DOCSLIB.ORG

2008 Annual Report and Form 20-F for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Contact Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2008 Annual Report and Form 20-F for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Contact Information ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 DELIVERY & GROWTH REPORT ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 OUR BUSINESS With around 102,000 employees in more than 100 countries and DOWNSTREAM territories, Shell helps to meet the world’s growing demand for Our Oil Sands business, the Athabasca Oil Sands Project, extracts energy in economically, environmentally and socially bitumen – an especially thick, heavy oil – from oil sands in responsible ways. Alberta, western Canada, and converts it to synthetic crude oils that can be turned into a range of products. UPSTREAM Our Exploration & Production business searches for and recovers Our Oil Products business makes, moves and sells a range of oil and natural gas around the world. Many of these activities petroleum-based products around the world for domestic, are carried out as joint venture partnerships, often with national industrial and transport use. Its Future Fuels and CO2 business oil companies. unit develops biofuels and hydrogen and markets the synthetic fuel and products made from the GTL process. It also leads Our Gas & Power business liquefies natural gas and transports company-wide activities in CO2 management. With around it to customers across the world. Its gas to liquids (GTL) process 45,000 service stations, ours is the world’s largest single-branded turns natural gas into cleaner-burning synthetic fuel and other fuel retail network. products. It develops wind power to generate electricity and is involved in solar power technology. It also licenses our coal Our Chemicals business produces petrochemicals for industrial gasification technology, enabling coal to be used as a chemical customers. They include the raw materials for plastics, coatings feedstock and for more efficient generation of electricity. and detergents used in the manufacture of textiles, medical supplies and computers. CHEMICAL PRODUCTS USED FOR: UPGRADER • Plastics PLANT • Coatings • Detergents CHEMICAL MINING PLANT OIL SANDS REFINERY GAS TO BIOFUELS LIQUIDS PLANT PLANT REFINED OIL PRODUCTS • (Bio) Fuels • Lubricants • Bitumen • Liquefied petroleum gas ON AND OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS GAS AND ELECTRICITY • Industrial use • Domestic use POWER STATION LNG LNG LIQUEFACTION REGASIFICATION WIND PLANT TERMINAL TURBINES UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 20-F ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 Commission file number 1-32575 Royal Dutch Shell plc (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) England and Wales (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organisation) Carel van Bylandtlaan 30, 2596 HR, The Hague, The Netherlands Tel. no: 011 31 70 377 9111 (Address of principal executive offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered American Depositary Receipts representing Class A ordinary New York Stock Exchange shares of the issuer of an aggregate nominal value e 0.07 each American Depositary Receipts representing Class B ordinary New York Stock Exchange shares of the issuer of an aggregate nominal value of e 0.07 each 5.625% Guaranteed Notes due 2011 New York Stock Exchange 4.95% Guaranteed Notes due 2012 New York Stock Exchange 5.2% Guaranteed Notes due 2017 New York Stock Exchange 6.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2038 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act None Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. Outstanding as of December 31, 2008: 3,455,841,942 RDS Class A ordinary shares of the nominal value of e 0.07 each. 2,665,893,421 RDS Class B ordinary shares of the nominal value of e 0.07 each. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¥ Ye s n No If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. n Ye s ¥ No Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ¥ Ye s n No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer ¥ Accelerated filer n Non-accelerated filer n Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP n International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ¥ Other n If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 n Item 18 n If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). n Ye s ¥ No Copies of notices and communications from the Securities and Exchange Commission should be sent to: Royal Dutch Shell plc Carel van Bylandtlaan 30 2596 HR, The Hague, The Netherlands Attn: Mr. M. Brandjes ABOUT THIS REPORT This Report combines the Annual Report and Accounts and the Annual Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are Report on Form 20-F (Report) for the year ended December 31, 2008, based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve for Royal Dutch Shell plc (Royal Dutch Shell, the Company) and its known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual subsidiaries. It presents the Consolidated Financial Statements of Royal results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or Dutch Shell (pages 113-159) and the Parent Company Financial implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among Statements of Royal Dutch Shell (pages 187-191). This Report complies other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Shell to with all applicable UK regulations. This Report also includes the market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, disclosure included in the Annual Report on Form 20-F, as filed with the estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Cross references to statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as Form 20-F are set out on page 3 of this Report. “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “objectives”, “outlook”, “probably”, “project”, “will”, “seek”, In this Report “Shell” and the “Shell group” are sometimes used for “target”, “risks”, “goals”, “should” and similar terms and phrases. There convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell and its areanumberoffactorsthatcouldaffectthefutureoperationsofShell subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. the forward-looking statements included in this Report, including These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; identifying the particular company or companies. “Subsidiaries”, “Shell (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this Report refer to (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserve estimates; (f) loss of market companies over which Royal Dutch Shell, either directly or indirectly, has share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; control through a majority of the voting rights or the right to exercise (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition control or to obtain the majority of the benefits and be exposed to the properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such majority of the risks. The Consolidated Financial Statements consolidate transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and the financial statements of the Parent Company and all subsidiaries. The countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and companies in which Shell has significant influence but not control are regulatory developments including potential litigation and regulatory referred to as “associated companies” or “associates” and companies in effects arising from recategorisation of reserves; (k) economic and financial which Shell has joint control are referred to as “jointly controlled market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, entities”. Joint ventures are comprised of jointly controlled entities and including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of jointly controlled assets. In this Report, associates and jointly controlled contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the entities are also referred to as “equity-accounted investments”. approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct (m) changes in trading conditions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Offshore Wind and Hydrogen: Solving the Integration Challenge
    OFFSHORE WIND AND HYDROGEN SOLVING THE INTEGRATION CHALLENGE OSW-H2: SOLVING THE INTEGRATION CHALLENGE 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The study was jointly supported by the Offshore Wind Industry Council (OWIC) and Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) Catapult, and delivered by ORE Catapult. The Offshore Wind Industry Council is a senior Government and industry forum established in 2013 to drive the development of the UK’s world- leading offshore wind sector. OWIC is responsible for overseeing implementation of the UK Offshore Wind Industrial Strategy. ORE Catapult is a not-for-profit research organisation, established in 2013 by the UK Government as one of a network of Catapults in high growth industries. It is the UK’s leading innovation centre for offshore renewable energy and helps to create UK economic benefit in the sector by helping to reduce the cost of offshore renewable energy, and support the growth of the industry. AUTHORS: ANGELIKI SPYROUDI KACPER STEFANIAK DAVID WALLACE STEPHANIE MANN GAVIN SMART ZEYNEP KURBAN The authors would like to thank a number of organisations and stakeholders for their support through Steering Committee and Expert Group meetings or individually. They include, in alphabetical order: Atkins (David Cole), BEIS (Tasnim Choudhury, Simone Cooper Searle, David Curran, Rose Galloway – Green, Fiona Mettam, Alan Morgan, Allan Taylor, Mark Taylor, Rita Wadey, Alex Weir) Committee on Climate Change (Mike Hemsley, David Joffe, Julia King), Crown Estate Scotland (Mark McKean), EDF Energy (David Acres), Energy Systems Catapult (Nick
    [Show full text]
  • Royal-Dutch-Shell-Fra-Oljemuseets-Årbok-2018.Pdf
    Nor sk oljemuseum årbok 201 7 Årboken er Norsk Oljemuseums viktigste, årlige publikasjon. Den tar for seg et bredt spekter av aktuelle tema knyttet til petroleumsnæringen og museets virksomhet. Artiklene er skrevet både av museets egne ansatte og eksterne bidragsytere. Museets årsmelding og regnskap er også å finne i årboken. Norsk Oljemuseumoljemuseum Årbokårbok 20172018 Royal Dutch/Shell av Trude Meland hell har drevet sin verdensomspennende En gryende globalisering Svirksomhet i over 100 år og har bygget opp en Det hele startet i 1833 da Marcus Samuel sr. av verdens mest kjente merkevarer. Royal Dutch/ åpnet en liten forretning i Londons East End Shell som i dag er et multinasjonalt selskap med hvor han handlet med antikviteter, rariteter, hovedkontor i Haag og forretningsadresse i konkylier og dekorative skjell. Skjell og konkylier London, startet som en allianse i 1907. Da slo det var på moten i det viktorianske Storbritannia, og nederlandske Royal Dutch Petroleum Company forretningen var lukrativ.2 og britiske The «Shell» Transport and Trading Company seg sammen. Dette er historien om Den vokste til et blomstrende import- og hvordan Royal Dutch/Shell Group vokste seg eksportfirma, og Samuel organiserte en toveis til å bli et av verdens største foretak, men også handel mellom Storbritannia og det fjerne østen. om de to som startet det – den ene fra Londons Tekstiler og maskiner til å bygge opp en industri østkant, jødisk opprinnelse og ambisiøs. Den gikk fra Storbritannia, og i retur kom ris, kull, andre nederlender, med en hang for detaljer og silke, kobber og porselen. Antall handelspartnere tall. Mennene var Marcus Samuel jr.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Offshore Oil and Gas
    House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee UK offshore oil and gas First Report of Session 2008–09 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed date 17 June 2009 HC 341-II Published on date 30 June 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £16.50 The Committee Name The Energy and Climate Change Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Energy and Climate Change and associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Elliot Morley MP (Labour, Scunthorpe) (Chairman) Mr David Anderson MP (Labour, Blaydon) Colin Challen MP (Labour, Morley and Rothwell) Nadine Dorries MP (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Charles Hendry MP (Conservative, Wealden) Miss Julie Kirkbride MP (Conservative, Bromsgrove) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Judy Mallaber MP (Labour, Amber Valley) John Robertson MP (Labour, Glasgow North West) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrats, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Paddy Tipping MP (Labour, Sherwood) Dr Desmond Turner MP (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Mr Mike Weir MP (Scottish National Party, Angus) Dr Alan Whitehead MP (Labour, Southampton Test) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/ecc.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative History of Oil and Gas Markets and Prices: Is 2020 Just an Extreme Cyclical Event Or an Acceleration of the Energy Transition?
    April 2020 A Comparative History of Oil and Gas Markets and Prices: is 2020 just an extreme cyclical event or an acceleration of the energy transition? Introduction Natural gas markets have gone through an unprecedented transformation. Demand growth for this relatively clean, plentiful, versatile and now relatively cheap fuel has been increasing faster than for other fossil fuels.1 Historically a `poor relation’ of oil, gas is now taking centre stage. New markets, pricing mechanisms and benchmarks are being developed, and it is only natural to be curious about the direction these developments are taking. The oil industry has had a particularly rich and well recorded history, making it potentially useful for comparison. However, oil and gas are very different fuels and compete in different markets. Their paths of evolution will very much depend on what happens in the markets for energy sources with which they compete. Their history is rich with dominant companies, government intervention and cycles of boom and bust. A common denominator of virtually all energy industries is a tendency towards natural monopoly because they have characteristics that make such monopolies common. 2 Energy projects tend to require multibillion – often tens of billions of - investments with long gestation periods, with assets that can only be used for very specific purposes and usually, for very long-time periods. Natural monopolies are generally resolved either by new entrants breaking their integrated market structures or by government regulation. Historically, both have occurred in oil and gas markets.3 As we shall show, new entrants into the oil market in the 1960s led to increased supply at lower prices, and higher royalties, resulting in the collapse of control by the major oil companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices and Crisis – LNG and Australia's East Coast Gas Market
    March 2018 Prices and crisis: LNG and Australia’s East Coast gas market Introduction In 2017, a gas crisis emerged in Australia’s East Coast gas market. Gas prices had increased rapidly from mid-2016 as the full effect of the three LNG projects starting operations on Curtis Island worked through the gas market, putting domestic energy users under pressure. In March 2017, the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) forecast gas shortages in coming years, potentially leading to blackouts and industrial closures. While gas shortages are no longer forecast, challenges in the East Coast gas market remain. This paper examines recent events in Australia’s East Coast gas market, the challenges ahead, and the relevance of these developments for other countries.1 The paper identifies three phases in the East Coast gas market’s recent history. Firstly, between 2010 and mid-2016, prices in the East Coast gas market rose gradually, driven by LNG netbacks and the rising cost of gas production. Then, between mid-2016 and mid-2017, prices climbed above export parity levels, as gas that was previously being supplied to domestic consumers (both by LNG projects and by other producers) was diverted for export, leading to a deterioration in competition in the domestic market. Finally, as of mid-2017, prices appear to have stabilised around export parity levels,2 with LNG projects and other producers increasing gas sales to the domestic market. The episode of high prices during much of 2016 and 2017 highlights the impact that LNG projects can have on domestic gas prices on Australia’s East Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Removing Tax Preferences for U.S. Oil and Gas Production
    DISCUSSION PAPER The Impact of Removing Tax Preferences for U.S. Oil and Gas Production Gilbert E. Metcalf August 2016 The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and promi- nent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major international issues; sup- porting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce arti- cles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date infor- mation and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. government. All views expressed in its publications and on its website are the sole responsibility of the author or authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Return on Investment for Algal Biofuel
    Using TEA/LCA as a Design Tool: Results for a 100-ha Facility Corresponding Journal Article: Economically competitive algal biofuel production in a 100-ha facility: a comprehensive techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment C.M. Beal*, L.N. Gerber, D.L. Sills, M.E. Huntley, S. Machesky, J.W. Tester, I. Archibald, J. Granados, C.H. Greene Algal Research, In Review (Pre-prints Available) Cornell Marine Algal Biofuels Consortium 1 Cornell Marine Algal Biofuels Consortium (Funding: Shell 2007 - 2011, DOE/USDA 2011 - 2014) Strain Selection: Staurosira sp. (diatom) and Desmodesmus sp. (green) selected from >500 isolates for yield and settling 2 Cornell Marine Algal Biofuels Consortium (Funding: Shell 2007 - 2011, DOE/USDA 2011 - 2014) Strain Selection: Staurosira sp. (diatom) and Desmodesmus sp. (green) selected from >500 isolates for yield and settling Kona Demonstration Facility (Cellana LLC): 0.5-ha hybrid PBR-Pond cultivation yielded ~3 tons of biomass per month 3 Cornell Marine Algal Biofuels Consortium (Funding: Shell 2007 - 2011, DOE/USDA 2011 - 2014) Strain Selection: Staurosira sp. (diatom) and Desmodesmus sp. (green) selected from >500 isolates for yield and settling 20.0 40.0 Kona Demonstration Staurosira D) - Facility (Cellana LLC): 2 15.0 30.0 ) 0.5-ha hybrid PBR-Pond D - 2 cultivation yielded ~3 10.0 20.0 G/M tons of biomass per ( DW DW month 5.0 10.0 Production Results: (G/M PROTEIN OR LIPID PROTEIN LIPID DW 0.0 0.0 Described by Huntley et 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 al., Algal Research, In TOTAL NITROGEN Review Huntley M., et al., Actual large-scale production of marine microalgae4 for fuels and feed.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region
    Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region APEC Oil and Gas Security Studies | Series 17 APEC Energy Working Group September 2020 APEC Project: EWG 01 2020S Produced by Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Inui Building, Kachidoki 11F, 1-13-1 Kachidoki Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0054 Japan Tel: (813) 5144-8551 Fax: (813) 5144-8555 E-mail: [email protected] (administration) Website: http://aperc.or.jp/ For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2020 APEC Secretariat APEC#220-RE-01.9 ISBN: 978-981-14-7794-2 OGSS Series 17 Changing LNG Market Dynamics – Implications on Supply Security in the APEC Region 3 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 7 Project coordinators .................................................................................................................. 7 Authors ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Editors
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About Alberta's Oil Sands and Its Industry
    Facts about Alberta’s oil sands and its industry CONTENTS Oil Sands Discovery Centre Facts 1 Oil Sands Overview 3 Alberta’s Vast Resource The biggest known oil reserve in the world! 5 Geology Why does Alberta have oil sands? 7 Oil Sands 8 The Basics of Bitumen 10 Oil Sands Pioneers 12 Mighty Mining Machines 15 Cyrus the Bucketwheel Excavator 1303 20 Surface Mining Extraction 22 Upgrading 25 Pipelines 29 Environmental Protection 32 In situ Technology 36 Glossary 40 Oil Sands Projects in the Athabasca Oil Sands 44 Oil Sands Resources 48 OIL SANDS DISCOVERY CENTRE www.oilsandsdiscovery.com OIL SANDS DISCOVERY CENTRE FACTS Official Name Oil Sands Discovery Centre Vision Sharing the Oil Sands Experience Architects Wayne H. Wright Architects Ltd. Owner Government of Alberta Minister The Honourable Lindsay Blackett Minister of Culture and Community Spirit Location 7 hectares, at the corner of MacKenzie Boulevard and Highway 63 in Fort McMurray, Alberta Building Size Approximately 27,000 square feet, or 2,300 square metres Estimated Cost 9 million dollars Construction December 1983 – December 1984 Opening Date September 6, 1985 Updated Exhibit Gallery opened in September 2002 Facilities Dr. Karl A. Clark Exhibit Hall, administrative area, children’s activity/education centre, Robert Fitzsimmons Theatre, mini theatre, gift shop, meeting rooms, reference room, public washrooms, outdoor J. Howard Pew Industrial Equipment Garden, and Cyrus Bucketwheel Exhibit. Staffing Supervisor, Head of Marketing and Programs, Senior Interpreter, two full-time Interpreters, administrative support, receptionists/ cashiers, seasonal interpreters, and volunteers. Associated Projects Bitumount Historic Site Programs Oil Extraction demonstrations, Quest for Energy movie, Paydirt film, Historic Abasand Walking Tour (summer), special events, self-guided tours of the Exhibit Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • Close Brothers Group Plc Annual Report 2006
    (1,1) -1- 836858_cover.indd 2/10/06 3:32:35 pm Close Brothers Group plc Annual Report 2006 836858_cover.indd 1 22/10/06/10/06 33:32:35:32:35 ppmm (1,1) -2- 836858_cover.indd 2/10/06 3:32:16 pm 303 Close Brothers is an independent merchant bank and is amongst the top 200 listed companies in the UK. Our goal is to deliver consistent, long term growth in profi t and dividends. We strive to achieve this through our core strategy of specialisation and diversifi cation across a range of fi nancial services and, in particular, by: • focusing on higher margin activities • managing business risk whilst maintaining a healthy return on capital • attracting and supporting management teams of the highest calibre • fostering entrepreneurialism, independent thinking and a willingness to innovate • placing the highest importance on quality, professionalism and integrity in everything we do. 8836858_cover.indd36858_cover.indd 2 2/10/06 3:32:16 pm Close Brothers Group plc Annual Report 2006 1 Our Results at a Glance Profit £157m +21% Financial Highlights 2005 2006 Profit before goodwill and taxation £129m £157m +21% Earnings per share before goodwill 62.0p 74.1p +19% Profit before taxation £112m £157m +41% Earnings per share 49.8p 74.1p +49% Dividends per share 28.5p 32.5p +14% Shareholders’ funds £578m £662m +15% Total assets £4.8bn £4.8bn Operational Highlights • Asset Management profit up 21% to £38 million. FuM up 16% to £8.2 billion. • Corporate Finance record profit of £17 million. • Securities profit up 34% to £48 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioenergy 2016 Speaker Biographies
    Speaker Biographies (Arranged Alphabetically) Contents Keynote Speakers Austin Brown .................................................................................................................................. 7 Vann Bush ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Adam Cohen ................................................................................................................................... 9 The Honorable Chuck Fleischmann.............................................................................................. 10 David Friedman ............................................................................................................................ 11 Renato Domith Godinho ............................................................................................................... 12 The Honorable Marcy Kaptur ....................................................................................................... 13 Jan Koninckx ................................................................................................................................ 14 Jonathan Male ............................................................................................................................... 15 Dennis McGinn ............................................................................................................................. 16 Rueben Sarkar ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • S/1 Records of Hill Samuel & Company
    Lloyds TSB Group Archives: Catalogue S/1 Records of Hill Samuel & Company Level: Fonds S/1/a Establishment Level: Series S/1/a/1 Memorandum and articles of association of Hill 1969 Samuel and Company Level: Item S/1/a/2 Memorandum and articles of association of Hill 1969 Samuel Group. Includes copy of certificate of name change from Hill Samuel and Company to Hill Samuel Group Level: Item S/1/b Operation Level: Series S/1/b/1 Minutes of general meetings of Hill Samuel 1920-1978 Group (M.Samuel and Company until March1965; Hill Samuel and Company April 1965 - March 1969) (signed, indexed). Enclosed are papers relating to the proposed merger with Philip Hill, Higginson and Erlangers (1965). Level: Item S/1/b/2 Minutes of meetings of Board of Directors (M. 1965-1970 Samuel and Company record, January - March 1965; Hill Samuel and Company record, April 1965 - March 1969; Hill Samuel Group record, March 1969 - 1970) (indexed and signed). Level: Item S/1/b/3 Minutes of meetings of Board of Directors and 1970-1975 Committee of the Board of Directors (indexed, signed). Level: Item Lloyds TSB Group Archives: Catalogue S/1/b/4 Minutes of meetings of Board of Directors and 1975-1978 Committee of Board of Directors (indexed, signed). Level: Item S/1/b/5 Minutes of meetings of Board of Directors; 1979-1982 Committee of the Board of Directors; Group Chief Executive's Committee; Chairman's Committee; Emoluments Committee; Audit Committee; annual general meetings (indexed, signed). Level: Item S/1/b/6 Minutes of meetings of Committee of the Board 1983-1986 of Directors; Group Chief Executive's Committee; and Emoluments Committee (signed).
    [Show full text]