Heritage at Risk Register 2019, North East And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heritage at Risk Register 2019, North East And North East & Yorkshire Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 131 Content and criteria III York (UA) 133 Key Statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 25 Tees Valley 31 Darlington (UA) 31 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 46 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 61 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 62 Harrogate 65 North York Moors (NP) 68 Richmondshire 75 Ryedale 78 Scarborough 90 Selby 93 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 96 South Yorkshire 100 Barnsley 100 Doncaster 102 Peak District (NP) 105 Rotherham 106 Sheffield 108 West Yorkshire 112 Bradford 112 Calderdale 116 Kirklees 121 Leeds 126 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good. This reflects the fact that some buildings or structures are vulnerable The aim of the Register is to focus attention on because they are empty, underused or face those places in greatest need. Historic England, in redundancy without a new use to secure their partnership with others, is able to help tackle future. Assessing vulnerability in the case of buildings heritage at risk. We work with owners, friends in fair condition necessarily involves judgement and groups, developers and other stakeholders to find discretion. A few buildings remain on the Register in imaginative solutions for historic places and sites at good condition, having been repaired or mothballed, risk across England. but still awaiting a new use or occupancy. More information about our role, the advice and Buildings or structures are removed from the funding available, and useful publications and Register when they are fully repaired/consolidated, guidance is available on our website. and their future secured either through occupation and use, or through the adoption of appropriate Criteria for inclusion management. on the Register PLACES OF WORSHIP To be considered for inclusion on the Register, places RISK ASSESSMENTS of worship must be listed grade I, grade II* or grade II on the National Heritage List for England, and be used Heritage assets included on the Register are assessed as a public place of worship at least six times a year. according to the nature of the site. The risk assessment methodologies outlined below are based Places of worship are assessed on the basis of on factors which can threaten the different types of condition only. If a place of worship is in very bad or heritage assets and lead to them becoming at risk. poor condition, it is added to the Register. This includes places of worship which are generally in fair BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES or good condition but have major problems with one key element, like the tower. To be considered for inclusion on the Register, buildings or structures must be: Once on the Register, places of worship can move through the condition categories (e.g. from very bad • listed on the National Heritage List for England; to poor, to fair, even good) as repairs are and implemented and the condition improves, until they • in secular (non-worship) use. are fully repaired and can be removed from the And either: Register. This means that there are some places of • a grade I or II* listed building, or worship in good condition on the Register but with • a grade II listed building in London, or outstanding issues still to be resolved at the time when • a structural scheduled monument with they were assessed. upstanding remains. ARCHAEOLOGY Buildings or structures are assessed on the basis of condition and, where applicable, occupancy (or use) To be considered for inclusion on the Register, reflecting the fact that a building which is occupied archaeological sites must be listed as scheduled is generally less vulnerable than one that is not. monuments and included on the National Heritage List for England. Occupancy (or use) is assessed as ‘vacant’, ‘part- occupied’, ‘occupied’, ‘not applicable’, or occasionally, Archaeology assessments cover scheduled ‘unknown’. earthworks and buried archaeology. III HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE The risk assessment is based on their condition and Wreck sites are assessed based on their current vulnerability, the trend in their condition, and their condition, vulnerability and the way they are being likely future vulnerability. A site’s condition is managed. expressed in terms of the scale and severity of adverse effects on it, ranging from ‘extensive Wrecks are vulnerable to both environmental and significant problems’ to ‘minor localised problems’. human impacts. Risks that contribute to inclusion on the Register range from unauthorised access to Archaeological entries are removed from the erosion and fishing damage. The monitoring process Register once sufficient progress has been made to ensures that the significance of the site is identified address the identified issues, and a significant and maintained. In spite of the inherent difficulties in reduction in the level of risk has been demonstrated. caring for this type of site, careful management must be maintained. PARKS AND GARDENS Wrecks are removed from the Register once an To be considered for inclusion on the Register, parks appropriate management and monitoring regime and gardens must be listed as grade I, grade II* or is operational. grade II and included on the National Heritage List for England. Parks and gardens are assessed in terms of CONSERVATION AREAS condition and vulnerability. Steps being taken by owners to address problems are also taken into Once a year Historic England asks every local consideration. authority in England to consider the state of its conservation areas and fill in (and update as Parks and gardens assessed as being at risk are typically appropriate) risk assessment questionnaires for affected by development and neglect. They have those that cause concern, or are believed to no frequently been altered by development or are faced longer be at risk. with major change. The original function of these landscapes has often changed and divided ownership Conservation areas that are deteriorating, or are in leads to the loss of their cohesive historic design. very bad or poor condition and not expected to change significantly in the next three years, are Park and garden entries are removed from the defined as being at risk. Register once steps have been taken to address issues and positive progress is being made. The approach taken to assess conservation areas at risk has been refined since the first survey in 2008/2009. An BATTLEFIELDS overall category for condition, vulnerability and trend is included for each conservation area on the Heritage at To be considered for inclusion on the Register, Risk Register. Conservation areas identified as at risk in battlefields must be listed and included on the 2009, but not reassessed since using the revised National Heritage List for England. Battlefields methodology, are included on the Register but with deemed to be at risk of loss of cultural significance limited information. are included on the Register. Conservation areas are removed from the Register The principal risks and threats are: once plans have been put in place to address the • development pressure e.g. issues that led to the conservation area being at risk, encroachment of buildings; and once positive progress is being made. • pressures of particular use within the site e.g. arable cultivation; • damage e.g. unregulated metal detecting. Battlefields are removed from the Register either when damaging activities cease/are managed, or when threats recede due to effective planning. WRECK SITES To be considered for inclusion on the Register, wrecks must be listed and included on the National Heritage List for England. IV HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Key statistics Nationally, damage from arable cultivation is the greatest cause of risk affecting 37.6% of BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES archaeological entries on the Register. In the North East and Yorkshire it is also the greatest Nationally, 748(3.3%) of grade I and II* listed risk, and the proportion of archaeological entries buildings (excluding places of worship) are on it affects is 37.3%. the Register. In the North East and Yorkshire the percentage is 5.3% (133listed secular buildings). PARKS AND GARDENS 102(6.1%) of England’s 1,669 registered parks 9 building or structure entries have been and gardens are on the Register. Of the 180 removed from the 2018 North East and registered parks and gardens in the North East Yorkshire Register because their futures have and Yorkshire, 18(10%) are on the Register. been secured, and 4 have been added. No park and garden entries were added to or 69.4% of buildings or structures (202) on the removed from the 2018 North East and North East and Yorkshire baseline 1999 Register Yorkshire Register. have been removed because their futures have been secured compared to the national figure of BATTLEFIELDS 65.3%. Of the 47 registered battlefields in England, 3 (6.4%) are on the Register.
Recommended publications
  • Mavis Dixon VAD Database.Xlsx
    County Durham Voluntary Aid Detachment workers, 1914-1919 www.durhamatwar.org.uk Surname Forename Address Role Further information Service from 2/1915 to 12/1915 and 7/1916 to 8/1917. 13th Durham Margaret Ann Mount Stewart St., V.A.H., Vane House, Seaham Harbour. Husband George William, Coal Lacey Nurse. Part time. 1610 hours worked. (Mrs) Dawdon Miner/Stoneman, son Benjamin. Born Felling c1880. Married 1901 Easington District – maiden name McElwee. Bon Accord, Foggy Furze, Service from 12/1915 to date. 8th Durham V.A.H., Normanhurst, West Ladyman Grace Cook. Part time. 2016 hours worked. West Hartlepool Hartlepool. Not in Hartlepool 1911. C/o Mrs. Atkinson, Service from 1915 to 1/1917. 17th Durham V.A.H., The Red House, Laidler Mary E Wellbank, Morpeth. Sister. Full time. Paid. Etherley, Bishop Auckland. Too many on 1911 census to get a safe Crossed out on the card. match. Service from 1/11/1918 to 1/4/1919. Oulton Hall (Officers’ Hospital), C/o Mrs J Watson, 39 High Waitress. Pay - £26 per annum. Full Laine Emily Leeds. Attd. Military Hospital, Ripon 6/1918 and 7/1918. Not in Crook Jobs Hill, Crook time. on 1911 census. 7 Thornhill Park, Kitchen helper. 30 hours alternate Service from 12/1917 to 2/1919. 3rd Durham V.A.H., Hammerton Laing E. Victoria Sunderland weeks. House, 4 Gray Road, Sunderland. Unable to trace 1911 census. Lake Frank West Park Road, Cleadon Private. Driver. Service from 30/2/1917 to 1919. Unable to trace 1911 census. 15 Rowell St., West Service from 19/2/1917 to 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • House Number Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Town/Area County
    House Number Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Town/Area County Postcode 64 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 70 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 72 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 74 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 80 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 82 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 84 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 1 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 2 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 3 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 4 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 1 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 3 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 5 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 7 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 9 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 11 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 13 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 15 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 17 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 19 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 21 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 23 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 25 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16
    [Show full text]
  • Sunderland City Council Highway Maintenance Programme 2021 - 2022
    'This map is based upon the Ordnance Survey material with the permission of the Ordnace Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence No. 100018385. Date 2021. SUNDERLAND CITY COUNCIL HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAMME 2021 - 2022 101 105 95 239 SOUTHWICK 228 FULWELL 92 REDHILL 104 106 115 111 102 100 115 103 109 118 107 WASHINGTON WEST 110 116 122 108 94 241 WASHINGTON NORTH 95 236 ST PETERS 163 CASTLE 112 164 97 113 119 123 120 165 Usworth 143 93 121 148 114 Castletown Sulgrave Springwell Donwell Concord 162 117 147 98 99 129 144 146 161 127 223 184 145 187 74 158 PALLION 191 180 188 73 70 MILLFIELD 157 125 207 Armstrong 189 67 HENDON WASHINGTON 46 124 48 186 126 71 233 159 75 160 215 65 76 Blackfell 234 170 240 190 68 60 142 181 69 166 Washington 136 ST ANNES Village Barmston 137 208 213 230 65 132 216 61 177 84 154 209 178 211 171 85 Oxclose WASHINGTONGlebe 183 182 173 225 72 156 244 172 214 185 Ashbrooke 243 CENTRAL 41 155 83 134 212 210 224 64 149 Biddick 63 131 B1405 BARNES ST MICHAELS Lambton 130 169 86 133 174 90 59 62 138 91 81 Ayton 175 128 40 193 176 82 35 179 195 150 WASHINGTON SANDHILLSpringwell 200 192 89 Emerson 194 87 EAST SHINEY ROW Grindon 204 WASHINGTON Hastings Hill 226 153 135 197 SOUTH 196 139 140 198 220 SILKSWORTH 43 152 Fatfield 141 Mount Ryhope Colliery Pleasant 44 203 151 201 ST CHADS 202 Penshaw 221 217 RYHOPE West 222 229 Herrington 199 57 218 205 206 42 80 79
    [Show full text]
  • East Durham College Dedicated Bus Services
    East Durham College ED1 Burnopfield to ED2 Blackfell to EDC Houghall Campus EDC Peterlee Campus Dedicated Bus Services Burnopfield, Post Office 0658 Blackfell, Knoulberry Road 0715 from 31st August 2021 Medomsley Church 0710 Concord Bus Station 0721 Term Time Only Consett Bus Station 0720 Washington Galleries Bus Station 0728 Annfield Plain, Tesco 0731 Shiney Row, Wheatsheaf 0738 Stanley Bus Station 0741 Newbottle, Front Street 0742 Sacriston, Greenwells Garage 0755 Houghton-le-Spring, Church 0747 1207 Student ID Cards must be shown when Aykley Heads 0806 Hetton-le-Hole Interchange 0754 1214 boarding any of the dedicated services EDC Houghall Campus 0817 South Hetton, Grasmere Terrace 0804 1224 Easington Lane High Street 0810 1230 Connections between services can be made at EDC Houghall Campus 1738 Murton, Cenotaph 0815 1235 either the Peterlee Campus or Houghall Campus Aykley Heads 1753 EDC Peterlee Campus 0825 1245 Sacriston, Greenwells Garage 1759 Stanley Bus Station 1811 EDC Peterlee Campus 1315 1735 Annfield Plain, Tesco 1819 Murton, Cenotaph 1325 1745 ED4 North Hylton to Consett Bus Station 1829 Easington Lane High Street 1330 1750 EDC Peterlee Campus Medomsley Church 1837 South Hetton, Grasmere Terrace 1335 1755 Burnopfield, Post Office 1848 Hetton-le-Hole Interchange 1344 1804 Houghton-le-Spring, Church 1352 1812 North Hylton, Business Park 0717 Newbottle, Front Street 1816 Hylton Castle, Health Centre 0722 Shiney Row, Wheatsheaf 1820 Southwick Green 0727 Darlington to Washington Galleries Bus Station 1829 Fulwell, The Grange
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Fireplace...* Hello and a Very Warm Welcome to Members and Supporters to This Third Issue of Our Newsletter, Cupola
    CTYNE & WEAU R Building PrePOLAservation Trust NEWSLETTER Issue 3 WINTER 2018 Through the fireplace...* Hello and a very warm welcome to members and supporters to this third issue of our newsletter, Cupola. As we surge on into 2018 you find us building on our programme of events to involve and entertain you - more on that below. Meantime, victorious in our struggle with dust, we now face a fresh challenge with a railway winding mechanism. On other fronts, we are getting to grips with a relic of Primitive Methodism in Weardale and undertaking urgent works to a terrace of listed buildings in Sunderland. We've welcomed a new member to the team and seen a craftsman become an angel. You really do see it all in the heritage sector. Enjoy reading about it, thank you for your kind support and we look forward to seeing you at a members' event soon. Yours, Martin Hulse, Trust Manager. Back to the Wall Volunteer's Viewpoint This month we hear from Ged Parker, committee member of the Tyne and Wear Heritage Forum. The Forum is an important group member of the Trust, with its own ranks lending valuable, much needed support to Trust activities. The Forum is an alliance of key heritage bodies and individuals active within the North-East of England. At a time of restricted public funding for protection and preservation of heritage, the Forum seeks to make a tangible and significant impact on the regional environment to the benefit of those who live and work here, and businesses which are based here.
    [Show full text]
  • East Durham Rural Corridor AAP Board 21 January 2021
    East Durham Rural Corridor Area Action Partnership Minutes of the Board Meeting Thursday 21 January 2021 (Virtual Meeting - held via Microsoft Teams) Present: Malcolm Gray (Chair), Cllr Stuart Dunn, Angela Stobbart, Jen Straughan-Hawley, Chris Varty, Cllr Peter Brookes (Alternate), Tony Cutmore, Peter Maddison, Cllr Maura McKeon, Neighbourhood Insp Sarah Honeyman, Maureen Dixon-Berne (for Michelle Atkinson) Officer Attendance: Jane Bellis – AAP Co-ordinator Lyndsey Hunter – Community Development Project Officer Marie Ainscough – AAP Support Officer Presenters: Gary Ridley- Assistant Chief Officer for the force and Chief Finance Officer for the PCVC’s Office Sharon Caddell – Interim Chief Executive and Monitoring Officer for the PCVC’s Office for Durham Forum Members: 6 forum members attended the meeting Apologies: Cllr Lucy Hovvels, Jo Farrell, Allan Blakemore, Mel Carr, Cllr John Robinson, Clair White, Steve White, Cllr David Brown Introductions and Apologies Malcolm Gray welcomed everyone to the virtual board meeting of the East Durham Rural Corridor AAP and apologies were noted for those who were unable to attend the meeting. Minutes of the Meeting held on 23 November 2020 & Matters Arising The minutes of the meeting held on 23 November 2020 were agreed as a true and accurate record. Cllr John Robinson requested a report on how much had been allocated for each county ward in the AAP area. This information will be brought to next board meeting in March which will be the year end meeting. Declarations of Interest/ Meeting Etiquette/ New Ways of Working Everyone was reminded of the meeting etiquette. Countywide Partner Issues Custody Briefing Sharon Caddell and Gary Ridley delivered a joint presentation in relation to the new centralised custody facility.
    [Show full text]
  • Division Boundaries in City of Durham and Durham South
    SHEET 8, MAP 8 Electoral division boundaries in the City of Durham and Durham South LE AVENUE R FINCHA Union Hall Farm iv FRAMWELLGATE MOOR CP e y r a w W l The Arnison Centre i e ) Poultry Farm a a R r M AD ( RO HALE d INC 1 e F l t Moor House Farm Mercia HM Prison A n a ) s i 7 Retail Park Frankland m 6 s d 1 i ( HOUSE LANE A Low Newton D y POTTER A E a BB N w l EY A Remand Centre i RD L HM Prison a AD T Mallygill RO I R BEY Sports P Frankland Quarry T AB Civic E Recreation Centre (dis) WEST RAINTON CP Amenity E Pity Me R Ground Site T S T C SHERBURN ED N Abbey Road A N O Industrial Estate T R W E i F R nc B Pond h 0 B U G 9 R ill 6 6 Y A 53 2 R O D A i AD s RO RY D m OTHBU R a n Finchale t l e y Primary d a R w l E School i a a N i l Pond w R A L a d y e T l I t P n a ESH AND WITTON m s i GILBERT ED D P IT T IN G C T y P O T Di a N E s w WITTON GILBERT CP E ma il E n RIV tled a R R D R E ailw d T S a OU y tle S H n R a T R Earl's House CA m N is D Hospital O St Godric's RC VA R FRAMWELLGATE AND Sewage Works F Playing Field Primary School ) k NEWTON HALL ED c ra T E DRIVE ( CARR HOUS E N A Belmont L R Framwellgate D ive Viaduct y N r W a A e School w L ar Dismantled Railway il Quarry a K Durham L N A R A (dis) (Secondary) N NEWTON HALL d R B le F E G t n King K L Running a R E Durham George's m O Y Track A Blue Coat is Golf Course Field D R D O Junior School A 7 Framwellgate Moor D 6 E 1 N Primary School A A L D Durham A IT O P Newton Hall Playing Field R Infants' School RBURY Caravan Park CANTE BEK ROAD D Ramside Hall A O Hotel R 0
    [Show full text]
  • A City Farm for Hull: a Feasibility Study
    A City Farm for Hull: A Feasibility Study Federation of City Farms & Community Gardens December 2013 A City Farm for Hull: Feasibility Study Contents Executive Summary 2 1.0 Context ……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 2.0 Planning Issues and Requirements ……………………………………… 4 3.0 Realistic Estimates of Start-up Costs and ongoing revenue … 5 4.0 Potential Models of Delivery………………………………………………… 8 5.0 Potential Activities ………………………………………………………………. 10 6.0 Health and Safety Issues ……………………………………………………… 12 7.0 Legal Issues and Regulations.................................................... 15 8.0 Other Resources Required …………………………………………………… 18 9.0 Potential Partners and Links to Complementary Activities ….. 19 10.0 Social, Economic and Environmental Benefits ……………………… 23 11.0 Risks and Risk Management ………………………………………………… 24 12.0 Potential Income Streams and Sources of External Funding .. 27 13.0 Learning from Elsewhere ........................................................ 29 14.0 Stakeholder Views ………………………………………………………………. 31 15.0 Potential Customers/Service Users /visitors ………………………… 33 16.0 Sustainability Issues …………………………………………………………….. 34 17.0 Local Context ………………………………………………………………………. 36 18.0 Conclusions …………………………………………………………………………. 38 19.0 Recommendations .................................................................. 40 Appendices 1. Record of Stakeholder Meetings ….……………………………………………………….. 41 2. Learning and design photographs …………………………………………………………. 49 3. References ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 54 Acknowledgements Hull City
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefice of Harton
    The Benefice of Harton The Circular Spring edition 2016 February March April Sand Hutton Claxton Flaxton Gate Helmsley Upper Helmsley Bossall Buttercrambe Howsham Harton Whitwell-on-the-Hill Crambe Foston Barton-le-Willows Thornton-le-Clay This edition’s cover has been sponsored by All Saints Church, Foston If anyone is interested in sponsoring a colour page for The Circular to commemorate an event please contact the editor for more information From The Vicarage Dear Friends ‘Mind the Gap’ In a different life I commuted every day from Kent to London. Feeling a bit like the Reggie Perrin of old, I travelled daily from Tonbridge to Canon Street, then underground to Bank station in the City. Each morning, as the doors ‘shhhhhhhd’ open, I alighted from the carriage to the sound of the monotonous, regular intonation: ‘Bank station: mind the gap – please mind the gap’ Gaps can be worrying things. Real gaps – that space between the edge of a platform and the step of a train - can be a chasm for lost shoes, dropped keys, fumbled tickets or worse. And yet often the ‘gaps’ in our lives can be even more worrying if we let them. It’s the gap between ‘where I am now’ and ‘where am I going to’ That gap between the certainty of the here and now and the uncertainty of the future can often contain fear, isolation, exclusion, bereavement, loss, grief, self-pity: all these are often more frightening and more real to some than the six inches one has to ‘mind’ at Bank Underground.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology in Northumberland Friends
    100 95 75 Archaeology 25 5 in 0 Northumberland 100 95 75 25 5 0 Volume 20 Contents 100 100 Foreword............................................... 1 95 Breaking News.......................................... 1 95 Archaeology in Northumberland Friends . 2 75 What is a QR code?...................................... 2 75 Twizel Bridge: Flodden 1513.com............................ 3 The RAMP Project: Rock Art goes Mobile . 4 25 Heiferlaw, Alnwick: Zero Station............................. 6 25 Northumberland Coast AONB Lime Kiln Survey. 8 5 Ecology and the Heritage Asset: Bats in the Belfry . 11 5 0 Surveying Steel Rigg.....................................12 0 Marygate, Berwick-upon-Tweed: Kilns, Sewerage and Gardening . 14 Debdon, Rothbury: Cairnfield...............................16 Northumberland’s Drove Roads.............................17 Barmoor Castle .........................................18 Excavations at High Rochester: Bremenium Roman Fort . 20 1 Ford Parish: a New Saxon Cemetery ........................22 Duddo Stones ..........................................24 Flodden 1513: Excavations at Flodden Hill . 26 Berwick-upon-Tweed: New Homes for CAAG . 28 Remapping Hadrian’s Wall ................................29 What is an Ecomuseum?..................................30 Frankham Farm, Newbrough: building survey record . 32 Spittal Point: Berwick-upon-Tweed’s Military and Industrial Past . 34 Portable Antiquities in Northumberland 2010 . 36 Berwick-upon-Tweed: Year 1 Historic Area Improvement Scheme. 38 Dues Hill Farm: flint finds..................................39
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Minutes of the Planning Meeting of Adderstone with Lucker Parish Council Held on Tuesday 13Th February 2018 at Watson Memoria
    Minutes of the Planning Meeting of Adderstone with Lucker Parish Council Held on Tuesday 13th February 2018 at Watson Memorial Hall Lucker at 7.00p.m. Website: https://northumberlandparishes.uk/adderstone Present: Chairman J Clough Vice-Chairman J Baillie Parish Councillors: L Harrison L Robson D Spours & J Mallen Clerk I Hunter County Councillor G Renner-Thompson 11 members of the public. Public Question Time: Members of the public raised the following concerns and comments about the proposed closure of the A1 on 2nd March for 17 days. • There has been no formal consultation or notification. • One pub had been consulted and they are requesting support from Highways England for the wages account as they will have no income. • Businesses will be affected. • The MP Anne-Marie Trevelyan has been contacted and has been involved. • The owners of Purdy Lodge have e-mailed Highway’s England with proposals to reduce the impact on local businesses. So far, no reply has been received. • The contractor Tarmac have agreed to meet Mr & Mrs Davidson and family at 5pm on 14th February to discuss the issue. • The MP Anne-Marie Trevelyan can put an order in place to defer the proposed works. County Councillor G Renner-Thompson to follow this up. • Residents will be able to access and exit their junction by a convoy system, however there will be a minimum of a 20-minute wait. • HGV’s will use minor roads. County Councillor G Renner-Thompson replied Northumberland County Council will be surveying the diversion routes ahead of the proposed works, to allow them to a record of the current road conditions.
    [Show full text]