZw` b ev¯ evqb mgvß Kiv hv e| weMZ mfv: 5. eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ iv¯ vi MÖvgevmxM Yi Aby`v bi 10% UvKv Rgv Ìqv bv n j SDF _ K UvKv Qvo Kiv n e bv| 6. SvjiPi MÖv gi Aby`v bi welqwU LwZ q `L Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 7. SDF eivei ZvivwUqv MÖv gi wcGgwm MÖvgevmxM Yi c ¶ GKwU Av e`b Rvbv e hv Z mve-cÖ R± Replacement Gi K_v D jL _vK e| `vwqZ¡: PAST I CSO 8. c~e© KvUvgwb MÖv gi iv¯ vi welqwU `ª Z myivnv Ki Z n e| cÖ qvR b ¯ vbxq Pqvig¨v bi mvnvh¨ wb Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 7. mve- PAST, 1g eQi CSO: cÖ R± SDF CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h: 7wU KvjfvvU© KvjfvU© 7wU KvjfvU© mve-cÖ R ±i Pzw³ GLbI mve-cÖ R ±i m¤úb nqwb| Pzw³ ¯ ^v¶i 3wU MÖv gi Rb¨ bZzb K i KvjfvvU© mve- evKx A Q| cÖ R± Rgv Ìqv n q Q| 2q eQi PAST Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h: w`MZcvBZ BDwbq bi bqvcvov Ges ne `k MÖv gi MÖvgevmxM Yi e· Kvjfv U©I Pvwn`v _vK j n jI ev R Ui Kvi Y Zv cwieZ©b K i cvBc KvjfvU© Ìqv n q Q| 1g eQi GKwU e· KvjfvU© G¨v cÖBR Kiv n jI ev RU ekx nIqvi Kvi Y SDF _ K

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ Aby gv`b `Iqv nqwb|

wm×v : deª qvix 2005 Gi 12 Zvwi Li g a¨ 1g eQ ii evKx KvjfvU© mg~ ni Pzw³ ¯ ^v¶i m¤úb bv n j m¸wji KvR eÜ K i `Iqv n e| h mg¯ RvqMvq e· KvjfvU© Kiv cÖ qvRb m¸wj ev¯ evqb Kivi Rb¨ SDF _ K LGED Gi mv _ hvMv hvM Kiv n e| hw` wba©vwiZ ev R Ui P q GK `yB jvL UvKv ekx e¨q K i e· KvjfvU© Kiv m¤¢e nq Z e m ¶ Î PAST G¨v cÖBR Ki Z cv i| `vwqZ¡: SDF, PAST h mg¯ iv¯ vq ev RU mxgve×Zvi Rb¨ e· KvjfvU© Kiv m¤¢e n e bv mLv b iv¯ vi KvR KZUv Kvh©Ki n e| Zvi cÖ qvRbxqZv wb q MÖvgevmxi mv _ K_v ej Z n e| m ¶ Î MÖvgevmxMY B Qv Ki j bZzb mve-cÖ R ±i Rb¨ cÖ¯ ve Ki Z cv ib| `vwqZ¡: SDF, CSO, PAST 1g eQ ii wZbwU MÖv gi bZzb K i cÖ¯ veK Z KvjfvU© mve-cÖ R± mg~n G¨v cÖBR Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST weMZ mfv: 10B Rvbyqviwi g a¨ KvjfvvU© mve-cÖ R ±i mgy`q Pzw³ m¤úb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 9. Kv Ri CSO CSO Zv `i Rvbyqvix gv mi Kvh©vejxi we¯ CSO: RLD AMÖM Ges vwiZ weeiY wjwLZ AvKv i ck K ib Ges wKQy Uªwbs ïi Kiv wZ SDF Z_¨ Zz j a ib hv wbæi c: nqwb| Uªwbs 190 wU MÖv g VDC Ges PMC MVb Gi cÖ¯ wZ m¤úb n q Q| m¤úb n q Q 110 wU MÖv gi e¨vsK GKvD U Lvjv Ges G gv mB n q Q| ïi n e 100% Aby`vb Rgv Kiv n q Q 36wU MÖv g| 150wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± SDF G cvVv bv n q Q | KwgDwbwU mve-cÖ R± Kivi Rb¨ cÖ Z¨K mycvifvBRvi 3wU K i MÖvg wbe©vPb K i KvR Ki Q| AvMvgx gv m Gi djvdj cvIqv hv e| wm×v : mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ v ei wi cvU© mswkó

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ UNO mv ne K w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO wek¦ e¨s Ki civgk© g Z h mg¯ MÖvg mg~ n PMC mgm¨v Ki Q, mLv b VDC Gi gva¨ g cix¶vg~jKfv e mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evq bi KvR Kiv h Z cv i| cÖ qvR b VDC Zvi Aax b GKwU mve-KwgwU MVb K i wb Z cv i | `vwqZ¡: CSO weMZ mfv: wW m¤î gvm _ K RLD Uªwbs ïi Kiv n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 14. wkLY I PO, PO Gi cÖvMÖvg AM©vbvBRviMY Zv ì PO : SDF wjwLZ wewbgq TAT, wewfb wkLY mfvq ck K ib: AvKv i HPO cÖvMÖvg AM©vbvBRvi (jw¶iPi BDwbqb) Rvbv bv Ges Rbve Avãyi ivwKe: gvbe Db qb cÖwk¶Y n q Q| SDF Kg©kvjv _ K DrmvwnZ n q iRbx MÜ¨v, ejx, nvøv nbv ` ji m`m¨MY Zv ì wb R ì ` j mÂq ïi K i Q| ejx, nvøv nbv ` ji m`mïv Zv ì wb R ì mÂqK Z A_© _ K m`m¨ ì gv S FY Kvh©µg ïi K i Qb| cÖvMÖvg AM©vbvBRvi (nvwZfv½v BDwbqb) Rbve gv: gne Z: cÖwk¶Y mg~ n GKB welq evievi Av jvPbv nIqvi d j MÖvgevmxMY A bK mgq cÖwk¶ Y AskMÖnY Ki Z AbvMÖn cÖKvk K ib| ZvQvov Ab¨ h mg¯ NGO, SIPP AvIZvfy³ MÖvg mg~ n KvR Ki Q m mg¯ NGO Zv ì wewfb Kvh©µ g AskMÖn Yi Rb¨ MÖvgevmxMY K fvZv cÖ`vb K i| d j wewfb RvqMvq MÖvgevmxMY SIPP Kvh©µ g AskMÖn Yi Rb¨ fvZv `vex Ki Qb| cÖvMÖvg AM©vbvBRvi ( K `yqv BDwbqb) Rbve gv: BKevj: AvMvgx g 2005 Gi g a¨ mvbvKvZv MÖvg 100% m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq P j Avm e| Lvjv RvqMvq cvqLvbv Kiv eÜ Kivi Rb¨ mvbvKvZv MÖv g 7 m` mï GKwU KwgwU MVb Kiv n q Q| cvkcvwk ¯ zjMvgx Q j g q ì wb q 18 m` mï GKwU evuwk KwgwU MVb Kiv n q Q| cÖvMÖvg AM©vbvBRvi (wPKvRvwb BDwbqb) Rbve gv: bvwRg: hvZvqvZ eë¯ ¨vi Amyweavi Kvi Y Lvjvevox 62

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ MÖvgevmxMY j¨vwUªb Zixi wis Ges ¯ ¨ve cwienY Ki Z cvi Qb bv| G Av jvPbvi cwi cÖw¶ Z SDF _ K ejv nq h, - wewfb ai Yi mgm¨v _vK eB G¸wj K Rq K iB KvR Ki Z n e| - g 2004 G mvbvKvZv MÖvgevmxMY wm×v wb qwQ jb h AvMvgx wZb gv mi g a¨ Zuviv Zuv ì MÖvg K 100% m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq wb q Avm eb wK Zuviv mdj n Z cv ibwb| GLb h nZz MÖvgevmxMY AviI mgq Pv Q ZvB GB Kvh©µ gi ev¯ evqb mnR n e wK-bv m e¨vcv i m `n Av Q| mwVKfv e ev¯ evqb Ki Z n j G wel q POÕi Kg©x Ì we klfv e bRi ivL Z n e| - ` ji m`m¨ ì mÂqK Z UvKv hv Z mwVKfv e jb `b nq Zv mZK©Zvi mv _ ch© e¶Y Ki Z n e| - B QvB eo kw³, hw` MÖvgevmxMY Av wiK nb Zvn j hvZvqvZ eë¯ ¨v Livc _vK jI Zviv Zv ì wis Ges ¯ve mg~n cwienb Ki Z cvi eb|

weMZ mfv: 30 Rb PÄ G R U m` mï Kvb& kªbxi cÖwZwµqv wK Zv wjwLZ AvKv i SDF G Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 15. Kv Ri PO I PO mfvq Zv ì PjwZ Ges weMZ gv mi AMÖM SDF Kvh©µ gi wZ we¯ vwiZ weeiY wjwLZ AvKv i ck K ib Ges Zv Zz j a ib| 16. cÖwk¶Y PO I PO: I SDF PO cÖwZwbwa e jb, Pvwn`v GB ch© 440 Rb K `¶Zv Db qb cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n q Q| wek¦ e¨vs Ki civgk© Abyhvqx bZzb Uª Wi wel q KvR Kiv n q Q wK bZzb ai Yi Kvb UªW GLbI cvIqv hvqwb| Z e Póv Ae¨vnZ Av Q| wm×v t bZzb ai Yi Kvb UªW bv cvIqvi welqwU D jL K i gv K©U mv f© wi cvU© Zix Ki Z n e| wi cv U© UªW wbe©vP bi ¶ Î h h welq we ePbv Kiv n q Q Zv D jL Ki Z n e|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ `vwqZ¡: PO

PMA: PMA cÖwZwbwa `¶Zv Db qb cÖwk¶Y MÖnYKvix ì Rb¨ cÖwk¶K KZ ©K wba©vwiZ wel qi Rb¨ n¨vÛ AvDU cÖ`v bi welqwU DÌvcY K ib| wm×v : cÖwZwU cÖwk¶ Yi wel qi Dci n¨vÛ AvDU cÖ`vb Ki Z n e Ges Zv mswkó VDC msi¶Y Ki e| `vwqZ¡: PO 17. gvwmK CSO, SDF Gi GK cÖ k i Rev e CSO Rvbvq h, CSO: mfv PO, cÖwZwU bZzb VDC wbqwgZ Zv ì gvwmK mfv VDC mfvq CSO HPO, Ki Q Ges Zv ì iRy¨ jkb wjL Q| Ges PO Õi TAT I weMZ mfv: h _fv e SDF KqwU wgwUs CSO Ges PO-i gvVKg©xiv Dcw¯ Z nIqvi h _fve K i Q Zvi ZvwjKv AvMvgx 12B ZvwjKv Rvbyqvix AbywôZe¨ ÎgvwmK mfvq Rvbv Z ÎgvwmK mfvq n e| SDF G cÖ`vb `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PO Kiv n q Q| 18. evj¨ PO I PO Gi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq h, MZ gvm weevn I SDF ch© cÖKí GjvKvq 10wU h ZzK wenxY h ZzK we q m¤úb n q Q| wm×v : h ZzK Qvov AbywôZ we q mg~ ni we¯ vwiZ weeiY SDF G wjwLZfv e Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 19. nZ CSO, PMA: `wi `ªi PO, PMA cÖwZwbwa e jb h, HPO Ges TAT hw` ZvwjKv HPO, bZzb K i nZ `wi `ªi ZvwjKv Zix K i Zvn j PO TAT I h ZvwjKv AbymiY K i KvR Ki Q Zvi mv _ SDF RwUjZv m wó n e| KviY HPO Ges TAT KvR Ki Q mg¯ MÖvg wb q wK PO KvR Ki Q MÖv gi wbe©vwPZ Ask wb q| wm×v : PO MÖv gi h Ask wb q KvR Ki Q HPO Ges TAT m Ask wb qB KvR Ki e| `vwqZ¡: TAT, HPO

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 25. bvUK PO I PO cÖwZwbwa e jb h, MZ gv m Zv ì 6wU SDF c_ bvUK Kivi cwiKíYv _vK jI 4wU Kiv m¤¢e n q Q| SDF Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, bvU Ki g~j welqe¯ MÖvgevmxMY KZUv g b ivL Z cvi Q mUv ch© e¶Y Ki Z n e| wm×v : MÖvgevmxMY bvU Ki g~j welqe¯ KZUv g b ivL Z cvi Q Ges Zv ì cÖwZwµqv wK Zv ` L AMvgx mfvq ck Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PMA 36. mvgvw CSO CSO cÖwZwbwa e jb: RK ØÜ Ges ÌqvbMÄ Dc Rjvi Wvsaiv BDwbq bi SDF Usivgvix Ges AvK ` cvov MÖv g mvgvwRK Ø î Kvi Y KvR Ki Z mgm¨v n Q| 1g eQ ii MÖvg mg~ n VDC Ges PMC Gi g a¨ Ø ^ `Lv w` Q| c~e© Lvjvevox MÖv gi mgm¨v mgvavb n q Q, wK wKQy MÖv g Kv Ri wnmve wb q Ø ^ `Lv w` Q| PMC KZ ©K VDC I MÖvgevmx ì wbKU Kv Ri wnmve bv Ìqvi d j GB RwUjZv m wó n Q| wm×v : 1| Ø ^ wbim bi Rb¨ PMC, VDC I MÖvgevmx ì mfv WvK Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 2| 2q eQ ii MÖv g PMC MV b mgm¨v `Lv w` j Rbmfv K i MÖvgevmxMY K Rvwb q mB mg¯ MÖvg cªKí _ K ev` w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 39. e¨vsK CSO, weMZ mfv: CSO: GKvD U PAST I Kvb e¨vs Ki Kvb kvLv wK ai Yi ARynvZ e¨vsK GKvD U SDF `Lv Q Zvi weeiY e¨vsK Ges kvLvi bvg mn Lvjv wb q m ó AwZ kxNÖ SDF G Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO RwUjZvi mgvavb n q Q| 58. m¨vwbU PO I SDF cÖwZwbwa Rvb Z Pvb cÖKí GjvKvq Ggb ¨vwi SDF Kvb MÖvg Av Q hLv b Lvjv RvqMvq j¨vwUªb cvqLvbv Kiv nq bv| PO cÖwZwbwa e jb, gvP© 2005 Gi g a¨ d Zcyi MÖvg K 100% m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq Avbv m¤¢e n e| j¶xiPi BDwbq bi MÖvg mg~n K 100% m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq Avbvi Rb¨ MÖvgevmxM Yi M nxZ Kvh©µg A_©vfv e ev¯ evqb Ki Z cvi Q bv|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ miKv ii m¨vwb Ukb cÖK íi Rb¨ eivÏK Z A_© SIPP AvIZvf~³ MÖvg mg~ n cÖ`vb Kivi Rb¨ UNO (mì) mv n ei mv _ hvMv hvM Kiv n q Q| wm×v t me©v MÖ `L Z n e MÖvgevmxMY m¨vwbUvix j¨vwUªb Zix I eënvi Ki Q wKbv, cÖ qvR b Gi eënvi wbwðZ Kivi Rb¨ Kvh©Ki c` ¶c MÖnY Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 66. Kv Ri TAT, HPO cÖwZwbwa weMZ Ges PjwZ gv mi AMÖM HPO I Kvh©µg mg~n mfvq wjwLZ AvKv i Dc¯ vcY wZi SDF K ib| we iY 67. wPwKr TAT, TAT Uxg wjWvi e jb h: TAT: VDC Zv ì mv wd HPO I TAT MÖvgevmxM Yi KvQ _ K wPwKrmv e¨vsK wnmv e MÖnY SDF wd eve` cÖvß UvKv mswkó MÖv gi VDC Rgv Ki Q| GKvD U Rgv Kiv n q Q| HPO GLb ch© Zv ì Kg© GjvKvi MÖvgevmxM Yi KvQ _ K wPwKrmv wd eve` cÖvß UvKv mswkó MÖv gi VDC GKvD U Rgv K iwb| wfwWwmi eZ©gvb GKvD U `~ieZx© e¨vs K| D³ e¨vs K wPwKrmv wdÕi UvKv Rgv w` Z M j hvZvqZ e¨q AwaK nq| ZvB Zvuiv wbKUeZ©x K wl e¨vs K UvKv Rgv w` Z B QyK| wm×v t TAT _ K SDF eivei wPwV w` q Rvbv Z n e hv Z SDF mswkó K wl e¨vs K wPwV w` q TAT Ges HPO K mnvqZv Kivi welqwU wbwðZ K i| `vwqZ¡: TAT

weMZ mfvt nvwZfv½v BDwbq bi wPwKrmv wd eve` cÖvß 729 UvKv AvMvwg 7B Rvbyqvwii g a¨ mswkó MÖv gi VDC-i e¨vsK wnmv e Rgv Ki Z n e| 68. ¯ z j PO I PO cÖwZwbwa e jb, 39 Rb Drop out bZzb SDF Q j g q cybivq ¯ ~ j fwZ© n q Q| Gi g a¨ 2 QvÎ Rb gvbwmK Ges 1 Rb kvwiixK cÖwZeÜx| QvÎx SDF cÖwZwbwa e jb, Q j g q `i wbqwgZ fwZ© ¯ z j cvVv bv Ges cov kvbvi wel q wbwðZ AwfeveK `i gv S m PZbZv m wó Ki Z n e| KiY 66

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ KiY wm×v t Drop out Q j g q hviv ¯ z j fwZ© n q Q Zviv wbqwgZ ¯ z j Avm Q wKbv Zv d jvAvc Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 70. wjM¨vj PO I PO Gi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq h, PO: wK¬wb SDF TOR Abyhvqx cÖ_g eQ i cÖwZwU MÖv g wjM¨vj wK¬wbK K `yevi wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µg m¤úb ev¯ evq bi n q Q| MvBWjvBb Ges eZ©gv b 55-60% MÖvgevmx AvBb Ges wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Zv ì b¨vh¨ AwaKvi m¤ú K© m PZb| Kvh©µ g wm×v t Kv_vI ekx wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µg ev¯ evq bi we¯ mnvqZv vwiZ weeiY wjwLZ AvKv i SDF G cvVv Z cÖ`v bi n e| cÖ qvRbxqZvi `vwqZ¡: PO wel q cÖvß Z_¨ weMZ mfv: SDF G wjM¨vj wK¬wbK ev¯ evq bi MvBWjvBb Ges cvVv bvi Rb¨ wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µ g Kv_vI ekx cª¯ Z Kiv n Q| mnvqZv cÖ`v bi cÖ qvRb `Lv w` j Zv SDF G wPwV w` q Rvbv Z n e| 71. nvZ PO I PO cÖwZwbwa e jb h, PO: avIqv SDF cÖvq 500 cwievi Lvevi Av M cvwb w` q mjd gwbUwis nvZ cwi¯ vi K ib| Gi di gU Zix `wi`ªZvi Kvi Y Zviv mvevb eënvi Ki Z Kiv nqwb| cvi Qb bv| cvqLvbv _ K Avmvi ci 50% MÖvgevmx mvevb/QvB w` q nvZ cwi¯ vi K ib| weMZ mfv: h fv eB nvK cvqLvbv _ K Avmvi ci nvZ avqv wbwðZ Ki Z n e| cÖ qvR b mjd gwbUwis Gi di gU Zix K i eënvi Ki Z n e| 72. ¯ ^v¯ ¨ PO, PO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, ¯ ^v¯ ¨ welqK welqK HPO, wewfb Kg©m~Px FWC Ges FFA MY K Kg©m~ TAT I Px SDF mv _ wb q ev¯ evqb Kiv n Q| wm×v t 7 eQ ii NID Kg©m~Pxi we¯ vwiZ weeiY msMÖn Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO HPO Ges TAT TAT cÖwZwbwa e jb, cÖKí GjvKvi cÖwZwU ¯ z j gv m Kgc ¶ `yBevi ¯ ^v¯ ¨ wk¶v welqK K¬vm bIqv nq Ges d jv Avc Kiv nq| 73. Rb¥/g Z PO, SDF cÖwZwbwa e jb h, PO Ges HPO z¨ HPO, KZ©©© K cª`vbK Z Rb¥ wbewÜKiY ZvwjKvq wbewÜ TAT I cv_©K¨ Av Q| 67

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ wbewÜ TAT I cv_©K¨ Av Q| KiY SDF D jwLZ wel q PO cÖwZwbwa e jb, HPO KZ© K msi¶Y Kiv n Q mg¯ MÖv gi ZvwjKv Aciw` K PO msi¶Y Ki Q ïay gvÎ nZ `wi`ª cwievi mg~ ni ZvwjKv d j GB ZviZg¨ `Lv w` q Q| 74. wfwË HPO, HPO cÖwZwbwa D jL K ib: Rwic TAT I wfwË Rwic Kvh©µg MZ Rvbyqvix gv m kl SDF nevi cwiKíYv _vK jI kl Kiv m¤¢e nqwb| deª qvix 2005 Gi 15 Zvwi Li g a¨ wfwË Rwi ci evKx KvR m¤úb n e Ges cÖvß Z_¨ mfv K i MÖvgevmxM Yi m¤§y L ck Kiv n e| wm×v t mfvi ZvwiL SDF G Rvbv Z n e Ges m¤¢e n j SDF Gi cÖwZwbwa mfvq Ask MÖnY Ki eb| 75. PRA HPO, PMA cÖwZwbwa e jb h: Kvh©µg TAT I HPO Ges TAT cÖ_ g MÖvg Ges ciewZ© Z SDF cvov wfwËK PRA Kvh©µg cwiPvjbv Ki Q| PviwU Kvh©µ gi g a¨ Health Hazard Qvov evKx wZbwU Kvh©µg cvov wfwËK Kiv KZUv Kvh©Ki, Zv cix¶v Kiv cÖ qvRb| wm×v t HPO Ges TAT PviwU Kvh©µ gi MÖvg Ges cvov wfwËK Ki e Ges Zv Z wKi c cv_©K¨ `Lv hvq Zv ciewZ© mfvq Zv ck Ki e| `vwqZ¡: HPO, TAT 76. Z_¨ PO I PMA cÖwZwbwa Z_¨ cÖev ni Î wUi Kvi Y cÖevn SDF MÖvgevmxi gv S m ó RwUjZvi welqwU Zz j a ib| wm×v t SDF Gi cÖPwjZ bxwZgvjvi evB i Kvb K_v gvV ch©v q ejv hv e bv Ges GB wel q fwelr G mevB K hZ kxj n Z n e| ms kvab: µg bs: 70, wjM¨vj wK¬wbK: wjM¨vj wK¬wb Ki Kvh©µ gi gwWDj SDF G cvVv Z n e| Gi ¯ j - wjM¨vj wK¬wb Ki Kvh©µ gi MvBW jvBb SDF G cvVv Z n e

mfvi Av jvP¨ m~Px

4. Rvbyqvix 2005 gv mi AMÖMwZ 5 deª qvix 2005 gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv 5. weMZ gvm¸ jvi wkLb

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

SDF : wRGg ( cªvMÖvg), g¨v bRvi (m¨vc), g¨v bRvi (wmwW) I g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj), | CSO : cÖ R± Kv-AwW© bUi, mKj wdì mycvifvBRvi I BwÄwbqvi PO : (1g eQi): cÖ R± KvAwW© bUi, KwgDwbwU W fjc g U ¯ úkvwjó, ¯ §j ¯ j weR bm Wf jc g U ¯ úkvwjó I mKj cªvMÖvg AM©vbvBRvi| PAST: wUg wjWvi I wdì BwÄwbqvi| HPO : wdì g¨v bRvi| TAT : KbmvjU¨v U | PO: (2q eQi): cÖ R± KvAwW© bU| PMA : wmwbqi wimvm© Awdmvi I wimvm© Awdmvi|

(gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb) Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Gm wW Gd

weZiY 1/ SDF I TAT Gi mswkó Kg©KZ©ve ` 2/ mswk•ó CSO, PO, PAST, HPO I PMA Gi cÖwZwbwae `|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

10.3.3 Monthly/Quarterly Coordination Meeting Minutes, Code no. MCM J-8/March 2005, Jamalpur

Rvgvjcyi Rjvi gvwmK Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbvi mg ^q mfv MZ 07B gvP© 2005 G CSOÕi Uªwbs i g Ges 2q eQ ii PO Õi (ESDO) Awdm K ¶, Rvgvjcyi mì, AbywôZ nq| mfvi Kvh©µg ïi nq mKvj 9 Uvq| 08B gvP© 2005 G 1g eQ ii POÕi Uªwbs i g, Rvgvjcyi mÌ, G AbywôZ nq| mfvi Kvh©µg ïi nq mKvj 10.00 Uvq| mfvq g~jZt CSO, PAST, PO, HPO Ges TAT Gi deª qvix 2005 gv mi Kv Ri AMÖMwZ, wewfb AwfÁZv I gvP© 2005 gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv wb q Av jvPbv Kiv nq| CSO, PAST, PO, HPO, Ges TAT cÖwZwbwa Zuv ì gvwmK AMÖMwZi Z_¨ wjwLZ AvKv iI mfvq ck K ib| G Qvov PMA Zv ì deª qvix gv mi NFR Gi wewfb Bmy¨ wb q Av jvPbv K ib| mfvq mfvcwZZ¡ K ib SDF-Gi Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Rbve gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb|

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 1. mve- PAST, PAST Rvbvq h, PAST: bvwi Kjx cÖ R± Ges bvwi Kjx MÖv g c~ e©i ZvwjKv Abyhvqx MÖv g wUDeI SDF wUDeI qj emv bvi wel q SDF _ K wPwV weZwK©Z 4wU qj Ìqv n jI GLbI Zv emv bv nqwb| wUDeI qj GLbI B Ui `vg e w×i Kvi Y 12wU MÖv g emv bv nqwb| wUDeI q ji cvUdig GLbI cvKv nqwb e j wcGgwm m`m¨MY Rvbvq| Ìqvwb cvovq DcKvi fvMxi wm×v : h mg¯ MÖvg GLbI wUDeI q ji bv gi ZvwjKv cvUdig cvKv Ki Yi KvR ïi K iwb Zvi ZvwjKv P~ov n q Q w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST Ges kxNÖB weMZ mfv: Pzw³ ¯ ^v¶i n e| bvwi Kjx MÖv g c~ e©i ZvwjKv Abyhvqx wUDeI qj emv Z n e| Ìqvwbcvovq wM q DcKvi fvMxi bv gi ZvwjKv `L Z n e Ges MÖvgevmxM Yi mv _ Av jvPbv K i DcKvi fvMxi bv gi ZvwjKv Pzov Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) SDF, PAST

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 5. iv¯ v PAST, 1g eQi SDF: 1g eQ i mve CSO PAST cÖwZwbwa e jb h, h mg¯ cÖ R± Ges `w¶Y KvUvi wej Ges gÛjcvov MÖvg mg~n MÖv g gv Si SDF 2q c e©i KvR ïi Ki jI MÖvg¨ Kv ` ji Kvi Y Ask dvuKv i L KvR Ki Z cvi Qbv| `ycv k iv¯ v c~e© KvUvgwb MÖv gi mgm¨vi GLbI Kiv n qwQj m Kvb mgvavb nqwb| mg¯ iv¯ vi Kv `vcvov Mªv gi wKQy As ki iv¯ vi cv ki ZvwjKv Zix Kiv Rwg wWMÖxi Pi MÖvg evmxi nIqvq Rwgi n q Q| gvwjKMY iv¯ vi KvR Ki Z evav m wó PMA: c~e©- Ki Q| KzUvgwb A bK RvqMvq iv¯ vi gvwU fiv Ui KvR kl MÖv gi VDC, n jI e wó nIqvi Kvi Y MÖvgevmxMY Nvm PMC Ges I nZ jvMv Z cvi Q bv| `wi`ª ì mwnZ 1g eQ ii Kvb MÖv gi Rb¨ bZzbfv e Kvb K_v ejv n q Q| mve-cÖ R± G¨v cÖBR Kiv n e bv Ges GB MÖv gi h wel q SDF eivei wPwV w` q Rvbv bv AskwU Z n q Q| Aby`v bi UvKv CSO cÖwZwbwa e jb h: wb q we iva Ø ^ wbim bi Rb¨ mvcgvix, c~e© AvgLvIqv, mLv b K KZ AvP©vKvw ` Ges gÛj cvov MÖvg mg~ ni w` q Q Zvi VDC, PMC Ges MÖvgevmxM Yi mv _ ZvwjKv Zix Av jvPbv Kiv n q Q| K i gvV gÛjcvov MÖv g ¯ vbxq cÖfvekvjxiv KvR ch©v q hvPvB Ki Z evav m wó Ki Q| Kiv n q Q| SDF Gi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq h: KwgwUi iv¯ vq gvwU KvUvi KvR Av M kl Ki Z m`m¨MY n e Ges ch©vqµ g Nvm jvMv Z n e| welqwU `ª Z 1g eQ ii 50wU iv¯ v mve cÖ R ±i 2q mgvavb Ki eb wKw¯ i UvKv Qvo Ìqv n q Q| e j Rvwb q 1g eQ ii Kvb mve-cÖ R± 1g eQi w` q Qb| wnmv eB G¨v cÖBR Ki Z n e Ab¨_vq ev` PAST: w` Z n e| MÖvgevmxMY 2q eQi 100% Aby`v bi UvKv Rgv PAST Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, deª qvix 2005 ch© 2q eQ ii 150wU K i Q G iKg mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ ve cvIqv M Q| Gi g a¨ gvU 35wU GKwU mve-cÖ R± (SvDWv½v MÖvg, MÖv gi ZvwjKv cviivgivgcyi BDwbqb) evwZj Kivi Rb¨ SDF cvIqv M Q hvi eivei wPwV Ìqv n q Q| g a¨ 25wUi 40wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± G¨v cÖBR K i mve-cÖ R± SDF G cvVv bv n q Q gvP© 2005 gv m cÖ cvR¨vj SDF AviI 80 wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± G¨v cÖBR _ K cvIqv Kiv m¤¢e n e| M Q| GB Pvu`cyi MÖv gi iv¯ vi KvR 10% kl 25wUi g a¨ 22wU 71

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ n q Q| 22wU nvqvZcyi MÖv gi cÖ¯ vweZ iv¯ v mve- G¨vcÖvBR¨vj cÖ R ±i wKQy Ask e¨w³MZ RvqMvq covi wi cvU© Ziv d j m ó RwUjZv wbimb n q Q Ges Kiv n q Q| MÖvgevmxM Yi Dcw¯ wZ Z G¨v cÖBR Kiv n q Q| SDF Gi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq h: SvDWv½v MÖvg, cviivgivgcyi BDwbqb Gi wel q PAST _ K cvVv bv wPwV GLbI cvIqv hvqwb| 7 wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R ±i UvKv Qvo `Iqv n q Q|

wm×v : gÛjcvov MÖv gi welqwU mgvav bi Póv Ki Z n e mgvavb bv n j mve-cÖ R ±i UvKv Qvo Ìhv n e bv| `vwqZ¡: CSO h mg¯ MÖv g VDC I PMC Gi Ø î Kvi Y KvR Ki Z mgm¨v n Q mLv b KwgwUi m`m¨MY Ges MÖvgevmx ì GK mv _ wb q wm×v wb Z n e h KvRwU K Ki e| `vwqZ¡: PAST weMZ mfv: 1g eQ i h mg¯ MÖv g gv Si Ask dvuKv i L `ycv k iv¯ v Kiv n qwQj m mg¯ iv¯ vi ZvwjKv Zix Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) SDF c~e© KyUvgwb MÖv gi 25 Rb nZ`wi `ªi KvQ _ K 500 UvKv K i Pvu`v bIqvi welqwU we¯ vwiZ ch©v jvPbv K i mgvav bi eë¯ v wb Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PMA, CSO 2q eQ ii h mg¯ MÖvg 100% Aby`v bi UvKv Rgv K i Q, m MÖvg mg~n iv¯ vi Kv Ri Rb¨ avb jvMv bv eÜ i L Q| H mKj MÖv g mve-cÖ R± cÖ_ g G¨v cÖBR Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST 7. mve- PAST, PAST D jL K i h, 44wU KvjfvU© mve- cÖ R± SDF cÖ R ±i g a¨ 35wUi KvR ïi n q Q| Aewkó¸ jv KvjfvU© UvKv bv cvIqvi Rb¨ KvR ïi Ki Z cvi Q bv| Kvjfv U©i Kv Ri gvb m vl RbK|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ wm×v : UvKv Qvo Ìqvi mv _ mv _ evKx KvjfvU© mg~ ni KvR ïi Kiv wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST gÛj cvovi iv¯ vi KvR kl Kivi ci Kvjfv U©i UvKv Qvo Ìqv n e| 9. Kv Ri CSO CSO cÖwZwbwa D jL K ib h, CSO: AMÖM Ges 183wU iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± cwigv ci KvR ¯^-cÖ R ±I wZ SDF kl n q Q| ZvwjKv MÖv gi Aby`v bi UvKv msMÖ ni Rb¨ BDwbqb DØy×KiY Kvh©µg Pj Q| cwil ` Ìqv 60wU MÖvg 80%, 16wU 60%, 14wU 40% nqwb| Gi Dci Ges 44wU MÖvg 40% Gi bx P UNO mv ne K Aby`vb msMÖn m¤úb K i Q| mve-cÖ R± 180wU mve-cÖ R± SDF G cvVv bv n q Q| cÖ¯ v ei Pzw³ ¯ ^v¶i n q Q 27wU mve-cÖ R ±i| wi cvU© 16wU MÖv gi e¨vsK óU g U SDF G Ìqv n q Q| cvVv bv n q Q| Uªwbs 16wU MÖv g RLD Uªwbs Ìqv n q Q| deª qvix evKx¸ jv G gv m Ìqv n e| 8wU K i MÖvg gvm _ K ïi GK mv _ K i RLD cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n Q| n q Q| cÖwk¶Yv_x© VDC Ges PMCÕi mfvcwZ Ges m¤úv`K| AvMvgx GwcÖj 2005 gv m CSOÕi 2q eQ ii Kvh©µ gi mgqmxgv kl n q hv e| m ¶ Î Zv ì Rbej wb q 3q eQ ii bZzb Kg© GjvKvq KvR ïi Ki e wK-bv SDF Gi Kv Q CSO cÖÖwZwbwa Rvb Z Pvb| wm×v : RLD gvb evov Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO CSO Zvi Pzw³ AbyhvqxB KvR K i hv e| Kvb cwieZ©b n j m wel q Rvbv bv n e| weMZ mfv: mve-cÖ R ±I ZvwjKv mswkó BDwbqb cwil ` w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ v ei wi cvU© mswkó UNO mv ne K w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO wW m¤î gvm _ K RLD Uªwbs ïi Kiv n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO 14. wkLY I PO, PO cÖwZwbwa cÖwZwU BDwbq bi wZbwU PO : SDF K

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ wewbgq TAT, K i MÖv gi PÄ G R U ` ji Kvb kªbxi wjwLZ AvKv i HPO cÖwZwbwaMY mvaviYZ: wgwUs G AskMÖnY Rvbv bv Ges Ki Z AbvMÖn cÖKvk K ib Zvi ZvwjKv wjwLZ n q Q|| SDF AvKv i ck K ib Ges we klY K ib| mfvq A b K PÄ G R U m` m¨i msL¨v Kgv bvi R b¨ gZvgZ `b|

cÖvMÖvg AM©vbvBRviMY wewfb Z_¨ Zz j a ib- gne Z, nvwZfv½v BDwbqb: mv cvqv cvov MÖv gi nZ `wi`ª `j Revi m`m¨ gv: bRi j Bmjvg, wcZv: AvwRRyj gywÝ ¯ vbxq iwRóvW© emiKvix cÖv_wgK we`¨vj qi mfvcwZ wbe©vwPZ n q Qb|

Avãyi ivwKe, jw¶i Pi: AwaKvi Ges AvBb welqK mfvq f~wgnxbiv wKfv e Lvm Rwg c Z cv ib Zv miKvix wewa wb la Ges c×wZ Abyhvqx Av jvPbv Kiv n q Q|

BKevj, K `yqv: PjwZ eQ ii wfwRwW Kv W©i gva¨ g DcKvi fvMxi msL¨v evov bv n e| ¯ vbxq Pqvig¨vb Avk¦vm cÖ`vb K i Qb h hw` msL¨v evov bv nq Z e bZzb DcKvi fvMxi ZvwjKvq nZ `wi`ª `i g a¨ _ K m¤ú ³ Kiv n e|

byi j nK, evnv`yivev`: ev m`cyi MÖv gi gvQv: mv R`v eMg 2 eQi hveZ ¯ ^gxi msmv i Av Qb| wKQyw`b c~ e© Zvi ¯ ^vgx XvKvq Kv Ri D Ï k¨ wM q Zvi mv _ hvMv hvM wQb K i| Gfv e wKQyw`b Pjvi ci wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µ gi AvIZvq GW fv KU MÖv g hvIqvi ci mv R`v Zvi kibvcb nb| welqwU Rvbvi ci Zvi ¯ ^vgx MÖv g wd i Zv K evwo wdwi q bIqvi Rb¨ D `¨Mx nq| cieZx© Z MÖvg¨ gvZe `i Dcw¯ wZ Z mv R`vi ¯ ^vgx Zv K Zvi evwo Z wb q hvb| eZ©gv b Zviv fvj Av Qb|

wm×v : PÄ G R Ui msL¨v 30 RbB _vK e| h mg¯ m`m¨MY AvMÖnx Zv `i m¤ú ³Zv evov Z n e| wK 30 Rb m`m¨ KB Kvh©µg m¤ú K© Ges Gi ev¯ evq b Zv `i mnvqZvi wel q AewnZ Ki Z n e|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ weMZ mfv: 30 Rb PÄ G R U m` mï Kvb& kªbxi cÖwZwµqv wK Zv wjwLZ AvKv i SDF G Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 15. Kv Ri PO (1g PO mfvq Zv ì PjwZ Ges weMZ gv mi AMÖM eQi) I Kvh©µ gi wZ SDF we¯ vwiZ weeiY wjwLZ AvKv i ck K ib Ges Zv Zz j a ib| cÖwZwbwa AviI D jL K ib h, MZ 17B deªqvix 2005 Zvwi L Zv ì 1g eQ ii Kv Ri mgq kl n q Q Ges Zviv 1g eQ ii mgy`q KvR mwVKfv e m¤úb Ki Z m¶g n q Qb| 16. cÖwk¶Y PO I PO cÖwZwbwa e jb, hviv cÖwk¶Y wb q Q I SDF Zviv `ª Z UvKv Pv Q| cÖwk¶ Yi welq mg~n Pvwn`v fy j hv Q| 17. gvwmK CSO, CSO e jb, 190wU Mªv gi VDC Zv ì gvwmK mfv PO, mfv K i Q| HPO, TAT I Functional Group Gi bw_ msi¶Y mwVKgZ n Q SDF bv e j PMA mfvq Rvbvb| eZ©gv b SW MY bw_ msi¶ Y MÖ ci m`m¨ ì mnvqZv Ki Q| G KvRwU ax i ax i MÖ ci m`m¨ ì nv Z Q o Ìqv A_ev GKB GjvKvi whwb wjL Z co Z cv ib Ggb KvD K (`jB wVK Ki e) bw_ msi¶Y wkwL q bIqvi K_v e jb| cieZx© Z hZw`b D³ GjvKvq _vK e Zv `Lvïbv K i GKwU wbf©i hvM¨ Ae¯ vq wb q h Z cvi e| 19. nZ PO, weMZ mfv: HPO: PO `wi `ªi HPO, PO MÖv gi h Ask wb q KvR Ki Q TAT Ges MÖv gi h Ask ZvwjKv TAT I HPO m Ask wb qB KvR Ki e| wb q KvR Ki Q SDF `vwqZ¡: TAT, HPO mLv b Ges ev` cov As kI KvR Ki Q| 25. bvUK PO I 2q eQ i bvU Ki w¯ Þ cwieZ© bi KvR Pj Q SDF Ges Zv kxNÖB cwieZ©b Kiv n e| wm×v : bvUK mg~n mgqgZ ïi Ki Z n e KviY MÖvgevmxMY hw` `xN© mgq A c¶v K i Zvn j Zv ì g a¨ wei c cÖwZwµqv m wó n e| mKj welq K bvU K A ©fy³ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 35. ¯ zj PAST, nvwZfv½v BDwbq bi ev mZcyi ¯ z ji KvR kl mve- SDF ch©v q| evi qvgvix MÖv gi ¯ z ji wcjvi Zixi cÖ R± KvR Pj Q| Kv Ri gvb m vlRbK e j PAST

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ Rvbvq| 39. e¨vsK CSO, MZ deª qvix gv m 34wU e¨vsK GKvD U Lvjv GKvD U PAST I n q Q| RbZv e¨vsK GKvD U Lvj Z Pvq bv| SDF mvbvjx e¨vsK GKvD U Lyj jI RwUjZv m wó Ki Q| eKkxM Ä 7wU MÖv gi e¨vsK GKvD U Lvjv evKx Av Q| wm×v : SDF _ K G wel q c` ¶c bIqv n e| `vwqZ¡: SDF 58. m¨vwbU PO I PO cÖwZwbwa e jb h, ¨vwi SDF miKv ii wm×v Abyhvqx PjwZ eQ ii g a¨ j¨vwUªb K `yqv BDwbq bi mKj MÖvg mg~n K 100% m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq Avbv m¤¢e n e Ges G R b¨ webvg~ j¨ j¨vwUªb mieivn Kiv n e| d j MÖvgevmxMY wbR Li P j¨vwUªb evbv Z Pv Q bv| AvMvgx gvP© 2005 G wPKvRvwb BDwbq bi 3wU MÖvg 100% m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq P j Avm e| eª¨vK _ K my` gy³ F Yi e¨e¯ v Kivi Póv Kiv n Q hv Z MÖvgevmxMY m¨vwbUvix j¨vwUªb Zix Ki Z cv i| GB Kvh©µ gi AvIZvq evi qvgvix `w¶Y cwðg cvov MÖv gi MÖvgevmxMY KZ© K M nxZ Kvh©µg ev¯ evq bi Rb¨ 10 nvRvi UvKv FY msMÖ ni Póv Kiv n Q|

SDF cÖÖwZwbwa e jb h, Gwel q MªvgevmxM Yi m PZbZv evov Z n e| MÖvgevmxMY m PZb n j wb R ì D `¨ MB j¨vwUªb Zix Ki e| evB ii mvnv hï Rb¨ A c¶v Ki e bv| 66. Kv Ri TAT, HPO cÖwZwbwa weMZ Ges PjwZ gv mi AMÖM HPO I Kvh©µg mg~n mfvq wjwLZ AvKv i Dc¯ vcY wZi SDF K ib| K qKwU welq Zz j aiv nj: we iY meyRcyi, cwðg AvgLvIqv Ges Pi nvwZfv½v MÖv g m¨v UjvBU wK¬wbK Pvjy Kiv n q Q| KZ© K wbe©vwPZ Jl ai ZvwjKv cÖwZwU Jl ai `vKv b jvwM q Ìqv n q Q| nvwZ fv½v BDwbq b GKwU bb- gvB µvw¯ wc c¨v_jwR Pvjy Kiv n q Q|

wm×v : `vKv b Jl ai ZvwjKv jvwM q w` jB n e bv, Zv

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: HPO 67. wPwKr TAT, HPO cÖwZwbwa e jb h: mv wd HPO I evnv`yivev` BDwbq b cÖvß UvKvi cwigvb MÖnY SDF LyeB Kg, ZvB wfwWwmÕi GKvD U Rgv Kiv nqwb| A bK wfwWwmÕi Kvb wbR¯ ^ GKvD U bB ZvB Zv ì R b¨ bZzb K i GKvD U Ki Z n Q| wm×v t wPwKrmv wd eve` cÖvß UvKv MÖvgevmxM Yi nv Z Ìqvi cvkvcvwk wbwðZ Ki Z n e h UvKv e¨vs Ki GKvD U Rgv Ki Q| `vwqZ¡: HPO 68. ¯ z j PO I PO cÖwZwbwa e jb, bZzb SDF eqm 12 eQ ii ekx n j S i cov Q j g q ì QvÎ ¯ z j fwZ© Ki Z Pvq bv| QvÎx A bK RvqMvq mx Ui ¯ ^íZvi K_v D jL K i fwZ© Zv ì fwZ© Kiv nq bv| wbwðZ hviv Z Zxq kªbx ch© covïbv K i ¯ zj KiY Q o Q Zv ì 4_© kªbx Z fwZ© Kivi Rb¨ c~ e©i ¯ z ji cÖksmvcÎ PvIqv nq| hv A bK ¶ Î msMÖn Kiv wk¶v_©xi c ¶ m¤¢e nq bv| h mg¯ Q j g q ¯ zj _ K Drop out n q Q Zviv nqZ: Zv ì MÖv gi wKsev cvk¦©eZx© MÖv gi ¯ z j Aa¨qb K iwQj ZvB mB mg¯ QvÎ-QvÎx Zv ì c~ e©i ¯ z j fwZ© n j mg¯ RwUjZv wbimb n e e j wRGg ( cÖvMÖvg) g b K ib| 70. wjM¨vj PO I PO Gi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq h, PO: wK¬wb SDF TOR Abyhvqx cÖ_g eQ i cÖwZwU MÖv g wjM¨vj wK¬wbK K `yevi wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µg m¤úb ev¯ evq bi n q Q| MvBWjvBb SDF eZ©gv b 55-60% MÖvgevmx AvBb Ges G cvVv bvi Rb¨ Zv ì b¨vh¨ AwaKvi m¤ú K© m PZb| cª¯ Z Kiv n Q| weMZ mfv: miKvix wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µg ev¯ evq bi we¯ mvnvqZv cvIqvi vwiZ weeiY wjwLZ AvKv i SDF G cvVv Z welqwU ekx n e| K i fvev n Q| `vwqZ¡: PO wjM¨vj wK¬wbK ev¯ evq bi MvBWjvBb Ges wjM¨vj wK¬wbK Kvh©µ g Kv_vI ekx mnvqZv cÖ`v bi cÖ qvRb `Lv w` j Zv SDF G wPwV w` q Rvbv Z n e|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ 71. nvZ PO I PO cÖwZwbwa e jb h, wdì wfwRU Ges PO: avIqv SDF hvPvB hi gva¨ g nvZ avqv (LvIqvi Av M Ges mjd gwbUwis cvqLvbv _ K Avmvi c i) Z_¨ msMÖn Kiv Gi di gU Zix n q Q| nvZ avqvi Z_¨ mj d gwbUwis di gU Kiv nqwb| Zix Kiv m¤¢e bq| `wi`ªZvi Kvi Y Zviv Lvevi Av M ev cvqLvbv _ K Avmvi ci mvevb e¨envi Ki Z cvi Qb bv| Z e kZKiv KZfvM MÖvgevmx mvevb, QvB ev ïay cvwb w` q nvZ cwi¯ vi K ib Zv Zzjbvg~jK wPÎ wjwLZ AvKv i SDF mfvq ck K ib Ges Av jvPbv K ib|

nvZ avqv I cvwbi ee¨nv ii Z_¨ msMÖ ni Rb¨ PRA c×wZ e¨envi Kiv h Z cv i e j _ K ejv nq| g¨v bRvi, wmwW, PRA Gi gva¨ g Z_¨ msMÖn wKfv e Ki Z nq Zv mfvq Dcw¯ Z mKj K `Lvb| Gfv e Z_¨ msMÖn Kivi Rb¨ PO K e jb|

weMZ mfv: hfv eB nvK cvqLvbv _ K Avmvi ci nvZ avqv wbwðZ Ki Z n e| cÖ qvR b mjd gwbUwis Gi di gU Zix K i eënvi Ki Z n e| 72. ¯ ^v¯ ¨ PO, PO: 7 eQ ii PO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, welqK HPO, NID Kh©µ gi AvIZvq cvuP eQ ii wkï ì wUKv NID Kg©m~Px Kg©m~ TAT I `vb eÜ K i Ìqv n q Q| eÜ Kiv n q Q| Px SDF eZ©gv b 0-1 eQ ii wkï ì wbqwgZ wUKv `vb eZ©gv b ïaygvÎ Kvh©µ gi AvIZvf~³ Kiv n q Q| 1 eQi ch© 2q eQ i Zv ì Kg© GjvKvi MÖvg mg~ n Rb¥ wkï ì wUKv MÖnYKvix h mg¯ wkïi eqm AvMvgx Ìqv nq| deª qvix 2006 G GK eQi n e Zv ì wUKv `vb Kg©m~Px i AvIZvq wbeÜb Kiv n e| ¯ ^v¯ ¨ welqK wewfb Kg©m~Px FWC Ges FFA MY K mv _ wb q ev¯ evqb Kiv n Q| wm×v t 7 eQ ii NID Kg©m~Pxi we¯ vwiZ weeiY msMÖn Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 74. wfwË HPO, HPO cÖwZwbwa Rvbvb h: Rwic TAT I wfwË Rwic Kvh©µg PjwZ gv m kl n e SDF Ges Zv GwcÖj 2005 Gi 1g mßv ni g a¨ SDF G cvwV q Ìqv n e| 75. PRA HPO, wm×v t HPO: Health Kvh©µg TAT I HPO Ges TAT PviwU Kvh©µ gi MÖvg Ges Hazard, SDF cvov wfwËK Ki e Ges Zv Z wKi c cv_©K¨ Seasonal `Lv hvq Zv ciewZ© mfvq Zv ck Ki e| 78

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µg welq hvi Rb¨ Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZ©x djvdj bs cÖ hv R¨ `Lv hvq Zv ciewZ© mfvq Zv ck Ki e| Variation cvov `vwqZ¡: HPO, TAT wfwËK Dchy³ Ges mfv e Kiv n Q| Venn diagram and Mobility cvov wfwËK cÖ qvRb bq Ges Zv MÖvg wfwËK Kiv n Q| 78. Kv Ri PO (2q cÖ_g GB mfvq Dcw¯ Z mK j wb R ì g a¨ AMÖM eQi) I cwiwPZ nb| GQvovI PO Kg©xMY Zv ì wbwÏ©ó wZ SDF MÖv g wM q VDC I PMC m`m¨ ì mwnZ cwiP qi AwfÁZv Zz j a ib|

mfvi Av jvP¨ m~Px

SDF : wRGg ( cªvMÖvg), g¨v bRvi (m¨vc), g¨v bRvi (wmwW) I g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj), | CSO : c Ö R ± Kv-AwW© bUi, mKj wdì mycvifvBRvi I BwÄwbqvi

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

PO : (1g eQi): cÖ R± KvAwW© bUi, KwgDwbwU W fjc g U ¯ úkvwjó, ¯ §j ¯ j weR bm Wf jc g U ¯ úkvwjó I mKj cªvMÖvg AM©vbvBRvi| PAST : wUg wjWvi I wdì BwÄwbqvi| HPO : w d ì g ¨ v bRvi| TAT : K b m v j U ¨v U | PO (2q eQi): cÖ R± KvAwW© bU, Uªwbs Kv-AwW© bUi, cÖvMÖvg mycvifvBRvi, mvk¨vj gwejvBR¨vi| PMA : wmwbqi wimvm© Awdmvi I wimvm© Awdmvi|

(gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb) Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Gm wW Gd

weZiY 1/ SDF I TAT Gi mswkó Kg©KZ©ve ` 2/ mswk•ó CSO, PO, PAST, HPO I PMA Gi cÖwZwbwae `|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

10.3.4 Monthly/Quarterly Coordination Meeting Minutes, Code no. MCM G- 6/January 2005, Gaibandha

mvm¨vj Bb fó g U cÖvMÖvg cÖ R± gvwmK Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbv mfvi Kvh©weeiYx, 10-11B Rvbyqvix 2005 ¯ vb: B Gm wW I Awdm K¶ MvBevÜv m`i Ges mv`yj¨vcyi, MvBevÜv

MvBevÜv Rjvi gvwmK mg ^q mfvi cÖ_gwU CSO- BGmwWI Gi MvBevÜv Awd mi cÖwk¶Y K ¶ 10B Rvbyqvix ejv 2.00 NwUKvq AbywôZ nq| GB mfvq CSO I PAST - Gi wW m¤^i gv mi Kv Ri AMÖMwZ I Rvbyqvix 2005 gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv wb q Av jvPbv Kiv nq| wØZxq mfvwU BGmwWI Gi mv`yj¨vcyi Awdm K ¶ 11B Rvbyqvix mKvj 9.30 NwUKvq AbywôZ nq| G Z PO, HPO Ges TAT Zv `i Kv Ri AMÖMwZ I cwiKíbvi cÖwZ e`b ck K ib| Dfq mfvq mfvcwZZ¡ K ib SDF Gi Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Rbve gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb| bx P Dfq mfvq Av jvwPZ g~j Askmg~n, wm×v Ges d jvAvcK Z welq¸ jv ewY©Z nj|

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 1 wmc- PAST, GmwWGd _ K Gch© KZwU iv¯ v eb¨vq iv¯ vi CSO Dc-cÖK íi dvÛ wiwjR Kiv n q Q Zv ¶wZMÖ¯ eZ©gvb Ges PAST Gi Kv Q Rvb Z PvIqv nq| GQvov 32wU iv¯ v Ae¯ v SDF weMZ mfvi wm×v gvZv eK PAST ms® vi-Gi Rb¨ Gi Kg©Kv Ûi AMÖMwZ mg~n bMb¨ e j Enhance estimate GmwWGd _ K Rvbv bv nq| ewa©Z Kiv n q Q| Li Pi 10% bM` Ges 5% kª gi gva¨ g MÖvgevmx enb Ki eb| eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ iv¯ v¸ jv m¤úb Kivi Rb¨ eb¨vi ci cÖYxZ cÖv°wjZ e¨ qi Kgc ¶ 10% UvKv mswkó wcGgwmi e¨vsK wnmv e Rgv `qvi ci GmwWGd-Gi Aby`vb cvIqvi Av MB MÖvgevmx Zv `i UvKv w` qB KvR ïi Ki Z cvi eb e j GmwWGd _ K ejv nq| GQvov Av iv Rvbv bv nq iv¯ vi Kv Ri ¸bMZgvb m¤ú K© wek¦e¨v¼ cÖwZwbwa we klK i GKwU MÖv g gvwU `yigy Ri e¨vcv i Am vl cÖKvk K i Qb| wm×v : 1. eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ 32wU iv¯ v ms® v ii Rb¨ MÖvgevmx `i Av e`bcÎ PAST Ges CSO Gi gva¨ g Ri ixwfwË Z GmwWGd-G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ges CSO|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 2. m e©v P 10w` bi g a¨ eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ 32wU iv¯ v ms® v ii KvR kl Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST | 3. 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv Z iv¯ v Ges KvjfvU©-Gi KvR GKBmv _ ïi Ki Z n e Ges cvBc XvjvB qi AwfÁZv m¤úb ivRwgw¯ ¿ wb qvM Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST|

weMZ mfvi wm×v : 1. 31/12/2004 Gi g a¨ mKj Earth work- Gi KvR kl Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 2. GmwWGd eivei wcGgwm Gi c¶ _ K Fund release Kivi Rb¨ `iLv¯ w` Z n e| eb¨vi Kvi b ¶wZMÖ¯ 32wU Dc- cÖKí ms® vi Kivi Rb¨ mswkó MÖvgevmx `i Community contribution wnmv e gvU UvKvi Kgc ¶ 10% Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 3. hme MÖv g iv¯ vi KvR n e mLv b iv¯ vi cvk¦©eZ©x Rwgi avb jvMv bv, hw` m¤¢e nq wKQyUv wejw¤^Z Kiv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO Ges PAST| 2 wUDeI CSO, wcGgG _ K Rvbv bv nq GLb _ K qj PAST mKj wUDeI qj n e Mfxi| wUDeI q ji Ges KvwiMix mn hvwMZvi welqwUI cÖm½Z SDF D jL Kiv nq| G m¤ú K© GmwWGd _ K Rvbv bv nq h, wUDeI qj Mfxi n jI Dnvi wbK U cy iv bv Kvb Mfxi wUDeI qj _vKv Pj ebv| wm×v t 1. Mfxi bjK~c ev¯ evq bi ¶ Î cÖwZwUi DcKvi fvMx n e 20 _ K 30wU cwievi| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ges CSO|

weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. 12/12/2004 Gi g a¨ mKj bjK~c Dc-

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ cÖKí kl Ki Z n e Ges 15/12/2004 Gi g a¨ wej wb Z n e| Ab¨_vq wej Ìqv n ebv| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 2.mfvq wm×v nq h eZ©gvb Ae¯ vq mswkó wcGgwm K GKUz ZvMv`v w` jB bjK~c Gi Amgvß KvR ¸ jv kl n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 3. bjK~ ci XvjvB kl n j Curing Kivi ci ìx bv K i `ª Z 100% KvR kl Ki Z n e| 4. bjK~ç jv Mfxi n e Ges Dnvi wWRvBb Ki Z Amyweav n j CSO cÖ K kjxMY mswkó Dc Rjvi Rb¯ ^v¯ ¨ cÖ K kj wefv Mi KvwiMix mnvqZv MÖnY Ki eb| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ges SDF| 5. bjK~c Gi Amgvß KvR¸ jv `ª Z kl Kivi wm×v M wnZ nq| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 3 gvwmK PAST PAST Gi c¶ _ K MZ wW m¤îÕ 04 Gi AMÖM Ges Kvh©µ gi eY©bv Zz j aiv nq: wZ CSO - 46wU iv¯ v Dc-cÖK íi KvR ïi n q Q hvi g a¨ 8wUi KvR kl n q Q| - 45wU cvBc KvjfvU© Dc-cÖK íi 145wU cvBc XvjvB Kiv n q Q| - 2wU e· KvjfvU© Dc-cÖK íi KvR ïi n q Q| - 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvi 31wU Dc- cÖKí mv f© Kiv n q Q Ges cÖ¯ vebv G¨v cªBR Kiv n q Q 9wU| CSO Kv-AwW© bUi wb R ì Kvh©µ gi eY©bvq MZ wW m¤îÕ04 Gi wbæi c AMÖMwZ Zz j a ib: - nZ-`wi`ª ì ZvwjKv Pzov Kib n q Q 6wU MÖv g| - wfwWwm MVb Kiv n q Q 2wU MÖv g | - mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ wZ Ges GmwWGd-G Rgv Ìqv n q Q 62wU| - wcGgwm MVb Kiv n q Q 65wU| - e¨v¼ wnmve Lvjv n q Q 40wU|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ - wfwWwmi gvwmK wgwUs Kiv n q Q 209wU MÖv g| - mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evqb (1g eQi) Kiv n q Q 60wU MÖv g| 4 1g PO Ges wm×v t eQ ii CSO MÖvg Db qb KwgwU¸ jvi mfv wbqwgZ MÖvg Abyôv bi Póv Pvwj q h Z n e| Db qb `vwqZ¡t PO| KwgwU i mfv 6 Dc- CSO, CSO-Gi c¶ _ K ejvnq 1g eQ ii cÖKí PAST, MÖvg¸ jv Z KvR Kivi mgqmxgv Pzw³ aviYv Ges Abyhvqx MZ wW m¤^ i kl n q Q SDF wK CSO-Gi KvR GL bv kl nqwb| Ge¨cv i SDF _ K CSO K bZzb K i cÖ¯ ve cvVv bvi Rb¨ ejv nq| SDF _ K PAST Gi Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv G¨v cÖB Ri axiMwZi Rb¨ Am vl cÖKvk Kiv nq Ges wek¦e¨v ¼i D× wZ w` q ejv nq Rvgvjcy ii P q MvBevÜvq Kv Ri MwZ axi Ges 1g eQ ii KvR 2q eQ ii k lI mgvß nqwb Ges 2qeQ ii MÖv gi KvR 3q eQ iI P j h Z cv i| wm×v t 1. 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv Z Dc-cÖK íi KvR D Øva bi mgq wfwWwm, wcGgwm Ges MÖvgevmx `i Dcw¯ wZ wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 2. AvMvgx 28/02/05 Zvwi Li g a¨ 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvi mKj Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 3. Dc-cÖK íi KvR ïi nIqvi Av M wcGgwm K wnmve i¶b Ges Kv Ri gvb wbwðZ Kivi Rb¨ cÖwk¶b w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ges CSO | 4. wKQy iv¯ v h¸ jvi Pzw³bvgv n q M Q m¸ jvi dvÛ wiwjR n q M Q a i wb q Ri ix wfwË Z KvR ïi Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 5. hme Dc-cÖK íi mv f© Av M Kiv n q Q m¸ jvi G¨v cªBR Av M Ki Z n e|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ `vwqZ¡t PAST| 6. hme Dc-cÖK íi Community contribution 100% collection n q M Q m¸ jvi G¨v cÖBR C ì Av M Ki Z n e (22/01/05)| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 7. cÖ Z¨K Dc-cÖK íi Rb¨ Avjv`v Avjv`v e¨v¼ GKvD U _vK e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 8. wfwWwmGi gvwmK mfvq wcGgwm wnmve-cÎ Zz j ai e| weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. Dc-cÖKí Apprisal `ª Z K i KvR ïi Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 2. cwðg ivgRxeb MÖv g Leave vacancy RwbZ Kvi b Abycw¯ Z Kg©xi `vwqZ¡ Ab¨ gvVKg©x K w` q w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 3. h Dc-cÖKí¸ jvi Znwej Aegy³ Kiv n q Q m¸ jv mswkó cÖ K kjxMY ZvwM` w` q ev¯ evqb KvR ïi Ki eb| 4. gv K©U kW Gi KvR AvMvgx 10 w` bi g a¨ kl Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 5. ¯ zj Dc-cÖK íi KvR c i ai jI Pj e| iv¯ v Dc-cÖK íi KvR Av M kl Ki Z n e| 8 MÖvg CSO SDF _ K ejvnq hme MÖv g ïi ZB wbw`© Ges Am vl `Lv `q, mme MÖvg ev` ó KiY SDF Ìqv fv jv| Kvib, Hme MÖvg¸ jv Z cieZx© Z AveviI Am vl `Lv `q| 16 Rvbyqvi PAST CSO Gi c¶ _ K RvbyqvixÕ 05 gv mi xÕ 05 Ges Kg©cwiKíbvq ejv nq: gv mi CSO 1. wfwWwm MVb Kiv n e 2wU| Kg©cwi 2. 13wU MÖv g wcGgwm MVb Kiv Kíbv n e| 3. 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv _ K gvU 64wU Sub-project appraisal SDF G cvVv bv n e| 4. 251wU MÖvg Db qb KwgwUi mfv Av qvRb Kiv n e| 5. 5wU wcGgwm K cÖwk¶ bi eë¯ &v Kiv n e| 6. e¨v¼ wnmve Lvjv n e 40wU|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 7. mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evqb (1g eQi) Kiv n e 60wU MÖv g| 18 Mªvgev CSO wØZxq eQ ii me MÖvg¸ jvi nZ`wi`ª wØZxq eQ ii me mx ì Ges jv Ki bv gi ZvwjKv SDF Gi MIS G MÖvg¸ jvi bvg SDF GKmv _ Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO nZ`wi`ª jv Ki wjwce× bv gi ZvwjKv KiY SDF Gi MIS G Rgv Ìqv n q Q | 1 gvwmK PO PO wb R ì Kvh©µ gi eY©bvq MZ AMÖM wW m¤î gv m m¤úvw`Z mKj Kv Ri wZ wjwLZ Z_¨ mieivn K ib Ges Zvi Dci Av jvPbv K ib| wb æ Av jvPbvi D jL hvM¨ Askmg~n Zz j aiv nj: - Rights Ges Law Gi Dci gvV ch©v q nZ`wi`ª kªbxi 363wU MÖ c K 791wU mk bi gva¨ g cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n q Q| - nZ`wi`ª kªbxi 265wU MÖ ci mfv Av qvRb Kiv n q Q| - Halth, Hygiene, Nutrition Ges Sanitation Gi Dci Advocacy session ev¯ evqb 240wU| - Cultural program Av qvRb Kiv n q Q 10wU MÖv g| - Skill training-Gi Rb¨ Mi gvUvZvRvKiY Ges `wR© cÖwk¶ bi Dci 2wU WªvdU cÖwk¶b g¨vby qj Zix Kiv n q Q| - Skill training Gi AvIZvq Mvfx cvj bi Dci 1wU e¨v P 30 Rb K 3w`b e¨vcx P~ov cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n q Q| - Rights Ges Law Gi Dci cÖwk¶Y gwbUwis Kiv n q Q 65wU Ges Halth, Hygiene, Nutrition Ges Sanitation Gi Dci Advocacy session gwbUwis Kiv n q Q 15wU| - wk¶vi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n q Q 8wU| - m PZbZv Zixi Rb¨ MÖvg ¯ ^ Qv mexMY m¨vwb Uk bi Dci cvov wfwËK 300wU Av jvPbv K ib|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ - 15wUTheme based case Gi Dci Z_¨ msMÖn Kiv n q Q| - Rb¥ 188wU, g Zÿ 51wU Ges weevn iwR óªkb 66wU iKW© Kiv n q Q | - wUKv cÖ`v bi AvIZvi evB i _vKv 188Rb wkï K wUKv cÖ`vb Kiv n q Q| - MÖvg Db qb KwgwUi mfv n q Q 60wU| - MÖv gi wk¶K, ¯ zj cwiPvjbv KwgwU Ges AwffveK ì mv _ 14wU wgwUs Kiv n q Q| 22 Ab¨vb¨ CSO, MvBevÜv mÌ Dc Rjvq AwZkxNÖB wcGgwm MVb Z_¨ PO, PAST Gi Awdm ¯ vc bi Rb¨ SDF Gi kl n q Q PAST, c¶ _ K civgk© Ìqv nq| 183wU MÖv g| Ges cÖ_g eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv Z Pjgvb Dc-cÖKí SDF ev¯ evq b mn hvMxZvi Rb¨ cÖ qvRbxq Rbej Pjgvb ivLvi Rb¨ CSO K SDF eivei ìLv¯ cvVv bvi cÖ¯ ve Ìqv nq| SDF Gi c¶ _ K Rvbv bv nq Rural piped water supply Gi Rb¨ c ó cvlK nIqvi Rb¨ cybivq CSO K Aby iva Kiv nq| weMZ mfvi wm×v : A Z: c ¶ mKj MÖv g wcGgwm MVb kl Ki Z n e AvMvgx 31/12/2004 Gi g a¨| `vwqZ¡: CSO| 23 gvV CSO, PMA Gi c¶ _ K wfwWwm Strengthening ch©v q PAST, Gi welqwU AMÖvwaKvi wfwË Z `Lvi i PO Ges wel q Av jvKcvZ Kiv nq| G cÖm ½ AwfÁZv SDF SDF _ K PMA-Gi mycvwik PvIqv nq| I wkLb CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq Cultural program, IC Campaign Gi GKwU kw³kvjx gva¨g| G cÖm ½ SDF _ K ejv nq 3q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv Z KvR ïi Kivi Av M IC Compaign cwieZ©b Kivi AeKvk Av Q| GQvov PMA K IC campaign, Dc¯ vcb `¶Zv Ges mswkó cÖwk¶Y DcKiY LwZ q `Lvi Rb¨ ejv nq| G cÖm ½ SDF _ K ejvnq hw` wfwWwm¸ jv wcGgwm mn cÖwZgv m wbqwgZ mfvK i Z e wfwWwm Strengthening G A bK`yi GwM q hv e| Aek¨ GUvI Av jvPbv nq

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ h wfwWwm Strengthening Gi Rb¨ wbqwgZ mfvB h _ó bq| Ge¨vcv i SDF _ K GmAvBwcwc cÖK íi me mn hvMx ms¯ v¸ jvi Kv Q civgk© PvIqv nq| wm×v : 1. wfwWwm Strengthening G AMÖvwaKvi w` q GwM q h Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PO| 2. gvwmK wi cv© Ui mv _ gvV ch©v qi AwfÁZv I wkLb mshy³ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PO| weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1| gvV ch©v qi AwfÁZv I wkLb gvVKgx©Mb 1-2 cvZvi g a¨ wj L mswkó mycvifvBRv ii gva¨ g SDF G cvVv eb| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PO | 32 Rvbyqvi PO Ges PO Gi c¶ _ K Rvbyqvix gv mi Kg© xÕ05 SDF cwiKíbvq ejv nq: Gi - nZ`wi`ª kªbxi 363wU MÖ ci Kg©cwi mfv Av qvRb Kiv n e| Kíbv - Cultural program Av qvRb Kiv n e 51wU MÖv g| - Skill training Gi AvIZvq 8wU e¨v P 240 Rb K 3w`b e¨vcx P~ov cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n e| - wk¶vi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n e 220wU| - wUKv cÖ`v bi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n e 120wU| - Good governance Gi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n e 40wU| - 60wUTheme based case Gi Dci Z_¨ msMÖnKiv n e| - MÖvg Db qb KwgwUi mfv Av qvRb Kiv n e 61wU| - Conflict resolution Gi Rb¨ wewfb wfwWwm _ K wbe©vwPZ 2wU MÖ c K cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n e| - MÖvg ¯ ^ Qv mexMY Feild Facilitator Gi mnvqZvq Rb¥, g Zÿ weevn iwR óªkb Ges

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ m¨vwb Uk bi Dci cÖwZ MÖv g cvov wfwËK 10wU m PZbZv g~jK Av jvPbv/DVvb eVK Ki eb Ges 60wU MÖv gi Z_¨ msi¶Y Ki eb| - 800 Rb ¯ zj weg~L Ges wkky kªwgK Gi ¯ z j fwZ© wbwðZ Kiv n e| 34 IGA PO Ges SDF _ K Rvbv bv nq Seed Capital Ges SDF cÖ`v bi ¶ Î 80% Gi evB i AvMÖnx evRvi nZ`wi`ª ì Micro credit Ìqvi wel q PKSF- Rixc Gi mv _ Av jvPbv Pj Q| G cÖm ½ PO Gi c¶ _ K ejvnq nZ`wi`ª ì hme MÖ c mvg_©ëvb Zviv Ab¨ GbwRI-Gi mv _ m¤ú ³ n Z cv i Ges nZ`wi`ª ì MÖ ci e¨v¼ GKvD U Lvjv Ges mÂq Pvjy Ki j fv jv nq| SDF _ K G cÖm ½ Rvbv bv nq nZ`wi`ªiv Zv ì wbR¯ ^ iwRóvi mÂq ïi Ki Z cv i Ges wbR `vwq Z¡ e¨v¼ GKvD U Lyj Z cv i| wcGgG-Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq Skill training-Gi mv _ mv _ Seed Capital weZiY Kiv n j ekx Kvh©Ki n e| PO welqwU mg_©b K ib| PO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq wKQy nZ `wi`ª Lye fv jv Skill training MÖnb Ki Qb huviv mn RB Ab¨ GbwRI _ K mvnvh¨ cv eb, G ì Seed Capital cÖ`vb _ K ev` Ìqv hvq wKbv| G cÖm ½ SDF _ K ejv nq Kvb Ae¯ v ZB Zuv ì ev` Ìqv hv ebv Kvib G Z wbqg f½ n e| 37 Rb¥, PO Ges PO KZ ©K iKW©K Z mKj we qi g Zÿ SDF iwR óªkb GL bv nqwb| Gi Kvib Ges wnmv e PO _ K Rvbv bv nq dxm Ges weevn gvnivbvi UvKv ekx aiv Z Gi c n q Q| iwR ó wm×v t ªkb 1. A- iwRwóªK Z we q¸ jvi c _K ZvwjKv Zix K i iwR óªkb Gi Rb¨ ZvwM` w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO|

weMZ mfvi wm×v t SDF _ K Rvbv bv nq we qi iwR óªkb ZvwjKv (15 _ K 25 eQ ii Av Mi GgbwK 1 eQi n jI) hw` Dnv iwRwóª

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ nq Z e Zvi ZvwjKv SDF K Rvbv Z n e| 38 m¨vwb PO Ges SDF _ K g Wj MÖvg¸ jv Z PO _ K Ukb SDF m¨vwb Ukb Gi axi AMÖMwZi Rb¨ Rvbv bv nq h Kg©m~ Am vl cÖKvk Kiv nq| Kvib, ¯ vqx Px GMÖvg¸ jv D`nvib wnmv e Ab¨ MÖv g mvBb evW© Dc¯ vcb Kiv hv e| GKB mv _ me Zix Kiv GLbI ïi MÖv g m¨vwb Ukb Kg©m~wP Rvi`vi nqwb| A¯ vqx KiviRb¨ ejv nq| mvBb evW© wm×v t jvMv bv n q Q| 1. AvMvgx 6 gv mi g a¨ me MÖv g m¨vwb Ukb Kg©m~Pxi D jL hvM¨ AMÖMwZ AR©b Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 2. AvMvgx 25/02/05 Gi g a¨ g Wj MÖvg¸ jv Z 100% mdjZv AR©b Ki Z n e, m¨vwb Ukb Kg©m~wPi Dci| `vwqZ¡: PO 39 VDC CSO PO Gi c¶ _ K ejvnq h nZz CSO 1g SDF _ K ejv nq Ges Ges eQ ii MÖvg _ K Kg©x cÖZ¨vnvi h MVbZ ¿ MVbZ SDF K i Q m nZz wfwWwmi Institution wb q gvwmK ¿ building-Gi Rb¨ AwZwi³ cÖwk¶b mfvq Av jvPbv Kg©m~wP Pvjv bv n e wKbv| Kvib, nIqv ìKvi| wPKwb MÖvgevwm grm¨ Pvl-Gi Dci Ges ga¨ ejKv MÖvgevwm gyiwM cvj bi Dci c«wk¶Y P q Qb| Gwel q SDF _ K ejv nq wfwWwmi mv _ ekx hy³ nIqv wVK n ebv Kvib PO Gi cÖavb D Ïk¨ nZ`wi`ª ì Ae¯ vi Db qb| G cÖm ½ Av iv Rvbv bv nq wek¦e¨v¼ wfwWwm¸ jvi Kg©Kv Ûi Dci wbf©i K i D `¨vMx Ges m¶g wfwWwm¸ jv K AwZwi³ A_© eivÏ Ki e, Zv ì cÖvwZôvwbKx Ki Yi Rb¨| wm×v : 1. 2qeQ ii Rb¨ bZzb bIqv MÖvg¸ jvi wfwWwmGi bv gi ZvwjKv 14/01/05 Gi g a¨ cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO| wfwWwmGi wbqwgZ gvwmK mfvq wcGgwm Dc-cÖK íi Kv Ri AMÖMwZ Av jvPbv Ki e Ges Li Pi wnmve w` e| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PAST| 40 wk¶v PO Ges PO _ K Rvbv bv nq wk¶vi Dci Kvh©µg SDF GW fv Kmx mk b fv jv mvov cvIqv

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ hv Q| AwffveK, wk¶K I ¯ zj eë¯ vcbv KwgwUi h _ mfvi gva¨ g ¯ zj weg~L I S i cov wkky ì K ¯ zjMvgx Kivi wel q mK ji g a¨ AvMÖ ni m wó n q Q| wkï kªwgK ì cyb: fwZ© m¤ú K© wcGgGi cÖ k i Rev e SDF Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq wkï kªwgK ì ZvwjKv wb q PO N i N i visit Ki e Ges Community, Parents, Teacher Ges TEO Gi mv _ Av jvPbv Ki Z n e| G ì wk¶v DcKiY SDF _ K mieivn Kiv n e| PO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq wkï kªwgK hv ì fwZ©i eqm bB Zv ì Rb¨ Kvb Skill training, SDF wP v Ki e wKbv| G cÖm ½ SDF _ K 2/3 MÖv gi mevB K GKmv _ MÖ c K i Zv ì fvM¨ Db q bi Rb¨ wK Kiv hvq Zvi cÖ¯ ve cÖi Yi Rb¨ PO K ejv nq| wm×v t 1. wk¶vi Dci GW fv Kmx mk b Kvb mswkó miKvix ms¯ v hgb Dc Rjv wk¶v Awdmvi, mnvqZv bv Ki j SDF- K Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO| 41 mvs¯ PO Ges SDF _ K Rvbv bv nq Local talents- Ì wZK SDF w` q Abyôvb Av qvRb Ki j cÖfve Kg©m~ my`yicÖmvix I ¯ vqx nq| GcÖm ½ PO Px Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq Qvw `qvcyi MÖv g wKQy ¯ vbxq Performer w` q Abyôvb Av qvRb Kiv n q Q| wm×v t 1. mvs¯ wZK cÖvMÖv gi cÖfve my`yicÖmvix I ¯ vqx Kivi Rb¨ Local talents ì w` q Abyôvb Av qvRb Kiv ìKvi| `vwqZ¡: PO| 2. GKwU m¤ú~Y© mvs¯ wZK cÖvMÖvgGi wfwWI wPÎ avibK i SDFG cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO| 42 wUKv PO Ges SDF _ K ejvnq wUKv`vb Kg©m~Px `vb SDF Ae¨vnZ ivL Z n e Ges beRvZK ì Kg©m~ wUKv`vb wbwðZ Ki Z n e Kvib me Px ev Pv GL bv wUKv cvqwb|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 43 ¯ ^v¯ ¨ TAT, MZ wW m¤î gv m HPO Gi Kvh©µg mev HPO, Zz j aiv nj: CSO - wfwWwm I MÖvgevmx ì mv _ Ges PO cÖwZwU MÖv g (9wU) Baseline survey Gi Dci Uªwbs Kiv n q Q| - 3wU MÖv gi (c~e© ivgRxeb, wKmvgZ me©vb ` I cwðg ivgRxeb) Baseline survey kl n q Q| - cÖKíf~³ MÖv gi BwcAvB Ges d¨vwgwj c¨vwbs m Uv i wbqwgZ AskMÖnb Kiv n q Q| - cÖK íi j¶¨ D Ïk¨ I Kg©cwiKíbv m¤ú K© jvKvj GbwRI Ges ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤úwK©Z miKvix Kg©KZ©v ì mv _ GKvwaKevi hvMv hvM Kiv n q Q| - Mf©cvZ I wkï g Zz¨ m¤ú K© MÖvgevmx I wfwWwm Gi mv _ Av jvPbv Kiv n q Q| - ¯ zj nj&_ wb h cÖKí GjvKvq cÖavb wk¶K mn Ab¨vb¨ wk¶K ì mv _ Av jvPbv Kiv n q Q| Z e ¯ z ji evwl©K cix¶v Ges kxZKvjxb QywUi Kvi b ¯ zj nj_ Avi¤¢ Kiv hvqwb| HPO Gi c¶ _ K mgm¨v wn m e D jL Kiv nq h Baseline survey welqK cÖwk¶ b MÖv gi QvÎ- QvÎx ì Drmvng~jK AskMÖnY m Ë¡I wfwWwm-Gi cy ivcywi mn hvwMZvg~jK g bvfve bv _vKvq mv f©i Kv R wfwWwm Ges QvÎ QvÎx ì Zgb Kvb mn hvwMZv cvIqv hvqwb| GQvovI miKvix ¯ ^v¯ ¨Kg©KZ©viv AwaKvsk mgq e¨¯ _vKvq cÖK íi e¨vcv i we¯ vwiZ Av jvPbv Kiv hvqwb| HPO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq cÖK íi wbqgvbyhvqx wfwWwm KZ ©K wd wba©viY Kiv n q Q Ges cwðg ivgRxeb MÖv g GKRb cjx wPwKrmK (wfwWwm mfvcwZ) Zv ì Kv R mgm¨v m wó Ki Qb| Kvib, Zuvi e¨vw³MZ ¯ ^v_© G Z ¶zb n Q|

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ wm×v : 1. cwðg ivgRxeb MÖv g cwjwPwKrmK K cÖwk¶Y w` q `L Z n e| Zv ZI mgm¨vi mgvavb bv n j H MÖvgwU ev` w` q Ab¨ MÖvg A f~©³ Ki Z n e| 2. 15B Rvbyqvix Gi g a¨ Baseline survey kl Ki Z n e| 3. cÖKíf~³ MÖvg¸ jv Z mgm¨v mgvav bi Rb¨ PO Ges CSO gvwU fkb w` e| Zv ZI mgm¨vi mgvavb bv n j MÖvg e`jv bvi welq we ePbv Kiv n e| 4. fyjwPwKrmvi Kvi b cU dz j hvIqv ivMx m¤úwK©Z Z_¨ D`nviY wn m e wewfb wfwWwmGi mfvq Dc¯ vcb Ki Z n e| 5. HPO Gi Work plan Ges wi cvU© AvMvgx gvm _ K dig¨vU AvKv i w` Z n e| 6. `vBgv (avÎx) Gi gva¨ g MÖv g gvwU fkb Ki Z n e| HPO AvMvgx Rvbyqvix gv mi cwiKíbvq e jb: 1. ¯ zj nj_-Gi Kvh©µg ïi n e| 2. `vBgv (avÎx) cÖwk¶Y Kvh©µg ïi Kiv n e | 3. KwgDwbwU dv g©mx cÖwZôvi e¨vcv i wfwWwm-Gi mv _ Pzw³ n e | 4. Baseline survey Ae¨vnZ _vK e| 5. wUGgGmGm Av qvwRZ wfwWwm wgwUsG AskMÖnb Kiv n e| 6. cÖK íi wbqgvbyhvqx wfwWwm KZ ©K wba©vwiZ wd Abyhvqx ivMx ì e¨ve¯ vcÎ cÖ`vb Kiv n e| 7. miKvix Kg©KZ©v ì mv _ mv¶vr I cÖKí welqK Av jvPbv Ae¨vnZ _vK e| 44 KwgDw CSO, Kvb& Kvb& Dc-cÖK íi KwgDwbwU bwU PO Ges Kw UªweDk bi UvKv m¤úyY© ev Kw Uªw SDF AvswkK fv e e¨v ¼ Rgv n q Q Zvi eDkb ZvwjKv mswkó cÖ K kjxMY I GKBmv _ SDF K Rvbv Z n e| KvR AwZ `ª Z ïi Kivi Rb¨ Gme Dc-cÖK íi cÖ¯ vebv K AMÖvwaKvi Ìqv n e| wm×v :

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 1. iwRóvi LvZvi gva¨ g UvKv Av`vq nIqvi mwVK wnmve ivL Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO | 2. wcGgwm e¨v ¼ mÂqx wnmve Lyj e| `vwqZ¡: CSO | 3. wcGgwmi Kvb m` mï nv Z bM` UvKv ivLv hv ebv| UvKv msMÖ ni mv _ mv _ wcGgwmi e¨v¼ GKvD U Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO | 45 wfwWw CSO, CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejvnq evRvicvov cwðg kvw ivg m I PO Ges MÖv g (1g eQ ii MÖvg) wfwWwm MÖvg ev` w` q wcGgw SDF mfvcwZ Ges m¤úv`K wcGgwm Gi Kv Q Zvi cwie Z© mi Ø Ø Ab¨vq fv e UvKv PvIqvi Kvi b Ø Ø ïi bZzb MÖvg n q Q| G wel q SDF _ K Rvbv bv nq wbe©vPb Kiv hw` G welwU cy ivcywi wb®úwË bvnq n q Q| Z e HMÖv gi cieZ©x Kv Ri e¨v¼ WªvdU& Ìqv hv ebv| wm×v : evRvicvov MÖv gi Ø Ø wbimb Ki Z n e| hw` Ø Ø wbimb bvnq Z e e¨v¼ WªvdU& diZ cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO | weMZ mfvi wm×v : 1. cwðg kvw ivg MÖvg K ev` w` q Zvi cwie Z© bZzb MÖvg wbe©vPb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO. 46 AvBbx PO Ges PO Gi c¶ _ K Rvbv bv nq GKwU mnvqZv SDF MÖv g weev`xiv ev`x c¶ K ûgwK Kvh©µg w` Q gvgjv Zz j bIqvi Rb¨| wm×v : 1. wfwWwmGi wgwUsGi gva¨ g MÖvgevmx K mgm¨vwU Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO | 2. m¨vc cÖK íi AvIZvq KZ¸ jv AvBbx mnvqZv Ìqv n q Q Ges Kvb¸ jv mgvavb n q Q, Kvb¸ jv nqwb -Zvi Dci GKwU c~b©v½ wi c©vU SDF -G cÖiY Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO |

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report me© k l wR Gg ( cÖvMÖvg) e jb mve-cÖ R± G¨v cÖBRvj Ges mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evqb `ª ZZi Ki Z n e, h¸ jv kl n q M Q m¸ jvi P~ov wej `ª Z cvVv Z n e| Avi Kvb Av jvPbv bv _vKvq mevB K ab¨ev` Rvwb q wZwb mfvi KvR kl K ib| mfvi Av jvP¨ m~Px 7. wW m¤^i 2004 gv mi AMÖMwZ| 8. Rvbyqvix 2005 Gi Kg© cwiKíbv| 9. weMZ gvm¸ jvi wkLb | mfvq Dcw¯ Z e¨w³eM© SDF : wR Gg ( cÖvMÖvg), g¨v bRvi (m¨vc), g¨v bRvi (wmwW) Ges g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) | CSO : cÖKí mg ^qKvix, mKj wdì mycvifvBRvi Ges 4Rb UKwbK¨vj mv cvU© BwÄwbqvi | PO: cÖKí mg ^qKvix, mnKvix cÖKí mg ^qKvix, Uªwbs mg ^qKvix, 3 Rb mnKvix Uªwbs Awdmvi Ges 4 Rb wdì mycvifvBRvi| PAST: wUg wjWvi (fvicÖvß), Awdm g¨v bRvi Ges 8 Rb wdì BwÁwbqvi| TAT : 1 Rb civgk©K| HPO : 1 Rb wUgwjWvi Ges 1 Rb gwWK¨vj Awdmvi| PMA : wmwbqi wimvm© Awdmvi Ges wimvm© Awdmvi |

(gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb) Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Gm wW Gd | weZiY - SDF Gi mswkó Kg©KZ©ve `| - mswk•ó CSO, PO, PAST , HPO, TAT I PMA -Gi cÖwZwbwae `| 10.3.5 Monthly/Quarterly Coordination Meeting Minutes, Code no. MCM G- 7/February 2005, Gaibandha

mvm¨vj Bb fó g U cÖvMÖvg cÖ R± gvwmK Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbv mfvi Kvh©weeiYx, 7-8B deª qvix 2005 ¯ vb: B Gm wW I Awdm K¶ MvBevÜv m`i Ges mv`yj¨vcyi, MvBevÜv

MvBevÜv Rjvi gvwmK mg ^q mfvi cÖ_gwU CSO- BGmwWI Gi MvBevÜv Awd mi cÖwk¶Y K ¶ 7B deª qvix ejv 2.00 NwUKvq AbywôZ nq| GB mfvq CSO I PAST - Gi Rvbyqvix gv mi Kv Ri AMÖMwZ I deª qvix gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv wb q Av jvPbv Kiv nq| wØZxq mfvwU BGmwWI Gi mv`yj¨vcyi Awdm K ¶ 8B deª qvix mKvj 9.30 NwUKvq AbywôZ nq| G Z PO (TMSS), HPO Ges TAT Zv `i Kv Ri AMÖMwZ I cwiKíbvi cÖwZ e`b ck K ib| Dfq mfvq mfvcwZZ¡ K ib SDF Gi Rbv ij g¨v bRvi

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 1 wmc- PAST, PAST Gi c¶ _ K Rvbv bv nq my ìMÄ 2q eQ ii iv¯ vi CSO Dc Rjvi ivgRxeb BDwbq bi cwðg MÖvg¸ jv Z eZ©gvb Ges ivgRxeb MÖv g GKwU iv¯ v cwieZ©b iv¯ v Ges Ae¯ v SDF K i Ab¨ iv¯ v A ©f~³ Kiv n q Q| Kvj©fvU©-Gi G Z wbw`©ó ev R Ui AwZwi³ LiP n e| KvR GKBmv _ SDF _ K Gwel q ejv nq MÖvgevmx ïi n q Q| hw` Pvq Zvn j iv¯ vi `N©¨ Kwg q `qv hvq wK H iv¯ vi ms hvM h Kvb GKw` K Aek¨B eo iv¯ vi mv _ ev g~j iv¯ vi mv _ _vK Z n e| PAST Gi c¶ _ K Av iv Rvbv bv nq h, 2q eQ ii Rb¨ wbe©vwPZ wKQy MÖv g BDwbqb cwil` _ K iv¯ vi KvR Kiv n q Q| SDF _ K Gwel q ejv nq cÖKífy³ MÖv g iv¯ vq Kvb BDwbqb cwil` hw` KvR K i Z e HMÖv g Av jvwPZ iv¯ vq Avi wmc-Gi A_© e¨q m½Z n ebv| wm×v : 1. hme iv¯ v wewfb Kvi b cÖKí cwiKíbv gvZv eK Kiv nqwb mme iv¯ vi 2q wKw¯ i UvKv AvbycvwZK nv i Kgv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 2. Contract sign nIqvi Av M mswkó MÖv gi Rwgi gvwjK ì Rwg cÖ`v bi welqwU wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 3. hme MÖv gi iv¯ vi ZvwjKv MÖvgevmx KZ© K CAP Gi gva¨ g Pzov Kiv n q Q Zvi ZvwjKv mswkó BDGbI K cÖ`vb Ki Z n e hv Z H iv¯ vi KvR BDwbqb cwil` _ K Kiv bv nq| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 4. hme BDwbqb cwil` Pqvig¨vb CAP G A f©~³ iv¯ vi ZvwjKvq ¯ ^v¶i Ki Qb bv Zv ì ZvwjKv SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| weMZ mfvi wm×v : 1.eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ 32wU iv¯ v ms® v ii Rb¨ MÖvgevmx ì Av e`bcÎ PAST Ges CSO Gi gva¨ g Ri ixwfwË Z

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ GmwWGd-G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ges CSO| 2. m e©v P 10w` bi g a¨ eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ 32wU iv¯ v ms® v ii KvR kl Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST | 3. 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv Z iv¯ v Ges Kvj©fvU©-Gi KvR GKBmv _ ïi Ki Z n e Ges cvBc XvjvB qi AwfÁZv m¤úb ivRwgw¯ ¿ wb qvM Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 2 wUDeI CSO, PAST Gi c¶ _ K Rvbv bv nq PvPxqv SDF _ K qj PAST gxiMÄ (BDwbqb Zvivcyi, Dc Rjv Rvbv bv nq Ges my ìMÄ) MÖv g H BDwbq bi 2qeQ ii SDF Pqvig¨vb wcGgwm-1 Gi 16wU bjK~c MÖvg¸ jv Z ¯ vc b evav m wó Ki Qb| SDF _ K Kvb bjK~c Ìqv wUDeI qj wel q ejv nq ¯ úbmi cvIqv n ebv | Z e Lye mv c ¶ Rural piped water Pvjy Kivi ekx wel q MÖvgevmx ì DrmvwnZ Kiv h Z hw` Pvwn`v _v K cv i| Z e wm×v t 1wU ev 2wU Mfxi 1. PvPxqv gxiMÄ MÖv g AwZ`ª Z bjK~c bjK~c ¯ vc bi eë¯ v Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ìqv h Z cv i| Ges CSO| weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. Mfxi bjK~c ev¯ evq bi ¶ Î cÖwZwUi DcKvi fvMx n e 20 _ K 30wU cwievi| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ges CSO | 3 gvwmK PAST PAST Gi c¶ _ K MZ RvbyqvixÕ05 Gi AMÖM Ges Kvh©µg eY©bv Zz j aiv nq| wZ CSO 1g eQi ii MÖvg¸ jv Z AMÖMwZ wbb¥i c: - gvU 90wU iv¯ v Dc-cÖK íi g a¨ KvR kl n q Q 50wUi Ges dvÛ wiwjR Kiv n q Q 77wU | - gvU 63wU cvBc KvjfvU© Dc-cÖK íi g a¨ dvÛ wiwjR Kiv n q Q 55wUi, KvR ïi n q Q 42wUi Ges 3wU Dc- cÖK íi KvR cy ivcywi kl n q Q | - gvU 87wU bjK~c Dc-cÖK íi g a¨ KvR kl n q Q 78wUi| 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvZ AMÖMwZ wbb¥i c: 97

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ - gvU 50wU Dc-cÖKí mv f© (wdì G¨vcÖvBRvj) Kiv n q Q Ges GmwWGd _ K dvÛ wiwjR Kiv n q Q 24wU Dc-cÖK íi| CSO Kv-AwW© bUi wb R ì Kvh©µ gi eY©bvq MZ RvbyqvixÕ05 Gi wbæi c AMÖMwZ Zz j a ib: - wfwWwm MVb Kiv n q Q 2wU MÖv g | - mve-cÖ R± cÖ¯ wZ Ges GmwWGd- G Rgv Ìqv n q Q 52wU| - wcGgwm MVb Kiv n q Q 13wU| - e¨v¼ wnmve Lvjv n q Q 40wU| - wfwWwmi gvwmK wgwUs Kiv n q Q 190wU MÖv g| - mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evqb (1g eQi) Kiv n Q 60wU MÖv g| - 131wU MÖv g KwgDwbwU Kw UªweDkb msMÖn Kiv n Q| - mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evq bi Rb¨ (2q eQi) wcGgwmi mv _ Pzw³ Kiv n q Q 30 wU | - mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evqb (2q eQi) Kiv n Q 28wU MÖv g| 4 1g PO weMZ mfvi wm×v t wfwWwm Ges eQ ii (TMSS) MÖvg Db qb KwgwU¸ jvi mfv Pvwj q wcGgwm Gi MÖvg Ges h Z n e| h _ D `¨v M Db qb CSO `vwqZ¡t PO (TMSS)| 1g eQ ii MÖvg KwgwU Db qb i mfv KwgwU¸ jvi mfv Pj Q| 6 Dc- CSO, 1g eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv Z CSO -Gi KvRKivi 2q eQ ii cÖKí PAST, mgqmxgv g wLK fv e evov bv MÖvg¸ jv Z Dc- aviYv Ges n q Q| SDF _ K CSO K 1g eQ ii cÖK íi KvR SDF MÖvg¸ jv Z KvR Pvwj q hvIqvi Rb¨ ejv D Øva bi mgq nq| SDF _ K PAST Gi Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ wfwWwm, vebv G¨v cÖB Ri axiMwZi Rb¨ wcGgwm Ges Am vl cÖKvk Kiv nq| SDF _ K MÖvgevmx ì Av iv ejv nq GKwU MÖv gi Dcw¯ wZ wbwðZ AeKvVv gvMZ Db qb Kv Ri m¤ú~b© Kiv n Q| mydj cvIqvi Rb¨ cÖ qvR b AwZwi³ A_© Dc-cÖK íi KvR eivÏ Kiv h Z cv i| PAST Gi c¶ _ K ïi nIqvi Av M cvBc Kvjf©vU wel q ejv nq Wing wall Gi wcGgwm K ewa©Z As ki Rb¨ Rwg c Z Amyweav wnmve i¶b Ges

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ nIqvq cvBc KvjfvU© Dc-cÖKí ev¯ Kv Ri gvb evq b mgm¨v n Q| SDF _ K G wbwðZ Kivi Rb¨ cÖm ½ ejv nq Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv cÖwk¶b Ìqv Zixi mg qB wbKUeZ©x Rwg gvwjK ì n e| mv _ Ge¨vcv i K_v e j wb Z n e GgbwK m¤¢e n j wjwLZ _vK e hv Z ev¯ evq bi mgq mgm¨v bv nq| CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq iv¯ vi wbKUeZ©x Rwg Z avb jvMv bvi d j A bK RvqMvq iv¯ vi KvR ìx Z ïi Kiv hv e wK G Z e wócv Zi Kvi b KvR kl bvI n Z cv i| SDF _ K G cÖm ½ ejv nq MÖvgevmxiv wm×v wb e Zviv KvR ïi Ki e wK Ki ebv| Z e wcGgwmi mv _ hw` Pzw³bvgv n q hvq Zvn j wcGgwmi GKvD U 1g wKw¯ i UvKv cvwV q Ìqv n e| wcGgG Gi c¶ _ K 1g eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvi KvR 3q eQ i P j hvIqvi m¤¢vebv KZUzKz Gwel q cÖk Ki j SDF _ K ejv nq Kvb Ae¯ v ZB 1g eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvi KvR 31/03/05 Gi c i h Z cvi ebv| wm×v t 1. AvMvgx 15/02/05 Gi g a¨ gvwUi KvR msµv mKj Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv Ges 28/02/05 Gi g a¨ 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvi mKj Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO Ges PAST | 2. gvU 69wU Dc-cÖK íi Community contribution 100% collection n q M Q m¸ jvi G¨v cÖBR AMÖvwaKvi wfwË Z 15/02/05 Gi g a¨ m¤úb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 3. e¨v¼ GKvD U Lvjvi Rb¨ wiRywjm b Kgc ¶ wcGgwmGi `yB-Z Zxqvsk m` mï mB _vK Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 4. hme Dc-cÖK íi dvÛ wiwjR Kiv n q Q mme wcGgwm K wkNÖ wnmve i¶Y wel q `ª Z cÖwk¶ bi eë¯ v MÖnY Ki Z n e Ges nv Z Kj g kLv Z n e|| `vwqZ¡t CSO Ges PAST| 5. ga¨ ejKvq hw` BDwbqb cwil ì Rb¨

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ wba©vwiZ Rwg ev ` Ab¨ Rwg cvIqv bv hvq Z e G Dc-cÖKí evwZj n q hv e Ges m ¶ Î H MÖvg Ab¨ Dc-cÖKí c Z cv i Z e Zvi cÖ¯ vebv AwZ`ª Z cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 6. CSO Ges PAST Gi wdìBwÄwbqviM Yi Dc-cÖKí cwigv c UvKvi A ¼ 10%Gi ekx eëavb _vKv m½Z n ebv| 7. hme wcGgwm wj÷ gvZv eK DcKiY µq Ki Qbv Zv ì ZvwjKv SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 8. Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebvi mv _ BDwbqb cwil ì QvocÎ I LvmRwgi wel q Aby gv`b _vK Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv Z Dc-cÖK íi KvR D Øva bi mgq wfwWwm, wcGmwm Ges MÖvgevmx ì Dcw¯ wZ wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 2. AvMvgx 28/02/05 Gig a¨ 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvi mKj Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 3. Dc-cÖK íi KvR ïi nIqvi Av M wcGgwm K wnmve i¶b Ges Kv Ri gvb wbwðZ Kivi Rb¨ cÖwk¶b w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ges CSO | 4. wKQy iv¯ v h¸ jvi Pzw³bvgv n q M Q m¸ jvi dvÛ wiwjR n q M Q a i wb q Ri ix wfwË Z KvR ïi Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 5. hme Dc-cÖK íi mv f© Av M Kiv n q Q Ges e¨vsK wnmv e Puv`vi UvKv Rgv n q Q m¸ jvi G¨v cªBR Av M m¤úb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 6. hme Dc-cÖK íi Community contribution 100% collection n q M Q m¸ jvi G¨v cÖBRvj C ì Av M m¤úb

100

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 7. cÖ Z¨K Dc-cÖK íi Rb¨ Avjv`v Avjv`v e¨v¼ GKvD U _vK e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 8. wfwWwmGi gvwmK mfvq wcGgwm Zv `I c~b©v½ wnmve-cÎ Zz j ai e| 16 deª qv PAST CSO Gi c¶ _ K deª qvixÕ 05 gv mi ixÕ 05 Ges Kg©cwiKíbvq ejv nq: gv mi CSO 1. wcGgwm MVb 3wU Kg©cwi 2. DccÖKí cÖ¯ vebv cÖ¯ ywZ 40wU Kíbv Ges GmwWGd-G Rgv`vb 40wU 4. wcGgwmi wnmvei¶Y welqK cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb 5wU 5. e¨vsK wnmve Lyj Z mn hvwMZv cÖ`vb 59wU 6. KwgDwbwU Aby`vb msMª n mn hvwMZv cÖ`vb 60wU 7. wfwWwmi gvwmK mfvi Av qvRb 190wU 8. gvVch©v q Dc- cÖKí ev¯ evqb 60wU MÖv g 9. `jxq MwZkxjZv I bZ Z¡ welqK cÖwk¶b cÖ`vb 5wU e¨vP| 21 gvwmK PO PO (TMSS) wb R `i Kvh©µ gi eY©bvq AMÖM (TMSS) MZ Rvbyqvix gv m m¤úvw`Z mKj Kv Ri wZ wjwLZ Z_¨ mieivn K ib Ges Zvi Dci Av jvPbv K ib| wb æ Av jvPbvi D jL hvM¨ Askmg~n Zz j aiv nj: - nZ`wi`ª kªbxi 363wU MÖ ci mfv Av qvRb Kiv n q Q| - 3wU Cultural program Av qvRb Kiv n q Q | - Skill training Gi AvIZvq Mvfx cvj bi Dci 4wU e¨vP, QvMj cvj bi Dci 2wU e¨vP Ges Mi gvUvZvRv Ki Yi Dci 2wU e¨vP K 3w`b e¨vcx cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb Kiv n q Q| - wk¶vi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n q Q 232wU| - wUKv `qvi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n q Q 120wU|

101

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ - m PZbZv Zixi gva¨ g ¯ ^v¯ ¨m¤§Z cvqLvbv ¯ vcb Kiv n q Q 1642wU| - 591Rb ¯ zj weg~L Ges wkky kªwgK Gi ¯ z j cyb:fwZ© wbwðZ Kiv n q Q| - m PZbZv Zixi Rb¨ MÖvg ¯ ^ Qv mexMY m¨vwb Uk bi Dci cvov wfwËK 240wU Av jvPbv/DVvb eVK K ib| - 5wUTheme based case Gi Dci Z_¨ msMÖn Ges mgvavb Kiv n q Q| - Rb¥ 130wU, g Zÿ 69wU Ges weevn iwR óªkb 81wU iKW© Kiv n q Q | - wUKv cÖ`v bi AvIZvi evB i _vKv 197 Rb wkï K wUKv cÖ`vb Kiv n q Q| - MÖvg Db qb KwgwUi mfv n q Q 61wU| 22 Ab¨vb¨ CSO, wcGgG Skill training Gi AvIZvi evB i 1jv gvP© _ K Z_¨ PO _vKv nZ`wi`ª ì fvM¨ Db q bi Rb¨ MvBevÜv kn ii (TMSS), PKSF Gi mv _ SDF Gi Av jvPbvi kvcjvcvovq PAST PAST, AMÖMwZ m¤ú K© Rvb Z PvB j SDF KZ© c¶ mì PO Gi c¶ _ K G wel q ejv nq Kvb Dc Rjvi Rb¨ (BEES) GjvKvq Kvb& GbwRI KvR Ki e Zv bZzb Awdm Pvjy Ges wbw`©ó n jB Pzov Av jvPbv ïi n e| Kav n e| SDF PO (BEES) Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq 16/02/05 Gi g a¨ 2q eQ ii MÖvg ¸ jv Z mvgvwRK mnvqZv Kvh©µg Gi Rb¨ Kg©x wb qvM Kiv n e Ges deª qvix gv mi k li w` K Staff orientation Ìqv n e| GQvov wbw`©ó K i mve- K UªvK&U wel q SDF Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h PO (BEES) wn m e SDF Gi mv _ Kej 2q eQ ii MÖv g mvgvwRK mnvqZv Kvh©µg Gi Rb¨ Pzw³ n q Q| hw` BEES Ab¨ Kvb ms¯ vi mv _ Pzw³ K i Z e Zv n e BEES Gi Af¨ ixY welq| wm×v : 1. Report card eënvi wb `©kbvi Dci wcGgG CSO Ges PO (TMSS) Kg©x ì cÖwk¶Y w` e| `vwqZ¡: PMA| 2. MÖv g Ab¨vb¨ wel qi Dci GW fv Kmx cÖvMÖvg Gi cvkvcvwk cwievi cwiKíbvi Dci Rvo w` Z n e| 23 gvV CSO, weMZ mfvi wm×v : PO (TMSS) ch©v q PAST, 1. wfwWwm Strengthening G gvwmK

102

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ i PO AMÖvwaKvi w` q GwM q h Z n e| wi c©v Ui mv _ AwfÁZv (TMSS) `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PO (TMSS) | wbqwgZ gvV I wkLb Ges 2. gvwmK wi cv U©i mv _ gvV ch©v qi AwfÁZv SDF ch©v qi AwfÁZv I I wkLb wjwLZ wkLb mshy³ Ki Z n e| AvKv i SDF G `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges mieivn Ki Q| PO (TMSS) | 32 deª qv PO PO (TMSS) Gi c¶ _ K deª qvix gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv ixÕ 05 (TMSS) Kg© cwiKíbvq ejv nq: wiwfD Kiv Gi Ges - nZ`wi`ª kªbxi 363wU MÖ ci mfv n q Q| Kg©cwi SDF Av qvRb Kiv n e| Kíbv - wewfb welq wfwËK Cultural program Av qvRb Kiv n e 45wU| - Skill training Gi AvIZvq Mvfx cvj bi Dci 8wU e¨v P 240 Rb K, Mi gvUvZvRv KiY, QvMj cvjb Ges nvum gyiwM cvj bi Dci cÖwZ wel q 2wU K i e¨v P gvU 180 Rb K 3w`b e¨vcx Pzov cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n e| - wUKv cÖ`v bi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n e 60wU| - Good governance Gi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n e 240wU Ges BDwbqb cwil` m`m¨, Change agent, MÖv gi cÖfvekvjx e¨vw³ Ges wfwWwm m`m¨ ì wb q mfv Av qvRb Kiv n e| - 120Rb Change agent Kg©x ì K Good governance welqK Report card Gi Dci Iwi q Ukb Ìqv n e| - 60wU Theme based case Gi Dci Z_¨ msMÖn Kiv n e| - MÖvg Db qb KwgwUi mfv Av qvRb Kiv n e 61wU| - Conflict resolution Gi Rb¨ wewfb wfwWwm _ K wbe©vwPZ 4wU e¨v P (30 R bi e¨vP) cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n e| - MÖvg ¯ ^ Qv mexMY Feild Facilitator Gi mnvqZvq Rb¥, g Zÿ, weevn iwR óªkb Ges m¨vwb Uk bi Dci cÖwZ MÖv g cvov wfwËK 4wU m PZbZv g~jK Av jvPbv/DVvb eVK Ki eb Ges gwbUwis eB qi gva¨ g 60wU MÖv gi Z_¨ msi¶Y

103

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ Ki eb| - 800 Rb ¯ zj weg~L Ges wkky kªwgK Gi ¯ z j fwZ© wbwðZ Kiv n e| 34 IGA PO SDF _ K Rvbv bv nq Seed Capital Ges (TMSS) cÖ`v bi ¶ Î 80% Gi evB i AvMÖnx evRvi Ges nZ`wi`ª ì Micro credit Ìqvi wel q Rixc SDF PKSF-Gi mv _ Av jvPbv Pj Q| 37 Rb¥, PO A- iwRwóªK we q welqK wcGgG Gi A- iwRwóªK Z g Zÿ (TMSS) cÖ k i Rev e PO (TMSS) Gi c¶ _ K gymwjg we qi Ges Ges ejv nq PO (TMSS) KZ ©K iKW©K Z msL¨v AwZ weevn SDF mKj we qi iwR óªkb GL bv m¤úb bMb¨| iwR ó nqwb| Z e Gi g a¨ D jL hvM¨ cwigvb ªkb wn `y we q i q Q, hv ì we q iwRwó Kivi weavb bB| weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. A- iwRwóªK Z we q¸ jvi c _K ZvwjKv Zix K i iwR óªkb Gi Rb¨ Persue Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 38 m¨vwb PO wcGgG _ K g Wj MÖvg¸ jv Z Ukb (TMSS) m¨vwb Uk bi eZ©gvb Ae¯ v m¤ú K© Kg©m~ Ges Av jvKcvZ Kiv n j G cÖm ½ PO Px SDF (TMSS) _ K ejv nq h eZ©gvb gv mi g a¨ 1wU MÖv g kZfvM mdjZv AR©b n q hv e| SDF _ K g Wj MÖvg¸ jv Z Ges Ab¨ MÖvg¸ jv Z m¨vwb Ukb Kg©m~wP `ª Z GwM q bIqvi Rb¨ ejv nq Ges ejv nq eZ©gvb mgqwUB KvRkyi Kivi Rb¨ me P q Dchy³|

wm×v t 1. GLb _ K gvwmK wfwË Z 60wU MÖv gi m¨vwb Ukb wi cvU© SDF G Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 2. wPK&wb MvÖ g Avevi bZzb K i m¨vwb Ukb Kg©m~Pxi Dci PRA ïi Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 3. Low cost sanitary latrine Gi `vg Abyhvqx cÖwZMÖv g myweav ewÂZ `i QqwU fv M fvM K i gvwU fU Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)|

104

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. AvMvgx 6 gv mi g a¨ me MÖv g m¨vwb Ukb Kg©m~wPi D jÍL hvM¨ AMÖMwZ AR©b Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS) 2. AvMvgx 25/02/05 Gi g a¨ m¨vwb Ukb Kg©m~wPi Dci g Wj MÖvg¸ jv Z 100% mdjZv AR©b Ki Z n e | `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS) 39 VDC CSO, CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, 1g eQ ii 1g eQ ii Ges PO wKQy MÖv g PO (TMSS), CSO Ges MÖvg¸ jv Z CSO MVbZ (TMSS) SDF K bv Rvwb q wfwWwm Gi m`m¨ Gi Kg©x ¿ Ges cwieZ©b Kiv n Q| PO (TMSS) Gi cyb:wb qvM SDF c¶ _ K ejvnq wKQy wKQy wfwWwm Ìqv n q Q| mwgwZi gva¨ g mÂq k~i Ki Z Pvq, GRb¨ e¨v¼ GKvD U Lvjv cÖ qvRb| G cÖm ½ SDF _ K ejv nq h, wfwWwm Ges Bnvi fwel¨r wbf©i Ki e wfwWwmi Kg©Kv Ûi Dci| mvg_©ëvb wfwWwm¸ jv Z wek¦e¨v¼ AwZwi³ A_©vqb Ki e wKbv Ge¨vcv i wcGgG cÖwZwbwa mfvi ` wó AvKl©b Ki j SDF _ K ejv nq wek¦e¨v¼ Gi mv _ G wel q Av jvPbv Pj Q| wm×v : 1. wfwWwmGi gvwmK mfvq KwgwUi m`m¨ cwieZ© bi wel q Lqvj ivL Z n e hb Zv Z mvaviY KwgwUi `yB- Z Zxqvs ki m¤§wZ _v K Ges iRÿwjk&b jLv nq| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PO (TMSS)| 2. wfwWwm K Institution wnmv e Sustainable Kivi c ¶ PO (TMSS) wnmv e TMSS hZw`b Pzw³e× Av Q ZZw`b KvR Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)|

weMZ mfvi wm×v : 1. 2q eQ ii Rb¨ bZzb bIqv MÖvg¸ jvi wfwWwmGi bv gi ZvwjKv 14/01/05 Gi g a¨ cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO| 2. wfwWwmGi wbqwgZ gvwmK mfvq 105

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ wcGgwm Dc-cÖK íi Kv Ri AMÖMwZ GgbwK Kvb mgm¨v _vK j m¸ jv Av jvPbv Ki e Ges Li Pi wnmve eywS h w` e| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PAST| 40 wk¶v PO SDF _ K ejv nq deª qvix gv m ¯ zj Kvh©µg (TMSS) weg~L I S i cov 800 wkky ì g a¨ hviv Ges fwZ© nqwb Zv ì fwZ©i Rb¨ Póv SDF Pvwj q h Z n e| Kvb Kvb ¯ y j AwZwi³ QvÎ-QvÎxi Kvi Y 2 wkd&U Pvjy Av Q e jI Rvbv bv nq | wm×v t 1. ¯ z j wk¶K ¯ ^íZv, Abycw¯ wZ BZ¨vw` Kvi b QvÎ-QvÎxiv ¯ z j h Z wbi rmvwnZ n q c o| Zvi ciI cyb:fZ©xK Z QvÎ-QvÎxiv hv Z wbqwgZ ¯ z j hvq, Zvi Rb¨ m ©v P Póv Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 2. cÖKí GjvKvi A f~©³ ¯ zj¸ jv Z mswkó Dc Rjvi wbe©vnx Kg©KZ©vi mnvqZvq `ª Z eB weZi Yi eë¯ v Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 3. hme ¯ z j AwZwi³ QvÎ-QvÎxi Kvi Y bZzb QvÎ fwZ© Ki Z Abxnv `Lv Q mme ¯ zj¸ jvi ZvwjKv wb q Dc Rjv wk¶v Kg©KZ©vi mnvqZvq dqmvjv Ki Z n e| Zv ZI hw` mgm¨vi mgvavb bv nq, Zvn j G me ¯ z ji ZvwjKv GmwWGdG cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)|

weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. wk¶vi Dci GW fv Kmx mk b Kvb mswk•ó miKvix ms¯ v hgb Dc Rjv wk¶v Awdmvi, mnvqZv bv Ki j SDF K Rvbv Z n e | `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 41 mvs¯ PO weMZ mfvi wm×v t Local talents ì wZK (TMSS) 1. mvs¯ wZK cÖvMÖv gi cÖfve w` q 1wU cÖvM Ges my`yicÖmvix I ¯ vqx Kivi Rb¨ Local MÖv g Övg SDF talents ì w` q Abyôvb Av qvRb Kiv (Qvw `qvcyi, ìKvi| mv`yj¨vcyi)

106

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| mvs¯ wZK 2. GKwU m¤ú~b© mvs¯ wZK Abyôvb Av qvRb cÖvMÖvg Gi wfwWI wPÎ aviY K i Kiv n q Q| SDFG cvVv Z n e| mvs¯ wZK `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| cÖvMÖvg Gi wfwWI wPÎ GLbI aviY Kiv nq wb| 42 wUKv PO wm×v t wUKv`vb `vb (TMSS) 1. wUKv `vb Kg©m~Px Z miKvix Kg©m~Px Kg©m~ Ges Kg©KZ©v/Kg©Pvix ì hZUzKz m¤¢e Ae¨vnZ ivL Z Px SDF mswkó Ki Z n e| n e Ges `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| beRvZK ì wUKv`vb wbwðZ Ki Z n e 43 ¯ ^v¯ ¨ TAT, MZ Rvbyqvix gv m HPO (TMSS) Gi cwðg ivgRxeb mev HPO Kvh©µg Zz j aiv nj: MÖv gi cjx (TMSS), - 7wU MÖv gi Baseline survey kl wPwKrm Ki CSO n q Q| mv _ (wfwWwm Ges PO - cÖKíf~³ mKj MÖv gi wfwWwm-i `qv mfvcwZ) ¯ ^v¯ ¨ (TMSS) ZvwjKv Abyhvqx `vBgv wbe©vPb mev Kg©x ì Ges cÖwk¶ bi Pzov eë¯ v MÖnb Ø Ø wbimb Kiv n q Q| n q Q| - 3wU ¯ z j ¯ zj nj&_ Kvh©µg ïi miKvix n q Q | Kg©KZ©v ì - 4wU KwgDwbwU dv g©mx mv _ mv¶vr I cÖwZwôZ Kiv n q Q| cÖKí welqK - cÖKíf~³ mKj MÖv gi wfwWwm-i `qv Av jvPbv Ae¨vnZ ZvwjKv Abyhvqx MÖvg Wv³vi _vK e| wbe©vPb Ges cÖwk¶ Yi Pzov eë¯ v MÖnb Kiv n q Q| - cÖKíf~³ mKj MÖv gi wfwWwm-i `qv ZvwjKv Abyhvqx ¯ ^v¯ ¨Kg©x wbe©vPb Ges cÖwk¶ Yi Pzov eë¯ v MÖnY Kiv n q Q| - cÖKíf~³ mKj MÖv g ivMx `Lv Ges e¨ve¯ vcÎ cÖ`vb Ae¨vnZ i q Q| - CSO Ges PO (TMSS) Gi mv _ Kg©cwiKíbv mg ^q Kiv n q Q | - ¯ vbxq miKvix/ emiKvix ¯ ^v¯ ¨ ms¯ vi mv _ wbqwgZ hvMv hvM I AskMÖnY Ae¨vnZ i q Q | TAT Ges HPO (TMSS) Gi c¶ _ K ejvnq AwZkxNªB cÖKíf~³ MÖvg¸ jv Z ¯ ^v¯ ¨ mev Pvjy n Z hv Q| cÖwZ

107

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ MÖv g GKwU bvwUk evW© _vK e hv Z mswkó MÖv g Wv³vi emvi w`b Ges mgq my¯ ú÷fv e jLv _vK e| G QvovI `ywU ¯ vqx wK¬wbK wemqK Z_¨ _vK e| cwjwPwKrmK ì cÖwk¶ Yi e¨vcv i ejv nq h, mßv n 2/3 w`b K i cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n e GeO Zv Z 6 gvm mgq e¨q n e| GmwWGd _ K cwievi cwiKíbv welqK CAP Gi wel q Rvb Z PIqv n j TAT Ges HPO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, Ggyû Z© miKvix cwievi cwiKíbv Awd m KD `vwq Z¡ bB | mRb¨ CAP Kiv hv Qbv| G cÖm ½ GmwWGd _ K ejv nq cÖ qvR b Rjv cwievi cwiKíbv Kg©KZ©vi mnvqZv MÖnY Kiv h Z cv i| wcGgGi c¶ _ K wfwWwmGi Safety fund eë¯ vcbv m¤ú K© Rvb Z PvIqv n j GmwWGd _ K ejv nq h, G fund Gi Drm n e wewfb cÖwk¶Y _ K Avqj× UvKv, ivMxi wdm, Jla weµx _ K Kwgkb BZ¨vw` Ges e¨q Kiv n e `wi`ª Ges nZ`wi`ª ì wPwKrmv mevq| ZvQvovI nZ`wi`ª ì Db ZZi wPwKrmvi cÖ qvRb n j G Znwej _ K m ev© P 1 Rb nZ`wi`ª K 1000.00 UvKv Aby`vb Ìqv n e| HPO wUgwjWvi AvMvgx deª qvix gv mi cwiKíbvq e jb: 1. cÖKíf~³ MÖv gi mKj we`¨vj q ¯ zj nj_-Gi Kvh©µg ïi n e| 2. cÖKíf~³ mKj MÖv gi `vBgvi (avÎx) AskMÖn Y Kgc ¶ 2wU e¨v Pi cÖwk¶Y mgvß n e | 3. cÖKíf~³ mKj MÖv g Kgc ¶ 1wU K i KwgDwbwU dv g©mx ¯ vcb Kiv n e| 4. cÖKíf~³ mKj MÖv gi Baseline survey Ges ch© e¶Y m¤úb Kiv n e | 5. wfwWwm-i `qv ZvwjKv Abyhvqx MÖvg Wv³vi wbe©vPb Ges cÖwk¶b ïi Kiv n e| 6. wfwWwm-i `qv ZvwjKv Abyhvqx ¯ ^v¯ ¨Kg©x wbe©vPb Ges cÖwk¶Y ïi Kiv n e| 7. cÖK íi wbqgvbyhvqx wfwWwm

108

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ KZ©©K wba©vwiZ wd Abyhvqx ch©vqµ g mKj MÖv g ivMx `i e¨ve¯ vcÎ cÖ`vb Kiv n e| 8. CSO Ges PO (TMSS) `i mv _ Kg©cwiKíbv mg ^q K i Kvh©µg ev¯ evqb Kiv n e | 9. ¯ vbxq miKvix/ emiKvix ¯ ^v¯ ¨ ms¯ vi mv _ wbqwgZ hvMv hvM I wewfb mgvR mevg~jK Kv R AskMÖnY Ae¨vnZ _vK e | wm×v : 1. KwgDwbwU dv g©mx ¯ vc bi mgq cyivZb dv g©mx ev Jl ai `vKv b Bnv ¯ vc bi Póv Ki Z n e| bZzb K i KwgDwbwU dv g©mx ¯ vc b wbi rmvwnZ Ki Z n e| 2. cÖKí GjvKvi me wfwWwm Gi e¨v¼ GKvD U Lyj Z n e| weMZ mfvi wm×v : 1. cwðg ivgRxeb MÖv g cwjwPwKrmK K cÖwk¶Y w` q `L Z n e Zv ZI mgm¨vi mgvavb bv n j MÖvg Ri ix wfwË Z cwieZ©b Ki Z n e| 2. 15B Rvbyqvix Gi g a¨ Baseline survey kl Ki Z n e| 3. cÖKíf~³ MÖvg¸ jv Z mgm¨v mgvav bi Rb¨ PO (TMSS) Ges CSO gvwU fk bi `vwqZ¡ cvjb Ki e| Zv ZI mgm¨vi mgvavb bv n j Ri ix wfwË Z MÖvg cwieZ© bi wemq we ePbv Ki Z n e| 4. f~jwPwKrmvi Kvi b cU dz U hvIqv ivMx K D`nviY wn m e wewfb wfwWwmGi mfvq Dc¯ vcb Ki Z n e| 5. HPO (TMSS) Gi Work plan Ges wi cvU© AvMvgx gvm _ K di gU AvKv i w` Z n e| 6. `vBgv (avÎx) Gi gva¨ g MÖv g gvwU fkb Ki Z n e| 44 KwgDw CSO, wm×v : bwU PO 1. e¨v ¼ mÂqx wnmve bv Lvjv ch© Kw Uªw (TMSS) KwgDwbwU Kw UªweDkb msMÖn Kiv eDkb Ges hv ebv| SDF

109

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ weMZ mfvi wm×v : 1. iwRóªvi LvZvi gva¨ g UvKv Av`vq Ki Z n e Ges mwVK wnmve ivL Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO | 2. wcGgwm e¨v ¼ mÂqx wnmve Lyj e| `vwqZ¡: CSO | 3. wcGgwmi Kvb m` m¨i nv Z bM` UvKv ivLv hv ebv| UvKv msMÖ ni mv _ mv _ wcGgwmi e¨v¼ GKvD U Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO | 45 wfwWw CSO, weMZ mfvi wm×v : evRvicvov m I PO evRvicvov MÖv gi Ø Ø wbimb Ki Z MÖv gi Ø Ø wcGgw (TMSS) n e| hw` Ø ` wbimb bvnq Z e e¨v¼ wbimb Kiv mi Ø ` Ges WªvdU& diZ cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: n q Q| SDF CSO | 46 AvBbx PO PO (TMSS) Gi c¶ _ K Rvbv bv nq G mnvqZv (TMSS) ch© 3wU KBm wb q KvR ïi Kiv Kvh©µg Ges n q Q| Av iv Rvbv bv nq h GKwU SDF MÖv gi ev`x c¶ Kv U© DwKj K `yBevi mgq w` qI Av mwb| SDF _ K G cÖm ½ ejv nq Gai bi NUbv¸ jvi Case study ivL Z n e|

weMZ mfvi wm×v : 3. wfwWwmGi wgwUsGi gva¨ g MÖvgevmx K mgm¨vwU Rvbv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO(TMSS) | 4.KZ¸ jv m¨vc cÖK íi AvIZvq AvBbx mnvqZv Ìqv n q Q Ges Kvb¸ jv mgvavb n q Q, Kvb¸ jv nqwb -Zvi Dci GKwU c~b©v½ wi cvU© SDF -G cvV Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO(TMSS) | me© k l wR Gg ( cÖvMÖvg) e jb mve-cÖ R± G¨v cÖBRvj Ges mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evqb `ª ZZi Ki Z n e| Pjgvb ivR bwZK Aw¯ iZvi Kvi b Kv Ri AMÖMwZ evavMÖ¯ n jI m e©v P Póv Ki Z n e hv Z mgqgZ KvR kl Kiv hvq| cÖ qvR b Kg©KvÛ K X j mvRv bvi RbÏ wZwb mKj K civgk© `b| Avi Kvb Av jvPbv bv _vKvq mKj K abëv` Rvwb q wZwb mfvi KvR kl K ib|

110

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

mfvi Av jvP¨ m~Px 10. Rvbyqvix 2005 gv mi AMÖMwZ| 11. deª qvix 2005 Gi Kg© cwiKíbv| 12. weMZ gvm¸ jvi wkLb | mfvq Dcw¯ Z e¨w³eM© SDF : w R G g ( c Ö v M Ö v g ), g¨v bRvi (m¨vc), g¨v bRvi (wmwW) Ges g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) | CSO : cÖKí mg ^qKvix, 4 Rb wdì mycvifvBRvi| PO (TMSS): cÖKí mg ^qKvix, mnKvix cÖKí mg ^qKvix, Uªwbs mg ^qKvix, 3 Rb mnKvix Uªwbs Awdmvi Ges 4 Rb wdì mycvifvBRvi| PAST : wUg wjWvi, Awdm g¨v bRvi Ges 12 Rb wdì BwÁwbqvi| TAT : 1 Rb civgk©K| HPO : 1 Rb wUgwjWvi Ges 1 Rb gwWK¨vj Awdmvi| PMA : wmwbqi wimvm© Awdmvi Ges wimvm© Awdmvi| PO (BEES) : 2Rb cÖwZwbwa|

(gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb) Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Gm wW Gd |

weZiY

111

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

10.3.6 Monthly/Quarterly Coordination Meeting Minutes, Code no. MCM G- 8/March 2005, Gaibandha

mvm¨vj Bb fó g U cÖvMÖvg cÖ R± gvwmK Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbv mfvi Kvh©weeiYx, 2-3 gvP©, 2005 ¯ vb: B Gm wW I Awdm K¶, MvBevÜv m`i Ges wU Gg Gm Gm Awdm K¶, my `iMÄ|

MvBevÜv Rjvi gvwmK mg ^q mfvi cÖ_gwU CSO- BGmwWI -Gi MvBevÜv Awd mi cÖwk¶Y K ¶ 2B gvP© mKvj 10.00 NwUKvq AbywôZ nq| GB mfvq CSO I PAST Gi deª qvix gv mi Kv Ri AMÖMwZ I gvP© gv mi Kg© cwiKíbv wb q Av jvPbv Kiv nq| wØZxq mfvwU wU Gg Gm Gm -Gi my `iMÄ Awdm K ¶ 3 gvP© mKvj 9.00 Uvq AbywôZ nq| G Z PO (TMSS), HPO Ges TAT Zv `i Kv Ri AMÖMwZ I cwiKíbvi cÖwZ e`b ck K ib| Dfq mfvq mfvcwZZ¡ K ib SDF Gi Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Rbve gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb| bx P Dfq mfvq Av jvwPZ g~j Askmg~n, wm×v Ges d jvAvcK Z welq¸ jv ewY©Z nj|

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 1 wmc- PAST, CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq wKQz wKQz eZ©gv b cÖKí iv¯ vi CSO MÖv g gvwUi Afv e KvR ïi Kiv hv Q f~³ Kvb iv¯ v eZ©gvb Ges bv| GB Rb¨ MÖvgevmxiv Pzw³bvgv BDwbqb cwil` Avi Ae¯ v SDF Ki Z Pv Qb bv | G wel q SDF _ K ejv ms¯ vi Ki Q bv| nq hw` Zviv Pzw³ bv K i Z e cÖKí _ K 2q eQ ii ev` c o hv e e j Zv ì Rvbv bv h Z MÖvg¸ jv Z cv i| iv¯ v Ges wØZxq eQ ii MÖvg ¸ jv Z cÖKí f~³ KvjfvU©-Gi KvR iv¯ vq BDwbqb cwil` KvR Ki Q wKbv GKBmv _ ïi G wel q PMA Gi mfvi ` wó AvKl©b Ki j n q Q| CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq BDwbqb cwil` Ges mswkó Dc Rjvi wbe©vnx Kg©KZ©v K iv¯ vi ZvwjKv Ìqv n q Q| GKwU MÖv g wZbwU iv¯ vi g a¨ GKwU iv¯ v BDwbqb cwil` ms¯ vi Kivq cÖK íi AvIZv _ K ev` Ìqv n q Q| PAST Gi c¶ _ K Rvbv bv nq 1g eQ ii 3wU MÖv g (ejw` cvov, wKmvgZ me©vb ` Ges c~e© ejKv) Af¨ wib Ø Øi Rb¨ iv¯ vi KvR ïi Kiv hv Qbv| SDF _ K G wel q ejv nq hw` wbw`©ó mgqmxgvi g a¨ KvR ïi Kiv bv hvq, Z e UvKv diZ w` Z n e e j Zv Ì Rvwb q Ìqv hvq|

112

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ wm×v : c~e© ejKvq wcGgwm MV b mgm¨vi Kvi Y iv¯ vi KvR 85% n q eÜ Av Q| hw` evKx KvR kl bv nq Z e iv¯ vwU ev` c i hv e| `vwqZ¡: PAST Ges CSO|

weMZ mfvi wm×v : 1. hme iv¯ v wewfb Kvi b cÖKí cwiKíbv gvZv eK Kiv nqwb mme iv¯ vi 2q wKw¯ i UvKv AvbycvwZK nv i Kgv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 2. Contract sign nIqvi Av M mswkó MÖv gi Rwgi gvwjK ì Rwg cÖ`v bi welqwU wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 3. hme MÖv gi iv¯ vi ZvwjKv MÖvgevmx KZ© K CAP Gi gva¨ g Pzov Kiv n q Q Zvi ZvwjKv mswkó BDGbI K w` Z n e hv Z H iv¯ vi KvR BDwbqb cwil` MÖnY bv K i| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 4. hme BDwbqb cwil` Pqvig¨vb CAP G A f©~³ iv¯ vi ZvwjKvq ¯ ^v¶i Ki Qb bv Zv ì ZvwjKv SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 2 wUDeI CSO, 2q eQ ii wKQy MÖv g Rbmvavi bi Rural Piped water qj PAST Pvwn`v Abyhvqx Mfxi bjK~c Ìqv hvq Pvjy Kivi Rb¨ Ges wKbv G wel q CSO cÖwZwbwa SDF Gi GKwU MÖv g SDF ` wó AvKl©b Ki j SDF Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq cÖv_wgKfv e cÖK Z cÖ qvRb _vK j AímsLK Mfxi Av jvPbv Kiv bjK~c Ìqv h Z cv i| Z e m ¶ Î n q Q| wb b¥v³ welq¸ jv we ePbv Ki Z n e: PvPxqv gxiMÄ 1. Kvb Ae¯ v ZB bjK~c e¨vw³ MÖv g bjK~c gvwjKvbvq h Z cvi ebv| ¯ vcb GL bv 2. cÖwZwU bjK~ ci DcKvi fvMx m¤¢e nqwb| n e Kgc ¶ 40-50wU cwievi| 3. KwgDwbwU Kw UªweDkbG mevi AskMÖnY wbwðZ Ki Z n e| weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. PvPxqv gxiMÄ MÖv g AwZ`ª Z bjK~c ¯ vc bi eë¯ v Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST Ges CSO|

113

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 3 gvwmK PAST PAST Gi c¶ _ K MZ deª qvixÕ05 Gi AMÖM Ges Kvh©µg eY©bv Kiv nq| wZ CSO 1g eQi ii MÖvg¸ jv Z AMÖMwZ wbæi c: - gvU 91 wU iv¯ v Dc-cÖK íi g a¨ KvR kyi n q Q gvU 88wUi| - gvU 65 wU cvBc KvjfvU© Dc-cÖK íi g a¨ KvR ïi n q Q 50wUi| - 12 wU e·-KvjfvU© Dc-cÖK íi g a¨ KvR ïi n q Q 8 wUi| - gvU 81 wU bjK~c Dc-cÖKí Hand over Kiv n q Q |

2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvZ AMÖMwZ wbæi c: - GmwWGd _ K cvIqv gvU 186wU Dc-cÖK íi g a¨ G¨vcÖvBRvj Kiv n q Q 94wU| CSO Kv-AwW© bUi wb R ì Kvh©µ gi eY©bvq MZ deª qvixÕ05 Gi wbæi c AMÖMwZ Zz j a ib: 1. wcGgwm MVb Kiv n q Q 08wU| 2. Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv cÖ¯ Z Ges SDF-G Rgv`vb Kiv n q Q 45wU| 3. Leadership development Ges Institution building Gi Dci wfwWwm m`m¨ ì 3wU e¨vP K cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n q Q| 4. e¨v¼ wnmve Lvjv n q Q 50wU| 5. wfwWwm-i gvwmK mfv Av qvRb Kiv n q Q 251wU| 6. Dc-cÖKí ev¯ evqb Kiv n Q 60wU Mªv g (1g eQi) | 7. Community Contribution msMÖn Kiv n q Q 60wU MÖv g (2q eQi)| 8. wcGgwm-i mv _ Dc-cÖKí ev¯ evq bi Rb¨ Pzw³ Kiv n q Q 39wU MÖv g (2q eQi)| 9. mvavib wnmve i¶Y Ges eë¯ vcbvi Dci wcGgwm m`m¨ ì 5wU e¨vP K cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n q Q| 10. Dc-cÖKí ev¯ evqb Kiv n Q 35wU Mªv g (2q eQi)|

114

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 4 1g PO PO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq cÖ_g eQ ii me eQ ii (TMSS) MÖv gi mfv wbqwgZ AbywôZ n Q MÖvg Ges wK Ø Ø hy³ MÖvg ¸ jv Z cwic~Y© Db qb CSO AskMÖnY n Q bv| KwgwU i mfv 6 Dc- CSO, SDF Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq Dc-cÖKí ev¯ 2q eQ ii cÖKí PAST, evq b wcGgwm hw` mgm¨vi m wó K i MÖvg¸ jv Z Dc- aviYv Ges Z e wKQz wKQz ¶ Î cix¶vgyjK fv e cÖK íi KvR SDF wfwWwm Gi gva¨ g KvR ev¯ evqb Kiv D Øva bi mgq h Z cv i| m ¶ Î wb æv³ welq ¸ jv wfwWwm, we ePbv Ki Z n e| wcGgwm Ges 1. wfwWwmi m`m¨/m`m¨v ì wb q MÖvgevmx ì GKwU mve-KwgwU n e| Dcw¯ wZ wbwðZ 2. e¨vsK GKvD U n e wfwWwm Gi Kiv n Q| bv g| Dc-cÖK íi KvR 3. Kvb wfwWwm mfvcwZ Dc-cÖKí ïi nIqvi Av M ev¯ evq b mswkó _vK eb bv| wcGgwm K PMA Gi cÖ k i Rev e SDF Gi c¶ _ K wnmve i¶b Ges ejv nq ga¨ ejKvq gv K©U kW Gi Kv Ri gvb cwie Z© ¯ zj ms¯ vi Kiv n e| wbwðZ Kivi Rb¨ CSO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq mv`yj¨vcy i cÖwk¶b Ìqv mvbvjx e¨vs K UvKv w` Z wewfb n e| ARynv Z ìx Ki Q Ges wKQy wKQy MÖv gi Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebvq f~j _vKvq wcGgwm Pzw³ Ki Z Pv Qbv| SDF _ K G wel q eë¯ v bIqv n e e j ejv nq| SDF _ K ejv nq wKkvgZ njw`qv MÖv g ¯ ^v¶i RvwjqvZxi NUbvi Rb¨ mLvbKvi me Dc-cÖKí ev¯ evqb eÜ _vK e| wm×v t 1. h me wcGgwm eZ©gv b Uªwbs cv Q Zv ì K ïay gvÎ Technical aspect G wnmve i¶ Yi Dci Avevi cÖwk¶Y w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST 2. GmwWGd Gi wbKU h me MÖv gi KwgDwbwU Kw UªweDkb kZfvM msMÖn n q Q Zvi ZvwjKv Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO| 3. D PZi wk¶v cÖwZôvb hgb K jR, ev ¯ zj I K jR -G Kvb Dc-cÖKí ev¯

115

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ evqb Kiv hv ebv| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 4. 10/03/05 Gi g a¨ 2qeQ ii MÖvg¸ jvi me Dc-cÖKí Zix K i 15/03/05 Gi g a¨ SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 5. wcGgwm K wnmve i¶ Yi Dci AwZ`ªyZ cÖwk¶Y w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 6. Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv Zixi mgq mZK©Zv Aej¤^b Ki Z n e hv Z f~j bv nq| `vwqZ¡t PAST| weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. AvMvgx 15/02/05 Gi g a¨ gvwUi KvR msµv mKj Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv Ges 28/02/05 Gi g a¨ 2q eQ ii MÖvg¸ jvi mKj Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO Ges PAST | 2. gvU 69wU Dc-cÖK íi Community contribution 100% collection n q M Q m¸ jvi G¨v cÖBR¸ jv AMÖvwaKvi cÖ`vb Ki Z n e Ges 15/02/05 Gi g a¨ m¤úb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 3. e¨v¼ GKvD U Lvjvi Rb¨ iRy jk b Kgc ¶ wcGgwmGi `yB-Z Zxqvsk m` mï mB _vK Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 4. hme Dc-cÖK íi dvÛ wiwjR Kiv n q Q mme wcGgwm K wnmve i¶Y Gi Dci `ª Z cÖwk¶ Yi eë¯ v Ki Z n e Ges nv Z Kj g kLv Z n e|| `vwqZ¡t CSO Ges PAST| 5. ga¨ ejKvq hw` BDwbqb cwil ì Rb¨ wba©vwiZ Rwg ev ` Ab¨ Rwg cvIqv bv hvq Z e G Dc-cÖKí evwZj n q hv e Ges m ¶ Î H MÖvg Ab¨ Dc-cÖKí c Z cv i Z e Zvi cÖ¯ vebv AwZ`ª Z cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 6. CSO Ges PAST Gi wdì BwÄwbqviM Yi Dc-cÖKí cwigv ci UvKvq 10%Gi ekx eëavb _vK ebv| 7. hme wcGgwm wj÷ gvZv eK DcKiY µq Ki Qbv

116

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ Zv ì ZvwjKv SDF G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PAST| 8. Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebvi mv _ BDwbqb cwil ì QvocÎ I LvmRwgi wel q Aby gv`b _vK Z n e| `vwqZ¡t CSO| 16 gvP©Õ PAST CSO Gi c¶ _ K gvP© 2005 Gi 05 Ges Kg©cwiKíbvq ejv nq: gv mi CSO 1. wcGgwm MVb n e 20wU Kg©cwi 2. Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ vebv cÖ¯ ywZ Ges Kíbv GmwWGd-G Rgv`vb n e 20wU 4. wcGgwmi wnmvei¶Y welqK cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb Kiv n e 5wU 5. e¨vsK wnmve Lyj Z mn hvwMZv cÖ`vb Kiv n e 20wU 6. KwgDwbwU Aby`vb msMª n mn hvwMZv cÖ`vb Kiv n e 60wU 7. wfwWwmi gvwmK mfvi Av qvRb Kiv n e 251wU 8. gvVch©v q Dc-cÖKí ev¯ evqb Kiv n e 60wU MÖv g (wØZxq eQi) 9. `jxq MwZkxjZv I bZ Z¡ welqK cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb Kiv n e 11wU e¨vP| 10. gvVch©v q Dc-cÖKí ev¯ evqb Kiv n e 60wU MÖv g (cÖ_g eQi)| 21 gvwmK PO PO (TMSS) wb R ì Kvh©µ gi eY©bvq AMÖM (TMSS) MZ deª qvix gv m m¤úvw`Z mKj wZ Kv Ri wjwLZ Z_¨ mieivn K ib Ges Zvi Dci Av jvPbv K ib| wb æ Av jvPbvi D jL hvM¨ Askmg~n Zz j aiv nj: - Cultural program Av qvRb Kiv n q Q 24wU| - Skill training Gi AvIZvq Mvfx cvj bi Dci 6wU e¨vP, QvMj cvj bi Dci 1wU e¨vP Ges Mi gvUvZvRv KiY I nvum- gyiMx cvj bi Dci 4wU e¨P K 3w`b e¨vcx Pzov cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n q Q| - wUKv Ìqvi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n q Q 120wU| - m PZbZv Zixi gva¨ g ¯ ^v¯ ¨m¤§Z cvqLvbv ¯ vcb Kiv n q Q 1,224wU| - 362Rb ¯ zj weg~L Ges wkky kªwgK Gi ¯ z j cyb:fwZ© wbwðZ Kiv n q Q|

117

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ - m PZbZv Zixi Rb¨ MÖvg ¯ ^ Qv mexMY m¨vwb Uk bi Dci cvov wfwËK 120wU Av jvPbv/DVvb eVK K ib| - 25wU Theme based case Gi Dci Z_¨ msMÖn Ges mgvavb Kiv n q Q| - Rb¥ 162wU, g Zÿ 60wU Ges weevn iwR óªkb 109wU iKW© Kiv n q Q | - wUKv cÖ`v bi AvIZvi evB i _vKv 141Rb wkï K wUKv cÖ`vb Kiv n q Q| - MÖvg Db qb KwgwUi mfv n q Q 61wU| - Good governence Dci Advocacy program Kiv n q Q 144wU mk bi gva¨ g| - 8wU BDwbq bi BDwbqb cwil` m`m¨, wfwWwm m`m¨, Change Agent Ges MÖv gi cÖfvkvjx e¨w³ ì mv _ Good governence Dci wgwUs Kiv n q Q| - Ø Ø wbim bi Dci 4wU e¨vP K cÖwk¶Y `qv n q Q| 22 Ab¨vb¨ CSO, Rb¥wbh ¿Y Rvi`vi Kivi Rb¨ webv gy j¨ Report card eënvi Z_¨ PO miKvix DcKiY mg~n GjvKvq weZiY Kiv wb `©kbvi Dci (TMSS), hvq wKbv G cÖm ½ wcGgG cªwZwbwa wcGgG PO PAST, mfvi ` wó AvKl©b Ki j GmwWGd Gi c¶ (TMSS) Kg©x ì PO _ K ejv nq h, G e¨cv i miKvix GKw` bi (BEES) ms¯ v K Kv R jvMv bvB fvj| KviY PO cÖwk¶Y Ges wKQyw`b c i GjvKvq KvR Ki e bv| w` q Qb| SDF wm×v : 1. h 8 wU BDwbqb cwil ` Good governance Gi Dci wgwUs n q Q Zvi Dci Avjv`v wi cvU© Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 2. Good governance Gi wgwUs Gi ci BDwbqb cwil` KZUzKy MwZkxj n q Q ( hgb Ki msMÖn, 13 wU ó¨wÛs KwgwU MwVZ nj wKbv), Zvi d jvAvc Ki Z n e|

118

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 2. MÖv g Ab¨vb¨ wel qi Dci GW fv Kmx cÖvMÖvg Gi cvkvcvwk cwievi cwiKíbvi Dci Rvi w` Z n e| 23 gvV CSO, PO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, ewki fvM PO (TMSS) ch©v q PAST, jvK cÖwk¶Y c qB Lykx| Z e wKQy gvwmK i PO wKQy jvK Lvivc Performence Ki Q g b wi c©v Ui mv _ AwfÁZv (TMSS) K i cÖwk¶ Y AvmvB Q o w` q Q | wbqwgZ gvV I wkLb Ges ZvQvov AviI ejv nq h, GK Rb ch©v qi AwfÁZv SDF cÖwk¶vYv_x© nvum-gyiMx cvj bi I wkLb wjwLZ cÖwk¶Y wb q wmW& gvwb cvIqvi AvKv i SDF G Av MB ¯ ^-D `¨v M nvum-gyiMx cvjb ïi mieivn Ki Q| K i Qb| ZvQvov Kvk`n MÖv g wfwWwm 8wU Mi cÖwk¶Yv_x© ì eM©v/Avax w` q Qb, cÖwZcvjb Kivi Rb¨| G cÖm ½ GmwWGd _ K ejv nq h, G ai bi eM©v/Avaxi gva¨ g cÖwZcvjb K DrmvwnZ Ki Z n e| KviY Gi c eë¯ vq Dfq c¶B jvfevb nq| wm×v : 1. `y ai cÖvPzh©Zv _vK j Chilling plant ¯ vcb Kiv hvq wKbv Zvi m¤¢ve¨Zv hvPvB Ki Z n e Ges m¤¢ve¨ wewb qvMKvix Luz R ei Kivi Póv Kiv n e| `vwqZ¡ : PO 24 wi c©v PO, wi cvU© KvW© Ges Good Governence U PMA welqK wi cvU© KvW© Gi Dci wcGgG KvW© Ges Ges wUGgGmGm, PO Kg©x e ` K SDF cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb K i Qb| 32 gvP©Õ PO PO (TMSS) Gi c¶ _ K gvP© gv mi 05 Gi (TMSS) Kg© cwiKíbvq ejv nq: Kg©cwi Ges - nZ`wi`ª kªbxi 363wU MÖ ci mfv Kíbv SDF Av qvRb Kiv n e| - wewfb welq wfwËK Cultural program Av qvRb Kiv n e 21wU| - Skill training Gi AvIZvq Mvfx cvj bi Dci 10wU e¨v P 300 Rb K, Mi gvUvZvRv KiY Gi Dci 5wU e¨vP K, QvMj cvjb Gi Dci 1wU e¨vP K Ges QvU eëmv eë¯ vcbvi Dci 1wU e¨vP K 3w`b e¨vcx Pzov cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb Kiv n e| - wUKv cÖ`v bi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n e 60wU|

119

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ - Good governance Gi Dci Advocacy program Kiv n e 96wU | - 180Rb Change agent Kg©x K Good governance welqK Report card Gi Dci Iwi q Ukb Ìqv n e| - 60wU Theme based case Gi Dci Z_¨ msMÖn Kiv n e| - MÖvg Db qb KwgwUi mfv Av qvRb Kiv n e 61wU| - Conflict resolution Gi Rb¨ wewfb wfwWwm _ K wbe©vwPZ 3wU e¨v P (35 R bi e¨vP) cÖwk¶Y Ìqv n e| - MÖvg ¯ ^ Qv mexMY Feild Facilitator Gi mnvqZvq Rb¥, g Zÿ, weevn iwR óªkb Ges m¨vwb Uk bi Dci cÖwZ MÖv g cvov wfwËK m PZbZv g~jK Av jvPbv/DVvb eVK Ki eb Ges gwbUwis eB qi gva¨ g 60wU MÖv gi Z_¨ msi¶Y Ki eb| - 300 Rb ¯ zj weg~L Ges wkky kªwgK Gi ¯ z j fwZ© wbwðZ Kiv n e| - wi cvU KvW© Ges Good governance Gi Dci 180wU MÖ c K Iwi q Ukb Ìqv n e | - 60 wU MÖv g mwb Uk bi Dci mvBb evW© Ìqv n e | 36 wmW& PO GmwWGd _ K ejv nq wek¦ e¨vs Ki gvwb (TMSS) mv _ Av jvPbv cieZ©x Z nZ`wi`ª ì cÖ`vb Ges wmW gvwb cÖ`v bi wm×v n q Q| SDF MÖv gi Ae¯ v we ePbv K i cÖ_g eQ i wb×©vwiZ 1200 Rb nZ`wi`ª K wmW& gvwb cÖ`vb Kiv n e| hw` 2q eQ ii 1200 R bi Rb¨ A c¶v Kiv nq Z e wmW& gvwb cÖ`v b ìx n q hv e| wm×v : 1. cÖwk¶Y ïi nIqvi mgq cÖwk¶Yv_©x ì cwi¯ vi K i ej Z n e gvU 80% cÖwk¶Yv_©x wmW& gvwb cv eb| `vwqZ¡: PO 37 Rb¥, PO Rb¥ Ges g Zyï iwR Uªk bi ¶ Î g Zÿ (TMSS) kZfvM mdjZv G m Q| weev ni ¶ Î Ges Ges wn `y we qi Kvi b kZfvM mdjZv nq bvB weevn SDF Kvib wn `y ì we q iwRwóª Kiv nq bv|

120

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ iwR ó ªkb 38 m¨vwb PO wm×v : Lvbvevox Z Ukb (TMSS) 1. m¨vwb Ukb Achivement Gi Rb¨ kZfvM Kg©m~ Ges cvov/MÖv gi hyeK hyeZx Ges wK kvi- mwb Ukb Px SDF wK kvix ì K DØy× Ki Z n e Ges AwR©Z n q Q| m¤¢ve¨ me Dcv qi gva¨ g gv P©i g a¨ MÖvgevwm ì g a¨ m PZbZv m wó evKx wZbwU Ki Z n e| MÖv g kZfvM `vwqZ¡: PO AwR©Z n e| 2. g Wj MÖvg¸ jv Z 31/03/05 Gi g a¨ kZfvM m¨vwb Ukb wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. GLb _ K gvwmK wfwË Z 60wU MÖv gi m¨vwb Ukb wi c©vU SDF G Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 2. wPK&wb MÖv g Avevi bZzb K i m¨vwb Ukb Kg©m~Pxi Dci PRA ïi Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 3. Low cost sanitary latrine Gi `vg Abyhvqx cÖwZMÖv g myweav ewÂZ ì QqwU fv M fvM K i gvwU fU Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 40 wk¶v PO ekx eq mi Kvi Y A bK QvÎB ¯ z j Kvh©µg (TMSS) fwZ© n Z cv iwb| GmwWGd _ K GB Ges g g© ejv nq h, gvP© gvm ch© SDF h nZz fwZ©i my hvM Av Q mRb¨ G Kvh©µg Rvi`vi Ki Z n e| wm×v : 1. h me S i cov Ges ¯ zj wegyL wkï ¯ z j fwZ© nqwb Zvi wi cvU© GmwWGd-G cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡ : PO | weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. ¯ z j wk¶K ¯ ^íZv, Abycw¯ wZ BZ¨vw` Kvi Y QvÎ-QvÎxiv wbi rmvwnZ n q c o Zvi ciI cyb:fwZ©K Z QvÎ-QvÎxiv hv Z wbqwgZ ¯ z j hvq Zvi Rb¨ m ©v P Póv Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)|

121

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 2. cÖKí GjvKvi A ©f~³ ¯ zj¸ jv Z mswk•ó Dc Rjvi wbe©vnx Kg©KZ©vi mnvqZvq `ª Z eB weZi Yi eë¯ v MÖnY Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 3. hme ¯ z j AwZwi³ QvÎ-QvÎxi Kvi Y bZzb QvÎ fwZ© Z Abxnv `Lv Q mme ZvwjKv wb q Dc Rjv wk¶v Kg©KZ©vi mnvqZvq mgvavb Ki Z n e| Zv ZI hw` mgm¨vi mgvavb bv nq, Zvn j m me ¯ z ji ZvwjKv GmwWGdG cvVv Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 41 mvs¯ PO PO (TMSS) Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, Local GLbI Kvb wZK (TMSS) talents ì wb q BDwbqb wfwËK `j MVb mvs¯ wZK cÖvM Ges Kiv n q Q Ges mvs¯ wZK Abyôv b Abyôvb wfwWI Övg SDF Zviv Ask MÖnY Ki Q| Kiv nqwb| wm×v t mvs¯ wZK Abyôv bi Rb¨ cÖwZwU MÖvg _ K ¯ vbxq RbM Yi Ask MÖnY _vK Z n e| `vwqZ¡ : PO | 42 wUKv PO PO Gi gvwmK wi cv U© ¯ ^ Qvq wUKv wUKv`vb `vb (TMSS) MÖnbKvix wkïi msL¨v hvM bv Kivi Kg©m~Px Kg©m~ Ges Kvi b Rb¥ MÖnY Ges wUKv MÖn Yi Ae¨vnZ ivL Z Px SDF g a¨ GKUv eo eëavb i q Q| n e Ges wm×v t beRvZK ì 1. wi cv U© ¯ ^ Qvq wUKv MÖnbKvix wUKv`vb wbwðZ wkïi msL¨v hvM Ki Z n e| Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡ : PO | weMZ mfvi wm×v t 1. wUKv `vb Kg©m~Px Z miKvix Kg©KZ©v/Kg©Pvix ì hZ ekx m¤¢e mswkó Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO (TMSS)| 43 ¯ ^v¯ ¨ TAT, G ch© ¯ ^v¯ ¨ mevq Kgb mvov mev HPO, cvIqv hv Q Zvi wel q GmwWGd _ K CSO Rvb Z PvIqv n j GBPwcI Ges U¨vU Gi Ges PO c¶ _ K ejv nq h, m ev© P 162 Rb (TMSS) wkï GK w` b wUKv wb q Q Ges cÖwZ wK¬wbK W Z kZvwaK UvKv wfwWwm GKvD U ivMx `Lv eve` Rgv nq| wm×v : 1. MÖv gi m¨v UjvBU wK¬wb K

122

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ cÖ_ g c¨viv gwW· ivMx `L e| ciewZ© Z ïaygvÎ Referral Gi ¶ Î GgweweGm Wv³vi ivMx `L eb| 2. wfwWwm Gi e¨vsK GKvD U Ri ix wfwË Z Lyj Z n e Ges wPwKrmv mev jä Avq GKvD U Rgvi eë¯ v Ki Z n e| 3. `y Uv Static Clinic AwZkxNÖB me Instrument w` q mvRv Z n e| 4. PO Gi MÖvg ¯ ^ Qv mweiv GBPwcI Ges U¨vU Gimv _ h _fv e EPI, Family Planning, Satellite Clinic G h _fv e Dcw¯ Z _vK eb| 44 KwgDw CSO, weMZ mfvi wm×v : bwU PO 1. e¨v ¼ mÂqx wnmve bv Lvjv ch© Kw Uªw (TMSS) KwgDwbwU Kw UªweDkb msMÖn Kiv eDkb Ges hv ebv| SDF 45 wfwWw CSO, `ª Z Dc-cÖKí ev¯ evqb m¤¢e Kivi Rb¨ m I PO wKmvgZ evMwP, wKmvgZ me©vb `, wcGgw (TMSS) c~e© ejKv BZ¨vw` MÖv g A mi Ø ` Ges ©wbwnZ Ø Ø wggvsmv Kivi Rb¨ PO SDF (TMSS) K Aby iva Kiv nq| 46 AvBbx PO wm×v : mnvqZv (TMSS) Kv U©i gva¨ g h KmwU mgvavb Kvh©µg Ges Kiv n q Q Zvi wi cvU© GmwWGd G SDF Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 47 gvwmK TAT MZ deª qvix gv m HPO Ges TAT Gi AMÖM Ges Kvh©µg Zz j aiv nj: Zx HPO 1| cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv gi wfwWwmi Ìqv ZvwjKv Abyhvqx `vBgv wbe©vPY Ges cÖ_g e¨v P `yBwU BDwbq b gvU 20 Rb `vBgv K cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb| 2| cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv g Aew¯ Z 5wU nvB¯ z j ¯ zj nj_ Kvh©µg ïi | 3| cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv g B Zvg a¨ 9wU KwgDwbwU dv g©wm cÖwZôv | 4| cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv gi wfwWwmi Ìqv ZvwjKv Abyhvqx MÖvg Wv³vi wbe©vPb Ges cÖ_g e¨v Pi cÖwk¶Y ïi | 5| cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv g ivMx `Lv ïi | 6| cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv gi wfwWwmi Ìqv ZvwjKv Abyhvqx ¯ ^v¯ ¨ Kgx©

123

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ wbe©vPb Ges cÖ_g e¨v P cÖwk¶Y ïi | 48 gvwmK TAT HPO wUgjxWvi AvMvgx gvP© gv mi Kg©cwi Ges cwiKíbvq e jb: Kíbv HPO 1. cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv gi `vBgvi Ask MÖn Y Kgc ¶ 2wU e¨v P cÖwk¶Y mgvß Kiv n e| 2. cÖKí GjvKvi mKj nvB¯ z j ¯ zj nj_ welqG K¬vm Av qvRb Kiv n e| 3. cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv g Kgc ¶ 2wU K i KwgDwbwU dv g©mx ¯ vcb Kiv n e| 4. wfwWwm cÖ`Ë ZvwjKv Abyhvqx Mªvg Wv³vi cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb Kiv n e| 5. wfwWwm cÖ`Ë ZvwjKv Abyhvqx ¯ ^v¯ ¨Kg©x ì cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb Kiv n e| 6. ch©vqµ g cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv g ivMx `Lv I eë¯ v cÎ cÖ`vb Kiv n e| 7. wcI Ges wmGmI ì mv _ Kg©cwiKíbv mg¤^q K i Kvh©µg ev¯ evqb Kiv n e| 8. ¯ vbxq miKvix I emiKvix ¯ ^v¯ ¨ ms¯ vi mv _ wbqwgZ hvMv hvM I wewfb mgvR mev gyjK Kv R Ask MÖnY Kiv n e| 9. cÖKí GjvKvi mKj MÖv g eBRjvBb mv f©i ch© e¶Y Kiv n e| 10. d¨vwgwj c¨vwbs m¨v UjvBU wK¬wb Ki Av hvRb Kiv n e| 11. ¯ zj _ K S o cov wkï ì ¯ ^v¯ ¨ wk¶v welqK cÖwk¶Y cÖ`vb Kiv n e|

49 nZ`wi`ª PO PO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, nZ`wi`ª ì MÖ c (TMSS) MÖ c ¸ jv cÖwk¶Y wb Z Drmvn nvwi q Ges dj Q Ges Kvb Kvb MÖ c mÂq ïi SDF Ki Z Pv Q| GmwWGd _ K G cÖm ½ ejv nq, wc KGmGd Gi mv _ ¯ ^í my ` FY cÖ`v bi Rb¨ Av jvPbv Pj Q Ges AwZ kxNÖ Zv ì F bi eë¯ v Kiv m¤¢e n e e j Avkv Kiv hvh| wm×v : 1. nZ`wi`ª ì MÖ ç jv K a i ivLvi Rb¨ wbqwgZ wgwUs G AskMÖnY wbwðZ Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡ : PO

124

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

µwgK welq hvi Av jvPbvi weeiY cieZx© djvdj bs R b¨ cÖ hv R¨ 2. nZ`wi`ª MÖ ci mÂq AviI msMwVZ nIqvi c i ïi Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡ : PO 50 gwbUwi PO PO Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, MÖvg s eyK (TMSS) ¯ ^ Qv mexMY Feild Facilitator Gi Ges mnvqZvq Rb¥, g Zÿ, weevn iwR óªkb SDF Ges m¨vwb Uk bi Dci 60wU MÖv gi wewfb Z_¨ msMÖn K ib Ges Zv gwbUwis eB qi gva¨ g wbqwgZ msi¶Y Ki eb| wm×v : wfwWwm wgwUs G gwbUwis eyK Gi AMÖMwZ wb q Av jvPbv Ki Z n e Ges Zv iRÿwjk&b AvKv i wjwLZ ivL Z n e| `vwqZ¡ : PO me© k l wR Gg ( cÖvMÖvg) e jb KvR ev¯ evqb `ª ZZi Ki Z n e| Avi Kvb Av jvPbv bv _vKvq mKj K abëv` Rvwb q wZwb mfvi mgvwß NvlYv K ib| mfvi Av jvP¨ m~Px 13. deª qvix 2005 gv mi AMÖMwZ| 14. gvP© 2005 Gi Kg© cwiKíbv| 15. weMZ gvm¸ jvi wkLb |

mfvq Dcw¯ Z e¨w³eM© SDF : w R G g ( cÖvMÖvg), g¨v bRvi (m¨vc), g¨v bRvi (wmwW) Ges g¨v bRvi ( UKwbK¨vj) | CSO : c Ö K í m g ^qKvix, 5 Rb wdì mycvifvBRvi| PO (TMSS) : cÖKí mg ^qKvix, mnKvix cÖKí mg ^qKvix, Uªwbs mg ^qKvix, 3 Rb mnKvix Uªwbs Awdmvi Ges 4 Rb wdì mycvifvBRvi| PAST : wUg wjWvi Ges 13 Rb wdì BwÁwbqvi| TAT : 1 Rb civgk©K| HPO : 1 Rb wUgwjWvi Ges 1 Rb gwWK¨vj Awdmvi| PMA : wmwbqi wimvm© Awdmvi Ges wimvm© Awdmvi| PO (BEES) : cÖKí mg ^qKvix |

125

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

(gyn¤§` Avey Zv ni Lvb) Rbv ij g¨v bRvi ( cÖvMÖvg) Gm wW Gd |

weZiY

126

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

10.3.7 Monthly/Quarterly Coordination Meeting Minutes, Code no. QCM D- 2/January 2005, Dhaka

mvk¨vj Bb fó g U cÖvMÖvg cÖ R± ÎgvwmK (A ±vei-wW m¤^iÕ04) Kvh©µg ch©v jvPbv mfvi Kvh©weeiYx, 16B RvbyqvixÕ 2005 ¯ vbt SDF m ¤§jb K¶, ebvbx, XvKv|

SIPP Gi AvbyôvwbK wØZxq ÎgvwmK mg ^q mfv 16B Rvbyqvix 2004 Zvwi L SDF Gi m ¤§jb K ¶ AbywôZ nq| mKj K be l©i ï f Qvi Rvwb q GmwWGd Gi eë¯ vcbv cwiPvjK mfvi KvR ïi K ib| mfvq g~jZt ÎgvwmK Kv Ri AMÖMwZ ch©v jvPbv, cÖKí ïi I ev¯ evqbKvjxb mg q wewfb mgm¨v wPwýZKiY I m¤¢ve¨ mgvavb, cÖK íi wk¶Yxq welq mg~n chv© jvPbv, wek¦ e¨vs Ki cÖKí GjvKv cwi`k©b I cÖvß Z _ï Dci Av jvPbv Kiv nq| mfvq Dcw¯ Z wQ jb SDF, PO, CSO, PAST, PMA, HPO, Ges TAT Gi cÖwZwbwae `| mfvq mfvcwZZ¡ K ib mvk¨vj W fjc g U dvD Ûkb (GmwWGd) Gi eë¯ vcbv cwiPvjK Rbve Gg nvwdRDwÏb Lvb|

µg Av jvPbvi weeiY bs 1. welqt wgwUs wgwbUm& hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF, PO, CSO, PAST, PMA, HPO, Ges TAT Av jvPbv: wRGg ( cÖvMªvg) wewfb Av jvPbv I cÖwZ e`b msL¨vMZ w` Ki P q cÖK íi ¸bMZ w`K Zz j aivi Dci ¸i Z¡ Av ivc K ib| G cÖm ½ GgwW Kv Ri gvb K wePv ii Rb¨ mK ji Lvjv gjv gZvgZ cÖZ¨vkv K ib| GB cÖK íi mdjZvi Dci wfwË K i wek¦ e¨vsK Av iv cÖKí GjvKv I K ¤úv b U e w× Ki e e j Avk¦vm w` q Q e j wZwb mfv K Rvbvb| weMZ mfvwU 1g nIqvq wgwbUm& G Av jvPbvi wm×v I `vwqZ¡ my®úófv e jLv nqwb e j wZwb D jL K ib|

wm×v t GLb _ K cÖwZwU mfvi Kvh©weeiYx Z wm×v I `vwqZ¡ my®úófv e wjL Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PMA 2. welqt Kv Ri AMÖMwZ hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF, PO, CSO, PAST, PMA, HPO, Ges TAT Av jvPbv: CSO wUg wjWvi, Rvgvjcyi, Av jvPbvq D jL K ib h, PAST GLbI KvR ïi bv Kivq MªvgevmxM Yi A_© msMÖ ni Kvh©µg eZ©gv b Lye axi cÖwµqvq Pj Q| 190wU MÖv gi g a¨ 185wU MÖvg _ K iv¯ v mve-cÖ R± G m Q| ZvQvov wUDeI qj, ¯ zj, Lvj mve-cª R±I G m Q| gvU 235 Rb gwnjv Kvh©Kix KwgwU Z Av Q, Gi g a¨ nZ `wi`ª 37 Rb Ges `wi`ª 112 Rb| e¨vsK GKvD U Lvjv n q Q 94wU| MD,SDF e jb hw` Kg© GjvKvq 2-3wU MÖvg wg j Lvj Lbb Kiv hvq m ¶ Î AMÖvwaKvi `qv h Z cv i| Z e G ¶ Î MÖvgevmx `i AvMÖn I Kv Ri m¤¢ve¨Zv hvPvB Ki Z n e|

CSO wUg wjWvi, MvBevÜv, D jL K ib h, 1g eQ ii gvU 260wU Dc-cÖKí G¨v cÖBR Kiv n q Q|

127

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

2q eQ ii gvU 6wU Dc-cÖKí G¨v cÖBR Kiv n q Q| 2q eQ ii GKwU MÖv g cÖK íi KvR ïi n q Q|

PAST wUg wjWvi, Rvgvjcyi: eb¨vq ¶wZMÖ¯ iv¯ v 28wU| me¸ jv cyb:g~j¨vqb K i SDF G Rgv `qv n q Q| Av jvP¨ mve-cÖ R± ev¯ evqb wel q GKwU P~ov mgqmxgv wba©vi Yi cÖ qvRb| GgwW Rvbvb h, PAST, Rvgvjcyi, Dc-cÖKí `ª Z ev¯ evq bi Rb¨ µ¨vk cÖvMÖvg nv Z wb q Q| MvBevÜv ZI G ai Yi cÖvMÖvg bIqvi Rb¨ wZwb PAST MvBevÜv K e jb|

PAST wUg wjWvi, MvBevÜv: 1g eQ ii 42wU Dc-cÖK íi Avw_©K Aby`vb msMÖn GLbI evKx Av Q| 1g eQ ii 2wU Dc-cÖKí G¨v cÖBR Kiv evKx Av Q| wm×v t AvMvgx 15B deª qvixi g a¨ 1g eQ ii evKx Avw_©K Aby`vb msMÖn m¤úb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO

PO mg ^qKvix, Rvgvjcyi: ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤§Z cvqLvbvi Rb¨ gvwU fU Kiv n Q wK ev¯ evwqZ Kiv KóKi| wewfb Drm _ K wewfb mg q webvg~ j¨ cv Q weavq wbR D `¨v M Zv ev¯ evqb Kiv bv KwVb n q c o Q|

PO mg ^qKvix, MvBevÜv: m¨vwb Uk bi Rb¨ gwU fkb `qv n Q| Kg© GjvKvq cÖvq 40,000wU cwiev ii ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤§Z cvqLvbv wQj bv| Gi g a¨ 3,000wU cwievi K m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq Avbv M Q hv Zyjbvg~jK wePv i Kg| cyiv bv Ges bZzb weevn wbeÜb n Q| GgwW gZvgZ `b h, bvixi ¶gZvq b `b gvni I weevn we Q ì welqwU ¸i Z¡i mv _ `L Z n e| 3. welqt AwfÁZv I wk¶Y wewbgq hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF, PO, CSO, PAST, PMA, HPO, Ges TAT Av jvPbv: CSO mg ^qKvix, Rvgvjcyi, gvV ch©v qi mgm¨v¸ jv D jL K i e jb- VDC I PMC Ø Ø i q Q| wewfb KwgwU Z wb R ì g aÏ Ø Ø i q Q| Avevi KwgwU I MÖvgevmxi g a¨ Kv_vI Kv_vI Ø Ø Av Q| iv¯ v givg Zi Rb¨ cÖ qvRbxq gvwU w` Z Rwgi gvwj Ki UvKv PvIqv BZ¨vw` Kvb Kvb MÖv g i q Q| Z e Gme Awf hvM mZ¨ bq e j CSO mg ^qKvix Rvbvb| Awf hvM mg~n wjwLZ, g wLK I Uwj dv bi gva¨ g G m _v K| 1g eQ ii 60wU MÖv gi g a¨ Kgc ¶ 20wU MÖvg _ K Awf hvM G m Q| wKQy mgm¨v mswkó GjvKvq SDF cÖwZwbwa wM q Qb Ges welqmg~n mgvavbI n q Q| wRGg ( cÖvMÖvg) e jb, 1g eQ i IC cÖPviYv 2q eQ ii Zyjbvq fv jv n qwQj| ZvB 2q eQ i Av iv AwaK mgm¨v n Z cv i e j g b Kiv n Q|

wm×v t

128

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

Awf hvM¸ jvi mZ¨Zv hvPvB K i GmwWGd-G ZvwjKv cÖiY Ki Z n e| ZvwjKv Abyhvqx SDF.Gi mswkó Kg©KZ©vMY gvV cwi`k©b Ki eb| `vwqZ¡: SDF I CSO h mg¯ mgm¨v mgvavb n q Q m¸ jvi iKW© Ges wbim bi K kj wjwce× Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO Dc-cÖKí wKfv e ev¯ evqb n e Zv CSO Ges PAST GKmv _ e m Av jvPbv Ki e| `vwqZ¡: PAST I CSO CSO wUg wjWvi, MvBevÜv, D jL K ib h, wewfb KwgwU I KwgwUi wb R ì m`m¨ ì g a¨ Kvb Kvb MÖv g Ø Ø weivRgvb| c~e© `v gvìcyi Gi MÖvgevmx wfwWwmÕi wei × gvgjv K i Q| G wel q CSO Av`vjZ _ K GKwU bvwUk c q Q| wKQy myweavev`x jvK cÖ_ g IC Campaign G ¸i Z¡ `q bv| c i KwgwU MV bi mgq Zviv AvMÖnx n q D V KwgwU Z A f©~w³i Rb¨| wZwb Av iv D jL K ib h, RR Kv U©i bvwU ki Reve 7/8 w` bi g a¨ w` Z n e| Project Cycle Gi mgq Kg| 1g eQ ii MÖv g CF ì mnvqZvi cÖ qvRb i q Q| e¨vsK GKvD U Lyj Z eZ©gv b Kvb mgm¨v n Q bv| hLv b mvbvjx e¨vsK bB mLv b Ab¨ e¨vs K GKvD U Lvjv n Q| mvgvwRK Db q b evav Avm e, Zv `¶Zvi mv _ gvKv ejv Ki Z n e e j GgwW gZvgZ `b| RybÕ05 ch© CF ì Kg© gqv` evo Z cv i e j wZwb Rvbvb| wm×v t gvgjvi welqwU `ª Z mgvavb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO CF ì 1g eQ ii GjvKvq Kvh©Kvj e w× cÖ qvRb D jL K i mswkó CSO Gi c¶ _ K SDF eivei wPwV w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO

PAST wUg wjWvi, Rvgvjcyi, e jb h- 1g eQ ii Aewkó Dc-cÖKí mg~ ni 1g wKw¯ i UvKv K e Aegy³ Kiv n e Zvi P~ov mgqmxgv `iKvi| MZ gvwmK mfvq 3wU Kvjfv U©i wel q (MÖvgevmxMY KvjfvU© Pvqwb wK Zv GKv cÖ qvRb) MÖvgevmxi mv _ K_v ejvi Rb¨ CSO K Aby iva Kiv nq| RvbyqvixÕ05 I 15B deª qvixÕ05 Gi g a¨ 2q eQ ii KZ¸ jv Dc-cÖKí cvIqv hv e| c~e© KzUvgwb MÖv gi iv¯ v mgm¨v GLbI mgvav nqwb, KviY nq wKw¯ i UvKv Qvov nqwb |

Kvjfv U©i wel q MÖvgevmxM Yi mv _ Av jvPbv Pj Q Ges c~e©-KzUvgwb MÖv gi iv¯ vi wel q MÖvgevmxMY AvMvgx eyaevi em e e j CSO mg ^qKvix mfv K AewnZ K ib| c~e© KzUvgwb MÖv g 60% iv¯ vi KvR m¤úb n q Q weavq, 2q wKw¯

129

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report i UvKvi Rb¨ Aby gv`b `qv h Z cv i| PAST 2q wKw¯ i UvKv A a©K `Iqvi Rb¨ gZvgZ `q| m¤ú~b© w` j cieZx© Z mgm¨v `Lv w` Z cv i e j TL m `n cvlb K ib| 2q wKw¯ i m¤ú~Y© UvKv cÖ`v bi ci Kvb mgm¨v `Lv w` j Zvi Rb¨ PAST K `vqx Kiv n e bv e j GgwW mfvq D jL K ib Ges 2q wKw¯ Aegy³ Kivi mycvwik cÖ`v bi Rb¨ PAST Gi Uxg wjWvi K Aby iva K ib|

MÖvgevmxMY cÖKí ev¯ evq bi Rb¨ A_© Aby`vb K i Q- GwU GKwU cÖvwß| G welqwU PMAÔi c¶ _ K wek¦ e¨vsK Gi wbKU Zz j aiv DwPZ| mvd j¨i KmóvwW cÖ`vb mg~n Zy j ai j cÖK íi gqv` e w× c Z cv i| wm×v t CSO Ges PAST Av jvPbv K i cÖwZwU Kv Ri P~ov mgqmxgv wVK Ki e| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PAST SDF GKwU wPwV w` e h wbwÏ©ó Zvwi Li g a¨ Aby`v bi UvKv Rgv bv w` j Dc-cÖKí ev¯ evqb m¤¢e n e bv| `vwqZ¡: SDF 150wU Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ ve Rvbyqvixi g a¨ Ges evKx mg¯ Dc-cÖKí cÖ¯ ve 15B deª qvixi g a¨ Rgv w` Z n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO

PAST wUg wjWvi, MvBevÜv, e jb h- RvbyqvixÕ05 I 15B deª qvixÕ05 Gi g a¨ 2q eQ ii KZ¸ jv Dc-cÖKí cvIqv hv e Zv Rvbv cÖ qvRb| 1g eQ ii 42wU Dc-cÖK íi Avw_©K Aby`vb msMÖn GlbI h¸ jv evKx Av Q m¸ jv K e ev¯ evwqZ n e ZvI Rvbv cÖ qvRb| 1g eQ ii 2wU Dc-cÖK íi G¨v cÖBR Kiv evKx Av Q| wm×v t 130wU Dc-cÖKí Rvbyqvixi g a¨ Ges 15B deª qvixi g a¨ evKx mg¯ Dc- cÖKí Rgv `Iqv n e| `vwqZ¡: CSO ESDO I DDC GK mv _ e m G wel q Kg© cwiKíbv (PvU©) Zix Ki e| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PAST gvwUi KvR 15B deª qvixi g a¨ kl Ki Z n e| GRb¨ mKj CSO mg ^qKvix Ges mKj PAST Uxg wjWvi GK Î e m mg¯ Kv Ri mywbwÏ©ó ZvwiL wVK Ki eb| `vwqZ¡: CSO Ges PAST

PO mg ^qKvix, Rvgvjcyi, Rvbvb h- Uªwbs cÖvßiv m¤§vwb fvZv Pvq| Uªwbs Venue mgm¨vi welqI wZwb Zz j a ib| evi qvgvix, Rvgvjcyi, g W j Ab¨MÖv g cÖwk¶Y w` q KvR ïi Kiv ìKvi| G ¶ Î GUv GKwU IGAI n e| wewfb Kvh©µ g wfwWwm ì WvK Z nq G Z gv m Zv ì 8-12 Kg©wèm bó nq| mvgvwRK mnvqZv Kvh©µ gi Rb¨ cÖK íi mgq h _ó bq| Pzw³i gqv` evov Z n e|

130

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

MÖvgevmxMY h Drm n ZB ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤§Z cvqLvbv msMÖn Ki b bv Kb G wel q mwVKfv e m PZbZv Zix Ki Z n e e j GgwW gZvgZ `b| cviivgivgcy iI wfwWwm¸ jv wg j GKwU BDwbqb K i Q, Zv `i wb q evi qvgvix MÖv gi gZ ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤§Z cvqLvbv Zixi wel q c` ¶c bIqv h Z cv i e j CSO cÖwZwbwa Rvbvb|

wm×v t ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤§Z cvqLvbvi wel q wewfb Dr mi m ½ hvMv hvM ¯ vcY Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡t PO mswkó MÖv g m¨vwb Uk b miKvix Aby`vb i q Q wK-bv Zv LwZ q `Lv n e| `vwqZ¡t SDF

PO mg ^qKvix, MvBevÜv, D jL K ib h- m¨vwb Uk bi Rb¨ gvwU fkb `qv n Q| Kg© GjvKvq cÖvq 40,000wU cwiev ii ¯ ^v¯ ¨ m¤§Z cvqLvbv wQj bv| Gi g a¨ 3,000wU cwievi K m¨vwb Uk bi AvIZvq Avbv M Q hv Zyjbvg~jK wePv i Kg| Ì Wvev I ga¨ kvnevRcyi, MÖv gi wKQy jvK Zv ì Kgx© K Rights & Law Gi Dci KvR bv Kivi Rb¨ e jb| Zuv ì MÖv g KvR Ki Z `qv n e e j Zviv Rvbvb| cÖwZw`b G ai Yi wgwUs Kb Kiv nq Ges Zv Z g q ì wK jvf nq KwgDwbwUi GKwU jvK Zv wRÁvmv K ib| MÖ c _ K GKRb gwnjv Zv cÖ qvRb Av Q e j Rvbvq| G Z K i Zviv Zv ì AwaKv ii welqwU fvjfv e eyS Z cvi Q Ges ¯ ^v¯ ¨ welqK A bK wKQy wkL Z cvi Q| wm×v t ¯ vbxq ûgwK mwVK wK-bv Zv fvjfv e hvPvB Ki Z n e Ges Zv ¸i Z¡i mv _ wb Z n e| cÖ qvR b SDF _ K mnvqZv Ìqv n e| 4. welqt KwgDwbwU Dc-cÖKí hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF, PO, CSO, PAST, PMA, HPO, Ges TAT Av jvPbv: SDF - Gi c¶ _ K ejv nq h, iv¯ v Dc-cÖKí ekx Avm Q e j wek¦ e¨vsK gZvgZ `q| IC cÖPviYvq iv¯ v ekx ¸i Z¡ c q Q| wewfb ai Yi Dc-cÖKí Avmv DwPZ| CSOÕi GK cÖ k i Rev e SDF gZvgZ `q h, cyivZb MÖv gI KwgDwbwU Dc-cÖK í Avw_©K mnvqZv `qv h Z cv i| Z e 190wU MÖv g hLv b CAP n q Q mLv b wKfv e GUv m¤¢e Zv CSO Rvb Z Pvq| `ya, Avbvi mi im BZ¨vw` evRviRvZ wel q Dc-cÖKí fvev h Z cv i| Gme `ªe¨ ` ki wewfb Kv¤úvwb Z ( hgb: cÖvb Kv¤úvwb) Ìqv h Z cv i| Z e fvjfv e Gi m¤¢ve¨Zv hvPvB K i `L Z n e| PO mg ^qKvix cyKzi Dc-cÖKí K_v D jL Kivq GgwW Gi m¤¢ve¨Zv hvPvB Ki Z e jb| kvK&-mwâ hgb: Kwc I e¸b g my gi ïi ZB Drcvw`Z n j ¶wZi m¤§yLxb n e bv| KviY, g my gi ïi Z evRv i fv jv `vg cvIqv hv e| ZvB Gme cÖKí Kivi ¶ Î evRv ii w`KwU f e g my gi ïi ZB Kiv ìKvi|

GgwW e jb, iv¯ v bv _vK j Kvb Avqg~jK KvRB mwVKfv e n e bv| f¨vb, wi·v, UªvK BZ¨vw` fvjfv e Pjvi Rb¨ Aek¨B iv¯ v Dc-cÖKí Ab¨vb¨ mve-

131

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

cÖ R ±i g a¨ AMÖvwaKvi cv e| m¨vc (g¨v bRvi), Rvgvjcyi, e jb- KwgDwbwU Dc-cÖKí wbY©vqK hgb- cÖKí e¨ve¯ vcYvi Dchy³ mvg_©¨ _vK Z n e Ges ¯ vwq Z¡i welqwU we ePbvq _vK Z n e|

Av Mi eQ ii MÖvg¸ jv Z CSO-i KwgDwbwU Dc-cÖK íi wel q mvnv h¨i cÖ qvRb n j PO, Rvgvjcyi, mn hvwMZv Ki e e j POÕi wUg wjWvi Avk¦vm `b| wcGgG _ K ejv nq h, XvKv AvnQ&vwbqv wgkb MZ mfvq Kuv_v mjvB cÖK íi K_v e j Qb| GUv GKUv fv jv Dc-cÖKí n Z cv i| ZvQvovI wewfb gRv cyKzi SAP Gi AvIZvq Avm Z cv i|

wm×v t MÖvgevmx ì mv _ Av jvPbv K i MÖv gi Resource Gi Dci wfwË K i KwgDwbwU Dc-cÖK íi welq wba©viY Ki Z n e| cyivZb MÖv gI KwgDwbwU Dc-cÖK í Avw_©K mnvqZv cÖ`vb Kiv h Z cv i| CSO Ges PO h _fv e Gme AwZwi³ Dc-cÖKí¸ jv ev¯ evq bi Rb¨ wPwýZ Ki j fv jv nq| `vwqZ¡t CSO Ges PO 5. welqt Uªwbs hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF, CSO Ges PAST Av jvPbv: wewfb KwgwUi m`m¨ ì GKvD Um& g¨v bR g Ui Dci cÖwk¶Y ìKvi e j ESDO MvBevÜvi c¶ _ K D jL Kiv nq| GgwW `ª Z Uªwbs Ìqvi c ¶ gZvgZ `b| SDF cÖ_ g CF Ges PAST Gi gvV ch©v qi Kgx© ì TOT w` e| Zvici, Uªwbs cÖvßiv wewfb KwgwUi m`m¨ ì Uªwbs w` e| DDC Zv ì GKvD U ¯ úkvwjó ev` w` q ïaygvÎ GKRb GKvDb U U wb j Kv Ri Rb¨ myweav n e e j SDF _ K ejv nq|

wm×v : SDF, TOT w` e| `vwqZ¡: SDF GKRb GKvD U U wb q KvR Ki e e j DDC GKgZ nq| `vwqZ¡: DDC 6. welqt Ab¨vb¨ hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF, PO, CSO, PAST, PMA, HPO, Ges TAT Av jvPbv: GgwW D jL K ib, CNRS wek¦ e¨vs K Rvbvq h, gv K©U mW cÖvB fU Rwg Z n q Q, wK RwgwU cÖK Zc ¶ Lvm| CNRS cÖwZwbwa D jL K ib h, G ai bi Z_¨ PMA Õi c¶ _ K Ìqv nqwb, GwU m¤¢eZ: Zv ì wb R ì gvV cwi`k©b _ K c q _vK Z cv i| m¨vc (g¨v bRvi), MvBevÜv, PMAÕi K_vq m¤§wZ ÁvcY K ib| Natural Disaster G mvnvh¨ Kivi wKQyUv A_© eiv× wek¦ e¨vsK i L Q| ZvB Kv K, wKfv e, KLb w` Z n e Zv hb cvU©bviiv gZvgZ `q| ms¯ viv wb RivB GmwWGd evZ©vq wb R ì Kv Ri mvd jï welq¸ jv wjwLZ AvKv i cvVv Z cv i| Impact Evaluation Agency 22 Rvbyqvix 2005 Gi gvV ch©v qi KvR ïi Ki Z cv i| mvd jï w`K¸ jv Zz j ai j Zv cÖK íi Rb¨ fvj nq| cÖwZ gv m SDF, PMA Gi mv _ NFR wb q em e|

132

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

wm×v : ÎgvwmK wi cvU© 22/01/05 Gi c~ e© cvVv Z n e| wi cvU© h_vm¤¢e Qualitative n Z n e| gvwmK wi cv U© mvgvwRK I cwi ek welq¸ jv Aek¨B _vK Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PAST cÖK íi fvj w`K¸ jv Zz j ai Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PMA 7. welqt mxW gvwb hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF, PO, CSO Ges PAST Av jvPbv: GgwW Rvbvb mxW gvwb mivmwi MÖRy¨ qU Uªwb ì MÖ cwfwËKfv e Ìqv n e e j wek¦ e¨vsK Rvwb q w` q Q| mxW gvwb wKfv e Distribute Kiv n e Zvi Dci CSO, PO I PAST KvQ _ K wjwLZ gZvgZ Pvb| KviY Gme gZvg Zi Dci wfwË K i WBGi mv _ Av jvPbv Ki Z n e| MÖ c g¨v bR g Ui Rb¨ GKwU MvBW jvBb cÖYqb Kiv ìKvi e j PO Rvgvjcyi g b K i| G Z wfwWwm KI RwoZ Ki Z n e, SDF Zv Z m¤§wZ ÁvcY K i| mxW gvwb 80% Uªwb Z mxgve× bq, Dchy³ g b n j 90% Uªwb K Zv cÖ`vb Kiv h Z cv i e j wek¦ e¨vsK Rvwb q Q| h me Uªwb mxW gvwb cv e bv Zv ì Ges Ab¨vb¨ nZ`wi`ª ì Ab¨ Kvb ms¯ vi mv _ hvMv hvM K i Ìqv n e| G e¨vcv i PKSF I ASAGi mv _ K_v n Q|

wm×v : cvU©bviiv mxW gvwb Ìqvi wel q wjwLZ gZvgZ w` e| `vwqZ¡: CSO, PO I PAST MÖ c g¨v bR g Ui Rb¨ GKwU MvBW jvBb Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: PO 8. welqt Dropout hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF Ges PO Av jvPbv: G wel q POÕi c¶ _ K ejv nq h- AwffveK I ev Pv ì mv _ advocacy mkb Kiv n Q| Dce wËi UvKv hLv b Av Q mLv b ev Pviv fwZ© n Z Pvq| ev Pv ì eqm 12-i Dc i nIqv Z Zv ì ¯ z j fwZ© Kiv hv Q bv| wkï kªg 14 eQi aiv n q Q, ZvB Zv ì ekx eq m fwZ© m¤¢e bq| Zv ì wb q `¶Zv Db qb e w×i Dci mve-cÖ R± n Z cv i| hv ì fwZ© Kiv m¤¢e n e bv Zv ì Rb¨ e w³g~jK wk¶vi eë¯ v Kiv h Z cv i e j SDF gZvgZ `q| `¶Zv Db qb e w× mve-cÖ R± wel q SDF m¤§wZ cÖKvk K i|

wm×v t ekx eq mi ev Pv `i wel q wk¶v wefv Mi m ½ Av jvPbv Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: SDF 9. welqt Baseline Survey, ¯ ^v¯ ¨

133

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report

hvi Rb¨ cÖ hvR¨: SDF HPO, Ges TAT Av jvPbv: HPO I TAT MvBevÜv Rvbvb h, hwÌ wfwWwm cÖ_ g Avk¦vm w` qwQj wK eZ©gv b Zv ì KvQ _ K Kvb mvnvh¨ cv Q bv| wewbg q Zviv A_© Pv Q| 9wU MÖv g mv f© Ki Z gvU 40w`b jvM e| HPO Rvgvjcyi cÖwZwbwa Rvbvb, KvR Ki Z Zv ì G ai bi Kvb mgm¨vq co Z nqwb| Rvgvjcy i 10 Rb QvÎ K cÖwk¶Y w` q Zv ì w` q Rixc Pvjv Q| Rvgvjcy i 3 w` b 80% KvR n q Q| wZbwU MÖv g GKmv _ KvR ïi Kiv n q Q QvÎ ì w` q| ¯ vbxq ¯ ^v¯ ¨Kg©x K Kv R jvMv bv n q Q|

wm×v : HPO MvBevÜv K Rvgvjcy ii c v Aej¤^b Ki Z n e| `vwqZ¡: HPO Ges TAT KvR h_vmg q kl Kivi Rb¨ AwZwi³ Rbej `iKvi n j Zv SDF K Rvbv Z n e|

cieZx© djvdj: ¯ ^v¯ ¨ welqK Iwi q Ukb w` q Rwic Kvh©µg ïi n q Q| 10. welqt Av jvPbvi ms ¶c hvi R b¨ cÖ hvR¨t SDF, PO, CSO, PAST, PMA, HPO, Ges TAT Av jvPbvt mfvi mfvcwZ, mfvq Av jvwPZ welq mg~n msw¶ß AvKv i Zz j a ib| wZwb cÖKí ev¯ evq b mgm¨v, Uªwbs, cÖwZwU Kv Ri P~ov mgqmxgv, c~e©-KzUvgwb MÖv gi 2q wKw¯ i UvKv Qvo, Rwic, wjM¨vj wK¬wbK, ivBUm& GÛ j I bvixi ¶gZvqb BZ¨vw` wel qi Dci Av jvPbvi mvi- ms ¶c Zz j a ib|

134

SIPP Process Monitoring 2nd Quarterly Report mfvi Av jvP¨ m~Px

SDF : GgwW, wRGg ( cÖvMÖvg), wRGg (dvBb¨vÝ), civgk©K I g¨v bRvi| CSO : cÖ R± Kv-AwW© bUi, Rvgvjcyi I cÖ R± Kv-AwW© bUi, MvBevÜv| PO : cÖ R± KvAwW© bUi, Rvgvjcyi I cÖ R± Kv-AwW© bUi, MvBevÜv| PAST : wUg wjWvi Rvgvjcyi I wUg wjWvi, MvBevÜv| PMA : jvK¨vj Kv-AwW© bUi I wmwbqi wimvm© Awdmvi| HPO : g¨v bRvi| TAT : Kb&mvjU¨v U|

(Gg nvwdRDwÏb Lvb) g¨v bwRs WvB i±i mvk¨vj W fjc g U dvD Ûkb

135 This document was created with Win2PDF available at http://www.daneprairie.com. The unregistered version of Win2PDF is for evaluation or non-commercial use only.