DOCSLIB.ORG

Northrop Grumman's LITENING at Targeting System to Be Integrated on F/A-18D Aircraft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northrop Grumman's LITENING at Targeting System to Be Integrated on F/A-18D Aircraft Northrop Grumman's LITENING AT Targeting System to be Integrated on F/A-18D Aircraft March 11, 2004 ROLLING MEADOWS, Ill., March 11, 2004 (PRIMEZONE) -- Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) is supporting the integration of its LITENING AT targeting system onboard U.S. Marine Corps F/A-18D aircraft. LITENING AT is a self-contained, multisensor laser target designating and navigation system that enables fighter pilots to detect, acquire, track and identify ground targets for highly accurate delivery of both conventional and precision-guided weapons. This initiative is being conducted by the U.S. Navy's F/A-18 program office at the Patuxent River Naval Air Station in Lexington Park, Md. LITENING AT features advanced image processing for target identification and coordinate generation, a 640 x 512 pixel forward-looking infrared (FLIR) sensor (first introduced in the LITENING ER variant), charge-coupled device television (CCD-TV) sensors, laser spot tracker/range finder, infrared laser marker; and an infrared laser designator. Northrop Grumman and its teammate RAFAEL Missile Division will work with the Navy, Marine Corps and Boeing Hornet team to direct the LITENING AT for close air support and other combat missions. Previously, this government-industry team performed an initial integration and flight demonstration of Northrop Grumman's LITENING ER targeting system without changing the aircraft's current Advanced Targeting FLIR interfaces. To avoid impacting the aircraft's operational software, all interfaced changes were accomplished in the LITENING's software. These changes were first tested in the F/A-18 system integration lab at the Naval Air Warfare Center in China Lake, Calif., followed by on-aircraft ground checks at the Navy's Patuxent River facility. This was followed by actual test flights, where LITENING successfully tracked targets on a test range using both CCD-TV and FLIR sensors. Additionally, the LITENING laser designator was used to simulate deployment of precision munitions from extended ranges. A similar process will be followed for the current integration of LITENING AT on the F/A-18D prior to operational fielding with Marine Corps Hornets. "Experience with LITENING-equipped AV-8B Harriers during Operation Iraqi Freedom has convinced the Marine Corps of the need to quickly enhance the precision attack capabilities of their Hornets," said Mike Lennon, vice president of Targeting and Surveillance Programs at Northrop Grumman. "This quick turnaround effort will greatly improve the abilities of the F/A 18D to perform close air support and other missions. The Hornet will employ LITENING AT's combat-proven features such as day or night target location and identification, laser spot search/track and laser marker for coordinated operations with ground forces, and precision-target coordinate generation." More than 120 LITENING AT pods or upgrade kits are on order for the Marine Corps and Air National Guard, with additional orders anticipated. LITENING AT's predecessors, LITENING II and LITENING ER, are operational on AV-8Bs flown by the Marine Corps and the Italian and Spanish navies, Air National Guard F-16s and A-10s, Air Force Reserve Command F-16s and B-52s, and Air Force F-15Es. To date, over 248 LITENING pods of all variants have been ordered by U.S. and allied forces. Based in Rolling Meadows, Northrop Grumman's Defensive Systems Division, the division in charge of this LITENING AT initiative, designs, develops and manufactures radio frequency and electro-optic/infrared products that protect military aircraft, ships, satellites and ground vehicles from attack by modern weapons; provide military aircraft with 24-hour targeting and navigation capabilities; ensure high-value, complex, electronic and electro-optical weapons systems are mission-ready; and evaluate defense electronic performance in complex environments. The division is a component of Northrop Grumman's Baltimore, Md.-based Electronic Systems sector, a world leader in the design, development and manufacture of defense and commercial electronic systems including airborne radar, navigation systems, electronic countermeasures, precision weapons, airspace management systems, communications systems, space systems, marine and naval systems, government systems and logistics services. Members of the news media may receive our releases via e-mail by registering at: http://www.northropgrumman.com/cgi-bin/regist_form.cgi LEARN MORE ABOUT US: Northrop Grumman news releases, product information, photos and video clips are available on the Internet at: http://www.northropgrumman.com. Information specific to the Electronic Systems sector is available at: http://www.es.northropgrumman.com /index.html CONTACT: Katie Lamb Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems (847) 259-9600, ext. 3542.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JP 3-09.3, Close Air Support, As a Basis for Conducting CAS
    Joint Publication 3-09.3 Close Air Support 08 July 2009 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides joint doctrine for planning and executing close air support. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis for interagency coordination and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, and subordinate components of these commands, and the Services. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the contents of Service publications, this publication will take precedence unless the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in coordination with the other members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more current and specific guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 HISTORY and DEVELOPMENT of MILITARY LASERS
    History and Development of Military Lasers Chapter 2 HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF MILITARY LASERS JACK B. KELLER, JR* INTRODUCTION INVENTING THE LASER MILITARIZING THE LASER SEARCHING FOR HIGH-ENERGY LASER WEAPONS SEARCHING FOR LOW-ENERGY LASER WEAPONS RETURNING TO HIGHER ENERGIES SUMMARY *Lieutenant Colonel, US Army (Retired); formerly, Foreign Science Information Officer, US Army Medical Research Detachment-Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, 7965 Dave Erwin Drive, Brooks City-Base, Texas 78235 25 Biomedical Implications of Military Laser Exposure INTRODUCTION This chapter will examine the history of the laser, Military advantage is greatest when details are con- from theory to demonstration, for its impact upon the US cealed from real or potential adversaries (eg, through military. In the field of military science, there was early classification). Classification can remain in place long recognition that lasers can be visually and cutaneously after a program is aborted, if warranted to conceal hazardous to military personnel—hazards documented technological details or pathways not obvious or easily in detail elsewhere in this volume—and that such hazards deduced but that may be relevant to future develop- must be mitigated to ensure military personnel safety ments. Thus, many details regarding developmental and mission success. At odds with this recognition was military laser systems cannot be made public; their the desire to harness the laser’s potential application to a descriptions here are necessarily vague. wide spectrum of military tasks. This chapter focuses on Once fielded, system details usually, but not always, the history and development of laser systems that, when become public. Laser systems identified here represent used, necessitate highly specialized biomedical research various evolutionary states of the art in laser technol- as described throughout this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulator and Live Training for Navy Units
    Finding the Right Balance JOHN F. SCHANK • HARRY J. THIE • CLIFFORD M. GRAF II JOSEPH BEEL • JERRY SOLLINGER Simulator and Live Training for Navy Units Prepared for the United States Navy NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE R Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Navy. The research was conducted in RAND’s National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center supported by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the unified commands, and the defense agencies under Contract DASW01-95-C-0059. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Finding the right balance : simulator and live training for navy units / John Schank ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1441.” ISBN 0-8330-3104-X 1. Naval tactics—Study and teaching—United States. 2. Naval tactics—Study and teaching—United States—Simulation methods. 3. Anti-submarine warfare— Study and teaching—United States—Evaluation. 4. Fighter pilots—Training of— Evaluation. 5. Effective teaching—United States. I. Schank, John F. (John Frederic), 1946– II. Rand Corporation. V169 .F53 2002 359.4'071'073—dc21 2001057887 RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. © Copyright 2002 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded April 22, 2006
    SIX DECADES OF GUIDED MUNITIONS AND BATTLE NETWORKS: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS Barry D. Watts Thinking Center for Strategic Smarter and Budgetary Assessments About Defense www.csbaonline.org Six Decades of Guided Munitions and Battle Networks: Progress and Prospects by Barry D. Watts Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments March 2007 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonprofit, public policy research institute established to make clear the inextricable link between near-term and long- range military planning and defense investment strategies. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundations, corporations, government, and individual grants and contributions. This report is one in a series of CSBA analyses on the emerging military revolution. Previous reports in this series include The Military-Technical Revolution: A Preliminary Assessment (2002), Meeting the Anti-Access and Area-Denial Challenge (2003), and The Revolution in War (2004). The first of these, on the military-technical revolution, reproduces the 1992 Pentagon assessment that precipitated the 1990s debate in the United States and abroad over revolutions in military affairs. Many friends and professional colleagues, both within CSBA and outside the Center, have contributed to this report. Those who made the most substantial improvements to the final manuscript are acknowledged below. However, the analysis and findings are solely the responsibility of the author and CSBA. 1667 K Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEGEMENTS .................................................. v SUMMARY ............................................................... ix GLOSSARY ………………………………………………………xix I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1 Guided Munitions: Origins in the 1940s............. 3 Cold War Developments and Prospects ............
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-09.1 Joint Laser Designation Procedures (JLASER)
    JOINT PUB 3-09.1 JOINT LASER DESIGNATION PROCEDURES (JLASER) 1 JUNE 1991 A large body of joint doctrine (and its supporting tactics, techniques, and procedures) has been and is being developed by the US Armed Forces through the combined efforts of the Joint Staff, Services, and combatant commands. The following chart displays an overview of the development process for these publications. MAKING A JOINT PUB ., PROJECT PROPOSAL All joint doctrine and tactics, techniques, and procedures are organized into a comprehensive hierarchy. Joint Pub 3–04 .1 is located in the operations series of joint publications . Joint Pub 1–01, "Joint Publication System, " provides a detailed list of all joint publications. Joint pubs are also available on CD–ROM through the Joint Electronic Library (JEL) . For information, contact : Joint Doctrine Division, J-7, 7000 Joint Staff Pentagon Washington, D. C. 20318–7000 . JOINT LASER DESIGNATION PROCEDURES JOINT PUB 3-09.1 PREFACE 1. Purpose. This publication provides joint procedures for employing laser designators with target acquisition systems and laser-guided weapons to enhance the combat effectiveness of joint US forces. 2. Application a. Procedures established in this publication apply to the commanders of combatant commands, joint task forces, and the subordinate components of these commands. These procedures may also apply when significant forces of one Service are attached to forces of another Service or when significant forces of one Service support forces of another Service, under criteria set forth in this publication. b. In applying the procedures set forth in this publication, care must be taken to distinguish between distinct but related responsibilities in the two channels of authority to forces assigned to combatant commands.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Target Location Error Generated by the Litening Pod As Integrated on the AV-8B Harrier II
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2005 An Analysis of Target Location Error Generated by the Litening Pod as Integrated on the AV-8B Harrier II Shaun C. Spang University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aviation Commons Recommended Citation Spang, Shaun C., "An Analysis of Target Location Error Generated by the Litening Pod as Integrated on the AV-8B Harrier II. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2005. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4597 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Shaun C. Spang entitled "An Analysis of Target Location Error Generated by the Litening Pod as Integrated on the AV-8B Harrier II." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Ralph D. Kimberlin, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Alfonso Pujol, Rodney C. Allison Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Shaun C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory Figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2015. By Aaron M. U. Church, Senior Editor ■ 2016 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT B-1 Lancer Brief: Long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and de- livering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. COMMENTARY The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four proto- types were developed and tested before program cancellation in 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998. Its three internal weapons bays accommodate a substantial payload of weapons, including a mix of different weapons in each bay. Lancer production totaled 100 aircraft. The bomber’s blended wing/ body configuration, variable-geometry design, and turbofan engines provide long range and loiter time. The B-1B has been upgraded with GPS, smart weapons, and mission systems. Offensive avionics include SAR for tracking, B-2A Spirit (SSgt. Jeremy M. Wilson) targeting, and engaging moving vehicles and terrain following. GPS-aided INS lets aircrews autonomously navigate without ground-based navigation aids Dimensions: Span 137 ft (spread forward) to 79 ft (swept aft), length 146 and precisely engage targets. Sniper pod was added in 2008. The ongoing ft, height 34 ft. integrated battle station modifications is the most comprehensive refresh in Weight: Max T-O 477,000 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Weapons Control Specs C M Y K C OUTLOOK/SPECIFICATIONS WEAPONS CONTROL & TARGETING SYSTEMS
    WEAPONS CONTROL & TARGETING SYSTEMS DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION APPLICATIONS REMARKS BAE SYSTEMS, Avionics, Basildon, Essex, England, UK 105H Laser rangefinder Hawk — BAE SYSTEMS, Avionics, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK TIALD Thermal imaging & TV, airborne laser designator Harrier, Jaguar, Tornado — BAE SYSTEMS, BAE Systems Integrated Defense Solutions, Austin, TX, USA Anvis Eyepiece-HUD HUD for helmet-mounted night vision goggles HH-60G — Improved HUD Night vision goggle HUD CH-47F, MH-47E, MH-60, UH-60M Current US Army standard mission equipment. CMC ELECTRONICS, Kanata, Ontario, Canada AIU 6358-140 Armament unit interface Westland Super Lynx 300 Fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft. ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD., Haifa, Israel SMS-86 Stores management system F-4, F-5, F-16 For fighters, trainers, helicopters, transports. ELBIT SYSTEMS LTD., ElOp ElectroOptic Industries Ltd., Rehovot, Israel AMPS Advanced multisensor payload system King Air B200 For long-range target intelligence-gathering. Compass Compact, multipurpose, EO, advanced, stabilized system Bell 212, Cheetah, Panther Other helos, UAVs. Night/day scanning, tracking, aiming, targeting. ELTA SYSTEMS LTD., Ashdod, Israel EL/M-2080 "Green Pine" radar "Arrow" anti-ballistic Multimission phased array radar. missile weapon system EL/M-2106NG Point defense radar Surface-to-Air missile 3-Dimensional (3D). weapon system EL/M-2238 Multifunction air defense radar Shipborne weapon systems Planar array radar. EL/M-2248 Multifunction air defense radar Shipborne weapon systems Phased array radar. Nautilus Air defense radar Tactical high-energy laser For interception of Katyusha rockets. weapon system GENERAL DYNAMICS UK, Hastings, East Sussex, England, UK SMS Air Defense Stores safe carriage and release system Tornado — SMS Fighter/Attack Stores safe carriage and release system Eurofighter With Eurofighter partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Laser Interoperability, Tomorrow's Answer to Precision Engagement
    Joint Laser Interoperability, Tomorrow's Answer to Precision Engagement by Lt Col David Neuenswander Introduction We think of ourselves as a precision-capable air force, yet we have a serious gap in that capability. As of 2001, most US precision engagement capability comes from laser-guided "man in the loop" weapons carried on fighters/attack helicopters.1 Very few US ground forces and some combat aircraft do not have any laser-guided precision weapons.2 If the DOD is committed to JV 2020, it must find innovative ways to provide a precision engagement capability to all US forces. Since laser systems already provide most of the DOD’s precision capability, the innovation must include lasers. JV 2020 talks full-spectrum dominance and precision engagement, but without lasers those visions are but a mirage. According to JV 2020, innovation can occur, "from fielding new things, or by imaginatively recombining old things in new ways."3 This is what must be done--combine current laser capabilities with new technologies to create a concept called Joint Laser Interoperability. Background Current US Laser Systems Lasers and laser-guided weapons are not new to the inventory. In 1972 USAF fighters ushered the world into the age of precision engagement by destroying North Vietnam’s Paul Doumer Bridge with laser-guided bombs.4 Since the Vietnam War, every branch of the US Armed Forces created their own niche for laser systems. These laser systems fall into four basic categories: laser range finders, laser designators, laser spot trackers, and laser guided weapons. Laser Range Finders Laser range finders were the first military application of the laser as a tool of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Usaf & Ussf Almanac 2020
    USAF & USSF ALMANAC 2020 WEAPONS & PLATFORMS By Aaron M. U. Church Bombers 112 Fighter/Attack 114 Special Ops 117 ISR/BM/C3 121 Tankers 128 Airlift 131 Helicopters 135 Trainers 137 Targets 138 RPAs 139 Strategic Weapons 140 Standoff Weapons 141 Air-to-Air Missiles 142 Air-to-Ground Weapons 143 Space/Satellite Systems 148 Mike Killian Mike 110 JUNE 2020 AIRFORCEMAG.COM BOMBER AIRCRAFT William Lewis/USAF William Master Sgt. Matthew Plew Sgt. Matthew Master B-1B LANCER B-2 SPIRIT Long-range conventional bomber Long-range heavy bomber Brief: The B-1B is a conventional, long-range, supersonic penetrating strike Brief:The B-2 is a stealthy, long-range, penetrating nuclear and conven- aircraft, derived from the canceled B-1A. The B-1A first flew on Dec 23, tional strike bomber. It is based on a flying wing design combining LO with 1974, and four prototypes were developed and tested before the program high aerodynamic efficiency. Spirit entered combat during Allied Force was canceled in 1977. The Reagan administration revived the program on March 24, 1999, striking Serbian targets. Production was completed as the B-1B in 1981, adding 74,000 lb of useable payload, improved radar, in three blocks, and all aircraft were upgraded to Block 30 standard with and reduced radar cross section, although speed was reduced to Mach AESA radar. Production was limited to 21 aircraft due to cost, and a single 1.2. Its three internal weapons bays can each carry different weapons, B-2 was subsequently lost in a crash at Anderson, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 3-09.1 Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Laser
    Joint Pub 3-09.1 Joint Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for Laser Designation Operations 28 May 1999 PREFACE 1. Scope 3. Application This publication provides joint tactics, a. Doctrine and selected tactics, techniques, and procedures for employing techniques, and procedures and guidance light amplification by stimulated emission of established in this publication apply to the radiation (laser) target designators, laser commanders of combatant commands, acquisition devices, and laser-guided subunified commands, joint task forces, and munitions. It describes joint laser planning, subordinate components of these commands. coordination procedures, capabilities, and These principles and guidance also may apply limitations. when significant forces of one Service are attached to forces of another Service or when 2. Purpose significant forces of one Service support forces of another Service. This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint b. The guidance in this publication is Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth doctrine and authoritative; as such, this doctrine (or JTTP) selected joint tactics, techniques, and will be followed except when, in the judgment procedures (JTTP) to govern the joint of the commander, exceptional circumstances activities and performance of the Armed dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between Forces of the United States in joint operations the contents of this publication and the and provides the doctrinal basis for US contents of Service publications, this military involvement in multinational and publication will take precedence for the interagency operations. It provides military activities of joint forces unless the Chairman guidance for the exercise of authority by of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in combatant commanders and other joint coordination with the other members of the force commanders and prescribes doctrine Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more and selected tactics, techniques, and current and specific guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • RAF Tornadoes at War Andy Evans Looks at the Role of the GR.1 in the Gulf War
    WWW.SAMPUBLICATIONS.COM 46 OPERATION GRANBY COMBAT-ZONE ZA809/BA ‘Awesome Annie’ carrying a pair of LGBs CREDIT: Steve Morris Operation Granby RAF Tornadoes at War Andy Evans looks at the role of the GR.1 in the Gulf War or the RAF, Desert Storm could he The former RAF Muharraq - now Bahrain 14, plus Nos.13 and 617 Squadrons later on. truly described as the ‘Tornadoes International Airport - was first to receive GR.1s On station at Tabuk were fifteen Tornados, of war’. Representing three-quarters when a dozen aircraft left Bruggen, on 27 which seven were equipped to carry ALARM of the British air attack force at the August 1990. A second squadron of Laarbruch- missiles as an alternative to the usual bomb opening of hostilities, the GR.1 strikers based aircraft, but with Marham crews, load. Dhahran had fifteen GR.1s and six recce Fundertook assaults on Iraq’s war machine, began arriving there on 19 September, but GR.1As, and its RAF component came under hitting its airfields, weapon storage sites repositioned to Tabuk, in far north-western the command of Group Captain Cliff Spink and communications centres. Despite early Saudi Arabia, from 8 October onwards. A who, unlike his two fellow base commanders, misfortunes – the aircraft emerged from the further twelve Bruggen aircraft arrived on 3 was an air defence rather than ground attack conflict with its reputation immeasurably January 1991. The reconnaissance element, flyer. Also at Dhahran, No.31 Squadron led strengthened. In addition to bombing, the provided by Laarbruch, was of six GR.1As by Wing Cdr Jerry Witts was reinforced by aircraft hastily, yet successfully, introduced ferried to Dhahran between 14-16 January.
    [Show full text]