DOCSLIB.ORG

A City Farm for Hull: a Feasibility Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A City Farm for Hull: a Feasibility Study A City Farm for Hull: A Feasibility Study Federation of City Farms & Community Gardens December 2013 A City Farm for Hull: Feasibility Study Contents Executive Summary 2 1.0 Context ……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 2.0 Planning Issues and Requirements ……………………………………… 4 3.0 Realistic Estimates of Start-up Costs and ongoing revenue … 5 4.0 Potential Models of Delivery………………………………………………… 8 5.0 Potential Activities ………………………………………………………………. 10 6.0 Health and Safety Issues ……………………………………………………… 12 7.0 Legal Issues and Regulations.................................................... 15 8.0 Other Resources Required …………………………………………………… 18 9.0 Potential Partners and Links to Complementary Activities ….. 19 10.0 Social, Economic and Environmental Benefits ……………………… 23 11.0 Risks and Risk Management ………………………………………………… 24 12.0 Potential Income Streams and Sources of External Funding .. 27 13.0 Learning from Elsewhere ........................................................ 29 14.0 Stakeholder Views ………………………………………………………………. 31 15.0 Potential Customers/Service Users /visitors ………………………… 33 16.0 Sustainability Issues …………………………………………………………….. 34 17.0 Local Context ………………………………………………………………………. 36 18.0 Conclusions …………………………………………………………………………. 38 19.0 Recommendations .................................................................. 40 Appendices 1. Record of Stakeholder Meetings ….……………………………………………………….. 41 2. Learning and design photographs …………………………………………………………. 49 3. References ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 54 Acknowledgements Hull City Council for their ongoing support, Jerome Wittingham for his help providing IT support and ideas, North Bank Forum for their support with the consultation event and Richard Ralph from Architectural Design Partnership Ltd for his work on the Concept Drawings. A City Farm for Hull: Feasibility Study, December 2013 1 Executive Summary The study on creating a city farm for Hull shows that it is possible to create a mobile farm that can deliver the desired outcomes required as identified in the ‘Making Money Go Further’ consultation – which is a Hull City Council plan priority - whilst being flexible to land opportunities in the City of Hull. Key to the farms success will be its first location ensuring that the project is seen as truly valued as an important element of the City, and that the participants feel welcomed. All locations should be assessed for their territorial neutrality. Design plays an important role in the same way as location. In this respect, the key elements of the farm should be as high quality as possible with inspirational design ideas. To engender ownership and future participation, where ever possible the community should be encouraged to take part in all aspects of the farm development and delivery through the construction of container architecture to constructing raised beds. The Farm should be an independent body rather than a project delivered by a larger organisation to ensure it remains true to its objectives yet adaptable to opportunities. To provide stability, it should be supported by external exemplar farm projects that demonstrate synergies in vision and approach. The supporting farms should provide support guidance and mentoring to nurture the farm in its first years until it is fully established. The farm must be set up to deliver a range of goods and services to create diverse income streams and look not just to grants to sustain itself. Further, the farm should look to the local business community to support its work. There is a significant regulatory framework in which city farms operate. This should be seen as enabling rather than a burden and must be managed to the highest standard and given high priority to ensure that the best experience is had by all. The city farm has tremendous potential to help build social cohesion, improve the site on which it is located, and through its accessibility and diversity of services, will act as a significant hub for city wide related activities, both social and environmental. The Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens will continue to support this vision for a City Farm in Hull through its local contacts and centrally. A City Farm for Hull: Feasibility Study, December 2013 2 1.0 Context Through wide consultation with the local community on ‘Making Money Go Further’, Hull City Council has identified a number of needs that could be addressed through a city farm in the centre of Hull. A constraint to such a project is the availability of land. Following a meeting between the City Council and the Federation of City Farms and Community Gardens (FCFCG), arranged to discuss a potential for creating a city farm close to the centre of the City of Hull, an idea of a pop up or mobile farm project based on the ‘meanwhile’ concept was mooted as a solution to the lack of land available on a permanent basis. Some initial research was carried out by the FCFCG and its local contacts to identify similar projects where lessons could be learned to inform such a project. Following discussions with the City Council, a feasibility study was commissioned to consider in more detail how a pop up or mobile farm could work in the City of Hull based on the ‘meanwhile concept’. This report presents the information gathered from research carried out in fulfilment of contractual requirements of the feasibility study identified above, provides conclusions and recommendations for further work to enable a City Farm based on Meanwhile use to be set up in Hull, but with the long term aim to find a permanent site. A City Farm for Hull: Feasibility Study, December 2013 3 2.0 Planning Issues and Requirements Information provided by the Hull City Council planning department indicate 5 key areas of Planning issues that need to be taken into consideration theses are: 2.1 Flood Risk Assessment – Hull is a low lying area at risk of inundation from the sea. Any proposed project would require a Flood Risk Assessment wherever it is situated. The Environment Agency are looking considering the project with a view to giving some preliminary advice –To Follow. 2.2 Transport Assessment – Currently, there is a road redevelopment scheme being investigated for the A63 near the Fruit Market. Any project near this redevelopment would need to be considered in the light of this project as it may impact on the site and on traffic around it. Contact with the City Council to check for Road schemes and their impact should be made for any site as a precaution. 2.3 A Highways assessment for Access and Parking will be required. 2.4 Public Right of Way (PROW) – Sites should be checked to discover any PROW that may cross them to ensure these are not compromised. Changing PROW is an expensive and time consuming business and the law protecting them is strong. It would be prudent to ensure that no infrastructure blocks a PROW and if the farm business plan is to include access by payment and a PROW also give access, the farm will not have the power to stop PROW users form accessing the farm free of charge. 2.5 Contaminated Land – Former industrial sites pose a risk through potential contamination of the ground; this issue is dealt with in other sections. Planning Application - The Farm project would need planning permission. A City Farm for Hull: Feasibility Study, December 2013 4 3.0 Realistic Estimates of Start-up Costs and ongoing revenue There are pre-requisites to identifying realistic estimates of start-up and ongoing costs. These include confirmation of site location, completion of contaminated land assessment, chosen model of delivery, definitive list of activities for which the market needs to be assessed. In short, this information can only be fully defined when a site has been confirmed. However, it is possible to identify a range of estimates for different elements of infrastructure and staff salaries for similar projects that can help give an understanding of the costs that could be incurred. 3.1 Infrastructure – Buildings A city farm will need some form of building, whether it is simply a tool store and toilet facility, through to café, shop and multipurpose rooms for training, meetings, exhibitions etc. When considering the community needs identified through the Making Money go Further consultation documents and from discussions with council officers and councillors, it is clear that the city farm will need to have space for activities to engage and educate visitors/participants, and some form of trading facility to both provide an income and provide access to healthy food. As this approach is for ‘meanwhile’ use of vacant development sites, any built infrastructure will need to be constructed independently of the land on which it is situated. Having looked at other similar approaches elsewhere, it has been identified that containerised buildings would be suitable. These range from the very high specification container architecture down the most basic construction site office system. This form of building is gaining in both popularity and in innovation of design making it strong, flexible and good value for money, whilst creating a sense of modernity and high value. The quality of design and implementation is a reflection on the value placed on the people for who the project is designed for. This is no more clearly articulated in the Thomas Theorem ‘if men define situations as real, then they are real in the consequences’ (cited in Gross, 2007). If you want people to believe that they have value, then they must be show that they are valued. The project should aim to create space that looks and feels exciting to excite people. Porta- cabins and static caravans don’t do this, bespoke buildings are expensive, container architecture has a young but exciting pedigree to deliver this approach. An indication of costs for a range of containerised buildings is given below. The container café providing kitchen and server without seating at the National Railway Museum in York cost in the region of £35,000 for the structure and a further £35,000 for a high specification fit out including pizza ovens and ice cream parlour.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • House Number Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Town/Area County
    House Number Address Line 1 Address Line 2 Town/Area County Postcode 64 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 70 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 72 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 74 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 80 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 82 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 84 Abbey Grove Well Lane Willerby East Riding of Yorkshire HU10 6HE 1 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 2 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 3 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 4 Abbey Road Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 4TU 1 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 3 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 5 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 7 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 9 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 11 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 13 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 15 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 17 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 19 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 21 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 23 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16 7NA 25 Abbotts Way Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire YO16
    [Show full text]
  • Area News April 2013
    East Yorkshire & Derwent Area Ramblers Area News April 2013 In this issue AGM and Area Council Reports................2 Victory for Forestry Campaign……........8 Message from Area President....................3 The fate of our Woodlands.......................9 Coach Rambles, Old Boots........................4 EYDA 75th , Message in a Bottle............10 Reporting Problems to ERYC............…...5 Long Distance and Challenge Routes..…11 ERYC Access Officers Territory Map. 6-7 Pocklington Group 10th Birthday .......…12 www.ramblers.org.uk WORKING FOR WALKERS www.eastyorkshireramblers.org.uk Area AGM and Area Council Reports Unprecedented cancellations Well, what a winter we have had! Severe weather resulted in our AGM at Bishop Wilton as well as an unprecedented number of programmed walks having to be cancelled. Thank goodness for email and for Tony, our website manager, who has been kept exceedingly busy publishing up-to-date information. Sincere apologies to anyone who missed out on any communications. Area AGM We eventually managed to hold our AGM at Wetwang followed by a brief Area Council Meeting. Most of your Area team had agreed to stand again and were duly re-elected. Our President, Ann Holt, however had announced last year that we would need to find a replacement and Peter Ayling, who has given many years of service to the RA was unanimously voted into office. Ramblers Chief Executive Benedict Southworth speaking at our AGM New Area Secretary Photo courtesy of Peter Ayling In 2008, our Area Secreatry, Malcolm Dixon, announced his retirement, but gamely agreed 1) Turbines should not be placed closer than to remain in post until a replacement could be fall-over distance from a public right of way on found.
    [Show full text]
  • Hull Core Strategy - Contacts List (As at July 2011)
    Hull Core Strategy - Contacts List (as at July 2011) Introduction This report provides details about the contacts made during the development of the Hull Core Strategy. It includes contact made at each plan making stage, as follows: • Issues and Options – August 2008 • Emerging Preferred Approach – February 2010 • Core Strategy Questionnaire – September 2010 • Spatial Options – February 2011 • Core Strategy Publication Version – July 2011 A list of Hull Development Forum members (as at July 2011) is also enclosed. This group has met over 15 times, usually on a quarterly basis. The report also sets out the specific and general organisations and bodies that have been contacted, in conformity with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement. Specific groups are indicated with an asterisk. Please note contacts will change over time. Issues and Options – August 2008 (Letter sent to Consultants/Agents) Your Ref: My Ref: PPI/KG/JP Contact: Mr Keith Griffiths «Title» «First_Name» «Surname» Tel: 01482 612389 «Job_Title» Fax: 01482 612382 Email: [email protected] «Org» th «Add1» Date: 4 August 2008 «Add2» «Add3» «Town» «Postcode» Dear Sir/Madam Hull Core Strategy - issues, options and suggested preferred option Please find enclosed the ‘Hull Core Strategy issues, options and suggested preferred option’ document for your consideration. Your views should be returned to us by the 5 September, 2008 by using the form provided. In particular, could you respond to the following key questions: 1. What do you think to the issues, objectives, options and suggested preferred option set out in the document? 2. How would you combine the options? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / Yorkshire and the Humber
    HERITAGE AT RISK 2010 / YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 6 Publications and guidance 9 THE REGISTER 11 Content and assessment criteria 11 Key to the entries 13 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 16 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 41 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 41 North Lincolnshire (UA) 42 North Yorkshire 44 South Yorkshire 106 West Yorkshire 117 York (UA) 130 The Heritage at Risk Register helps us to identify the most threatened buildings, archaeological sites and landscapes in this most distinctive of English regions. For the 60% of listed buildings on this year’s Register that could have a sustainable future through commercial or residential reuse, the economic downturn has brought additional challenges to which we must now respond. This year, we undertook a pioneering 15% sample survey of England’s 14,500 listed places of worship to help us understand the condition of the thousands of designated churches, chapels, synagogues, mosques and temples and other faith buildings that are the spiritual focus for our communities. They face many different kinds of challenges and we need to ensure their future. In response to the expansion of asset types and changed Last year we included conservation areas in the Register economic conditions we have developed a new strategy. for the first time. This year, 46 of these, including Haworth, From now on we will focus our resources on types of Holbeck and Rotherham, are known to be at risk, site that make a particular contribution to the region’s but the survey of nearly 800 areas is proving a challenging character.
    [Show full text]
  • A NY PONDUS Report Udgave 2
    REPORT Hornsea Two Offshore Wind Farm Order 2016 – Onshore Substation Site (ONSS) Non-Material Amendment Consultation and Publication Strategy Prepared David Morgan (XDMOR), 25 September 2017 Checked Amy Stirling (S&W) 27 September 2017 Accepted Natasha Litten (NATLI) 27 September 2017 Approved Doc. no. 2916960 Table of Contents Doc. no. 2916960 A. Hornsea Project Two Offshore Wind Farm ................................................ 3 (ver. no. 2916960A) B. Onshore substation site ............................................................................. 3 C. Consented parameters for Works No 8A & 8B .......................................... 4 D. Required Changes to Requirement 2(24) .................................................. 4 E. Possible Impacts of the Proposed Change ................................................ 4 F. Consultation Proposal ................................................................................ 6 G. Publication Proposal................................................................................... 7 H. References ................................................................................................. 8 HOW02 – ONSS Non-Material Amendment Consultation and Publication Doc. no. 2916960 Strategy (ver. no. 2916960A) A. Hornsea Project Two Offshore Wind Farm 1. Project Two is the second project to be developed in the Hornsea Zone, with a total generation capacity of up to 1,800 MW. The Hornsea Two Offshore Wind Farm Order 2016 (SI 2016 No. 844 as amended by SI 2016 No. 1104) (the “Order”)
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2019, North East And
    North East & Yorkshire Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 131 Content and criteria III York (UA) 133 Key Statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 25 Tees Valley 31 Darlington (UA) 31 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 46 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 61 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 62 Harrogate 65 North York Moors (NP) 68 Richmondshire 75 Ryedale 78 Scarborough 90 Selby 93 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 96 South Yorkshire 100 Barnsley 100 Doncaster 102 Peak District (NP) 105 Rotherham 106 Sheffield 108 West Yorkshire 112 Bradford 112 Calderdale 116 Kirklees 121 Leeds 126 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good.
    [Show full text]
  • (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997
    Status: This is the original version (as it was originally made). This item of legislation is currently only available in its original format. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 1997 No. 624 HOUSING, ENGLAND AND WALES The Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 Made - - - - 5th March 1997 Laid before Parliament 7th March 1997 Coming into force - - 1st April 1997 The Secretary of State for the Environment, as respects England, in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 17 of the Housing Act 1996(1) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967(2) and of all other powers enabling him in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order— Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Housing (Right to Acquire or Enfranchise) (Designated Rural Areas in the North East) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st April 1997. Designated rural areas 2. The following areas shall be designated rural areas for the purposes of section 17 of the Housing Act 1996 (the right to acquire) and section 1AA(3)(a) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (additional right to enfranchise)— (a) the parishes in the districts of the East Riding of Yorkshire, Hartlepool, Middlesborough, North East Lincolnshire, North Lincolnshire, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees specified in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII of Schedule 1 to this Order and in the counties of Durham, Northumberland, North Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Tyne and Wear and West Yorkshire specified in Parts VIII, IX, X, XI,
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2020, North East and Yorkshire
    North East & Yorkshire Register 2020 HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE Contents The Register III Wakefield 130 Content and criteria III York (UA) 132 Key statistics V Key to the Entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority County Durham (UA) 1 Northumberland (UA) 10 Northumberland (NP) 26 Tees Valley 32 Darlington (UA) 32 Hartlepool (UA) 33 Middlesbrough (UA) 34 North York Moors (NP) 34 Redcar and Cleveland (UA) 34 Stockton-on-Tees (UA) 37 Tyne and Wear 37 Gateshead 37 Newcastle upon Tyne 39 North Tyneside 42 South Tyneside 42 Sunderland 43 East Riding of Yorkshire (UA) 45 Kingston upon Hull, City of (UA) 60 North Yorkshire 61 Craven 61 Hambleton 61 Harrogate 64 North York Moors (NP) 67 Richmondshire 74 Ryedale 77 Scarborough 89 Selby 91 Yorkshire Dales (NP) 95 South Yorkshire 98 Barnsley 98 Doncaster 100 Peak District (NP) 104 Rotherham 105 Sheffield 107 West Yorkshire 111 Bradford 111 Calderdale 115 Kirklees 120 Leeds 124 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / NORTH EAST AND YORKSHIRE THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Enforcement Areas Wold Newton
    Planning Enforcement Areas Wold Newton Bempton Burton Fleming Grindale Planning & Development Management Thwing Flamborough PRINCIPAL ENFORCEMENT OFFICER (WEST) County Hall, Boynton Beverley, Stephen Watson Bridlington Rudston HU17 9BA [email protected] Langtoft 01482 393712 Kilham Carnaby [email protected] Cottam Enforcement Officers (W) Sledmere Jeffrey Smith Burton Agnes Fimber Nafferton ENFORCEMENT TEAM LEADER Andrew Jenkison Harpham Barmston Susan Bolton Fridaythorpe Garton Wetwang Kelk Hazel Walsh Kirby Underdale Driffield Bugthorpe Ulrome Skirpenbeck [email protected] Huggate Tibthorpe Kirkburn Skerne and Wansford Foston Stamford BridgeFull Sutton Bishop Wilton Tel: 01482 393714 Skipsea Millington Beeford Catton Fangfoss Bainton Hutton Cranswick North Dalton North Frodingham Yapham Warter Wilberfoss Bewholme Atwick Watton Newton on Derwent Pocklington PRINCIPAL ENFORCEMENT OFFICER (EAST) Barmby Moor Middleton Nunburnholme Beswick Brandesburton Des Simmonds Lund Hornsea Allerthorpe Seaton Sutton upon Derwent Lockington [email protected] Hayton Dalton Holme Thornton Londesborough Leven 01482 393711 Catwick Sigglesthorne Bielby Goodmanham Leconfield Enforcement Officers (E) Etton Hatfield Mappleton Melbourne Shipton Thorpe Routh Cottingwith Rise Michael Thompson Tickton Everingham Cherry Burton Riston Market Weighton Michael Roebuck Molescroft Withernwick Seaton Ross Beverley Carly Jensen Skirlaugh Ellerton Sancton Bishop Burton Wawne Aldbrough Foggathorpe Burton Constable
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election
    EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE COUNCIL NOTICE OF ELECTION FOR THE PARISHES LISTED BELOW Town or Parish Numbers of Town or Parish Numbers of Town or Parish Numbers of Councillors Councillors to be Councillors to be to be elected elected elected Airmyn Nine Flamborough Thirteen Patrington Thirteen Aldbrough Nine Foggathorpe Seven Paull Eleven Allerthorpe Seven Foston Seven Pocklington Thirteen Anlaby with Anlaby Common, Six Fridaythorpe Seven Pollington Five Anlaby Ward Full Sutton Four Preston, North Ward Ten Anlaby with Anlaby Common, Five Garton Nine Preston, South Ward Three Anlaby Common Ward Gilberdyke Eleven Rawcliffe Nine Asselby Seven Goodmanham Nine Reedness Five Atwick Seven Goole, Central and South Ward Three Rimswell Seven Bainton Nine Goole, East Ward Three Riston Nine Barmby Moor Nine Goole, North Ward Five Roos Nine Barmby on the Marsh Seven Goole, North East Ward Three Routh Two Barmston Seven Goole, West Ward Three Rowley Eleven Beeford Eleven Goole Fields Five Rudston Eleven Bempton Seven Gowdall Five Sancton Nine Beswick Five Grindale Seven Seaton Nine Beverley, Minster North Ward Three Halsham Seven Seaton Ross Nine Beverley, Minster South Ward Four Harpham Nine Shiptonthorpe Nine Beverley, St Mary’s East Ward Four Hatfield Seven Sigglesthorne Seven Beverley, St Mary’s West Ward Three Hayton Seven Skeffling Seven Bewholme Seven Hedon Twelve Skerne and Wansford Nine Bilton Thirteen Hessle, Eastfield Ward Three Skidby Eleven Bishop Burton Nine Hessle, Northfield Ward Four Skipsea Seven Bishop Wilton Nine Hessle, Southfield
    [Show full text]
  • East Riding Housing Needs and Market Assessment
    East Riding of Yorkshire Housing Needs and Market Assessment Final Report May 2007 JOB NUMBER: 5042721 DOCUMENT REF: Document1 0 Draft Report MB/MT RS PL LC Jul-06 1 Draft Final Report MB/MT RS PL LC Sep-06 2 Final Report MB/MT RS PL LC Nov-06 3 Amended Final Report MB/MT RS PL LC Dec-06 4 Amended AS LC Apr 07 Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Revision Purpose Description East Riding of Yorkshire Housing Needs and Market Assessment CONTENTS Glossary 1-1 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 2. POLICY CONTEXT 2-1 National Policy 2-1 Regional Policy 2-5 Local Policy 2-12 3. SPATIAL EXTENT OF LOCAL HOUSING MARKETS 3-1 Conclusions 3-3 4. KEY ECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS 4-1 Conclusions 4-13 5. SUPPLY OF DWELLINGS 5-1 Introduction 5-1 Stock of Dwellings 5-1 Housing Pipeline 5-10 Conclusions 5-12 6. MARKET PROFILE 6-1 Introduction 6-1 Methodology 6-1 Market Profile by Sub-area 6-2 Conclusion 6-12 7. HOUSING MARKET ASSESSMENT 7-1 Conclusions 7-18 8. HOUSING NEEDS ANALYSIS 8-1 Introduction 8-1 Conclusions 8-34 i East Riding HMAS Final Report.doc East Riding of Yorkshire Housing Needs and Market Assessment List of Tables Table 3.1 – Migration movements originating in East Riding 2000-2001 3-2 Table 3.2 – Migration movements to East Riding 2000-2001 3-4 Table 3.3 – Destination of commuters who live in East Riding 3-5 Table 3.4 – Origin of commuters who work within East Riding 3-5 Table 4.1 – Total Population 2001 by Sub-area 4-1 Table 4.2 – Population change 1982-2002 4-3 Table 4.3 – Population Turnover 2000-2001 4-5 Table 4.4 – Total Migration per
    [Show full text]
  • Representations Statement (Regulation 31 Statement)
    Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004: Statement of Community Involvement: Submission Consultation Statement (Pursuant to Regulation 31) The Town & Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004 REPRESENTATIONS STATEMENT (REGULATION 31 STATEMENT) Consultation undertaken under Regulation 28 We amended the draft SCI in view of the comments received, and formally submitted this version to the Secretary of State on 16th June 2006. From 16th June to 28th July 2006, we undertook consultation on our submitted SCI. The SCI and DPD matters were available in at all East Riding libraries and Customer Service Centre. The SCI and pre-submission consultation statement and DPD matters were published on our website, along with advice on where and when paper copies were available for inspection. We placed an advertisement in Bridlington Free Press, The Holderness Gazette, Driffield Times, East Riding Mail and Advertiser Series and the Goole Times. These were carried on June 7th and 8th 2006. We sent copies of the document, along with the pre-submission consultation statement (Reg. 28 Statement), the DPD matters and details of the time and place where the documents were available for inspection, to the bodies listed in Appendix A. Notified those individuals who asked to be notified of the submission. We further publicised the submission and availability of the document in the Council’s monthly publication East Riding News, planning surgeries and letters to 950 organisations and individuals on our freestanding database. We enclose a copy of the advertisement as well as a copy of the DPD matters in Appendix B. We have received 43 representations.
    [Show full text]