CSG Journal 2019-2020Rev7-Woodcroft.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CSG Bibliog 24
CASTLE STUDIES: RECENT PUBLICATIONS – 29 (2016) By Dr Gillian Scott with the assistance of Dr John R. Kenyon Introduction Hello and welcome to the latest edition of the CSG annual bibliography, this year containing over 150 references to keep us all busy. I must apologise for the delay in getting the bibliography to members. This volume covers publications up to mid- August of this year and is for the most part written as if to be published last year. Next year’s bibliography (No.30 2017) is already up and running. I seem to have come across several papers this year that could be viewed as on the periphery of our area of interest. For example the papers in the latest Ulster Journal of Archaeology on the forts of the Nine Years War, the various papers in the special edition of Architectural Heritage and Eric Johnson’s paper on moated sites in Medieval Archaeology. I have listed most of these even if inclusion stretches the definition of ‘Castle’ somewhat. It’s a hard thing to define anyway and I’m sure most of you will be interested in these papers. I apologise if you find my decisions regarding inclusion and non-inclusion a bit haphazard, particularly when it comes to the 17th century and so-called ‘Palace’ and ‘Fort’ sites. If these are your particular area of interest you might think that I have missed some items. If so, do let me know. In a similar vein I was contacted this year by Bruce Coplestone-Crow regarding several of his papers over the last few years that haven’t been included in the bibliography. -
Sheriff Hutton
CSG Annual Conference - April 2017 - Sheriff Hutton Sheriff Hutton. The South-East corner of the Inner Court viewed from the Middle Court. Entrance and SE Tower, perhaps associated with or accommodating the chapel. THE CASTLE STUDIES GROUP JOURNAL THENO 29: CASTLE 2015-1671 STUDIES GROUP JOURNAL NO 31: 2017-18 CSG Annual Conference - April 2017 - Sheriff Hutton ABOVE: Aerial view of Sheriff Hutton from the west. Neville’s lodgings and chambers are in the rectangular corner tower in the lower right hand corner. Photo taken in July 1951 prior to recent housing developments. (CUCAP GU82) BELOW: Pre-1887 photograph showing the view from the south from the park to the castle across the double ditch. The SW tower to the left hand corner. Taken from Dennison 2005, 133 - original photograph is in the Tony Wright collection. THE CASTLE STUDIES GROUP JOURNAL THENO 29: CASTLE 2015-1672 STUDIES GROUP JOURNAL NO 31: 2017-18 CSG Annual Conference - April 2017 - Sheriff Hutton Sheriff Hutton: ABOVE: Measured earthwork survey taken from Dennison (2005, 124). BELOW: Schematic reconstruction taken from Dennison (2005) THE CASTLE STUDIES GROUP JOURNAL THENO 29: CASTLE 2015-1673 STUDIES GROUP JOURNAL NO 31: 2017-18 CSG Annual Conference - April 2017 - Sheriff Hutton Sheriff Hutton Council of the North and becoming home for the titular President of the Council and his In 1534 John Leland wrote of Sheriff Hutton "I bona fide advisors. saw no house in the north so like a princely logginges" although Leland, writing for Henry In 1537, shortly after John Leland’s visit Hen- VIII, knew this was the home of Henry FitzRoy, ry FitzRoy died and the Council of the North the king’s natural son. -
A Reappraisal of the Date, Architectural Context and Significance of the Great Tower of Dudley Castle Hislop, Malcolm
University of Birmingham A missing link: a reappraisal of the date, architectural context and significance of the great tower of Dudley Castle Hislop, Malcolm DOI: 10.1017/S000358150999045X Citation for published version (Harvard): Hislop, M 2010, 'A missing link: a reappraisal of the date, architectural context and significance of the great tower of Dudley Castle', The Antiquaries Journal, vol. 90, pp. 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000358150999045X Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive. -
Pre-1500 Military Sites Scheduling Selection Guide Summary
Pre-1500 Military Sites Scheduling Selection Guide Summary Historic England’s scheduling selection guides help to define which archaeological sites are likely to meet the relevant tests for national designation and be included on the National Heritage List for England. For archaeological sites and monuments, they are divided into categories ranging from Agriculture to Utilities and complement the listing selection guides for buildings. Scheduling is applied only to sites of national importance, and even then only if it is the best means of protection. Only deliberately created structures, features and remains can be scheduled. The scheduling selection guides are supplemented by the Introductions to Heritage Assets which provide more detailed considerations of specific archaeological sites and monuments. This selection guide offers an overview of archaeological monuments or sites designed to have a military function and likely to be deemed to have national importance, and sets out criteria to establish for which of those scheduling may be appropriate. The guide aims to do two things: to set these sites within their historical context, and to give an introduction to some of the overarching and more specific designation considerations. This document has been prepared by Listing Group. It is one is of a series of 18 documents. This edition published by Historic England July 2018. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. Please refer to this document as: Historic England 2018 Pre-1500 Military Sites: Scheduling Selection Guide. Swindon. Historic England. HistoricEngland.org.uk/listing/selection-criteria/scheduling-selection/ Front cover The castle at Burton-in-Lonsdale, North Yorkshire was built around 1100 as a ringwork; later it was reconstructed as a motte with two baileys. -
Goodrich Castle
CSG Annual Conference - Hereford - April 2016 - Goodrich Castle Goodrich Castle, from the south-east. R-L: SE Tower, south curtain which bows out at the centre, with Keep behind; SW Tower with storey division roll mouldings, all above the rock-cut ditch. Goodrich Castle of Gloucester and Hereford were disputing the area. At this time Goodrich belonged to Gilbert The majestic stone ruins of Goodrich Castle Fitz Gilbert de Clare, although it remains un- rise dramatically from the sandstone bedrock clear how he acquired the lordship and castle. of a promontory overlooking a crossing point It returned to royal ownership in 1176. on the River Wye. The late 13th /early 14th century quadrangular castle encloses an earlier In 1204 King John gave Goodrich to William Norman tower keep and has an L-shaped outer Marshal, who was probably responsible for the ward on its north and west sides. It has a sub- construction of the first stone curtain wall and stantial dry moat, now grassed, on the south towers around the keep, a common undertaking and east sides, and the drawbridge and gate- of Marcher Lords along the Welsh border at house are defended by an outwork, or barbican. that time. Under the ownership of William de The first documentary reference to the castle Valence sometime later, grants of oak trees and dates to c. 1100 and connects it with a local the local presence of royal clerks and workmen landowner, Godric Mapston. At this time the recorded in the 1260s and 1280s-90s suggest castle was probably a simple enclosure with that substantial rebuilding was taking place and timber palisade and tower, although any evi- the majority of the present structure dates from dence for this has been obscured by subsequent this period. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2019, North East And
North East & Yorkshire Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 131 Content and criteria III York (UA) 133 Key Statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 25 Tees Valley 31 Darlington (UA) 31 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 46 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 61 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 62 Harrogate 65 North York Moors (NP) 68 Richmondshire 75 Ryedale 78 Scarborough 90 Selby 93 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 96 South Yorkshire 100 Barnsley 100 Doncaster 102 Peak District (NP) 105 Rotherham 106 Sheffield 108 West Yorkshire 112 Bradford 112 Calderdale 116 Kirklees 121 Leeds 126 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good. -
An August Encounter
....... s Richard III Society, Inc. Volume XXXVI No. 1&2 Spring & Summer, 2006 An August Encounter An unlikely meeting, (more symbolic than historically factual) is the subject for this appropriate “Bosworth” month window display of a pair of intricately-painted heraldic jousting model figures, depicting Henry Tudor and Richard III: “The Armoury of St. James’s,” 17 Piccadilly Arcade, London SW1Y6NH (www.armoury.co.uk/home - these pewter mounted knights range from £800 - £1,000!) — Geoffrey Wheeler REGISTER STAFF EDITOR: Carole M. Rike 48299 Stafford Road • Tickfaw, LA 70466 985-350-6101 ° 504-952-4984 (cell) email: [email protected] ©2006 Richard III Society, Inc., American Branch. No part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means — mechanical, RICARDIAN READING EDITOR: Myrna Smith electrical or photocopying, recording or information storage retrieval — 2784 Avenue G • Ingleside, TX 78362 without written permission from the Society. Articles submitted by (361) 332-9363 • email: [email protected] members remain the property of the author. The Ricardian Register is published four times per year. Subscriptions are available at $20.00 annually. ARTIST: Susan Dexter 1510 Delaware Avenue • New Castle, PA 16105-2674 In the belief that many features of the traditional accounts of the character and career of Richard III are neither supported by sufficient CROSSWORD: Charlie Jordan evidence nor reasonably tenable, the Society aims to promote in every [email protected] possible way research into the life and times of Richard III, and to secure a re-assessment of the material relating to the period, and of the role in English history of this monarch The Richard III Society is a nonprofit, educational corporation. -
A1 Birtley to Coal House Scheme Number: TR010031
A1 Birtley to Coal House Scheme Number: TR010031 6.3 Environmental Statement – Appendix 6.1 Historic Environment Desk Based Assessment APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 6 August 2019 A1 Birtley to Coal House Environmental Statement Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedures) Regulations 2009 A1 Birtley to Coal House Development Consent Order 20[xx] Environmental Statement - Appendix Regulation Reference: APFP Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010031 Reference Application Document Reference TR010031/APP/6.3 Author: A1 Birtley to Coal House Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 0 14 August 2019 Application Issue Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010031 Application Document Ref: TR010031/APP/6.3 A1 Birtley to Coal House Environmental Statement Appendix 6.1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PROJECT 1 1.2. LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY 1 2. POLICY, APPROACH AND GUIDANCE 2 2.1. PLANNING BACKGROUND AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK 2 2.2. APPROACH 5 3. ASSESSMENT PROCESS 7 3.1. DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT 7 3.2. OUTLINE METHOD STATEMENT 7 4. BASELINE CONDITION 9 4.1. DATA COLLECTION 9 4.2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 9 4.3. ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS 19 4.4. MAP ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY AREAS 19 5. GAZETTEER OF HERITAGE ASSETS 24 6. IMPORTANCE OR SENSITIVITY 31 7. SETTING ASSESSMENT 35 7.1. METHODOLOGY 35 7.2. APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT 38 7.3. HISTORIC LANDSCAPE CHARACTER 38 7.4. THE ATTRIBUTES OF THE SCHEME 39 7.5. -
Bodiam Castle Robertsbridge East Sussex
BODIAM CASTLE ROBERTSBRIDGE EAST SUSSEX CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN for THE NATIONAL TRUST Drury McPherson Partnership Historic environment policy and practice Part 1: UNDERSTANDING AND SIGNIFICANCE June 2016 Bodiam Castle Conservation Management Plan Drury McPherson Partnership 23 Spencer Road Strawberry Hill TWICKENHAM TW2 5TZ Tel: +44 (0)20 8894 6247 Email: [email protected] June 2016 2 Bodiam Castle Conservation Management Plan Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 11 1.1 The purpose of the conservation plan ...................................................... 11 1.2 The structure of the plan ............................................................................. 11 1.3 Sources and abbreviations ........................................................................... 13 1.4 Spellings ......................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................... 14 2 UNDERSTANDING .......................................................................................... 16 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 16 Location .................................................................................................................. 16 Geology and topography ..................................................................................... -
CAPABILITY STATEMENT Heritage
CAPABILITY STATEMENT Heritage patrickparsons.co.uk Patrick Parsons enhance the built and natural environment by applying our expertise with purpose, personality and pride. patrickparsons.co.uk patrickparsons.co.uk Background For over 50 years, the Patrick Parsons have been building the expertise and reputation to deliver exceptional engineering solutions. Spanning specialisms from the restoration of historic structures to the design of multimillion pound state-of-the-art residential schemes in central London, we offer one of the most comprehensive skill sets in the industry. The firm was established in the UK in 1964 and has now developed into an international multi-disciplinary consultancy with staff in offices across the globe. Our unique range of integrated engineering services together with our highly qualified, experienced staff allow us to compete with major international companies yet we still offer the personal service that you would expect from a smaller firm. We believe in developing long term relationships with our clients. Delivering a flexible, professional and friendly service is instrumental to the success of Patrick Parsons and the company continues to set itself apart from its competitors by ensuring that all projects are led by one of the company’s highly experienced directors. Our vision is to be the multi-disciplinary consultant of choice; creating inspiring spaces to live, work and have fun, where everyone involved can proudly say “I played a part in that”. We are proud to have worked on a huge number of successful, high-value projects. The following pages demonstrate just some of the work we have successfully delivered for our clients. -
Heritage at Risk Register 2020, North East and Yorkshire
North East & Yorkshire Register 2020 HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 130 Content and criteria III York (UA) 132 Key statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 26 Tees Valley 32 Darlington (UA) 32 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 45 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 60 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 61 Harrogate 64 North York Moors (NP) 67 Richmondshire 74 Ryedale 77 Scarborough 89 Selby 91 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 95 South Yorkshire 98 Barnsley 98 Doncaster 100 Peak District (NP) 104 Rotherham 105 Sheffield 107 West Yorkshire 111 Bradford 111 Calderdale 115 Kirklees 120 Leeds 124 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good. -
Jeremy Musson, 'The Battle for Lady Tankerville's Bedroom: Wyatville's
Jeremy Musson, ‘The battle for Lady Tankerville’s bedroom: Wyatville’s unexecuted plans for Chillingham Castle’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XXIII, 2015, pp. 195–212 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2015 THE BATTLE FOR LADY TANKERVILLE’S BEDROOM: WYATVILLE’S UNEXECUTED PLANS FOR CHILLINGHAM CASTLE JEREMY MUSSON effry Wyatville ( – ) was one of the Smirke, Nash, and Soane. There he recreated the Jimpresario architects of the late-Georgian period. medieval glamour of this famous seat of the British Ambitious and able, he was said to be easy company monarch – and earned the title ‘Architect to the and, unlike his talented uncle James Wyatt, in whose King’. One of his less known commissions, from the office he had worked, he was also business-like and same year as his Windsor appointment, was an efficient. Wyatville (plain Wyatt until but, as ambitious plan for additions to Chillingham Castle known as Wyatville for the subject of this article, that in Northumberland for the fifth Earl of Tankerville surname shall be used throughout) was prolific. His ( – ) of which only a small element was greatest achievement was the restoration and actually executed – owing it seems to a disagreement rebuilding of Windsor Castle in – , the with the Countess of Tankerville about her bedroom commission for which he won in competition with (Fig. ). Fig. Chillingham Castle, the north front and the splay walls. ( Country Life Picture Library ) THE GEORGIAN GROUP JOURNAL VOLUME XXIII THE BATTLE FOR LADY TANKERVILLE ’ S BEDROOM : WYATVILLE ’ S PLANS FOR CHILLINGHAM CASTLE This story is revealed in a surviving album of castellar houses were as likely as to have fine signed plans, dated , entitled ‘Designs/for Classical interiors as Gothic.