DOCSLIB.ORG

The Feasibility of Reintroducing African Wild Dogs (Lycaon Pictus) Into the Great Fish River Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Feasibility of Reintroducing African Wild Dogs (Lycaon Pictus) Into the Great Fish River Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape, South Africa The feasibility of reintroducing African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) into the Great Fish River Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape, South Africa. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of RHODES UNIVERSITY By SAMANTHA KARIN PAGE February 2014 Abstract With a declining population of roughly 3000-5000 individuals in Africa, African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) are one of the most endangered carnivores in the world. As the global human population expands, it is becoming increasingly unlikely that large portions of land will be set aside for conservation, especially in developing countries. Thus, recent wild dog conservation efforts in South Africa have concentrated on establishing a managed metapopulation. A metapopulation is a group of geographically isolated subpopulations of a species that are managed (using supplementation and harvesting) to mimic natural gene flow. The Great Fish River Nature Reserve (GFRNR) in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa has been identified as a potential reserve to become part of the national wild dog metapopulation. My research aimed to conduct a feasibility assessment of the long-term (~ 25 years) success of a wild dog reintroduction into the GFRNR. This assessment included biological modelling of wild dogs and their expected prey, and determining the potential anthropogenic threats to wild dogs on the private and communal land surrounding the reserve. I used VORTEX population modelling and determined that the GFRNR is likely to have a wild dog carrying capacity of ~22 individuals. Using a 25-year modelling simulation, the most appropriate wild dog reintroduction scenario would be to reintroduce six females and four males initially and supplement the population with one female and two males in years 3, 10, 15 and 23. In addition, the harvesting/removal of one male and one female in years 10 and 20 would be required to ensure 100% population persistence and adequate genetic diversity. Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) and bushbuck (Tragelaphus scriptus) are expected to be the two most important prey species for reintroduced wild dogs in the GFRNR. Furthermore, wild dogs are likely to prefer the north-western and south-western sectors of the reserve because of the relatively high prey densities in these areas. However, regular monitoring of both the potential prey and the wild dog populations is essential to ensure persistence of the wild dogs and to prevent prey populations decreasing precipitously. Using structured questionnaire interviews (n = 128), I found that while neighbouring land owners and local communities were generally positive about the potential wild dog reintroduction (56 % of all respondents), several threats to wild dogs were identified along the reserve boundary and on the adjoining unprotected land. Some private landowners and members of rural communities around the reserve (34 %) stated that they would kill any wild dogs that dispersed onto their land. In addition, some respondents (8 %) admitted to believing i in traditional uses for wild dog products (e.g. fur) which could result in the illegal killing of wild dogs outside of the GFRNR for traditional purposes. Poaching and the presence of unvaccinated domestic dogs on neighbouring land were also identified as being potential threats to a reintroduced wild dog population. However, such anthropogenic threats appear to be localised to the western and southern boundaries of the reserve. Therefore, by implementing preventative measures (such as anti-snare collars, anti-poaching patrols and vaccination against rabies and canine distemper) the likelihood of such threats occurring can be reduced. I conclude that the GFRNR can sustain a population of wild dogs and successfully contribute to South Africa‘s national metapopulation. An additional reserve will benefit the country‘s metapopulation by increasing the number of wild dogs available for translocation, thereby increasing genetic diversity and overall resilience (to environmental change, disease etc.) of South Africa‘s wild dog population. This will contribute towards the future conservation of this endangered species. ii Table of Contents Abstract.......................................................................................................................................i Table of contents.......................................................................................................................iii Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................v CHAPTER 1: Introduction…………………………………………………….……………1 1.1. Physical description 1 1.2. Taxonomy 2 1.3. Dispersal behaviour 3 1.4. Social behaviour 3 1.5. Reproduction. 4 1.6. Conservation status 6 1.7. Wild dog history in Africa and causes for their decline 6 1.8. The managed metapopulation conservation strategy 11 1.9. Wild dogs in the Eastern Cape Province 13 1.10. Motivation for the study 14 CHAPTER 2: Study Site……………………………………………………………………15 2.1. Location 15 2.2. Surrounding land use 15 2.3. Site description and history 16 2.4. Topography and geography 19 2.5. General climate 20 2.6. Vegetation units 22 2.7. Predator and prey populations 26 2.8. Management of the GFRNR 27 CHAPTER 3: The biological pre-requisites for an African wild dog reintroduction into the Great Fish River Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape, South Africa……………………..28 3.1. Introduction 28 3.2. Methods 34 iii 3.3. Results 44 3.4. Discussion 55 CHAPTER 4: The socio-demographic environment surrounding the Great Fish River Nature Reserve and how this relates to a potential African wild dog reintroduction……………………………………………………………………………….62 4.1. Introduction 62 4.2. Methods 69 4.3. Results 77 4.4. Discussion 98 CHAPTER 5: Synthesis……………………………………...……………………………109 CHAPTER 6: References……………………………………………………………..…..114 APPENDICES………..……………………………………………………………………129 Appendix A (VORTEX simulations) 129 Appendix B (Questionnaire) 131 Appendix C (The questions and scoring system used to determine the threat index) 140 iv Acknowledgements The contributions of the following organisations and individuals to this research are gratefully acknowledged: o To my supervisors, Dr Dan Parker and Dr Harriet Davies-Mostert, I am truly grateful for all your advice and guidance through this project. To Dan who reviewed each chapter countless times and to Harriet for helping me understand VORTEX and biological modelling. o To Dr Dean Peinke, all your help from stage one of this project made this research possible. With luck you will get your wild dogs soon. o To everyone at Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency who helped with community surveys, especially Zimasa Gibisela, Nomatile Nombewu, Ntokozo Tembe, Zezetu Mnqetha, Nobendiba Shiyani and Melikhaya Pongolo. o Thanks to Gavin Shaw and Cathy Dreyer for all the help and fun you have provided this year. I hope in the next year you both have some wild dogs to run after (and I hope they won‘t provide you with too many grey hairs). o Thank you to Sirion Robertson for proof reading. [Pleasure! – S.R.] o Brendan Whittington-Jones for countless reviews of chapters and helping me sort through methodology. o The land owners who took the time to meet with me and complete these questionnaires, and the community members who were all so eager to learn more about these wonderful animals. o For financial support: The National Research Foundation (NRF) and Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Agency. v o Thank you to Megan Murison who always trekked into the field with me (regardless of the time). You really made field work an incredible amount of fun. And an extra thank you for always driving safely! o The Zoology Master‘s class of 2013... Some of us have been together since 2009; what a wonderful journey it has been. I wish you all the best for years to come. o To Bryan Nicholson, thank you for the past 5 years, for always encouraging me and for all your love and support. o To my amazing friends, Sam Waterworth, Sam Humby, Kyra Lunderstedt, Tam Perks and Amy Pretorius. All your support and love helped me do this in a year. o And the biggest thank you goes to my family, who never stopped encouraging me. I never could have done this without you all. vi CHAPTER 1: General Introduction 1.1. Physical description African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus), also known as the painted hunting dog, are medium-sized, slightly-built carnivores, averaging 67 -78 cm in shoulder height and weighing approximately 20-25 kg (Vucetich & Creel 1999; Creel & Creel 2002). Males are generally three to seven percent heavier than their female counterparts (Creel & Creel 2002). They have several features which make them distinguishable from other African carnivores (Figure 1.1). Firstly, wild dogs have large, round, black ears which gives them excellent hearing and assists in thermoregulation (Estes 1993). Secondly, their coat patterns are individually unique, allowing them to differentiate easily between members of their pack. Their coats are a combination of mottled black, white and tan (Estes 1993; Creel & Creel 2002). Thirdly, their faces are a black and brown, with a black line extending up the face and along the sagittal crest and there is no white on the head (Estes 1993). Finally, their tails are bushy and are predominantly white. This is suggested to assist with maintaining visual contact within the pack (Creel & Creel 2002). Figure 1.1: African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) have unique physical features which make them easy to distinguish from other African
Load more

Recommended publications
  • African Indaba
    Afriican Indaba eNewslletter Vollume. 5, Number 1 Page 1 AFRICAN INDABA Volume 5, Issue No 1 eNewsletter January 2007 Dedicated to the People and Wildlife of Africa to ensure that the conference did not turn into an emotional, pro- 1 Conservation, Wildlife & versus anti-hunting debate. Speakers, discussions, and ques- tions focused on the role of markets, property rights, and law for Markets the benefit of effective wildlife policy formation. Recommendations from the “Conservation, Wildlife & Mar- One of the first speakers was Richard Leakey, former Direc- kets” conference at the Strathmore Business School, Nai- tor of Kenya’s wildlife regulatory agency, Kenya Wildlife Service. robi, and its implications for Kenya’s wildlife policy review The content of Leakey’s presentation was a surprise to the audi- ence, given his past position statements. Leakey commented on Guest Editorial by Dr Stephanie S. Romañach the unsustainably and large scale of the illegal bushmeat trade. Wildlife conservation and wildlife policy are particularly emo- He stressed that hunting (in some form) has never stopped in tive topics in Kenya, often stimulating media coverage and in- Kenya despite the ban and is, in fact, widespread and out of tense debate. In 1977, Kenya imposed a ban on trophy hunting control. Leakey went on to say that decision makers should con- that is still in place today. sider a policy to regulate hunting, make hunting sustainable, and The Kenyan government has retained ownership of wildlife to allow people to derive value from wildlife. as well as user rights for the wildlife resource except for tourism. The ban on trophy hunting of almost three decades means Despite these policies, Kenya has remained a popular destina- that most Kenyans have never experienced regulated tourist tion among tourists, many choosing to visit the country for its trophy hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetofaunal Survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the Foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 717-730 (2020) (published online on 25 August 2020) Herpetofaunal survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa Werner Conradie1,2,* Brian Reeves3, Sandile Mdoko3, Lwandiso Pamla3, and Oyama Gxabhu3 Abstract. The results of a herpetofaunal survey of Ongeluksnek Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa are presented here. Combination of visual encounter survey methods and standard Y-shape trap arrays were used to conduct the survey. A total of 26 species (eight amphibians and 18 reptiles) were recorded, representing 29 quarter-degree grid cell records, of which 62% represented the first records for these units. Furthermore, we document the presence of three species of snakes (Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia, Hemachatus haemachatus and Homoroselaps lacteus) for the first time for the whole degree square of 3028 (approx. 100 km2). This study highlights the need to survey poorly known regions to enable us to understand and document the full distributional extent of species. We also discuss the impact of uncontrolled fires on the absence of grassland specialised species during our survey. Keywords. Amphibia, Reptilia, karroid, conservation, biodiversity, fire Introduction has been done in the southern and western regions (e.g. Branch and Braack, 1987), while the northern and The herpetofaunal richness of South Africa is central areas associated with the former homelands of considered to be amongst the highest in the world the Ciskei and Transkei remained poorly surveyed. In (Branch, 1998; Bates et al., 2014; Du Preez and recent years a series of rapid biodiversity studies has Carruthers, 2017; Tolley et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Damaliscus Pygargus Phillipsi – Blesbok
    Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi – Blesbok colour pattern (Fabricius et al. 1989). Hybridisation between these taxa threatens the genetic integrity of both subspecies (Skinner & Chimimba 2005). Assessment Rationale Listed as Least Concern, as Blesbok are abundant on both formally and privately protected land. We estimate a minimum mature population size of 54,426 individuals (using a 70% mature population structure) across 678 protected areas and wildlife ranches (counts between 2010 and 2016). There are at least an estimated 17,235 animals (counts between 2013 and 2016) on formally Emmanuel Do Linh San protected areas across the country, with the largest subpopulation occurring on Golden Gate Highlands National Park. The population has increased significantly Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern over three generations (1990–2015) in formally protected National Red List status (2004) Least Concern areas across its range and is similarly suspected to have increased on private lands. Apart from hybridisation with Reasons for change No change Bontebok, there are currently no major threats to its long- Global Red List status (2008) Least Concern term survival. Approximately 69% of Blesbok can be considered genetically pure (A. van Wyk & D. Dalton TOPS listing (NEMBA) None unpubl. data), and stricter translocation policies should be CITES listing None established to prevent the mixing of subspecies. Overall, this subspecies could become a keystone in the Endemic Yes sustainable wildlife economy. The common name, Blesbok, originates from ‘Bles’, the Afrikaans word for a ‘blaze’, which Distribution symbolises the white facial marking running down Historically, the Blesbok ranged across the Highveld from the animal’s horns to its nose, broken only grasslands of the Free State and Gauteng provinces, by the brown band above the eyes (Skinner & extending into northwestern KwaZulu-Natal, and through Chimimba 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • The Beaver's Phylogenetic Lineage Illuminated by Retroposon Reads
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The Beaver’s Phylogenetic Lineage Illuminated by Retroposon Reads Liliya Doronina1,*, Andreas Matzke1,*, Gennady Churakov1,2, Monika Stoll3, Andreas Huge3 & Jürgen Schmitz1 Received: 13 October 2016 Solving problematic phylogenetic relationships often requires high quality genome data. However, Accepted: 25 January 2017 for many organisms such data are still not available. Among rodents, the phylogenetic position of the Published: 03 March 2017 beaver has always attracted special interest. The arrangement of the beaver’s masseter (jaw-closer) muscle once suggested a strong affinity to some sciurid rodents (e.g., squirrels), placing them in the Sciuromorpha suborder. Modern molecular data, however, suggested a closer relationship of beaver to the representatives of the mouse-related clade, but significant data from virtually homoplasy- free markers (for example retroposon insertions) for the exact position of the beaver have not been available. We derived a gross genome assembly from deposited genomic Illumina paired-end reads and extracted thousands of potential phylogenetically informative retroposon markers using the new bioinformatics coordinate extractor fastCOEX, enabling us to evaluate different hypotheses for the phylogenetic position of the beaver. Comparative results provided significant support for a clear relationship between beavers (Castoridae) and kangaroo rat-related species (Geomyoidea) (p < 0.0015, six markers, no conflicting data) within a significantly supported mouse-related clade (including Myodonta, Anomaluromorpha, and Castorimorpha) (p < 0.0015, six markers, no conflicting data). Most of an organism’s phylogenetic history is fossilized in their heritable genomic material. Using data from genome sequencing projects, particularly informative regions of this material can be extracted in sufficient num- bers to resolve the deepest history of speciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Epigaeic Invertebrate Community Structure in Two Subtropical Nature Reserves, Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implications for Conservation Management
    © Arachnologische Gesellschaft e.V. Frankfurt/Main; http://arages.de/ Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 52: 7-15 Karlsruhe, September 2016 Epigaeic invertebrate community structure in two subtropical nature reserves, Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implications for conservation management Augustine S. Niba & Inam Yekwayo doi: 10.5431/aramit5203 Abstract. Epigaeic invertebrates were sampled at non-invaded (‘Indigenous Forest’ and ‘Indigenous Grassland’) and alien-invaded (‘Eu- calyptus’ and ‘Mixed alien’) sub-sites in the Nduli and Luchaba Nature Reserves using pitfall traps. A total of 2054 specimens belonging to three phyla (Arthropoda, Mollusca and Annelida) was caught and sorted into seven orders, 18 families, one tribe, 45 genera (22 identified to species level) and 20 morphospecies. Higher species richness occurred in ‘Indigenous Forest’ and ‘Mixed Alien’ sub-sites while higher specimen counts were made in invaded (‘Mixed Alien’ and ‘Eucalyptus’) sub-sites during summer months, peaking in January. Canonical Correspondence Analysis results show that some measured site variables, e.g. litter depth, grazing intensity, percentage of alien vege- tation cover, and soil chemical properties accounted for invertebrate taxa composition and distribution trends at sub-sites. Although habitat-patch level characteristics (including abiotic factors) were important for determining species distributions, increased levels of infestation by invasive alien vegetation across sub-sites did not necessarily impact on epigaeic invertebrates
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Annual
    EASTERN CAPE PARKS AND TOURISM ANNUAL REPORT 2018/19 REPORT ANNUAL AND TOURISM EASTERN CAPE PARKS 17-25 Oxford Street | East London | 5213 East London | PO Box 11235 | Southernwood | East London | 5213 Eastern Cape | South Africa +27 (0) 43 492 0881 [email protected] www.visiteasterncape.co.za RP290/2019 ISBN: 978-0-621-47767-2 ANNUAL REPORT Long-beaked common dolphin COVER Photo credit: Mark M Gottlieb – www.MarksAdventures.com Hole in the Wall Photo credit: Marius Labuschagne Pounding waves have helped shape South Africa’s coastline for 160 million years - since continental rifting tore Africa from the ancestral landmass Gondwana, leaving her edges exposed to a unique blend of currents and seas. National Geographic Gondwana was an ancient supercontinent that broke up about 180 million years ago. The continent eventually split into landmasses we recognize today: Africa, South America, Australia, Antarctica, the Indian subcontinent and the Arabian Peninsula. CONTENTS PG 5 GENERAL INFORMATION 1 PUBLIC.................................................................................................. ENTITY’S GENERAL INFORMATION 7 2 BO..................................................................................................ARD MEMBERS 8 3 LI...............................................................................................ST OF ABBREVIATIONS/ACRONYMS 10 1 AUDITOR’S REPORT: PREDETERMINED OBJECTIVES 4 FO................................................................................................REWORD BY THE CHAIRPERSON
    [Show full text]
  • Connochaetes Gnou – Black Wildebeest
    Connochaetes gnou – Black Wildebeest Blue Wildebeest (C. taurinus) (Grobler et al. 2005 and ongoing work at the University of the Free State and the National Zoological Gardens), which is most likely due to the historic bottlenecks experienced by C. gnou in the late 1800s. The evolution of a distinct southern endemic Black Wildebeest in the Pleistocene was associated with, and possibly driven by, a shift towards a more specialised kind of territorial breeding behaviour, which can only function in open habitat. Thus, the evolution of the Black Wildebeest was directly associated with the emergence of Highveld-type open grasslands in the central interior of South Africa (Ackermann et al. 2010). Andre Botha Assessment Rationale Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern*† This is an endemic species occurring in open grasslands in the central interior of the assessment region. There are National Red List status (2004) Least Concern at least an estimated 16,260 individuals (counts Reasons for change No change conducted between 2012 and 2015) on protected areas across the Free State, Gauteng, North West, Northern Global Red List status (2008) Least Concern Cape, Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) Protected (KZN) provinces (mostly within the natural distribution range). This yields a total mature population size of 9,765– CITES listing None 11,382 (using a 60–70% mature population structure). This Endemic Yes is an underestimate as there are many more subpopulations on wildlife ranches for which comprehensive data are *Watch-list Threat †Conservation Dependent unavailable. Most subpopulations in protected areas are stable or increasing.
    [Show full text]
  • Prey Selection and Use of Natural and Man-Made Barriers by African Wild Dogs While Hunting
    Prey selection and use of natural and man-made barriers by African wild dogs while hunting Ruth Rhodes & Grant Rhodes* School of Botany and Zoology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville, 3209 South Africa Received 20 January 2004. Accepted 10 May 2004 The hunting patterns of a pack of African wild dogs (Lycaon pictus) were monitored on an 8356 ha reserve in the Waterberg Mountains, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Some members of the pack were radio-collared and the dogs were followed daily by researchers from April 2002 to January 2003. Prey selection and the use of barriers during the wild dogs’ hunts were studied. Barriers were defined as objects such as game fences, flowing rivers and dams, which impeded a fleeing prey animal’s escape. Kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) comprised the majority (60%) of the dogs’ kills, although they made up only 14% of the total prey items available to the dogs. Wild dogs in the reserve made 81% of their kills within 20 m of a barrier, although these 20 m zones made up only 1.7% of the total area available to the dogs in the reserve. Being able to factor the use of barriers into their hunts could explain the preponderance of large prey in their diet. Because wild dogs make most of their kills near or at barriers, there are important management implications of having wild dogs in small reserves. These include ensuring that fences are sturdy and monitored for damage which might occur during hunts. The ability of wild dogs to successfully target the larger prey animals may also have an effect on the carnivore/prey balance and should be monitored carefully.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Habitat Structure and Troop Size in Eastern Cape
    Distribution, habitat structure and troop size in Eastern Cape samango monkeys Cercopithecus albogularis labiatus (Primates: Cercopithecoidea) A dissertation submitted to the Department of Zoology and Entomology in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Zoology the University of Fort Hare by Vusumzi Martins Supervisors: Dr Fabien Génin and Prof. Judith Masters GENERAL ABSTRACT The samango monkey subspecies Cercopithecus albogularis labiatus is endemic to South Africa, and known to occur in Afromontane forests. There has been a major decline in this subspecies, exceeding 30% in some populations over the past 30 years, primarily as a result of the loss of suitable habitat. A second samango subspecies, C. a. erythrarchus, occurs near the northern border of South Africa, mainly in coastal lowland forest, and the distributions of the two subspecies do not overlap. C. a. labiatus was thought to be confined to Afromontane forests, but the study described here focused on C. a. labiatus populations that were recently identified in the Indian Ocean Belt forests near East London. I undertook to assess the distribution of C. a. labiatus in the Eastern Cape, to evaluate the habitat structures of the Afromontane and Indian Ocean coastal belt forests, and to understand the effect these habitats have on essential aspects of the socio-ecology of the C. a. labiatus populations. Distribution surveys were conducted in protected areas throughout the Eastern Cape, and samango monkeys were found to be present within forest patches in the Amatola Mountains, Eastern Cape dune forests and the Transkei coastal scarp forests. The sizes and composition of two troops were assessed: one troop in the Amatole forests and one in the Eastern Cape dune forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Hopping and Running on Two Legs Or Four from R
    Nature Vol. 287 18 September 1980 187 Hopping and running on two legs or four from R. McNeil/ Alexander MOST mammals run on all fours but some run on just two legs (like men) or hop (like kangaroos). Some birds run, some hop and some do both. What are the relative merits of the different gaits? Do they differ in energy cost? Energy costs of running and hopping can be inferred from measurements of oxygen consumption. Some of the difficulties of physiological experimentation on moving animals can be avoided by training the Dipodomys deserti hopping on a moving belt to assess energy consumption. Experimental details animal to run on a moving belt as are given by Thompson et al. on p.223 of this issue of Nature. shown. Data has been collected for mammals ranging from mice to horses and different for animals of different sizes. running because it involves larger fluc­ lions, and for many birds (summarized by Until recently the data seemed to indicate tuations of potential energy (Alexander & 0 6 Fedak & Seeherman Nature 282, 713; that k was proportional to (body mass) · Goldspink Mechanics and energetics of 1979). Nearly all of it conforms to a simple for quadrupeds but to (body mass)0·8 for animal locomotion, 1977). rule: the power Prequired for level running bipeds. Consequently bipedalism was more Similar calculations grossly under­ at speed u is given by economical than quadrupedalism for small estimate the power requirements of small animals, but less economical for large ones. runners and hoppers, such as mice and P(.u)=P(O)+ku (1) Why, then, are there small quadrupeds quail: indeed they predict that k should be (such as mice) and large bipeds (such as proportional to (body mass)1.
    [Show full text]
  • April/May/June Issue Is $9.00
    Vol.48 | No.2 | Apr May Jun | 2013 the official publication of the Basenji Club of America, Inc. CO NTENTS GREAT DANE PHOTOS DANE GREAT BCOA BULLETIN On the cover a PR, maY, JUN 2013 Max, 2012 AKC/Eukanuba Agility Invitational Top Basenji flying high DEP ARTMENTS Agility Basenjis are shaped not born. Alyce Sumita shares what she has learned about training for agility F07 rom the President STORY PAGE 18 08 About this Issue 09 Contributors O 22 UT OF THE BOX AD brEAK OWN OF STRAIGHT anD OVAL TRACK racING 10 Letters BY PARRY TaLLMADGE 12 Junior Eye View 14 Points of View 24 ASFA JUDGES’ BREED RANKING SURVEY J RUDGING FO EXCELLENCE IN brEED TYPE 17 A Note BY SuSAN WEINKEIN UDP ATES 26 OBEDIENCE & BASENJIS BEJ AS N IS LEARN WHEN WE pay ATTENTION 46 Committee Reports BY SANDI ATKINSON 47 Club columns H30 W at it takes TO be OBEDIENT CLRF A I YING THE CLASSES Ta LLIES, TITLES & REPORTS BY BRENDA PHILLIPS 51 Conformation Honor Rolls 32 A TRACKER’S JOURNEY 56 Performance Honor Rolls OR U HOUNDS TURN THEIR SIGHT on SCENT 57 OFA Reports BY TERRY COX FIEDLER 60 New AKC Titles 36 A BASENJI DRAFT ODYSSEY 64 2013 Standings BEJ AS N IS PULL THEIR WEIGHT 63 New ASFA, LGRA, NOTRA Titles BY RENEE MERIauX 0 4 K9 NOSE WORK Sc ENT SEEKING MISSILES WITH CINDY SmITH OF THE RIGHT STEPS 66 BCOA & BHE Financials NT42 SA É SupporI T NG THE FOUNDATION FOR HEALTH RESEARCH BY LEEBETH CRANMER BCOA Bulletin (APR/MAY/JUN ’13) 1 The Official Publication of the Basenji Club of America, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals of Africa
    Silver 49 Bronze 26 Gold 59 Copper 17 Animals of Africa _______________________________________________Diamond 80 PYGMY ANTELOPES Klipspringer Common oribi Haggard oribi Gold 59 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Copper 17 Bronze 26 Silver 49 Gold 61 Copper 17 Diamond 80 Diamond 80 Steenbok 1 234 5 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Cape grysbok BIG CATS LECHWE, KOB, PUKU Sharpe grysbok African lion 1 2 2 2 Common lechwe Livingstone suni African leopard***** Kafue Flats lechwe East African suni African cheetah***** _______________________________________________ Red lechwe Royal antelope SMALL CATS & AFRICAN CIVET Black lechwe Bates pygmy antelope Serval Nile lechwe 1 1 2 2 4 _______________________________________________ Caracal 2 White-eared kob DIK-DIKS African wild cat Uganda kob Salt dik-dik African golden cat CentralAfrican kob Harar dik-dik 1 2 2 African civet _______________________________________________ Western kob (Buffon) Guenther dik-dik HYENAS Puku Kirk dik-dik Spotted hyena 1 1 1 _______________________________________________ Damara dik-dik REEDBUCKS & RHEBOK Brown hyena Phillips dik-dik Common reedbuck _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________African striped hyena Eastern bohor reedbuck BUSH DUIKERS THICK-SKINNED GAME Abyssinian bohor reedbuck Southern bush duiker _______________________________________________African elephant 1 1 1 Sudan bohor reedbuck Angolan bush duiker (closed) 1 122 2 Black rhinoceros** *** Nigerian
    [Show full text]