DOCSLIB.ORG

Inspection Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States Department of Agriculture GHALLBERG Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 351151434450161 insp_id Inspection Report Kellie Caron Raegan Royale Customer ID: 332765 Zoological Wildlife Conservation Center Certificate: 92-B-0256 74320 Larson Rd. Rainier, OR 97048 Site: 001 Kellie Caron & Raegan Royale Type: ROUTINE INSPECTION Date: Dec-02-2015 2.75 (b) (1) RECORDS: DEALERS AND EXHIBITORS. The notebook containing records of animals on hand is written in pencil. Records need to be indelible so they cannot readily be altered and so that they remain legible for as long as they are required to be maintained. Many entries are incomplete; they do not contain all the information required for the buyer and/or seller. It is unclear as to whether the contact information recorded is for who the animal came from or to whom it went. It is also unclear whether the "Out" date means that the animal was sold or it died. There is an APHIS Form 7020 recording the ownership transfer of two "canis lupus" pups which is dated 5/7/15. If these animals are wolf-dog crosses as stated by the licensee, they are considered dogs and use of the APHIS Form 7006 is required for this purpose. There is no official identification recorded for these animals, and none of the information for the five wolf-dog crosses is recorded on an APHIS Form 7005 as required in Section 2.75(a)(2). Maintaining accurate records is required of the licensee so that animals can be tracked to ensure legal and appropriate transfer of ownership. Correct within 60 days, by 2/1/2016. 2.131 (c) (1) HANDLING OF ANIMALS. Photos of animal encounters on the facility's website and FaceBook page show members of the public in contact with non-human primates (NHPs) with no restraints on the animals or barriers between the animals and the people. One photo shows two people in an enclosure with at least 4 ringtail lemurs. Another shows two people interacting with three NHPs, also with no restraints on the primates. These three NHPs appear to be a black and white colobus, a spider monkey, and a booted macaque. The set up of the main habitat where sloth encounters occur has no barriers between the animals and the public. This enclosure contained twelve animals at the time of inspection. A second encounter room, holding seven animals at the time of inspection, does have kennel-type enclosures containing the animals, but the doors are not secured to maintain separation when the attendants are not present to supervise. GWYNN HALLBERG, D V M Prepared By: GWYNN HALLBERG, D.V.M. USDA, APHIS, Animal Care Date: Title: VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER Inspector 5036 Dec-18-2015 Received By: KELLIE CARON,(b)(6), VIA (b)(7)(c)EMAIL Date: Title: LICENSEE Dec-10-2015 Page 1 of 3 United States Department of Agriculture GHALLBERG Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 351151434450161 insp_id Inspection Report Exhibiting the animals without proper distance or barriers exposes both the animals and the public to potential for injury and/or disease transmission. NHPs and people share susceptibility to some of the same diseases. Further, all macaques are susceptible to and can carry Herpes B virus, which is a minor problem for the animal, but can cause a fatal encephalitis in people. Members of the general public do not have the training or experience to be in safe contact with these animals. These interactions could result in harm to either humans or animals, or both. Correct by exhibiting animals with appropriate distance and/or barriers at all times to protect both the humans and the animals. Note: The wolf (versus wolf-dog) encounter situation is under review. 2.131 (d) (2) HANDLING OF ANIMALS. In a discussion regarding the "Sleep With a Sloth" program, where members of the public pay to spend the night within a sloth enclosure, it was revealed that there is not an attendant present at all times while the participants are in the enclosures. The licensee stated that attendants check in every hour or so. Members of the general public do not have the training or experience to be in contact with these animals.These kinds of unsupervised interactions could result in harm to either humans or animals, or both. Correct by having appropriately trained and experienced attendants present at all times during public exhibition. 3.126 (b) FACILITIES, INDOOR. The room in which the two binturongs and one tamandua are held has a very strong odor. Both species normally have a strong scent, but this odor was due to urine and feces. There is no window or exhaust fan in use to improve air quality. Poor air quality can predispose the animals to illness, especially respiratory infections. Poor air quality is corrected by more frequent cleaning, by increasing ventilation, or both. Correct within 30 days, by 1/1/2016. 3.131 (a) SANITATION. The floor of the enclosure holding two binturongs is damaged along the edge near the center divider. The impermeable surface layer has been torn up, exposing the permeable subsurface. That subsurface cannot be cleaned and sanitized adequately. GWYNN HALLBERG, D V M Prepared By: GWYNN HALLBERG, D.V.M. USDA, APHIS, Animal Care Date: Title: VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER Inspector 5036 Dec-18-2015 Received By: KELLIE CARON,(b)(6), VIA (b)(7)(c)EMAIL Date: Title: LICENSEE Dec-10-2015 Page 2 of 3 United States Department of Agriculture GHALLBERG Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 351151434450161 insp_id Inspection Report Inability to clean and sanitize adequately can allow disease-causing organisms to grow, and also contributes to the odor in the room. Surfaces must be maintained in good repair to ensure adequate cleaning is possible. Correct within 30 days, by 1/1/2016. The inspection and the exit briefing was conducted with a licensee. IES Investigator Sue Orham was present at this inspection. GWYNN HALLBERG, D V M Prepared By: GWYNN HALLBERG, D.V.M. USDA, APHIS, Animal Care Date: Title: VETERINARY MEDICAL OFFICER Inspector 5036 Dec-18-2015 Received By: KELLIE CARON,(b)(6), VIA (b)(7)(c)EMAIL Date: Title: LICENSEE Dec-10-2015 Page 3 of 3 United States Department of Agriculture Customer: 332765 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Inspection Date: 02-DEC-15 Animal Inspected at Last Inspection Cust No Cert No Site Site Name Inspection 332765 92-B-0256 001 KELLIE CARON 02-DEC-15 RAEGAN ROYALE Count Species 000005 Dog Adult 000001 Caracal 000002 Northern/Eurasian lynx 000000 Black-and-red tamarin 000002 Cotton-top tamarin 000000 Common palm civet 000000 Burrowing rat-kangaroo 000000 Fishing cat 000004 Black-and-red howler 000001 Brown-headed spider monkey 000000 Black-handed spider monkey 000000 Golden-headed tamarin 000000 Dog Puppy 000003 Eastern black and white colobus 000002 Sloth bear 000001 Egyptian fruit bat 000001 Southern tamandua 000001 Serval 000000 Snow leopard 000000 Red-handed tamarin 000001 Bobcat 000003 Ruffed lemur 000001 Booted macaque *Male 000026 Linnes two-toed sloth 000001 Mountain brush-tail possum 000000 Pale fox 000002 Binturong 000011 Ring-tailed lemur 000004 Night Monkey 000072 Total.
Recommended publications
  • Canid, Hye A, Aardwolf Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (Camp) Canid, Hyena, & Aardwolf

    Canid, Hye A, Aardwolf Conservation Assessment and Management Plan (Camp) Canid, Hyena, & Aardwolf

    CANID, HYE A, AARDWOLF CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (CAMP) CANID, HYENA, & AARDWOLF CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (CAMP) Final Draft Report Edited by Jack Grisham, Alan West, Onnie Byers and Ulysses Seal ~ Canid Specialist Group EARlliPROMSE FOSSIL RIM A fi>MlY Of CCNSERVA11QN FUNDS A Joint Endeavor of AAZPA IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group IUCN/SSC Hyaena Specialist Group IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group CBSG SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION The work of the Captive Breeding Specialist Group is made possible by gellerous colltributiolls from the following members of the CBSG Institutional Conservation Council: Conservators ($10,000 and above) Federation of Zoological Gardens of Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Claws 'n Paws Australasian Species Management Program Great Britain and Ireland BanhamZoo Darmstadt Zoo Chicago Zoological Society Fort Wayne Zoological Society Copenhagen Zoo Dreher Park Zoo Columbus Zoological Gardens Gladys Porter Zoo Cotswold Wildlife Park Fota Wildlife Park Denver Zoological Gardens Indianapolis Zoological Society Dutch Federation of Zoological Gardens Great Plains Zoo Fossil Rim Wildlife Center Japanese Association of Zoological Parks Erie Zoological Park Hancock House Publisher Friends of Zoo Atlanta and Aquariums Fota Wildlife Park Kew Royal Botanic Gardens Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust Givskud Zoo Miller Park Zoo International Union of Directors of Lincoln Park Zoo Granby Zoological Society Nagoya Aquarium Zoological Gardens The Living Desert Knoxville Zoo National Audubon Society-Research Metropolitan Toronto Zoo Marwell Zoological Park National Geographic Magazine Ranch Sanctuary Minnesota Zoological Garden Milwaukee County Zoo National Zoological Gardens National Aviary in Pittsburgh New York Zoological Society NOAHS Center of South Africa Parco Faunistico "La To:rbiera" Omaha's Henry Doorly Zoo North of Chester Zoological Society Odense Zoo Potter Park Zoo Saint Louis Zoo Oklahoma City Zoo Orana Park Wildlife Trust Racine Zoological Society Sea World, Inc.
  • Vulpes Vulpes) Evolved Throughout History?

    Vulpes Vulpes) Evolved Throughout History?

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses Environmental Studies Program 2020 TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY? Abigail Misfeldt University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses Part of the Environmental Education Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Disclaimer: The following thesis was produced in the Environmental Studies Program as a student senior capstone project. Misfeldt, Abigail, "TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY?" (2020). Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses. 283. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses/283 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY? By Abigail Misfeldt A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The University of Nebraska-Lincoln In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Science Major: Environmental Studies Under the Supervision of Dr. David Gosselin Lincoln, Nebraska November 2020 Abstract Red foxes are one of the few creatures able to adapt to living alongside humans as we have evolved. All humans and wildlife have some id of relationship, be it a friendly one or one of mutual hatred, or simply a neutral one. Through a systematic research review of legends, books, and journal articles, I mapped how humans and foxes have evolved together.
  • Observations of Pale and Rüppell's Fox from the Afar Desert

    Observations of Pale and Rüppell's Fox from the Afar Desert

    Dinets et al. Pale and Rüppell’s fox in Ethiopia Copyright © 2015 by the IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group. ISSN 1478-2677 Research report Observations of pale and Rüppell’s fox from the Afar Desert, Ethiopia Vladimir Dinets1*, Matthias De Beenhouwer2 and Jon Hall3 1 Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA. Email: [email protected] 2 Biology Department, University of Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31-2435, BE-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. 3 www.mammalwatching.com, 450 West 42nd St., New York, New York 10036, USA. * Correspondence author Keywords: Africa, Canidae, distribution, Vulpes pallida, Vulpes rueppellii. Abstract Multiple sight records of pale and Rüppell’s foxes from northwestern and southern areas of the Afar De- sert in Ethiopia extend the ranges of both species in the region. We report these sightings and discuss their possible implications for the species’ biogeography. Introduction 2013 during a mammalogical expedition. Foxes were found opportu- nistically during travel on foot or by vehicle, as specified below. All coordinates and elevations were determined post hoc from Google The Afar Desert (hereafter Afar), alternatively known as the Afar Tri- Earth. Distances were estimated visually. angle, Danakil Depression, or Danakil Desert, is a large arid area span- ning Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti and Somaliland (Mengisteab 2013). Its fauna remains poorly known, as exemplified by the fact that the first Results possible record of Canis lupus dates back only to 2004 (Tiwari and Sillero-Zubiri 2004; note that the identification in this case is still On 14 May 2007, JH saw a fox in degraded desert near the town of uncertain).
  • Reptile and Amphibian Enforcement Applicable Law Sections

    Reptile and Amphibian Enforcement Applicable Law Sections

    Reptile and Amphibian Enforcement Applicable Law Sections Environmental Conservation Law 11-0103. Definitions. As used in the Fish and Wildlife Law: 1. a. "Fish" means all varieties of the super-class Pisces. b. "Food fish" means all species of edible fish and squid (cephalopoda). c. "Migratory fish of the sea" means both catadromous and anadromous species of fish which live a part of their life span in salt water streams and oceans. d. "Fish protected by law" means fish protected, by law or by regulations of the department, by restrictions on open seasons or on size of fish that may be taken. e. Unless otherwise indicated, "Trout" includes brook trout, brown trout, red-throat trout, rainbow trout and splake. "Trout", "landlocked salmon", "black bass", "pickerel", "pike", and "walleye" mean respectively, the fish or groups of fish identified by those names, with or without one or more other common names of fish belonging to the group. "Pacific salmon" means coho salmon, chinook salmon and pink salmon. 2. "Game" is classified as (a) game birds; (b) big game; (c) small game. a. "Game birds" are classified as (1) migratory game birds and (2) upland game birds. (1) "Migratory game birds" means the Anatidae or waterfowl, commonly known as geese, brant, swans and river and sea ducks; the Rallidae, commonly known as rails, American coots, mud hens and gallinules; the Limicolae or shorebirds, commonly known as woodcock, snipe, plover, surfbirds, sandpipers, tattlers and curlews; the Corvidae, commonly known as jays, crows and magpies. (2) "Upland game birds" (Gallinae) means wild turkeys, grouse, pheasant, Hungarian or European gray-legged partridge and quail.
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Carnívoros 2019 2ª Ed

    Os Nomes Galegos Dos Carnívoros 2019 2ª Ed

    Os nomes galegos dos carnívoros 2019 2ª ed. Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (20192): Os nomes galegos dos carnívoros. Xinzo de Limia (Ourense): A Chave. https://www.achave.ga"/wp#content/up"oads/achave_osnomes!a"egosdos$carnivoros$2019.pd% Fotografía: lince euroasiático (Lynx lynx ). Autor: Jordi Bas. &sta o'ra est( su)eita a unha licenza Creative Commons de uso a'erto* con reco+ecemento da autor,a e sen o'ra derivada nin usos comerciais. -esumo da licenza: https://creativecommons.or!/"icences/'.#n #nd//.0/deed.!". Licenza comp"eta: https://creativecommons.or!/"icences/'.#n #nd//.0/"e!a"code0"an!ua!es. 1 Notas introdutorias O que cont n este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións galegas para diferentes especies de mamíferos carnívoros. Primeira edición (2018): En total! ac"éganse nomes para 2#$ especies! %&ue son practicamente todos os carnívoros &ue "ai no mundo! salvante os nomes das focas% e $0 subespecies. Os nomes galegos das focas expóñense noutro recurso léxico da +"ave dedicado só aos nomes das focas! manatís e dugongos. ,egunda edición (201-): +orríxese algunha gralla! reescrí'ense as notas introdutorias e incorpórase o logo da +"ave ao deseño do documento. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase a clasificación taxonómica das familias de mamíferos carnívoros! onde se apunta! de maneira xeral! os nomes dos carnívoros &ue "ai en cada familia. seguir vén o corpo do documento! unha listaxe onde se indica! especie por especie, alén do nome científico! os nomes galegos e ingleses dos diferentes mamíferos carnívoros (nalgún caso! tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles ou o nome particular dalgunhas subespecies).
  • Imagine Substituting Leptons and Quarks for Gods and Spirits1 D P Veldsman (University of South Africa)

    Imagine Substituting Leptons and Quarks for Gods and Spirits1 D P Veldsman (University of South Africa)

    Imagine substituting leptons and quarks for gods and spirits1 D P Veldsman (University of South Africa) ABSTRACT Imagine substituting leptons and quarks for gods and spirits Guided by the conviction that an exhaustive exploration of features common to modern Western and traditional African thought should come before the enumeration of differences, it is argued that the general propositions that can be formulated on the nature and function of Western traditional thinking are highly relevant to traditional African thinking. Despite the fact that African worldview reflections are mostly in terms of the world of which “we are part", and not the world where “we are inside”, which is common to Western reflection, a surprisingly fundamental similarity exists in the type of conceptuality employed as well as in the process o f theory making. This very similarity is put forward as a comparison of features common to Western and traditional African thought. From this comparative story of the theory making processes, the stage is set for addressing the pedagogical challenges within the Southern African multicultural context from which a new perspective can be explored, and a tentative framework be construed for a curriculum which can bridge the apparent irreconcilable differences. Ever thought for a minute to imaginatively substitute leptons and quarks for gods and spirits? A ludicrous suggestion? Stated differ­ ently: Why believe in leptons and quarks when no fractionally charged particle has ever unequivocally been observed in an experiment? Then why not in gods and spirits? Is it simply because the acknowledgement of the existence of leptons and quarks does not touch or threaten us in our own being, whereas belief in gods and spirits has consequences for all we hope for and do? Does it matter? Addressing the pedagogical challenges within the Southern African multicultural context resulting from the apparent irreconcilable differences between the fine- ^uned Western cosmology and African cosmogonies.
  • Senegal, 2017

    Senegal, 2017

    By Morten Heegaard, Stig Jensen and Jon Lehmberg. For the last decade or so Senegal has been high on our list of “countries-to-visit”, the main reason for that being the impressive number of birds of prey gathering at Ile de Kousmar during the winter months. Thousands of Lesser Kestrels and African Scissor-tailed Kites can be counted at their night roost here, and it’s an amazing spectacle seeing the birds flying in to the island late in the afternoon. However, the raptors were by no means the only avian highlight of our trip, and a much more detailed report covering those can be found on Cloudbirders: https://www.cloudbirders.com/tripreport/show/20842/31115 While Senegal is a very interesting destination for birdwatchers, the number of mammals doesn’t really compare well to what you can see in many East and South African countries. In much of West Africa heavy hunting pressure and a loss of habitat has wiped out populations of many of the big mammals, though some can still be found in a few places. South-east Senegal is one such place where mega-fauna like Leopards, Lions, Wild Dogs and Elephants probably still hold on with the skin of their teeth, and Niokolo-Koba NP is therefore an extremely important area if the westernmost population of a number of species are to be saved. There’s absolutely no doubt that this national park is the prime mammal watching area in Senegal. Further south around Dindefelo there’s even still a chance of seeing Chimpanzees, and immediately to the East, the little-known reserve RNC Boundou is probably also still home to some of the big mammals, and certainly to Serval which was seen here recently.
  • Longevity Survey

    Longevity Survey

    LONGEVITY SURVEY LENGTH OF LIFE OF MAMMALS IN CAPTIVITY AT THE LONDON ZOO AND WHIPSNADE PARK The figures given in the following tables are based on the records of the Zoological Society of London for the years 1930 to 1960. The number of specimens in each sample is given in the first column. The percentage of the sample that died in less than a year at the zoo is iven in second column. In this way ‘delicate’ zoo species can be noted at a glance. An average fife span of all those individuals living for more than a year at the zoo is given (in months) in the third column. In the fourth column the maximum individual life-span is noted for each species. It must be emphasized that the age of specimens arriving at the zoo is seldom known accur- ately and no allowance has been made for this. All figures refer to the period of time between arrival at the zoo and death at the zoo. Actual life-spans will, therefore, usually be longer than those given. Number o % dead in Average age Ma.life individual less than (in nronths) span in sample 12 month of those (in months) livi 12 man% or longer ORDER MONOTREMATA Tachyglossus aculeatirs Echidna 7 I00 10 Zuglossus bruijni Druijns Echidna 2 - 368 ORDER MARSUPIALIA Caluromys philander Philander Opossum 3 - 50 Philander opossum Quica Opossum I - 1s Lutreolina crussicaudufa Thick-tailed Opossum 6 50 1s Metachirus nudicuudatirs Rat-tailed Opossum 14 71 27 Didelphis marsupialis Virginian Opossum 34 82 26 Didelphis azarae Azara’s Opossuni IS 53 48 Dmyurus uiuerrinus Little Native Cat 2 I00 I1 Dasyurus maculatus
  • Report of the Presence of Wild Animals

    Report of the Presence of Wild Animals

    Report of the Presence of Wild Animals The information recorded here is essential to emergency services personnel so that they may protect themselves and your neighbors, provide for the safety of your animals, ensure the maximum protection and preservation of your property, and provide you with emergency services without unnecessary delay. Every person in New York State, who owns, possesses, or harbors a wild animal, as set forth in General Municipal Law §209-cc, must file this Report annually, on or before April 1, of each year, with the clerk of the city, village or town (if outside a village) where the animal is kept. A list of the common names of animals to be reported is enclosed with this form. Failure to file as required will subject you to penalties under law. A separate Report is required to be filed annually for each address where a wild animal is harbored. Exemptions: Pet dealers, as defined in section 752-a of the General Business Law, zoological facilities and other exhibitors licensed pursuant to U.S. Code Title 7 Chapter 54 Sections 2132, 2133 and 2134, and licensed veterinarians in temporary possession of dangerous dogs, are not required to file this report. Instructions for completing this form: 1. Please print or type all information, using blue or black ink. 2. Fill in the information requested on this page. 3. On the continuation sheets, fill in the information requested for each type of animal that you possess. 4. Return the completed forms to the city, town, or village clerk of each municipality where the animal or animals are owned, possessed or harbored.
  • Ethiopia, 2009

    Ethiopia, 2009

    Ethiopia trip report, February-March and May 2009 VLADIMIR DINETS (written in February 2016) For a mammalwatcher, Ethiopia is one of the most interesting countries in the world: it has very high mammalian diversity and lots of endemics. It is also poorly explored, with new species of small mammals described every year and new large mammals still discovered occasionally. This means that there is always a chance that you’ll find something new, but it also means that identifying what you see can be very difficult or impossible. I think all larger mammals and bats mentioned below were identified correctly, but I’m still unsure about some shrews and particularly rodents. There are also numerous unsettled taxonomic issues with Ethiopian mammals; I tried to update the taxonomy as well as I could. Travel in Ethiopia isn’t easy or cheap, but it’s totally worth the trouble, and the intensity of cultural experience is unparalleled, although many visitors find it to be a bit too much. The country is catastrophically overpopulated, particularly the fertile highlands. Parks and reserves range from existing only on paper to being relatively well protected, but all of them generate very little income and are deeply hated by the local population; armed conflicts over grazing restrictions are common. I’ve been in Ethiopia three times. In 2005 I got stuck there for a few days due to an airport closure, but had no money at all, couldn’t get out of Addis Ababa, and saw only one bat. In 2009 I went there to study crocodile behavior, spent a few days in Addis arranging special-use permits for national parks, hired a car, traveled to Omo Delta at the northern tip of Lake Turkana, survived ten days of studying crocodiles there, and went to Moyale to meet my volunteers Alexander Bernstein and Sarit Reizin who were coming from Kenya.
  • Global ICAP Workshop for Canids and Hyaenids Final Report.Pdf

    Global ICAP Workshop for Canids and Hyaenids Final Report.Pdf

    Global Integrated Collection Assessment and Planning Workshop for Canids and Hyaenids Omaha, NE, US, 19 – 20 March 2016 Final Report Workshop organized by: AZA Canid and Hyaenid Taxon Advisory Group; EAZA Canid and Hyaenid Taxon Advisory Group; ZAA Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group; IUCN SSC Canid Specialist Group; IUCN SSC Hyaenid Specialist Group; and the IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group (CPSG). Workshop financial support provided by: Saint Louis Zoo and a private donation Photo credits (front cover, left to right): Row 1: African wild dog (Yorkshire Wildlife Park); Swift fox (M. Sovada); Darwin fox education (M. Zordan); Fennec fox research (Fitbit; R. Meibaum); Row 2: Culpeo fox (Zoologico Nacional – Parque Metropolitano de Santiago, Chile); spotted hyena (Colchester Zoo); bush dog (M. Jacob); maned wolf (Temaiken Foundation); Row 3: Dhole (B. Gupta); Mexican wolf (J. Fallon); striped hyena (T. Rehse); black‐backed jackal (Amersfoort Zoo) A contribution of the IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialist Group IUCN encourages meetings, workshops and other fora for the consideration and analysis of issues related to conservation, and believes that reports of these meetings are most useful when broadly disseminated. The opinions and views expressed by the authors may not necessarily reflect the formal policies of IUCN, its Commissions, its Secretariat or its members. The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © Copyright CPSG 2018 Traylor‐Holzer, K., K.
  • Canids of the World Wolves, Wild Dogs, Foxes

    Canids of the World Wolves, Wild Dogs, Foxes

    INTRODUCTION © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. RECOGNITION The Canid family is a lineage of terrestrial carnivorans, adapted for swift running, which includes Wolves, Coyotes, Jackals, Foxes, Dogs, Dingoes, Dholes and other Dog-like mammals, with a total of 13 genera and at least 37 extant species. They are mostly social animals, living together in family units or small groups and behaving cooperatively. Most are seasonal breeders producing a single litter each year. They exhibit many reproductive and behavioral traits uncommon in other mammals, such as monogamy with paternal care, long-term incorporation of young adults into the social group, alloparenting, inhibition of reproduction in subordinate individuals, monoestrus, and a copulatory tie. They inhabit temperate and tropical forests, savanna, tundra and deserts throughout the world, with the exception of some oceanic islands and Antarctica. Most Canids feed on mammalian prey, but vegetable matter, carrion, and invertebrates are also an important source of food in many species. Size and body shape (fig. 1): Canids vary widely in size, from the Gray Wolf, which may be up to 160 cm long, and can weigh up to 80 kg, to the diminutive Fennec Fox, which may be as little as 24 cm in length, and weighs less than 1 kg. Most Fox species weigh 1.5 to 9.0 kg, while most other species are 5 to 27 kg. Body lengths (without tail) range between 35 and 160 cm, and tail lengths are approximately 12 to 56 cm.