Business Development Opportunities in the Utica Shale Play in Consideration of the Geographic Alignment of the Fairway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Business Development Opportunities in the Utica Shale Play in Consideration of the Geographic Alignment of the Fairway Business Development Opportunities in the Utica Shale Play in Consideration of the Geographic Alignment of the Fairway Defining Business Opportunities within a Geographic Footprint Jim Scherrer, Energy Resources Director Geologic Analysis November 2015 The purpose of this document is to highlight the current business development opportunities that arise across the breadth of the Utica Shale fairway. The oil and gas resources underlying the Marcellus from within the “Utica Shale” play have become better defined through the shale resource exploration and recovery operations of various exploration and production (E&P) Above: The “tiramisu model” companies. The geographic alignment is unique and now is provides a visualization of the better defined; offering opportunities for business horizontal drilling taking place in development that aligns with the geography of the fairway. shale repositories worldwide. Additionally, boundaries such as the “Line of Death” for economic quantities of oil and gas within the play have been better delineated. More recent test drilling within the Appalachian Basin below the Marcellus (Devonian Period), in stratigraphy generally known as the “Utica” (Ordovician Period), there has been a resurgence of activity as this carbon-rich play has yielded unexpected, very positive results. This Utica formation assessment also includes the Point Pleasant formation. Taury Smith (NY State Geological Survey) says the Utica Shale play is more appropriately called the “Utica Shale and associated organic‐rich calcareous shale and interbedded limestone and shale play.” This report relies on many sources, but primarily the Utica Shale Appalachian Basin Exploration Consortium (the Consortium). The 15 members of the Consortium were joined by individuals from four state geological surveys, two universities, one consulting company, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), who collectively comprised the Research Team members of the Consortium. http://www.wvgs.wvnet.edu/utica/playbook/pb_consortium.aspx 1 Utica Is Bigger Than Many Thought The Utica Shale play could hold far more oil and gas than previously estimated, the US Department of Energy’s Fossil Energy Office (FOE) said this week (10/15/2015). If the play’s commercial potential could be realized, it could be, geographically, the nation’s largest gas field. FOE said the two-year study, which West Virginia University led with financial support from DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratories (NETL) and 14 industry members of the Utica Shale Appalachian Basin Exploration Consortium, estimates the Utica holds technically recoverable volumes of nearly 2 billion barrels (BBbls) of crude oil and 782 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of gas. The results, which build upon previous estimates, far exceed the US Geological Survey’s 2012 assessment and highlight new potential for the Utica shale, FOE said. Background The Appalachian Oil and Natural Gas Research Consortium has led the way recently in definition of the resource play called the Utica Shale. They describe the play as neither “Utica” nor “shale” as it focuses on both the Utica and the Upper Point Pleasant formations; as interbedded limestone and organic-rich shale. Further, West Virginia University (WVU) is committed to expanding education, research and outreach on technical aspects of shale gas development and has a focus on innovations in system-wide control using operational and economic data to allow companies to be profitable in a competitive market. This appears to be the first consortium to consider research on economically recoverable oil and gas from the play which would publish reports on their findings. The “play book” incorporates and integrates results of research conducted at various granularities, ranging from basin-scale stratigraphy and architecture to the creation of nanoporosity as gas was generated from organic matter in the reservoir. Between these two end members, the research team has mapped the thickness and distribution of the Utica and Point Pleasant formations using well logs; determined favorable reservoir facies through an examination of outcrops, cores and samples at the macroscopic and microscopic scales; identified the source of the total organic carbon (TOC) component in the shales and estimated the maturation level of the TOC; and searched for reservoir porosity utilizing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technology. The Study built on and continues what was learned when AONGRC compiled the Trenton-Black River Play Book. That study examined the stratigraphic interval from the base of the Black River up through the Trenton Limestone and the stratigraphically-equivalent Lexington Limestone. However, it also included an examination of the upper Trenton time-equivalent Point Pleasant Formation that was deposited in a shallow depocenter located between the Trenton Platform to the north, extending from what is now Indiana to New York, and the Lexington Platform to the south, in what is now Kentucky, southwestern West Virginia and western Virginia. 2 Doing Business in the Utica Shale Business development opportunities within the upstream, mid-stream and downstream supply chain exist over nearly the entire Utica Shale play, with the exception of the “immature” and the “over mature” regions found on the western and eastern boundaries, respectively. The “north south” alignment of the oil-, wet gas-, and dry gas- fields offer unique business development opportunities in each of the up-, mid- and down-stream business markets. Some unique opportunities could include: Up-stream Water supply, treatment, retention Rig Support Services Hydrofracturing Mid-stream Field Work Staffing services Pipe, conduit, trenching Down-stream Gas to electric plants Gas used in micro applications Broad ranges of utility applications three The figure below shows that the Conodont alteration is likely to hold for quite some time. 3 The forces which created the coal seams that are abundant on the eastern region have “baked out” the free oil and gas. Geologists and gas companies know the area directly around the Lackawanna Syncline (the banana- shaped formation that runs through Luzerne and Lackawanna counties), where the bulk of the region’s famous anthracite is found, is likely to be unproductive because the high temperatures and pressure that hardened the coal also drove the gas out of the carbon-rich shale. Additionally, the under-maturation of the formation on the western front limits development to mid- Ohio. New York boundaries are constrained by the “fracking moratorium”, while southern boundaries are delineated by the Appalachian mountain range. The Utica Details Near the end of Trenton time, while relatively clean carbonates were being deposited on the platforms, a mixture of clastic muds and carbonates was being deposited in the intra-platform basin, creating the Logana Shale Member of the Lexington/Trenton Formation, and the younger Point Pleasant Formation above the Lexington/Trenton, which was succeeded by deposition of the darker, but not necessarily more organic-rich Utica Shale. The Utica Shale was deposited in the upper Ordovician Period (covers the time between 485 and 444 million years ago). It is below the Marcellus of Devonian period (covers the time period between 410 million years ago to 354 million years ago) and separated by the Silurian Period (440 - 410 million years ago) in between. It is above the Trenton Limestone, and often includes the Point Pleasant formation. An in-depth study in Eastern Ohio and Western Pennsylvania found the following (from Abstract): ”Approximately 500 well logs and three cores from eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, and northern West Virginia are used to construct a depositional model of the Utica Shale and associated Upper Ordovician strata. Previous studies of outcrop data from the Cincinnati arch and Jessamine dome recognized a number of Late Mohawkian to Early Cincinnatian third-order sequences deposited in an active foreland basin during onset of the Taconic orogeny. Sequences consist of deepening upward successions of transgressive limestone and shale, recording a period of sustained subsidence and increasing sea-level along the eastern margin of North America. The transition from a carbonate dominated system to a clastic dominated system reflects the collapse and drowning of a widespread carbonate platform. The Trenton/Lexington Limestone through Utica Shale comprise the transgressive systems tract (TST) of a large second-order sequence, superimposed with four, smaller scale third-order composite sequences. Third order sequences are regionally correlative, aggradational, and lack low-stand deposits. Sequences are separated by type 3 sequence boundaries that amalgamate with transgressive surfaces and separate underlying highstand system tracts (HST’s) from overlying TST’s. 4 Chronostratigraphic surfaces demonstrate that basinal interbedded lime mudstone, shale, and marl facies of the Logana and Point Pleasant formations are contemporaneous and genetically related to platform limestone on the flanking Trenton and Lexington platforms. Isopach thickness maps of composite sequences indicate significant accumulation of carbonate sediment and build-up of the platforms during the Late Mohawkian, followed by increased clastic sedimentation and basin fill in the cross-strike Sebree trough and Point Pleasant subbasin during the Early Cincinnatian.” http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2012/50613mcclain/ndx_mcclain.pdf
Recommended publications
  • Fractured Shale Gas Potential in New York
    FRACTURED SHALE GAS POTENTIAL IN NEW YORK David G. HILL and Tracy E. LOMBARDI TICORA Geosciences, Inc., Arvada, Colorado, USA John P. MARTIN New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, New York, USA ABSTRACT In 1821, a shallow well drilled in the Devonian age shale ushered in a new era for the United States when natural gas was produced, transported and sold to local establishments in the town of Fredonia, New York. Following this discovery, hundreds of shallow shale wells were drilled along the Lake Erie shoreline and eventually several shale gas fields were established southeastward from the lake in the late 1800’s. Since the mid 1900’s, approximately 100 wells have been drilled in New York to test the fractured shale potential of the Devonian and Silurian age shales. With so few wells drilled over the past century, the true potential of fractured shale reservoirs has not been thoroughly assessed, and there may be a substantial resource. While the resource for shale gas in New York is large, ranging from 163-313 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) and the history of production dates back over 180 years, it has not been a major contributor to natural gas production in New York. A review of the history and research conducted on the shales shows that the resource in New York is poorly understood and has not been adequately tested. Other shales such as the Silurian and Ordovician Utica Shale may also hold promise as new commercial shale gas reservoirs. Experience developing shale gas plays in the past 20 years has demonstrated that every shale play is unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 GEOLOGY
    Chapter 4 GEOLOGY CHAPTER 4 GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 4‐2 4.2 BLACK SHALES ................................................................................................................................................. 4‐3 4.3 UTICA SHALE ................................................................................................................................................... 4‐6 4.3.2 Thermal Maturity and Fairways ...................................................................................................... 4‐14 4.3.3 Potential for Gas Production ............................................................................................................ 4‐14 4.4 MARCELLUS FORMATION ................................................................................................................................. 4‐15 4.4.1 Total Organic Carbon ....................................................................................................................... 4‐17 4.4.2 Thermal Maturity and Fairways ...................................................................................................... 4‐17 4.4.3 Potential for Gas Production ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Marcellus/Utica Shale
    Marcellus/Utica Shale Presented by Jeff Wlahofsky Jay Meglich George Adams Discussion Topics • Common Industry Terms and Definitions • Video of Horizontal Drilling Process • Overview of Geology Differences Between Marcellus and Utica Shale • Background Regarding Marcellus Activity in PA • Current State of the Shale Gas Industry • Planning Opportunities for Income Deferral or Capital Gain Tax Treatment 2 Industry Terms and Definitions • Abandoned Well – A well no longer in use; a dry hole that, in most states, must be properly plugged • Bonus – Usually, the bonus is the money paid by the lessee for the execution of an oil and gas lease by the landowner. Another form is called an oil or royalty bonus. This may be in the form of an overriding royalty reserved to the landowner in addition to the usual one‐eighth or 12.5% royalty. • Christmas Tree – An assembly of valves mounted on the casing head through which a well is produced. The Christmas tree also contains valves for testing the well and for shutting it in if necessary. The “Christmas Tree” includes blow‐out preventer valves. 3 Industry Terms and Definitions (cont’d) • Completion – To finish a well so that it is ready to produce oil or gas. After reaching total depth (T.D.), casing is run and cemented; casing is perforated opposite the producing zone, tubing is run, and control and flow valves are installed at the wellhead. Well completions vary according to the kind of well, depth, and the formation from which the well is to produce 4 Industry Terms and Definitions (cont’d) • Delay Rentals – These are amounts paid to the lessor for the privilege of deferring the commencement of a well on the lease.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    (Sections) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This “Geologic Play Book for Utica Shale Appalachian Basin Exploration” (hereafter referred to as the “Utica Shale Play Book Study” or simply “Study”) represents the results of a two-year research effort by workers in five different states with the financial support of fifteen oil and gas industry partners. The Study was made possible through a coordinated effort between the Appalachian Basin Oil & Natural Gas Research Consortium (AONGRC) and the West Virginia University Shale Research, Education, Policy and Economic Development Center. The Study was funded by industry members of the Utica Shale Appalachian Basin Exploration Consortium (the Consortium). The 15 industry members of the Consortium were joined by individuals from four state geological surveys, two universities, one consulting company, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), who collectively comprised the Research Team members of the Consortium. This play book incorporates and integrates results of research conducted at various granularities, ranging from basin-scale stratigraphy and architecture to the creation of nano- porosity as gas was generated from organic matter in the reservoir. Between these two end members, the research team has mapped the thickness and distribution of the Utica and Point Pleasant formations using well logs; determined favorable reservoir facies through an examination of outcrops, cores and samples at the macroscopic and microscopic scales; identified the source of the total organic carbon (TOC) component in the shales and estimated the maturation level of the TOC; and searched for reservoir porosity utilizing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Drilling Activity and Production
    (Sections) 2.0 REGIONAL DRILLING ACTIVITY AND PRODUCTION Naming Convention: 2-digit state code/3-digit county code/5-character identifier Example: 37027_OC12 (Pennsylvania, Butler County, Outcrop Sample 12) For all other wells, the file naming convention leads with the API number. The leading API number/Project ID is then followed by the code for the file category or categories under which the data are classified. For a standard file containing information on a single well or sample, the following naming convention is used: Naming Convention: API number or Project ID_File Type Code(s)_Optional Description Example: 34003636910000_SRA_TOC_BP_Chemical_Plant_Well_4.xls As of July 9, 2014, there were 5696 files organized under this naming convention. In addition to these files, there were an additional 35 files that contain data for multiple wells. These files, which are often final results of data analyzed by service companies or consultants, can contain results for many different wells or samples. For these document types, the following naming convention is used: Naming Convention: 2-digit state code/000/MLTPL_File Type Codes_Optional Description Example: 34000MLTPL_SRA_TOC_XRD_OvertonEnergy.pdf Individual wells contained in the file are stored in a second table, which is linked by the file name, allowing the user to search by any of the individual API numbers/Project IDs contained within the multiple well file. As the data collected, generated, and interpreted by the research team became finalized, new file categories were created and populated with project results. In addition, a general file with all header data was created, allowing users to import project wells into various subsurface mapping programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Where in New York Are the Marcellus and Utica Shales??
    Where in New York are the Marcellus and Utica Shales?? How do they get to the gas resource and how do they get the gas out of the ground? What are the concerns about this entire process and what can/should we do about it? Schlumberger, Inc Depth and extent of the Marcellus Shale Marcellus, NY type section Source – dSGEIS, 2009 East-West Geologic Section of the Marcellus Shale Across Southern New York Thickening of Oatka Creek Thinning of Oatka Creek Lash and Engelder, 2009 and Union Springs members North-South Geologic Section Across New York State Source – dSGEIS, 2009 Source – dSGEIS, 2009 Medina SS Central/ Western NY Marcellus Stratigraphy Oatka Creek Cherry Valley Union Springs Oil and Gas wells are not new in Pennsylvania and New York……. …and there are different regulations in and within each state. Multiple steel casings with high-strength cement to isolate well from surrounding aquifers and bedrock units. What is different about Marcellus/Utica shale gas development? East-northeast trending J1 fractures more closely spaced and cross-cut by less well- developed, northwest-trending J2 fractures Dual porosity gas reservoir where fractures drain rapidly and matrix drain slowly Drill horizontal wells to the north-northwest, or south- southeast that cross and Free gas and adsorbed drain densely developed J1 gas in matrix fractures Connect matrix porosity to the wellbore by intersecting multiple J1 fractures Marcellus Shale Gas Development Horizontal Drilling in Black Shale with High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing 3,500 ft 3,500 4,000 ft Meyer (2009) Meyer (2009) Microseismic Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing “Typical” Drillpad Design Water-source pond Drill cuttings pond Drilling Phase – drillrig, pumps, supplies, frack tanks (a month or two) Hydro-fracking Phase – (a week or two) Injection pumps, supplies, and many frack tanks for fresh and flowback waters Where do you get the water for fracking? Inter- basin Trans- fer Each source has its own set of concerns…….
    [Show full text]
  • The Classic Upper Ordovician Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Eastern Cincinnati Arch
    International Geoscience Programme Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett – Kyle R. Hartshorn – Allison L. Young – Cameron E. Schwalbach – Alycia L. Stigall International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 653 Third Annual Meeting - 2018 - Athens, Ohio, USA Field Trip Guidebook THE CLASSIC UPPER ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE EASTERN CINCINNATI ARCH Carlton E. Brett Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Kyle R. Hartshorn Dry Dredgers, 6473 Jayfield Drive, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, USA ([email protected]) Allison L. Young Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, 2624 Clifton Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA ([email protected]) Cameron E. Schwalbach 1099 Clough Pike, Batavia, OH 45103, USA ([email protected]) Alycia L. Stigall Department of Geological Sciences and OHIO Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Studies, Ohio University, 316 Clippinger Lab, Athens, Ohio 45701, USA ([email protected]) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We extend our thanks to the many colleagues and students who have aided us in our field work, discussions, and publications, including Chris Aucoin, Ben Dattilo, Brad Deline, Rebecca Freeman, Steve Holland, T.J. Malgieri, Pat McLaughlin, Charles Mitchell, Tim Paton, Alex Ries, Tom Schramm, and James Thomka. No less gratitude goes to the many local collectors, amateurs in name only: Jack Kallmeyer, Tom Bantel, Don Bissett, Dan Cooper, Stephen Felton, Ron Fine, Rich Fuchs, Bill Heimbrock, Jerry Rush, and dozens of other Dry Dredgers. We are also grateful to David Meyer and Arnie Miller for insightful discussions of the Cincinnatian, and to Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • XRF Workshop Book
    Workshop Materials (1 of 2) Table of Contents Workshop Materials (book 1 of 2) Page Agenda 1 Welcome Presentation (Steve Kaczmarek) 3 Lectures Introduction to the Chemistry of Rocks and Minerals (Peter Voice) 7 Geology of Michigan (Bill Harrison) 22 XRF Theory (Steve Kaczmarek) 44 Student Research Posters Silurian A-1 Carbonate (Matt Hemenway) 56 Silurian Burnt Bluff Group (Mohamed Al Musawi) 58 Classroom Activities Powder Problem 60 Fossil Free For All 69 Bridge to Nowhere 76 Get to Know Your Pet Rock 90 Forensic XRF 92 Alien Agua 96 Appendices (book 2 of 2) Appendix A: MGRRE Factsheet 105 Appendix B: Michigan Natural Resources Statistics 107 Appendix C: CoreKids Outreach Program 126 Appendix D: Graphing & Statistical Analysis Activity 138 Appendix E: K-12 Science Performance Expectations 144 Appendix F: Workshop Evaluation Form 179 Workshop Facilitators Bridging the Gap between Geology & Chemistry Sponsored by the Western Michigan University, the Michigan Geological Repository for Research and Education, and the U.S. National Science Foundation This workshop is for educators interested in learning more about the chemistry of geologic materials. Wednesday, August 9, 2017 (8 am - 5 pm) Tentative Agenda 8:00-8:20: Welcome (Steve Kaczmarek) Agenda, Safety, & Introductions 8:20-8:50: Introduction to Geological Materials (Peter Voice) An introduction to rocks, minerals, and their elemental chemistry 8:50-9:00: Questions/Discussion 9:00-9:30: Introduction to MI Basin Geology (Bill Harrison) An introduction to the common rock types and economic
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Hydrogelogic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan. Apple, B.A., and H.W. Reeves 2007. U.S. Geological Surve
    In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michigan By Beth A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves In cooperation with the State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality Open-File Report 2007-1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation Beth, A. Apple and Howard W. Reeves, 2007, Summary of Hydrogeologic Conditions by County for the State of Michi- gan. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1236, 78 p. Cover photographs Clockwise from upper left: Photograph of Pretty Lake by Gary Huffman. Photograph of a river in winter by Dan Wydra. Photographs of Lake Michigan and the Looking Glass River by Sharon Baltusis. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician Point Pleasant/Utica-Lower Paleozoic
    Ordovician Point Pleasant/Utica-Lower Paleozoic Total Petroleum System—Revisions to the Utica- Lower Paleozoic Total Petroleum System in the Appalachian Basin Province Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5025 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. An outcrop of planar- to irregular-bedded limestone and shale of the Point Pleasant Formation that is exposed along Big Run in Clermont County, Ohio. The red and white measuring stick is approximately 0.5 meters in length (1.6 feet). Permission was required prior to entering private property to visit this exposure. Photograph from Schumacher and others (2013). Inset photograph. Well core no. 3003 (API no. 3403122838) from the Point Pleasant Formation, Coshocton County, Ohio (interval depth, 5,660–5,670 feet). Total length of core shown is approximately 3 feet. Photograph provided by Michael Solis, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geological Survey. Ordovician Point Pleasant/Utica-Lower Paleozoic Total Petroleum System— Revisions to the Utica-Lower Paleozoic Total Petroleum System in the Appalachian Basin Province By Catherine B. Enomoto, Michael H. Trippi, and Debra K. Higley Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5025 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2019 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Poster
    EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL STACKED SHALE-GAS RESERVOIRS ACROSS NORTHERN AND NORTH-CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA ABSTRACT Jessica Pierson Moore1, Susan E. Pool1, Philip A. Dinterman1, J. Eric Lewis1, Ray Boswell2 Three shale-gas units underlying northern and north-central West Virginia create opportunity for one horizontal well pad to produce from multiple zones. The Upper Ordovician Utica/Point Pleasant, Middle Devonian Marcellus, and Upper Devonian Burket/Geneseo 1 West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey, 2 U.S. DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory construction of fairway maps for each play. Current drilling activity focuses on the Marcellus, with more than 1,000 horizontal completions reported through mid-2015. Across northern West Virginia, the Marcellus is 40 to 60 ft. thick with a depth range between 5,000 and 8,000 ft. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) REGIONAL GEOLOGY is generally 10% or greater. Quartz content is relatively high (~60%) and clay content is low (~30%). Reservoir pressure estimates STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTION FROM HARRISON CO., OHIO TO HARDY CO., WEST VIRGINIA range from 0.3 to 0.7 psi/ft and generally increase to the north. Volumetric assessment of the Marcellus in this area yields preliminary NW SE 81° 80° 79° 78° 1 2 3 4 5 original gas-in-place estimates of 9 to 24 Bcf/mi2. OH WV WV WV WV Pennsylvania Figure 2.—Location of seismic sections, wells, and major basement Harrison Co. Marshall Co. Marion Co. Preston Co. Hardy Co. 34-067-20103 47-051-00539 47-049-00244 47-077-00119 47-031-00021 UTICA SHALE PLAY GR 41 miles GR 36 miles GR 27 miles GR 32 miles GR Westmoreland The Burket /Geneseo interval is approximately 15 to 40 ft thick across the fairway.
    [Show full text]