DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas Attorney General Opinion Re

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas Attorney General Opinion Re Home Page Community Page Treaties in Archive Page July 18, 2005 The Honorable Frank Madla, Chair Opinion No. GA-0339 Committee on Intergovernmental Relations Re: Whether the Live Oak Treaty of 1838 Texas State Senate is still a binding agreement (RQ-0310- Post Office Box 12068 GA) Austin, Texas 78711-2068 Dear Senator Madla: Without factual background or context, you ask us to opine whether the "Live Oak Treaty, which was signed on January 8, 1838 by the Lipan Apaches of Texas, and subsequently adopted, ratified and concurred 1 on by the 1st and 3rd Texas Legislature,2 [is] still considered a binding agreement." 3 The treaty about which you inquire, entitled "Treaty Between the Republic of Texas and the Lipan Apache Indians, January 8, 1838," was executed between the Lipan Indians ("Lipan") and the Republic of Texas ("Republic"). 4 See Request Letter, supra note 3, at 5-7. The preamble to the treaty recites that the treaty is to secure the "Peace and perpetual friendship between the Republic of Texas and the Lipan Tribe of Indians." Live Oak Treaty, supra note 4. The treaty is signed by James Power on behalf of the Republic of Texas and Cuelgas de Castro as ruling Chief of the Lipan. See id. Although you inquire only about the validity of the 1838 Live Oak Treaty, you include with your request additional treaties involving the Lipan Indians: the Tehuacana Creek Treaty, dated October 9, 1844, and the San Saba Treaty, dated October 28, 1851. 5 See Request Letter, supra note 3, at 8-17. The Tehuacana Creek Treaty was executed between the "Republic of Texas and the Comanche, Keechi, Waco, Caddo, Anadarko, Ioni, Delaware, Shawnee, Cherokee, Lipan and Tawakoni tribes." Tehuacana Creek Treaty, supra note 5. It is signed on behalf of the Republic of Texas by three commissioners of the Republic: Colonel Thomas I. Smith, Colonel John C. Neill, and General Messrs E. Morehouse. See id. Ramon Castro and Captain Chico signed the treaty on behalf of the Lipan Indians. See id. The Tehuacana Creek Treaty recites that the parties "are now willing to open the path of lasting peace, friendship and trade, and are desirous to establish certain solemn rules for the regulation of their mutual intercourse." Id. The San Saba Treaty was made between the United States and the "undersigned chiefs counsellers and head men of the Comanche, Lipan, & Mescalero tribes and their associate bands." San Saba Treaty, supra note 5, at 149. The San Saba Treaty is signed by John A. Rogers, Special Agent for the Indians of Texas and Commissioner on behalf of the United States, and a large contingent of Lipan Indians including Manuel Hernandes, Captain John Castro and Captain John Flaco. See id. at 152-53. In the San Saba Treaty, the parties expressly agree to and acknowledge the articles of the Council Springs Treaty, dated May 15, 1846. See id. art. II, at 149. It appears that the purpose of the San Saba Treaty was to enable the United States to fulfill its obligations under its Guadalupe-Hidalgo Treaty with Mexico. See id. art. III, at 150.6 The United States agreed that "special care shall then be taken not to place its Indian occupants under the necessity of seeking new homes by committing those invasions which the United States . obligated themselves to restrain." Id. at 151. The signatory chiefs agreed to place themselves under the care and protection of the authorities of the United States and to bind themselves to "comply with the provisions of said treaty between the United States and Mexico." Id. You do not include them with your request, but we are aware of two additional treaties involving the Lipan Indians. On May 15, 1846, at Council Springs, Texas, the United States and the "undersigned Chiefs, Counsellors, and the Warriors of the Comanche, Ioni, Ana- darko, Caddo, Lipan, Longwa, Keechi, Tawakoni, Wichita, and Waco Tribes of Indians" entered into a treaty. 7 It is signed by P. M. Butler and M. G. Lewis for the United States. See Council Springs Treaty, supra note 7, at 49. Although it recites the inclusion of the Lipan Indians, no signatory of the Lipan tribe appears at the end of the treaty. See id. at 49- 51. In it, the representatives of the Indian tribes acknowledged themselves "to be under the protection of the United States, and of no other power, state, or sovereignty whatever." Id. art. I, at 44. In 1850, at Spring Creek, a treaty was entered into between the United States and the Comanche, Caddo, Lipan, Quapaw, Tawakoni, and Waco Tribes. 8It is executed by John H. Rollins for the United States and Chi-ci-to, Chi-po-ti, Ye-keh-tas-na and Keh-rauch on behalf of the Lipan. See Spring Creek Treaty, supra note 8, art. 20th, at 135. Thus, we are aware of five Lipan Indian treaties, listed in chronological order as follows: Live Oak Treaty, 1838; Tehuacana Creek Treaty, 1844; Council Springs Treaty, 1846; Spring Creek Treaty, 1850; and the San Saba Treaty, 1851. I. Abrogation of Indian Treaties "Although all Indian treaties were executed over 100 years ago, unless otherwise modified, these treaties remain in effect." Sally J. Johnson, Honoring Treaty Rights and Conserving Endangered Species after United States v. Dion , 13 Pub. Land L.Rev. 179, 179 (1992) (citing Tsosie v. United States, 825 F.2d 393 (Fed. Cir. 1987)). Pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, see U.S. Const. art. VI, cl. 2, Indian treaties become the law of the land and supersede conflicting state laws or state constitutional provisions. See, e.g., Antoine v. Washington, 420 U.S. 194, 204 (1975); United States v. Forty-Three Gallons of Whiskey, 93 U.S. 188, 196 (1876). Although Congress may not impair rights vested under Indian treaties, it may supersede or abrogate the treaties by legislation or subsequent treaty. See South Dakota v. Bourland, 508 U.S. 679, 687 (1993); Reich v. Great Lakes Indian Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 4 F.3d 490, 493 (7th Cir. 1993); United States v. Sohappy, 770 F.2d 816, 818 (9th Cir. 1985); Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co., 67 F. Supp. 2d 424, 459-60 (D. N.J. 1999); United States v. Michigan, 471 F. Supp. 192, 253 (W. D. Mich. 1979). An intent to abrogate treaty rights must be expressed clearly and unequivocally, but need not be explicit where it is clear. See United States v. Dion, 476 U.S. 734, 739-40 (1986). A later statute or treaty must be harmonized with existing treaties to the extent possible. See Menominee Tribe v. United States, 391 U.S. 404, 411 (1968). However, "when a subsequent inconsistent law cannot be reconciled with a prior treaty, the subsequent law is deemed to abrogate the treaty to the extent of the inconsistency, without specific words of abrogation." Iwanowa, 67 F. Supp. 2d at 459 (citing Breard v. Greene, 523 U.S. 371, 376 (1998)). Similarly, where there is an irreconcilable conflict between a subsequent treaty and a prior treaty, the new treaty abrogates the prior inconsistent treaty or provision therein. See id.; see also Whitney v. Robertson, 124 U.S. 190, 194 (1888) ("When the two [treaties] relate to the same subject [and] . are inconsistent, the last one in date will control the other."); Farrell v. United States , 110 F. 942, 951 (8th Cir. 1901). It is important to note here that the Live Oak Treaty is essentially a pledge of perpetual friendship between the Republic of Texas and the Lipan Indians. See Live Oak Treaty, supra note 4, at 30. While it does contain some specific provisions, the Live Oak Treaty and the four subsequent treaties we examine do not relate to or establish rights to any piece or tract of land, uses of land, or particular rights that stem from the land, such as the usufructuary rights of hunting and fishing. In most instances where a court considers a treaty, a particular right guaranteed or bestowed by the treaty is the issue. The question of whether a treaty has been abrogated in such instances, then, is whether a subsequent legislative act or treaty interfered with the right protected or bestowed in the prior treaty as to render the prior right void. If so, the particular right, not the whole treaty, is considered abrogated. You do not inquire about a particular aspect of, or right bestowed in, the Live Oak Treaty. See generally Request Letter, supra note 3. Instead, you ask us to opine on the wholesale validity of the entire treaty. See id. We have found no case from the federal courts that engages in that task. However, utilizing the abrogation principles recited above, we endeavor to answer your question as we think the federal courts would answer it. II. Analysis Legislation or a subsequent treaty may result in the abrogation of a treaty. See Kansas or Kaw Tribe v. United States, 80 Ct. Cl. 264, 304 (1934). "[C]ourts must construe successive treaties in conjunction with the language of earlier treaties." Menominee Indian Tribe v. Thompson, 161 F.3d 449, 457 (7th Cir. 1998) (citing Oregon Dep't of Fish & Wildlife v. Klamath Indian Tribe, 473 U.S. 753, 768 (1985) and Confederated Bands of Ute Indians v. United States , 330 U.S. 169, 176-80 (1947)). Here, you inquire about a treaty executed in 1838. The Live Oak Treaty is followed in time by four treaties made by the same tribe. Therefore, we will examine the provisions of each of those treaties to determine if the Live Oak Treaty is abrogated by a subsequent treaty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of the Taovaya [Wichita]
    THE STORY OF THE TAOVAYA [WICHITA] Home Page (Images Sources): • “Coahuiltecans;” painting from The University of Texas at Austin, College of Liberal Arts; www.texasbeyondhistory.net/st-plains/peoples/coahuiltecans.html • “Wichita Lodge, Thatched with Prairie Grass;” oil painting on canvas by George Catlin, 1834-1835; Smithsonian American Art Museum; 1985.66.492. • “Buffalo Hunt on the Southwestern Plains;” oil painting by John Mix Stanley, 1845; Smithsonian American Art Museum; 1985.66.248,932. • “Peeling Pumpkins;” Photogravure by Edward S. Curtis; 1927; The North American Indian (1907-1930); v. 19; The University Press, Cambridge, Mass; 1930; facing page 50. 1-7: Before the Taovaya (Image Sources): • “Coahuiltecans;” painting from The University of Texas at Austin, College of Liberal Arts; www.texasbeyondhistory.net/st-plains/peoples/coahuiltecans.html • “Central Texas Chronology;” Gault School of Archaeology website: www.gaultschool.org/history/peopling-americas-timeline. Retrieved January 16, 2018. • Terminology Charts from Lithics-Net website: www.lithicsnet.com/lithinfo.html. Retrieved January 17, 2018. • “Hunting the Woolly Mammoth;” Wikipedia.org: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hunting_Woolly_Mammoth.jpg. Retrieved January 16, 2018. • “Atlatl;” Encyclopedia Britannica; Native Languages of the Americase website: www.native-languages.org/weapons.htm. Retrieved January 19, 2018. • “A mano and metate in use;” Texas Beyond History website: https://www.texasbeyondhistory.net/kids/dinner/kitchen.html. Retrieved January 18, 2018. • “Rock Art in Seminole Canyon State Park & Historic Site;” Texas Parks & Wildlife website: https://tpwd.texas.gov/state-parks/seminole-canyon. Retrieved January 16, 2018. • “Buffalo Herd;” photograph in the Tales ‘N’ Trails Museum photo; Joe Benton Collection. A1-A6: History of the Taovaya (Image Sources): • “Wichita Village on Rush Creek;” Lithograph by James Ackerman; 1854.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections
    University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections C. Ross Hume Collection Hume, Carleton Ross (1878–1960). Papers, 1838–1948. 10.50 feet. Attorney. Personal and business correspondence (1893–1948) relating to Hume’s family, his attendance at the University of Oklahoma, his contact with the university as an alumnus, and his law practice as an attorney for the Caddo Indians. Also included are numerous legal documents (1838–1948) relating to Indian claims and the Indians of Oklahoma, the Shirley Trading Post, the Anadarko, Oklahoma, area and the University of Oklahoma. ___________ Biographical Note: Carleton Ross Hume, who along with Roy P. Stoops made up the first graduating class of the University of Oklahoma in 1898. He was born at Tontogany, Ohio, in 1878. He was the son of Charles Robinson Hume and Annette Ross Hume. The Humes moved to Anadarko, Oklahoma Territory, in December of 1890, when Dr. Hume was appointed as government physician to the Anadarko Indian Agency. C. Ross Hume later served as attorney for the Caddo Nation, and a judge in Anadarko. Box 1 Native American Tribal Materials Apaches (1925-26) 1. Legal inquiry concerning an Apache woman Various Individual claims- includes letter to Hume from Sen. E. Thomas Folder of Clippings Cherokees 2. Power of Attorney Notes on Sequoyah Treaties with Republic of Texas (1836 and 1837) Cherokee Indians' Claim Texas Land Research notes - secondary sources Cheyennes 3. Historical notes including origins, dates of wars, movements, etc. 47th Congress, 1st session -1882. Message from the President of the United States. Confirmation of Certain Land in Indian Territory to Cheyenne and Arapahoe Indians Comanches 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caddo After Europeans
    Volume 2016 Article 91 2016 Reaping the Whirlwind: The Caddo after Europeans Timothy K. Perttula Heritage Research Center, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Robert Cast Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K. and Cast, Robert (2016) "Reaping the Whirlwind: The Caddo after Europeans," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2016, Article 91. https://doi.org/10.21112/.ita.2016.1.91 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2016/iss1/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reaping the Whirlwind: The Caddo after Europeans Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2016/iss1/91
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    ______________________________ Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE GUIDE TO CAMPING . 2 THE SCOUT LAW . 3 THE SCOUT OATH . 3 THE OUTDOOR CODE . 4 LEAVE NO TRACE . 4 TREAD LIGHTLY! . 4 SOUTHERN REGION 3 (SR-3) ADDRESSES . 5 WHERE TO GO CAMPING BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – TEXAS . 6 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – ARKANSAS . 7 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – COLORADO. 7 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – LOUISIANA . 7 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – NEW MEXICO . 8 BOY SCOUT COUNCIL SUMMER CAMPS – OKLAHOMA . 8 BSA PROPERTIES - OTHER COUNCIL PROPERTIES . 9 BSA PROPERTIES – HIGH ADVENTURE (LAND ORIENTED) . 10 BSA PROPERTIES – HIGH ADVENTURE (WATER ORIENTED). 12 NATIONAL PARKS/FEDERAL LANDS IN TEXAS . 13 TEXAS STATE PARKS. 14 CORP OF ENGINEER LAKES – CENTRAL TEXAS . 19 LCRA PARKS/CAMPGROUNDS. 19 OTHER CAMPGROUNDS IN CENTRAL TEXAS . 20 1 Tonkawa Lodge 99 * 2019 Edition * Capitol Area Council __________________________________ Introduction A purpose of the Order of the Arrow is to “promote camping, responsible outdoor adventure, and environmental stewardship as essential components of every Scout’s experience, in the unit, year-round, and in summer camp.” Camping and outdoor adventure are at the heart of the purpose of the Order of the Arrow. Camping and the outdoor adventure are at the core of the mission of Scouting. It is with this focus that the Arrowmen of Tonkawa Lodge 99 present this revised camping guide to the units of our council and any units who are looking to discover new opportunities for camping and exploration. This revision updates some of the changes that have occurred in Scouting, revises outdated information, and provides new locations for camping and outdoor adventures.
    [Show full text]
  • At Lake Tawakoni on the Sabine River, Rains County, Texas
    Volume 2019 Article 34 2019 The Pearson Site (41RA5) at Lake Tawakoni on the Sabine River, Rains County, Texas Timothy K. Perttula [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Perttula, Timothy K. (2019) "The Pearson Site (41RA5) at Lake Tawakoni on the Sabine River, Rains County, Texas," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2019, Article 34. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.2019.1.34 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2019/iss1/34 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Pearson Site (41RA5) at Lake Tawakoni on the Sabine River, Rains County, Texas Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2019/iss1/34 The Pearson Site (41RA5) at Lake Tawakoni on the Sabine River, Rains County, Texas Timothy K.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal #4226
    Journal #4226 from sdc 8.21.18 Wisconsin Reservation Offers A Climate Success Story And A Warning Federal Water Tap GrantStation NYU will offer free tuition to all medical students Youth Neighborhood Association Partnership Program Grant Applications Now Open Climate Defenders Mobilizing for 3rd People’s Climate March How teen activists are using fashion, tech to register thousands of voters How This Native American Fashion Designer Uses Art and Activism To Inspire Her Work Judge Orders Full Environmental Review of Keystone XL in Nebraska Oklahoma Resources Giant Turtle Tortue Wisconsin Reservation Offers A Climate Success Story And A Warning NPR Climate change is causing more severe flooding around the country, and a disproportionate number of Native American communities are on the front lines. Read the full story ****************************************************************************** Federal Water Tap: “As administrations change, so do regulatory priorities. But the requirements of the [Administrative Procedure Act] remain the same. The court finds that the government failed to comply with these requirements in implementing the Suspension Rule.” — U.S. District Judge David Norton, ruling that the Environmental Protection Agency failed to follow the rules when it suspended the Clean Water Rule earlier this year. Norton’s injunction reinstated the rule in 26 states. District Judge Reinstates Clean Water Rule A U.S. District Court judge in South Carolina concluded that the Environmental Protection Agency did not follow proper procedures when it suspended a rule that determines which waterways are protected by the Clean Water Act. Judge David Norton, a George W. Bush appointee, agreed with the conservation groups that brought lawsuit that the EPA failed to take public comment on the proposal and consider the consequences of suspending the Clean Water Rule, also known as WOTUS.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Archives Microfilm Guide Series 9: Kiowa Agency Records
    Indian Archives Microfilm Guide Series 9: Kiowa Agency Records Compiled by Katie Bush Series 9: Kiowa Agency Records Table of Contents Census and Enrollment p. 3, 49 Kiowa Agency Records Letterpress Books p. 7, 36 Federal, State, and Local Court Relations p. 22 Foreign Relations p. 26 Military Relations and Affairs p. 27 Indian History, Culture, and Acculturation p. 33 Estates, Births, Marriages, Divorces, Deaths, Wills, and Related Records p. 35 Cattle, Grazing, and Pastures p. 41 Fences, Boundary Lines, and Homesteads p. 43 Intruders and Roads p. 43 Field Matrons p. 43 Traders p. 44 Commissioner of Indian Affairs, Letters Received p. 46 Schools p. 50 Farmers p. 52 Issues p. 55 Fort Sill Indian School Records p. 63 Series 9: Kiowa Agency Records (includes Comanche, Apache, and other various tribes) Introduction The treaty of Medicine Lodge Creek, Kansas (15 Stat., 581 and 15 Stat., 589) concluded on Oct. 21, 1868 between the United States and the Kiowa, Comanche, and Kiowa Apache provided for a reservation in Indian Territory to be located between the Washita and Red Rivers. This was a modification and reduction of a reservation established by a treaty of Oct. 18, 1865 (Stat. L xiv 717) with the Comanche and Kiowa. In 1868 A. G. Boone, Special Agent to the Kiowas and Comanches, and Pvt. Maj. Gen. W. B. Hazen were sent to Indian Territory to bring together the Kiowas, Comanches, and Apaches who wished to abide by their treaty commitments. Progress was made and the following year Boone’s successor, Laurie Tatum, arrived at agency headquarters near Fort Sill.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Indian Country Guide in This Edition of Newspapers in Education
    he American Indian Cultural Center and Museum (AICCM) is honored Halito! Oklahoma has a unique history that differentiates it from any other Tto present, in partnership with Newspapers In Education at The Oklahoman, state in the nation. Nowhere else in the United States can a visitor hear first the Native American Heritage educational workbook. Workbooks focus on hand-accounts from 39 different American Indian Tribal Nations regarding the cultures, histories and governments of the American Indian tribes of their journey from ancestral homelands, or discover how Native peoples have Oklahoma. The workbooks are published twice a year, around November contributed and woven their identities into the fabric of contemporary Oklahoma. and April. Each workbook is organized into four core thematic areas: Origins, Oklahoma is deeply rooted in American Indian history and heritage. We hope Native Knowledge, Community and Governance. Because it is impossible you will use this guide to explore our great state and to learn about Okla- to cover every aspect of the topics featured in each edition, we hope the Humma. (“Red People” in the Choctaw language.)–Gena Timberman, Esq., workbooks will comprehensively introduce students to a variety of new subjects and ideas. We hope you will be inspired to research and find out more information with the help of your teachers and parents as well as through your own independent research. The American Indian Cultural Center and Museum would like to give special thanks to the Oklahoma Tourism & Recreation Department for generously permitting us to share information featured in the Oklahoma Indian Country Guide in this edition of Newspapers in Education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Removal of the Creek Indians from the Southeast, 1825-1838
    THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this dissertation is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This dissertation does not include proprietary or classified information. ____________________________ Christopher D. Haveman Certificate of Approval: ____________________________ ____________________________ Kenneth W. Noe Kathryn E. Holland Braund, Chair Professor Professor History History ____________________________ ____________________________ David C. Carter John Saye Professor Professor History Education ____________________________ George T. Flowers Dean Graduate School THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 10, 2009 THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this dissertation at its discretion, upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. ________________________________ Signature of Author ________________________________ Date of Graduation iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT THE REMOVAL OF THE CREEK INDIANS FROM THE SOUTHEAST, 1825-1838 Christopher D. Haveman Doctor of Philosophy, August 10, 2009 (M.A. Auburn University, 2006) (M.A. Marquette University, 2001) (B.A. Western Washington University, 1998) 407 Typed Pages Directed by Kathryn E. Holland Braund This dissertation examines the removal of approximately twenty-three thousand Creek Indians from Alabama and Georgia to present-day Oklahoma between 1825 and 1838. At its height, the Creek Nation encompassed most of the present-day states of Alabama, Georgia, and Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Plains Region
    Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives Arkansas Kansas Missouri Oklahoma Introduction Introduction Introduction Introduction Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Delegates from 34 tribes in front of Creek Council House, Indian Joseph Matthews, Osage council member, author, historian, and Territory, 1880. National Archives. Rhodes Scholar, seated at home in front of his fireplace, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/519141 Oklahoma. December 16, 1937. National Archives. https://www.archives.gov/research/native- americans/pictures/select-list-082.html National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Arkansas Native Communities There was a great deal movement of Native People from, to and across Arkansas in the early nineteenth century. Therefore, in order to perform a simple search of the GENERAL records of Arkansas’ Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog it is best to focus on National Park Service historic place applications, Osage and Quapaw records before 1824, and records of the Five Civilized Tribes as they traveled across Arkansas. Use the following search terms: Removal (Advanced Search, using Record Group 75) and “Arkansas Indian” (include quotation marks). The much broader search, Arkansas Indian, will have to be narrowed further by date range and document type. There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of Arkansas, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Bosque County, Texas (Unpublished Master's Thesis), University of Texas Library, Austin
    A History of Texas BY William C. Pool Basque County, Texas William C.' Pool Y ILLUS,FILAnLINS BY THE AUTHOR t.0~c $22 SAN MARCOS RECORD PRESS San Marcos, 1914 TO MARY RUTH AND HER GRANDPARENTS Copyright 1954 By WILLIAM C. POOL PREFACE In 1904 the people of Bosque County gathered on the lawn of the old Emerson Hotel at Meridian to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the or- ganization of the county. On this occasion two young Meridian attorneys -Hugh J. and Calvin M. Cureton-read a paper entitled Sketch of the Early History of Bosque County. This rare historical narrative was pub- lished by the Meridian Tribune. A half a century has passed since publica- tion of the Cureton pamphlet; yet it remains the only printed work on the history of the county. In addition to the Cureton story, articles relative to the history of the lands along the Bosque have appeared from time to time in the newspapers of Texas and at least three research projects on Bosque subjects are buried deep in the unread manuscripts that represent theses for the Master of Arts degree at the University of Texas. The intent of this study is to relate the history of the settlements in Bosque County between the years 1850 and 1954. After a summary of the geographical and geological features of the Bosque region, a brief backpound of the Sterling C. Robertson colony and early history of Milam County is presented as a background to the progress of the central Texas frontier. Permanent settlement in Bosque County dates from the year 1850, Ihe year that Albert Barton and Ewe11 Everett brought their families to the hither edge of what was then McLennan County.
    [Show full text]
  • Homelands of Some of the Many Tribes That Settled in the State. the Historical Development and Establishment of Indian Settlements Within the State Are Outlined
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 028 864 RC 003 359 Indians of Oklahoma. Bureau of Indian Affairs (Dept. of Interior), Washington, D.C. Pub Date 68 Note-19p. Available from-Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (0-287-162, $0.15). EMS Price MF-S0.25 HC Not Available from EDRS. Descriptors-*AmericanIndians,CollectiveSettlements,*CulturalBackground,FederalAid,*Federal Legislation, Federal Programs, Historical Reviews, History, Land Use, *Migration Patterns, *United States History Identifiers-Apaches, Cherokees, Cheyennes, Chippewas, Choctaws, Comanches, Creeks, *Oklahoma, Osage& Shawnees Oklahoma's present-day Indian culture and civilization, it is noted, are very much pronounced, with more than 68 tribes still proudly embracing their identities. Oklahoma is shown to be the melting pot of Indian America on a map indicating the original homelands of some of the many tribes that settled in the State. The historical development and establishment of Indian settlements within the State are outlined. A listing of Indian tribes represented in Oklahoma, a discussion of Oklahoma Indians today and Federal programs for Indians, and a list of places of interest are also included. (SW) , Ira. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION& WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE 'PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION .POSITION OR POLICY. " Owe t4 MOVEMENT OF INDIAN TRIBES INTO OKLAHOMA orAWA ,...._ / / vroktiodt i . Ic' 1._ ARAMHO A 2/ 1 ) t 1 CHEYENNE t FOX , 0 1 SAC s I r POTAWA71II, t PAWNei.... KASKASKIA , I ....
    [Show full text]