Reports on the Montreal Climate Change Conference

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reports on the Montreal Climate Change Conference ,9Ê",1 A QUARTERLY JOURNAL FOR DEBATING ENERGY ISSUES AND POLICIES CONTENTS Issue 64 February 2006 Economic Implications of the Oil Price Increase Roger Van Noorden Hassan Hakimian We are starting 2006 with a look at the way in which the high Walid Khadduri − page 3 current price of oil might affect our economic expectations and Environmental Issues how the oil producers are dealing with this sudden increase in their Malcolm Keay revenues. This will be a subject of particular interest to those of our Benito Müller − page 10 readers who can easily recall the experiences of the 1970s. We also have two articles dealing with aspects of environmental policy, one The Role of Technology in reducing E&P Costs that looks at the role of technology in reducing EP costs and one Mark Andersen − page 14 that looks at Gas Strategies for suppliers of the Atlantic Basin. The Strategies of non- Roger Van Noorden looks macro- syphoned off into stabilisation OECD Gas Producers economically at the oil price funds rather than being spent. Hadi Hallouche, Michael increase. He picks out three Nevertheless, the way in which Tamvakis and Bryan Train − apparent problems, sets out an the very extensive remainder is page 16 answer to each and then discusses spent is crucial. It is needed in Personal Commentary these answers. The three problems social expenditure generally rather Charles Henderson – page concern the United States’ trade than in the over-supplied military 19 deficit, the persistent budget investment. Youth unemploy- deficits of many Western econo- ment is the most acute challenge Asinus Muses − page 20 mies and the absence of inflation. for Middle East governments. Although all three have so far Inflation remains a threat, as do been under relative control and property and local stock exchange have not as yet upset international prices. The outlook remains un- economic balances he concludes certain. that we are not necessarily out of Walid Khadduri considers the situ- the wood. ation of the Arab oil producers, Hassan Hakimian looks at the particularly in their ability to ab- problem of managing the new sorb the new streams of revenue. wealth from the producers’ point One hopeful sign is the privatisa- of view and questions whether tion of state companies and public this time they can make a positive investment opportunities provided and lasting effect on their do- by family firms, although the mestic economies. He finds some national oil companies themselves evidence that this is so. One remain out of bounds. Another is hopeful sign is, for instance, that the policy focus on debt reduction some of the extra revenue is being and restructuring. While money OXFORD ENERGY FORUM FEBRUARY 2006 is for the most part being invested locally or with gas rather than oil reserves, those with regionally there is, however, a grave danger undeveloped gas reserves and those who are from stock market and property speculation, niche players. Their geographical location and and there is always the threat presented by the the extent of state involvement in their opera- ever-present problem of regional politics. tions are further elements in defining how best individual countries should develop their gas Looking to the environmental issues, Malcolm reserves. Keay raises the important question of how to measure progress. As he points out, govern- Lastly, the Personal Commentary in this issue ments are at present unable to measure outputs is by Charles Henderson who muses on the from policy decisions even though the desired nature of the so-called Gas Crisis in the UK, a outputs are easy enough to state. He gives the particularly appropriate subject in the light of examples of energy efficiency and renewables the more recent problems highlighted by the and shows how neither is subject to any mean- actions of Gazprom in Ukraine. ingful measurement. His message is brutal – if governments want to take climate change seri- ously they will have to start taking measure- Contributors to this issue ment issues seriously. A more enthusiastic message comes from MARK ANDERSEN is Executive Editor, Benito Müller in his report from the latest Schlumberger Oilfield Review, Houston ‘Kyoto’ meeting (working under the peculiar HASSAN HAKIMIAN is Associate Dean, Cass acronym of COP/MOP) in Montreal. First, Business School, City University, London the Marrakesh Accords were adopted; second, a compromise was reached on the question of HADI HALLOUCHE is at the Centre for Shipping, compliance with the Kyoto targets; third, the Trade and Finance, Cass Business School, City Clean Development Mechanism was improved; University, London and, finally, an agreement (of sorts) was reached CHARLES HENDERSON recently retired as on negotiations for a post-2012 regime. None Chairman of Total in the UK of this was certain before the delegates arrived. MALCOLM KEAY is Senior Research Fellow at the Turning to the capacity of technology to reduce Oxford Institute for Energy Studies E&P costs, Mark Andersen points out that WALID KHADDURI is Economic Editor of al- from 1981 to 2003 E&P costs reduced by two- Hayat newspaper thirds. Now they are rising, but he describes some of the ways in which technical develop- BENITO MÜLLER is Senior Research Fellow at ment has been able (and hopefully will continue the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies and to be able) to reduce these effects. Furthermore, Managing Director of Oxford Climate Policy some of these new developments are the result MICHAEL TAMVAKIS is at the Centre for Shipping, of research by the service companies, so that Trade and Finance, Cass Business School, City there is now good reason for a greater and University, London more willing cooperation between the oil and service companies. BRIAN TRAIN is at the Centre for Shipping, Trade and Finance, Cass Business School, City We also have an article by Hadi Hallouche, University, London Michael Tamvakis and Bryan Train on the strategies of non-OECD gas producers in the ROGER VAN NOORDEN is a Fellow in Economics Atlantic and Middle East. Their analysis leads at Hertford College, Oxford and a Governor them to define gas producers in terms of those of the Institute for Energy Studies 2 OXFORD ENERGY FORUM FEBRUARY 2006 Economic Implications of the Oil Price Increase Roger Van Noorden Domestic Product suggested by the other contrasts. In 1973 the North Sea Maastricht agreement. If a single Continental Shelf had not been devel- considers some country operated at this level it would oped, so there were not the benefits to have been under pressure to reduce offset the rise in the price of oil. The macroeconomic government spending, but the recent main difference, however, in the UK implications deliberate weakening of the Growth is that in the labour markets of the and Stability Pact suggests there 1970s union power and wage indexing Three Problems is safety in numbers. In Italy, for implied that price rises fed quickly example, which has had 20 percent into rises in earnings, and this second- While my undergraduates learn their more inflation than Germany since ary effect then had a major impact macroeconomic theory they are the Euro was established in 1999, a on prices. The wage indexation came encouraged to follow three real life conventional macroeconomic response from a particular form of incomes problems, as the statistics emerge would be a cut back in spending policy, the ‘threshold’ in operation month by month. The good students and a raising of taxation to induce a from November 1973 to November ask whether and how the three slowdown of the economy. With so 1974, whereby increases above 7 problems are connected. many countries in the same position percent in prices led to matching in- The first problem is why the dollar no collective pressure is being applied creases in wage rates. So far in the UK remains strong when the US trade to individual countries which can during this period of oil price rises deficit has just established a new promise to bring down their budget there has been no appreciable feeding monthly record of $68 billion. The deficits over a period of years. While through of energy prices to earnings. second is how so many Western it might be expected that interest rates This has been due in part to the lack economies function with persistent should rise in countries with persistent of pressure on the labour supply. Net government budget deficits of more budget deficits − so that governments immigration is running at 200,000 a than 3 percent of their Gross Domes- can induce private sector lending to year, and this is about the same as the tic Products. The third is to account cover their deficits − governments annual job creation. Earnings figures for the non-emergence of inflation, have in fact been fortunate in being are rising only at around 3.9 percent given the similarities between the cur- able to borrow at record low real per year − a level justified by adding rent rises in energy prices and those of interest rates. The nominal yields on productivity gains to the inflation 1973−74 and 1978−79. ten-year government bonds are below rate − and are not an independent 3.5 percent in the Euro area. source of inflation. In the Euro area The Immediate Answers as a whole wage inflation is likely to be gentle and price inflation subdued. There is an immediate and well That argument would however suggest understood answer to the first prob- “With so many countries that higher energy prices would have lem. Although the US current account a greater impact on the United States, deficit has risen to about 6 percent of in the same position no collective pressure is being where growth above 3 percent a year Gross Domestic Product, and there continues and the labour market is are also deficits in the UK and Eastern applied to individual tighter.
Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 I Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2011 i Shell Sustainability Report 2011 Introduction CONTENTS ABOUT SHELL INTRODUCTION Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies employing 90,000 people in more than 80 i ABOUT SHELL countries. Our aim is to help meet the energy needs of 1 INTRODUCTION FROM THE CEO society in ways that are economically, environmentally and socially responsible. OUR APPROACH Upstream 2 BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE ENERGY FUTURE Upstream consists of two organisations, Upstream International and Upstream Americas. Upstream searches for and recovers oil 3 SD AND OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY and natural gas, extracts heavy oil from oil sands for conversion 4 SAFETY into synthetic crudes, liqueƂ es natural gas and produces synthetic oil products using gas-to-liquids technology. It often works in joint 5 COMMUNITIES ventures, including those with national oil companies. Upstream 6 CLIMATE CHANGE markets and trades natural gas and electricity in support of its business. Our wind power activities are part of Upstream. Upstream 8 ENVIRONMENT International co-ordinates sustainable development policies and 9 LIVING BY OUR PRINCIPLES social performance across Shell. Downstream OUR ACTIVITIES Downstream manufactures, supplies and markets oil products and 10 SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION chemicals worldwide. Our Manufacturing and Supply businesses include reƂ neries, chemical plants and the supply and distribution 11 KEY PROJECTS of feedstocks and products. Marketing sells a range of products 12 DELIVERING ENERGY RESPONSIBLY including fuels, lubricants, bitumen and liqueƂ ed petroleum 12 Natural gas gas for home, transport and industrial use. Chemicals markets 15 The Arctic petrochemicals for industrial customers.
    [Show full text]
  • $1.1Bln ■ Developing Nigerian Talent and Supply Chains
    16 SHELL IN NIGERIA A team of employees at Shell ECONOMY 17 Nigeria Gas facility at Agbara, Ogun State Nigeria. POWERING NIGERIA’S 678k SPDCJV BARRELS OF OIL EQUIVALENT SNEPCo ECONOMY PER DAY PRODUCED IN 2019 Nigeria’s oil and gas resources can power a diverse economy, expand domestic industries and increase the prosperity of $1.5bln its people. In 2019, Shell Companies in $ IN TAXES AND ROYALTIES Nigeria paid about $1.5 billion3 in taxes IN 2019 (SPDC & SNEPCo) and royalties to the Nigerian government. With business interests from the oil and gas producing heartlands of the Niger Delta to the growing industries of Ogun State and Lagos, Shell Companies in Nigeria 3,000 provide technical expertise, a global perspective and EMPLOYEES strong governance that can unlock opportunities for Nigeria and Nigerians. ■ Prosperity through power. ■ A pipeline of projects. ■ Future opportunities in deep-water. $1.1bln ■ Developing Nigerian talent and supply chains. SPENT ON CONTRACTS TO NIGERIAN COMPANIES IN 2019 (SCiN) The Nigeria Briefing Notes update on activities and programmes undertaken by several Nigerian companies either wholly-owned by Shell or in which Shell has an interest. Together these are referred to as the Shell Companies in Nigeria (SCiN). Four of these are: ■ Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC); a wholly-owned Shell subsidiary, which operates an unincorporated joint venture (SPDC JV) in which SPDC holds a 30% interest. ■ Two other wholly-owned Shell subsidiaries; Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Limited (SNEPCo) and Shell Nigeria Gas Limited (SNG). ■ And Nigeria Liquefied Natural Gas (NLNG) Limited; an incorporated joint venture in which Shell has a 25.6% interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell: We Will Remember Ken Saro-Wiwa and Friends
    Shell: We Will Remember Ken Saro-Wiwa and Friends "I and my colleagues are not the only ones on trial. Shell is here on trial and it is as well that it is represented by counsel said to be holding a watching brief. The Company has, indeed, ducked this particular trial, but its day will surely come and the lessons learnt here may prove useful to it for there is no doubt in my mind that the ecological war that the company has waged in the Delta will be called to question sooner than later and the crimes of that war be duly punished. The crime of the Company’s dirty wars against the Ogoni people will also be punished." Ken Saro- Wiwa - 1995 Thursday, 10 November marks the 10th Anniversary of the murder of Ken Saro-Wiwa and his eight colleagues, Baribor Bera, Saturday Dobee, Nordu Eawo, Daniel Gbokoo, Barinem Kiobel, John Kpuinen, Paul Levura and Felix Nuate by the State of Nigeria for campaigning against the devastation of the Niger Delta by oil companies, especially Shell. They represented the “Movement for Survival of the Ogoni Peoples’.” Who is Ken Saro-Wiwa: Ken, was an academic, civil servant, businessman, author and most importantly at his death, a community activist. In 1990, Saro-Wiwa started to dedicate himself to the amelioration of the problems of the oil producing regions of the Niger Delta. Focusing on his homeland, Ogoni, he launched a non-violent movement for social and ecological justice - MOSOP. In this role he challenged the oil companies and the Nigerian government accusing them of waging an ecological war against the Ogoni and precipitating the genocide of the Ogoni people.
    [Show full text]
  • The People of Nigeria Versus Shell: the Case: Step by Step
    Factsheet The people of Nigeria versus Shell: The case: step by step Victims of oil pollution from Shell installations in Nigeria, in conjunction with Milieudefensie, have started legal proceedings against Shell Nigeria and Royal Dutch Shell plc (the parent company) in the Netherlands. Three cases of oil pollution in three different villages are being brought before the court in three separate legal cases: the cases of Oruma, Goi and Ikot Ada Udo. In this factsheet Milieudefensie describes the progress of the cases in chronological order and attempts to sketch the further course of the proceedings. before a Dutch court. According to the Nigerian Residents of the Niger Delta and Nigerian and plaintiffs and Milieudefensie, however, the Shell foreign environmental organisations have been concern operates as a single unit and it is protesting for decades against abuses by Shell therefore lawful to jointly try both companies and other companies in producing oil. After legal (Shell Nigeria and the Dutch headquarters in the proceedings in Nigeria itself were found to be Netherlands) in the proceedings. The first session ineffective, four Nigerian farmers, Friends of the of the case in the courthouse in The Hague deals Earth Nigeria and Milieudefensie (Friends of the with this issue. Earth Netherlands) decided to jointly bring both Shell Nigeria and Shell’s headquarters in the 8 July 2009: Response by the lawyers for the Netherlands before the Dutch court in connection farmers and Milieudefensie (Oruma) with these three clearly distressing cases. You can In a written response, the lawyer for the Nigerian read the full history and background on farmers and Milieudefensie refutes claims made www.shellcourtcase.org (in English) in May by Shell on the jurisdiction of the Dutch www.milieudefensie.nl/english/shell/the-people- court and gives a provisional response to Shell’s of-nigeria-versus-shell] statements on the factual occurrences in Oruma.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate of Concern Royal Dutch Shell Transcript
    Climate Of Concern Royal Dutch Shell Transcript Disapproving and transcriptional Christorpher assists her Croat forewarn monstrously or abscised grudgingly, is bloodily.Corrie Eozoic? How butyraceous Unrecompensed is Lucio Waiter when recrystallize octopod and unmanfully dismissible and Desmund obstreperously, changes she some tie herderegulations? wickiups girdings From the eu to change: thank you let me that it will join with respect of uncertainty, was delighted and it fostered a transcript of climate concern over time Is leisure the sales team who drive out there facing the affair day after day? With the wider circumstances will chip away, deer park the transcript of climate concern for areas largely being simple moralistic or additional comments. OECD or United Nations or whatever. The deputy assistant professor of shell? The dutch shell and which they are creating common european sports car manufacturers. Another growth opportunity in the transcripts of concerned about rising temperatures continue with host a major projects are increasing is half of this asymmetry was. We hear such cautious statements and beam failure will make use the handwriting it oughit makes it harder. But underneath all sample a household purpose, California needed a ruling from the EPA to allow them who set stricter fuel economy standards than the federal government. They were concerned about climate crisis not? The concerns of concerned. But doing would seem wise to ship the dough to offspring would be game set a standard in strain of emissions. Andrew at the president bush. It night the responsibility of the CMD to make major framework in Nigeria. Roace targets in shell of concerns about the dutch shell itself its reliance on.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Dutch Shell and Its Sustainability Troubles
    Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 Albert ten Kate May 2011 1 Colophon Title: Royal Dutch Shell and its sustainability troubles Background report to the Erratum of Shell's Annual Report 2010 May 2011. This report is made on behalf of Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) Author: Albert ten Kate, free-lance researcher corporate social responsibility Pesthuislaan 61 1054 RH Amsterdam phone: (+31)(0)20 489 29 88 mobile: (+31)(0)6 185 68 354 e-mail: [email protected] 2 Contents Introduction 4 Methodology 5 Cases: 1. Muddling through in Nigeria 6 1a) oil spills 1b) primitive gas flaring 1c) conflict and corruption 2. Denial of Brazilian pesticide diseases 14 3. Mining the Canadian tar sands 17 4. The bitter taste of Brazil's sugarcane 20 4a) sourcing sugarcane from occupiers of indigenous land 4b) bad labour conditions sugarcane harvesters 4c) massive monoculture land use 5. Fracking unconventional gas 29 6. Climate change, a business case? 35 7. Interfering with politics 38 8. Drilling plans Alaska’s Arctic Ocean 42 9. Sakhalin: the last 130 Western Gray Whales 45 10. The risky Kashagan oil field 47 11. A toxic legacy in Curaçao 49 12. Philippines: an oil depot amidst a crowd of people 52 3 Introduction Measured in revenue, Royal Dutch Shell is one of the biggest companies in the world. According to its annual report of 2010, its revenue amounted to USD 368 billion in 2010. Shell produces oil and gas in 30 countries, spread over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report on Form 20-F
    United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 Commission file number 1-32575 Royal Dutch Shell plc (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR, The Hague, The Netherlands tel. no: (011 31 70) 377 9111 (Address of principal executive offices) Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered American Depositary Receipts representing Class A ordinary shares of the New York Stock Exchange issuer of an aggregate nominal value €0.07 each American Depositary Receipts representing Class B ordinary shares of the New York Stock Exchange issuer of an aggregate nominal value of €0.07 each Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act None Securities For Which There is a Reporting Obligation Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. Outstanding as of December 31, 2005: 3,817,240,213 Class A ordinary shares of the nominal value of €0.07 each. 2,707,858,347 Class B ordinary shares of the nominal value of €0.07 each. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Shell Sustainability Report, Which Covers Our Performance in 2016 and Significant Changes and Events During the Year
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Royal Dutch Shell plc Sustainability Report 2016 03 39 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OUR PERFORMANCE 04 Introduction from the CEO 40 Safety 06 Topic selection for 2016 43 Security 08 About Shell 43 Environment 10 How sustainability works at Shell 48 Social performance 14 Sustainability governance 53 Embedding sustainability into projects COVER IMAGE The cover shows how collaborations and discussions with communities, 15 55 customers and partners worldwide ENERGY TRANSITION WORKING TOGETHER help Shell provide more and cleaner 16 Towards a low-carbon future 56 Living by our principles energy solutions. 18 Our work to address climate change 57 Environmental and social partners DIGITAL 24 Natural gas 60 Collaborations The Sustainability Report has moved to 25 Liquefied natural gas 61 Shell Foundation an online digital report 26 Research and development 62 Contractors and suppliers reports.shell.com. The digital version 28 Lower-carbon alternatives 63 Our people includes further information such as an interactive GRI index to enhance 64 Our business partners usability for and the experience of the 65 Tax and transparency readers of the report. In the event of 32 any conflict, discrepancy or MANAGING OPERATIONS inconsistency between the digital 33 Our activities in Nigeria 66 report and this hardcopy report of the 35 Oil sands DATA AND REPORTING Sustainability Report then the 36 Shales 67 Abour our reporting information contained in the digital report will prevail. This hardcopy 37 Decommissioning and restoration 68 Environmental data report is provided for the readers’ 38 Measuring the impact of earthquakes in 69 Social and safety data convenience only. Groningen 70 External Review Committee NEW LENS SCENARIOS CAUTIONARY NOTE (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in This publication contains data from The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling Shell’s New Lens Scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • All for Shell: a Brief History of the Struggle for Justice in the Niger Delta1
    All for Shell: A brief history of the struggle for justice in the Niger Delta1 Shell started producing oil in the Delta in 1958. In 1970 the first seeds of the current conflict were sown when Ogoni Chiefs handed a petition to the local Military Governor complaining about Shell, then operating a joint venture with BP. According to the petition, the company was “seriously threatening the well-being, and even the very lives” of the Ogoni1. That year there was a major blow-out at the Bomu oilfield in Ogoni. It continued for three weeks, causing widespread pollution and outrage2. By the eighties other communities were beginning to protest. The Iko people wrote to Shell in 1980 demanding “compensation and restitution of our rights to clean air, water and a viable environment where we can source for our means of livelihood.” Two years later, when the Iko organised a peaceful rally against Shell, the company called the police3. In 1987, when the Iko once again held a peaceful demonstration against Shell, the notorious Mobile Police Force (MPF), locally known as “kill-and-go” was called. 40 houses were destroyed and 350 people were made homeless by the MPF’s attack. 4 In August 1990, the Ogoni elders signed the Ogoni Bill of Rights, which called for “political control of Ogoni affairs by Ogoni people, control and use of Ogoni economic resources for Ogoni development, adequate and direct representation as of right for Ogoni people in all Nigerian national institutions and the right to protect the Ogoni environment and ecology from further degradation”5.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigerian Oil and Gas Market Subsea UK – 2014
    Nigerian Oil and Gas Market Subsea UK – 2014 AUSTIN UZOKA MANAGER, NIGERIAN CONTENT DEVELOPMENT (NCD) 1 Definitions and Cautionary Note The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this presentation “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this presentation refer to companies over which Royal Dutch Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. Companies over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to “joint ventures” and companies over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control are referred to as “associates”. In this presentation, joint ventures and associates may also be referred to as “equity-accounted investments”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect (for example, through our 23% shareholding in Woodside Petroleum Ltd.) ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all third-party interest. This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Shell Annual Report and Form 20-F
    ANNUAL REPORT Royal Dutch Shell plc Annual Report and Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 01 106 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 01 Form 20-F AND SUPPLEMENTS 02 Cross reference to Form 20-F 106 Consolidated Financial Statements 04 Terms and abbreviations 153 Supplementary information – oil and 05 About this Report gas (unaudited) 173 Parent Company Financial Statements 06 185 Royal Dutch Shell Dividend Access Trust STRATEGIC REPORT Financial Statements 06 Chairman’s message 07 Chief Executive Officer’s review 190 08 Risk factors ADDITIONAL 13 Business overview INFORMATION 15 Strategy and outlook 190 Shareholder information 16 Market overview 197 Section 13(r) of the US Securities 18 Summary of results Exchange Act of 1934 disclosure 20 Performance indicators 198 Non-GAAP measures reconciliations 22 Selected financial data and other definitions 23 Upstream 200 Exhibits 41 Downstream 48 Corporate 49 Liquidity and capital resources Cover images 53 Environment and society 60 Our people The cover shows some of the ways that Shell helps to meet the world’s diverse energy needs – from supplying gas for cooking, heating, 62 and generating electricity for GOVERNANCE homes and businesses, to liquefied natural gas (LNG) to fuel trucks 62 The Board of Royal Dutch Shell plc and ships. Pearl, the world’s largest 65 Senior Management gas-to-liquids (GTL) plant, makes 66 Directors’ Report lubricants, fuels and products for 69 Corporate governance plastics. Prelude, the world’s largest floating LNG facility, will produce 83 Audit Committee Report LNG off the coast of Australia. 86 Directors’ Remuneration Report Designed by Conran Design Group carbon neutral natureOffice.com | NL-215-168617 Typeset by RR Donnelley print production Printed by Tuijtel under ISO 14001 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Deferred Prosecution Agreement
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § § v. § CRIMINAL NO.: § SHELL NIGERIA EXPLORATION § AND PRODUCTION § COMPANY LTD. § § Defendant. § DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT The United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section ("the Department"), defendant Shell Nigeria Exploration and Production Company Ltd. ("SNEPCO"), a Nigerian corporation, by its undersigned attorneys, and Royal Dutch Shell pIc ("RDS"), on behalf of its wholly-owned subsidiary SNEPCO, enter into this Deferred Prosecution Agreement ("the Agreement"). The terms and conditions of this Agreement are as follows: Criminal Information and Acceptance of Responsibility 1. SNEPCO acknowledges that the United States will file the attached two-count criminal Information ("the Information") in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas charging SNEPCO with conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States in violation of Title IS, United States Code, Section 371, that is, to violate the anti-bribery provision of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA"), as amended, Title 15, United States Code, Section 7Sdd-3, and to violate the books and records provisions of the FCPA, Title 15, United States Code, Sections 18m (b)(2)(A), 78m(b)(5), and 78ff(a) (Count One), and with aiding and abetting a violation of the books and records provisions of the FepA, Title 15, United States Code, SectIons 78m(b )(2)(A), 7Sm(b )(5), and 7Sff(a) (Count Two). 2. SNEPCO knowingly waives: (a) its right to indictment on these charges, as well as all rights to a speedy trial pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Title IS, United States Code, Section 3161, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 4S(b); and (b) any objection with respect to venue and consents to the filing of the Information, as provided under the terms of this Agreement, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
    [Show full text]