DOCSLIB.ORG

Applied Ethics in Animal Research: Philosophy, Regulation, and Laboratory Applications John P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Applied Ethics in Animal Research: Philosophy, Regulation, and Laboratory Applications John P Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Purdue University Press e-books OLD Purdue University Press 1-1-2002 Applied ethics in animal research: Philosophy, regulation, and laboratory applications John P. Gluck Tony DiPasquale F. Barbara Orlans Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/press_ebooks Gluck, John P.; DiPasquale, Tony; and Orlans, F. Barbara , " Applied ethics in animal research: Philosophy, regulation, and laboratory applications" (2002). Purdue University Press e-books OLD. Paper 16. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/press_ebooks/16 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Gluck, DiPasquale, Orlans Gluck, DiPasquale, Applied Ethics / Veterinary Studies Few contemporary issues arouse as much passionate rhetoric as the ethics of labo- ratory animal use. These essays challenge people of good faith to face the issues Applied Ethics in relevant to the ethics of using animals in biomedical and behavioral research. They discuss issues of philosophy, statutory regulation, and laboratory application of ethics in ways depleted of sheer rhetoric and attempts to manipulate. The result is an open dialogue that allows readers to reach a deepened understanding of the Animal Research issue and to form their own opinions. “This is an excellent compilation of analyses from some of the leading thinkers in Applied Ethics in Animal Research the world on animal research ethics. I would recommend it as a useful addition to anyone’s library.”—ANDREW N. ROWAN, PH.D., Senior Vice President, Philosophy, Regulation, Humane Society of the United States “This book advances our understanding of an inherently compelling, complex, and and Laboratory Applications conflicted field. This text is impressive for its self-honesty and scope. It provides a sound conceptual foundation for analyzing the most substantive issues in animal research. It examines the historical, philosophical, and regulatory issues shaping the current animal research practices with coherence and clarity. Perhaps more importantly, it offers practical tools for preparing investigators to identify and respond to the newly emerging ethical challenges in animal research.” —LAURA WEISS ROBERTS, M.D., Director, Empirical Ethics Group, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico Also of Interest Edited by Child Abuse, Domestic Violence, and Animal Abuse John P. Gluck Linking the Circles of Compassion for Prevention and Intervention Edited by Frank R. Ascione and Phil Arkow Tony DiPasquale ISBN 1-55753-143-9 F. Barbara Orlans Cruelty to Animals and Interpersonal Violence Readings in Research and Application Edited by Randall Lockwood and Frank R. Ascione Purdue ISBN 1-55753-106-4 ISBN 1-55753-137-4 > Purdue University Press ,!7IB5F7-fdbdhh!:t;K;k;K;k West Lafayette, Indiana Purdue University Press Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page i Applied Ethics in Animal Research Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page ii Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page iii Applied Ethics in Animal Research Philosophy, Regulation, and Laboratory Applications Edited by John P. Gluck, Tony DiPasquale, and F. Barbara Orlans PURDUE UNIVERSITY PRESS West Lafayette, Indiana Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page iv Copyright ©2002 by Purdue University. All Rights Reserved. œThe paper used in this book meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48–1992. Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Applied ethics in animal research : philosophy, regulation, and labora- tory applications / edited by John P. Gluck, Tony DiPasquale, and F. Barbara Orlans. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-55753-136-6 (alk. paper)—ISBN 1-55753-137-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Animal experimentation—Moral and ethical aspects. 2. Labo- ratory animals—Moral and ethical aspects. 3. Animal welfare—Moral and ethical aspects. I. Gluck, John P., 1943– II. DiPasquale,Tony, 1963– III. Orlans, F. Barbara. IV. Title. HV4915 .A66 2000 179Ј.4—dc21 00-062783 Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page v Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xiii Introduction 1 John P. Gluck and Tony DiPasquale Ethics, Animals, and Scientific Inquiry 13 R.G. Frey Can They Reason? Can They Talk? Can We Do without Moral Price Tags in Animal Ethics? 25 Nikola Biller-Andorno The Rhetorics of Animal Rights 55 Anita Guerrini Cognitive Ethology, Deep Ethology, and the Great Ape/Animal Project: Expanding the Community of Equals 77 Marc Bekoff Ethics, Animal Welfare, and ACUCs 113 Bernard E. Rollin Ethical Themes of National Regulations Governing Animal Experiments: An International Perspective 131 F. Barbara Orlans The Importance of Nonstatistical Experimental Design in Refining Animal Experiments for Scientists, IACUCs, and Other Ethical Review Panels 149 David B. Morton The Editors 179 Contributors 181 Index 183 v Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page vi Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page vii One may ask even the devotee of science that he should acquire an ethical understanding of himself before he de- votes himself to scholarship and that he should continue to understand himself ethically while immersed in his labors. —Søren Kierkegaard Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page viii Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page ix Preface During a recent intense discussion about the implications of consider- ing animals as having moral standing, a prominent biomedical re- searcher defended her resistance to applying the concept to animals. She explained that she considered animals to be just another category of consumable laboratory “supply,” like glassware and computer disks. When asked to expand her position, she pointed out that the supply cat- egory was the place in the budget where animal costs were listed and justified in a typical grant application. Although she was clearly at- tempting to interject a sense of irony into the discussion, her example does illustrate one extreme in the debate, one that sees animals as a form of furniture, there for our use and benefit and deserving of only minimal and indirect ethical concern. At the other extreme are those who see nature to be a virtual democracy, with all or most animals de- serving rights that protect against unwanted life intrusions by humans, no matter how beneficial to humans the intrusions might be. Although these extreme positions continue to be forcefully advanced, they have begun to give way to what has been referred to as the “troubled mid- dle.” The middle is troubled for a number of reasons. Some question whether the middle is philosophically coherent, whereas others argue that the middle is troubled because it actually confronts the day-to-day reality of human-animal relationships, which seem from some vantages to be indeed irrational and inconsistent. Some have also charged that the debate has been fought primarily with rhetorical devices devoid of validity checks on the substance. Proponents of both sides have shame- lessly marched images of dying babies and suffering animals across screens and in newspapers in ways calculated to make one react solely ix Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page x x Preface from the gut. The result is that this profound ethical issue is converted to crude counting of which picture provokes more gut reactions. However, for over twenty years, Barbara Orlans, pioneer in the field of animal ethics, has taken a different tack. Instead of presenting emo- tional appeals, she has challenged people of good faith to face the issues relevant to the ethics of using animals in biomedical and behavioral re- search. Toward that end she created a series of conferences specifically fo- cused on the topic of the ethics of animal research. The clear aim of these conferences has been to create a unique venue in which the representa- tives of the various perspectives in the debate could come together and listen to one another in formal presentations, small group discussions, and casual social encounters. These have been remarkable conferences, at- tended by scientists, some deeply involved in the use of animals, philoso- phers representing a number of contrasting theoretical perspectives, ani- mal advocates from across the spectrum of activism, historians of science, and members of the interested public. To date seven of these conferences have taken place, three at the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown University (1991, 1994, and 1995), one at the Poynter Center at Indiana University (1996), one at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (1997), one at the University of California at Davis (1999), and most recently, at the Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine (2001). Feedback from attendees has consistently revealed that the con- ferences have provided a greater understanding of the issues and an im- proved respect for the people involved. What follows in this volume is a collection of essays contributed by individuals who have presented their ideas at these conferences and who fit squarely into the troubled middle. The authors address the issues of philosophy, statutory regulation, and laboratory application of ethics in ways meant to avoid sheer rhetoric and attempts to manipulate. The es- says are tempered by open discussion with individuals with different opinions, not merely audiences of true believers. R. G. Frey and Nikola Biller-Andorno expand the notions of the moral standing of animals, Anita Guerrini analyzes the history of the methods of argumentation, Marc Bekoff addresses the implications of what we have begun to know about the minds of animals, Bernard Rollin and Barbara Orlans describe the nature and value of regulatory structures, and David Morton shows how respect for animals can be converted from theory to action in the Gluck_*i_xiv_FM 10/23/01 12:55 PM Page xi Preface xi laboratory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Leslie [email protected]
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2006 | Issue 1 Article 5 Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Leslie [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Recommended Citation Leslie, Jeff () "Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2006: Iss. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2006/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lay Persons and Community Values in Reviewing Animal Experimentation Jeff Lesliet Is it morally acceptable to use animals in scientific experi- ments that will not benefit those animals, but instead solely benefit people? Most people would say yes; but at the same time most would view the use of animals as a regrettable necessity, to be pursued only when the benefits to people outweigh the harm to the animals, and only after everything possible is done to minimize that harm. Identifying benefits and harms may require specialized scientific and technological understanding, to be sure, but evaluating the tradeoff between them requires not technical expertise, but rather the capacity to make difficult moral judg- ments. We do not usually think of moral judgments as the unique terrain of any particular set of professionals or experts. Anyone capable of ethical reasoning has an equal claim to exper- tise, and a pluralistic society can be expected to exhibit a wide range of moral beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • Aus Politik Und Zeitgeschichte Mensch Und Tier
    APuZAus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 62. Jahrgang · 8–9/2012 · 20. Februar 2012 Mensch und Tier Hilal Sezgin Dürfen wir Tiere für unsere Zwecke nutzen? Thilo Spahl Das Bein in meiner Küche Carola Otterstedt Bedeutung des Tieres für unsere Gesellschaft Sonja Buschka · Julia Gutjahr · Marcel Sebastian Grundlagen und Perspektiven der Human-Animal Studies Peter Dinzelbacher Mensch und Tier in der europäischen Geschichte Mieke Roscher Tierschutz- und Tierrechtsbewegung – ein historischer Abriss Kathrin Voss Kampagnen der Tierrechtsorganisation PETA Wolf-Michael Catenhusen Tiere und Mensch-Tier-Mischwesen in der Forschung Editorial Vegetarismus ist „in“. Bücher wie „Tiere essen“ von Jonathan Safran Foer und „Anständig essen“ von Karen Duve stehen wo- chenlang in den Bestsellerlisten. Immer mehr Menschen ent- scheiden sich für eine fleischärmere oder fleischlose Ernährung; manche verzichten sogar auf alle tierischen Produkte und leben vegan. Die Motive sind vielfältig. Neben gesundheitlichen Er- wägungen oder Kritik an der Massentierhaltung – etwa an Kli- ma- und Umweltschäden, dem Leiden der Tiere, den Einbußen in der Qualität durch Zugabe von Antibiotika – stellt sich für viele die grundsätzliche Frage, ob wir Tiere für unsere Zwecke (und wenn ja, in welcher Weise) nutzen dürfen. Ein Blick in die Geschichte zeigt, dass Menschen sich schon immer Tiere zu nutzen gemacht haben – als Nahrungsquelle, für schwere Arbeiten in der Landwirtschaft, im Krieg und bei der Jagd, als Statussymbole und zum Vergnügen, für medizi- nische Versuche, als Haustiere. Die Tierschutz- und die Tier- rechtsbewegungen haben in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten für einen Bewusstseinswandel beim Umgang mit Tieren gesorgt. So wurde der Tierschutz als Verfassungsziel ins Grundgesetz auf- genommen und in der Schweiz sogar der Verfassungsgrundsatz der Tierwürde festgeschrieben.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Rights Movement
    Animal Rights Movement The Animal Protection Movement. Prevention of cruelty to animals became an important movement in early 19th Century England, where it grew alongside the humanitarian current that advanced human rights, including the anti-slavery movement and later the movement for woman suffrage. The first anti-cruelty bill, intended to stop bull-baiting, was introduced in Parliament in 1800. In 1822 Colonel Richard Martin succeeded in passing an act in the House of Commons preventing cruelty to such larger domestic animals as horses and cattle; two years later he organized the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) to help enforce the law. Queen Victoria commanded the addition of the prefix "Royal" to the Society in 1840. Following the British model, Henry Bergh organized the American SPCA in New York in 1866 after returning from his post in St. Petersburg as secretary to the American legation in Russia; he hoped it would become national in scope, but the ASPCA remained primarily an animal shelter program for New York City. Other SPCAs and Humane Societies were founded in the U.S. beginning in the late 1860s (often with support from abolitionists) with groups in Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and San Francisco among the first. Originally concerned with enforcing anti-cruelty laws, they soon began running animal shelters along the lines of a model developed in Philadelphia. The American Humane Association (AHA), with divisions for children and animals, was founded in 1877, and emerged as the leading national advocate for animal protection and child protection services. As the scientific approach to medicine expanded, opposition grew to the use of animals in medical laboratory research -- particularly in the era before anesthetics and pain-killers became widely available.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Animal Law 2005.01.Pdf
    VOL. I 2005 JOURNAL OF ANIMAL LAW Michigan State University College of Law J O U R N A L O F A N I M A L L A W VOL. I 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION The Gathering Momentum…………………………………………………………………. 1 David Favre ARTICLES & ESSAYS Non-Economic Damages: Where does it get us and how do we get there? ……………….. 7 Sonia Waisman A new movement in tort law seeks to provide money damages to persons losing a companion animal. These non-compensatory damages are highly controversial, and spark a debate as to whether such awards are the best thing for the animals—or for the lawyers. Would a change in the property status of companion animals better solve this important and emotional legal question? Invented Cages: The Plight of Wild Animals in Captivity ………………………………... 23 Anuj Shah & Alyce Miller The rate of private possession of wild animals in the United States has escalated in recent years. Laws at the federal, state, and local levels remain woefully inadequate to the task of addressing the treatment and welfare of the animals themselves and many animals “slip through the cracks,” resulting in abuse, neglect, and often death. This article explores numerous facets of problems inherent in the private possession of exotic animals. The Recent Development of Portugese Law in the Field of Animal Rights ………………. 61 Professor Fernando Arajúo Portugal has had a long and bloody tradition of violence against animals, not the least of which includes Spanish-style bullfighting that has shown itself to be quite resistant to legal, cultural, and social reforms that would respect the right of animals to be free from suffering.
    [Show full text]
  • Jm Coetzee and Animal Rights
    J.M. COETZEE AND ANIMAL RIGHTS: ELIZABETH COSTELLO’S CHALLENGE TO PHILOSOPHY Richard Alan Northover SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA PRETORIA, 0002, SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: Professor David Medalie OCTOBER 2009 © University of Pretoria Abstract The thesis relates Coetzee’s focus on animals to his more familiar themes of the possibility of fiction as a vehicle for serious ethical issues, the interrogation of power and authority, a concern for the voiceless and the marginalised, a keen sense of justice and the question of secular salvation. The concepts developed in substantial analyses of The Lives of Animals and Disgrace are thereafter applied to several other works of Coetzee. The thesis attempts to position J.M. Coetzee within the animal rights debate and to assess his use of his problematic persona, Elizabeth Costello, who controversially uses reason to attack the rationalism of the Western philosophical tradition and who espouses the sympathetic imagination as a means of developing respect for animals. Costello’s challenge to the philosophers is problematised by being traced back to Plato’s original formulation of the opposition between philosophers and poets. It is argued that Costello represents a fallible Socratic figure who critiques not reason per se but an unqualified rationalism. This characterisation of Costello explains her preoccupation with raising the ethical awareness of her audience, as midwife to the birth of ideas, and perceptions of her as a wise fool, a characterisation that is confirmed by the use of Bakhtin’s notion of the Socratic dialogue as one of the precursors of the modern novel.
    [Show full text]
  • Science, Sentience, and Animal Welfare
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 1-2013 Science, Sentience, and Animal Welfare Robert C. Jones California State University, Chico, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ethawel Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, and the Nature and Society Relations Commons Recommended Citation Jones, R. C. (2013). Science, sentience, and animal welfare. Biology and Philosophy, 1-30. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Science, Sentience, and Animal Welfare Robert C. Jones California State University, Chico KEYWORDS animal, welfare, ethics, pain, sentience, cognition, agriculture, speciesism, biomedical research ABSTRACT I sketch briefly some of the more influential theories concerned with the moral status of nonhuman animals, highlighting their biological/physiological aspects. I then survey the most prominent empirical research on the physiological and cognitive capacities of nonhuman animals, focusing primarily on sentience, but looking also at a few other morally relevant capacities such as self-awareness, memory, and mindreading. Lastly, I discuss two examples of current animal welfare policy, namely, animals used in industrialized food production and in scientific research. I argue that even the most progressive current welfare policies lag behind, are ignorant of, or arbitrarily disregard the science on sentience and cognition. Introduction The contemporary connection between research on animal1 cognition and the moral status of animals goes back almost 40 years to the publication of two influential books: Donald Griffin’s The Question of Animal Awareness: Evolutionary Continuity of Mental Experience (1976) and Peter Singer’s groundbreaking Animal Liberation (1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Shivley Colostate 0053A 13792.Pdf (3.519Mb)
    DISSERTATION EXPLORING ANIMAL WELFARE THROUGH AN INVESTIGATION OF VETERINARY EDUCATION AND ON-FARM ASSESSMENTS OF DAIRY CALF WELFARE Submitted by Chelsey B. Shivley Department of Animal Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2016 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Temple Grandin Franklyn B. Garry Terry E. Engle Bernard E. Rollin Martha L. Kesel Copyright by Chelsey B. Shivley 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT EXPLORING ANIMAL WELFARE THROUGH AN INVESTIGATION OF VETERINARY EDUCATION AND ON-FARM ASSESSMENTS OF DAIRY CALF WELFARE Animal welfare encompasses many different areas, including science, ethics, economics and law. Veterinarians have an opportunity to serve as leaders in the field of animal welfare due to their interaction with all aspects of animal use. In order to do so, they must be properly trained, and veterinary curricula were evaluated for courses related to animal welfare, ethics, and behavior. Consumers are concerned with how animals are managed, and aspects of welfare of preweaned dairy calves, including colostrum quality, passive transfer status, average daily gain, and bull calf management, were evaluated. The objective of the first study presented in Chapter III was to explore the extent to which veterinary colleges and schools accredited by the AVMA Council on Education (COE) have incorporated specific courses related to animal welfare, behavior, and ethics. The design included a survey and curriculum review. The sample included all 49 AVMA COE–accredited veterinary colleges and schools (institutions). The study consisted of 2 parts. In part 1, a survey regarding animal welfare, behavior, and ethics was e-mailed to the associate dean of academic affairs at all 49 AVMA COE–accredited institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • 20180217160414 13408.Pdf
    本书由北京第二外国语学院博士学术文库资助。 Toward Ecological Humanism:Decoding the Animal Images in Kurt Vonnegut’s Fiction 走走向生态人文主义向生态人文主义 ———解码冯内古特小说中的动物意象—解码冯内古特小说中的动物意象 李素杰 著 中中国人民大学出版社国人民大学出版社 ·北北京京· 图书在版编目（CIP）数据 走向生态人文主义：解码冯内古特小说中的动物意象：英文/李素杰著. —北京：中国 人民大学出版社，2013.9 ISBN 978-7-300-18064-9 Ⅰ.① 走…Ⅱ. ①李…Ⅲ. ①冯内古特，K.―小说研究―英文Ⅳ. ①I712.074 中国版本图书馆 CIP 数据核字（2013）第 213113 号 新思路大学英语 走向生态人文主义——解码冯内古特小说中的动物意象 Toward Ecological Humanism: Decoding the Animal Images in Kurt Vonnegut’s Fiction 李素杰 著 Zouxiang Shengtai Renwen Zhuyi——Jiema Fengneigute Xiaoshuo Zhong de Dongwu Yixiang 出版发行 中国人民大学出版社 社 址 北京中关村大街 31 号 邮政编码 100080 电 话 010-62511242（总编室） 010-62511398（质管部） 010-82501766（邮购部） 010-62514148（门市部） 010-62515195（发行公司） 010-62515275（盗版举报） 网 址 http://www.crup.com.cn http://www.ttrnet.com（人大教研网） 经 销 新华书店 印 刷 北京市易丰印刷有限责任公司 规 格 148 mm×210 mm 32 开本 版 次 2013 年 9 月第 1 版 印 张 9.5 印 次 2013 年 9 月第 1 次印刷 字 数 264 000 定 价 30.00 元 版权所有 侵权必究 印装差错 负责调换 序（一） 库尔特 · 冯内古特是当代美国最重要、最具代表性的后现代主义 小说家之一，也是曾经就读于康奈尔大学的文坛怪杰之一。他的作品 经常借科幻小说的叙述模式讲述人类的未来或者遥远的外星球的故 事，读来荒诞离奇、滑稽搞怪，致使很多人误以为他只是一个卖点高 但无深意的流行小说家。实际上，冯内古特骨子里是一个传统的人， 固执地坚守着家庭、爱情、正义、公平等价值观念，真诚地倡导人类 社会的真、善、美。只是后工业时代的美国社会现实令他感到失望， 使他对人性也充满讥讽与挖苦。而且，他敏锐地发现传统的艺术手段 已经无法打动日益冷漠的读者，必须采取“非正常”的叙述手段才能 形成足够的刺激，唤醒读者对现实的清醒认识。 李素杰的专著《走向生态人文主义——解码冯内古特小说中的动 物意象》正是对冯内古特的这一独特的艺术特色和他的人道主义思想 所做的深入研究。她指出，在冯内古特嬉笑怒骂的小丑面具背后，其 实掩盖着一颗真诚、正直、深怀责任感的心，在他荒诞不经的故事里 蕴藏着对美国当代社会的关切和对人类未来的忧虑。更为重要的是， 李素杰选取了一个迄今为止无论在国内还是国外的冯内古特研究中都 尚无人问津的全新视角——动物意象。运用动物研究这一新兴理论， 通过大量认真仔细的文本研读和细致深入的分析，她向我们展示了一 个鲜为人知的冯内古特小说中的动物世界。这些动物形象，并非传统 意义上的为了增添语言表现力和丰富性所采用的修辞手段，而是小说 家始终如一的强烈的人道主义关怀的有机组成部分，是具有鲜活生命
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Sense: the Case for Abolishing Sow Stalls
    January 2013 Science and Sense THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING SOW STALLS This report was written by Dr Malcolm Caulfield and PATRONS reviewed by Voiceless’s Scientific Expert Advisory Council. • Professor J.M. Coetzee It is endorsed by the World Society for the Protection Nobel Prize for Literature Winner 2003, author of of Animals, Compassion in World Farming and Animals The Lives of Animals and Elizabeth Costello Australia. • Brian Sherman AM Businessman and philanthropist Images courtesy of Animals Australia. • Dr Jane Goodall World-renowned primatologist and animal advocate © January 2013 • The Hon Michael Kirby AC CMG ISBN: 978-0-9803740-6-3 (paperback) Former Justice of the High Court of Australia ISBN: 978-0-9803740-7-0 (online) SCIENTIFIC EXPERT ADVISORY COUNCIL Voiceless • Professor Marc Bekoff 2 Paddington Street Professor Emeritus of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Paddington NSW 2021 Australia University of Colorado, Boulder. Co-founder with Jane T. +612 9357 0723 F. +612 9357 0711 Goodall of Ethologists for the Ethical Treatment of [email protected] Animals. • Dr Malcolm Caulfield Founder and Principal Lawyer of the Animal Welfare Community Legal Centre. Formerly a pharmacologist in ABOUT VOICELESS industry and academia. Voiceless is an independent and non-profit think tank • Professor Clive Phillips dedicated to alleviating the suffering of animals in Foundation Chair of Animal Welfare, Centre for Animal Australia. Established in 2004 by father and daughter team, Welfare and Ethics, University of Queensland. Brian Sherman AM and Ondine Sherman, Voiceless: • Professor Lesley J. Rogers • Creates and fosters networks of leading lawyers, Emeritus Professor of Neuroscience and Animal politicians, businesspeople and professionals to Behaviour, University of New England.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to the UK Government on Support for the Dairy Industry
    Open Letter to the UK Government on Support for the Dairy Industry To: Mr George Eustice, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Cc: Mr Rishi Sunak, The Chancellor and Treasury Dear Mr Eustice, We the undersigned understand that representatives of the UK dairy industry, namely the National Farmers Union (NFU) and The Royal Association of British Dairy Farmers (RABDF) are pressuring the government to step in with financial support for their industry, due to collapsing demand from the foodservice and hospitality sectors. This is amid a growing ‘crisis’ causing some farmers to start dumping cows’ milk. Whilst we sympathise with all small UK businesses during this challenging time and appreciate the vital role that food producers may play, with regards to national food security, it is important to maintain perspective. The UK dairy industry is clearly in decline and has been experiencing a recent but significant drop in consumer demand. There are now fewer than 9,500 dairy farms in the UK compared with 13,000 10 years ago, and it has been predicted there will be fewer than 5,000 by 2025. On the other hand, the UK market for dairy alternatives has grown by 150% in 6 years. Plant-based business is positively booming. Whilst we appreciate the need to support farmers, we shouldn’t collectively keep artificially propping up a failing industry with public funds. We would instead like to see support for a progressive transition over to more sustainable, healthier and planet-friendly, non-animal-based agriculture or into other sustainable forms of land management.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Ethics in Animal Research: Philosophy, Regulation, and Laboratory Applications John P
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Purdue University Press e-books Purdue University Press 1-4-2002 Applied Ethics in Animal Research: Philosophy, Regulation, and Laboratory Applications John P. Gluck Tony DiPasquale F. Barbara Orlans Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks Recommended Citation Gluck, John P.; DiPasquale, Tony; and Orlans, F. Barbara, "Applied Ethics in Animal Research: Philosophy, Regulation, and Laboratory Applications" (2002). Purdue University Press e-books. Book 15. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/purduepress_ebooks/15 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Gluck, DiPasquale, Orlans Gluck, DiPasquale, Applied Ethics / Veterinary Studies Few contemporary issues arouse as much passionate rhetoric as the ethics of labo- ratory animal use. These essays challenge people of good faith to face the issues Applied Ethics in relevant to the ethics of using animals in biomedical and behavioral research. They discuss issues of philosophy, statutory regulation, and laboratory application of ethics in ways depleted of sheer rhetoric and attempts to manipulate. The result is an open dialogue that allows readers to reach a deepened understanding of the Animal Research issue and to form their own opinions. “This is an excellent compilation of analyses from some of the leading thinkers in Applied Ethics in Animal Research the world on animal research ethics. I would recommend it as a useful addition to anyone’s library.”—ANDREW N. ROWAN, PH.D., Senior Vice President, Philosophy, Regulation, Humane Society of the United States “This book advances our understanding of an inherently compelling, complex, and and Laboratory Applications conflicted field.
    [Show full text]
  • Roots of Human Resistance to Animal Rights: Psychological and Conceptual Blocks
    \\Server03\productn\L\LCA\8-1\LCA105.txt unknown Seq: 1 14-MAY-02 15:16 ROOTS OF HUMAN RESISTANCE TO ANIMAL RIGHTS: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND CONCEPTUAL BLOCKS By Steven J. Bartlett* Animal law has focused attention on such interconnected issues as the prop- erty status of nonhuman animals, juristic personhood, and standing. These subjects are undeniably central concerns that dominate discussions of animal rights, but they do not relate to the most fundamental factors that are responsible both for human resistance to animal rights and for our spe- cies' well-entrenched, cruel, and self-righteous exploitation and destruction of nonhuman animals. In this comment, the author reviews recent advocacy of animal rights and offers the first study of human psychological and con- ceptual blocks that stand in the way of efforts on behalf of animal law and legislation. Paying long overdue attention to these obstacles provides a real- istic framework for evaluating the effectiveness of attempts to initiate mean- ingful change. I am in favour of animal rights as well as human rights. That is the way of a whole human being. ÐAbraham Lincoln I. INTRODUCTION: ANIMALS AS PROPERTYÐIS THIS THE PROBLEM? Animals are property. These three wordsÐand their legal implications and practical ramificationsÐdefine the most significant doctrines and cases . and the realities for current practitioners of animal law.1 For many people in our society, the concept of legal rights for other animals is quite ªunthinkable.º That is because our relationship with the * Senior Research Professor of Philosophy, Oregon State University; Visiting Scholar in Psychology & Philosophy, Willamette University; Previously Professor of Philosophy, St.
    [Show full text]