The World Bank

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The World Bank Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR00001416 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (TF-23724) ON A Public Disclosure Authorized GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 6.0 MILLION (US$ 7.92 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA FOR A MALOTI-DRAKENSBERG TRANSFRONTIER CONSERVATION AND Public Disclosure Authorized DEVELOPMENT PROJECT June 29, 2010 Environment and Natural Resource Management Unit - AFTEN Public Disclosure Authorized Southern Africa 1, South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland - AFCS1 Africa Region CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective Oct. 24, 2009) Currency Unit = ZAR ZAR 1.00 = US$0.139 US$1.00 = Rand 7.563 FISCAL YEAR April 1 – March 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BP Business Plans BSC Bilateral Steering Committee CAS Country Assistance Strategy CCF Community Conservation Forum CDP Concept Development Plans COP Conference of Parties CPS Country Partnership Strategy DEA Department of Environmental Affairs DEAT Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism DWAF Department of Water Affairs and Forestry EC- Eastern Cape Department of Economic Development and Environmental DEDEA Affairs ECP Eastern Cape Parks EKZNW Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife FMC Financial Management Committees FS- Free State Department of Tourism, Environment and Economic Affairs DTEEA GEF Global Environment Facility GEO Global Environment Objective GIS Global Information System ICR Implementation Completion and Results Report IMP Integrated Management Plans JBCC Joint Bilateral Commission on Cooperation KZN KwaZulu-Natal KZN- KZN Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Development DAERD MDTP Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier Conservation and Development Project METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool MoU Memorandum of Understanding MTEC Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Culture (of Lesotho) NR Nature Reserve NRM Natural Resource Management PA Protected Area PAD Project Appraisal Document PCC Project Coordination Committee PCU Project Coordination Unit PDO Project Development Objective PES Payment for Eco-services PIP Project Implementation Plan RSA Republic of South Africa SADC Southern Africa Development Community SANParks South African National Parks SAHRA South African Heritage Resources Agency SLM Sustainable Land Management TFCA Transfrontier Conservation Agreements TFP Transfrontier Park WWF World Wide Fund for Nature Vice President: Obiageli Ezekwesili Country Director: Ruth Kagia Sector Manager: Idah Pswarayi-Riddihough Project Team Leader: Frauke Jungbluth ICR Team Leader: Frauke Jungbluth REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Maloti-Drakensberg Transfrontier Conservation and Development Project CONTENTS Data Sheet A. Basic Information B. Key Dates C. Ratings Summary D. Sector and Theme Codes E. Bank Staff F. Results Framework Analysis G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs H. Restructuring I. Disbursement Graph 1. Project Context, Global Environment Objectives and Design ................................... 1 2. Key Factors Affecting Implementation and Outcomes .............................................. 4 3. Assessment of Outcomes ............................................................................................ 8 4. Assessment of Risk to Development Outcome ......................................................... 12 5. Assessment of Bank and Borrower Performance ..................................................... 13 6. Lessons Learned ....................................................................................................... 15 7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners .......... 16 Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing .......................................................................... 17 Annex 2. Outputs by Component ................................................................................. 18 Annex 3. Economic and Financial Analysis ................................................................. 31 Annex 4. Bank Lending and Implementation Support/Supervision Processes ............ 32 Annex 5. Beneficiary Survey Results ........................................................................... 34 Annex 6. Stakeholder Workshop Report and Results ................................................... 35 Annex 7. Summary of Borrower's ICR and/or Comments on Draft ICR ..................... 36 Annex 8. Comments of Cofinanciers and Other Partners/Stakeholders ....................... 38 Annex 9. Results of the Protected Area Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool ... 40 Annex 10. List of Supporting Documents .................................................................... 43 MAP ...............................................................................................................................44 A. Basic Information Maloti-Drakensberg Country: South Africa Project Name: Transfrontier Conservation and Development Project Project ID: P052368 L/C/TF Number(s): TF-23724 ICR Date: 06/29/2010 ICR Type: Core ICR REPUBLIC OF SOUTH Lending Instrument: SIL Borrower: AFRICA Original Total USD 7.9M Disbursed Amount: USD 7.7M Commitment: Revised Amount: USD 7.7M Environmental Category: B Global Focal Area: B Implementing Agencies: EKZN Wildlife Services Cofinanciers and Other External Partners: B. Key Dates Revised / Actual Process Date Process Original Date Date(s) Concept Review: 04/28/1999 Effectiveness: 11/26/2002 11/27/2002 Appraisal: 01/10/2000 Restructuring(s): Approval: 09/13/2001 Mid-term Review: 08/27/2005 08/01/2005 Closing: 12/31/2007 12/31/2009 C. Ratings Summary C.1 Performance Rating by ICR Outcomes: Moderately Satisfactory Risk to Global Environment Outcome Moderate Bank Performance: Moderately Unsatisfactory Borrower Performance: Satisfactory C.2 Detailed Ratings of Bank and Borrower Performance Bank Ratings Borrower Ratings Quality at Entry: Moderately Unsatisfactory Government: Satisfactory Implementing Quality of Supervision: Moderately Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Agency/Agencies: Overall Bank Overall Borrower Moderately Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Performance: Performance: - i - C.3 Quality at Entry and Implementation Performance Indicators Implementation QAG Assessments (if Indicators Rating Performance any) Potential Problem Project at No Quality at Entry (QEA): Moderately Unsatisfactory any time (Yes/No): Problem Project at any time Quality of Supervision No None (Yes/No): (QSA): GEO rating before Satisfactory Closing/Inactive status D. Sector and Theme Codes Original Actual Sector Code (as % of total Bank financing) Forestry 40 10 General agriculture, fishing and forestry sector 10 40 General public administration sector 20 20 Other industry 10 20 Other social services 20 10 Theme Code (as % of total Bank financing) Biodiversity 20 20 Export development and competitiveness 20 Land administration and management 20 30 Other environment and natural resources management 30 Participation and civic engagement 20 10 Rural non-farm income generation 20 10 E. Bank Staff Positions At ICR At Approval Vice President: Obiageli Katryn Ezekwesili Callisto E. Madavo Country Director: Ruth Kagia Fayez S. Omar Sector Manager: Idah Z. Pswarayi-Riddihough Agnes I. Kiss Project Team Leader: Frauke Jungbluth Jan P. Bojo ICR Team Leader: Frauke Jungbluth ICR Primary Author: Josef Ernstberger - ii - F. Results Framework Analysis Global Environment Objectives (GEO) and Key Indicators(as approved) 1. To conserve this globally significant biodiversity of the Maloti-Drakensberg Mountains 2. To contribute to community development through income generation from nature-based tourism. Revised Global Environment Objectives (as approved by original approving authority) and Key Indicators and reasons/justifications (a) GEO Indicator(s) Original Target Actual Value Formally Values (from Achieved at Indicator Baseline Value Revised Target approval Completion or Values documents) Target Years Lesotho and South Africa develop and approve transfrontier conservation and Indicator 1 : development framework The 20 year transfrontier strategy Transfrontier has been approved conservation and and a bilateral MoU Value development signed committing (Quantitative or No Framework in place framework approved both countries to the Qualitative) by the two countries implementation of the and under strategy. implementation. Implementation of the first 5 year action plan ongoing. Date achieved 09/13/2002 12/30/2008 11/15/2009 Comments (incl. % 100% achieved - transfrontier mechanisms in place achievement) Indicator 2 : Stakeholders work together to realize nature based tourism opportunities The overall tourism strategy is completed Transfrontier eco- Value and a publication has No joint strategy exist tourism strategy (Quantitative or been produced between the two countries designed and Qualitative) showcasing the implemented. Maloti-Drakensberg region. Date achieved 09/13/2002 12/30/2008 03/11/2009 Comments Target has been achieved. However, tourism in South Africa was already quite developed (incl. % with marginal scope for further development - the project therefore engaged in a PES achievement) system which is not yet achieved to make fully operational. - iii - (b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s) Original Target Actual Value Formally Values (from Achieved at Indicator Baseline Value Revised Target approval Completion or Values documents) Target Years Transfrontier conservation area identified and implemented with Lesotho Indicator 1 : (UKhahlamba and Sehlabathebe Parks) The joint Maloti- Formal institutional Drakensberg
Recommended publications
  • Herpetofaunal Survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the Foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 717-730 (2020) (published online on 25 August 2020) Herpetofaunal survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa Werner Conradie1,2,* Brian Reeves3, Sandile Mdoko3, Lwandiso Pamla3, and Oyama Gxabhu3 Abstract. The results of a herpetofaunal survey of Ongeluksnek Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa are presented here. Combination of visual encounter survey methods and standard Y-shape trap arrays were used to conduct the survey. A total of 26 species (eight amphibians and 18 reptiles) were recorded, representing 29 quarter-degree grid cell records, of which 62% represented the first records for these units. Furthermore, we document the presence of three species of snakes (Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia, Hemachatus haemachatus and Homoroselaps lacteus) for the first time for the whole degree square of 3028 (approx. 100 km2). This study highlights the need to survey poorly known regions to enable us to understand and document the full distributional extent of species. We also discuss the impact of uncontrolled fires on the absence of grassland specialised species during our survey. Keywords. Amphibia, Reptilia, karroid, conservation, biodiversity, fire Introduction has been done in the southern and western regions (e.g. Branch and Braack, 1987), while the northern and The herpetofaunal richness of South Africa is central areas associated with the former homelands of considered to be amongst the highest in the world the Ciskei and Transkei remained poorly surveyed. In (Branch, 1998; Bates et al., 2014; Du Preez and recent years a series of rapid biodiversity studies has Carruthers, 2017; Tolley et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Lesotho the Commonwealth Yearbook 2014 the Commonwealth Yearbook the Most Significant Issue Is Overgrazing, Resulting Maseru (Capital, Pop
    Lesotho Lesotho KEY FACTS Africa is Thabana–Ntlenyana (3,842 metres) in eastern Lesotho. The land descends to the west to an arable belt, known as the Joined Commonwealth: 1966 lowlands, where the capital is situated and two-thirds of the Population: 2,052,000 (2012) population live. The country is well-watered in a generally dry GDP p.c. growth: 2.8% p.a. 1990–2012 region, the Orange river and its tributary the Caledon both rising in UN HDI 2012: world ranking 158 Lesotho. Official languages: Sesotho, English Climate: The climate is temperate with well-marked seasons. The Time: GMT plus 2hr rainy season (receiving 85 per cent of total precipitation) is October Currency: loti, plural maloti (M) to April, when there are frequent violent thunderstorms. Rainfall averages 746 mm p.a. Temperatures in the lowlands range from Geography 32.2°C to –6.7°C; the range is much greater in the mountains. From May to September, snow falls in the highlands with heavy Area: 30,355 sq km frosts occurring in the lowlands. Coastline: none Capital: Maseru Environment: The most significant issue is overgrazing, resulting The Kingdom of Lesotho is a small landlocked country entirely in severe soil erosion and desertification. surrounded by South Africa. It is known as the ‘Mountain Vegetation: Mainly grassland and bushveld, with forest in ravines Kingdom’, the whole country being over 1,000 metres in altitude. and on the windward slopes of mountains. Forest covers one per The country is divided into ten districts, each named after the cent of the land area and arable land comprises ten per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigaeic Invertebrate Community Structure in Two Subtropical Nature Reserves, Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implications for Conservation Management
    © Arachnologische Gesellschaft e.V. Frankfurt/Main; http://arages.de/ Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 52: 7-15 Karlsruhe, September 2016 Epigaeic invertebrate community structure in two subtropical nature reserves, Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implications for conservation management Augustine S. Niba & Inam Yekwayo doi: 10.5431/aramit5203 Abstract. Epigaeic invertebrates were sampled at non-invaded (‘Indigenous Forest’ and ‘Indigenous Grassland’) and alien-invaded (‘Eu- calyptus’ and ‘Mixed alien’) sub-sites in the Nduli and Luchaba Nature Reserves using pitfall traps. A total of 2054 specimens belonging to three phyla (Arthropoda, Mollusca and Annelida) was caught and sorted into seven orders, 18 families, one tribe, 45 genera (22 identified to species level) and 20 morphospecies. Higher species richness occurred in ‘Indigenous Forest’ and ‘Mixed Alien’ sub-sites while higher specimen counts were made in invaded (‘Mixed Alien’ and ‘Eucalyptus’) sub-sites during summer months, peaking in January. Canonical Correspondence Analysis results show that some measured site variables, e.g. litter depth, grazing intensity, percentage of alien vege- tation cover, and soil chemical properties accounted for invertebrate taxa composition and distribution trends at sub-sites. Although habitat-patch level characteristics (including abiotic factors) were important for determining species distributions, increased levels of infestation by invasive alien vegetation across sub-sites did not necessarily impact on epigaeic invertebrates
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Annual
    EASTERN CAPE PARKS AND TOURISM ANNUAL REPORT 2018/19 REPORT ANNUAL AND TOURISM EASTERN CAPE PARKS 17-25 Oxford Street | East London | 5213 East London | PO Box 11235 | Southernwood | East London | 5213 Eastern Cape | South Africa +27 (0) 43 492 0881 [email protected] www.visiteasterncape.co.za RP290/2019 ISBN: 978-0-621-47767-2 ANNUAL REPORT Long-beaked common dolphin COVER Photo credit: Mark M Gottlieb – www.MarksAdventures.com Hole in the Wall Photo credit: Marius Labuschagne Pounding waves have helped shape South Africa’s coastline for 160 million years - since continental rifting tore Africa from the ancestral landmass Gondwana, leaving her edges exposed to a unique blend of currents and seas. National Geographic Gondwana was an ancient supercontinent that broke up about 180 million years ago. The continent eventually split into landmasses we recognize today: Africa, South America, Australia, Antarctica, the Indian subcontinent and the Arabian Peninsula. CONTENTS PG 5 GENERAL INFORMATION 1 PUBLIC.................................................................................................. ENTITY’S GENERAL INFORMATION 7 2 BO..................................................................................................ARD MEMBERS 8 3 LI...............................................................................................ST OF ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS 10 1 AUDITOR’S REPORT: PREDETERMINED OBJECTIVES 4 FO................................................................................................REWORD BY THE CHAIRPERSON
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art and the Contested Landscape of the North Eastern Cape, South Africa
    ROCK ART AND THE CONTESTED LANDSCAPE OF THE NORTH EASTERN CAPE, SOUTH AFRICA Leila Henry A dissertation for the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Johannesburg, June 2010. DECLARATION I declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work. It is being submitted for the degree of Master of Arts in the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for any degree or examination in any other University. _____________________ (Leila Marguerita Henry) ________ day of_______________, 2010 i ABSTRACT The north Eastern Cape is well known for its exceptional fine-line rock art. Recently, two non-fine-line traditions have been identified in the high mountains of this region. These corpora of rock art formed part of the interaction between San and non-San individuals in the creolised context of the nineteenth century. My discovery of further non-fine-line rock art, on the inland plateau, offers an opportunity to better understand the development of non-fine-line rock art and the role it played in relations between different groups. I argue that these three corpora of non-fine-line rock art are chronological variants of a single tradition, which I label the Type 2 tradition. The development of this tradition is associated with the breakdown of independent San-led bands and their loss of control of the space of painting, which became a contested landscape as multi-ethnic groups vied for political influence in the region and access to the San spirit world that would aid in their raiding prowess.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Habitat Structure and Troop Size in Eastern Cape
    Distribution, habitat structure and troop size in Eastern Cape samango monkeys Cercopithecus albogularis labiatus (Primates: Cercopithecoidea) A dissertation submitted to the Department of Zoology and Entomology in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Zoology the University of Fort Hare by Vusumzi Martins Supervisors: Dr Fabien Génin and Prof. Judith Masters GENERAL ABSTRACT The samango monkey subspecies Cercopithecus albogularis labiatus is endemic to South Africa, and known to occur in Afromontane forests. There has been a major decline in this subspecies, exceeding 30% in some populations over the past 30 years, primarily as a result of the loss of suitable habitat. A second samango subspecies, C. a. erythrarchus, occurs near the northern border of South Africa, mainly in coastal lowland forest, and the distributions of the two subspecies do not overlap. C. a. labiatus was thought to be confined to Afromontane forests, but the study described here focused on C. a. labiatus populations that were recently identified in the Indian Ocean Belt forests near East London. I undertook to assess the distribution of C. a. labiatus in the Eastern Cape, to evaluate the habitat structures of the Afromontane and Indian Ocean coastal belt forests, and to understand the effect these habitats have on essential aspects of the socio-ecology of the C. a. labiatus populations. Distribution surveys were conducted in protected areas throughout the Eastern Cape, and samango monkeys were found to be present within forest patches in the Amatola Mountains, Eastern Cape dune forests and the Transkei coastal scarp forests. The sizes and composition of two troops were assessed: one troop in the Amatole forests and one in the Eastern Cape dune forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Regimes in Eastern Coastal Fynbos
    Fire regimes in eastern coastal fynbos: drivers, ecology and management by Tineke Kraaij Submitted in fulfilment/partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Philosophy in the Faculty of Science at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University August 2012 Promotor: Prof. R.M. Cowling Co-promotor: Dr B.W. van Wilgen Declaration I, Tineke Kraaij, student number 211211583, hereby declare that the thesis for Doctorate of Philosophy is my own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment or completion of any postgraduate qualification to another University or for another qualification. I am now presenting the thesis for examination for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy. Tineke Kraaij Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................... 7 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. 9 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 11 References ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Parrot Big Birding Day Report
    17th Annual Parrot Count- Report on the 2014 Cape Parrot Big Birding Day. Colleen T. Downs* School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P/Bag X01, Scottsville, 3209, South Africa. Email: [email protected] *Cape Parrot Working Group Chairperson. Background The Cape Parrot (Poicephalus robustus) is the only parrot species endemic to South Africa and is currently one of South Africa’s Endangered birds. Skead (1971) highlighted that the numbers of Cape Parrots had declined since the early 1900s, particularly in the 1950’s. In 1989 Boshoff estimated less than a 1000 in the wild. So this raised questions: were these declines real and how many Cape parrots were there in the wild? Standard bird counting techniques are unsuitable for Cape Parrots as they are nomadic feeders with unpredictable movements. Parrots’ cryptic colouration combined with dense forest habitats often make them difficult to locate once perched but their loud harsh calls whilst in-flight make their presence known. They are most active during the first few hours after dawn and before sunset, (although during misty conditions these periods can be extended), when they leave and return to their roosts in forest patches. These characteristics allow for a ‘total count’ of the parrots. Consequently the Cape Parrot Big Birding Day (CPBBD) was initiated in 1998, and has been held annually since as part of the conservation effort of the Cape Parrot Working Group. The aim is to determine their occurrence and obtain an accurate population estimate of the Cape Parrot. Over the recent years less than 1600 have been counted in the wild (Downs et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Nineteenth-Century Maloti- Drakensberg Mountains1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery The ‘Interior World’ of the Nineteenth-Century Maloti- Drakensberg Mountains1 Rachel King*1, 2, 3 and Sam Challis3 1 Centre of African Studies, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom 2 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom 3 Rock Art Research Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Over the last four decades archaeological and historical research has the Maloti-Drakensberg Mountains as a refuge for Bushmen as the nineteenth-century colonial frontier constricted their lifeways and movements. Recent research has expanded on this characterisation of mountains-as-refugia, focusing on ethnically heterogeneous raiding bands (including San) forging new cultural identities in this marginal context. Here, we propose another view of the Maloti-Drakensberg: a dynamic political theatre in which polities that engaged in illicit activities like raiding set the terms of colonial encounters. We employ the concept of landscape friction to re-cast the environmentally marginal Maloti-Drakensberg as a region that fostered the growth of heterodox cultural, subsistence, and political behaviours. We introduce historical, rock art, and ‘dirt’ archaeological evidence and synthesise earlier research to illustrate the significance of the Maloti-Drakensberg during the colonial period. We offer a revised southeast-African colonial landscape and directions for future research. Keywords Maloti-Drakensberg, Basutoland, AmaTola, BaPhuthi, creolisation, interior world 1 We thank Lara Mallen, Mark McGranaghan, Peter Mitchell, and John Wright for comments on this paper. This research was supported by grants from the South African National Research Foundation’s African Origins Platform, a Clarendon Scholarship from the University of Oxford, the Claude Leon Foundation, and the Smuts Memorial Fund at Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan Technical Report
    EASTERN CAPE BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PLAN TECHNICAL REPORT Derek Berliner & Philip Desmet “Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Land Use Decision- Making in the Eastern Cape Province” DWAF Project No 2005-012 1 August 2007 Revision 1 (5 September 2005) Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan Technical Report I Photo by Barry Clark Report Title; Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan Technical Report. Date: 1 August 2007 Authors: Derek Berliner & Dr Phillip Desmet Contact details; Derek Berliner, Eco-logic Consulting, email: [email protected]. cell: 083 236 7155 Dr Phillip Desmet, email: [email protected], cell: 082 352 2955 Client: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Principle funding agent: Development Bank of South Africa Citation: Berliner D. & Desmet P. (2007) Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan: Technical Report. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Project No 2005-012, Pretoria. 1 August 2007 (Unless otherwise quoted, intellectual property rights for the conceptual content of this report reside with the above authors) Eastern Cape Biodiversity Conservation Plan Technical Report II Acknowledgements The assistance of a large number of people has been essential to the success of this project. In particular, the authors would like to thank the funders of this project, the DBSA and DWAF, Nkosi Quvile (DWAF), Phumla Mzazi (DEDEA), Mandy Driver (SANBI), Julie Clarke (DBSA), Graeme Harrison (formerly DWAF) and members of the Project Steering Committee and Eastern Cape Implementation Committee for Bioregional Programmes. Our thanks also go to Ally Ashwell, John Allwood, Dave Balfour, Noluthando Bam, Rick Bernard, Roger Bills, Anton Bok, Andre Boshoff, Bill Branch, Mandy Cadman, Jim Cambray, Barry Clark, Willem Coetzer, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maloti Drakensberg Experience See Travel Map Inside This Flap❯❯❯
    exploring the maloti drakensberg route the maloti drakensberg experience see travel map inside this flap❯❯❯ the maloti drakensberg experience the maloti drakensberg experience …the person who practices ecotourism has the opportunity of immersing him or herself in nature in a way that most people cannot enjoy in their routine, urban existences. This person “will eventually acquire a consciousness and knowledge of the natural environment, together with its cultural aspects, that will convert him or her into somebody keenly involved in conservation issues… héctor ceballos-lascuráin internationally renowned ecotourism expert” travel tips for the maloti drakensberg region Eastern Cape Tourism Board +27 (0)43 701 9600 www.ectb.co.za, [email protected] lesotho south africa Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife currency Maloti (M), divided into 100 lisente (cents), have currency The Rand (R) is divided into 100 cents. Most +27 (0)33 845 1999 an equivalent value to South African rand which are used traveller’s cheques are accepted at banks and at some shops www.kznwildlife.com; [email protected] interchangeably in Lesotho. Note that Maloti are not accepted and hotels. Major credit cards are accepted in most towns. Free State Tourism Authority in South Africa in place of rand. banks All towns will have at least one bank. Open Mon to Fri: +27 (0)51 411 4300 Traveller’s cheques and major credit cards are generally 09h00–15h30, Sat: 09h00–11h00. Autobanks (or ATMs) are www.dteea.fs.gov.za accepted in Maseru. All foreign currency exchange should be found in most towns and operate on a 24-hour basis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of Reintroducing African Wild Dogs (Lycaon Pictus) Into the Great Fish River Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape, South Africa
    The feasibility of reintroducing African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) into the Great Fish River Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape, South Africa. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of RHODES UNIVERSITY By SAMANTHA KARIN PAGE February 2014 Abstract With a declining population of roughly 3000-5000 individuals in Africa, African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) are one of the most endangered carnivores in the world. As the global human population expands, it is becoming increasingly unlikely that large portions of land will be set aside for conservation, especially in developing countries. Thus, recent wild dog conservation efforts in South Africa have concentrated on establishing a managed metapopulation. A metapopulation is a group of geographically isolated subpopulations of a species that are managed (using supplementation and harvesting) to mimic natural gene flow. The Great Fish River Nature Reserve (GFRNR) in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa has been identified as a potential reserve to become part of the national wild dog metapopulation. My research aimed to conduct a feasibility assessment of the long-term (~ 25 years) success of a wild dog reintroduction into the GFRNR. This assessment included biological modelling of wild dogs and their expected prey, and determining the potential anthropogenic threats to wild dogs on the private and communal land surrounding the reserve. I used VORTEX population modelling and determined that the GFRNR is likely to have a wild dog carrying capacity of ~22 individuals. Using a 25-year modelling simulation, the most appropriate wild dog reintroduction scenario would be to reintroduce six females and four males initially and supplement the population with one female and two males in years 3, 10, 15 and 23.
    [Show full text]