DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Human Future Safe Water for All

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Human Future Safe Water for All Water Human Future Safe Water for All Japan International Cooperation Agency 1-6th floor, Nibancho Center Building, 5-25, Niban-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8012, japan Tel: +81-3-5226-6660~6663 URL:http://www.jica.go.jp 2015・3 Capacity Development Safe and Stable Water Supply and in the Water Sector Improvement of Sanitation for the Enhancement of Human Security Supplying water and sanitation through community participation (Rural water supply and sanitation) Lack of access to safe water is an impediment to the progress of public health, educa- tion and poverty reduction for many people around the world. Contaminated water and lack of hygiene practices, such as washing hands and using toilets, expose people in developing countries to the risk of waterborne diseases. In addition, natural disasters, such as floods and droughts, have become increasingly serious threats in recent years. Solving such water-related issues is essential for allowing people to escape the pov- erty trap and for enhancing human security. In order to develop a system to effectively manage water resources and to ensure access to stable, equitable and safe water for people, using the capacity development (CD) approach is an important strategy. With the CD approach, JICA has been cooperating with partner countries and their communi- ties to strengthen the capacity of individuals, organiza- tions, institutions and societies. ■Institutional and social level JICA places importance on the sharing of experience ■Organizational level and information gained in the field. We take into ac- count the needs on the ground of each individual ■Individual level country while cooperating with institutions that include government agencies and other public entities. This Three layers of capacity development knowledge sharing comes not only from Japan, but Source：JICA (2004) also from neighboring countries. http://www.jica.go.jp/english/publications/reports/study/capacity/200403/pdf/200403.pdf Given that many developing countries are situated in areas vulnerable to climate change, JICA supports the following water-related measures: (1) Introduce integrated water resources management in the region, reduce climate risks and promote sustainable water resources management. (2) In areas with a higher risk of floods and other disasters, consider prevention mea- People in many villages in developing countries JICA places great importance on conducting social sures according to local conditions. have been trying hard to meet their daily water surveys to grasp the real needs of communities, (3) In areas where the risk of drought is expected to increase, accelerate implementa- needs, but without proper water supply facilities. establishing water-user groups, building the capacity tion of water supply measures. They are often faced with a choice of whether to of communities to maintain water facilities and pro- carry clean water from a source far from their com- viding education on hygiene. (4) Design projects/programs in view of climate risks. munities or to fetch water available near at hand, JICA also develops the capacity of central and local which might possibly be contaminated. Residents governments involved in rural water supply in pre- ■JICA’s approach As water resource problems are have little knowledge about hygiene and sanitation paring for serious breakdowns that communities becoming more critical, JICA has and are frequently affected by waterborne diseases. cannot cope with, and thereby ensures the sustain- established a development strategy with four objectives in taking the ability of projects. initiative to solve global water prob- In addition, children lose opportunities to go to lems. These objectives are: (1) to school because of water-fetching responsibilities. provide a safe and stable water ◯Ｃ CTII supply and improved sanitation; (2) to Water scarcity in the dry season brings a great finan- enhance flood control to protect lives Safe and stable water supply and Improvement of flood management to improvement of sanitation protect lives and property cial burden to poor households because they have to and property; (3) to conserve the water environment; and (4) to purchase expensive drinking water. Access to safe promote integrated water resources water is one of the most critical issues to ensure management. escaping from the poverty trap. Presented here are case studies of JICA’ s contributions to the CD of institutional systems, organizations JICA provides assistance in improving water sup- and individuals in relation to the four plies and sanitation in rural areas through commu- objectives of the development strat- nity participation, making communities the main egy mentioned above. Water environment preservation Integrated water resources management players in development. 1 2 Safe and Stable Water Supply and Improvement of Sanitation Supplying water and sanitation through community participation (Rural water supply and sanitation) ■Assistance for Senegal As a long-term development partner of Senegal, Japan lead them to have less interest in the ASUFOR and fewer Two new projects were formulated from the community workers, and the next step is the training of village water has provided financial and technical assistance in rural payments for the water tariff. Thus, in the project, a rule development through water management activities based committee members by skilled extension workers. After water supply for decades, with the construction and ser- was set that at least one post should be allocated to each on ASUFORs. One, in the water supply sector, was the the training activities, water committee members started vicing of more than 120 motor pump water supply sys- tribe, including pastoral people who do not even reside Project for Sustainable Rural Development (March 2008 to improve the hygiene environment around water facili- tems. This is equivalent to over 10% of facilities in the permanently in one community. to January 2011), in which ASUFORs invested their sur- ties through exchanges of opinions with villagers. Their whole nation, enabling 350,000 people in rural areas to plus funds in community agricultural activities that efforts are to construct infiltration and fences around access potable water and 600,000 domestic animals to be The third aspect was gender. Fetching water is a role showed the potential for improving incomes and quality of water facilities, upgrade account-recording systems and fed, in terms of constant secured water. While hardware is assigned to women, and the workload directly affects life. The other project, in the sanitation sector, is the Proj- collect water tariffs. built progressively, soft them. Consequently, women benefit more than men from ect for Sanitation and Hygiene Improvement in Rural The results of monitoring conducted after these activities components such as the maintenance of the facilities. Women ultimately made up Areas of Tambacounda, Kedougou and Matam Regions show that the rate of water tariff collection has been degradation of facilities more than half of the ASUFOR members. (March 2012 to February 2016), in which support for improved to 76% from 40%, and there was an increase in and unreliable operation improving sanitary behavior, the spread of sanitation the number of villages with fences around water facilities, and management systems The fourth aspect was to introduce transparency in facilities and building sanitary systems is extended in which were constructed using collected water tariffs. became challenges. financial management. In the past, water tariffs were col- three target regions. lected but did not last long because of obscure usage. To Another activity contributing to the dissemination of Regarding water avail- amend this system, water tariffs were managed by several Thus, with comprehensive cooperation that includes O&M methods is community radio, which airs interviews ability, the local people, members and there was an obligation to report financial both the construction of facilities and capacity building for with villagers or government officials in charge of water and especially women, status on a regular basis. government officials and local people, JICA implements facilities on specific issues such as “Why does a hand had been facing risks all multilateral support that contributes to access to safe pump malfunction?” and “Why do we have to pay a water the time. For example, With all the above points integrated into project activi- water as well as the management of water supply facili- tariff regularly?” Sharing experiences through community when the pumps or the ties, ASUFORs were successfully established and man- ties, improvement of sanitation and hygiene, community radio contributes to efficiently spreading O&M philoso- generators broke down, aged in a self-sustainable manner. As a result, during the development and improvement of life through ASUFORs. phies. the community had to 2nd Phase period, the government of Senegal institution- present a petition to the alized ASUFORs as a requirement whenever water supply government to fix the facilities are constructed. In addition, the project team ■Assistance for Malawi facilities, with no informa- implemented training programs inviting not only the proj- tion on when they would be fixed because of the limits of ect target areas, but also officers from other regions. This Malawi has around 1,000 mm of precipitation per year, the government’s budget. Sometimes it took more than attempt resulted in the concept becoming pervasive in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flood Management in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins, Indonesia
    Asian Water Cycle Symposium 2016 Tokyo, Japan, 1 - 2 March 2016 FLOOD MANAGEMENT IN THE BRANTAS AND BENGAWAN SOLO RIVER BASINS, INDONESIA Gede Nugroho Ariefianto, M. Zainal Arifin, Fahmi Hidayat, Arief Satria Marsudi Jasa Tirta Public Corporation http://www.jasatirta1.co.id Flood Hazards in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins • Flood continues to be the most severe annual disasters in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins, particularly in the tributaries of the Brantas River basin and the Lower Bengawan Solo River Basin. • The intensity of flood disasters appears to have increased during the past few years due to the impact of urbanization, industrialization, climate change and watershed degradation. • Floods in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins cause devastating losses to human lives and livelihoods, and also seriously impede economic development in East Java Province. Floods in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins in February 2016 Floods in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins in February 2016 Flood Control in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins • Prior to the 1990s, large-scale structural measures were adopted as structural measures for flood control in the basins. • The construction of major dam and reservoirs can lead to better regulation of the flow regime in mainstream of Brantas and Upper Bengawan Solo. • Development of large dams in the Bengawan Solo River basin for flood control encounter social and environmental problems. Flood Control Structures in the Brantas River Basin Flood Control Structures in the Bengawan Solo River Basin Flood Management in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins • Floods can’t be prevented totally in the Brantas and Bengawan Solo River Basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia
    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of Sanitation in Indonesia
    Research Report August 2008 Economic Impacts of Sanitation in Indonesia A five-country study conducted in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, the Philippines, and Vietnam under the Economics of Sanitation Initiative (ESI) Water and Sanitation Program East Asia and the Pacifi c (WSP-EAP) World Bank Offi ce Jakarta Indonesia Stock Exchange Building Tower II/13th Fl. Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 52-53 Jakarta 12190 Indonesia Tel: (62-21) 5299-3003 Fax: (62-21) 5299-3004 Printed in 2008. The volume is a product of World Bank staff and consultants. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement of acceptance of such boundaries. Research Report August 2008 Economic Impacts of Sanitation in Indonesia A fi ve-country study conducted in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, the Philippines, and Vietnam under the Economics of Sanitation Initiative (ESI) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary At 55% in 2004, sanitation coverage in Indonesia is below the regional average for Southeast Asian countries of 67%. Nationwide, sanitation coverage has increased by 9 percentage points since 1990, representing signifi cant progress towards the target of 73% set by the Millennium Development Goal joint water supply and sanitation target.
    [Show full text]
  • Siluriformes, Pangasiidae)
    PANGASIUS BEDADO ROBERTS, 1999: A JUNIOR SYNONYM OF PANGASIUS DJAMBAL BLEEKER, 1846 (SILURIFORMES, PANGASIIDAE) by Rudhy GUSTIANO (1,2), Guy G. TEUGELS †(2) & Laurent POUYAUD (3)* ABSTRACT. - The validities of two nominal pangasiid catfish species, Pangasius djambal and P. bedado were examined based on morphometric, meristic, and biological characters. Metric data were analysed using principal component analysis. Based on our results, we consider P. bedado as a junior synonym of P. djambal. RÉSUMÉ. - Pangasius bedado Roberts, 1999 : un synonyme junior de Pangasius djambal Bleeker, 1846 (Siluriformes, Pangasiidae). La validité de deux espèces nominales de poissons chats Pangasiidae, Pangasius djambal et P. bedado, a été examinée sur la base de caractères morphométriques, méristiques et biologiques. Une analyse en composantes principales a été appliquée sur les données métriques. Nos résultats nous amènent à considérer P. bedado comme synonyme junior de P. djambal. Key words. - Pangasiidae - Pangasius djambal - Pangasius bedado - Biometrics - Synonymy. Pangasiid catfishes are characterized by a laterally com- P. djambal. They distinguished it from other Pangasius spe- pressed body, the presence of two pairs of barbels, the pres- cies by the following characters: rounded or somewhat trun- ence of an adipose fin, dorsal fin with two spines (Teugels, cate (never pointed) snout, palatal teeth with two palatine 1996), and anal fin 1/5 to 1/3 of standard length (Gustiano, patches and a moderately large median vomerine patch (but 2003). They occur in freshwater in Southern and Southeast vomerine patch usually clearly divided into two in juve- Asia. Based on our osteological observations, this family niles), at least some specimens with a marked color pattern forms a monophyletic group diagnosed by: the os parieto- on body and fins, including two stripes on caudal lobes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pollution Index and Carrying Capacity of the Upstream Brantas River
    International Journal of GEOMATE, Sept., 2020, Vol.19, Issue 73, pp. 26 – 32 ISSN: 2186International-2982 (P), 2186-2990 Journal (O), Japan, of GEOMATE,DOI: https://doi.org/10.21660/2020.73.55874 Sept., 2020, Vol.19, Issue 73, pp. 26 – 32 Geotechnique, Construction Materials and Environment THE POLLUTION INDEX AND CARRYING CAPACITY OF THE UPSTREAM BRANTAS RIVER Kustamar1 and *Lies Kurniawati Wulandari1 1Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, National Institute of Technology (ITN) Malang, Indonesia *Corresponding Author, Received: 28 July 2019, Revised: 13 Jan. 2020, Accepted: 17 March 2020 ABSTRACT: River is one of the surface water resources that is often polluted by various human activities. With its dynamic characteristics, a river must be periodically examined to determine its water quality. This study aims to investigate the carrying capacity of the Brantas river in East Java, Indonesia. The observation was done by measuring TSS (Total suspended solid), TDS (Total dissolved solid), and oil and grease in the upstream zone of the Brantas river. This research used a descriptive method. The determination of the research stations was based on the condition of the watershed and its surroundings, assuming that there was a decrease in water quality. The sampling points include Pendem Bridge (1), DAM (local water company) Sengkaling (2), Simpang Remujung Bridge (3), and Samaan District (4). The results demonstrated that the upstream Brantas river at each sampling point had different pollution levels. Generally, the sampling point 1 (Pendem Bridge) was the cleanest zone compared to other sampling points. On the other hand, sampling point 4 (Samaan District) was the most polluted site of the upstream zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Brantas River Basin
    JASA TIRTA I PUBLIC CORPORATION Jalan Surabaya No. 2A Malang 65115 http://www.jasatirta1.co.id IMPROVEMENT OF HYDRO INFORMATION SYSTEM - BRANTAS EXPERIENCE - Presented by : Firman Sarifudin [email protected] Presented at The Collaborative Workshop of Sedimentation and Dam Technology Malang, 18th December 2013 Page 1 Brantas River Basin An archipelago of 13,000 islands – 240 million inhabitants – 5,600 rivers all over the country – divided into 131 river basins – Brantas is one of the strategic river basin of out 33 selected basins (President Decree No. 12/2012). Brantas River Basin (12.000 km2) Length = 320 km Population in CA = 16 million people Brantas River Basin = 25% area of East Java Province GRDP Brantas River Basin = 64 % GRDP in the East Java Province (as of 2009) Page 2 Infrastructures in the Basin Master Plan I Master Plan II Master Plan III Bening Dam (84) (1961 - 1973) (1974 - 1985) (1986 - 2000) Gunungsari B. (81) Waru-Turi B. (92) New Lengkong B (74) Selorejo Dam (72) Menturus R.D (93) Wonorejo Dam (00) Jatimlerek R.D (93) T.Agung Tunnel (91) Lodoyo Dam (83) Wlingi Dam (78) Sutami Dam (72) Lahor Dam (77) SengguruhPage Dam 3 (88) Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) Spiral Brantas River Basin Page 4 Jasa Tirta I Public Corporation PJT-I is a Corporate Type RBO . 2 river basins [Brantas & Bengawan Solo] . Approx. 600 employees . 1200 G-Wh generated energy . 250 million m³ industrial bulk-water . 400 million m³ domestic bulk-water MAIN TASKS MANDATES Jasa Tirta I Public Corporation are Jasa Tirta I Public Corporation is a state- stipulated in the Government Regulation No owned company with a mandate from the 46 of 2010 comprising among others: Government to carry out specific preventive O&M of water infrastructures and management assignments in Brantas and rendering water services.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 APPENDIX 4 BANGLADESH General Information* Main Rivers
    APPENDIX 4 BANGLADESH General Information* Surface area: 143,998 km2 Population (1995): 118,000,000 GDP (1996/1997): US$ 14,000 million Agricultural GDP (1996/1997): US$ 4,508 million Capture Fisheries as % of GDP1: 1.88% Aquaculture as % of GDP1: 2.69% Indicative exchange rate (1999) US$ 1 = Tk 48.5 * FAO World Fisheries Statistics – Country profile, 1999 1 Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission (2005) Main Rivers** Total area Rivers and estuaries 4,047,316 ha Total Length of 700 Rivers 22,155 km The Padma-Ganges and its distribution System Annual catch: 6,489 tonnes (1996-97)3(capture) i) Ganges, Padma 305 km Surface area: 69,481 ha2 Annual catch: 1,641 tonnes2 (1991-92) 50.6 kg/ha2 (1991-92) 0.34% contribution to production2 (1991-92) ii) Mathabhanga 128 km iii) Ichhamati 285 km iv) Bhairab 559 km v) Kumar 443 km vi) Kobadak 280 km vii) Chitra 188 km viii) Nabaganga 210 km ix) Garai, Madhumati 314 km x) Arial Khan 266 km The Meghna and Surma System Surface area: 73,999 ha2 Annual catch 84,737 tonnes (1989-90) 54,244 tonnes2 (1991-92) 1,369.60 kg/ ha2 (1991-92) 11.3% contribution to production2 (1991-92) i) Surma 350 km ii) Kushiyara 110 km 1 Jamuna-Brahmaputra System Surface area: 73,666 ha2 Annual catch: 2,280 tonnes (1989-90) i) Brahmaputra 350 km Annual catch: 505 tonnes (1989-90) 391 tonnes2 (1991-92) 0.081% contribution to production2 (1991-92) ii) Jamuna 531 km Annual catch: 1,775 tonnes (1989-90) 2,253 tonnes2 (1991-92) 30.58 kg/ ha2 (1991-92) 0.46% contribution to production2 (1991-92) Other Rivers in West region i) Nagar 238 km ii)
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Geography 2. Socioeconomy
    Chapter 1 The Brantas River Basin 1. Geography (1) Location......................................................,.........................4 (2) Population................................,....................,........................5 (3) Topographyandgeology.............................................................7 (4) Climate..."..".."."........."...........".."."..m."."""....."."....."".9 (5) Rivers..................................................................................11 2. Socioeconomy (1) Society and culture...................................................................I3 (2) Politicsandnationaldefense....................................................,...15 (3) Economy..............................................................................17 (4) Industry..m.",.,........."..""."..,......................"......m..".....""18 3. Brantas Basin Characteristics (1) Watercourseoutline............................,...,........,........................25 (2) Hydrology"".".".."."....."."."""."........"..........."..",".".."".28 (3) Irrigation.,..............,..............................................................30 (4) Rainfallandrunoffcharacteristics..................................................31 (5) Floodwaters ofBrantas'mainstream ............................................33 (6) Eruption of Mount Kelud...""......."........"...""..""".............""..35 Chapter 2 History of Brantas River Basin Development Project 1. Brantas Project Development (1) Overview..............................................................................40
    [Show full text]
  • 5.NARBO Members' Information [PDF/78KB]
    5. NARBO members’ information (1) Jasa Tirta 1 Public Corporation (PJT1) 1) Summary Jasa Tirta I Public Corporation (hereinafter referred to as PJT I) was established based on Government Regulation No. 5 of 1990 and revised by Government Regulation No. 93 of 1999. Then Presidential Decree No.129 of 2000 stipulating additional basin of Bengawan Solo to be managed. The responsibility of PJT I is to manage and conserve the water resources and the infrastructures in the Brantas River and Bengawan Solo River basins for the regional and national development benefit. Main tasks of PJT I are as follows: perform operation and maintenance of the water resources infrastructures, economic dealings in water utilization, river basin management including water resources conservation, development and utilization, and rehabilitation of the water resources infrastructures. PJT I provides the water service (supply) to Municipal Drinking Water Enterprise (PDAM), State Electric Company (PLN), industries, plantation, fisheries, flushing and other utilization. 2) Outline of the organization PJT I was established based on Government Regulation No. 5 of 1990 and revised by Government Regulation No. 93 of 1999. The responsibility of PJT I is to manage and conserve the water resources in the Brantas River and Bengawan Solo River basins for the regional and national development benefit. The purpose and objective of PJT I are to conduct public utilization on water resources in sufficient and high quality manner for fulfilling public needs, and carry out specific tasks given by the Government in performing river basin management and to join national economic development by participating on national development program especially in water resources management sector.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Grave of Troloyo in Trowulan
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 7 No 4 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy July 2016 The Ancient Grave of Troloyo in Trowulan Slamet Sujud Purnawan Jati History Department Universitas Negeri Malang E-mail: [email protected] Deny Yudo Wahyudi History Department Universitas Negeri Malang E-mail: [email protected] Doi:10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n4p512 Abstract This study aims to know the existence of Troloyo grave site background, to reconstruct the ancient of Troloyo grave site, and to explain its cultural continuity. The data were collected through observation, documentation, and interview. This was elaborated by typological, technological, and contextual analyses. The findings are (1) existence of Troloyo grave site as the tombs of Majapahit king’s families shows people’s religion conversion to Islam. The court places the Troloyo into the centre of Islamic community settlement and the centre of Islamic development; (2) the grave site of Troloyo basically is not properly arranged but is distributed into some areas of the bounded fence wall, the covered “cungkup” or the opened grave; (3) the decorated kind and the form of Troloyo Islamic grave depicts a cultural continuity of pre-Islamic period. Keywords: cultural continuity, Islamic grave site, Majapahit 1. Introduction In the context of History of Indonesia periodization, the fifteen and sixteen century is signed by the significant development of the Islamic culture. This period is called by the process of Islamization (Damais, 1995:178). Based on Islamic archaeological remains in East Java, these heritage spreads in the port cities of Majapahit, not only the ports around the north coast of East Java or Brantas River but also the hinterland around the palace of Majapahit.
    [Show full text]
  • 2E Brantas River Basin Development Pianning
    CHAPTER 2 2e Brantas River Basin Development PIanning (1) Hydroelectric power development planning (a) Power situation as of 1961 (year of the first master plan) In 1961 East Java generated a combined power output of 53,250 kW; 31,650 kW out of three hydroelectric power stations and 21,600 kW from four thermal power stations (see Table 2-2). It is estimated that the actual total output was in the range of approximately 35,OOO-40,OOO kW, due to repair or maintenance inspection reasons. All the hydroelectric power stations were located in the Brantas Basin, of which Sengguruh Power Station (2,650 kW) has been taken out of service due to the establishment of the Karangkates Dam. As a result, existing power stations had a total installed capacity of 50,600 kW, excluding the Karangkates Power Station. The annual power consumption in the province, hydroelectric and thermal, increased by about nine times from 22,550,OOO to 202,380,OOO kWh between l928 and 1960 (see Table 2-3). The electrification rate of the Basin soared 709o during these 23 years from 159o in 1970 to 859o in 1993. Just for reference, electrification of Java Island was 769o as of 1993. Table 2-2 Existing power stations in East Java (196i> Powerstation Maximumoutput(kW) Mendalan 20,OOO Hydro Siman 9,OOO Sengguruh 2,650 Subtotal 31,650 Ngagel 6,400 Semampir 12,200 Thermal Malang 1,200 P.A.L. 1,800 Subtotal 21,600 Total 53,250 Table 2-3 Trends in power consumption Unit: 103 kWh Year 1928 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 Powerusage 22,550 61,469 59,935 68,041 79,145 83,127 178,557 202,384 -54- CHAPTER 2 (b) Potential hydropower A survey was made for each master plan on the hydropower potential that could be economically developed in the Basin, the first in (1961), second in (1972), and the third in (1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of River Basin Organization Lessons from UK and USA (Case Study: Indonesia)
    Institutional Arrangement of Integrated River Basin Management: Analysis of River Basin Organization Lessons from UK and USA (Case Study: Indonesia) THESIS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master Degree from University of Groningen and the Master Degree from Institute of Technology Bandung by: FITYAN AONILLAH RUG : S 1623273 ITB : 25405027 DOUBLE MASTER DEGREE PROGRAMME ENVIRONMENTAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING FACULTY OF SPATIAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, PLANNING, AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BANDUNG 2007 i Abstract Existing institutional arrangement of river basin management in Indonesia leads to some problem concerning authority, boundaries, coordination, and integration. Some studies reveal that the problem is also faced by other developing countries in Asian and Latin America. Now Indonesia is trying to reform water sector by issuing new Water Resources Act. In basin level, it will emphasize on institutional and financial framework. This process is pushed by the declining of water resources and government reorganization through decentralization in 2000. There is a plan to reorganize existing institution responsible to river basin management (river basin organization) in order to enhance its environmental and financial performance. This research makes comparative analysis of river basin organization among United Kingdom (UK), United States of America (USA), and Indonesia. It also considers the opportunity to take a lesson from UK and USA experience for Indonesia. UK and USA has long history in dealing with water sector problem including water management at basin level. Many book and studies often use UK and USA as object to be analyzed.
    [Show full text]