ART. XVI.— the Early Commerce of Babylon with India— 700-300 B.C
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
JOURNAL THE EOYAL ASIATIC SOCIETY. ART. XVI.— The Early Commerce of Babylon with India— 700-300 B.C. By J. KENNEDY. LETTERS and coinage are the natural fruits of commerce. Scholars agree that the Indian or Brahma alphabet had a Western origin, and owed its existence to commercial exigencies. But while Hofrath Dr. Biihler traces it to a Phoenician source, and ascribes its creation to the early part of the eight century B.C., M. Halevy derives it from an Aramaean script in the time of Alexander the Great1 No such definite theory has been put forward with regard to the silver coins called puranas, the most ancient coins of India ; but it is generally believed that they were current before the Macedonian invasion, and, as silver has always been one of the most important of the imports from the West into India, we should naturally suppose that silver coinage came also from the West—unless, indeed, it were an indigenous invention.2 In the case, then, both of Indian letters and of Indian coinage, a direct and constant inter- course with Western Asia is the presupposition of every solution. ' Now, for a trade between Western Asia and 1 Vide Dr. Cust's interesting paper on the "Origin of the Phoenician and Indian Alphabets," J.R.A.S., January, 1897, pp. 62-5. 2 On the antiquity of the puranas, vide " Coins of Ancient India," by Sir A. Cunningham, pp. 52-3. London, 1891. J.B.A.S. 1898. • 16 Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. UCL, Institute of Education, on 08 Apr 2017 at 14:45:11, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X0002520X 242 EARLY COMMERCE OF BABYLON WITH INDIA. India three routes are possible. The first climbs up the precipitous and zigzag passes of the Zagros range—which the Greeks called "ladders"—into the treeless regions of Persia. This route was barred for centuries by the in- veterate hostility of the mountaineers, and it did not become practicable until the " Great King" reduced the Kurdish highlanders and the lowland Semites to an equal vassalage. The second route traverses the mountains of Armenia to the Caspian and Oxus, and descends into India by the passes of the Hindoo Kush. Articles of commerce doubt- less passed along this way from early times; but the trade was of little importance, fitful, intermittent, and passing through many intermediate hands, until the Parthian domination forced trade into this channel. Lastly, there is the sea; and, as this alone afforded a means of direct and constant intercourse, the question is narrowed to a single issue : at what period did regular maritime inter- course first arise between India and Western Asia ? From the remotest ages, we generally assume. But this was not the case. On the contrary, I think it can be demonstrated that it arose at the commencement of the seventh century B.C. I propose to show (1) that the early commerce of Egyptians, Babylonians, and Arabs in the Eastern seas did not embrace India, and that the reasons usually adduced for a contrary opinion are invalid. (2) I shall show, from the history of the Chinese coinage, that an active sea-trade sprang up about 700 B.C. between Babylon and the East, and that India had an active share in it. From the time of Darius Hystaspes (tired. 500 B.C.) the Babylonians lost their mono- poly, and the traffic with Babylon, although never quite extinct, passed largely into the hands of the Arabs, whom the t3reeks found in possession. (3) These facts have an important bearing on the history of Indian letters and coinage. If my premises be granted, we can hardly date the invention of the Indian alphabet much before or much after 600 B.C. And, with regard to the purana coinage, I hope to show that it represents a system of private coinage, and is identical (so far as one can judge in the Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. UCL, Institute of Education, on 08 Apr 2017 at 14:45:11, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X0002520X EARLY COMMERCE OF BABYLON WITH INDIA. 243 absence of specimens) with the private currency system obtaining at Babylon in the days of Darius Hystaspes. (4) Certain features of Indian art inexplicable through the medium of Persia, and probably not indigenous, may be explained as traces and survivals of Babylonian influence. I. Few coasts are more forbidding than the barren shores of the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. Dark and serrated mountain ranges, glowing with heat and devoid of life, alternate with stretches of burning sand; sunken reefs and coral rocks prevent a near approach to the shore; and the havens are infrequent and often insecure. Contrary winds blow from either end of the Red Sea throughout the year; storms beset the entrance to the Persian Gulf; the tides are violent and the seas dangerous. And yet, along these shores, where all life appears to be lost in an immensity of desolation, the earliest maritime commerce of the world was carried on. Tradition said that the holy city of Eridu had received the first elements of civilization from the sea; and the Egyptians believed that the " followers of Horus " had migrated from Pun to Egypt along the Red Sea littoral. At the commencement of the third millennium B.C. we find, the priest-kings of Lagash1 obtaining valuable woods and stones by sea from the lands of Magan and Malukhkha2— countries through which Assurbanipal passed on his way to invade Egypt, and which the majority of scholars identify with the Sinaitic Peninsula. The statue of one of these priest-kings, Gudea by name, furnishes a most convincing proof of the intimate maritime relations between Babylonia and Egypt. The statue is of diorite, and was executed by 1 Better known by its modern name of Tell-loh. The civil name was Shirpurla, the sacred name Lagash. It was situated on a canal not far from the ancient course, and near the mouth of the Tigris. 2 On Magan and Malukhkha, vide Sayce, Hibbert Lectures, 1887: " Lectures on the Religion of the Ancient Babylonians," pp. 31-2. (London, 188tf.) Malukhkha is the district to the south of the Wadi-el-'Arish. Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. UCL, Institute of Education, on 08 Apr 2017 at 14:45:11, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X0002520X 244 EARLY COMMERCE OP BABYLON WITH INDIA. a local artist; but it is copied closely, almost slavishly, in figure, dress, and attitude, from the Egyptian type which the famous diorite statue of King Cephren in the Ghizeh Museum has made classical. The king holds on his lap a map, and on the map is marked a scale with bevelled edge, which Professor Petrie has identified with the Egyptian cubit.1 The timber and the diorite were furnished to Gudea by trading-ships from Magan and Malukhkha, Nituk and Gubi.2 Magan and Malukhkha represent the Sinaitic Peninsula; Nituk is the island of Bahrein, half-way down the Persian Gulf;3 and Sir H. Eawlinson identifies Gubi with Koptos. The identification is doubtful, but the in- scriptions of the Wadi Hamraamat on the road from Koptos to Kosseir show the efforts of the Pharaohs from the time of Assa, of the fifth dynasty (circd 3580-3536 B.C.), to keep open the communications with the Red Sea.4 Indeed, the earliest proof we possess of a trade by way of the Red Sea dates from this same Assa, who imported a Deng or pigmy from the land of Punt in South Arabia,5 S-ankh-ka-ra (circd 2786-2778 B.C.), the last king of the eleventh dynasty, attempted to reduce the tribes on the Abyssinian coast under the suzerainty of Egypt by means of a fleet, and to secure the safety of the watering stations.6 But this solitary expedition had probably little effect. It was the work of the great Queen Hat-sheps-ut (1516- 1481 B.C.) first to extend the sphere of Egyptian influence along the entire African coast as far as the vicinity of Cape 1 Sayce, Hibbert Lectures, 1887, p. 137. The statue is in the Louvre, and a east of it in the British Museum. 2 Gudea's inscriptions are translated in De Sarzec's magnificent "Decou- vertes en Chaldee," and in " Records of the Past," N.s., vol. ii, pp. 80-2. 3 " Niduk-ki in Accadian, and Tilvun or Tilmun in Assyrian, unquestionably applie3 to Bahrein."—Sir H. Eawlinson, J.R.A.S. 1880, vol. xii, p. 212. 4 W. M. Flinders Petrie, "A History of Egypt," vol. i, p. 79. London, 1894. 5 Petrie, "History of Egypt," vol. i, p. 100. Cf. Budge, "Book of the Dead: Papyrus of Ani," Jntrod., xxv. 6 Maspero gives a full account of the maritime expeditions of the Pharaohs from the eleventh to the twentieth dynasty in his essay ".Navigations des E'gyptiens" : Revue Historique, vol. ix, 1879. Downloaded from https:/www.cambridge.org/core. UCL, Institute of Education, on 08 Apr 2017 at 14:45:11, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X0002520X EARLY COMMERCE OF BABYLON WITH INDIA. 245 Guardafui. The exquisite bas-reliefs on the walls of her temple at Deir-ul-Bahri still preserve the memory of that smallest of all great expeditions.